Luke Russert and Josh Turek: There Is a Vast Rightwing Conspiracy

Oh dear my small business owning friend, you never grow good business with bad website. I know but it's really hard. Do not do the despairing, try Ionos. Let clever thinking AI build your smart looking professional website that is optimized for mobile in no time. And use its many tools to get your business growing growing. Super quick. Nice. No my darlings, this is nice nice nice. Try Ionos. Your digital partner at Ionos.co.uk. You want a graduate job after uni so you need a degree that works for you. At Birmingham City University your career comes first. You'll learn from industry experts and gain the practical skills employers are looking for right now. It's why our graduates get hired. Labour market data shows almost a quarter of new graduate professionals in Birmingham studied at BCE. Ready to get started? Meet your future tutors and explore our industry standard facilities at our open days on the 26th and 27th of June. Search BCE Open Day to book now. Hello and welcome to the Bullard podcast. I'm your host Tim Miller. We got a banger double header show for you today. Lots happened in the news in segment two. We have Josh Turrick who won the Iowa Democratic Senate primary last night. He'll take on Ashley Hinson in the general much to talk about there. That could be a key race for control of the Senate. But first I'll be the newest co-anchor on MSNOWS the week night starting on Monday, June 15th at 7 p.m. You might remember me took a leave of absence from the media in 2016 and went on a three year six continent travel expedition. That led to his book Look For Me There, Grieving My Father, Finding Myself. We chatted about that a while back now. It's Luke Russer. What's up, man? And it also led me to seeing you in the USF Gonzaga basketball game in San Francisco, which was a fantastic evening where we saw Chet Holmgren at the height of his college euphoria. And I'd say he's looked better since then. He's put on some muscles. It shows you that if you have a good base, you can build up to great things. That is true. That was... I'll be at his last game was not very good. That was a deal. I was going to say. He already has the ring. He already has the ring though. That's all that matters. That was a delightful little bit of land yelp on your journey. I was going to say the opposite of what you said about Chet. I think that we saw the weaknesses that were exposed in the Western Conference finals. I believe we said that he has to go to the weight room and he has to eat with me for about a year. That's true. To get where he needs to be. But he's getting there. But he's going to get the ring. He's going to get the max contract. You know, he's all good. He's having a great career. I've got a little bit more on basketball and you traveling the world like Khan at the end of the podcast here. But there's a lot happening in the news. As mentioned, we had the primary night last night. But I think first, we should start with what's happening in the Middle East. So an Iranian missile hit the Kuwait airport last night. There are also Iranian attacks in Bahrain and on an oil tanker near Dubai. These were in response to a US attack on an island near the Strait of Hormuz. A lot of bombing, a lot of drones for a war that is over according to the Secretary of State in his testimony yesterday. Most notably, I think that Kuwait attack left one dead, many injured. Airport record looks horrible. And on the board, it's like this morning, General Hurtling flagged for me that this is the airport the most US servicemen come in and out of. He's been through there a bunch. So it's kind of a relevant location for what our troops are doing in the Middle East. So it seems like the war is still on to me and kind of in the war on, war off, you know, kind of Wayne's World out thing we got going on. Yeah. I mean, I'll take a step back further. I think the reason why we went to war is still not clear. What they've landed on is that the United States had to stop Iran's nuclear capabilities. That's something that's been ongoing for decades. That was something that President Obama and his team worked through that deal, which seemingly was having success prior to it being ripped up. So you're left to wonder why we're actually in this war. And I think that the prevailing theory is that the president got duped by his luxury real estate partners into going to war with Iran. I got a call from, you know, Jay Kush and MBS and was like, Hey, let's just do this. It's going to reform the region. Everything's going to be hunk of door and easy breezy. And it's not. And I think there's a few things still in line here. Number one, it's incredibly dangerous for the region. So the airport you mentioned where US service members are going in and out of our US service members are in harm's way. I don't think we've gotten the straight story about how many times they've been attacked during this war. 13 folks have lost their lives for it. Number two, this entire region that was all supposed to be reformed, we're having comedy festivals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Dubai is the place to be, you know, Bahrain's got the F1. It's now become dangerous again to the point of where all these economic reforms and then opening up to the world doesn't look too good for luxury real estate. And the last thing I'll just sort of say is, is it looks like the straight's going to be closed for the duration of the summer and Labor Day is looking like the earliest time it could be open. I was seeing in this, what does that mean? High gas prices all summer for what? Why did this happen? Yeah, for what is right. And I do think that, you know, we've talked about this a bunch, but he thought this was going to be a quick and dirty job. But you know, it's still, you know, there incompetence doesn't surprise me. Just thinking about Rubio yesterday, I just want to sit on this for a second. He's testifying on the hill. And you know, he's the one that people talk about as the competent one in the administration. He's got a lot of jobs. For some reason, like during this period where we've gotten into this idiotic war with no rationale as you laid out, like Rubio has been like gaining conventional wisdom, momentum and Vance has not, which is like confusing to me because it seems like internally Rubio is the one that wanted this and Vance didn't. You know, in addition to, as you mentioned, his luxury real estate buddies wanting it and Israel, which we get to, but he's there testifying issues. Like we could have a deal today, Wednesday, maybe next week. It doesn't seem like we're anywhere in the ballpark of a deal. Just thinking about this impure, Trumpian, lizard brain, schoolyard bully terms, like the person who's more powerful has, you know, the leverage. Right now it feels like the Iranians are the ones that are executing leverage against us. Yeah. I would agree with that. And I think that Iran has undoubtedly taken the United States as best punch. And yeah, did it knock them off their feet a little bit? Yeah. They lost some very significant people in the opening weeks of that war and that military escalation. But what have they done? They've gone back, they've hunkered down, they've bunkered down, they've moved into a de facto guerrilla warfare, essentially using cheap drones to outman a lot of the defense systems in the Gulf States, seemingly knocking at our bases or our allies at will and showing no sense of stopping. And then when we, the president said, oh, we're going to, you know, eliminate an entire civilization and people are like, okay, that's, you know, that's extreme. But I think they sort of took that threat and said, okay, you want to, you want to do that? Well, we're going to show you how difficult that's going to be over the long term. And we're not going to make a deal until we feel like we're getting out of it, something to stand on, something that strengthens the regime's power going forward. The other thing here, this has completely ruined any of the moderate voices in Iran. I mean, they've been now sidetracked for a generation, in my opinion, because people look at this and say, well, you know, clearly when we put our moderate foot forward in the negotiating for a nuclear deal, it didn't do anything. Luckily, God us all bombed. The hardliners in Iran will take that. But then secondly, reading the guys who are on bulwark and people who follow this for years, the conventional wisdom now is that Iran is stronger today than they were when the war started, that they've shown the ability to take the punch. So why would they commit to a peace deal they don't think is advantageous for that? So I will see that. And then quickly, I just want to put my two cents on the rubio things. And that's important. Yeah. And then we'll actually get through the midterms. The most interesting stories will obviously be who the Democrats are going to try to nominate. But this celebrity apprentice in the Trump White House, between rubio, between JD Vance, right, is someone else coming in? We've been seeing reports, maybe DeSantis gets a cabinet position to some degree. Is he going to be in there and auditioning? This push and pull to try and harness the energy of the MAGA base while also looking just normal enough that the suburban Republicans, that the people who are on the fence aren't going to be repulsed completely. It's going to be a very interesting thing to see play out. And then of course, you got 10 crews with the evangelicals and whatever they go in. But yeah, it's an interesting thing. Trump in the post, just a New York post, a couple of things, says number one, says interesting, we seem to be getting along quite well with the Ayatollah. Yeah. That's one thing he said to the New York Post. I don't. Is