Summary
Armstrong and Getty discuss escalating US-Israel military operations against Iran, including strikes on infrastructure and threats of broader conflict. The hosts debate presidential authority over military decisions, analyze political responses from figures like Tucker Carlson and Gavin Newsom, and cover unrelated stories including parental negligence at a zoo and AI music trends.
Insights
- Presidential military authority remains constitutionally ambiguous in practice despite War Powers Act constraints, with single-person decision-making on existential threats raising governance questions
- Political messaging and hyperbole from leadership can create strategic ambiguity that may be intentional or counterproductive depending on negotiation objectives
- Media figures and political opponents use military escalation narratives differently based on partisan positioning, with some rooting for failure as political strategy
- Parental judgment in public safety situations reveals tension between reasonable supervision standards and the reality of parental fatigue and situational assessment
- Progressive political figures face credibility challenges when making sweeping claims about human nature and gender that contradict observable behavior
Trends
Increased congressional scrutiny of War Powers Act compliance as military operations extend beyond 60-day thresholdStrategic targeting of critical infrastructure (power plants, rail systems, oil export facilities) as economic coercion mechanism in modern conflictPolitical polarization creating divergent interpretations of same military actions as either necessary deterrence or warmongeringSocial media trends (Jessica meme, cheese-on-head challenge) as neurological interruption tactics for behavior modificationProgressive institutional advocacy focusing on gender representation as solution to systemic problems despite limited evidence of causationParenting standards and child safety enforcement becoming more legally stringent with lower thresholds for endangerment charges
Topics
US-Iran Military EscalationPresidential War Powers and Constitutional AuthorityWar Powers Act ComplianceStrategic Infrastructure TargetingPolitical Polarization and Military PolicyTucker Carlson vs Trump ConflictGavin Newsom Presidential ProspectsJennifer Siebel Newsom Progressive AdvocacyChild Endangerment Legal StandardsZoo Safety and Parental SupervisionGender Representation in LeadershipTech Company AccountabilityAI Music and Copyright IssuesSocial Media Behavior Modification TrendsParenting and Child Development
Companies
Fox News
Cited for reporting on US-Israel military operations and Iranian infrastructure strikes via correspondent Trey Yanxt
New York Post
Published Trump's response criticizing Tucker Carlson and Miranda Divine article criticizing Gavin Newsom's wife
TikTok
Platform where 'Jessica' child behavior modification trend originated and circulates
Instagram
Platform where Gavin Newsom's wife posted content about patriarchy and progressive ideology
YouTube
Platform where Mark Levin posted analysis of Gavin Newsom political prospects
CBS News
Reported on wolf attack incident at Hershey Park Zoo America in Pennsylvania
Hershey Park Zoo America
Zoo in Pennsylvania where toddler was bitten by wolf after parents were distracted by phones
People
Jack Armstrong
Co-host of the podcast discussing military escalation, politics, and parenting standards
Joe Getty
Co-host providing analysis and commentary on Iran conflict, political figures, and social trends
Katie Green
Pregnant producer contributing commentary on parenting, Gavin Newsom's wife, and social issues
Trey Yanxt
Fox News correspondent reporting on US-Israel military operations and Iranian infrastructure strikes
Tucker Carlson
Criticized Trump's Iran military plans as potentially involving nuclear weapons; Trump responded calling him low IQ
Donald Trump
Threatened to wipe out Iranian civilization; posted about military operations and responded to Tucker Carlson criticism
Gavin Newsom
California governor whose presidential prospects discussed; told fabricated story about disappeared parents at meat p...
Jennifer Siebel Newsom
Gavin Newsom's wife; progressive advocate claiming women in power would eliminate racism, greed, and misogyny
Mark Levin
Analyzed Gavin Newsom's presidential prospects and family challenges on his video podcast
Miranda Divine
Wrote critical article about Gavin Newsom's wife in New York Post
Kennedy
Referenced in discussion of presidential nuclear decision-making during Berlin Wall crisis with Soviet Union
Quotes
"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again."
