Chomsky's Disgusting Epstein Ties Prove He Was COMPROMISED ALL ALONG!

The Royal British Legion gave me a life worth fighting for, reawakening that sense of worth. Write your will for free today to protect your loved ones and give veterans like Naomi a fresh start. I do now see that I do have life and my life is worth living. People like you gave me hope again. Start writing your will for free today with the Royal British Legion. Search RBL Free Wills to find out more. Come see me on tour. I'll be in Lansing, Milwaukee, Albuquerque, Houston, Dallas, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas. Go to jimidore.com for a link for tickets. If you go anywhere, you're going to pay more. So it turns out Chomsky was exactly as I suspected. He was most likely a compromised by the intelligence community. Not only because he came straight out of MIT, but because of the things he did and said. I'm going to show you how he said it didn't matter who killed JFK, so stop looking into it. He said that what Dick Cheney said about 9-11, how it happened is exactly how it happened and your conspiracy theory, if you think otherwise. He said that people who want health care are kids who want candy. And he said that you should take the COVID-19 vaccine and if you don't, you should be separated from society and how you get food is your own problem. These are all things that not a guy who pretends to be a lefty and speaking up for the working man would say. This is something that you would say if you were compromised by the oligarchy, the establishment and the deep state, which I'm pretty sure Chomsky was at this point. Because that's exactly the type of people that the deep state need. They need somebody who seems so far left, he's so out there that anybody far the left than him is just crazy. And in fact, he'll tell you they're crazy. So that's his function. And he did it in every four years. He told you you were crazy if you didn't vote for a Democrat. So he kept you in the two-party duopoly, which he could never get you out of. So here, combat, Chomsky taught a generation to dismiss the ruling class coordination as a conspiracy theory. While dining with the man who coordinated blackmail operations for that same ruling class. So that's another reason why you know that he's probably compromised by the deep state. Chomsky was because his whole thing was dismiss the conspiracy theory that the ruling class coordinated. But here he is. Okay. All right. You know what they say about Chomsky? Know him? I didn't know him until you got him on an island with Jeffrey Epstein. Come on. No, I'm hardly fucked. Yeah. Newly released files shed light on Chomsky and Epstein's relationship. The latest communications undermined Chomsky's earlier claims that he primarily had financial dealings with Epstein. Because they had already been approached with this and Chomsky dismissed him. I don't have to answer for anything. It was just finances. And perhaps most strikingly in late February 2019, Epstein represented to an associate that he had gotten advice from Chomsky over how to navigate the horrible way you are being treated in the press and the public. So Chomsky's giving advice. He's giving advice to Epstein on how to handle his public relations problem now that he's been convicted of his crimes with girls. Do a fluff interview with Steve Bannon because it happened around this time and they have bus friends. Hey God, that was 11 years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. And months before he would be reportedly died by suicide while in federal custody awaiting trafficking charges. So this is Chomsky. This is 11 years after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting underage girl for prostitution. This is what Chomsky said. So here it is, Noam Chomsky giving Epstein advice on how to outlast the PDF file allegations against him. So here it is. So you can read it. This is Chomsky speaking to Epstein. I've watched the horrible way you are being treated in the press and public. It's simple to say, but I think the best way to proceed is to ignore it. I've had plenty of experience, though of course not on this scale. A Google search will bring up tons of hysterical accusations of all sorts, even groups devoted to vilifying me. I pay no attention unless I'm approached for a comment on a specific matter. It's a nuisance, but it's the best way, the same conclusions from experiences of others in some cases close friends. What the vultures? Vultures. He's calling them vultures. Okay, just so you know. And by the way, Chomsky's an intellectual force of nature to throw good advice out with the bathwater, actually containing a baby. Anyway, so Chomsky is telling Epstein that everyone and anyone picking on him is a vulture. But let's remember vultures only gather when you're already rotting. So they don't attack anything that's alive. Anyway, so here we go. You're a vital part of the ecosystem, as a matter of fact. That's right. What the vultures dearly want is a public response, which then provides a public opening for an onslaught of venomous attacks. Many from just publicity seekers or cranks of all sorts, which are impossible to answer. How do you prove that you are not a neo-nazi who wants to kill the Jews or a great best or whatever charge comes along? That's particularly true now with the hysteria that has developed about abuse of women, which has reached the point that even questioning a charge is a crime worse than murder. That's true. For virtually everyone who sees any of this, the reaction will be where there's smoke, there's fire, maybe a raging fire, whatever the facts, which few will even think of investigating. In general, it's best, I think, not to react unless directly questioned, particularly in the current mood, which I presume will fade away, even if not in time to prevent much torture and distress. Hard to say, but it's the best advice I can think of. So that is Noam Chomsky. So you can come to me now. He said the same thing to me, Jimmy, when I was on the Epstein list, as I told you, and it was comforting me a lot. He said, just Netflix and chill, get a pizza. So there he is advising Epstein on how to, after he's already, 11 years after he's already pled guilty to procuring an underage girl for prostitution. This is the second one? And now this is him after. Okay. So just to let you know, the best, so this third is the best way to proceed is to ignore it. Chomsky wrote, according to the text signed under his name, that Epstein sent to a lawyer and publicist. That's particularly true now. So that's it. Neither Chomsky nor his second wife and spokesperson Valeria Chomsky immediately responded to inquiries about the Epstein related emails in question, including whether they disputed the authenticity. So he's