Flashback Friday | #448: The Impending Population Collapse

It's all about the macro productions. Flashback Fridays here on Macroaggressions, taking you back to June 18th, 2024. The impending population collapse. If you want to turn some of your soon-to-be-worthless fiat currency into actual money, then check out my friend Tony Arterburn with Wise Wolf Gold and Silver. Set up a monthly buy with Wolfpack subscription as low as $50, or roll over your IRA and 401k into physical precious metals. You can even use your Bitcoin to make purchases. Go to macroaggressions.gold. Promo code macro for free silver. Now please enjoy the show. What does the goddamn line say, Tony? Please do not use gendered language. Then what? I'll be arrested, put in airport jail? Look, you're going completely sideways, man. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. How dare you? Mr. Speaker, the President of the United States. I'm Chris Hanson, Dave on NBC. Jack Marius, Tac Theratrix. Hi, I'm Scott. Jackson, Sacramento, he, him. Steven Seagal. Sex Offender Guard. I'm Keith Morrison. This is Mumbai. Good to be. I'm Rick James, bitch. Sorting through the lies. The hijacker's passport was found blocks from the World Trade Center crash site, if you can believe that. We cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. and uncovering the centuries-long plan for world domination. Learning about Cuba. Having some food. Let's talk about Chinese people. Have you ever been in a Turkish prison? Ha! Ha! Predator! Swingles. We're laughing. I have sent six of my Libyan missiles to blow up the serious hardware department. I think it would be more fun than jumping off a cliff with two German bisexuals. Oh, you English are so superior. aren't you? Thank you, comrade. And now, macroaggressions. That's what I'm calling. With your host. Buddy, I don't know who you are, but you're about to get chlamydia. Charlie Robinson. Hey, Whitey, where's your hat? You wouldn't drop the blame on Charlie and say it's all Charlie's fault. He was a retard. I get some goddamn diuretic. Welcome to Macroaggressions. I'm your host, Charlie Robinson. If you're watching us on Rockfin or Rumble or listening, wherever podcasts are served, thank you so much. We appreciate your support. If you want to connect with me, the website is macroaggressions.io. You can do that. Hey, listen, the new audio book for The Octopus of Global Control is available. You can get that on Audible, iTunes, Amazon, Spotify, and wherever they sell audio books, I guess. It gets syndicated out everywhere. So check it out. 23 hours, it's well worth your money. If you've got a long, I don't know, flight or a car ride or you're going to the gym or whatever, this will keep you going for quite a while. So check it out wherever audiobooks are available. Also, thanks to our sponsors. They make this show happen. Boy, I mean, EMP Shield just got themselves like the best advertisement you could get with the solar flares and all that stuff and coronal mass ejections and all this. Oh, God. I just kept thinking, I hope we don't need it. But if you do, it's there. EMPshield.com is the place to go. You can find out everything about the products that they are making. It will work on your home, your car, your motor home or boat if you've got one or a generator. It installs like a type 2 surge protector with just four wires. It's easy to install it yourself. They have installation videos on their own website. You can find them all over the place on YouTube as well. so if you're in the market empshield.com is the place to go to find uh all the information about it just read about it suits thing it'll protect against solar flares obviously emp strikes hopefully we don't have those lightning that's a realistic thing especially you know depending on your geography so better to be safe than sorry empshield.com is the place to go if you find something on your way out the discount code for that is macro and i keep going on and on and on about chemical-free body, but I will continue until everybody feels better because I feel great. It's part of my daily routine. Green 85 has been for four years. It looks weird, tastes pretty good, and make you feel a whole lot better. That is for sure. So have you made the decision that you're done feeling gross? You're done feeling lazy and lethargic and I don't know, maybe you've got extra pounds or whatnot. Chemical-free body is a great place to go. ChemicalFreeBody.com is the website. The discount code on your way out is MACRO. You've got Pat Miletic's Super Soldier Formula. You can get that. You can get the Detox Bundle. I've done that twice. It's a 90-day program. It is really easy. It's not going to take you any time to do it. It's just a decision of, you know, do you want to do it or not? So if you've made the decision to take your health into your own hands, then ChemicalFreeBody is a good place to do it. Discount code is macro. Well, I'll tell you, I've been all over like population as a topic for a while now, really for a couple of years. But lately, I'm seeing it everywhere. Maybe I'm seeing it because I'm writing about it. I don't know. But I see it everywhere. You hear Elon Musk comes out and talks about, oh, population's really low. We've got to have more kids. And he's got like, I don't know, nine kids or 10 kids or 50 kids. I don't however many kids he's got he's he's the only globalist that is talking about the dangers of population now it doesn't mean i trust him of course i'll be crystal clear about that but he is the only one that that seems to be to everyone else's is of the other variety too many people taking up space on our planet um and of course the media is is running cover for that you know So if you start with the understanding of what the goal is and then work your way backwards, everything makes way more sense. Here's the goal. They want everybody dead and off of their planet. Okay, how are you going to accomplish that? Well, we could do it a couple of ways. We could kill everyone with wars. They're definitely trying that. We can kill them with diseases that we make. We've been seeing that for a while. Our products will kill them. Yeah, we like that. Our vaccines will kill them. Or at the very least, just whittle them away so that they have no defense mechanisms to fight off anything. So, you know, if you if you if you start with the premise that they're trying to kill and thin the herd and then say, well, am I seeing any evidence to support this? Oh, I don't know. How about this headline? This is according to the Telegraph. I'm talking about the UK population collapse is, quote, good for the planet. Good for the planet is what they say. Hey, listen, the population collapse is good for the planet. It's bad for you. you know the population that has collapsed it's you know all those dead people that you were crying about and went to their funerals for you know your mom and your grandmother and all your friends you know all the sad for you but hey listen buck up it's good for the planet i mean that's what the telegraph said we had 605 479 live births in england and wales uh that was in 2023 and that was the lowest in 20 years 21 years since 2002 but it's good for the planet so and of course these people care about the planet you know when they're not setting off nuclear bombs and polluting the rivers and uh creating pathogens in labs and releasing that