Unexplainable

Who's afraid of big, bad Yellowstone?

23 min
Jan 5, 20263 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

This episode debunks the popular myth that Yellowstone is on the verge of a catastrophic super-eruption, explaining why volcanologists are confident such an event is not imminent. While super-eruptions pose minimal near-term risk, the episode explores other genuine hazards at Yellowstone including earthquakes and unpredictable steam explosions.

Insights
  • Yellowstone's geological record shows long quiet periods between eruptions (70,000 years since last lava flow, ~1 million years between super-eruptions), indicating the system is currently dormant rather than actively brewing
  • Seismic monitoring and crystal analysis of ancient magma provide volcanologists with tools to detect pre-eruption thermal events, allowing them to confidently rule out imminent super-volcanic activity
  • The sensationalized narrative about Yellowstone poses a real problem by distracting public attention from actual, predictable hazards like earthquakes and steam explosions that could occur in our lifetime
  • Steam explosions at Yellowstone remain largely unpredictable despite monitoring efforts, presenting a genuine but underappreciated safety challenge compared to the mythologized super-eruption scenario
  • Resource constraints and cultural preservation concerns limit the deployment of monitoring equipment across all geothermal features, creating a 'whack-a-mole' approach to hazard detection
Trends
Shift in scientific communication toward correcting public misconceptions about low-probability catastrophic eventsIncreased use of geophysical monitoring (seismic, magnetic, gravity, electrical) to understand subsurface volcanic systems in real-timeGrowing tension between scientific instrumentation needs and preservation of natural landscape aesthetics in protected areasRecognition that media narratives about existential risks can misdirect public concern away from more probable, actionable hazardsAdvancement in crystal-based paleothermometry as a tool for understanding magma chamber history and eruption precursors
Topics
Volcanic eruption prediction and monitoringYellowstone geothermal hazardsSeismic wave analysis and subsurface imagingSteam explosion mechanics and predictionMagma chamber thermal eventsGeological record interpretationPublic risk perception and science communicationHydrothermal system pressure dynamicsEarthquake hazards in the Intermountain WestGeothermal monitoring equipment deploymentVolcanic crystal analysis and datingNatural disaster preparednessLandscape preservation versus scientific instrumentationBiscuit Basin hydrothermal explosion (July 2024)Volcanology research methodology
Companies
Vox Media
Produces and distributes the Unexplainable podcast as part of its podcast network
Microsoft
Advertised Microsoft 365 Copilot AI assistant for workplace productivity applications
Apple
Mentioned in sponsor segment regarding announcement of MacBook Neo laptop
People
Mike Poland
Scientist in charge of Yellowstone Volcano Observatory; primary expert interviewed about volcanic hazards and monitoring
Brad Pinkerton
Host and producer of Unexplainable podcast episode
Quotes
"These things just aren't true. I'll be honest, this was news to me."
Brad PinkertonEarly in episode
"We can look at what's happening beneath the surface and understand whether or not we're brewing, we're getting ready for an eruption. And we know that's not the case at Yellowstone."
Mike PolandMid-episode
"I think it causes us to focus on the wrong things. Emphasizing something that is literally one in a million chance."
Mike PolandLate episode
"It's almost like a whack-a-mole game, right? We know biscuit basin blew, black diamond pool and biscuit basin blew. So we'll go run out there and we'll put a bunch of stuff in area, black diamond pool."
Mike PolandDiscussion of monitoring challenges
"Yellowstone is stunning, right? Iconic landscapes, charismatic megafauna. Boiling water is shooting out of the ground at a lot of places with some regularity. That's amazing. It sells itself."