that true? It doesn't seem like it's true. He basically confirms that he was the source of the Axios report about his call with BB, where they were yelling at each other. He says that it's true. Unclear who else that source would be. Barker vet is bragged about how Trump is the source of his. Mark Levin had said whoever leaked that call was committing a crime. So I don't know, maybe another crime to look into on Trump. And as you mentioned, he said the blockade could still be in place by Labor Day. There's no fierce urgency of now at all with him. He posted the meme yesterday where it was just like, I don't know, in front of me, it's just like everything will turn out okay. And that's kind of where he's at. Yeah. I mean, it's just, you know, I alone can fix it, trust me, but it's not working here. I would bring up, you know, saying to BB, you're effing crazy. Yeah, he said that. It doesn't seem to have brought BB back a little bit at all. I mean, there's still, it was like, oh, we're going to go after Southern Lebanon. Now we're not. If BB feels like he can do whatever he wants without any type of repercussion, that's going to prolong any conflict in the region for a while. I think that when you look at this, they expected that as well at 2.0. Yeah. And now they have no idea what they're doing. And all the people who know how to operate in this part of the world do not work for this administration. There are no serious players in this administration that really know how to get these things done, that no real politic, et cetera. So you're left with him just feeling the void, going to friendly news outlets, be like, trust me, everything's going to be okay. But even that's not working that much. Can I just play for you? It's not. This struck me. This struck me. Meg and Kelly had Sean Ryan on. Are you a Sean Ryan kind of? So Sean, I saw he's turning. He's turning. So Sean is a tough, for people who don't know him, he's like a, he's like a guns and military podcaster. Guns and guts guy, I would say. Yeah. That it was really a mainstream guns, you know, kind of, um, podcaster that then veered more into Magg-world. Him and Meg and Kelly are talking. Let's listen to how they assess the state of play. I don't know. I don't, I don't know what to think anymore. I don't even, I just, I don't even trust my own intuition when it comes to politics because I thought things were going to be so different. And I got fucking duped. Nobody knows anything about anything. I knew something. It's, it's one of the themes of the year. And the thing is like the Trump thing is so disappointing because he did seem like he was going to be different. You know, he, he was independently wealthy. So there was some reason to believe he wasn't going to need their money or be swayed by it. He's such a fighter and a middle finger. He's a walking middle finger. The cope is so strong. They go on to talk about how Miriam Adelson. What is this? Like what? We thought he'd be different. Tim, I mean, look at the USFL documentary about Donald Trump. You don't have to know anything about politics. He tanked a football league that was on the upswing. He's tanked casinos. The only thing that Donald Trump brings to the table effectively in American politics is that he is a WWE Hall of Famer. He knows how to speak to the masses, get them riled up using WWE tactics. And the thing about WWE, the storylines change. People have short memories. They're quick. But my God, I mean, the amount of people go, I can't believe, I can't believe that I've been duped. Or are you dead? Or are you dead? It's really funny. Yeah, they go on to talk about how, you know, they should have known when Miriam Adelson was putting all the money in there. It's like grasping around. It's like, maybe it was the juice that duped us. It's like, we don't know. It's like everything was right in front of our face. We don't have any of the conspiratorial nature of it is mind boggling. And it's like now he's become, you know, bought up on this deep state. And that's the thing. He's always been kind of this blank canvas, which every conspiracy could be thrown upon and he could serve as the vehicle. And now people are realizing it's like, no, he's just trying to enrich himself. I mean, this is about $600 million. No big contracts for his kids. I mean, this is this is not some sort of great dear leader serving as the vehicle for all your conspiratorial ideas. This is a pretty common thing to say. This is graph. Well, and we all saw it. Everybody else saw it. The brain is interesting. You know, you've got to rationalize. You got to convince yourself that you weren't the idiot that you aren't full. It's pretty delightful. We'll continue to watch it. Are you not pretty busy around here? Shutting the daughter off to a bunch of different camps. Yeah, you don't, you don't believe all the different camps that she's got. I'm doing all these content activations, we're doing some summer fixups around the house. You don't always have time to do the shopping that you want to do to improve things in your home. That's one thing I love about our friends at three day blinds. You can shop for the blinds without leaving your house and they make it as easy as possible. Three day blinds is a leading manufacturer of high quality custom window treatments in the U S right now. If you use my URL, three day blinds.com slash the bull work. They're running a buy one, get 150% off deal. We can shop for almost anything at home. Why not shop for blinds at home too? Three day blinds has local professionally trained design consultants who have 10 plus years of experience on average. They provide the right guidance on the right blinds for you in the comfort of your home. You can set up an appointment and you get a free, no obligation quote the same day. The best part for me, we've got our three day blinds is that there's no DIY. I don't do DIY. I'm not Tim the toolman, Taylor. Okay. The expert team handled all the heavy lifting. Right now get quality window treatments that fit your budget with three day blinds. Head to threedayblinds.com slash the bull work for their buy one, get 150% off deal on custom blinds, shades, shutters and drapery for a free, no charge, no obligation consultation. Just head to threedayblinds.com slash the bull work one last time. That's buy one, get 150% off when you head to the number three, DIY blinds.com slash the bull work. I want to talk to you about some media stuff too. I'm looking through the election. So obviously the huge 60 minutes news overnight is that Scott Pelle was fired by Barry Weiss and Nick built in this, this new guy they brought into run 60 minutes. We've covered this other place on the bull work, but for people who haven't, cause I haven't on this podcast, I started where on the introductory meeting of this new head of 60 minutes, Scott Pelle just went in on him very aggressively talked about how Weiss is murdering 60 minutes, talking about how he doesn't know anything, that he has no experience. You guys have no qualifications. And then after that, they all have a long meeting, decided what to do. They fired Pelle by email last night. Pelle then put out a very long statement. They've had a lot of positive 60 minute stuff and, you know, just kind of general, you know, the thing that you say when you're, you're leaving a company, but included this paragraph on a read you is pretty interesting. For my part, new management has instructed me to inject falsehoods and bias into politically sensitive stories. I've been told to include assertions that are unverified to date. In every case, I managed to ignore these instructions or refuse them. Recently politicians have been invited to choose the correspondence for interviews on the broadcast, giving politicians control over 60 minutes. Interviews is not how this is done. Finally, incompetence and unprofessionalism and the new management have wrecked Havoc. In a case involving one of my stories, the entire program came within 19 minutes of not getting on air at all. Well, yeah, let's unpack that because I think there is a very serious undertone there. What Pelle is essentially saying is that the First Amendment is under assault at CBS News, which, if you know the history of CBS News, it has been a gold standard, especially in that level of broadcast journalism that has always been seen as the apotheosis of what it should be. And you think about 60 minutes as a program, the NFL lead in nine, 10 million people watching the most important stories of the week that are wonderfully produced. And what Pelle is essentially saying is that he's been under pressure from his bosses who were installed by Trump allies, the Ellison family, to put in false information in the vaunted CBS News 60 minutes. That is terrifying. That is absolutely terrifying. Now, I worked for a network that some folks would say has certain opinions. Never once has a boss come to me and said, I want you to put this into a story. I need you to have this opinion for me. Not once, not once. So when you see that type of control coming from the top, it's very scary. And it shows how much this administration takes umbrage with truthful reporting. The other thing I want to say about Scott Pelle, though, keeping it real. Scott Pelle almost 40 years at CBS to go out the way that he did. He'll never pay for a drink in my presence ever. I mean, that is the most bad ass of bad ass. And guy like Scott telling me this is a guy who's done some of the most just real truthful, bad ass reporting we've seen over the course of a career. And he is not some lefty whistleblower. Like I want to go out and get a book deal and talk about. No, no, no. He's basically saying, listen, I've done this for a very long time. This is heinous. And I'm going to I'm not going to be a part of this anymore. And