Donald Trump•Early in episode
"You're an idiot. It's 39 days."
Jack Armstrong•Responding to congressman's claim Trump always backs down
"The IRGC having declared to the world, okay, in order to get our way, we're gonna bring the world economy to its knees. And Trump, replying, you wanna see an economy brought to its knees, hold my Diet Coke."
Joe Getty•Mid-episode analysis
"Every problem that we have in society right now will be fixed when women come together and partner with our male allies."
Jennifer Siebel Newsom•Documentary clip
"If the Soviet Union moves, whether you're gonna use a nuclear weapon, make that decision in a calm moment now, don't tell anybody, but you need to make that decision for yourself."
Historical advisor to Kennedy•Referenced from Ike's Bluff book discussion
Full Transcript
This is an I Heart podcast. Guaranteed human. Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. I'm strong and getty. And now, here's, I'm strong and getty. Depends what they do. This is a critical period. They have a period of, well, till tomorrow at eight o'clock. It's all hat no cattle, right? I mean, he's blustering, he's threatening, and yet he always backs down. Tackle the hardest problems and execute the toughest missions. This president is about results. What the president is doing is threatening war crimes and the American people already recognize that this illegal war of choice is a big mistake. That's fine as an argument. I'm perfectly okay with you making that argument. Anybody making that argument, that these are war crimes, we ought to debate this, blah, blah, blah. Who was the guy who said he always backs down? Who was that? That was a Harvard grad, former US Marine, Congressperson from Blue Massachusetts, saying something so patently laughable. Can't believe he said it out loud, but again, he's in a safe district. He's just signaling to his core. Plus, at a time of war, to say, our commander in chief always backs down, are you daring him to do it? What do you want? Yeah, some of the clearly openly rooting for America to fail because that means Trump's has failed among Democrats is absolutely disgusting. If you want to make a principled argument that we have the duty to listen to that, absolutely bring it on. As a matter of fact, at some point, I'd like to get to the fact that an impressive number of Congress people are starting to rumble that, hey, we're getting close to 60 days and the War Powers Act is pretty clear. We need to do some voting pretty soon. So that's all in the works. But yes, he always backs down. You're an idiot. It's 39 today, 39 days. So we got a little while. It might not make any differences. Trump posted this morning, a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don't want that to happen, but it probably will. Unbelievable statement from the President of the United States. I mean, just makes his other statements that were unbelievable seem like nothing to me. I mean, that's just a whole civilization will die tonight. That's a hell of a threat. Now, somebody brought up earlier the idea that should one guy be making this decision or should Congress vote on it? Yeah, I would say on the topic of wiping out an entire civilization, probably Congress should be voting on that as opposed to one person making a decision. As I said, if we don't reckon in a serious way with the question of what's declaring a war or what is a war and when should it be declared now, we never will. Again, and you might as well just take an eraser to the Constitution. Of course, well, I got a tangent on that, but I'll save my tangent. Let's listen to a little of Tree Enxt reporting from Fox and Friends, some really interesting stuff here. What the president knows and what the public knows are two very different things. There are a lot of conversations and preparations going on behind the scenes, even as we are talking right now, a very high ranking source just sent me a screenshot of the president's post here and is typing right now. There is an understanding that both Israel and the United States as Operation Epic Fury continues are working side by side on an hourly basis to prepare a variety of contingency plans on the battlefield. I wonder if in reality there's no chance, like Trump isn't even considering following through on his truth social post. Or he's already given up completely on negotiations and is just pretending that he's still engaged to dupe the Iranians and he launches in 10 minutes from now, which is, while we're speaking these words, far prior to the deadline. And does take out all the power plants and bridges and everything like he promised? Before the human shields get in place, I don't know. It's all on the table. More from Troy Ynxt. But let's think about what's happened over the past 24 hours. The past 48 hours as well, you had B2 bombers fly from the United States to Iranian territory and drop bunker