Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis

The World Awaits: U.S. Threats Against Iran Escalate, Armin Rosen on How Israelis See the Iran Crisis, Republican Dissent Begins & Pam Bondi's Ousting

38 min
Apr 8, 202610 days ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

Bill O'Reilly analyzes escalating U.S. military action against Iran, including strikes on Kharg Island oil infrastructure, with discussion of Israeli public support (75%) and Republican dissent. The episode covers polling showing American opposition to the conflict, media narratives labeling Trump a war criminal, and the geopolitical implications of Iran potentially acquiring nuclear weapons.

Insights
  • Public opposition to Iran military action stems from lack of historical context about Iranian threats and nuclear program risks rather than informed policy disagreement
  • European allies are notably absent from military support despite sovereign territory attacks, suggesting NATO's functional military capacity is limited to US, Israel, and Ukraine
  • The core policy question—whether Iran should possess nuclear weapons—is deliberately avoided by critics who instead focus on tactical objections and Trump administration criticism
  • Iranian regime's indifference to civilian casualties and willingness to accept martyrdom makes traditional negotiation strategies ineffective
  • Media polarization ensures any Trump action receives automatic opposition regardless of strategic merit, creating a no-win political scenario
Trends
Weaponization of 'war crimes' narrative as political messaging tool against military actionDeclining late-night television viewership and format viability despite high-profile host replacementsFringe left-wing organizations (ACLU) using mainstream media platforms for fundraising despite radical policy positionsGeopolitical realignment with Gulf states rejecting Iranian 'protection racket' in Strait of HormuzAmerican public disconnection from foreign policy consequences despite economic impact from global conflictsIsraeli-American military coordination intensifying while traditional European allies remain diplomatically sidelinedNuclear proliferation concerns driving long-term strategic decisions despite short-term economic painChinese economic interests (80% oil from Iran) creating backdoor constraints on US military targeting decisions
Companies
CNN
Aired ACLU fundraising commercial promoting far-left policy positions; conducted polling on Iran military action appr...
CBS
Announced Byron Allen will replace Stephen Colbert with new late-night comedy format 'Comics Unleashed'
Tablet Magazine
Online publication about Jewish life and identity; employer of guest correspondent Armin Rosen
New York Times
Published report on Netanyahu's February presentation to Trump outlining potential Iranian leadership replacements
Allen Media Group
Byron Allen's media company; positioned to produce new CBS late-night comedy program
News Nation
Cable news network where O'Reilly appeared discussing Iran nuclear weapons policy
People
Armin Rosen
Discussed Israeli public support (75%) for Iran military action and geopolitical implications of conflict
Ron Johnson
Republican expressing opposition to attacks on Iranian civilian infrastructure
Pam Bondi
Ousted by President Trump; O'Reilly speculates reasons related to Epstein file and Comey indictment failures
Byron Allen
64-year-old billionaire replacing Stephen Colbert on CBS with new late-night comedy format
Seth Moulton
Far-left congressman claiming Iran is winning the war; criticized by O'Reilly as not serious analyst
Richard Blumenthal
Promoted 'war crimes' narrative against Trump administration military action
Donald Trump
Central figure in Iran military strategy; subject of war crimes accusations and polling disapproval
Benjamin Netanyahu
Presented list of potential Iranian leaders to Trump in February; accused of directing US military strategy
Stephen Colbert
Being replaced on late-night show on May 21st; O'Reilly speculates lawsuit concerns delayed departure
Leland Vittert
Interviewed O'Reilly about Iran nuclear weapons policy
Quotes
"Is it okay with you that Iran have a nuclear weapon? That's it. Nobody answers that question."
Bill O'ReillyMid-episode
"The free world really only has three functioning militaries. It's the United States, it's Israel and it's Ukraine."
Armin RosenGuest segment
"Israelis have dealt with terrorism as a daily reality for 30 or even 40 years by now. Not as something that could happen, but something that inevitably happens."
Armin RosenGuest segment
"The moals really don't have anything to lose because they don't care about their own people. They don't care how many people die."
Bill O'ReillyOpening segment
"President Trump can't win. If the United States were to pull back, he'd be surrendering. If we do, then he's a war criminal."