people really should listen because this is not normal. This is a five alarm fire. And frankly, I'm very scared for the future of media with anything that they touch because if they the more control they mass, especially with their entertainment networks, there's a little subliminal messages out there. It's scary. Yeah. I mean, Tim, you used to you used to pedal on this the days of the vast left wing media conspiracy over there. Well, and there was it. It wasn't not not. It wasn't not totally wrong. I mean, you know, that was some bias out there. But the pendulum has shifted. And there is literally a vast right wing conspiracy trying to take over the media right now. You know, my old Republican instincts do come in sometimes in this thing. I believe in creative destruction. I think something else good will emerge. There are other opportunities. There's platforms like this one and others where people can have their voices heard. But it is concerning. I can I'm worried more about the social media platforms than that. Then the media institutions, it's sad. It's like depressing for that 60 minutes is being just totally gutted. And I like what is left? I mean, they there's I mean, that's the thing. It's like we we live so much on the hamster wheel and you have to go back a little bit. You're like, man, if you had told me within six months, the Washington Post and 60 minutes were both going to be killed. I know. I would be. I would I would have taken the bet. No, sure. No way. I agree with that. There's no way. There's no way they could do that. And they're doing it. And you're starting to look at like, all right, what are the bulwarks? You know, you got to go to the places that are the bulwarks that are protecting the real news and real thought and we'll go as long as we possibly can. I'll tell you that. It's a good point. And if you take the lens back and it's the kind of thing that, you know, people would have said, you have TDS, you're an alarmist. If a year and a half ago, you're like, the Washington Post in 60 minutes will essentially be, you know, totally decimated, you know, by pressure from the regime. And it's happened. And if you look at the CBS correspondent, we'll see what Bill Whitaker does. They have to get a whole new cast. I mean, everybody's gone, basically. Yeah. I mean, I don't see how people stay there. And then who gets hired? The type of person that goes in is going in for a corrupt deal. Like even if the person themselves, even if they managed to to snow somebody and bring somebody into CBS, who's a good person and a good reporter, but they're joining a corrupt system. Nothing will change there until they get new leadership. And if they even bring in new leadership, it'll be someone who would be, I think would be under pressure just to sort of put out a very milk toast middle of the road product. It doesn't ruffle any feathers. The other thing that's just worth mentioning, this is meaningfully different because other things have been taken off the air. Cold air at CBS. It's meaning definitely different from cold bear in a sense. Cold bear was a money suck. And you could at least, you know, again, it's hard not to look at it without the context of the corrupt system and the pressure coming from the president of the United States on the media company to get mergers. But you can at least listen to a business reporter that's like, well, this was inevitable. These late night shows aren't making money anymore. That's not the case about 60 minutes. Viewership was up 9% in the most recent season in 60 minutes. 60 minutes made like $200 million last year in ad revenue for the company. And like they're going to get for their ideological mission. And I would also argue, and you know, we're a little bit older here, but. It's big for yourself. Yes. Thank you very much. But like there is a part of these broadcast networks, those big three where there are civic institutions and the media division, the news division has always been considered a sort of altruistic deal. Right. It's like you may lose some money here. Most of them make money, but the idea is like you got your sports. You got your entertainment. But the news, it's just a half hour night and a few hours in the morning. And then the news shows like 60 minutes for CBS, your date line for NBC. Those are the important parts of the public trust that these networks are giving you unfiltered, unbiased news that helps you in your day to day life as a citizen of the United States, making informed decisions. And if that is just becoming just done away with totally, it's very troubling. It's very troubling. So I agree with you. Cold Bear, I can see the business rationale to it, although I think he's an incredible talent and I miss him already. But the news stuff, no, there's an altruistic component to it. And if we private equity that it's over. This episode is sponsored by Better Help. Summer's finally here and, you know, summer can be great. Time for pool parties, vacation. I'm going to take a vacation this year, but I got some guesthouse ready for you guys. Chill out. Kids are out of school. It can also get a little overwhelming to juggle at all. Our family calendar is crazy. And for being honest, I think we all have moments when we're counting down the minutes till the kids are back in school. During all this, sometimes it's important to build time in for yourself. One way to do that is with therapy. Therapy can help people better understand their needs, feel more confident, setting boundaries and create a version of summer that actually feels good. And now finding a therapist is easier than ever. Thanks to our friends at Better Help with over 30,000 therapists. Better Help is the world's largest online therapy platform, having served over 6 million people globally. Better Help does the initial matching work for you so you can focus on your therapy goals. The short questionnaire helps identify your needs and preferences. And our 12 plus years of experience and industry leading match fulfillment rate means that Better Help typically gets it right the first time. If you aren't happy with your match, though, you can switch to a different therapist at any time from the tail address. You don't have to say yes to everything this summer. Find support in therapy. Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp.com slash the bulwark. That's better H-E-L-P dot com slash the bulwark. Let's go to the primary results last night. There's some interesting ones, California, Iowa, Montana, elsewhere. I have one race in particular that really caught my eye, but I'm wondering if there's anything that you saw last night that you wanted to vamp about. Well, I thought in Iowa, I was I was very interested in what was happening there. I think your guess you're having on Josh Turrick later today. I thought his speech was masterful last night. I think he spoke to making it a local race, but also talking about larger scale issues. Why don't we put in a little bit from that? I've had to fight my whole life. And this is what is needed in D.C. People who have gone through real struggle, who know what it's like to not have enough, who know what a gallon of gas cost, who have had to put groceries on a credit card. We have enough millionaires in D.C. looking out for billionaires. We need real people in Washington who have felt the consequences of a broken system because when you have gone through real struggle, you will have a different level of empathy and a different level of fight. And this is what we need in D.C. Fighters for the people. And that is what I will be in the United States Senate. Just sort of talking about how the rates of cancer in Iowa have gone up exponentially, how we got in the race because he saw all these people getting denied medical claims, his own inspiring story being in a wheelchair. And it got me sort of thinking about, you know, the democratic collapse in the state of Iowa is kind of a really good microcosm of the problems they've had nationwide. Because it's a state that one time had Tom Harkin, it had Vilsack and had Chek Kolver. There are statewide elected democratic officials. I worked on, I covered that campaign of when Joni Ernst, Pete, Bruce, Braley, put the hog, the castrated hog commercial. But if you had told me, you know, that the Republicans were in three straight in Iowa with pretty comfortable margins, I would be very surprised. But I think this, I think Turks is a good candidate. I think Rob Sands is a good candidate in the governor's race. Let's talk about the governor's race, because that's the one that I wanted to get to. And did you pay attention to the Republican primary at all? Because this one I've been, I was nerding out last night because I was intrigued. The dear leader selection did not go as planned. It was a Trump endorsement goes down. The backstory here is this one is for those of us real ones like me and Luke who were paying attention to politics before Trump came in. Steve King was a Trump. The original MAGA racist. Yeah. A Stephen Miller, a Stephen Miller before Stephen Miller in Congress. And it was always according controversy. But he ends up finally getting out over his skis in 20, I think it was 2019, drawing a primary from a guy named Randy Feenstra. For people who don't remember this, I found an old CNN clip and I just want to play a couple of bites from that. This is what happened to Steve King in 2019. The big subject just before us all that some might refer to as the elephant in the room is a situation of a New York Times quote. A quote that his own party thought was so racist. They stripped Congressman Steve King of his congressional committee assignments. In it, he says, white nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization. How did that language become offensive? Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization? For everyone who's a valedictorian, there's another hundred out there that they weigh 130 pounds and they've got calves the sides of cantaloupes because they're all on 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert. Chuck, the Mexican side, the white nationalism. How did that get back? So let's fast forward to last night. Steve King ends up shows you how quickly things change. Steve King actually got beaten in a Republican primary because he said something too racist, something I don't think you could say today. He gets beaten by a guy named Randy Feenstra. He was a down the line Christian conservative kind of guy. And he was one of these guys that, you know, as the never Trumpers, we get, you always get the right wing folks try to, you know, guilt trip us into being on behalf of like the less bad Republican. And I got that a lot about Feenstra. Like, oh, you got to be for him. And I'm like, I don't have this Feenstra guy seems like a total Trump stooge. And like, I don't think he's not going to be anything great to me. But Feenstra wins the primary. Does everything Mr. Trump wants gets Mr. Trump's endorsement. Fast forward to last night. There's an upstart candidate named Zach Lane, who didn't even register to vote in Iowa until 2023. He was a former Koch brothers activist who married into the family, so to speak. Got some generational wealth for himself. Use some of that money to invest in a company that manufactures cock rings, which we appreciate your support. Never know. Nothing wrong with that. But interesting in Iowa to be a cock ring manufacturer from Kansas. But he went full maga. He beats Feenstra on the back of an endorsement from Steve King. Revenge is a revenge is a pickle. Mistress. So I'm going to revenge the dish served cold. Steve King, the racists are on the rise again in the Republican primary. And now Zach Lane will face off against Rob sand at the governor's race. What a journey that was. Hello. I covered Steve King in the House of Representatives for many years. And he was someone who was considered so extreme that the leadership would always get mad at us for quoting him, saying, you're taking this one bad apple out of this beautiful House Republican conference. Why do you pay attention to this guy? Well, guess what? Steve King now could be the mouthpiece of this administration that's in Washington, D.C. I look like to the presidency. Now, I mean, I think it's full circle for Steve King. I think that sometimes you always say that the party goes where the energy is. And there's a reason why this guy was, you know, packing auditoriums for as much as he was disliked. And now you've seen that play out in this primary. I'll say this, though, in Iowa, how deep does the cult go? Yeah. Because if you're a farmer right now, your costs are through the roof. Tariffs are hurting you. Fertilizer costs are up because of what's happening in Iran. The fuel prices over the summer are going to be terrible for you. It shows you Rob Sand and Lon, you're starting to see the differences between the parties and what the choices are here. Because San is a very common sense Democrat for Iowa. Without them. Yeah, middle of the road Democrat auditor running on, you know, making sure everybody, no matter what party they are, if they do corruption, go to jail. Every cent. I think it's the bellwether. Your dad in Florida, Florida, Florida. I think that November is Iowa, Iowa, Iowa. Iowa's back. The Democrats are kicking it out of the presidential first four. But I think it's back this year. Trump wins it by 12 or 13 last year. So it's a stretch that if the Democrats want to take the Senate, Turk, Turk probably has to be part of the group. Maybe not. I think there are other paths you could do Peltola, Telerico, but that's right on the edge. And what do you think of Ashley Henson? I mean, she seems to be pretty. She's pretty talented. I mean, she's a, I would call her a, I mean, she's just a down the line, Magga. Yeah, she's down the line. She seems pretty average. But she's personally affable. Right. I've seen her in person. I went to one of her events in Iowa. It's not like she's a wet paper bag and she's a compelling politician. She's been the state. It's going to be a tough race for Turk. I guess the point is if you're going to win Iowa back again as a Democrat, this is the year given everything that's happening economically and all the crazy stuff in the White House and these two strong nominees against at least one extremely weak nominee and then Henson on the Republican side. That it will be the state I'm monitoring the closest, I think, when we get to November. I just want to talk really good about two other races up Montana. I only want to mention this just because it's nice when the Democrats are in a ray, you know, and when good things happen and every once in a while, you need to mention that because I'm going to get to California next. What are that? What are that? It's not the case in Montana. There was a handsome fireman named Sam Forstock. Maybe this is all the Democrats need is just handsome firemen that look good. Shirtless. He was supported both by the kind of center. I'd live Smith on the pod Friday, like that kind of group. The majority Democrats, the center left kind of fighting mods and by the fight agency, AOC, Grand Partner Morse cats, I've had on the podcast, like that, that group, both wings that are fighting all the time on Twitter, supported the handsome fireman and this primary. He ends up winning the primary and, um, you know, we'll see if Montana district is in play for the first time in a minute. If you're just looking for something that's easy on the eyes and something that makes you happy that the Democrats are pulling their shit together, it might, you might want to look at Sam Forstock. Case is not the same in California. It looks like Javier Becerra and Karen Bass will get through to the runoff. So I guess the California Democrats are just like, let's just go full steam ahead. Nothing wrong in California. We're just going to take the two establishment, uh, special interest figures, put them through in theory, you could have seen two Democrats get in because of the way the California systems worked. We don't know yet. It takes California about a month to count. We'll probably know by about the major like all star game, um, who the other person is in these runoffs, but it seems like it's probably going to be, um, Spencer Pratt and the mayor's race in LA and, um, and Steve Hilton, the British, the little British fella and the governor's race. I don't know, man. I don't know what's happening out there. So we spent a lot of time in California. My mom's a seventh generation in California and my wife's from California in the central valley. So I know California very well. I love California. Here's how I read into this. Okay. You, you have constituency groups in California that mobilize their voters and get them over the unions are very strong. You had other types of groups that push people and call the build coalitions, et cetera. I think the bigger story here is bass is very unpopular, but Sarah has never really been loved by anybody in his own party and it's kind of now been sold upon it's just like the guy, right? We needed a guy after Swahwell imploded. We don't trust Steyer cause he's a billionaire. Uh, Porter never was able to get past the staffer issue. I was surprised at the mayor of San Jose, Matt Mahon didn't do better. I think there's, he had a lot of tech money, which I think is a problem now in the democratic primary for good reason, for good reason. In his case, I don't think that it, like there was anything to be, this campaign was uninspiring, but you know, his, the, what he, in terms of results, that was someone who I think actually would have been very interesting to see what they would have done as governor. But here's how I look at California. This all now traces to Gavin because I, I find Gavin to be the front runner right now on the democratic side until someone knocks him out. Who knows what I'll take the field. We don't know what we don't know what O's going to do. But as a right now, let's do a little, let's do a little bit. We'll do a dinner in New Orleans. I want betting on it. I'm getting you Gavin and come on. I'm taking the field. I'm saying, I'm saying today. Okay. Okay. As of today, okay. We're here in the year of our Lord 2026. I'd put Gavin as the front runner on a democratic side. Lock can happen. But once he's, he moves out of office and California has Basara as governor, Bassadel, there's a lot of the stories are to come out of California that are going to be difficult for him. And what is his legacy? And I think that'll be the very interesting thing to look with them in terms of, of, of national politics. As far as the state goes, state just keeps on churning in fourth largest economy in the world, diversified economy, just to go Valley money, Ag money. I mean, there's always problems in California, but then it always keeps coming back. You know, it's like the logo of San Francisco, the Phoenix rising from the ashes. The model. Yeah. It always comes back. The model. Okay. One of the California recent come, I just want to flag briefly just for other. Social media obsessives like myself. Sometimes you can get a little bit too into the social media discourse on a race. For anybody who followed this San Francisco congressional race, I online, it was very challenging to find a Scott Wiener supporter. He's a local pretty accomplished state legislator, Yimbi guy. He got a little bit cross ways on the Israel issue. It was kind of flip flopping on that. And he's running against this, this very online guy that was AOC's chief of staff, ton of energy on a few, if you're following the race on X.com, you'd