buster bombs on the outskirts of Tehran, targeting senior commanders and an underground bunker. I am told just right now, a senior Israeli official confirming to Fox News that the Israelis have started strikes against Iranian rail infrastructure. Remember earlier today, the Israelis warned civilians to stay off the trains in Iran. They have started to target the bridges of the rail system in Iran as we speak. Additionally, you have these strikes overnight against Karg Island, the largest export facility in Iranian territory, accounting for around 90% of Iran's oil exports. And you have ongoing US and Israeli strikes against Iranian military infrastructure. Wow, I might be changing my mind. I was thinking that this is all a diversion. They got all the people around the bridges and the power plants in Tehran and everything. And we're gonna take the straight of Hormuz, which has been the focal point over the first 30 some days. We're gonna take Karg Island, we're gonna take it while you're distracted over there. Okay, now what's your bargaining position? We open the straight backup. But- See, I don't think that would open the straight backup. There's just too many ways to hit it from too many different places. You've got to get them to capitulate to the point that they say, I don't wanna hit any boats anymore, I won't do it. But Iran taken out, or Israel rather, taken out to the trains and everything like that, this might just be the day. Like you said, Trump has realized there's no negotiating with these people. Let's do it. Let's take this country out. The trains, the bridges, the power plants, they're gonna have nothing by the end of the day. Where I would put it like this, the IRGC having declared to the world, okay, in order to get our way, we're gonna bring the world economy to its knees. And Trump, replying, you wanna see an economy brought to its knees, hold my Diet Coke. As I said earlier, at what point does the Iranian on the street, the average Iranian on the street who hates the regime, the Mullahs, and is willing to take a lot of pain because the pain is less than having thugs come into your house at night and take dad out and shoot him in the street, which they've been living with for half a century. At what point did they say, you're destroying our whole country, there's gonna be nothing left? And they turn on this, I wonder. Well, it's gonna be percentages. Number is gonna go from 10 to 20% depending on the destruction and doesn't reach critical mass, who knows, unknowable. I am, God, there's a lot of different directions this could go today. I was gonna say, at some point, I mean, we can keep going with Trey Yanks if you want, he's terrific. At some point, I'd like to hear from Tuck Tuck. Yeah, we'll definitely get to that, we have to get to that. Let's hear Trey again. What we are looking at right now is a staging operation. The United States and Israel are preparing if a deal is not made, there will be an increase in strikes against the Iranian regime. The president described it as power plant day and bridge day to go after this critical infrastructure inside of Iran. So, and then Trey goes on to say that the energy sites are Iran's Achilles heel, this could really force their hand. I don't know if anything forces your hand when you're a religious zealot. Right. So that's the problem there. Here's what Tucker Carlson says is likely to happen in the next 24 hours. If you work in the White House, we're in the US military, now is the time to say no, absolutely not, and say it directly to the president, no. In case you're thinking about using some weapon and mass destruction against the population of Iran in whose name we liberated Iran, we killed their religious leader for their benefit. Do you remember that this was last month? Those people who are in direct contact with the president need to say, no, I'll resign. I'll do whatever I can do legally to stop this because this is insane. And if given the order, I'm not carrying it out. Figure out the codes on the football yourself. That's a follow up to Tucker saying that President Trump is considering nuclear war on Iran. That's part of the plan. And that the leaders in the White House need to say no to the president. Trump has responded in an interview with the New York Post saying, Tucker's a low IQ person that has absolutely no idea what's going on. He calls me all the time. I don't return his calls. I don't deal with him. I like dealing with smart people, not fools. Okay. All right. First of all, Trump is not contemplating using nuclear weapons on the population of Iran. That is absolute conspiracy clickbait, which is the business Tucker's now in, which is very disappointing to me. And to call him a low IQ individual is ridiculous. He's brilliant. He's just twisted. So anyway, the two of you settle that on your own. I don't, you know, I'm like the parent. You two want