Bill O'ReillyTalking Points Memo
Full Transcript
Jamie Lang and Sophie Habou have arrived on Disney Plus. We're having a baby! We're having a baby! I've always wanted to be a mum. And we're bringing you on our journey through everything. I have no idea what we're doing. Thank you. I have more of an idea. I think of it like a Tamagotchi. At the end of all of this... We're gonna have a little baby. Raising Chelsea, a Hulu original series streaming exclusively on Disney Plus. 18 Plus subscription required. Tee's and Tee's apply. Hey, Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the No Spin News. Tuesday, April 7, 2026. Stand up for your country. The world awaits. The USA action in Iran. Just logistically, we are taping this in the late afternoon on April 7. If something happens, we will be tweeting almost immediately. And then I will try to update messages throughout. So just keep it at BillOReilly.com. And we will kind of guide you through what's happening. So I'm gonna be around all night. Gonna be watching it. Big story, obviously. Now, I feel sorry for the Persian people. They are in the kill zone. No doubt about it. And a lot of women and children. It's been that in the year 3,093. Over there. Yes, they are at fault for putting up with this theocracy for so many years. We know the fearsome and fanatical government they have. But if you put yourself in their place and you see thousands of people executed who are sent from the government, it's a hard thing to do. It's gotta be an organization. And the moals have a very tight grip, as we all know. 200,000 in the army over there. That's a lot of people. And so, as we discussed yesterday in detail, moals really don't have anything to lose because they don't care about their own people. They don't care how many people die. And a lot of them, they don't even care if they die. Because then they're gonna go to heaven, there'd be martyrs or whatever their crazy belief system is. So you're negotiating with people who don't really care. And I made the comparison to Putin. Putin doesn't care about his people at all. Now, Putin doesn't want to die himself. So there's a little bit of a difference. But very hard to negotiate with these suicide people. The Nazis, the SS in World War II, the Tojo government in Japan. We've seen it throughout history. But the United States has taken this on. And we will report responsibly, unlike, you know, 80% of the other media, which won't. So we'll keep it here. The Talking Points memo is the latest US military struck Kharg Island. That's the big distribution center for Iranian oil. It didn't blow up the oil because of China. China gets 80% of its oil from Iran. And, you know, there's back channels there. The United States does not want to alienate China in this whole thing. So it took out a lot of the military on Kharg Island. Bunkers, storage facilities, things like that. But did not bomb the oil itself. That may happen. It may not. But there's no doubt in my mind, I know this turf pretty well, that the United States is going to try to protect the oil supply, the world's oil supply. Two major railroad lines have stopped in Iran. Israelis warn that government not to run those trains. Because it will be blown off the tracks, apparently. And then the worldwide reaction is interesting. President Trump can't win. He can't win. So if the United States were to pull back at the last minute and not bomb Iran, then he'd be surrendering. Then he'd be, you know, Teflon, whatever they call him. If we do, then he's a war criminal. You see, this is the advise that the American left has clamped down on President Trump. No matter what he does, he loses in their eyes. And they'll obviously control a lot of what the messaging is that goes out from the media. Now, the latest is the war criminal thing. This is just new this week. But this is a well thought out campaign. World tape. We should note that destroying civilian power infrastructure is generally considered to constitute a war crime under international law. And that would be on its face a violation of the laws of war and would be a war crime. He is continuously threatening to commit war crimes. A few hours later, he put out an extra post teasing some weeknight war crimes. Tuesday, 8 p.m. Eastern time. Okay, he could be announcing a military attack in prime time tomorrow. The clear answer is yes. It would be a war crime. It's not clear and a guy's an idiot, Blumenthal, a senator from Connecticut. Now, I'm not big on name calling, but he truly is. And so is Murphy, the other senator from Connecticut. We've been over this turf before. So the war criminal thing is now in motion. The next thing to come up will be the assertion that Iran is actually winning the war. Go. The reaction is that Iran is gaining leverage over us as this war goes on. And I've been saying for over a week that Iran is winning the war. Yeah, because you're an idiot too. This is Seth Moulton, a congressman from Massachusetts. These are far left people. I mean, these aren't serious people. They're not looking at the situation and trying to analyze it with any kind of objectivity at all. The United States, I'm losing. We are basically trying to get some kind of an arrangement where Iran will walk away from their nukes. And we are doing it with the civilian casualties in mind. That's what's restraining us right now, the war criminal thing. And on the polling, you get to understand, most people don't know the history of this. If you rake in front of