not saying anything about him because they are authentic. Wait, the hysterical thing about women. Remember Chomsky was hysterical about Steve Bannon, but here they all are chummy. Yes. He was hysterical about that he's a Nazi. Remember that? I do remember that Chomsky's affiliation with Epstein netted him invitations to vacation together and recognizable names to his orbit. For instance, after the email showed him and the Chomsky's making plans to meet up in 2016, Epstein wrote to Noam Chomsky, enjoy it as always. Come to New York or the Caribbean. Enjoy the food. We did too very much Chomsky replied to Epstein. Valeria is always keen on New York. I'm really fantasizing about the Caribbean island. That's Chomsky. That's Chomsky. Oh, in my mind I'm already on vacation, Jimmy. And it's not because of anything nefarious. It's just that Chomsky always secretly longed to be a pirate. He's got a case of the Mondays. Yeah. At another point the same year Epstein, a Brooklyn native, discussed being free anytime to meet up with Chomsky in New York City because everyone in the city besides us will be gone separate from Woody. Maybe we can do it again. Meaning Woody Allen. What? Chomsky. Imagine three of them together. What kind of Woody Allen movie that would make. Wow. I don't know. She said I did it. But it's crazy. Well, what did you say? Maybe just stick it out. I don't know. Chomsky replied that it would be great to grab dinner with Epstein and the Allens, meaning Woody Allen and his wife, I guess. And so manufacturing consent has a whole new meaning now. Yeah. Yes, it does. Yes, it does. And so I just want to show you, this is Chomsky talking about 9-11 and the JFK murder. And listen to what he says about 9-11 and listen to what he says about JFK's assassination. It's a real shit. Oh, isn't he? Yeah. I would say that I'm pretty isolated on this in the West. I mean, a large part of the left completely disagrees on this and has all kind of elaborate conspiracy theories and about how it happened and why it happened and so on. But I think it's just, I think it's simply wrong. But also I think it's diverting people from serious issues. I mean, it just doesn't make it. And even if we're true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean, for the main significance. But it's a little bit like the... So there he is saying, it's ridiculous. Even if it's true... Even if it were true, who cares? Even if it's true, who cares? Does he work for Massad? That's awfully Massad of him to say. What? Who cares about JFK and 9-11? 9-11? Ben Shapiro said that. Wait, here, that's what Ben Shapiro... Exactly, Kurt. He sounds exactly like Ben Shapiro. Oh, JFK. Well, here's who he goes into JFK. He goes, it's just like... Huge energy that's put out. I'm trying to figure out who killed John F. Kennedy. He goes, it's just like the huge energy put out on trying to figure out who killed JFK. So what he's saying is that's a misappropriation of your energy to try to figure out who assassinated and did a coup of the United States government. That it's a misplaced energy to try to figure out who actually couped the United States government, which is what that was. That was a coup. And this is him saying that's a misappropriation of your energy. Listen to what he says next. Yeah, who knows? And who cares? I mean, plenty of people get killed all the time. It doesn't matter that one of them had to be John F. Kennedy. Who knows? And who cares who killed? People get killed all the time. What does it matter that one of them was John F. Kennedy? Because it was a coup of our government. If it doesn't matter, why should I vote then? I mean, like, that's not the biggest deal in the world that somebody killed the leader of a nation and took it over. I mean, I know it's not a big deal when we do it, but it happened to us. That's crazy. Who cares? Who cares that maybe a foreign country or our own CIA or Lyndon Baines Johnson, who became president, was in on murdering the president and overthrowing the government, the will of the people, the duly elected government of the United States. Someone overturned an election and did it. Who cares? Who cares? So that's why I'm... If that doesn't make you think... And he's not a dumb guy. He's an intellectual. That's crazy as a smart guy like that. Hey, who cares? Let the boys kill each other, right? No. So he knows what he's saying is crazy. He's doing that for a purpose. And if you can give me a better reason than he's compromised by the intelligence community, I'll listen to it. But I haven't heard of a better explanation of why he would say this crazy, stupid stuff. Even if it's true, 9-11, who cares? Who cares? I guess some of the dead people, they're dead now. And we all know now for a fact that 9-11 did not happen any way they tried to pretend it did. Okay, here, let's see. Is there any more? If there was some reason to believe that there was a high level of conspiracy, it might be interesting. He said, if there's reason to believe that it was a high level conspiracy, it might be interesting. Okay. But the evidence against that is overwhelming. But the evidence against that is overwhelming. What evidence against that are you talking about? You're talking about the Warren Commission? Are you talking about another miracle bullet? What evidence? Hey, Michael Tracy, what's this mountain of evidence? It sounds like Michael Tracy. The evidence that Epstein didn't was in a trafficker's overwhelming. Do you see how dipshit posted like the report from the Cash Patel fucking lie? Yeah. It's unreal. This to me is on, and this right, it would be enough for me to think, oh, of course the guy who comes from MIT, who dismisses 9-11 conspiracy theories even if they're true. Yeah, he's part of that cult. And JFK conspiracy theories even if they're true, dismisses them. Who cares? Well, he knows why it's important. He knows what it means. He knows why it matters. He knows that cooing a government matters. He knows especially if it's a foreign country. He knows especially if it's a vice president who took over for him, who's working for that foreign country. He knows also if it's our own intelligence community. That means that the intelligence community is running the country and not the duly elected politicians. That's why it matters. That's why it's all important. And he knows this. And so there's nothing that makes me crazier than one as guy who I know is 10 times smarter than me, acts like he's dumber than me. Yeah, well, that's how Israel does their propaganda, isn't it? And after that, it's just a matter of having to be a jealous husband or a mafia or someone else. What difference does it make? It's just taking energy away from serious issues and the ones that don't matter. And I think the same is for your personal. So