you know they they but they they they care about planet you're gonna have to trust them on that um did you know did you know that more than 50% of American women are childless at age 30. And that as a sort of a subset of that, like, by the way, that's fine if you want to wait until you're 30. I mean, my wife and I, we were both 39 when our daughter was born. That is statistically speaking, that is old. We old, right? And once you get above 35, well once you get to 35 you have a 15 chance of actually getting pregnant once you get to 40 that number drops to a five percent chance so one in 20 chance of getting pregnant if you want to at 40 years old so if you're waiting for something like that uh you know keep waiting so i said 50 percent of american women are childless at 30 63 percent of american men under 30 are unmarried so they're not really even heading that way so to you know roughly two-thirds of the guys are unmarried if they're in their 20s um probably not the worst plan you know i mean if you find someone you you know in your 20s that that you're compatible with good good luck to you but but again like you know in retrospect looking back i'm like where i was in my 20s versus where i was in my 30s it was a huge difference. So it's not exactly the worst thing in the world. You know, I mean, you don't want to go like randomly have a bunch of kids with any stranger that you meet in your 20s, obviously. But these are the stats and these are showing sort of a trajectory about where population could be going. And of course, you know, you never want to invest too much sort of credence and these people talking about their statistics because they're often wrong. But if we're just going to take them at their word that really two-thirds of American men are uninterested in being married in their 20s, well, then how many are interested in getting married in their 30s? Because things are changing. How many men are even capable of having kids given that they've spent their entire adult lives with a cell phone in their pocket next to their balls i mean that's a reasonable question right when are we going to do the studies on that to find how that emf radiation impacts your you know the region of your body in which you're carrying your phone i mean we've already seen the stat the studies for the women that are like that's i mean the you know the super classy women that stick their cell phones in their bras you know and they're like oh it's like four times more likely to get breast cancer in this one spot and everyone's like oh i wonder if it has anything to do with my phone well maybe it does i'm not saying for sure that it does i'd need to see the study but i remember reading it thinking well it's probably not the best thing right and then and then i keep my damn i got my cell phone in my i'm not trying to impregnate the world also so it's not as big of a deal for me but uh fellows If you want to have kids, you might need to reevaluate where you store your phone and think about something like that. But I'm not really too surprised that nobody wants to get married. And in this stat, it was men that are unmarried. But it takes two to tango. Well, I guess maybe not nowadays. We have a generation of woke retards that think that they're a fox or that they're two-spirit or pansexual. So I guess it doesn't necessarily take two to tango. Maybe 63% of American men under 30 are unmarried. But what if they transitioned into a cake? And now does that count? Are they counted? How is the accounting going for that when somebody decides in the middle of this study that they've changed their gender? Have you thought about that, people taking the study? Listen, regardless of what these people think that they are, whether they think that they're a furry or they think that they're two-spirit, which is a gender that doesn't actually exist. But and I know that because I talked to Lindsay Sharman, who who taught on an Indian reservation and they said, oh, yeah, two spirit is two spirit is what the Native Americans call transgenderism. She's like, no, they don't. She's like never heard of this. Nobody I know has ever heard of this. They're making stuff up. And sorry. Sorry. We haven't we haven't the Indians suffered enough. We have to make up genders that they're transitioning to when they're really not. for god's sake we put them in reservations and introduce them to vodka for we've done enough already but uh listen i mean regardless of what these people think they are or who they think they are what they think they are the one thing that they are not doing is they are not having kids they're not reproducing this is this and and frankly this might not be the worst thing for the gene pool but it isn't the best if you're trying to maintain population levels at a certain rate. And, you know, and part of it is has to do with this. There's also this there's this belief that, well, when I think, you know, when we think about having kids, it's always in the future. You know, it's not something they have to to to consider today. They always talk about it like, well, at some point I will. Once I make senior vice president, then I will. Once I get, you know once we own a house then i will once we get out of this crummy apartment where we don't have enough room then i once my wife gets you know once this once that once all these you know all these all this criteria out in the future um but it's always it's always in the future it reminds me of obama's campaign remember when he ran on a campaign of hope hope hope everybody hope and you go, I remember people saying, God, what a dumb campaign. I said, no, no, no. This is actually the most genius campaign ever because hope is always in the future and you never have to deliver on it. So as long as you have hope, then it's going to happen later. It's not going to happen today. So if you're somebody that's selling hope, you could sell hope forever because it never has to be delivered on because it's always by definition in the future. And this generation now, and of course i'm generalizing please understand that but the the generation that says you know i i'm not my parents gender i'm not my grandparents generation and i understand times were different and people maybe worked on the farms and they needed more help and there's a lot of things that go into that but but still the idea of like having kids in your 20s that's not happening having kids in your 30s now that's not happening and one of the things i want to get into this in this episode is how the corporations are playing into this because they're definitely feeding this narrative. They are conspiring with the people that they employ in order to push that date of having kids as far off into the future as humanly possible. And of course, I'm talking about the perks that these tech companies give their employees to freeze their eggs. And now you if you work for one of these major brands, you might have heard about this through your HR departments. You might have been informed that there are options for you if you are so inclined. But for for women that think that they want to hold out until they make senior vice president, then there's options for them. You can take your eggs and you can freeze them. and if you do that you can then theoretically i mean i guess scientifically too but i mean you could then go have kids later in you know when you're not