evil, we get into that's why I put the Ayatollahomania on the cover. I mean, how evil this thing has been going on for 50 years. They've killed thousands of Americans, but most people don't know. All they know is they're paying more. Okay, so this is a CNN poll. First question, what is your view of the U.S. decision to take military action inside Iran? Approve 34, disprove 66%. Okay, next one in your view is the war in Iran worth the toll it's taken on American lives and the financial burden it places on the U.S. government, or is the war not worth these costs? Worth it 70, yes, worth it 29. Okay, I don't dispute that. You know, the propaganda element in all this and the recent history of Iraq and Afghanistan. People are confused. They don't know about the nukes and how close and all of that. All they know is they're paying more at the gas farm. Okay, another poll, the economist. Okay, do you support or oppose the war with Iran? Support 28, oppose 59, pretty much the same as the CNN, a little bit better numbers for Trump there. Second question, do you approve or disprove the way Donald Trump's handling situation? Approve 30, disprove 60, no opinion 10. Okay, so consumer pain and the stock market too. I got my statement, I went, oh, look at this. But I understand a big picture here. I got it. So my personal situation doesn't enter into my analysis of what the right thing to do is for the world. And let me end this Talking Points memo with this situation. When I'm confronted with a person who opposes US action, I asked one simple question because I'm a simple man. Is it okay with you that Iran have a nuclear weapon? That's it. So Pope Leo, that would be my question for the Pope. Okay, all of the NATO leaders said okay. With you that Iran have this device because that's what it's all about. Nobody answers that question. They don't answer. They go off into flights of this and that, or well, he should have done in this, or he doesn't have the goal, or he didn't. It's all tactics. It's not bottom line. So that's interesting. Finally, after all of this is done, no matter how it comes out, and I said this was the biggest risk that President Trump has taken in his administration, and it could go either way. You remember, I said that. But no matter how it goes, the Democrats are going to use this tactic. Here's the speaker of the minority speaker of the House. Something is really wrong with this guy, clearly. And at minimum, we need a wellness check. He's unhinged. He's out of control. And this is not presidential behavior or anything close to it. And some of my Republican colleagues need to actually step up and recognize something is wrong at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Okay, don't worry about that. None of that's going to happen. Financial stress is hitting an all time high. Millions of Americans are stretched thin with no extra money, no room to breathe. And this isn't just lower income households. Middle class families are also running out of options. If debt has been weighing on you, you are not alone. And waiting usually makes things worse. Interest grows. Minimum payments trap you. Nothing changes. You don't need another loan or to consider bankruptcy. You need a strategy. That's why I like done with debt. They build a smart personalized plan around you and understand what it takes to work toward the biggest reductions possible. Whether you owe $10,000 or much more, their goal is simple, lower what you owe. So you keep more of your paycheck. Start with a free consultation at donewithdebt.com. Done with debt.com. I'm going to tell you about the most unforgettable gift you can get mom this Mother's Day. Have you heard of Gold Belly? It's this amazing site that celebrates the best of America by shipping our country's most iconic foods from legendary eateries straight to your door. And they'll ship anywhere across the nation, free in time for Mother's Day. I'm loving my lobster rolls and Levain Bakery Cookies from Gold Belly. Shipping is quick and the quality outstanding. So if you are looking to make Mother's Day perfect or just want to impress your friends and family with an epic meal, next time you host them, please go to goldbelly.com. Get free shipping and 20% off your first order with promo code BIL. That's goldbelly.com, code BIL, free shipping, 20% off your first order. And that's a memo. Joining us now from Brooklyn, New York is Armin Rosen, who's a correspondent lodge for Tablet Magazine, which is an online outlet about Jewish life and identity. So I'm assuming that the Israelis support pretty much everything that's going on here. Would I be wrong on that? Well, polls in Israel right now show that something like 75% of the Jewish population supports Israel's actions in Iran currently. And there's very high support for continuing this as long as, kind of as long as it takes in order to make Iran so weak that Israelis no longer feel like they no longer have to worry about them, which is remarkable because Israelis have been running in and out of bomb shelters for five or six weeks by now. They believe in kind of finishing this job, but the stakes for them are much different than they are for the United States. The U.S. homeland is not under constant daily attack the same way that Israel's home front is. You know, Israeli and U.S. interests in this conflict are potentially quite different. But for the time being, the two militaries are working quite closely to deal a profound amount of damage to this regime pretty