there you go. What does it matter? Who cares? Who doesn't matter? Who cares? Who killed the president? We got to worry about serious issues, Jimmy. Yes, we got to worry about serious. Okay. Building concentration camps for the unvaccinated. So he's participating in the conspiracy. If the only reason why he would do that is because he's compromised by the deep state, him doing that is his participation in the conspiracy to kill JFK. Right? By extension, am I being... I think he participated in the stuff Epstein was doing from the looks of the emails to me. So he's telling you that one of the worst conspiracies in the history of humankind doesn't matter. And in fact, it's just a crazy conspiracy. Let me hear what he says. What are your thoughts on mandating vaccines? Well, it's a mixed story. I think we... People who refuse to accept vaccines, I think the right response for them is not to force them to, but rather to insist that they be isolated. If people decide I am willing to be a danger to the community by refusing a vaccine, they should then say, well, I also have the decency to isolate myself. Okay. I don't want a vaccine, but I don't have the right to run on a human duty. No, just that should be a convention enforcing this is a different question. So he's saying that the people who didn't want to take the experimental medical treatment that is not a vaccine and had horrible side effects and didn't stop transmission or contraction. So there's no reason to have someone else take... And by the way, you're going to take the vaccine. Why do you need someone else to take the vaccine? You'll never be able to explain that to me. And he can't explain it, but he said they want to harm me. Well, if the vaccine really works the way you say it works, then why do you need someone else to take it? I don't need someone else to take a Tylenol when I get a headache. I take the Tylenol. I don't need someone else to drink booze for me to get drunk. I drink it. So again, this is him doing the bidding of the deep state because the deep state was behind COVID. 100%. 100%. Above the deep state. Look at it. Did he wear a mask and check the girls at the island to make sure they're vaccinated? Right. Just fucking old Liz. So here he is. He doubles down on this. Here he is. So Primo Nutmeg, he asks him about this again. Like, do you really... So listen. We talk about folks having the freedom to separate if they don't want to abide by these vaccine mandates. What would that look like on a practical level? Does that mean that folks need to just stay home and have like groceries delivered to them? Like separated communities of folks who are unvaccinated? Or just, you know, how do you think this would practically play out? Same way as with people who say that I don't want to accept traffic rules. I suppose there were people who said, it's an attack on my liberty to make me stop at a red light. It's government overreach. I don't want the state to have that power over my private life. Well, such people have to be... They should have the decency to remove themselves from the community. If they refuse to do that, then measures have to be taken to safeguard the community from them. That becomes the practical question that you ask. So he's saying if they don't remove... If you don't take this experimental medical treatment that doesn't do anything that they say it does, meaning stopping transmission and contraction. And in fact, the more according to the Cleveland Clinic, the more of these shots you take, the more likely you are to get COVID and more likely you are to get sick. Oh, no shit. So the exact opposite. And he's saying that we have to then... We have to take measures to protect ourselves from them, meaning isolate them. He's saying it. Maybe get away to a private island or something, no? Maybe a private island. How can we get food to them? Well, that's actually there. So then he says, how would we get food to them? Listen to what he says. Hang on. There. I'm not even thinking about it. So we get food to them. Then comes the practical question that you ask. How can we get food to them? Well, that's actually their problem. That's their problem. How do we get food to the people who we just kicked out of society because they wouldn't go along with Big Pharma and the CIA COVID narrative? Very Gaza of him, isn't it? In fact, I'm here in the Israeli intel oozing out of him now that I didn't spot at the time. At the time, remember you go, I guess he's old and he's afraid of dying or something because it seemed weird. No, this is straight up propaganda. This is straight up... He's in on it. He's in on it. This piece of shit. He's always been in on it. Yeah. He's always been in on it. And this is my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my father who's my is screwing the workers and screwing anybody who doesn't go along with big pharma and the deep state's agenda. Screw them, separate them from society. How do they get food? That's their problem. Hey, maybe you and your pals can eat food in front of them as they starve, right? Rabbi Chomsky. And he gives you that stupid argument that not taking an experimental medical treatment is somehow akin to not following traffic lights. They got nothing to do with, hey, you know the difference between a traffic light and an experimental medical treatment? When I go through a traffic light, I don't have to wait 15 minutes to see if I die. Yeah. Well, that's the big deal. So that's that horrible, horrible analogy that comedians, I heard comedians make this stupid argument that he's making. It makes no sense. Why is it? Well, they follow authority. Of course. He looks at you as cattle. That's why he's talking this way. So all that glum thing where they lick his cattle, that's why, well, let him get food. He sounds like Randy Fine, don't he? Yep. And so here he is being asked about when during COVID, when the Democrats took over the house, they had a majority of like eight votes, which was the squad. It was AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Pramila Jayapal, all those people that are in the squad, right? So if they all voted together, they could force Nancy Pelosi to give them something for their vote for her as Speaker. It's the same thing the Republicans did to McCarthy. The Freedom Caucus, they wanted certain things before they voted for him, and he couldn't become the Speaker without their votes because it was such a narrow majority in the House, they needed every vote of every Republican. So they had power over the Speaker to extract things for their vote. That's what we wanted. The Democrats, the squad, AOC and all those people, we wanted them to extract something from Nancy Pelosi for her vote. Well, everybody in the Democratic Party had always said we want to vote