focused on your career now whether or not you actually do that or it actually winds up working with your calendar or these eggs are viable all that stuff is to be determined of course i mean it's it's a huge gray area but but you're not going to be able to blame these employers for not giving you the option. See, here's their line of thinking. We've got these great employees and we need to retain them. We also need them to not go out of work for like months at a time. It would really, really help if the ladies that we have employed here don't just up and vanish for six months out of the year. You know, and go, well, you know, got pregnant and here's this thing and I get maternity leave and I'm out and there's nothing you can do about that. So the corporations have started financing family oh I don know They call it family planning Right What they really want you to do is kick the proverbial can or the egg down the road and and wait it out and wait for a while. Maybe things will change. Maybe, you know, maybe you'll never want to have kids, whatever. But we need you here on the, you know, at the factory, at the Google factory or the Apple corporate headquarters or wherever. We need you doing your job, which is the reason why Apple will offer you up to twenty thousand dollars for egg freezing. Did you know that? Have you have you explored this? Because I have. I went down the egg freezing rabbit hole. It's a weird one and it's everywhere. It's it is surprisingly normal. in the Bay Area. Now, most of these you know, I mean listen, a case can be made that most of these women can freeze their eggs for as long as they'd like. You know what I mean? If you still think that you're pansexual and you're freezing your eggs, like, I can't help you here. Maybe you'll work through it. Maybe it's a phase you're going through. Maybe you'll get into your 30s and go, what in the fuck was I talking about with all this like two-spirit non-binary shit that I was pushing. Yeah, I do want to have kids. Good thing I say I froze my eggs. Well, Facebook will also give you up to $20,000 to use towards your egg freezing. Google, in what apparently is an egg freezing arms race, has decided to up that to $75,000. I mean, listen, if that's the decision, you're like, I've got these great offers. I got a great offer from Apple and I got a great offer from Google. I'm gonna go Google. I'm gonna go Google. They're about 55,000 higher on the egg freezing. And you know how I love to freeze my eggs all the time. So they'll give you 75 K plus IV in vitro fertilization. Google has stepped up, man. Their their egg freezing game is, you know, is everybody knows. Everybody knows it's one of the best in the business. Yeah, Microsoft has a variable in this. They have egg slash sperm freezing up to $50,000. So what if you have both eggs and sperm? I'm just kidding. Everybody knows that those people are unemployed and shooting fentanyl in the tenderloin down in San Francisco. so microsoft will give you up to fifty thousand dollars for your egg and sperm freezing to be fair this is the only one that i found that uh that that offers sperm freezing i wonder what the sperm looks like from the guys working at microsoft just i'm just saying it's probably it's probably not the best it's all filled with mountain dew and god i don't know marvel comics um spotify spotify listen if you're having a hard time attracting top talent you might want to consider uh improving your egg freezing ten thousand dollars that's it shit man uh that's not that's not a ton i mean even starbucks is offering they they they have uh they've left it a little bit more amorphous they're just calling it fertility services which i assume means getting your husband pregnant at Starbucks so that he can get a job working there, serving you lattes all day. $25,000 towards fertility services plus $10,000 for prescription drugs. You're going to need them. You're going to need them trying to keep that shit together. Walmart also offers $20,000 for fertility services. i mean look okay so uh you know i'm i shit all over i mean i guess i suppose it's better than a lifetime free pass to planned parenthood right you know these these are groups that are looking to um you know maybe allow people to reproduce at a later time at a time that is more fitting for them so i guess if i'm if i'm shitting all over the depopulation people that i have to sort of recognize that at least these corporations are trying i don't think they're trying very hard though i don't think they really like the idea of you disappearing to uh to to go get your um eggs frozen and then you know i mean i don't think they like the idea of you taking time off to to actually have kids now right that's not something that they want so maybe split the difference and go fine fine you can have kids in your 70s right we'll just freeze the eggs for you. Don't worry. We've got this whole Googleplex over here. We're working on fertility. We're going to make it so that you can be a 75-year-old woman having a kid or a 75-year-old man. As we all know, men can get pregnant. If you don't believe that, you're a bigot. Let's move on to demographics of senior citizens that are 65 and older. This is where I wound up going down some of these statistical rabbit holes on demographics. And what you find is that we've got a real aging population, of course. So when our grandparents were being born, their grandparents were dying off. Depending on where you were geographically, you weren't living a real long life. I mean, anything like before the 1800s, the life expectancy was somewhere between 20 and 30 years. You weren't really expected to make it a long time. If you were some aristocrat that had access to fancy things like food, you might live a little bit longer. And if you weren't drinking out of the same water that you were, the stream that you were pissing in or whatever, I mean, you might not get the sort of diseases that everyone else had. But for the most part, you were lucky if you made it like past 30. That was considered a big deal. And times have changed, as we know, and people are starting to life spans are extending a little bit longer. And there's a variety of reasons for that. Some of it is improved sanitation. Some of it is improved health. Some of it is most definitely not vaccines, but they'll tell you that it's vaccines. But but a lot of it just things are getting better. Medical technology is getting better. the ability to feed people is getting easier to do. I would suggest that the quality of the food is poor, way less nutritious than it was before, but food itself, P-H-O-O-D, is actually getting out to people, whether it's real or fake food, that is to be determined. But there's plenty of reasons why people are living longer. And when you take a look at some of these demographics, These statistics that I get for all the demographics are going to be brought to you courtesy of our friends over at the United Nations, which I don't like, of course, but they are the group that gets down into the weeds in terms of population because they're so focused and depopulating. So they need to know what they're working with in order to sell the narrative of how we have to thin the herd and kill off all these useless seeders. So I take their numbers at their word, not because I trust the United Nations, but because this is it at the bare minimum. These are