think former AOC chief of staff had a lot of momentum. He lost by 30. The Scott Wiener last night, who doesn't even get to the runoff. So it is important to know for those of us who are monitoring these races online that, you know, sometimes things on the ground are a little different than how things are going on the internet. But that race is one I paid a lot of attention to because it's Nancy Pelosi's seat and the seat of San Francisco is a very strong seat. There's a lot of money in that district. And Wiener has been running for that seat for like the last 10 years to factor, they were all waiting for Pelosi to retire. And I think there was a lot of speculation that she was going to try and push her daughter into that seat and whether or not that was going to work. That's not been the case. But she's back in Connie Chan, who is a very, I would say, kind of normal San Francisco politician, someone who is a supervisor. So can Chan beat Wiener? I don't know. Wiener has a very good operation, a very good money machine. He almost got a lot of things just clean. And he was in the 40s. Yeah. So I think he should be OK, although it's well known Pelosi is not a fan of him because she thinks that he has been too eager to ascend into the the seat of the queen of California politics. You do not come into the throne until you are summoned, sir. So we will see. Games can be eager. Oh, dear, my small business owning friend, you never grow good business with bad website. I know, but it's really hard. Do not do the despairing. Try Ayonos. Let clever thinking AI build your smart looking professional website that is optimized for mobile in no time and use its many tools to get your business growing. Super quick. Nice. No, my darlings. This is nice, nice, nice. Try Ayonos, your digital partner at Ayonos.co.uk. Welcome, Rev Heads and Ruffins. Getting wrecked in the Australian outback used to be a one way trip to the scrappy. Right now is the start of a high state's hunt for outback gold for these Aussie legends. In a brand new TV series on Blaze, they're scrapping, fixing and driving some hard bargains that makes these wreckers a tidy summer money. If they can dodge getting built upon a scorching sun. So watch outback records. Tuesdays at 2 and 9 p.m. on Blaze. Magic. All right. One other news item and then I want to get back to your book for a sec. There's Bill Pulte-Dews, which we talked about a little bit yesterday. I think on the merits, it's such an absurd nomination to put this guy in charge of DNI. It's just so obvious that Trump just wants him there to go after his foes. That's what he's been doing about housing agency, going through people's mortgages, making sure they cross their T's and down their eyes. If they ever said anything mean about Donald Trump, he's now going to try to use the power of our intelligence agencies to do that. Senator Democrats, what I wanted to flag though is that Senator Democrats are doing something that a lot of us have been urging them to do for a while now, which is use limited power they have in the minority to hold up things. And the report this morning is they've been telling their GOP colleagues that Trump doesn't withdraw. Pulte is acting director of DNI that they will tank the bipartisan FISA deal because they don't trust this guy to be in charge of FISA. Totally reasonable. And the type of shit that would like to see more of. Kind of we'll see how that shakes out. Do you have any thoughts on that? Yeah. So I think you're touching on something that's very important. That's going to be incredibly, an incredibly big story as we head into the midterms, which it does appear that on the backs of the $1.8 billion slush front that Trump was trying to give to the seditious folks who stormed the Capitol and also the tax freedom for his family, that that has now seemed who have grown a spine in some Senate Republicans. You have Tillis, Cassidy and Corn, the ones who are out the door, who are essentially saying, I want to have an opinion about this Mitch McConnell, I would throw in there, too. And Thune, I think, sees the writing on the wall that some of this has become so egregious and over the top, they have to do what they can to stop the worst of the worst of the worst. I'm not saying they're a profile encouraged by any means. There's a lot of stuff they could have done already to this point. Which would have been great. But they're starting to see, I think, a little bit of movement of, you know what? Do we really want to go this far down the rabbit hole? And this insane type of stuff. And that is what Bill Pulte is. He is someone with no experience in national intelligence. I never thought in a million years that I could say that Tulsi Gabbard being removed from head of DNI actually made us less safe. I would take Tulsi Gabbard over this guy. I would say, yeah. Do you know how crazy it is for me to say that? Because at least Tulsi Gabbard has been on a co-dell. She's at least traveled abroad, has some relationships with some of these intelligence actors, not the gun ones. People would argue she's too close to Russia, but she's at least been in rooms with people who talk about national intelligence. Bill has no experience in that. Bill is a 38 year old, a rich guy who's done some stuff at Fannie and Freddie, who just has the president's ear. And we've gotten to the point now where the dear leader is seemingly just, you know, who in the Legion of Doom do I have who is unfailingly loyal to me? No matter the qualifications. And oh, by the way, if there's some horrific terrorist attack, you know how bad this is? It's terrible. It's terrible. Terrible. Yeah. And he's not even trying to do intelligence. The thing he's trying to do domestic spy real quickly on that. I just want to do a historical point because we can nerd out. OK. In 2011, when Boehner, when you all won 63 seats, Boehner put Michelle Bachman on the entire committee. And that was like a bone to that type of the party. I would love Michelle Bachman to be head of the call. I think Michelle Bachman would be an incredibly successful head of DNI comparative to Bill. Is she still with her husband? Just had to get that in there. I don't know what Michelle's doing now. She's probably not watching the bull work, but if she is, Marcus is Marcus. Oh, no, Marcus is doing these days. Marcus Marcus. You're out there, girl. Oh, I went to Minnesota for that race and she made against a guy in graves and he had a button that said, I dig graves. And that was his campaign file. And then when she dropped out, this guy spent a bunch of money as a Democrat. He dropped out and it's like, aren't you going to run for the seat now? He's not. I don't care. I just was going to his body. I don't want to be a cop. It's a good girl. I thought it was hilarious. You're journey back to TV. I wanted to bring this up because I'm sure there's maybe some like me. I had initial Luke Russard skepticism, you know, like he looks like a lacrosse guy. I don't know. He might have bullied me. I wish I had a year still. I don't have the medicine anymore. And I and so I had that initial feeling. And then, but I also have a soft spot for people who have who go into the wilderness and who have like real life reflection, particularly in DC, because every DC is very much a ladder, crime and culture, you know, and it's just kind of onto the next thing and people fail up. And a lot of times they don't think about their choices very often. And like you spent a long period thinking about your choices, which I appreciated. Now that you're back in the game in two weeks here, June 15th, I'm just wondering, do you have any wisdom for yourself? Is there something you're reflecting upon from your time out in the world? Oh, Tim, I love your book because you hit into this idea of perspective and why we did it. And in 2015, I actually had a conversation with the House Speaker, John Boehner, and he asked me a very haunting question. He said, what are you doing here? And I thought he meant, you know, you're having a meeting together. I said, well, you're the House Speaker. You asked me to a meeting. That's why I'm here. He goes, no, what are you doing here in Washington? It's just it's a place for someone's up, someone's down. There's always the next election. There's always the next bill. It's very cyclical and you can stay here 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 years and have no idea what happened in your life, not seeing how any of the world works or even how the country works. You get so caught up in this bubble. And that was actually a voice that had been in my head. Is this all you are? You grew up in this very cushy bubble in Washington, D.C. You got a famous last name. Is there a world beyond this? And that's why I decided to take some time away because I didn't know who I was. And when I took time away and went to six comments in 75 countries, a lot of that was a grief journey, reclamation sign, the death of my father. But a lot of that was also gaining perspective, not only in my life, but also my country and in my capital. And that's what I'm going to try to bring to MS now every single night is being in the belly of the beast as a beat reporter for about eight years on Capitol Hill, but also seeing how the rest of the world works, the rest of the world operates and frankly, how the rest of the world views the United States. And what is our American identity within that space? So I think it's very important to gain perspective. And what you've always done a good job of, Tim, is that you've always been, I think, good about what cuts through to people, you know, for voters. Because it's so easy in D.C. to like get in these conversations where voters are just sort of like thought of commodity for like cattle. Right. And it's like, no, there's actually real