for, especially AOC, even Nancy Pelosi said they wanted to have a vote for Medicare for All on the House floor. Let's have a vote. And what's the good thing about that? Well, we have a discussion about Medicare for All on a national stage that everybody's watching during a pandemic. So that would be a great time to have this discussion and then have a vote on it and see where people fall because 100 Democrats in the Congress say they're for Medicare for All. Well, let's see how they vote. Let's see. So now, and AOC and everybody said it's good to have a vote to see where people stand. So now we're like, well, you campaigned on that, which they did. So we're asking you to actually do that. It was called force to vote. We wanted AOC and the squad to say, hey, we're not going to vote for Nancy Pelosi to become speaker and she can't become speaker without our votes unless they have a vote for Medicare for All on the floor. Not that we thought it would win, but we thought it would be a great move forward for the movement for Medicare for All to get a discussion on this and have a vote on it on the House floor because everybody in the Democratic Party, in the DSA, in the Progressive Caucus have said that we, AOC famously said it when she was running for office that we can't even get a vote for Medicare for All on the House floor. We can't even get a vote. So this is what he's talking about. So we started at this show a thing called force to vote. It became a big movement and they didn't do it. And then two years later, when the Republicans took over, they did it. They actually did a force to vote. And it's because we were told we couldn't do it. So here he is being asked about that force to vote and what he thought of it. Well, let's take a look at the real world, not a dream world, the world we live in. So that's what every establishment hack would say. We live in the real world. We don't live in a dream where you can't just have everything you want, that the Medicare for All vote would fail. We know it's going to fail, but the point is to get everybody on the record in the middle of a pandemic and have people start talking from coast to coast about Medicare for All and our healthcare system. That was the point of that. And that would be a victory, even if the bill got voted down, which we knew it would because everybody in Congress is corrupt and bought by the health insurance company and big pharma. So we knew it would fail. That's not why we asked for it. We asked for it because it would be a big step forward and start a conversation and would get everybody on the record. And now we know where you stand. You can you can sign a petition saying you're for it, but now vote for it. So here he is trying to say that that is not in the real world. So he asked, so what he's doing is using the framing of the establishment. He's used, he's framing this not as an activist, not as a person who stands up for workers or poor people or regular voters. He's framing this as an oligarch frames this, who framed it this way. Hillary Clinton framed it this way. And that's what he's doing. So let's listen. Let's take a look at the real world, not a dream world, the world we live in. Suppose you push, suppose you manage to push Pelosi to say, let's have a vote on Medicare for all in the Senate, push Schumer to have it. We know exactly what's going to happen. Fifty Republicans will vote against it. A large number of Democrats will vote against it. Two certainly, not just in a moment, probably plenty of others. So what we're saying is, so he's mixing it. We weren't asking for a vote in the Senate. We're asking for a vote in the house. And so he's completely trying to muddy the issue so you don't know what he's talked to, you don't know what the issue is really about. That's a trick of a propagandist. And this is Noam Chomsky doing propaganda. That's a trick of a propagandist. He's completely misframing it. He's saying, well, all you need is to get two Democrats to vote against it in the house. That's all. No, no, it's that we're not talking about the Senate. We're talking about the house. So we can weed out the people that vote against it. That's right. You know what you want to do with the unvaccinated? Well, take that thought. And now the piece is a shit there who worked for a fucking Israel like you. Here we go. And is, let's do something to be defeated. Is that a strategy? So he wouldn't come on my show. He would go on everybody else's show during force to vote. He wouldn't come on my show because he knew that I would see right through his BS and I would expose him for going against the things he claims to be. He's not those things. He turns out he was compromised all along by the deep state. So here's what I want to get Mumford in, son. So let's, yeah, so let's listen to this house. I played all the way through. Let's take a look at the real world, not a dream world, the world we live in. Suppose you push, suppose you managed to push Pelosi to say, let's have a vote on Medicare for all and the Senate push Schumer to have it. We know exactly what's going to happen. 50 Republicans will vote against it. A large number of Democrats will vote against it. Two certainly. Notions, cinnamon, probably plenty of others. So what we're saying is let's do something to be defeated. Is that a strategy? That's not our strategy. I mean, you know, it's nice to have to say, I want this, but we're, it's nice to say I want this. What he's talking about is healthcare, healthcare that he's had his entire life. And in fact, he's had at least Medicare for 40 years at this point, 30 years at this point, because you get it at 65 and he's around 95 or so. So he's had it for 30 years. He's had unlimited healthcare, but he doesn't, but if you want it, well, guess, guess what? It's unreasonable. Let's listen to what he says. If you want it. Not children who say, I want this piece of candy. Then you're, you're like children who say you want this piece of candy. That's the verbatim what, what Hillary Clinton would say about Medicare for all. That's verbatim what she would say that you're like a child who wants candy. He's referring to healthcare in the middle of a pandemic as candy. That's the exact talking points that came directly from the deep state, which, which Hillary Clinton said all the time, that is not an activist. That is not a guy who stands up for the working people. That is not a guy who stands up for you. That is a guy who's there to trick you. That is a guy who's 100% compromised. That's who Joe Chomsky is to this day, because he's still alive. And that's why he wouldn't come on my show. He would go on shows that had five subscribers. I had millions of subscribers. He wouldn't come on my show. Yeah. Is that weird? The guy who set up forced to vote. The