the numbers that they are working off of. So we'll use it as our baseline. It may be a little different. It may not. I don't know. But in the end, it doesn't matter because what you what you can do is you can see what what they believe these numbers to be and where they want to go. And we'll get into this towards the end. We'll sort of wrap this episode up talking about the low fertility industrial complex because it's a real thing. And there are groups out there that are actively trying to get those fertility numbers down as low as they can. They have no problem killing you once you're born. Extracting you for tax revenue as long as they can and then getting rid of you at the tail end of your life when you are worthless to them and no longer a productive member just to drain on society. They'd love for you to go away. In an ideal situation, they'd prefer for you to not even be born in the first place. Let's take a look at some of these numbers. In North America and Europe, this is how they grouped them. North America and Europe, back in 1980, there were 113 million people that are senior citizens, considered senior citizens, 65 years and older. 113 million of them back in 1980. As we stand right now, that number from 113 has roughly doubled. We're at 208 million senior citizens in North America as well as Europe. So the numbers doubled in 40 years. And I often think about Social Security situations like this. We have an insolvent Social Security system. We already know that. I find it not the least bit coincidental that the overwhelming push for vaccines, both shots and two boosters, was heavily targeted at the 65 and older population. Now, they will say, the media and the scientific community will say that was because this is a demographic that's at most risk. They're at most risk of collecting their Social Security payments. That's what they're at most risk of, of destroying and exposing the house of cards that the American welfare system is built on. That's what that's what they're really concerned about. They're not worried about these people living a long life. They hate these people. If you're 65 and older, you are draining society in their eyes. You are taking from them. You know, you're taking the social social. You're taking all the social security money, you know, that you paid into your entire life and finance. And you're the reason why there is money in here, too. They'll make you feel guilty. How dare you do that? How dare you actually collect on this thing that you paid for your entire life and were promised that you would collect on? So they would prefer if a lot of the older people that are able to collect on their Social Security just up and died. They really want that. And so when they see these numbers doubling, this is alarming for them. Now, it's going to grow again. They give you three sets of numbers here. They give you 1980, 113 million seniors, North America and Canada. Now, 208 million. 2050, that's 30 years from now, they've got it at 303 million. So we're going to add another 100 million 65 and older people to the demographic pool. They're going to transition. Transition, you say? They're going to become seniors at that point. I will be in this group at that point. And by the way, if you're thinking of starting a business, take a look at these demographic shifts. in-home nursing care, huge industry. You want to go out there. I mean, not that everybody can just go start one of those things, but you want to look at an industry that's growing, something like that. Let's move on. These numbers get almost parabolic when we come to Asia. So let's talk about Asia right now. Again, we're just talking about senior citizens. We'll get to everybody else in a minute, but we're just talking about old people. In 1980, in Asia, there were 109 million old people. Right now, that number has quadrupled to 424 million old people. By 2050, that number is going to more than double to 948 million senior citizens in Asia. That's close enough to me. I'm going to round up by about 50 million people here, but let's just call it an even billion. By 2050, a billion old people in Asia. Is that a good thing? I mean, now we start to get into, you know, health care. Like, how long do I just got back from Tokyo? How long do the Japanese live? They live a long time because they take good care of themselves. They're in good health. So they theoretically their life expectancy is higher. We'll talk about life expectancy too. But for something to go from 1980, for it to be 100 million people of senior age range, and then 70 years later, that number is almost 10x from like 100 million to damn near a billion. That's an unsustainable business model. What happens after that? What happens after they all die off? Then there's nobody there. Right. Moving on, let's move to Africa in the Middle East. So Africa in the Middle East back in the 1980s only had a very small percentage of the population that was senior citizens, about 21 million. Very small. You know, you don't in the 1980, you don't make it to 65 in Africa a lot. OK, it's that is winning. That is social security. Like you think, oh, you want to collect your social security? You made it to 65 in Botswana. No, listen, the fact that you're alive, that's the reward. Okay, that number tripled from 1980 till now. It's now at 65 million. And guess what? That number is going to triple again by 2050. It'll be at 198 million or roughly 200 million people of senior citizen age and higher just in the Middle East and Africa. So, again, you look at these numbers, just like Asia, it's going to go from 21 million to just about 200 million in 70 years. 10x. That's quite a bit, you know. So you have to make these calculations. Oh, geez. You know, I mean, Japan just said, fuck it. We're going to robots and vending machines. They already made that calculation. But they have a demographic problem. You know, I mean, they have a they have a admittedly have a demographic problem. They actually have forced retirement over there in some lines of work, especially in the corporate world. Because otherwise, these guys will just drop at their desks. They'll just work themselves until they literally die. It's a culture set up on that work as a reflection of your self-worth. And so without this job, who am I? And so in that line of thinking, you know, I mean, lucky that there are jobs in Tokyo and are in Japan and in general for for people to have as they get older. But what do you do in Africa when there are any jobs anyway? And then you and then your senior population 10 X's over 70 years. And now the next thing you know, you've got 200 million people mulling around Africa that are 65 and older. and and and what doing what getting supported by who so this is going to create some real problems here let's talk a little bit about life expectancy back to the united nations again they're the ones that provided this this figure this is 2022 so it's pretty fresh we're going to go we're going to change the um we're going to change the dates on this a little bit and and from from the last one. We're going to go 1950, 2000, 2050. Okay. So nice 50 year blocks for a hundred years. We're going to give you three numbers here. Life expectancy in North America in 1950, the life expectancy was 68 years old. Okay. At the millennium, the life expectancy to your 2000 went from 68 to 77. Not bad. You got nine