Mike PolandClosing discussion
Full Transcript
Support for this show comes from the Working Forests initiative. The working forest industry is committed to planting more trees than they harvest. More than 1 billion seedlings are planted in US working forests every year. From biologists to GIS analysts, hiring managers, accountants, working forest professionals have dedicated their focus towards sustainability, using their expertise to help ensure a healthy future for America's forests. They say they don't just plan for the future. They plant it. You can learn more at workingforestsinitiative.com. Last week Apple announced its cheapest laptop ever. And the wildest thing about it is it's really kind of very good. This week on the Vertcast we're talking all about how Apple managed to make the MacBook Neo as good and cheap as it is and whether the rest of the PC market needs to be in just a full blown panic about it. All that plus the latest on what's going on with Live Nation and Ticketmaster, what's going on with the Anthropic and the Department of War and the Future of Xbox on the Vertcast wherever you get podcasts. When I was a kid I remember hearing about Yellowstone. I remember hearing that it was a national park that had big volcanic system with lots of geysers. And I remember hearing this really scary story about it. A story that Mike Poland, the scientist in charge of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, basically knows by heart. He hears versions of it all the time. You would have heard that Yellowstone has had incomprehensibly big eruptions. Yes. It's true. You may also have heard that Yellowstone is brewing and stirring away and one day is going to have another one of these eruptions and we don't know when it could be tomorrow. And if it does that, then it could mean the end of the human race. I may be pushing things a little far. I hear that a lot. And these things just aren't true. I'll be honest, this was news to me. I called up Mike to ask him, what's the deal with Yellowstone? Right? Will there be an eruption any day? Why don't we know? Etc. And instead he told me that there is a lot that we don't know about predicting volcanoes. We wound up doing a whole episode on just that subject. But when it comes to Yellowstone specifically and eruptions in the near future, scientists like Mike have a lot of confidence. We can look at what's happening beneath the surface and understand whether or not we're brewing, we're getting ready for an eruption. And we know that's not the case at Yellowstone. So Yellowstone is not a threat in terms of volcanic activity in the immediate future. So, this is unexplainable. I'm Brad Pinkerton. And today on the show, why Mike is so confident that, at least in this one respect, the Yellowstone system is pretty explainable. But also, Michael tell us some mysteries about Yellowstone that he would like to solve. So, if it's not true that Yellowstone is going to erupt, evidently, or it could erupt at any time, where did that idea come from in the first place? So the discovery of Yellowstone as a really, really massive volcanic system was really kind of late 50s or early 60s when Geologists started looking at the region and understanding the rocks that were there. It has been known to be a volcanic region for a long time. Then Geologists started to identify the rocks, started to become more familiar with the rocks in the area and realize that some of the rocks they were seeing weren't lava flows. It was compressed ash. And all of this started to sort of come together as a story that Yellowstone has had some really, really big eruptions. The ash was so thick that it welded itself together. It became incredibly dense and it would have swept across the landscape for, who knows, 100 miles, something like that, from its source, just sort of sweeping the area clean. These were really, really big eruptions that also would have had an impact on climate because it would have put a tremendous amount of ash into the atmosphere that would have reflected sunlight and caused some cooling. And so that's a fantastic story. Will that happen again one day? Maybe. It's hard to tell. And if it does happen in the future, none of us that are on Earth now are going to be around to be able to know whether or not it happened, right? So in some ways, I find it kind of a funny question. Mike told me there are a couple things that make them so confident here. One is just looking at Yellowstone's geological record. This is not something that's going off all the time. You walk into the Yellowstone landscape and it doesn't look like Hawaii where there's nothing growing because these lava flows are so recent. And clearly the stuff that had come out was relatively old. That doesn't mean it's inactive. It doesn't mean it won't happen again at some point in the future. It will have episodes of lava flows that may occur, but the last one of those was 70,000 years ago. It can have really massive explosions. Maybe once every million years, maybe slightly less than that, but it is clear that this system was not just constantly going off all the time that there were long pauses between So we appear to be in one of those periods of quiet, not in the middle of these episodes of volcanism. And the geological record also holds clues to help us understand when we might need to start worrying. So for example, if you look at old lava from Yellowstone, it's apparently full of tiny crystals. Um, those crystals grew back when the lava was magma, so inside the earth. And they grew in layers. You can think of them almost like tree ring layers. And just like tree ring layers can tell you stuff about by gone weather or by gone water levels, the layers on these volcanic crystals record moments of intense heat down in the magma chamber, for example. So we can use the crystals as a clue of what the magma chamber might look like through time. And what we generally see is that there is some sort of like thermal event, like a heating event prior to eruptions. Makes sense, right? Right. It would make sense that you'd be like, oh, right before there was an eruption, things got hot. Yeah, things got kicked up, things got jumpstarted. And apparently volcanologists can monitor a system like Yellowstone to see if that's