guy who was having hit pieces written about him in all the establishment magazines and rags. Everybody was coming. I was trending on Twitter almost every day for months because of it. He wouldn't come on my show because he knew I would expose him. It wouldn't take much. I'm going to ask for it even if I'm going up in my room. So that's Noam Chomsky equating healthcare activists with children who want candy. Well, what does he call pizza? I wonder. I wonder what he calls pizza. So he was also just, I don't want to spend too much time on this, but he was against, you know, that BDS, which sounds like it's got to do with spanking sex, but it's not. It's boycott divestment and sanctions. So that's that BDS is when people say, Hey, let's get together and boycott Israel. Let's not buy any of the goods that are produced in Israel. And this will be a way for us to pressure their government. The same thing we did with South Africa 30 years, 40 years ago, we did that. They did a don't, they had a big song by all the musicians. And the song was, I'm not going to play Sun City, meaning I'm not going to go there. We're going to boycott South Africa. Guess what? It worked. Yeah, it worked so well that Israel had to secretly give them nuclear weapons and pretend to not like apartheid. So it, so he's, so I just want to let you know he's against it. So he was, that's not suspicious. No, so he's against a nonviolent way to protest a genocidal government. So Jason Zaharis, I'll just read this because it's perfect. He says, Noam Chomsky was a poison on the American left. He taught many generations to dismiss ruling class coordination as a conspiracy theory, often smearing those who risk their careers like Michael Parenti. Now we already told you that he was the goat. He was the real deal. And Chomsky's a phony. Meanwhile, he was dining with Jeffrey Epstein and flying on his private jet. Chomsky was the perfect encapsulation of the deep state's proxy dissident because he was firmly anti-communist and anti-Soviet. So the CIA erased his previous activism against the Vietnam War and solidified his position at MIT, which is a CIA run institution. And therefore Mossad run. He then, which then therefore Mossad run, he then went on to support a number of Washington Washington's imperial objectives, meaning imperialism. He repeated the State Department's propaganda lines on Libya, on Syria, on Yugoslavia, on China, and on Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela in a way that would give the United States justification for sanctions or intervention. He supported two state solution, liberal Zionism, essentially formalizing Israel's 1948 Nakba against the Palestinians. He also strongly backed arms to the Ukrainian Nazi regime as they carried out genocide against the ethnic Russians and the Donbass. Who saw that coming? Who saw that coming? He supported forced vaccinations during COVID in placing the unvaccinated in concentration camps. He denounced forced to vote and called universal healthcare advocates, children wanting candy. He funneled left-wing energy back into the DC establishment by endorsing Democrats every four years. He would never endorse an independent. He would never tell you to get in the streets. He would never tell you to protest for anything. He would tell you to keep voting for the people oppressing you. It was these positions that led to further smears against Michael Parenti and other principled authors who not only denounced but also exposed and analyzed the class structure of US imperialism. So it's no wonder that as he was condescendingly talking down to the Palestinian-led BDS movement, he was meeting privately with one of history's worst Israeli war criminals, Ehud Barak. And worst of all, the meetings were brokered by Jeffrey Epstein himself, the PDF file oligarch and Mossad agent who mass abused and trafficked young girls and coordinated S blackmail operations for the same ruling class that Noam Chomsky defended by dismissing the ideas of coordination as conspiracy theories. Yeah, the organ-thieving class, we'll call them. So I come back from the start. So I know that there's a lot of people and people I like and respect that still want to praise Noam Chomsky, but I knew he was full of shit during forced to vote. That was it for me. JFK, 9-11, forced to vote every four years telling you to vote for the duopoly, the same corporatists. But then when forced to vote, I didn't know he had those positions on Syria and Libya. I didn't even know that. Well, remember he was on the wrong side of Kim boat. He was on the side of Pol Pot famously. So he's never gotten it right. Who is he work for? Unbelievable, man. That's just unreal. First of all, I never believed Israel killed JFK until now. I've just heard two scumbag Mossad agents say who cares who killed JFK. It sounds like Ben Shapiro. It indicates to me definitive proof Israel did it. Oh, you tell me how else to take that because that's the only way I can see. Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member. We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week. And it's a great way to help support the show. You can do it by going to jimidork.com. Clicking on join premium. It's the most affordable premium program in the business. And it's a great way to help put the thumb back in the eye of the bastards. Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member. And if you haven't, you're missing out. We give you lots of bonus content. Thanks for your support. So Lindsey Graham has been going on TV and he sounds like Kamala Harris. He sounds like he's mixing booze and Xanax. And he's slurring a lot. So here he is from Fox News Sunday. Let's look. I'd say they're going to push for it. Well, there's no sound. I'd say they're going to push for it. Well, what? Ready? I'd say they're going to push for it. Well, what we're going to do is well, I'm not going to agree that we're going to halt. If you had a judicial warrant and all these things, you couldn't you couldn't deal with mass. We're not we're not dealing with the we're trying to get people out of the country of no right to be here. Judge have people who are legal and rents. You remember Ken Davis? I mean, he's slurring a lot. Now, if this is a neurological problem, I don't want to make fun of it because that's that's not right. But what is going on? He is slurring his speech. And it does sound like he's drinking and taking Xanax. So let's start. Legal and rents. You remember Ken Davis? I have people who are legal and rents. You remember Ken Davis? I do. Okay. Who's Ken Davis, folks? Nothing to do with the legal immigration. It's not going to do the immigration. Exactly. And that's exactly how someone talks when they're drinking. That's exactly what someone sounds like when they're drinking. Ken Davis was a clerk of court in Kentucky. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of the land was that gay marriage was legal. That gay marriage was recognized under the U.S. Constitution. If you didn't recognize gay marriage, you violated the legal protection clause. She's a religious conservative. People applied to gay guys applied for marriage license. She said she wouldn't issue it even though it was the law of the land. She went to jail. I was asked, what about it? Well, I agree with her political philosophical, not her religious views, but she's a public official. She... He couldn't come up with the word philosophy. I didn't agree with her political philosophical... I didn't go along with her thing. That's wild. This is wild. Has to do this. You can't change the law because you disagree with it. She went to jail. She should have... I think it's a dividing moment in his presidency. Ronald Reagan went to the Berlin wall and he said, tear down this wall. He didn't say, could you make it lower? Biggest thing you could possibly ever do to the Mideas is take this regime down and there is weakest they've ever been since 1979. Mr. President, you can do it. I hope you will do it and if you do it, this is Reagan Bluss. Okay. This is Reagan what? West. Is that what he said? Reagan Bluss? It sounds like that. Well, then let's definitely not do it. So let's listen to the exact beginning again. And this is what you get for letting Kamala Harris coach you at lunch before your interview. Don't try to keep up with her. You don't have the tolerance, Lindsey. How many times are we going to push for it? Well, what we're going to do is, well, I'm not going to agree. They were grinding to halt. I'm not going to grind to grind to halt. I mean, he's literally slurring like a drunk. So let's... Here's another one. Lindsey Graham attempting to say he wants sanctuary city policies to end. Let's listen. I want sanctuary city policy. I want sanctuary... sanctuary... Here we go. I want sanctuary city policy. I want sanctuary... Listen, Barney, can you put me in the trunk tank and then I will get up in the morning. It's like a scene from Andy Griffith's show where Otis would come in drunk and put himself in jail, sleep there and wake up sober and they let him up. I mean, I find it hard to believe that Ms. Lindsey Graham don't have a tolerance. Come on. Lindsey Graham, that's a... that's a chemist-skeye if I've ever seen one in my life. I want sanctuary city policy to end. Hey, Mr. Jericho. Here's another one. He's on the... I'm not going to say Senator Graham is drunk because that would be unprofessional. Okay, here we go. But they got to see us fighting. We got to give them a chance to see the difference between us and Liberal Democrats and to what we're going to have. It sounds like Foster Brooks. Have you know who that is? He's a famous comedian. His whole gig was he would pretend he was drunk. He showed up and he would talk like, and that's what he's doing right here. But they got to see us fighting. We got to give them a chance to see the difference between us and Liberal Democrats. Yo, have the decency and gravitas to get some coke and even out before you big fucks do. No kidding. Come on, this is especially... But they got to see us fighting. We got to give them a chance to see the difference between us and Liberal Democrats. In two weeks we're going to have that chance and I can't wait until John Kennedy gets on the floor and sticks it to him about the insanity of sanctuary cities. I can't wait until he comes up here tonight. Let's just do that first one again. I think that was the best. This is the best one. What kind of thing are we going to push for it? Well, what we're going to do is, well, I'm not going to agree. They would grind it to a halt. If you had a judicial warrant and all these things, you couldn't deal with mass. We're not dealing with it. We're trying to get people out of the country of no right to be here, judge. Have people who are legal immigrants. Do you remember Kim Davis? I do. Okay, who's Kim Davis, folks? Nothing to do with the legal immigration. That's two times in a row. That's like two times within five seconds. I got the immigration. Was a clerk of court in Kentucky. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of the land was that gay marriage was legal. That gay marriage was legal. Okay, here's legal. They really ruled gay marriage legal. Okay, recognized under the US Constitution. If you didn't recognize gay marriage, you violated the legal protection clause. She's a religious conservative. She's a religious conservative. She's a religious conservative. We're gonna Steve Bannon laughing at him. Steve Bannon is laughing at him. I see you had your head. Chomsky thinks it's funny too. What's that Chomsky? It is funny. People apply to gay guys applied for. To guys. To gay. Let's listen. She's a religious conservative. People apply to gay guys applied for. He is smashed. He's hammered. If he did one of these, it would be all right. If he did two, okay. These are unbelievable. Marriage license. She said she wouldn't issue it, even though it was the law of the land. She went to jail. I was asked, what about it? Well, I agree with her political philosophical or religious views. Her religious views. I hope he gets a wellness check because if he's not drinking, then there's something seriously wrong with them. Right? Kirk, have you, now you've been around the block. I've spent my whole life in nightclubs. I can't fathom it, Jimmy. I cannot fathom it because who's the guy in the wheelchair, Madison Cawthorne that said people were offering him to do coke at parties, people that he looked up to. So I don't know which Republican, but I would bet it's Lindsey Graham. I would have bet it was Lindsey Graham. I would have bet. He's like a guy whose mouth still works at that sex party. He's a beautiful, yeah, anyway. He don't have blow. What happened? Were we really getting blow from Venezuela? You know, I think he drinks because we let him down. That's what I, we won't go in. We won't, we're against the war in Iran. And we didn't put boots on the ground in Venezuela yet. And that's why I think he's drinking because we really don't. I thought we were going to get the boots on the ground. Get some murals. But all those murals are in Iran. They got murals. I just bought a carpet for five bucks. Remember he was, he went to Iraq and I got a carpet for five bucks. Yeah. Okay. Uh, that's, that's, let's Lindsey Graham, but she's a public official. She has to do this. You can't change the law because you disagree with it. She went to jail. She should have, I think it's a dividing moment in his presidency. Ronald Reagan went to the Berlin wall and he said, tear down this wall. He didn't say, could