The Daily

Sunday Special: A Sea of Streaming Docs

50 min
Nov 16, 20257 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

This episode explores the explosion of documentary content across streaming platforms, examining how the genre has evolved from PBS pledge drive staples to a dominant force in entertainment. Hosts discuss Ken Burns' legacy and new work, the rise of true crime documentaries, and the diverse subgenres reshaping nonfiction filmmaking in the streaming era.

Insights
  • Ken Burns' documentaries function as more than information delivery—they engage with contemporary political and social ideas while appearing to focus on historical subjects, making them subtly radical cultural interventions
  • Documentary funding is increasingly concentrated in three categories: true crime, celebrity reputation-building, and cults, leaving important investigative and social justice documentaries chronically underfunded despite their potential for real-world impact
  • The documentary genre has become so saturated with recognizable tropes that meta-documentaries about documentaries themselves are now a viable subgenre, indicating audience sophistication and genre fatigue
  • Streaming platforms have democratized documentary access but also created a paradox where quantity has increased while funding for non-commercial, socially important work has decreased
  • Nature documentaries represent a category of 'screen savory' content that leverages unprecedented camera technology to create voyeuristic experiences previously impossible, driving a taxonomic explosion of nature series
Trends
Meta-documentary trend: Films about true crime documentaries and the documentary process itself gaining prominence as audiences become genre-savvyStreaming platform consolidation of documentary funding creating winner-take-all dynamics for specific subgenres while marginalizing othersCelebrity-as-executive-producer model becoming dominant funding mechanism for documentaries, shifting creative control and subject selectionNature documentary proliferation with increasingly granular taxonomic organization (by continent, biosphere, ecosystem) despite similar underlying contentDocumentary festival circuit expansion (Doc NYC, others) becoming critical discovery and funding mechanism as streaming algorithms fragment audienceTrue crime documentary saturation leading to critical reassessment and commentary on the genre's ethical implications and cultural impactAccessibility of archival footage and historical materials enabling new documentary forms (e.g., recreating World of Warcraft logs with animation)Public television's role as documentary distributor becoming increasingly significant as commercial platforms consolidate fundingSports documentaries as cultural history mechanism, with ESPN's 30 for 30 establishing template for narrative-driven athletic storytellingDocumentary as memoir and personal essay form gaining legitimacy as alternative to traditional investigative or historical approaches
Topics
Ken Burns Documentary Legacy and MethodologyTrue Crime Documentary Boom and SaturationStreaming Platform Documentary Funding ModelsNature Documentary Technology and ProductionSports Documentary as Cultural HistoryDocumentary Ethics and the Act of SeeingPublic Television's Role in Documentary DistributionCelebrity Documentary and Reputation ManagementDocumentary Subgenres and TaxonomyArchival Footage and Historical RecreationDocumentary Festivals and DiscoveryMeta-Documentary and Genre CommentaryInvestigative Documentary Funding ChallengesDocumentary Cinematography and Visual StorytellingAmerican History Representation in Documentary
Companies
Netflix
Major streaming platform funding true crime documentaries and nature content; discussed as primary distributor of con...
HBO/Max
Streaming service producing and distributing prestige documentaries including Pee-wee S Himself and Look Into My Eyes
PBS
Public broadcasting network historically central to documentary distribution; Ken Burns' primary platform for reachin...
ESPN
Sports media company whose 30 for 30 documentary series established template for narrative sports documentaries
Peacock
Streaming platform distributing SNL 50 Years of Music documentary featuring Quest Love's curation
A24
Film distributor and production company releasing Look Into My Eyes documentary about psychics
New York Times
Publisher of The Daily podcast and employer of episode hosts; operates documentary criticism and analysis
Criterion Channel
Streaming service maintaining comprehensive collection of Olympic documentaries by major filmmakers
People
Ken Burns
Legendary documentary filmmaker with 40+ films; subject of episode discussion for new American Revolution series
Gilbert Cruz
Host of Sunday Special episode; leads documentary discussion and recommendations
James Poniewozik
Chief TV critic at New York Times; provides analysis of Ken Burns' work and documentary trends
Alyssa Wilkinson
Movie critic at New York Times; writes weekly documentary lens column analyzing new documentary releases
Sarah Botsdene
Co-director of Ken Burns' American Revolution documentary series
David Schmidt
Co-director of Ken Burns' American Revolution documentary series
Frederick Wiseman
Documentary filmmaker with 50+ films; discussed as alternative to Ken Burns' public television model
Quest Love
Musician and documentarian who curated SNL 50 Years of Music documentary for Peacock
Kirsten Johnson
Cinematographer and documentary filmmaker; created Camera Person memoir about ethics of documentary seeing
Lana Wilson
Documentary director of Look Into My Eyes about psychics; discussed for non-judgmental approach to subject
Leon Gast
Director of When We Were Kings documentary about 1974 Muhammad Ali vs George Foreman fight
Muhammad Ali
Subject of multiple documentaries discussed; featured in When We Were Kings and American Revolution
Paul Reubens
Pee-wee Herman performer; subject of HBO documentary Pee-wee S Himself
Norman Mailer
Writer and talking head in When We Were Kings documentary about Muhammad Ali
George Plimpton
Writer and talking head in When We Were Kings documentary; discussed for distinctive presence
Spike Lee
Filmmaker featured as talking head in When We Were Kings documentary
Quotes
"What he is trying to do is sort of create a canon of American history. You know, whatever we think about the present, we agree, you know, this stuff happened in the past and it happened for, you know, probably these reasons and this is where we came from."