to fight? Fine. I'm going to the other room. So for some reason, it reminded me of this. I'm re-listening to a book I read years ago called Ike's Bluff and just it fits in with a lot of stuff that's going on right now to my mind. Anywho, there is a portion of the book where they talk about when Kennedy became president and it was shortly thereafter that the wall went up in Berlin, the Berlin wall, and the Soviet Union was getting very aggressive. This was just months after Kennedy becomes president. And he was very concerned that the Soviet Union was about to make a push to take more of Europe. And that we, I mean, is an auguration address. We will bear any burden, pay any price to, you know, support freedom. So basically telling the Soviet Union, no, you ain't. So they put up the wall and it looks like they're going to get aggressive. And he is told that they have, the Soviet Union has so many tanks and troops, there's no way we could stop them. And so he brought in some of his advisors and discussing the idea of using a nuclear weapon to stop them. If the Soviet Union starts to try to take the rest of Germany, you know, or move on Europe, do we use a nuclear weapon? And his advisor told him, and this is something, this is why we got to elect people with brains that work and have good judgment. Because it ultimately, Congress or no Congress, it comes down to one guy making this decision if the S ever really hits the fan. There's just no getting around it. Kennedy was told by former secretary of state under Truman, you need to make that decision right now. Don't wait until it's that moment. Decide right now in your mind, if the Soviet Union moves, whether you're gonna use a nuclear weapon, make that decision in a calm moment now, don't tell anybody, but you need to make that decision for yourself. And I thought, holy crap. And that is the situation you can end, every president can end up in. I don't know if every president at some point does that. If China does this, will I use a nuclear gun? Cause you should make that decision when you're calm. Boy, it feels like we ought to have, I don't know a YouTube video or some sort of coaching session. So now you're president, welcome to the office. Here's things you should do to get you ready for the big decisions you're going to make. How about that advice? I don't mean the curtains in the oval office. You keep it jovial. How about that advice that I think every president's faced within a certain level? Yeah, I think that's actually really good advice. Yeah, make that decision when you're calm. If X happens, what is Y? Right, you can always reconsider in the light of, you know, the specifics, but yeah, I think that's probably a good idea. And so I wonder where Trump is on that, on all of this. Well, I guess we're going to find out in a couple of hours. If you're listening to this podcast tomorrow. In the future. Iran, all that civilization may already be gone as promised by Donald Trump. I think he's just going to blow up some power plants. I think the civilization will still be there. With all due respect to his never ending hyperbole. Well, you can't blame a guy for what is the whole thing with Trump, the people take him literally, but not seriously or seriously, but not literally. Yeah, take him seriously, but not literally. Well, it depends on which side of Trump you're on. I'm just, I'm, I'm, I'm offering some advice to the good folks. But if a, the, the leader of the most powerful country that has ever existed on earth, that has the ability to blow up the entire world says, a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. He could at least pay some attention to that. In the history of threats, that's a good one. Oh my God. What's your reaction to that? Text line 415-295-KFTC. Armstrong and Getty. Jessica. Jessica. Where are you, Jessica? Jessica. Jessica. Jessica. Jessica. Where are you, Jessica? Now, Katie, can you explain what that was? It's this trend going around on TikTok, where apparently if your child is screaming and having a fit and you yell, Jessica, where are you, Jessica? The child stops. Now, and I assume obviously they don't need to be named Jessica for this to work in theory. I don't know. So is it just something? Well, just yelling, would yelling anything work? Is that the trick here? Or is there something about the sounds, Jessica, that are more startling and ear-grabbing than other sounds? Zero signs behind it. It's got a heart and a gut. I don't know. It's the internet. Nobody will be talking about this by 4 in the afternoon. It is an interesting question. Just yelling anything might be the thing. It seems to me I've heard a different version of this, where if you yell something nonsensical, it will so change the set of the brain, just the which neurons are firing, that the whole I'm upset and I'm a kid, so I'm yelling will become, wait, what was that? What? And