people at the end of that. And yeah, you do have your true believers, like 30 percent of each camp. But then there is a lot of people in that middle space that are looking for guidance or looking for understanding. And it's helpful to remind people in the day to day, like, you know, these are some big issues that we need to look at. And, you know, that the 60 minutes to disintegrate before our eyes should make you concerned if you're paying paycheck to paycheck, trying to put food on the table. That's that's going to be something that's still a concern for you and your children in the country that you want to grow up in. So just sort of keeping it real in that respect. Yeah. Or and people in the middle, the other thing about learning about people and getting out there and learning about yourself. I saw this funny clip yesterday of a guy who's being interviewed man on the street, California, and he was voting for Steyer and Pratt. And like, and his reason was I used to be homeless and Pratt seems to care about the homeless. Like that person does not exist. And like the archetypes that people have in their head, I think it's just important to remember that we're running out of time. I just real quickly on that. The most interesting voter to me was the Kemp-Warnock voter at Georgia. Like that voter exists. Who are they? Right. And that's an important perspective. My last thing, we have the NBA finals begins tonight. And I want to get you taken that you're a basketball guy like me. But first I went to the archives and found maybe some relevant audio that you might remember that I'm interested in your reaction to reflection on. Let's listen. What would happen to the NBA without Michael Jordan? I think the NBA survived. I think the NBA would be just fine. I think it's got a great infrastructure with a lot of young players coming up. I think as we mentioned today, it's a lot of young players who are going through that transition period and it's going to take some time because of the maturity, but the NBA is going to be strong for a period of time. Granted, what would happen to the NBA without Michael Jordan? Well, it would give the rest of us a chance to win. All the politics is one. Your dad, of course, interviewing Michael Jordan. That was a great day. So that was the 1997 All-Star game in Cleveland. And a young Luke Russert has volunteered to carry my dad's briefcase for that assignment. And that was an incredibly special day. And getting to meet those guys and take their photos was incredible. Like, I love the NBA. I absolutely to this day adore Michael Jordan because of the standard of dominance that he put forward. And I think it's something that we all should aspire to as Americans. I honestly say that the Jordan standard of the hard work and just putting it in every single day and giving it your all for the NBA finals. Sidebar, Grant Hale didn't get injured. I think he'd be a top 10 NBA player of all time. Maybe top five. Very, very good player. Finals tonight. The NBA will be OK without Jordan. Yes, it has been OK. And the question will be, is it going to be OK without LeBron? Is going to be OK without Steph Curry coming up? I think so. I will say, though, I'm very concerned about the future of American men's basketball. It seems to be going the way of American men's tennis. The top players now all four and born, they're learning a different style of basketball. What does that mean for the United States going forward? We need to get rid of the AAU. We got to get something in there that is teaching the players who are coming up how to compete at the level that we see with Wemby, we see with Yolkich, we see with SGA. You know, some people count SGA as an American now. That's Canadian ball and it's a different game. OK, so that's my big thing there. But it's for the finals tonight. The Yanks will be all right. I want the Knicks badly. I really want them to win. And I really think that they can create some matches. I wonder if you guys are next. I searched when I found that clip, I was searching Tim Russert, Knicks, because I was like, I knew he was a Bill Spahn. So now we're Wizards. So you have my Wizards whole story game. I can't see it. OK, so we I'm now with through the family, I think I'm on year 29 or almost year 30 of having Washington Wizard season tickets. You want to talk about like the Patriots saying of lost causes? All right, you think the bills have a tortured history? They could be on the cover. Like at least the bills like get in the door. The Wizards are they're lost on the highway walking on the shore. They got the first pick this year. They are coming up. They're coming up. We'll see. I like the GM and the management that they have there. They have good young players. Koshan's good. Sars good. Bob is good. They're going to get a pick and we'll see what happens with Trey Young and and Davis. But all that being said, I think I hope the next I'm going to go. Nixon six. I think the Knicks can create some matchup problems for San Antonio. It bridges his hand is a rabbit. Who's who's got the Robinson's Robinson's? Robinson's hand can be OK. I think O.G. is a tough matchup for San Antonio. Bronson could play lights out. They just got to get one of these first two. You got to get one of these first two. But I would not be surprised if Wendy just goes ham and they win it for that's either. Yeah. All right. Best pose back. Thanks. Wendy and the Knicks. Luke Russert, man. It's good to see you again. It's been always a pleasure. Thanks to you. Thanks for finding that Jordan. That was really cool. Of course, man. Good luck on the new show. Thank you. We're now 7 p.m. The weeknight with Michael Steele, Simone, St. Andrews Townsend and Luke Russert. Boy, that's an all star line up. Five of her one up next is Josh Turrick. clergy clergy clergy clergy All right, we are back. He is a Paralympic gold medalist and state legislator in Des Moines. He is now the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Iowa. It's Josh Turrick. What's up, man? I'm going to talk to you. It's great to talk to you. Thanks for having me. Matt, on the wind last night, how's it feeling? Feels good. I'm not going to lie, I'm a little tired, working on two hours of sleep. But a lot of energy and a lot of excitement happening. And it was an amazing night, a culmination of 10 months out there on the trail and an enormous amount of hard work. But I'm really excited and so are a lot of Iowans. I'm seeing real genuine hope in Iowans' eyes for the first time in a very long time. I've been locked in on the Iowa race. We had a little chat for a while, but I think a lot of maybe some listeners, you're not getting as much attention as the drama queens down in Texas, for example. So a lot of people might not be familiar with you. So why don't you just give us just really quick your first date, tell us about Josh Turrick's story. Sure. State representative from Iowa, born and raised in Council plus Iowa, to a working class family in a working class community, went through a lot of economic adversity early in my life. We went to the Goodwill as a family, shared clothes, had the wrong color lunch tickets. I was born with my disability. I was born with a condition called spina bifida. It's due to my father's exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam. I had my first surgery at one day old. I had 21 surgeries before I was 12. Thankfully for me, found wheelchair basketball and had a very successful wheelchair basketball career, both collegiately and professionally. Ended up playing in four Paralymic games, one back to back gold medals representing the USA and wheelchair basketball. And then got involved in nonprofit work for disabled kids and got involved in healthcare. I was assessing and providing mobility devices like power wheelchairs for individuals with progressive conditions. And we were seeing a thousand percent increase in denial rates for individuals that were on Medicaid here in Iowa. And so decided to run. Won my first election by just six votes. And I did that by dragging my wheelchair upstairs every single day, rain or shine, hot or cold. I represent the reddest district that was won on election day in the most recent election. The two communities I represent, Trump won by 18 points and by 10 points. I was able to win my district by six points. And now running for the U.S. Senate. Because I believe it's a once in a generation opportunity to win Senate Harkin seat back. You just rolled past something there pun intended that I want to talk about for a second, which is that for that state house race. So you live in Council Bluffs. I've done a bunch of races in Iowa. We called it Council Tucky, you know, with love. It gives you a little feel for what's happening down there. You mentioned in that race, when you're doing the door knocking, you're going around town. It's right there in the name, Council Bluffs, Hilly. You're going upstairs. Yes. You're going to the wheelchair up the stairs and then knocking on people's door. People had to be like, what in the fuck is happening? Like who is this person? I want to hear a little bit about that. That is absolutely true. I wasn't very efficient, but it became very effective always. And you're right, Council Bluffs, it's one of the two places on earth with the Los Hills. So every single house has somewhere between 10, 20, 30 stairs. And sometimes it would take me 10 or 15 minutes to drag my wheelchair up the stairs. The very first question I would always be asked is, how long the world did you get up? Depending on how many stairs is there. Bro, I'm already not running for state house. If I got 30 minutes up one stairs, I mean, oh shit, even if it's 10 minutes, that's too much. By the time I would get up there, they would always say, how in the world did you get up here? And