happening currently, to see if heat is coming in to jumpstart an eruption in this way. You can basically do something that some kind of like taking an MRI of the earth. You can do that with magnetic, and gravity, the most common way to do it is seismic waves. So seismic waves pass through the earth. If they encounter something hot and maybe partially molten, they're going to slow down. Okay. And if they hit something really solid and cold, they're going to speed up. And we can measure the travel times of seismic waves as they pass through the subsurface and we can put a map together of how fast things are moving through the subsurface. When they peer down under Yellowstone, they can see that it's definitely hot down there, but not so hot that they anticipate a super volcanic eruption. Essentially, it's not melted enough. Imagine a lava cake that is like, I don't know, 10 years old. And a lot of that chocolate just is not flowing anymore. There might be some pieces that are still maybe not 10 years old, maybe 10 is a bit much. But maybe it's a weak old cake. Maybe it's a weak old. And so when you slice into it, nothing moves. There's no flowage there because it's 80% solid. Now, if you took Yellowstone and injected a lot of heat somehow, if magma came up from below to heat up the whole system, it would be like putting your lava cake back in the oven. That would melt that gooey center and you'd be back to having your lava cake. That's maybe a good analogy for Yellowstone. We haven't seen that rejuvenation event. We're dealing with a system that is a couple of week old lava cake. And this couple of weeks old lava cake is probably not going to end the world in a fiery nightmare of ash in lava. So this is why Mike is so prepared to lay people's concerns on this one. Based on all the information that he and his fellow volcanologists have at their disposal, he really does think we can check death by a super volcanic Yellowstone explosion off of our list of imminent apocalypse scenarios. But before you breathe too easily, there are still lots of other ways for Yellowstone to kill you. The world moves fast. You work day, even faster, pitching products, drafting reports, analyzing data. Microsoft 365 co-pilot is your AI assistant for work built into word, Excel, PowerPoint, and other Microsoft 365 apps you use helping you quickly, right, analyze, create, and summarize. So you can cut through clutter and clear path to your best work. Learn more at Microsoft.com slash M365 co-pilot. Hey everybody, a steadhurned in here. I wanted to let you know that Vox media is returning to South by Southwest and Austin for live tapings of your favorite podcasts. Join us for March 13th through March 15th for live tapings of pivot, tefytox, Professor G's markets. Where should we begin with Esther Parell and the special live taping of today explained hosted by yours truly. The Vox media podcast stage will also feature sessions from Brunei Brown and Adam Grant, Marcus Brownlee, Keith Lee, Vivian Tew, Robin Arzone, and more. Visit VoxMedia.com slash South by Southwest to pre-register and get a special discount on your South by Southwest innovation badge. That's VoxMedia.com slash South by Southwest. Hope to see you there. You come barging in here asking me to contribute money to a volcano relief fund for crack a toll. In our conversation about Yellowstone, Mike told me, sure, a volcanic super eruption maybe does not need to keep us up at night. But that doesn't mean that Yellowstone is this totally benign place. There are other hazards that could happen in our lifetime that we might want to think about instead. Hazards like, for example. Strong earthquakes. The largest earthquake ever recorded in the Inter-Mountain West was just a few miles west of Yellowstone National Park. It was a magnitude 7.3 in 1959. And it caused an entire mountain side to collapse. Oh my God. And that mountain side rushed through a campground at about midnight and it killed a lot of people, over 2,000 people died. It dammed a river and it created a new lake. And the Army Corps of Engineers and some local folks had to get in there very, very fast and build a temporary spillway. Because if they hadn't done that, the debris dam could have failed catastrophically and then you would have had a flood going down this river and then taking up some towns downstream. Oh my God. That's pretty consequential. So that's hazard number one. The other one, a steam explosion like what we saw in July of 2024. Wait, what is a steam explosion? So you are dealing with a Yellowstone, a very poorly engineered pressure cooker or Instapot or depends on your generation I suppose, which analogy you want to use. There is a lot of boiling water just beneath the surface. It is flowing through conduits that are constantly having minerals precipitate out into them and so they're getting clogged and pressure builds. And that creates a condition where you can have water flashing to steam and when that happens you have rapid expansion and kaboom. Taking you to Wyoming now, Yellowstone National Park Rangers closed the biscuit basin area today after a hydrothermal explosion happened this morning. This would happen on July 23rd, 2024 at Biscuit Basin, only about 2.5 miles a zoo from Old Faithful. There was a really dramatic steam explosion. Sending a black clue of steam and mud up to the sky. No one was injured fortunately, but there were a lot of people that were in the area and had to run away from rock and mud, boiling water that was flying all over the place. Scientists at Yellowstone tell us that this was a random event without warning. That kind of thing happens almost all the time in Yellowstone. This annually, there are explosions, maybe not that dramatic and certainly that was one of the best viewed ones because it was in the summertime and a well-visited geyser basin during the day on a beautiful blue sky day. But that kind of thing has been a hazard we've been trying to emphasize for a long time and it's a hazard any place, any volcanic carry where you've got a lot of boiling water just beneath the surface. Is that a predict, like you can't say? That's tough. The same way that it's hard to predict when your pressure cooker is going to go off. Yeah, right. If your pressure cooker has a crack in