then interrupts the neurological flow. And is that one? I'm making up terms as I go here. And is that when you throw the slice of cheese on their head? Exactly. Oh, that one needs to come back. That was great. Exactly. Well, that's it. It's the same thing. Right. Right, right, right, right, right. Jessica, where are you? Jessica is the new slice of cheese on the head. I'm not condoning any if the animals don't like it, don't mess with them. But have you seen what they started doing that to cats with the slice of cheese? No, the cats just like stop and freak out. I would freak out. Did you just throw a slice of cheese on my head? It's like the craft stuff that's super sticky. I don't know how to react to this. Precisely. Yeah. Yeah, you stop what you're doing. I had a cheese trend. I had a moment yesterday. You'll be this soon enough, Katie. OK. As Katie Green is with child, if you're new to the show. As coming out of the gym and there was a coming into the gym and there was a mom coming out and she had a stroller with like a little kid. And then she's holding another kid's hand. She got the bag over her shoulder. She's trying to hold her bag full of stuff and get the kid out. And the kid is like distracted and pushed. So for whatever reason, I just love moms or dads, parents doing the deal, just watching them just like because that is such a hassle. And I just love people doing that. I just I think it's fantastic that there are still enough people that are willing to do that and do it willingly and get so much satisfaction out of just doing the deal of being a parent. Yeah. And and I realized I might be because I'd been listening to a podcast of people that were childless and all this sort of you have no idea the satisfaction you get out of that. If you're childless and you look at that as a hassle. Any time I see a dad actively engaged in his child's lives, it makes me so happy. What if you let your kids run off in the zoo and get bit by wolves? We've got to do that story. Have you heard that one? That doesn't sound like a hypothetical to me. Did this happen? I'm not sure I agree with the law on this. We'll have to get to that story a little bit later. We got some new Gavin Newsom's wife stuff, too. Oh, goody. Armstrong and Getty. Trump has threatened to end a civilization. In fact, he is vowed he will end a civilization. We'll talk about that more later. Also, is it a crime to let your toddler be attacked by wolves? I say maybe not. Gets to that story coming up a little bit. It's not good parenting. I think we can all agree on that. Also, I have the problem of my shoes are so much too big for me. I keep almost stepping out of them and it's really become a problem today. I bought this happen. I bought them used online and and they're just they're like two sizes way too big. Oh, boy, time to start a go fund me for Jack. Used shoes are like 12s and I wear a 10 and a half or 11. So did you just want them really bad and figured you'd make that work? Yeah, I've bought lots of used shoes, but these are really not even close to the right size. You're charming. So it's one word for it. I was watching Mark Alperin's video podcast yesterday afternoon. He he was playing the same. Gavin Newsom's wife clip we played yesterday. That was the Instagram post from the weekend where she talks about the patriarchy. It's part of her new documentary that she's forced feeding to California schools for her profit to indoctrinate the little children into post modernism, AKA Neo Marxism. And she uses all the hot. Graduate school Marxist terms when she talks all the time. It's so annoying. But Mark Alperin's take is he thinks there's a real good chance Gavin doesn't run. And this is why just because it would be so difficult for the whole family, she'd be a big focal point because he was talking about that Miranda Divine article I was reading from in the New York Post, which was pretty harsh on Newsom's wife, deservedly so, in my opinion. But but, you know, you think about running for president, you think that man, my wife being attacked in major publications all day long. Do I want to do that? Well, and she, if you're not aware of her act, she is a near cartoonish, like not cartoonish as much as like portrayed in a movie. Rich, hot, entitled, utterly overconfident advocate of progressive ideals. I mean, like seriously, she's the devil wears Prada style, you know, Hollywood central cast. Throw in a dose of whatever the word would be for. You figured out a way to profit from it. Oh, yeah. And agreed ahead. Yeah, absolutely true. OK, well, this is the premise of her latest screen. This came out a couple of years ago, I guess. But there there is a treasure trove of this sort of audio. We'll start with 31 Michael, like every problem that we have in society right now will be fixed when women come together and partner with our male allies and other allies. But when