much every single day. So Israelis are used to suffering economically because of terrorism, but Americans are not directly suffering. Would that be an accurate statement? Yeah, I think it's true. I mean, Israelis have dealt with terrorism as a daily reality for 30 or even 40 years by now. Not as something that could happen, but something that inevitably happens. You know, at least since in the last 20 years, probably the country has had, you know, maybe tens of thousands of rockets and missiles fired at it at some point or another. You remember how people in the United States kind of lost their minds about a single Chinese spy balloon? The experiences are just kind of much, much different. But I think Americans do have recent experience of very far away events having an effect on our lives and on our bottom lines. There was a rather large spike in various commodities after the Russian invasion of Ukraine a few years ago, many of which are on the same scale or even larger than the increases we've seen the past few weeks. You know, we are not completely insulated from world events. And the people who are predicting an Iranian victory basically think that the Iranians can inflict enough economic damage or anxiety on Americans to basically convince us that somehow we've lost. Back away. Back away. Right. Are you surprised that the polling in America is so anti the Trump administration's military strategy? Are you surprised? I'm actually not that surprised at the end of the day. American politics are very highly polarized for one thing. Anything that Trump does is going to be opposed by vast numbers of people almost no matter what. But also, you know, I've been writing about the U.S. Iranian relationship for a long time, particularly around the time of the nuclear deal a decade ago. And people forget this, but that deal was actually very unpopular, something like between 55 and 60% you know, poll after poll after poll showed that there was decisive opposition to the Obama administration's deal. But I think that also just reflected the polarization of the time I think Americans don't really think all that deeply about foreign policy for the most part, nor should they. The Iranian nuclear program is not an issue that people think affects their daily lives, particularly. It's a highly technical issue. That's the reason that it became, you know, very easy to kind of, you know, massage public opinion on these issues because Americans don't really confront them very often. Again, in reality, a world where Iran has a nuke is one that is generally less stable, one where the US is not in control of the various things that we need America to be in control of for our lives to be as safe and comfortable as they are. Yeah. Well, I mean, look, anybody uses nuclear weapon North Korea or anybody, the whole world gets thrown into a depression number one. And the whole alignment that we have changes. And that brings me to there are a significant amount of Europeans and Americans who believe that somehow Netanyahu and Israel calling shots here and that Trump's going along with it. You've heard that, right? Yes. I think it's not really true. I mean, there's a report in the New York Times, just a few minutes ago, actually right before I came on, you know, recounting this presentation that Trump gave, excuse me, that Netanyahu gave to Trump back in February, basically, basically, you know, providing like a list of potential leaders of Iran, and arguing, you know, that it would basically be this war would be easy. It's true that events like that probably did happen in some form or another. But the reality is that the regime in Tehran has been very opposed the United States for many decades. And Trump himself has highlighted that threat, you know, for the last 47 years. He said in both of his campaigns for president that he considered Iran to be a major threat to the United States. And Iran has killed, you know, directly killed far more American soldiers than they have killed. Both side bombs in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Now, this leads into the anti-Semitism that we're seeing in America and Europe. Europe is worse, far worse, I think, in that area than America is, because the European leaders actually fear the influx of Muslims, particularly in Great Britain and France. They fear them. And here we don't have that. It's just a matter of propaganda and crazy college kids running around. But this Iranian thing, the world is sitting it out. Did that surprise you? There are aspects of it that I do find really not just surprising but shocking. You know, in the early days of this war, there was a drone fired from Lebanon, probably by Hezbollah, at the British base in Akritiri in Cyprus. Akritiri is sovereign British territory. It's not just an overseas base. You know, the British are allowing, you know, various basing rights to the United States as part of this war, but they've been kind of irrelevant beyond that. I mean, I think it's pretty clear by now that the free world really only has three functioning militaries. You know, look, it's the United States, it's Israel and it's Ukraine. You know, the British, the French, all of these countries that are part of our larger security architecture have sat this out, even though I believe there was a French soldier killed a few weeks ago. And again, British sovereign territory has come under attack by Iranian proxies since this began. I mean, they're concerned about escalation spirals, right, the