you make it lower? Biggest thing. You make it a lot lower. By the way, pretty sure Ronald Reagan was when they instituted sanctuary cities. The Republicans did. Yes. To lower your goddamn wages. So like he was there for this. I know. He don't remember what happened. You could possibly ever do to the mid east is take this regime down and there's weakest they've ever been since 1979. Mr. President, you can do it. I hope you will do it. And if you do, if you do it, this is Reagan. Okay. This is Reagan. That's what I, that's what I, I think he was trying to say plus and he, his eyes look hammered. He looks hammered. And when he says, this is, this is Reagan. I think he meant to say plus. So it's Reagan who instituted sanctuary cities plus we're getting rid of them. He is hammered. Guy should hammer. He is, he's on something. I mean, we've made fun of Kamala Harris when she was obviously on taking too many Xanax. And so we got to, we got to, we got to bring it to I don't want to be optimistic, Jimmy, but are we not going to have war in Iran? Cause he has not been the same since the first day of not having war in Iran. I know he's been different. No kidding. That's why I trust what Professor Zhang said to me because he said Russia and China helped Iran go through Starlink and track all those massads that were starting the BLM riots, but worse because they were shooting at cops and shit. So that's probably why we didn't go in. If I had to guess why is because they knew, because they knew they killed all the violent actors. So that's who was keeping it going. He was really depressed. He was like, no, we stand with you. Yeah. So they got, so do you think they successfully weeded out them most, if not all of the Mossad violent actors that were making the protest violent? I'm not even sure Professor Zhang is even a professor. I was unclear. I think he's just a high school teacher, but apparently that's open news that's known pretty well known. He told me China and Israel are very close. I know it might seem like they're against each other to peasants, but they're cool. But China and Russia helped with that Iran thing and they traced them through the Starlink. He was very specific. It's on the episode of Derp with Karp. And okay, the coincidences were I heard about the Venezuelan interfering with our elections thing, which sent like nonsense early on and he brought that up. And he said, how would Maduro be there unless him and his wife are both kidnapped unless he's in on it. And then this guy is upset because they killed all those Kurds that the Mossad ran. It was mostly Kurds doing that. Do you know that Mossad run Kurds? No, I didn't know that. Professor Zhang again, let's what maybe he's a Chinese spy that's just giving me information. I don't give a shit. It looks like it's bearing out. Does it not? What? Uh. Oi, I don't want any trouble. That's all. Dude, Lindsay, we gotta get him. We stand with you. That's such a funny clip. We stand. I gotta put that on the soundboard. We stand with you. Just get it after. Oh, where do you see the argument I had today? Oh, you were on a podcast before this, right? Okay. Who was what was the podcast? Oh, it was my friend, Lev, but but he wanted me to talk to his other friend from an institute from a think tank. Oh, about. Oh, boy, get this Jimmy. He's both a hardcore Zionist and he wants to keep Ukraine going. So like the best of both worlds. Oh my God, I wish I would have been there. That would have been fun. It was just really me yelling at someone a lot. But I feel very entertaining. I couldn't believe this shit they were saying. These people have no and the think tank ones are dumb as shit. Like they don't really know anything. How many of these people high up? Do you realize don't know anything because they're trained to never look at the big picture on purpose? It's a virtue. But they do say things like we should have the only standing blue water Navy. That that's they'd call it blue water Navy. I never told me Max Bumitall is a scumbag. Oh, this cabod, this cabod plant of a dude from a think tank. Oh my God. I'm like, why does it have the foreign accent? Tell me where my money should go to what kind of that's the most galling part of all. And they always hate the journalists who the establishment media also hate. Isn't that funny? It's like, really? So the establishment media hates this guy. But you also hate this guy. I think I get it. A bunch of these people are under the impression. You know how everybody hated that Joe Rogan had a podcast that did better than the news? Yes. And but couldn't somehow put together that maybe your side is so obviously wrong to anyone with less money than you at this point that that's might be why then you fucked up. They cannot get their head. It's that they have in their head like, Oh, I know it's pop. I know it's popular to say that a packs problem. I know it's really like, why do you think that is? Well, I know why do you think it is popular to say that? Oh, I know it's cool to say Ukraine's not working out. Yeah, now it is now that it's obviously not working out asshole. I said it the whole time. Yeah, we said at day one that this war is going to end on Russia's terms the way they want it. The latest whistleblower from inside TP USA. There's been a lot of whistleblowers from inside TP USA. Here's the latest. There's now we know that Erica referred she's she pretended to be upset at Candace Owens looking into their who really killed Charlie Kirk. She pretended to what made her upset about that was that people were casting aspersions on people who worked for TP USA and she called them her family. And if you you go after my family, which of course, we know they're not your family, their employees at a giant quarter billion dollar corporation, they're not your family. But that's what that was her. That's how she referred to the employees at TP USA as her family. And then we find out that they're firing everybody at the TP USA in the most disgusting ways, right? So we've already played a video that one woman when she was being fired, she was pleading for a reason and they wouldn't give her a reason why they were firing her. They just were firing her. And that's that after she got done working for weeks and weeks, if not months at 20 hours a day, making sure everything so she was certainly part of the TP US family. And she certainly worked at a high level. And they disfired her. And she was really beside herself. It was evil what they did. It was beyond distasteful or rude. It was evil. And now here's another woman who got fired because of a TP USA executive having a conversation with an Uber driver and an Uber driver implicated said this woman was saying bad things about didn't believe the official TP USA story about the assassination. So they