it or something, is it going to work? Is it not going to work? I don't know. Maybe it'll boil up. Maybe it won't. It's possible that there is some indication and we just haven't been able to see it yet because we're either not measuring in the right place or we're not looking at the right parameters. So it's possible that there are precursors. You don't know that. Are you trying to figure that out? Oh, absolutely. The process for trying to figure out what might trigger a steam explosion involves a bunch of equipment set up to detect and measure things like low frequency rumblings or how the ground deforms, so how it swells or shrinks as hot rock changes beneath it. They're taking seismic readings as well. All this stuff where the hope is that they could look through this data and say, oh, when there is a lot of rumbling or say a lot of deformation that looks like this or looks like that, those tend to be signs that steam is about to explode. So far, they don't have the steaming gun, but Mike says that might be because their equipment hasn't been close enough to the site of any given explosion. Or he says it's also possible that they just haven't looked at the right data yet, like maybe as hot water pools just below the surface preparing for a steam explosion, there could be an electrical charge that builds up somehow. So maybe we should be looking at the electrical activity, the conductivity, the resistivity of the subsurface, basically passing electricity through this subsurface and seeing how well it moves. Or maybe we should be looking at magnetic properties of the materials, which will change depending on how hot it is or how much water is moving around. Or maybe there will be changes in the temperature of the spring. Now the challenge here is that we don't have many examples. We have any examples where we've been measuring these things out of place that's blown up. Right? Sure, sure. You know, it's almost like a whack-a-mole game, right? We know biscuit basin blue, black diamond pool and biscuit basin blue. So we'll go run out there and we'll put a bunch of stuff in area, black diamond pool. And two years from now some other pool will blow up. Right? And then we'll run over there and do some... Why don't you have equipment at every pool? A couple years after that. Limited equipment. Yeah, okay. If I wanted to pay $7 trillion in a trillion, you could put equipment at every pool. Well, but there's also... There's also... There's not just a financial cost to that. There is a cultural cost. I mean, do you want to go to Yellowstone and see wires and... Soap panels and batteries and all that stuff all over the place? Yes. No. That's actually my dream. Pave paradise. Have a parking lot, yeah. At the end of our conversation I asked Mike why this story about an imminent Yellowstone super-arruption bothers him so much. Like, what is the harm he sees? And having a story like this out in the world. I think it causes us to focus on the wrong things. Emphasizing something that is the literally one in a million chance. I find it disappointing because it's like... Yellowstone is stunning, right? Iconic landscapes, charismatic megafauna, right? Bison, elk, bears, wolves or my. Boiling water is shooting out of the ground at a lot of places with some regularity. That's amazing. It sells itself. But why turn it into this boogie man? So I think I find that lazy. And if I'm really going to reach kind of disrespectful to the landscape and to the place. And I do think it distracts from things that are really consequential. So I asked Mike to tell me what he finds consequential about Yellowstone. What it is like to be there. Well, this is the amazing thing, right? It varies so much in this small corner of Wyoming. You will smell pine forest and not be able to see much in any direction because you're in the middle of a really dense forest. And then you'll walk out into a meadow. And there'll be a herd of bison in the meadow or across a really cold mountain river. There's a pack of wolves running by. Something like that. And then you pass around the corner and you're hit by the smell of rotten eggs and a weird plume. And as you approach it, there's a rainbow-colored spring that's steaming and right next to it boiling water, shooting up out of the ground 100 feet in the air. I got to go to Yellowstone. It is a spectacular landscape with amazing number of stories to tell. If you want to hear more about volcanoes and you want to hear more from my Poland, please listen to our episode about the quest to build a magma observatory. It is called The View from Inside a Volcano and we will link to it in the transcript. This episode was produced by me, Bird Pinkerton. It was edited by Joanna Salatarov and Julia Lungoria. Erica Huang did the mixing and the sound design. No, I'm Hassan Feldruth, the music. Melissa Hirsch checked our facts, Jorge Just, Meredith Hodnott, Sally Helm and Amy Padula are the fact that hedgehogs can swim. Thanks to Thomas Liu for his help and edits on this episode. And I'm always, always, always grateful to Brian Russnick for co-founding the show with me and Noam. If you have a long-held belief that you would like us to dig deeper into or if you have ever had a wild and beautiful time at Yellowstone, please tell us about it. We are at unexplainable at Vox.com and we are always open to your ideas. If you'd like to support this show and the journalism that Vox does, we would love it if you would become a Vox member. It's very easy to do. Just go to Vox.com slash members and you will get access to all of Vox's journalism as well. For those of you who have emailed us to let us know that you signed up because of unexplainable, thank you. Like, thank you very much. If you cannot join our membership though, that is okay. If you want to leave us a nice review on your podcast platform, we would appreciate that a lot. Or if you just wanted to tell someone in your life that they might want to listen to the show, that would make a real difference. Genuinely though, it just makes a big difference that you listen. So thank you. Thanks for listening all the way through to credits. And unexplainable is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. We'll be back soon with another episode about everything we don't yet know.