European diplomatic stance is always to push for de-escalation and compromise. But at the same time, you know, these are events that are considered great provocations to countries that are supposedly... Nine more. ...their players in the world and they don't seem to be. Nine more. I think that the irrationality and emotion of this has overtaken the logistical danger and really what it's all about. Last word. Yeah, I mean, look, this is a very novel conflict, you know. There hasn't really been a war like this where a rival country's leadership was decapitated in the opening hours, where this much has been destroyed this quickly, but where it seems like the pre-existing political order of the country under attack is going to survive, we're in all kinds of uncharted territory. But if the war ended today, the Iranians would be rebuilding for an awfully long time. They would be far more isolated than they were when this began. It's clear that the Gulf states, you know, are not about to be led into, you know, they're not going to put up with having to tolerate an Iranian protection racket in the Strait of Hormuz, which I think is going to prove to be a toxic asset for the Iranians, assuming they can even control it at the end of this. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets, and meanwhile China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver. Through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold, and you can do this, get precious metals delivered to your door, or place an attack's advantage, Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty free, with billions in precious metals delivered, thousands of five-star reviews, and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text BIL to 998-8999. Again, that's 866-326-5576 or text BIL to 998-8999. And also, there was quite a bit of instability inside of Iran in the months after the war last year, right? There were huge protests back in January, and Iran took far less damage. You know, the regime has come under far more sustained attack now than they did back then. I think people predicting that they know exactly what's going to happen inside of Iran in the next few months or diluting themselves. Nobody knows. The one thing we do know is that if it stopped today, Iran would still have the uranium enrichment program. And that's why it isn't stopping today. Trump can't live with that. That's where he staked it all out. So anyway, Amon, thanks very much. We really appreciate you coming on, talking to us today. Thank you. The Republicans, they're not all in lockstep here. So, Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin, he does not want the Trump administration to go in and attack civilians for old tape. I am hoping and praying that President Trump, this really is bluster. I do not want to see us start blowing up civilian infrastructure. I do not want to see that. We are not at war with the Iranian people. We are trying to liberate them. Okay, so there isn't a heavy drumbeat, but there are Republicans who don't want to be part of this. The attacks on civilian targets. Okay, in other political news, I've been getting a lot of mail about Pam Bondi, 60 years old. The former Attorney General was ousted by President Trump. Now, what you need to know is this. No one can cover the departments of the federal government because it's like Department of War, it's the Department of Justice, whatever it may be. The issue reports at the end of the year, the Inspector Generals go in, tell you what's going on. But on a day-to-day basis, yes, there are correspondence, okay, there, and they're reporting what actually happens. But really, the inner relationship between a president and one of his cabinet members, Ms. Bondi, undefined. All you can do is guess. Now, I like Pam Bondi. Okay, I like her. I think she did a good job in Florida. I don't know why she got the boot here. I suspect it was failing to control the Epstein file thing, failing to bring Comey to indictment, and Letitia James to indictment. I think those three things President Trump felt were not positives, obviously, in his point of view. So that's why Bondi went, this is a guess. All right, Artemis II broke the record furthest travel away from Earth by any human beings. And they're coming back on Friday. There'll be a celebration. I hope this Iran thing does not intrude. It's a great achievement by America. $4 billion, so it should be great. Zipped around the moon, 10-day mission. They got to see the other side of the moon. And the reason they're doing that is because the federal government, and this will supersede Trump's term, wants to land again on the moon. Remember, Apollo 17 was in 1972. It's just really expensive to do this. And as you know, we're in huge debt here. But that's the plan, to put people on the moon again, and then to do something in Mars. You know, I don't know. Is it worth the money? You got to make the call on that. All right, ACLU, the American Civil Liberties Union. I'm only bringing this to your attention because it's very interesting. So I'm watching all the networks last night, just flipping around to see who's the most irresponsible. Okay, who's doing what? That's part of my job. I have to do it. I don't want to do it. I much rather watch the game. But I can't watch the game. I got to watch this stuff. So up pops on CNN a fundraiser commercial for the ACLU. Roll it. The press are seeing their freedoms taken away at an alarming rate. Freedom some of us take for granted. The