more women are in the rooms, making decisions, changing the status quo and transforming not just our culture, but our society and our economy. Oh, gosh, every problem in society will be fixed when women are in the rooms with their male allies, which means fellow postmodernists, Marxists. Yeah, by the way, that's that's what that code means. But wow, wow. All of you who work in predominantly female offices, I'm sure you can report on how they are harmonious and lovely and there's never any conflict. Ms. Newsom goes on. I'll give you one example. Look at Tech at Silicon Valley. Had more women been early on in those companies or at the tables of power making decisions, I don't think we would have so much or have allowed for so much sort of bigotry, racism, misogyny and hate online. I don't think that we would have the anonymity of it. I think that there would have been a. Oh, that's unkind. That's not OK. You can't make money off of that about dividing people. Mismforming people. Wow. You know, belittling people, bullying people. I mean, again, think about who's the victims online more often than not. It's women, marginalized LGBTQ plus marginalized communities, women of color. So first of all, why do those people say bullying instead of bullying? Why don't it's very consistent? But so OK, I'll give you that misogyny is the purview of the male. I will give you that one. It's man's work. You're right. But so. Racism and greed. Bullying, bullying. That's all that's all a male thing. You wouldn't have that if women are in charge. Where did you come up with this? How did you come? I guess you ever sat around and watched little girls play just like little boys play, you know, find any of that? Ever happening? Are you kidding me? Have you seen any rallies on college campuses lately? Katie, any thoughts you'd like to hear? Listening to her makes me think she's also never been on the Internet because you would see where a lot of the slams and trolling it comes from. Oh, yeah, I hadn't even thought of that. You hear that a lot that in the high school social media world. Oh, my God. What's mean girls? It's the girls thing that the women are way harsher. But you've never watched little kids play and seen a little girl who will also say that doll is mine. Get it to me. Just like a little boy. You that that's just a boy thing. OK, fine. I don't know what you would have. It's a different form, but come on. And then racism is a guy thing. Not a girl. Are you kidding me? I know. I know it's absurd. She's like a practically a cartoon character, certainly a movie character. That's a little broadly drawn. So all the negatives of human nature are just something that men have. Women just automatically don't have it. And to the extent that they do have it there, probably it was probably forced onto them by the patriarchy. Yeah, exactly. You're nuts. They've internalized. This is the first time I've thought she's nuts. She's nuts. And this is, you know, Orwell was being a little broad when he was writing 1984 and no pun intended. But this is documentably true when it comes to the the Cultural Revolution in China, the Maoist movement. As Orwell said in 1984, it was always the women and above all the young ones who were the most pitted adherents of the party, the swallowerers of slogans, your spies and nosers out of unorthodoxy, which is precisely what Jennifer Siebel Nussence was advocating there. The if the women were in charge of the Internet, they would have nosed out the unorthodoxy. They would have swallowed the slogans as she has. She's gobbled them down. And and is more than happy to appoint herself as the noser out of unorthodoxy. I was just kind of amused by her before. She is now frightening to me. She's a scary person. Yeah, luckily she is not as smart as she thinks she is. And she doesn't understand how she comes off. She doesn't have the craftiness to be successful because as soon as people get a load of her, they'll be like, Oh my God, one of those. And she thinks it's still twenty twenty one or whatever. And George Floyd hasn't been laid to rest yet. She is still on the militant college girl front foot. But I thought she was mostly the misogyny thing. And so, you know, women have gotten the short end of the stick in a lot of different situations over the years. And we've been correcting that for a long time. But the idea that racism, greed, all that sort of stuff is a guy thing. Only and not human nature. You're crazy. Yeah, yeah, she is incredibly lacking in insight. Do you have another one? Ma, oh, that's all. Wow. OK. Well, that's that's that's more troubling than I ever even thought. Wait a minute. We do have some new ones, but it says wait on the sheet. Well, we will wait then. We've got as long as it takes, Hanson. We've got to get to the is it OK to let your kids be attacked by wolves or not? And is it a crime? Yeah. Having it as you is. As