years over those 50 years. They expect in the future from the year 2000 to the year 2050, that number will grow from 77 years old to 84. So now we're getting another seven years, right? So not bad if you think about it. 16 extra years over the course of from 1950 to 2050 that's that's quite a bit man you can get you can do a lot of living in uh in in in that time frame so how's it looking elsewhere well let's move on to europe europe back in 1950 you were you were probably going to die at 63 right that's the average uh that increased by a considerable amount 11 full years by the year 2000 got you up to 74 and then by 2050 you're going to get another 10 years be 84 not bad so it's so according to their predictions by the year 2050 both north america and europe will actually have the same life expectancy 84 years old so congratulations statistically speaking as long as you don get run over by a bulldozer you going to probably live a little bit longer than your parents and you definitely going to live longer than your grandparents Unless you take a bunch of vaccines and then you will not But this is sort of the trajectory that they've got us on. Okay, so again, now we're going to move to Asia. And the numbers in Asia are staggering, really. If you look at the difference over the course of 100, what 100 years makes, right? The difference between, I mean, there were entire centuries where nothing happened, you know, in this, in terms of life expectancy. It didn't go up, didn't go down, just kind of stayed the same. No real massive improvements. But if you lived in Asia in 1950, you were expected to live to be 42 years old. 1950. You know people that were born in 1950, right? Because it only puts them at 74 right now, right? So it's not like super old. So if you were in 1950 in Asia, the average life expectancy was 42. In 100 years from then, by 2050, that's going to almost double to 80. To go from 42, average life expectancy, 42, to go to 80, that is a tremendous improvement, right? So for the folks in Asia, you've got a lot to look forward to. But again, here's the thing. When you increase the life expectancy by almost double, that's the reason why you have these exponential rises in demographics of senior citizens. This is how you go from 109 million in 1980 to 948 million in 2015. This is how you wind up with a billion people that are 65 and older in the year 2050 is because in Asia, you're doubling the life expectancy. Normally, these people were cooked at 42. Now they're going to live to be 80. You have to plan for that. You have to plan for that from an infrastructure standpoint, housing, transportation, monetary system, jobs, all of that. These people plan to be around a little bit longer. Let's wrap up the life expectancy with Africa. If you lived in Africa back in 1950, your life expectancy was worse than Asia. It was 38. You were a target. You were going to die of starvation. You were going to die of poor nutrition. You were going to die of malaria, of drinking water, getting eaten by a leopard, getting run over by a charging elephant. There's all kinds of things that could get you in Africa. But they've made tremendous progress because in 100 years, by the year 20, well, okay. From 1950 just to the year 2000, that number jumped from 38 years to 53. So in just half a century, they increased that by 15 full years. That's a really, really amazing, impressive feat. but then in the next 50 years they have them scheduled to increase by the same amount by another 15 years right so they're going to go ultimately from an average age in africa average life expectancy in africa 1950 38 years old how many people out there are 38 years old you'd be dead in africa right statistically speaking they're going to go from 38 to 68 by 2050 so once again this explains the 10x uh in senior citizen demographic populations in effort to go from 21 million to almost 200 million this is the reason why everybody's living longer as chris rock says you know like you know they say that life is short but no life is long especially if you make the wrong decision so now that you know that life is long maybe make sure to plan accordingly i mean up until yeah i mean up until the mid it was really the mid 1800s the life expectancy was between 20 and 30 you know so you'd be dead you'd be dead if you were living in the in the 1700s you would have been dead in some um shootout you would have had to settle a dispute out into out in the out in front of the saloon moving on let's move on to india and china because they're a fascinating study in population structures because um india and look both of these are the two most populous countries in the world and the way they view their people is different very different i've talked to plenty of people that um i talked to a lady that i I knew a long time ago who grew up in China and she said, we just, it's just different for us. There's so many people like, cause she was explaining how like she was with her husband who's, who's an American and they were explaining how they just saw somebody get hit by a bus, right? A guy on a motorcycle just get hit by a bus. And they were just like, Oh my God, the husband was like mortified. Like, Holy shit. I can't believe I just saw it. And the wife was like, eh, you know, he was like, how can you be so like flippant about this? She's like, there's a lot of us, you know, like it's, it's fine. He was like, God damn. Like, is that how you really think? She's like, yeah. Like people, she said, you know, like people maybe like dragged him off the street, but it's like, boom, like traffic has got to keep flowing. So back to business as usual. And, and, you know, if that's the way you view your population as well, you know, there's more ants, there's always more ants. We can just get, you know, then you're going to make some decisions that are kind of heartless. And, and India has done that as well. And they, India's sex selective abortions have removed 16 million girls that would have been born. Right. So there is a preference in India to have boys over girls. And you can go in for an ultrasound and determine that you are about to have a girl and you can have it aborted. And in fact, in India, 16 million times that has specifically happened. so um that has a that plays a part in this right and as a as sort of a subset of that indy is now expressing an interest in going to to impose a two-child policy i don't know that they'll be able to actually make that go through i'm not as familiar with indian politics as i am american but that is at least on the drawing board to move to a two-child policy and india has 200 million more people that are under the age of 25 than china has think about that from a demographic standpoint so 200 million people is like two-thirds the population of the u.s okay and that's just the difference that india has in extra young people than china they still have they have a lot more than just 200 million but they have 200 million more than china so that's a formidable group of potential workers um which that may or may not be a good thing depends on how you want to maybe maybe the pivot is from china being the manufacturing warehouse uh of of the world to maybe india becomes that and you would have an advantage in terms of of having workers there not that it's going to matter because they're all going to be robots at this point anyway but both india