James PoniewozikEarly discussion of Ken Burns' approach
"I think to try to do that to everyone, as opposed to your own personal amen corner, is really kind of like, that's metal. You know, it's like a very like radical thing to do now."
James PoniewozikOn Ken Burns' inclusive approach to American history
"There's not a lot of money for documentaries unless they fall into a couple of different categories, one of which is cults, one of which is true crimes. One is sort of the reputation, burnishing celebrity marketing documentary."
Alyssa WilkinsonOn documentary funding landscape
"I want you to be a take and idea. His National Parks documentary... it was like, you know, the National Parks were like America's greatest idea and we preserved this land."
James PoniewozikOn what makes Burns' documentaries meaningful
"It's a movie putting you in the room. And it's just asking you to say, what's happening or it or maybe not ask what's happening, but just to be there."
Alyssa WilkinsonOn Lana Wilson's Look Into My Eyes approach
Full Transcript
I'm Kevin Russe. I'm Casey Newton and we're the hosts of Hard Fork, a show from the New York Times about technology in the future. About the future that's already here, Kevin, every week on the show we bring you news from the front lines of tech, interviews with key news makers, wacky experiments that we get up to and we just generally have a lot of fun. Yes, so whether you're curious about developments in AI or just what's happening on TikTok, we are here for you. So that's Hard Fork. You can find it wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Gilbert Cruz and this is the Sunday special. There was a time when documentaries could only be found on public television and maybe at your local art house theater. But today, if you fire up almost any streaming service, you'll find that they're chock full of documentaries, true crime documentaries, celebrity documentaries, music documentaries, poop cruise documentaries, maybe there's just the one poop cruise documentary. Today, we're going to talk about it all. We're talking about documentaries and if we're talking about docs, even in this era of incredible gluts, there's one gentleman we have to talk about and that is Ken Burns. He has made more than 40 documentaries. He's done jazz, which is the first one that I saw, baseball, the Civil War, country music and so many other subjects. This month, he's got a new one out, a six part, 12 hour opus called the American Revolution. Here to talk about Ken Burns and the wide, wide world of docs, I've got two of my wonderful colleagues. Alyssa Wilkinson is a movie critic at the time. She writes our documentary lens column about new documentaries. Hello Alyssa. Hello. And James Pano-Wazek is our chief TV critic. He needs no introduction. He has reviewed the American Revolution for us. Hello Jim. Good day to you, sir. Good day. Well, let's start with the American Revolution. It's a great place to start. America started there. Why not us? This one is directed by Burns as well as his co-director Sarah Botsdene and David Schmidt. Jim, tell us about this new one. So the American Revolution is sort of what you would expect from your experience of Ken Burns, the celebrity guest voices, the sort of assembled roster of historians commenting on the historical events and their context, all the tricks he's developed to bring history to life, make it more kinetic, make it more auditory. But it is also, you know, I would say not just the version of the American Revolution that you learned in grade school, depending when you went to grade school. Right up front, you were sort of set at the beginning of the stirrings of revolution. From a small spark kindled in America, a flame has arisen not to be extinguished. The narrative also turns to the Iroquois Confederacy, which was a democratic governance arrangement among Native American groups that predated the American Revolution by centuries. We know our lands are now become more valuable. The white people think we do not know their value, but we are sensible that the land is everlasting. So it makes clear that this is going to be a story of all the Americans, colonists, loyalists, yes, but also Native Americans, also enslaved Americans. To that extent, I think it is a broadening of the story. And at 12 hours, he's got a lot of space to broaden the story. I would say that it's not one of his most surprising documentaries in terms of departing from his style, but with the 250th anniversary of America's independence coming up and a lot of culture wars going on over America's history and how it's told and what people should and shouldn't say about it. There were certainly things that surprised me. Things like what are the takeaways that I got from it was George Washington. Great American figure, not necessarily a great general in terms of winning a lot of battles. Well, if you remember the musical Hamilton, I think there is a line that he says there about having lost his first battle or something of that sort. Yeah, you know, I need it wrapped at me a few times before I really retain it. I'm not going to do that here. Alyssa, what's your relationship to the work of Mr. Ken Byrds? So I wasn't a big TV watcher as a kid, but I was a big PBS TV watcher as a kid. And my main memory of watching PBS as a kid is watching Ken Byrds documentaries during pledge drives. I don't know which ones they were looking at the dates. I'm thinking it was possibly the Civil War or maybe the Congress, although I think I also was watching the shakers. I think they just used to run them during pledge drives. I'm just like blurring in your mind. They're just, you know, a lot of photos being panned across and like experts and people being interviewed. So it's sort of a blur of history. But I assume that's sort of where I got my idea of what a documentary was in the early part of my of my life. And also I was homeschooled from the sixth grade onwards, which means that, you know, that was a big part of my history understanding was this is, you know, these photographs, the experts, the first hand accounts. That was really what I understood a documentary to be for a long stretch of my youth. Did you learn a lot about the three tenors from these pledge drives? I did. From River Dance? The three