SUSPICIOUS: More Bizarre Details From WHCD Shooting. Was It Staged? | Candace Ep 339
54 min
•May 15, 202616 days agoSummary
Candace Owens analyzes alleged coordination between the U.S. military, White House, and media regarding the White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting, presenting an email from the White House Military Office that allegedly instructed amplification of Erica Kirk's video. She connects this to broader concerns about surveillance state infrastructure, data centers, and questions the authenticity of recent high-profile events.
Insights
- Military communications infrastructure is allegedly being used for domestic narrative coordination and social media amplification strategies, raising constitutional concerns about the militarization of information control
- Erica Kirk is characterized as an 'emotional response asset' in military communications, suggesting coordinated use of individuals in public events for psychological operations
- The rapid deployment of personnel and messaging infrastructure following the shooting suggests advance preparation rather than emergency response, indicating potential foreknowledge
- Data center expansion projects are being positioned as inevitable infrastructure despite massive public opposition, with political pressure overriding democratic objections
- Independent media and social platforms may be subject to the same military coordination and algorithmic manipulation as traditional media, undermining the assumption of independent commentary
Trends
Militarization of domestic information control through embedded communications agencies in civilian governmentUse of emotional narratives and individual 'assets' as vectors for coordinated psychological operationsCentralized algorithmic control of social media trends and narrative amplification by state actorsExpansion of surveillance infrastructure (facial recognition, data centers) under guise of security and technological progressCoordination between military, tech companies, and political organizations to shape public perception of eventsErosion of distinction between traditional and independent media through coordinated surrogacy networksStrategic use of grief and trauma narratives for political messaging and organizational recruitmentAdvancement of digital ID and surveillance state infrastructure despite public resistance
Topics
White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting incident analysisMilitary communications and domestic narrative coordinationErica Kirk's role and backgroundWhite House Military Office operationsSocial media amplification and algorithmic manipulationTurning Point USA organizational changesData center expansion and surveillance infrastructureFacial recognition technology and digital ID systemsOperation Mockingbird and CIA media control historyCharlie Kirk assassination and media coverageAdvertiser pressure campaigns and free market principlesVirtual reality and technological dystopiaFOIA requests and government transparencyAlibi verification and investigative journalismGolden Trump statue and religious symbolism
Companies
Turning Point USA
Organization allegedly coordinating with military and media; leadership changes post-Charlie Kirk assassination quest...
White House Communications Agency
Military-controlled communications entity embedded in White House; allegedly sent email coordinating narrative amplif...
Stratos (AI data center project)
Massive Utah data center project backed by Kevin O'Leary; approved despite thousands of public objections
CNN
Sidney Sidner uploaded video of Erica Kirk at 9:25 PM, minutes after shooting incident
X (formerly Twitter)
Platform allegedly controlled by military; artificial trends and narrative amplification suspected
Daily Wire
Candace Owens' current media partner; mentioned in context of show restart
Charlie Kirk Show
Show averaging 380 views per episode; uses fake callers; allegedly abandoning free market principles
Paramount Tactical
Military consultant providing public relations for Turning Point USA; criticized for logical fallacies in alibi defense
Dillon Law Group
Harmeet Dillon's firm; PR agent Matthew Shoup associated with event coverage
The Guardian
Published article on Utah data center project and public backlash
People
Candace Owens
Podcast host analyzing White House incident and military coordination allegations
Erica Kirk
Widow of Charlie Kirk; described as 'emotional response asset' in military email; subject of coordinated amplification
Charlie Kirk
Deceased founder; assassination analyzed as coordinated psychological operation with similar tactics to WHCD incident
Andrew Colvert
Allegedly signaled advertiser boycott of Candace Owens; criticized for abandoning free market principles
Blake Neff
Allegedly signaled advertiser boycott of Candace Owens; criticized for contradicting Charlie Kirk's values
Kevin O'Leary
Shark Tank investor backing Utah data center project; discussed surveillance implications with Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson
Interviewed Kevin O'Leary about data center and surveillance technology implications
Gary Melton
Green Beret providing PR for Turning Point USA; criticized for logical fallacies in defending alibi evidence
Sidney Sidner
Uploaded video of Erica Kirk at 9:25 PM, minutes after shooting; timing questioned as coordinated
Caroline Levitt
Recipient of military email coordinating narrative amplification; can confirm email authenticity
Steven Chong
Recipient of military email coordinating narrative amplification
Elizabeth Lane
Discussed psychopathic traits and dream analysis related to Charlie Kirk assassination
Harmeet Dillon
Allegedly present at WHCD event; associated with PR agents covering incident
Matthew Shoup
Questioned as potential photographer of Erica Kirk video; associated with event coverage
Tracy Martin
15-year friend of Erica Kirk; clarified that son in alibi photo is not Erica's child
Brigitte
Mentioned in opening; fell during previous episode
Quotes
"We are living inside of an episode of Black Mirror. It's, this is to be clear, Operation Mockingbird on steroids, right?"