long as we're having to go at the Newsome family, a gov. Gav did something odd the other day, which will feature for you. Afterward from our friends at Rough Greens. You love your dog. You care about your dog. You want it to have a long, happy life. And that's why you ought to consider adding rough greens to your dog's diet. Yep, it's so dog food and your dog gets to keep eating the same food, which, of course, is a very, very handy because if you have ever switched dog foods, it's a bit of a mess. So you get to do the same. But dog food is shelf stable. It's got to be able to stay on the shelf for a long time. It's lifeless. Rough Greens is packed with live vitamins, minerals, probiotics, digestive enzymes, omega pills, all that sort of stuff. And you can try it for nothing. Just the shipping. Rough Greens is offering a free jumpstart trial bag. You just cover the shipping, use the discount code Armstrong. To claim your free jumpstart trial bag at roughgreens.com spelled R-U-F-F. The idea is it reduces oxidative stress, supports immune defense, and slows age-related decline, helping your dog stay active, mobile and alert as the pup ages. Once again, R-U-F-F, greens.com, roughgreens.com, use that promo code Armstrong. So don't change your dog's food. Just add Rough Greens and watch the health benefits. Come alive, roughgreens.com, use the code Armstrong. Wolf. So GovGav practically broke down in tears telling the story. It's clip 30, Michael. The other day on stage, one of his many appearances. Go ahead and run that. I met with this kid in Ventura County, whose two parents quite literally disappeared. He didn't even know how to get back into his home. He's a young child. No brothers and sisters. He didn't even know how to feed himself. His mom and dad going to the same meat packing place that had been going in a vegetable packing for 25 years. They smashed the windows. They disappeared. You, you have an experience like that. I'm done. Well, according to the Ventura County Sheriff's Department or the DA's office or the Southern California FBI office, nobody has any report or record of any of this happening. No eyewitness accounts, no video, no written accounts. Nobody can figure out what he's talking about. Oh, really? Because it's quite the story. That's a great story. And well, let's not let the facts get in the way of a good story. When he got to the smashed the windows part, that's where it seemed incredible to me. Yes. Or just smashing out windows to get in there and then snatch kids away. We've got more of his woke wife ready if you'd like to hear more. Sure. Yeah, go ahead with 33. Boys are moving away from sort of the more progressive boys that spend time online, are moving a little bit, I'm trying not to be political here, but are moving to the right. And being sort of influenced by the andretates and some of that sort of alt-right socialization online that we know is very, very dangerous. My husband and I were alarmed when our kids were watching sports online and my son knew about andretate and thought he was pretty cool and thought that his Republican grandfather, who's not a Trumper, but a fiscal conservative, thought that my father would like andretate. So that's scary. We were like one of the most progressive households and our son is confused and asking all these questions. OK. It's interesting, her calling himself a very progressive household and ain't going to work for getting the for winning the presidency. I don't think. But anyway, I don't think he's going to run. So this will all be water under the bridge at some point. Michael hit me with 34. I'm just curious about it. We're working on legislation to hold tech companies accountable and be help them be a force for good in our kids and families lives to to to really provide all the best in class resources and support for youth so that they don't go down this rabbit hole of very, very dangerous and limiting narratives around ultimately what it means to be a girl and what it means to be a boy. We owe it to them and ourselves to kind of heal this. This this gift of modern technology, but curb it to be a force for good. Yeah, they're going to hold tech accountable just like they did during covid. Yeah. And let me guess the best way for to be a boy is to be more like a girl. Correct. Would be me, my guess. 