tenors. River Dance. Yeah, you know, I don't know. I was kind of a pledge drive kid, I guess. How many tote bags was your family have? Oh, we didn't never donate it. I just watched the pledge drive. I don't ate now. I don't eat now. You're giving back. You're giving back to your war. It sucked all this information out of PBS. I never gave it. Look, I have so many tote bags now. You don't even know. I think we all do. Yes. I'd love to hear more about this perception in your mind of what you thought a documentary was, what it should be, how it should feel. We're going to talk a little bit more about things that subvert that form. But what did young Alissa understand a documentary to be? Yeah. I think like a lot of people, we think of documentaries as a information giving vehicle. It's sort of like a visual magazine article or a visual newspaper article. It's sort of like a visual podcast, is how I start to think about it. Exactly. Look at all this information being delivered to me. And in fact, Burns often has a book. In fact, I think there's a book that is with you in the middle of the book. There is. We just reviewed it at the book. That's right. So there's like a book that goes with the documentary. They go hand in hand in their information delivery vehicles. And a lot of us, I think, get that idea because we then, when we're kids, we watch those documentaries in our history classes. Yeah. When our teachers just can't deal with us anymore or for whatever reason, right? But it's a good way to learn about history. Certainly, we get the visual images and the ideas. And we get these history clips also to understand what did the civil rights movement look like? It's more exciting than just reading about it in a book. I remember the feel of being in a way and being part of something bigger than yourself. And that's a very great feel. Jim, what would you say the reputation of Ken Burns is or the perception? And do you think that reputation or perception is earned or do his documentaries sort of subvert this very basic idea of what Ken Burns is? Well, I was not always early in my TV critic career and even before then, a huge Ken Burns fan. I think I had the perception that maybe a lot of people have that his stuff was very earnest and worthy, but very sort of middle of the road, that it was making it eloquent, well-produced case for things that people already agree on, right? Like War is Hell, you know, a good, exactly. We love baseball. And there is that. You know, there is a reason that this sort of thing is broadly appealing and is pledge drive gold. But I've also come to see what he does as kind of more pointed and radical over the years than I initially perceived it being, which I think partly is my just growing up and seeing more in it. And partly is maybe a change in the times. What he is trying to do is sort of create a canon of American history. You know, whatever we think about the present, we agree, you know, this stuff happened in the past and it happened for, you know, probably these reasons and this is where we came from. And that is, you know, that it's gotten increasingly contentious over times. I also think that a lot of his documentaries, they're really about more than the subject. And to me, this is the thing that I come to documentaries for. Like, you know, I'm not just trying to get like a Wikipedia download of information. I want you to be a take and idea. His National Parks documentary, I remember writing about when it came out somewhere, it was like around the beginning of the Obama administration. And I think each American can look into their own hearts and tell you, this is my National Park. And it might be the greatest. You know, and the idea was like, you know, the National Parks were like America's greatest idea and we preserved this land. And you know, but it was also about an idea that was very much currently being debated at the time, which is, do we need government to do things collectively that the private sector is never going to do? You know, and it doesn't come out and say that, but it is engaging with ideas. All this stuff is engaging with ideas that are, you know, current and timeless, wonderful stone, arch that says, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people. It doesn't say for the benefit and enjoyment of some of the people or a few of the people, it says all of the people. And for me, that meant democracy and for me, that meant I was welcome. And I stepped outside. And I think to try to do that to everyone, as opposed to your own personal amen corner, is really kind of like, that's metal. You know, it's like a very like radical thing to do now. And it's interesting that, you know, he's so inextricable from PBS to, you know, you think of PBS, you think of Ken Burns, basically. Yeah. Because there's other filmmakers, I'm thinking of Frederick Weisman, who've tried to take on institutions throughout their long, long, long career and Fred Weisman's been made 50 movies at this point, but they're not airing on every public television station in the country, which is significant at this moment in history, obviously, with public funding getting cut and all of those things. But I think Ken Burns, doing what he does on public TV, those two things can't be taken apart from one another. And it's kind of an embodiment of the idea of public TV, which again, you know, I think just with the passage of time, to me, it seems more radical and quaint. So Ken Burns, Frederick Weisman, Elissa, who you just referenced, these are familiar names. They've been around for a very long time. But we have had this explosion in documentaries and so much so, Elissa, that you now write a weekly column about documentaries that tries to help people navigate the sea of work this out there. Yeah, I mean, I write about at least a documentary a week for the paper. And I see more than that. I go to a lot of documentary festivals and try to see as many as I can. There's one happening right now in New York. There is one happening right now in New York, Doc NYC, and there's a bunch more around the country all year long. And it's, you know, it's really interesting because there's been a lot of ebbs and flows even over the last 10 years. Documentaries are really affected by where the money is. I mean, that's true