and china were at an average of six kids per family back in 1970 both of them both india and china were on that same trajectory an average of six kids right Then Kissinger got into both countries and worked to bring those numbers way, way down, and he delivered. And who did he use to deliver on these promises? He used the United Nations, the World Health Organization, UNICEF, which is the United Nations Children's Education Fund, USAID, United States Agency for International Development, otherwise known as a regime change depopulation outfit, and also the UN Fund for Population Activities. And through this, they put in place coercive programs to reduce the population rate. And so let's talk a little bit about what happened with this. So in India, I mentioned six, the population rate in 1970 was six. That's a lot. Right. To put this in perspective, what you where you need a population rate to be in order to just maintain the current population is 2.1. That's the magic number that you need. Not to 2.1. so if you if you are running a a rate of anything above 2.1 you'll be adding to your population over time and anything underneath that you depending on how far underneath that and depending on whether it's women or men you will you will be on a trajectory towards uh being underpopulated so 1970 in india it's six 1980 it's five 1990 it's four 2000 it's 3.5 so in 30 years kissinger and his group were able to get that number in india i'm not talking about swaziland some some obscure country even i'm not talking about luxembourg i'm not talking about some country with a population of like 75 000 i'm talking about india they got the population down the population rate from six down to 3.5 30 years that is crazy but you ain't seen nothing yet let's talk about china's population rate i mentioned same as india 1970 they're running at six then they instituted the one child policy do you remember this one child policy in china it was uh i mean bill gates and henry kissinger must have had an erection lasting longer than four hours after once the one child policy got into place i swear uh so six in 1970 the policy goes into place three in 1980 two in 1990 and 1.5 in the year 2000 so i was talking about how india had done such a great job going from six to 3.5 in just 30 years china went from six to 1.5 in 30 years as well okay so you are talking about a very very hard push towards depopulation in china and india for that matter birth rate of muslims in india dropped from 4.5 in 1990 to 2.4 now they managed to target that hindus uh from 3.5 in 1990 to 1.9 now so they're making it they're they're going after specific uh religions and focusing on that you know taylor may making these uh depopulation messaging to uh you know to correlate with a religion you know god wants you to have fewer kids or god you know wants you to take birth control or god wants you to sterilize yourself or whatever you know whatever whatever the the the tactic is that they think will work best with a certain group they're going to use it i mean you and it's working too you're talking you're looking at at birth rates dropping from you know by two full people in just a just a generation you're in with regard to china to go to to go to remove 4.5 kids from each family unit in just 30 years is crazy okay um back to back to some of these these numbers i want to i'm going to read you i want to do an india china population where are we now where are we going sort of in a sort of a description here the united nations this is from the department of economic and social affairs population division of the united nations so where we stand right now is that it is almost a tie india has 1,429,000,000 people. China has 1,426,000,000 people. So 1.426 for China, 1.429 for India. Million here, million there. What's the difference? We're just going to say that they're even, Right. Close enough. By 2050, they have China at one point three one three billion and they have India at one point six seven billion. So now you're starting to look at just in the next 27 years, you've got an increase in India of about 350 million people. Above 350 million people more than China. More than China. as we get into the year 2100 so now we're talking about you know 77 years from now the numbers are very round it's 1.1 billion in china and it's 2.1 billion in india so by the end of this century this is according to the united nations india will have a full billion people more than China. Again, so you might want to plan accordingly. So, all right, let's move on to Africa because I got to read these numbers, man. I want to talk about fertility rates and population rates in Africa, the highest ones. And then I want to talk about the lowest ones because it's fascinating to see the difference in this. And you're going to think that like, you're going to think these numbers must be fake. They sound fake, but they're not. And so what I want to do is I'm going to read two sets of numbers to you. Where we were in 1990, and I know I'm throwing a lot of numbers and there will not be a test and there's not homework either. So you can just listen to it all you want and let the numbers just kind of wash all over you. These numbers are going to be staggering. So what we're going to talk about here is how the population rate, these numbers. Remember, I said 2.1 is what you need to just keep things trucking at replacement level, to bare minimum, to keep this population stable, keep it where it is today in the future. 2.1, that's what you need. I'm going to read you numbers of where we were in 1990 and where we were in 2020. So again, 30-year window. Let's see what happens to population rates in Africa. Really, I'm just going to mention the top 10 highest population rates in the world, but they're all in Africa. So it turns into a conversation about Africa because of that. And these are human beings. When I give you the number, when I say 2.1, that's 2.1 kids, right? So when I read these numbers off, these are kids, right? Number one in terms of highest population rate, 1990. I'm going to go back to the year I graduated high school. Niger, 7.8. 7.8. And that number has, over the last 30 years, it has dropped to 6.9. Again, the numbers that they drop to are also going to be staggering, just so you know. But I want you to recognize that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gavi and the World Health Organization and John Kerry's Daughters Group and all of these people are all in Africa and have been in Africa for a very long time. We go back to that Kissinger memo from 1974 that the United States policy towards the third world should be that of depopulation. And now you read – and that's 74. And then you read these numbers, and then you see the difference, and you go, well, something's depopulating. I mean something is changing these numbers, these fertility numbers by a lot. So we start with Niger, 7.8 drops down to 6.9. Somalia, 7.4 down to 6.4. the the country of chad 7.2 down to 6.4 the democratic republic of congo 6 kids in 1990 down to 6 essentially now 2020 i just gonna say now um molly 7 down to six central african republic stayed roughly the same at six and six Angola dropped from 7 kids in 1990 down to 5 That a huge drop Nigeria from 6 to 5 Burundi from 7 kids down to 5.2. They shaved more than two kids off in 30 years. And Benin from 6.7 down to 5.1. I'm going to give some honorable