I would say, I drug my wheelchair up here. That's how important your vote is. And then I would find regardless of where they sat on the political spectrum, they would be willing to give me a few minutes of their time, even if they were a hardcore Republican, just to say, my God, this guy just dragged his wheelchair all the way up here. And I found that in five or 10 minutes of speaking to someone, I could tell them about myself and who I am and why I'm running and what I'm fighting for. And I would hear over and over and over on the doors, even Republicans, it would say, I'm not going to vote for every single Democrat, but I like your kind of Democrat. And focusing on cost and corruption and kitchen table issues, the issues that apply to 3.2 million Iowans, what I call common sense, prayer, populism. One by one, Iowan by Iowan, whether it was a Democrat, independent or Republican, won them over. And that's what it's going to take to be able to win in a state like Iowa. Let's say, man, when you won that race by six votes, you had to be thinking back on all those stairs. That had to be like the best feeling in the world. I don't know. I don't know what your highest success was in wheelchair basketball, but that had to feel pretty damn good. Strangely, actually, I was disappointed because I had worked so incredibly hard and I thought I have absolutely outworked my opponent. I definitely am going to win this. So to only win by six votes. And then also, I knew it was going to go to a recount and you never know how that was going to be. But I mean, it was an enormous amount of pride. I will say this out of everything that I've done, including winning gold medals and representing my country on the field of play, the greatest honor that I've ever had is representing my community in the Iowa legislature without a doubt. I want to talk about that case you're making to those Republican voters that you met at the door and fast forwarding to today what that case would look like in 2026. Because Trump wins state by double digits. I turn out it's part of the game, of course, but you're going to have to win people that voted for Donald Trump, kind of a lot of them. And so I'm wondering what the case is that you're making to that Trump voter when you hear him right now. The case is that Iowans are hurting all across the state and it's because of bad federal policy. We are a state that is dead last for economic growth. We're 48th for personal income growth. We're one of two states already in an economic decline. We're basically dead last for nearly every healthcare metric. We've closed 250 more clinics and we've opened over the last 15 years, only state with a growing cancer rate now leading the nation in farm foreclosures because of the tariffs. Iowans are hurting in a very, very real way. And then you add that into the fact that this is the first time since 1968 that there's no power of incumbency, open governor's race along with an open Senate race and two open congressional races. And this is a state that is a common sense state that in Trump's first midterm, we win three of the four congressional races, almost win all four. And in 2022, we're only 1.5% away from having three of our six statewide officials being Democrats. This is a common sense state that has bottomed out no power of incumbency and great candidates like myself and Rob Sand with proven abilities to be able to win over independence and moderate Republicans in Iowans all over the state. It doesn't matter urban or rural area are ready for change. And you've got people like Ashley Henson that have absolutely voted to decimate the state. She voted for 110,000 Iowans to lose their healthcare, thousands more to lose food assistance, 119,000 Iowans seeing their healthcare premiums double or triple because of her not continuing the ACA subsidies. Someone that didn't support a ban on stock trading. Meanwhile, she's become 10 times more wealthy. Someone that has supported the idea of raising the age of social security. You could go on and on and on. Ashley Henson has not looked out for Iowans. She's just been a rubber stamp for Trump and just looked out for the billionaires and the 1% of the lobbyists and the donors. And Iowans are tired of that. They're fed up and they want someone that's going to go out there and fight for them. And all these people that are hurting all across Iowa, I can say, I know you're hurting. I've been there. I've felt that struggle because I've grown up in the same way. And this is why I'm doing this because you need a fighter for you in the U.S. Senate. I want that to be true. I want to live in that world where the Trump voters are responsive to their economic concerns. I'm not 100% sure that they are. And I always think back to like when I Joe Manchin on the pod, it's like West Virginia. I mean, if there's any state being governed worse than Iowa, it's West Virginia. And they keep watching Republicans. And so that makes me wonder if it's cultural issues, right? And people aren't, maybe they say they're voting their economic concerns, but deeply it's a cultural thing. And I look at, I hit the hints and add that she's put out against you. The two issues she brings up is sex changes for kids and amnesty for criminal illegals. And so I'm wondering how you kind of respond to that attack and to the broader question of whether there's like a cultural disconnect between the Democrats and Iowans. I think that if we're going to win in Iowa, I think it's going to be a good thing. It's going to be on cost. It's going to be on kitchen table issues. It's going to be on corruption. And the one thing that I would say is, look, we don't have to win this 100 to zero. There are certainly Republicans that regardless of what happens in the state or in the country, they're going to continue to support and vote that direction. But all we have to do is just get one more vote than Ashley Henson to be able to win this. And what I know is you've got 37% of the voters here in Iowa that are independents. And I've got a unique ability between my story, background, resume and my politics, focusing on the kitchen table issues, cost and corruption as a common sense, prairie populist that has a proven ability to be able to win these folks over. I know that. Again, I represent two communities. Trump won Carter Lake by 18 points. One council blessed by 10 points. I was able to win my district by nearly six points. I know that I have a unique ability to be able to connect with these people. And it's by focusing on the issues that apply to this economic populism. It's prairie populism and not focusing so much on the kitchen table issues. They can bring up all these distractionary issues. But the reality is you can't lie to people. When people are struggling just to afford groceries, just to pay their electric bill, can't keep food on the table and now can't keep gas in their tanks. And you are leading the nation in foreign foreclosures and farmers all over the state. Tell me over and over and over what we feel is betrayal because Trump gives $20 billion to Argentina. Are Iowa farmers, soybean farmers, or upside down in their commodities prices? Islands are ready for change in a real way. On that immigration question, look, man, I hear you. I hear everything you said. I worked for McCain's campaign in Iowa in 2008. And I remember being shocked. I was a kid from the Colorado suburbs. I liked McCain, because he was a moderate Republican. I was one of the guys that you were trying to get in this election. Not anymore, but I was back then and I went to this town hall. I think it was a council of loves actually. Now that I think about it, and he does Q&As. And it's like the first nine questions are about immigration. That doesn't make any sense to me why immigration was so important to Iowa voters, but it was important then and that was 18 years ago now. Crap, I'm getting old. And now Ashley Hinton's using that same issue in an ad against you. So how do you talk to Iowa voters about that issue? Because for whatever reason, they do seem to care about it. I mean, I certainly think that my voting record speaks to my ability to part ways with my party. I was one of three Democrats to vote for a bill here in Iowa to try to address immigration in a common sense way in lieu of any federal activity. And honestly, it shouldn't be addressed at the state level, but that's because of the failure of people like Ashley Hinton being willing to do something about it. I also can talk about it in a personal way. I'm married to an immigrant. I've gone through the process and I say that if you have come here legally, you've committed violent crimes, then you should no longer be here. I recognize that we need to have safe and secure borders, but we also need to have an easier pathway to citizenship for individuals that want to come here and work hard and make their communities better. You can have both. They're not mutually exclusive. And so I think talking about it in a common sense way is the way forward. I think that's where I was. I think that's where Americans are. One other funny thing on the cultural question that I've had a couple of other issues is this guy, Zach Lane, wins the governor's race. It'll be Rob Sandron against him, not you. I didn't know anything about him. He comes out of nowhere. Turns out I think he is from Kansas until about two minutes ago, but I pull up his Twitter feed. I'm doing a deep dive, a personal deep dive last night around midnight because I'm a sicko. And his Twitter bio is talking about how he wants to restore Iowa's culture and heritage. He's not even from Iowa. He lived in Kansas until two minutes ago. But I'm not sure what you're up against, right? I don't even know what that means. Like in the South, we know what it means when people say heritage, not