of films generally, but because there's not kind of the same star power, it's often driven by, you know, where the platforms are, what the stories are that are being told. And right now, the industry is really struggling. There's not a lot of money for documentaries unless they fall into a couple of different categories, one of which is cults, one of which is true crimes. One is sort of the reputation, burnishing celebrity marketing documentary where the celebrity is the executive producer of the documentary. And those are the kinds of films that get made. And then a lot of other filmmakers want to make other kinds of films. They want to tell other kinds of stories. One thing about really, I would call quote unquote important documentaries, the ones that are telling stories that can actually change things in the world. They take a lot of time. I wrote about one documentary recently called the Alabama Solution that uses footage shot by prisoners inside the Alabama prison system. The Alabama Department of Correction, the ADLC, they don't want the public to see the conditions they get. You know, you can't just walk in and shoot that in two weeks. You have to have years of footage. That kind of thing is hard to convince funders that it's worth doing. So let's talk about documentary subgenres, what's getting made a lot right now. As you mentioned, you cannot talk about documentaries without talking about true crime. I was TV editor here at the Times in 2015 when it feels like a lot of this really started to pop. The beginning of that year, you had HBO's The Jinks. That was the diverse for it. Obviously, they're looking for body parts, looking for something, can be used as evidence. And then at the end of 2015, Netflix is making a murder came out. If the county did something or whatever and trying to plan evidence on me or something, I don't know. And that seemed to sort of spark something or set something off. Jim, do you have a lot to answer for? Do you have to deal with true crime sort of material? Is it a TV critic here? I mean, to some extent, there's just so much television now that there has to be a bar for me to pay attention to it. I was thinking about the question, am I into true crime documentary? And I feel that's like saying, do I like cop shows? While I like the wire, I like Happy Valley. I like something that has a voice and ideas and is saying something beyond what happened or just like, look at these people. And there is certainly true crime that's thoughtful and does that. The yogurt shop murders earlier this summer on when HBO was. I don't know that the city of Austin has ever been the same since the yogurt shop murders. I mean, that was a loss of innocence for this town for sure. You wouldn't think it would be thoughtful from the name, but it actually was a, yeah. It was really less about giving you the lurid details behind a crime. And it was much more about how our society reacts to shocking crimes and, you know, very much in a meta way about the same impulse that drives the Godzilla and true crime documentary podcast, et cetera, that we see out there now. So that's interesting to me. That's an idea that's something I can do something with. It's interesting that true crime has gone so far down the path that there's actually a bunch of projects this year that, including that one, that have like kind of come back around and are commenting on it. Like the perfect neighbor is one of the highest or most watched movies on Netflix. One is kind of a comment on true crime in addition to being a true crime documentary. There's an upcoming film called the Zodiac Killer Project that's sort of a satirical film about how I would have made the Zodiac Killer true crime movie if I could have. Film Predators is also about the Ticaccia Predator show. And then there was another HBO show a couple years ago, Mind Over Murder, which was also kind of an unpacking of the genre. So it's sort of like we know the tropes of true crime so well that we can watch shows about true crime and understand what they are because we know what they are. Yeah. Yeah. You know, there's been a true crime boom in documentary filmmaking, certainly in podcasts. But if we go back even farther than that, it feels like there's a giant category that we all have watched. Maybe we watch with our family members over the holidays, but we never really talk about which is the nature documentary. If there's something that maybe is more sort of anodine than a history documentary, it's a nature documentary. But now we have reached the stage where we have the sickest cameras ever invented and you can just go places you never were able to go to before. Yeah. And probably like, certainly for me, like my first experience of documentary was that we get to watch a movie day in school. There would be something where I didn't know like an otter is trying to escape from a wolf and it has a voice. You know, there's like, you know, really like Disney type documentaries. I will admit in the right mood to being a sucker for this sort of thing like the technology and just the ability to capture rare moments is stunning nowadays. And also, and I don't mean this disparagingly, like they can be sort of screen savoury for me in the best way. And voyeuristic too. I could never watch this otherwise. Yes. Can one be voyeuristic toward like penguins? I guess you can. I totally deserve their price. I guess not. Before going to see to fatten up for courtship. Others are already courting, parading back and forth with a special ritualized walk. I mean, the thing that I find funny is that there are so many iterations in a lot of these, these series and productions that it becomes like a challenge of classification. It's sort of, you know, this one is organized by continent. This one's going to be by biosphere. This one's going to be by, you know, this is about the forest. This is about the oceans. You can't just say, you know, a bunch of cool nature crap, volume 50. There needs to be some sort of taxonomic principle that says this is a different, but we all know we just want to watch a bunch of cool nature crap. Another big category. And I say this is someone who is not a person who watches sports generally, but is the sports documentary. Yeah. You know, the 30 for 30 series, which was