mentions here. I'll give honorable mention to the country of South Sudan. They went from 8.0 in 1990. Eight kids. If you lived in South Sudan, the average number of kids was eight. They went from eight in 1990 down to 4.5 now. That's a gigantic drop. um also an honorable mention the country of afghanistan though you know this may be for a variety of other reasons why this fertility rate is so low but in 1990 they were at 7.6 you know where they are now who knows it's a good they don't have a they don't have an answer for you because everything is in such disarray but they were at 7.6 in 1990 you know having kids so uh So that's the highest fertility rates. These numbers are staggering. I don't know how you could, I don't know eight kids, let alone have eight kids. You know what I mean? That would be a massive strain on anybody's budget, especially if you're living in the Democratic Republic of Congo or Mali or Burundi or Benin or someplace, and you're just trying to keep your shit together and keep everybody fed. Let's go to the places where they have the lowest fertility rates. I've got bad news for the people of South Korea. Your experiment is coming to an end here. You are going to be overtaken by North Korea. At some point, they're just going to walk south and conquer you. The lowest fertility rate in the world is in South Korea. It's 0.8. Again, remember, we've got to be at 2.1 to just maintain. They're at 0.8. 0.8. They don't even get a full person out of this. they're out there having half kids 80 kids in south that would explain the boy band situation i'm pretty sure hong kong is number two on the list they're at point nine puerto rico is tied with them also at point nine macau um an unusual portuguese enclave off the coast of hong kong i've been to maca you haven't lived until you've gone from a vegas casino with all of the crazy insanity that's going on there into a casino in macau where you might as well be in the fucking library it's dead silent and everyone looks like they're going to war in the because it's a weird place man i'll just say it um macau is at 1.1 uh singapore one i'm sorry macau is at 1.0 singapore is at 1.1 malta is at 1.1 ukraine is at 1.2 and dropping unfortunately for this bullshit war that we've got over there. Spain and Italy, both at 1.2. And rounding off the list at 10th in the lowest fertility is actually China. They're at 1.3 now, according to this list. They have dropped so far down that according to this, they're below replacement. So they're going to have demographic problems as well. For our Western countries, just to kind of put this all in perspective, where are we? Where are we? The United States is 1.6. Australia is 1.6. Canada is 1.4. There are 107 countries on this planet that are below the total fertility rate of 2.1 needed to maintain the population. Let's wrap up with this. I mentioned that there's a low fertility industrial complex it's real it's actually happening there's a lot of groups that are behind this we've discussed some of them you know you get the united nations and all those world government ngos and and you would expect them to be on this list but there are others and i figure we might as well at least talk about them let's first talk about the Population Council. This was started in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller III. This has sponsors by four of the most dangerous foundations in the world, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Hewlett Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation. These are all groups that are depopulation specific. They want people out of here. They want them off of their planet. They want the, especially in LDCs, lesser developed countries, as they call them, they definitely want to get rid of the browns. We want to get rid of all these brown people taking up space on our planet. And they do. And that's why you see these population rates that are plummeting. But the population replacement rates are plummeting. But unfortunately for these lunatics, the life expectancy is going through the roof. So they're going to have to target that. and this is how the population council describes itself to help achieve a humane equitable and sustainable balance for people and resources i feel like i have to do it in a british accent even though it was founded by the rockefellers who are not british um they are focused on working in developing countries on three different things, biomedical, social science, and public health research. So the Population Council is deeply involved in, I guess, counseling people on population. That's their cover story. The first president, Frederick Osborne, was the, you know, so you may be asking, well, maybe it's just Population Council. Like maybe maybe they're not really a bad group. Maybe they're just out there. You know, maybe they're just measuring the population. Maybe they just want to know what they're working with and and and help everybody, you know, like live a long life or anything. OK, well, I might be on board with that. I mean, you can make that case if you'd like. I'd love to see your evidence for it. But I'll tell you what piece of information I would put forward to sort of blow a hole in any sort of theories that the Population Council is some do-gooder organization is that their first president was a guy named Frederick Osborne. And Frederick Osborne was a founding member of the American Eugenics Society in 1926 and then went on to write a book. To escape from mere generalizations, went on to write a book that was titled Eugenics. So we know what eugenics is. Eugenics is depopulation. So this was the first president of the Population Council, a guy who wrote a book called Eugenics, a guy who was a founding member of the American Eugenics Society. So do you think that the Population Council is in charge of making the population bigger or smaller? Take a guess. You're right. Moving on to the Population Institute. Boy, it sounds like a hoot to go to this place. 1969, it was founded in Washington, D.C. so you know it's up to some satanic shit family planning and reproductive health is what they talk about and one of the things that they did was that they said we really need to use radio and tv serial dramas as a vehicle for improving public acceptance of family planning so they got together with hollywood and made sure that they could incorporate into the advertising or into the scripts the the the scripts of movies serial dramas television shows whatever they could get their hands on the writers for they wanted them to incorporate the concept of family planning and reproductive health into the storylines of the shows that was what they wanted to do so they're very devious they know how media works they know how the public you know loves television Of course, Population Institute started in 1969. So you're now starting to get into this like, oh, shit, I think the TV is going to be here for a while. It's going to be here to stay. We need to use it for the messaging to make sure that we get this information out about what's going on. And that's what the Population Institute was deeply involved in doing. And in but in 1980, they then shifted the focus to international, you know, international scope to to to really work on developing countries because they love them so much as they're, you know, trying to depopulate them. And then they had