hate. But like what is he even talking about when he's not restoring culture and heritage? Like how do you respond to that? I don't know how to respond to that other than to say, if you want to restore Iowa to the way that we were, we were number one in public education and now we've precipitously dropped. So we need somebody that's going to actually go out there and fight for our public schools. And I believe public money belongs in public schools. We had vibrant rural communities that are being absolutely decimated because of bad federal policy. These rural communities are being hollowed out because we're only looking out for the billionaires and the large multinational corporations we've done. Nothing on small businesses. These small communities have lost their pharmacies. They've lost their grocery stores. We're closing healthcare clinics all over the state because of Medicaid cuts, because of what Ashley Henson has voted for there. And now we're even closing the public schools. These are the pillars of these rural communities. So if he's talking about bringing Iowa back, what we need is we need prairie populists like we had for 30 years with Senator Harkin and actually policies that are going to actually help the middle class that's being hollowed out. And that's a livable wage, affordable housing, affordable healthcare, drinkable water, addressing our cancer rates and addressing the corruption that we're seeing both at the state level and at the federal level. Let's talk about the drinkable water. That was a new one to me. I was my colleagues here along with this focus groups and I was listening to our Iowa focus groups for this interview. And several people brought up the cancer water in Iowa and shows you haven't read my Des Moines register lately because that was a new one to me. I like what's happening with that? Like what is the concern and controversy around the water in Iowa? Yeah, well, we have the second highest rates of cancer behind only Kentucky. We put zero dollars, essentially, of state appropriation. Every single year I was in the legislature. I sponsored a bill to put one dollar for every single I once to address this with the big, beautiful bill that Ashley Henson supported. We ended up losing what little money that we had coming in to address the cancer crisis here in Iowa, $34 million. The cancer crisis has certainly touched my life deeply and personally. I lost my grandmother, pancreatic cancer, my father because of exposure to Agent Orange has dealt with several bouts of cancer. And nearly the day that I launched this campaign, my sister got diagnosed with stage two breast cancer, has private insurance. And the private insurance basically said, you don't have enough cancer. If you don't have stage three or stage four, we won't cover the PET scan to see if the cancer spread other parts of your body. And so first and foremost, we need to return the funding that we lost. We also need to make sure that we've got guardrails on insurance companies because doctors should be citing care, not insurance companies. And then we have to address the root cause of this cancer crisis, which is the water quality crisis. And we've got a nitrate level crisis and we need to put more infrastructure to be able to address that. We need more incentives to our farmers. This is to prevent them from incentivize them from putting down fertilizer in the winter months to incentivize them to put down cover crops. Land barriers, like a lot of states mandate. We certainly don't want to put any more financial burden in onus because we're at risk of, I mean, we're really in a farm again here, but we've got to address this nitrate level issue that we've got with our water quality because it is absolutely leading to our cancer rates. And this is what I want to fight for in the U.S. Senate. Let's talk a little bit more about that farm again. And this is something I've been reading a lot about, but I'm not out there. You're actually talking to these folks. A lot of discussion around the tariffs, obviously, but now the war in Iran has created increase in costs around fertilizer, which is going to affect Iowa. You mentioned the farm bankruptcies. I was reading also about suicides up in farm country. How are people being impacted directly on the ground? Like, is it the tariffs is a fertilizer? Like, give me some anecdotes about what you're hearing. Everywhere that I'm going, I mean, it is a scary place right now in time to be an Iowa farmer. It is. It's a farm again. It's a second farm crisis. We're hearing from farmers all across the state. I mean, what we hear is this is betrayal and we'll hear this is just one gut punch after another. The first issue is, yes, absolutely, the tariffs have crushed our farmers. And that's why we hear betrayal. Trump administration gives $20 billion to Argentina. Meanwhile, our Iowa soybean farmers are upside down on their commodities prices. But it's not just that. That's just the most recent issue. We've done nothing to address the monopolies that have led to input prices being basically doubled. The war in Iran has certainly led to increased cost in diesel fuel, but that's also led to increased cost on fertilizer. I mean, I was hearing over and over from farmers saying, I'm not even sure I'm going to be able to afford fertilizer. Meanwhile, as we're coming into planting season, the federal level, we haven't done anything. Is that right? So I was getting mixed reasons. So when, because some people are saying like, ah, this is not a big deal right now because a lot of farmers pre-buy their fertilizer, you know, but that's, but you are getting into fall planting season. And I guess some of them haven't. That's what you're hearing. I that's what I was hearing. I was hearing a significant amount of them were concerned about not even being able to afford any fertilizers. They were, they were going into planting season. They're on me and also at the federal level, look, we've done nothing on right to repair, to allow farmers to actually be able to repair their equipment in timely manner. I sponsored a bill in the Iowa legislature to address this at the state level in lieu of action at the federal level. We haven't, we don't have mandatory of country of origin labeling on our beef producers. This is why we've lost a hundred thousand beef producers in this country over the last 10 years, and we haven't passed the farm bill. And what I'd like to do, if I'm able to get up to the United States Senate is to put a mandate on Congress that when the five years is up for a farm bill, that Congress is not able to adjourn without able, without passing a farm bill. I mean, we have, what Ashley Henson and our Iowa delegation has not looked out for our rural communities or our farmers. And I think that they are waking up and they're ready for change. They're ready for a genuine common sense, prior populace like myself, that is actually going to look out for them, not just faux populism. I love the right to repair. That's a good one. That's a good populist issue. All right, man. I'm sure you've got other things to get to. Are you going to have time to watch the NBA finals tonight? Do you think game one? I don't know. I would love to. Maybe on your phone. For anybody. Well, you're kind of. For anybody, anybody out there. Look, I love Wimbayana. He's, I mean, is a long time basketball player. He's such a unique individual, but I think basketball is at its best when the mecca of basketball is rocking. And so I'm actually rooting for the next to win for the first time since 73. All right. If you're going to model yourself, you know, from your wheelchair basketball career after, you know, one of the players in the NBA, is there somebody that you look to? I thought that I had a game that, that maybe somebody like a Carmelo Anthony. I was kind of a point forward. I was somebody that shot the ball a whole lot. I didn't have a whole lot of assist in college. I scored over 4,000 career points. I led the leagues in scoring. I led the USA team in scoring. That was really my knack. I was great from the mid range. That was my, that was my string. I love that. Mellow volume shooter, maybe if Jalen Brunson, maybe of the of the guys playing tonight, that's right. Did a little more post up shooting than Jalen Brunson, but I like, I like, I love Jalen Brunson. I like the game and I'm looking forward to a good finals. San Antonio against New York. It's going to be a good one. All right, man. Good luck out there on the campaign trail. Thank you, A, for, for anyone out there real quick. If you're interested, please join us. Turrick for Iowa, Turrick, the number four Iowa.com. Really do believe that this is a generational opportunity that we've got to be able to win the Senate seat back here. If we can win the Senate seat, I believe we can get to 51 in the U S Senate. We can fundamentally change the state of Iowa and we can change this country, but we can only do it with with your help. Good politician, good comms team remembering to do that. I usually remember to tee up the website, but as a former flak, but we were getting into bad, you know, once we got into basketball talk, it flittered out of my mind. So 10 months, I'm getting my reps and getting my 10,000 hours. Oh, buddy. I'm hoping to get up to Iowa in the fall. So hopefully we'll have a chance to overlap in person or I could look at the campaign trail. Thank you. All right. Thanks so much to Luke Russard and to Josh Turrick. We'll be back, I think another doubleheader tomorrow. So it's going to be another good one. Hope to see you all then. Peace. The Bork podcast is brought to you thanks to the work of lead producer Katie Cooper, associate producer, Ansley Skipper, and with video editing by Katie Lutz and audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.