the, the ESPN series feels like one of the big touchstones of TV documentaries over the past decade plus. I just think you remember the officials threatening to throw a flag on us if we did not shake your opponent's hand. Some of the language that was said there, the coin toss, it was just not right. You have all of those and then you sort of peak the first year of the pandemic with the last dance. Yes. Michael Jordan's only player that could ever turn it on and off and he never freaking turn it off. It was a very odd experience. Maybe the both of you remember this March, 2020 was Tiger King, a genuine sensation on Netflix. And then the month later, the last dance premiered. Yes. And it felt like documentaries sort of ruled those first few months for me at least of the pandemic. I'm so true. Yeah. And they, those two could not be more different as watching experiences. Absolutely. Even though it was very watching Michael Jordan just kind of sit there in the last dance and talk was almost an uncanny experience for me. I remember watching those games. Oh, yeah. Totally. Like not a sports guy at all. But you know, in the 90s, you could not not know about the Chicago Bulls. And you know, it's kind of, you know, is it partly that this is one of our few remaining areas of mass culture, you know, thing that all kinds of people know about. Yes. Well, also I have as a not a huge sports person myself, but the raw material of sports is so cool to see how documentarians shape it into different kinds of stories. During, I think the last Olympics, I went on the criterion channel and realized they had the full collection of all of the Olympic documentaries. Incredible. And some of them are made by some of the greatest documentarians of our time. Yeah. I mean, I very much recommend watching them. And you get to see them grappling with like actually the moment and what the Olympics are supposed to say at that moment, sort of the message of the Olympics at that moment, which is, gets pretty dark in some moments of the Olympics, you know, especially right around World War II in particular. The for victory. Victory not in war, not in wealth, not in tyranny. Not in sportsmanship and in peace. I wrote recently, I think last year actually, about a movie called Copa 71, which pulled footage from this World Cup events. That's a massive stadium. That's a men's football match. Where a women's soccer tournament took place, it's women's football. Not. And it was sort of like the footage was buried because they were so mad that this event had taken place and nobody knew it had happened. And so it was brought back out and made into this documentary. Why didn't they know about this? So you see like all these interesting types of stories, the political stories are like stories about gender, stories about the potential of the human spirit or also the sort of dark side of that, able to be told out of the raw material of sports. I really, I think that's part of why they make for such interesting documentaries. Yeah. I know that this had its critics, but I remember, and this is more series than sort of the thing that you're talking about, but I was very captivated by cheer when that was on Netflix a few years back. I just didn't have a heart. I just didn't care about anything or anyone. And without cheerleading, I would have not made it. It had been over for me. In the same way, well, why do I like watching Friday night lights? Yeah. You know, it's because it's about people and wanting things and you know a certain culture and it's about, you know, what people will do to get the things that they want. Last chance you, I also felt the same way. Great show about just, you know, what will you do to get to where you need to be when you have no other options? I sit in the bed and I think like, okay, I'm playing football for him, but I'm also missing him growing up. But if I get to the NFL, I'll be able to give him whatever I want, whatever he has for. All right. We've talked about a lot. I think it's time for break. And when we come back, we are going to have some very hardy recommendations for documentaries that our listeners might enjoy. I'm Robin and I am excited to open my cross-play app. I'm challenging John, my colleague at the New York Times. Robin played the word grunge, which has a G, which is four points. She got that triple word multiplier. I'm going to take facts and make it faxes for 30 points. I might just take another two letter word here with low, gets me at 23. I think this will put me back in the lead if my maths are mapping. I like to play it more from Mr. J. J. J. point of view and see where I can block the other player from scoring high. I'm pretty competitive. It's fun to beat friends and co-workers and also get to learn new words. Cross-play. The first two player word game from New York Times games. Download it for free today. I think he thinks he has us in the bag, but I'm not so sure. OK, Jim and Alyssa, I'm going to ask you to recommend some documentaries, both new and old, that you think listeners should watch. Jim, let's start with you. Show I really loved from earlier this year was Peewee S himself. Hi kids, guess what? I'm having a party and you're invited. I think it just was a film about Paul Rubens slash Peewee Herman, the late great children's performer and artist who cooperated with the movie and didn't. Do you know that? I don't know. Yeah. You would know that. You would see. You would get to see him. He's interviewed for it gave access to much of his materials. Also throughout the documentary and his interviews is very ambivalent about the idea of how much he wants to reveal about himself and how much control he can have and cannot have. Go ahead. I'm ready. I'm ready. You had conceived of a whole arsenal of fully developed characters before Peewee, right? Did I? It ends up being to me not just a fascinating portrait of like an artist who I just think can't be rated highly enough in pop culture, but also about the effects of creating and life living under a persona and a very much about the documentary process itself and what it can tell you and what it can't tell you. I kept who I was a secret for a really long time and that served me very well as I wanted it to and then it didn't. That is a great recommendation I've wanted