fired her. Here she is. She's going to talk. She's going to discuss something to say. I was terminated from turning point because I am questioning the narrative of what happened to my role model and CEO, Charlie Kirk on the day of his assassination. What is being told to us in the mainstream media just really doesn't add up to me. And I'm really hopeful that one day it will. But as it stands right now, it just doesn't. And so I've been here in the background talking with people expressing how I truly feel because as an American citizen, I have the right to my freedom of speech and my freedom of thought. And I have a lot of concerns and a lot of questions about what took place that day and the events leading up to that day. It is from my own experience that you can't question the narrative and work at turning point. That is how I feel. That is how other people I've talked to feel. It goes against everything that Charlie ever stood for. Charlie was someone who did question things who did challenge the narrative. And I know that if anything, anything at all were to have happened to myself or another employee or any other peer within the turning point family, that Charlie would be doing the same thing if we were brutally assassinated in the way that he was. He would have never lived it down. And that is what I'm standing by as well. I am not going to just idly sit by and hope that the truth comes to light. I'm going to take action. I'm going to ask questions. I'm going to talk to other people. And I refuse to apologize for having my own freedom of thought, which is something that Charlie ingrained in me and so many other young people. So really the purpose of me coming on here and speaking with you today is to just bring light to the situation of the treatment happening inside the organization. All of these people who have been terminated were the most hardworking, loyal, honest employees that turning point has ever had. And I know that because I've actually been at turning point longer than most people. You can, that's public record. You can see it for yourself on these job websites. Turning points average length of employment is about a year and a half to two. And so to be there for almost five years is actually quite some time. I've seen the media and marketing team, for example, turnover at least twice, consuming of about 40 people. And so I know that these people have been some of the most loyal, hardworking and honest individuals to ever pass through the organization because I've been there, done that and seen it all. I'm doing this for them. And I'm doing this for my friends who I consider family who are still there in hopes that they will start to receive better treatment by the leadership there because nobody deserves to be let go without cause. And frankly, it's a loss for turning point. We're all going to be better off because of this, because we have removed ourselves from an environment that was no longer serving us. And in my opinion, no longer serving the Lord, which was Charlie's entire intention. So, Ben, what's your reaction to that video and the fact that they've turned turning point into the exact opposite thing that Charlie Kirk was about, which was about freedom of thought? Ask me question everything. And now they're firing summarily people without cause because they just don't think exactly the way Erica Kirk does. What's your response? Well, first I find that woman imminently believable. Yes. Like, you know, you get a sense when someone's talking whether you believe them or not. That's why I don't believe anything Erica Kirk says. You just get this sense when someone's talking, you whether they're full of it or not. And I find that woman very believable right there, all relate. So, I took everything she said, I actually watched that video about 10 times before I talked about it last night. And I, the conclusion I came to was that Charlie had lost complete control of the organization. And he was, he had become an impediment to the mission of the people who he initially surrounded himself with, but who had squeezed him out of operational control over his own organization. He didn't have control over his messaging. He didn't have control over his schedule. He didn't have, he lost control of absolutely every aspect of TPUSA by the time he passed away. And so finally, he just had to be squeezed out for good. And you would think, I mean, to me, it seems that the people at TPUSA, not only are they corrupt and probably, probably criminally corrupt, they're definitely covering up what happened at the assassination. But they're some of the dumbest people in the world because of how badly everything they're saying and doing looks to normal people who aren't on the take, right? And so, did they really think they were going to be able to fire their most loyal employees in such a heinous way without cause and have it not blow back on them? So, I mean, what do you, do you have any special take on how bad they are just at PR? Well, all you have to do is look. I mean, they could have come out and really taken control of the narrative initially as soon as they realized people didn't buy the official Fed Slop narrative right out of the gate. They, you know, TPUSA had every opportunity to come out and say, look, we've got a lot of different camera angles. We're going to edit this down so it's not gory. We don't want to disrespect Charlie's legacy, but we'll let you know absolutely everything everybody was doing every step of the way. When the widow is lying and getting caught lying over and over and over again, and I believe she was, obviously, I don't have access to her personal conversations, but, you know, I believe the reporting that she's being dishonest. It raises the specter that everybody around her is also being dishonest because none of them are calling her out. You know, Andrew Colvette, who is the lead spokesperson and frankly doing a horrific job, but he's the lead spokesperson. Yeah. He's allowing Erica Kirk to lie about conversations he supposedly had about Twitter messages he put out, and she's just running over him with the bus and he's not stopping it. And it makes her look bad. It makes the entire organization look bad. I've talked to employees about how the employees are treated, how they're paid. It's a nightmare below the upper, upper levels, the highest levels of TPSA. The employees don't feel like they're being respected, listened to, believed, or heard in any manner whatsoever. Hey, become a premium member. Go to jimidorecomedy.com. Sign up. It's the most affordable premium program in the business. All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McCrae. He can be found at mikemacrae.com. That's it for this week. You be the best you can be and I'll keep being me. Do not freak out.