right to vote, equal access to health care, book banning and other forms of censorship that threaten our right to learn, and here's something truly shocking. Right now in our country, hundreds of thousands of people are incarcerated simply because they couldn't afford bail. That's not free, and it's not fair. But there is hope for change. It lives in people like you, and in a great organization called the American Civil Liberties Union. So please join me and other concerned Americans in defending our civil liberties by joining the ACLU as a guardian of liberty today. All it takes is just $19 a month, only 63 cents a day. When you're surrounded by oppressive laws, you can't just sit back and be oppressed. You get up and fight, and all of us at the ACLU are fighting for you. No, they're not fighting for me. They're fringe far left lunatics. So here's what the ACLU really supports. Here's what they really, if you send them $19 a month, this is what they're going to try to do. Unlimited abortion. They know restraints whatsoever. Anti-ice, that means amnesty for everybody. Do away with ice. Reduce the prison population by 50%. That means do not punish criminals, even violent criminals. You have to let them out. Anti-police. They don't like the police. The police are racist, according to the ACLU. Trans rights. Men should play women in sports. And race preferences. If you are a person of color, you get better jobs, easier admissions to universities, on and on. That's what the ACLU wants, in addition to open borders and all that. And when I'm watching this thing, I'm going, this is such rank propaganda, I can't even believe it. Now, it's no accident they bought this spot, because they had to pay for it, on CNN. Because that liberal audience there is going, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, my liberties are in the... These are fringe people. Okay. CBS announced he's going to replace Stephen Colbert. I know most of you don't care. Okay. So, there's a guy named Byron Allen, 64 years old. I know him a little bit. He's an okay guy. He's a billionaire. He made a ton of money at the Allen Media Group. And he's going to have a comedian, comics unleashed program, where four comedians sit around. He ripped us off from Goodfell. Goodfell should sue CBS. It's exactly what Goodfell does every night. And CBS is doing it. Okay. So, it's comics unleashed. Now, who is Byron Allen? Well, he is a Democrat, according to Open Secrets, which tracks political donations. All of his money goes to the Democratic Party. That's okay. Because I think CBS will line it up, so it's not going to be like the view. Okay. They'll line it up and get a different point of view. Anyway, Colbert gets the boot on May 21st. I don't know why they kept them this long. I guess they were worried about a lawsuit from him. And then Allen moves in. Do I think Allen will succeed? No, I don't. It's not because of him. I just think late night is shot. Okay. What else do we have here on the rundown? Smart life, the nuclear threat. So, how do you explain to see kids and your grandkids? So, they're running around and they don't know Nagasaki Hiroshima. They don't know Oppenheimer. They don't know. They heard about it, but they don't really know. This is the crux of this whole Iranian thing. I know this, because I did talk to the president about it. All Iran has to do. They say, okay, we'll let in the weapons inspectors to look at what we're doing with the uranium. That's it. That's it. The whole thing ends. All right. So, I'm on News Nation with Leland Wittered last night. Roll tape. Are you for letting Iran have a nuclear weapon? The New York Times seems to be for it. MS seems to be for it. Is that a rhetorical question? All of NATO seems to be for it. No, no, I mean, the Pope seems to be for it. All of these people seem to favor Iran having a nuclear weapon. Why else would they object? Simple man. Why would you object to neutralizing Iran? Because it's a terrorist state. Everybody knows that. And then allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Well, why would you object to that if you didn't support them having a nuclear weapon? I asked that question to all my liberal friends. Nobody answers. Because there is no answer on their part. What they say is, well, we got in there under false pretenses. Trump didn't tell us what the mission was. Trump didn't do this. Trump didn't do that. Boots on the ground. But they never answer the call. Core question. All of these people who object, who would allow Iran to sit there and develop a nuclear weapon. It's okay with them. You've got to boil the argument down. Final thought, coming your way. Okay, final thought, as I mentioned, we'll do it live. The long form podcast drops tomorrow at noon for premium and concierge members. And it's six for everyone else. How we men, Dell set a very hard time in his life. Incredibly hard time. And we get into that. So I think you'll enjoy it. This is a big thing that's happening with us. And I can't say I knew it would work. My younger staff was the one that pushed me into it, but going great. So we want you to watch. We'll do it live. YouTube. That's where you can find it. YouTube. But go to billowrally.com. We just have more lined up. All you do is boop. And then you go right over there. That's the easiest way. Thank you very much for watching and listening to the No Spin News. Remember, I'm on all night. Anything happens, go to the website, and we will update you. See you tomorrow.