to watch that for a while. I was going to watch it this weekend. I didn't get to it. You can find it on HBO Max or the Max Plus or whatever they call themselves now. Whatever they are by the time this airs. Alyssa, give us one. I'm going to start with a documentary from last year called the Remarkable Life of Ebelin. Our deepest sorrow lay in the fact that he would never experience friendships, love. This is a good example of how documentaries can be totally up to the point of the reality unlike anything that you think a documentary can be. It's about a young man who had a degenerative disease and passed away when he was in his early 20s and after he died, his parents went into his blog to post something about his passing and started getting emails from all these people. He was an incurable romantic. They kept talking about how their son had meant so much to them and how he had changed their lives. They didn't understand because their son had been literally confined to a wheelchair. It hadn't left the house in years and years. He would listen. He would remember back then that he was there for me. I could also talk to him about the stupid things. And come to find out he had been part of this guilt on World of Warcraft? Oh, I've heard about this one. Yeah, and so they went in and got hundreds of thousands of pages of logs from World of Warcraft which keeps the chat logs and got animators and recreated basically all of these scenarios. And then he just wrote back, this is too emotional for me. And I was like, well, you need to be emotional as well from time to time. Then you know you have met it to people. I mean, it sounds corny when I say that but it is the most amazing documentary that I saw I think last year entirely. So I highly, highly recommend it, not just for seeing what a documentary can be but also because it's incredibly moving about how we connect with one another. It's just it's really quite moving. So the remarkable life of Ebelin, IBE, LIN, it's streaming on Netflix. Jim, let's go back to you. Yeah, so you may not have heard it but Saturday night live had a 50th anniversary. What are you kidding? Why didn't they say anything about that? That was this year. Well, it was this year and last year. And last year and it's going to be next year. SNL loves having a birthday and it celebrates it for like five years. And the one good thing to come out of this one was a feeling, make sure I get this right. Ladies and gentlemen, 50 years of SNL music. Ladies and gentlemen, New York. Jolt of electricity. Iconic. Musical history. Game day. They turned over SNL's, you know, entire library of musical guests to Quest Love. And now here's Prince. I was there when Prince came on the very first time and he only got one song he's saying part of it. He is a, he's an excellent documentarian and musician obviously and his filmmaking is so musical. It's just it's percussive. It's, you know, he knows just when to cut. I remember at the end he's saying it, I'm not going to fight no more. Do his make down and walk off the stage. Gonna have to fight. I don't dare. We don't want to fight no more. Obviously, there's a lot as with all these things. Just a lot of, you know, remember when in the Stale Geno I remember seeing that performance this that, you know, Shenato Conner. I was going to stow a little, but you know, it's also just, it's like a cultural history of the last 50 years that you can dance to. Lazy gentlemen, you are so lucky tonight. Charlie XCX. Tayman Paula. The Wayne. Justin Bieber. Brianna. That's, that's still on Peacock and highly recommend. Excellent recommendation. Alyssa. Um, I want to recommend Kirsten Johnson's documentary camera person from 2016, which I believe is streaming on HBO Max. Entertainment is, is okay, but journalism is, need permission and film that's cinema. Some movie. Yeah. I have documentary in front, who would say there's kind of before camera person and after camera person in documentary world. Um, Kirsten Johnson is a cinematographer who shot like citizen for Fahrenheit 9-11, just some of the great documentaries. Um, but for this film, which she describes as kind of a memoir, um, she went back and got b-roll essentially, like kind of all the stuff on the cutting room floor and put together a memoir of seeing. So it's kind of stuff that she saw while shooting these. We never go to our own trauma. We are just putting things inside up. By thinking this is something what we need to do and it's a work. Um, and it's all footage that sort of describes what it is to watch all these things happen while you're shooting these films because she's shot in war zones. She's shot with sexual assault victims. She's shot obviously, you know, very funny moments. She's shot with Jacques Derrida. So you, you get kind of all the funniest. Yeah, I mean, a last riot that guy. Um, and so what you end up getting is a film about the ethics of seeing and the act of seeing. Um, and what it means to look at things, what it means to look at people, what it means to look through a camera at people and to ask people to do that as they're chronicling, you know, the world's real kind of horrors and also beauty and all of those things. So it's really, it's a stunner. It's a, it was a, as the kids like to say, it was a game changer. In the world of documentary, um, camera person, it's on, um, HBO max or whatever, whatever it's called today. Jim, one more for you, please. Okay. So I want to recommend, um, we've been talking about a lot of recent stuff. I want to recommend that you watch an American family, which is the, uh, television documentary for seven months from May 30th, 1971 to January 1st, 1972. The family was filmed as they went about their daily routine. It was, it was a PBS series, er, 1973 that was a, you know, raw cinema veritate look at, we're just going to, we're going to take cameras and we are going to shadow and, you know, California, American family living, I believe it was Santa Barbara and just see what their lives are like without commentary. If you, uh, you, you may need to go to a doctor tomorrow. Yeah. But it's just mainly this baking, I hate doctors and it's mostly, uh, just, just put a cold cloth on your head. Uh-huh. And you don't have any aspirin. You may not believe it now ended up being like a tremendous hit and sensation and controversy at the time because it ended up capturing a great deal of dysfunction and the dissolution of a marriage and the, the coming out of, of a son. Um, and it is both a cultural landmark of just, just kind of, just the 70s, like it is just the most 70s thing that ever 70s. Um, you know, and is just a landmark of television, you know, in the sense that, um, you know, it was a big influence. For instance, on the early seasons of the real world when that was being created, which in turn influenced 50% of the reality TV that you're, you're watching today. Um, now here's the situation. Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, the series is not widely available in streaming. I'm not, you know, suggesting that you do this, but, you know, if someone were to go to YouTube and type in a search, one might find uploaded at least partial versions of many of the episodes. Um, and it's fascinating and it's, it's a, you know, landmark piece of American culture that I, I wish more people had the opportunity to see. And look right here. I'm not seeing that we let such, you know, a super average ordinary life. But, but you went into your room one year and you didn't come out for about two more years, except at night when you lurched out the, you know, release the American family tapes. Please, Alyssa, classic. We're going to give you one more. Um, well, then the one I want to talk about is look into my eyes also from last year, directed by Lana Wilson. And she's like, I'm a grandma. I see her. That doesn't surprise me. Okay. Because she's like party and pulling up a chair. She's like, okay, so let's have a discussion. She's like, let's chat. It's about psychics, um, sort of. Okay. So Lana, um, reached out to seven different psychics in New York City and asked if she could film readings that they conducted with clients. And so you basically are in the room with them as they're conducting readings and you're watching them. I feel like your birth mother still thinks about you, but it's like a, and the movie is not there to credit or discredit them. You're just there. And then, uh, in the course of the movie, they talk to her about what they think is going on. I kind of fall back to is I really feel like I have this presence and this energy and the spirit with me. And I hope that I'm channeling something outside of me. There. And one of them's a pet psychic. Like the first month, I diagnosed a UTI in a cat. Um, it's a movie putting you in the room. And it's just asking you to say, what's happening or it or maybe not ask what's happening, but just to be there. And not that I thought I could really do this either, but I was hearing such great feedback. And it was a way I thought out of my situation, which it was in, and I don't know. It is not a movie that really gives you any preconceptions about what's happening. And that's so hard to find in the documentary world. I think that we normally walk into a documentary with a lot of like, this is the angle. It's just very open ended. It's very emotionally intimate. It's actually quite beautiful. So yeah, a 24 actually released it and it's streaming, I believe on HBO Max as well. As someone who has lived in New York for a while and has walked by many a storefront psychic, that actually sounds pretty fascinating. And I think I want to check it out at some point. Um, I want to toss a recommendation out of my own. If that's okay here, it's one of my favorite movies of all time, which is weird again, because not a sports guy, but it is a documentary from 1996 called When We Were Kings. Oh yeah. Fast last night I cut the light off my bedroom, hit the switch, was in the bed for the room was dark. It's a documentary directed by Leon Gast. It's about the rumble in the jungle, the 1974 fight in Zaire between George Foreman and Muhammad Ali. It features some of the greatest talking heads I've ever seen, primarily Norman Mailer. Most dictators are unbelievably ugly or plain, Franco Hitler. And George Plimpton, the failure she had said that a woman with trembling hands would somehow get to Foreman, a succubus. And that impressed me enormously. And George Plimpton is wearing a seer sucker suit the entire time. Amazing. Talking about Muhammad Ali, the phenomenon, you know witnessing him writing about him and being there for the rumble in the jungle. Spike Lee is one of the talking heads. Muhammad Ali is one of the greatest shit talkers of all time, right? So having access to all of his mockery of George Foreman and the lead up to the fight. Yeah, when I get to Africa, we're going to get it on because we don't get alone. I don't like him. He talks too much. And then it's intercut with footage from the Zaire 74 music festival, which was this music festival that was organized to happen at the same time of their performances by BB King and James Brown and a bunch of other people. It's just, it is fascinating. I've watched it several times, which is not something I feel like people do normally with documentaries. It's fantastic. I still remember seeing that the scene where you know, Ali's like he's training and locals are like chanting from Ali Ali, Ali, Boma, yes. Yes, yes. I'm trying to psych myself up for something now. I did still. I mean, killing. I think Norman Mailer saying Ali Bumae over and over again has been stuck in my mind for about 15 years. The world of documentary and of nonfiction filmmaking is so vast and there's so many things. Obviously listeners that we have not had time to mention, concert documentaries as a genre, a seven up films, political documentaries like, like Fahrenheit, 9-11, the two documentaries that were on our 100 best movie list of the 21st century, which the Dleaners and I and the act of killing. We could just talk forever about the stuff, but we cannot. We're going to have a list of all the documentaries that Jim and Alyssa and myself talked about in the show notes. So please look at those. And when we come back, we're going to end this week as we end every week with a little game. Okay, Alyssa, Jim, it is game time on a scale of one to 10, one being pooped, cruise Tedby Kedberg. How excited are you? Six, 15. Okay. Our game today is in three rounds, buzz in when you know the answer, winner will get a point, hands on