something called the Global Population Speak Out. This is a special project that was endorsed by Paul Ehrlich and Dennis Meadows. I don't know if you've ever seen Dennis Meadows. He's one of these Club of Rome old guy crazies who's been on camera talking about everyone's going to die in 10 years. We've got to get a handle on this. We've got to start thinning the herd. These guys are lunatics. Members of the Population Institute, again, you go, well, maybe it's not the worst thing in the world. I mean, how bad can the membership list be? uh well it's ted turner robert mcnamara john carey and paul erlich the guy who wrote the population bomb if that answers your question so not great uh and let's let's talk about this let's we'll we'll wrap up with this last one it's a london think tank called population matters and it is dealing with overpopulation and you know so the what's interesting is that these guys you're talking about like uh is the group that promotes abortions they promote sterilization and they promote contraception these are always in poor countries though they're not super concerned with this being it's a london-based think tank but it's not london specific in terms of where they're applying these concepts these concepts are almost always directed at the third world and and their and their goal is to reduce population growth by 1.3 billion that's they state this goal this isn't you didn't have to get this guy under like sodium pentothal and get them like tell us who's really tell us what you're really trying to do they're like no we'll just tell you we want to reduce the population very specific number too we want our goal is to reduce population growth by 1.3 billion and so then you go and you look at like well how are you doing that and they well under the cover of climate change you know and they said and and beyond that how climate change is impacting food and water and energy so they're very they're very upfront about this they're not hiding in the shadows you know pretending like they don't exist they're they're they're in london proudly talking about this of course they it's always framed as as you know we we are making the tough decisions that need to be made i mean you guys over there are just a bunch of mouth-breathing retards and here we are we're brave we're taking these we're making the the tough decisions that need to be made of eliminating six or seven out of every eight people on the planet but you know listen this takes a toll on us we need a hug we need a medal we need a an awards ceremony we need the united nations to come out and give us a some sort of you know i don't know proclamation of how how how much we're helping um and of course you know listen what they do is they lobby countries to force population control on the general public that this is what they do and they work in that one of the places that the population matters this group population matters has decided to focus was in kenya and in in specifically in the the largest slums of kenya and they're exclusively working on population control it's like they've they've opened up a the lid and they see a bunch of bugs in there and they go we got to get rid of all these bugs we got to figure out a way to get these bugs to you know so they just fumigate them and then close the lid that's what population matters is doing they're pushing the united nations to act on population control they want to make they want the united nations not that they have to twist their arm in any way shape or form but they want to make the united nations uh take population control and make that a priority through all of the united nations organizations that's what they say that's part of what what they're working on and so they pushed the 1992 world scientists warning this is a piece of fraud propaganda of the highest order right they they push it was it was a letter signed by 5 000 scientists that were pushing climate global destruction that the planet is going to be destroyed because of climate change we found these 5 000 scientists to all sign this thing called the world scientist warning and all of the predictions in there are incorrect they did this in 1992 so we've had 32 plus years to take a look at it and say well you know how how are these predictions going they're all they all failed so so i mean again of course their predictions failed because they're not predictions they're lies and propaganda and they're trying to make you feel a certain way so that you will then depopulate yourself um and look look a case can be made that if you have eight kids in south sudan this is not a formula for success for you or your eight kids right so could you make do with five kids instead of eight kids i mean there is it is in some way anchored in logic okay the problem is that it's not my place or their place to be telling these people how many kids they should and shouldn't have talk about none of my business literally none of my business what you do with your your family how many kids you have that is entirely your business keep like you should want to make sure that all of them are as are as given the best chance at survival and thriving in this world as possible or if you've made that calculation that you need eight of them i don't want eight kids it wouldn't work for me but it's not my position or my you know duty to stand up and tell these people that they're wrong. The United Nations feels differently about that. Known members of this cult of population matters? Well, don't worry. It's just David Attenborough, who is convinced that we're overpopulated. We've got Paul Ehrlich, who wants the population to be reduced to one billion people in harmony with nature. And of course, we have Jane Goodall, who gets the do-gooder reputation of being a lady that likes to sit in the woods and look at monkeys all day long. But in actuality, she's a world economic forum lunatic who is convinced that we are overpopulated and has never met a person that she didn't want to murder jane goodall for those of you like me they grew up going like oh gorillas in the mist and it's all it's so fascinating and she's out there communicating and doing all this stuff and this is this is amazing she's an environmentalist no she's not she's not an environmentalist at all she's as much of an environmentalist as prince philip was you know why because they're both both part of the world wildlife fund prince philip started it with prince bernhardt of the netherlands when they're not raping children they're starting the world wildlife fund and i can say that because they're both rapists by the way so listen i mean jane goodall is not your friend uh david attenborough may be doing these old documentary is talking about the amazing things of nature but in actuality he wants you dead as well uh we know about paul erlich paul erlich should be in an institution for his own safety and the safety of the planet as well but i'll tell you what man um if you think jane goodall is a is off her rocker just wait until you hear what jacques cousteau has to say about humanity hey if you like this episode you can take the additional step right now of sharing it with your friends and family have you rated the show oh boy if you think we are have earned five stars we certainly would appreciate it we will fight this algorithm battle as long as we have to thanks everybody talk to you again soon Thank you.