100 percent. Parents, kids got bit by wolves at the zoo and they're being charged with a crime. It's kind of an interesting story and worth the discussion. We'll get to that coming up next, among other things. I mentioned earlier, I just I love seeing parents doing the deal. Um, I don't know why I just gladdens my heart. Uh, to see that sort of thing. I saw a woman leave in the gym with a pushing one kid in a stroller and another kid by the hand and trying to carry all the stuff and do all that sort of stuff. And I just, I don't know, I find that fantastic. Uh, this is a different sort of story from a zoo. This is the way it was portrayed on, portrayed on CBS News last night. A family outing at Hershey Park Zoo America in Pennsylvania on Saturday turned into a frightening scene after a 17 month toddler wandered away from his parents and stuck his hand under the fence of a wolf enclosure. Zoo officials say one of three wolves in the enclosure grabbed the child's hand with its mouth. Quick thinking bystanders pulled the child to safety. He suffered minor injuries. Investigators alleged that the child's parents were distracted by their cell phones and sat on a nearby bench about 30 feet away from the wolf enclosure. The parents are now each facing one count of endangering the welfare of a child. The misdemeanor, they're looking at the potential for up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. So I would need to know all those specifics. The jail time won't happen, but yeah, fine. Um, they suck. You're bad parents. Sorry, I've come to a swift and certain judgment. You don't think, well, I'd have to see the situation. I'd have to see the zoo situation. Cause it's possible. Now, well, there's two things as possible. They could be the kind of parents you're always complaining about this who are pushing their kids in a stroller and staring at their phone and the kid doesn't even get the facial recognition feedback it needs and all that sort of stuff. Correct. And in the Supreme court of Joe Getty, there is a presumption of guilt, which is horrible. Yes, Katie. That report also included the fact that there are two levels of barricades for all of the enclosures at the zoo. So the kid had to climb under a little fence in order to get his hand into the wolf area. Yeah, these parents suck. Find the hell out. I was going to say, there's a possibility that you're also, you've been, you've been at the zoo for hours. You've been paying attention to your kid the whole hours and you sit down in an area where you think it's perfectly safe for your 17 months. What is that a year and a half? That's pretty little. I wouldn't let a kid that will get very far from me at all. But anyway, say it was a three year old, you sit down, you think, God, I got to take a break. I'm going to check some of my work emails. Well, the kid, I don't know, looks at the rock wall or something like that. I can imagine that. The outcome is the proof. Aaron Joe Getty, Supreme Court of Parental Judgment. That the kid got bit by wolves. Nearly torn limb from limb by wolves. How do you take your eyes off of a child that small in a place? That's a pretty little climb into the double, you know, forbidden disclosure, enclosure, rather, not disclosure. Here's a disclosure. Those parents are terrible. I also liked Tom Hansen's report on CBS News. Quick thinking bystanders. Pull the child to safety. Hey, hey, you know what we could do? We could pull the child to safety. I have. There's a wild beast got hold of an animal. Anybody got any ideas? I am a safety. I'm a slow thinking gentleman who's had no paramedic training. And I think my first thought would be grab the kid and pull away from the walls. Apparently, Mr. Hansen had graduated from the David Muir School of Talking Headism said, and the child suffered minor injuries. It is the child's arm is gone and can be your attached. Dearly attached voice. As soon as I had the kid, I would be thinking, who's kid is this over here by himself sticking its hands under the fence with the. Not even 18 months old. So that's in both mom and dad looking at their phones, please. That's a really little kid. I think when I first heard the story, I was picturing more like a four year old. Hmm. Uh, I'm surprised prone to climb in wolf cages. Then you got it. That just your behavior. You got one of those kids, the kind of kid that likes to climb into the wolf cage. Right. Right. Where was that? And we have a story like that a couple of years ago. Was that the kid got in there with the baboons or the tigers or the something sat down there for quite a while. Remember that video? Oh, well, of course, there was the infamous story of, uh, what was the gorilla's name? Rwanda Mamumba, uh, who got shot then. And there were various progressives March. Harambe. Right. That was unfortunate. That became quite a story. Right. Yeah. Yeah. Kid fill in with the gorillas and, uh, yeah, that was no, there were no winners that day, Jack. Mm hmm. Very sad. So Trump has threatened to wipe out a civilization. In fact, he stated he's going to. Well, now, even by Trump standards of hyperbole, that's a heck of a thing to say. Well, talk about that more an hour for, and the whole AI music thing is getting more and more amazing and troubling and illegal. Where the hell does this go from here? We don't know. We'll try to figure it out next hour. If you don't get next hour, grab a podcast Armstrong and get him on demand. Armstrong and Getty.