buzzers, please, hands on left-out buzzers. Here we go. Round one, which we call Burns, Baby Burns. The answers to all of these questions in this round will be the subjects of documentaries by Ken Burns. Here we go. This is a question to the work for which he is best known. This 19th century icon was a newspaper reporter, a steamboat pilot, and the inventor of the board game, Memory Builder. J.P. Mark Twain? Mark Twain, that is correct. Mark Twain, 2002 film. In 1884, PT Barnum marched 21 elephants, including his most famous elephant, Jembo, to cross this structure to prove its stability to an anxious public. Alyssa. Brooklyn Bridge. The Brooklyn Bridge, correct, 1981 film, Ken Burns's directorial debut. The first of these federally protected areas was created in Wyoming in 1872, the most recent one in West Virginia in 2020. I buzzed it and I buzzed it too fast. I think you paused a little too much, but I'm not going to spoil by myself. Cove down the two of you. I went with a setup. Jembo, Panoazza. No, no, no, no, no, listen. I was in too early. We live in a society. Alyssa. We do. The National Park. National Park, that is correct. This athlete released a comedy album called I Am the Greatest, six months before becoming a world champion and changing his name. Jim. I'm Muhammad Ali. Muhammad Ali. So let's do that one. Subject of 820. The guys are being too nice to each other. Stop it. I'm going to stop it here. Thomas Jefferson believed that these two explorers, my confront, woolly mammoths, mouse speaking natives and volcanoes on their journey west to the Pacific Ocean. Jim. Lewis and Clark. Lewis and Clark. Lewis and Clark, the journey of the Corps of Discovery in 1985. That was Round One. We are headed now into Round Two, which is called Netflix and Kill. I'll give you the title. I will give you the title of a film. You tell me if it's an Academy Award nominated documentary or a Netflix true crime documentary. Here we go. QD in the Boxer. Alyssa. Academy Award nominated documentary. Oscar nominee 2013 about the marriage of Japanese artists, Noriko Shinhara and Usho. The betrayal. Jim. Netflix. This is an Oscar nominated documentary about a lay-ocean immigrant living in New York City. Who killed Vincent Chinn? Jim. Oscar. Oscar nominated documentary. Manson. Alyssa. Netflix. This is an Oscar nominated film from 1972. No, you're confusing it with chaos, the Manson murders. What I wrote about. Which is a Netflix documentary. Next, The Hatchet-Wielding Hitchhiker. That's not real. Someone buzzing in. I'm not buzzing in on this one. Alyssa. It's not real. It is real. It is a 2023 Netflix documentary about the rise and fall of Internet celebrity turn convicted murderer. Kai. The Hatchet-Wielding Hitchhiker. Are you? Okay. Well, I object. Round three. I object. No objections will be noted. Round three. Final round. Raise your voice. We are calling it. I am going to play you a clip of the narration from a documentary. You name the narrator. You get a bonus point. If you can tell me what documentary they are narrating. Oh boy. From now on, the couple has but a single goal. Keeping their egg alive. Alyssa. That is Morgan Freeman and it is the March of the Penguins. Correct. You got both rights. Perfection belonged to the bears. Once in a while, Treadwell came face to face with the harsh reality of wild nature. Alyssa. Alyssa. It is, I mean, it is for an a Herzog and it is, oh my god, grizzly man. Grizzly man by Verna Herzog. Correct. All right, you are doing great. Next. Although over a hundred million people live on America's East Coast. This is also where you find 200,000 square miles. I mean, it's Tom Hanks. It is Tom Hanks. Do you know the name of the film? I certainly do doubt. Okay, that is called the Americas. Oh, yes. One of those taxonomical nature shows. Okay, next celebrity narrator. By the late 1930s, movie going had become an essential part of American culture. More than half the adult population went to the movies. Well, it's Meryl Streep. It is Meryl Streep. I don't remember the name of this. This is the Netflix documentary five came back about American filmmakers who also went to World War Two. Next celebrity narrator. He said all our modes of transportation boats, trains, planes, cars, where we produce our food, where we build our cities, almost everything we do releases carbon dioxide, CO2. Jim. It's Leo de Caprio. It is Leonardo Caprio. Something, something, climate. Pretty close. Pretty close. Pretty close. This is a film called Before the Flood. I think it was called something something climate. Something something climate. Yeah, yeah. Ten points to Jim. Okay. Fredrik Dumas and I, after all this time, still think it is a privilege to go down again and live for a while inside the sea. Jim. Jocousto. Jocousto. Jocousto. Jocousto. Jocousto. I guess. Do you have any idea what the day of this film is? I do not. Neither. I would not have been able to guess this one. The film is called The Silent World. I could not name a single Jocousto movie, but we can all name Jocousto. Okay. That was the final question. We are going to tally up the score here. Holy cow. Alyssa. Hold it out. I think this is the closest score we've ever had. You won by one point. Wow. Wow. Okay. Next time don't make jokes about something something. It's not a matter if you'd guess correctly. We would have gone to some death round. Amazing. You should have called it that. You win something. It's over here. Okay. We call it the guild. I'm aware. It is a cheap mass purchase small golden trophy with my face on it. Oh my God. Amazing. It's going right on my desk. Congratulations. It looks exactly like the spelling bee trophy I got in second grade. Thank you. I'm honored. It's just it's I'm honored. I don't think the academy. Yes. It is. Put some fireball in there. I will. I am honored that the two of you came on to talk documentaries. What a great conversation. Alyssa. Thank you. Jim. Thanks so much. I enjoyed this and that is nonfiction. This episode was produced by Alex Barron who's also our quizmaster with help from Dalia Hadad and Luke Vanderplugue. It was edited by Wendy Dore and engineered by Sophia Landman. No music by Dan Powell, Marion Luzano, Alicia Bae Etube and Diane Long. Special thanks to Paul Assumin. Thanks for listening. See you next week.