Candace Owens•Early in episode
"She is described in the email as an emotional response asset. That is stunning, an emotional response asset."
Candace Owens•Mid-episode
"The Department of Defense instructing teams internally on how to immediately begin to engineer and to conduit our emotions. We, all of us, we were the actual targets of the White House Correspondents Dinner shooting."
Candace Owens•Mid-episode
"I would say that now with the amount of high resolution video and surveillance that is built into every street corner, that's how they solve a lot of crimes."
Kevin O'Leary•During Tucker Carlson interview segment
"The definition of nefarious changes, as you know, I mean, hundreds of thousands of American citizens were sent to concentration camps by Franklin Roosevelt because they were Japanese."
Tucker Carlson•During Kevin O'Leary interview segment
Full Transcript
All right, you guys, happy Thursday, especially to Brigitte. I felt so bad that Brigitte fell on her face yesterday. I just wanted Brigitte to be here for the intro. Brigitte, my Brigitte doll. My Brigitte doll. Anyway, as we were discussing yesterday, scandal at the White House, scandal at the White House. It is in fact a big scandal. We're not gonna let this go. We have more people who are talking and it's not looking good. There seems to be an unholy alliance emerging between Turning Point USA, the White House, and the military. We need to begin the process of FOIAing the communications that went on during the evening of April 25th, the day of the alleged White House shooting. So let's get started. Welcome back to Candice. Where to begin? Let's discuss that series Black Mirror. Did you guys watch Black Mirror? It was a highly successful television series. I watched it. It ran for seven seasons. Now, for those of you who have not seen it, it was essentially about the not-so-distant dystopian technological future. If I had to boil it down in layman terms, I would say that it sort of implied a moment where technology would overtake humanity. Every episode is different, but the implication is the same, that things are eventually going to become automated and they are going to be able to monitor and control humanity via systems. So this is one of the reasons that I just never, ever, ever will be a supporter of VR glasses. I tried them one time and just went, nope. I think a lot of people maybe tried them the same way, but I put them on. And in my virtual reality, I was on a cliff and they told me to jump. And obviously I knew that I was standing in a room, not actually on a cliff, but I wouldn't jump. I was terrified. The virtual reality seemed more real to me than the perfectly safe actual reality that I knew that I was in. It was terrifying, right? Just like an episode of Black Mirror to me, where they, I think, eventually are aiming to convince people to give up believing in actual reality, to instead live in sort of a permanent simulated reality. Anyway, I really do believe that that is the express goal of the United States military right now. I actually should say the global military right now. We are living inside of an episode of Black Mirror. It's, this is to be clear, Operation Mockingbird on steroids, right? After JFK gets assassinated, the CIA gets into an alliance with the mainstream media and they begin trying to control our minds. Just repeat the same talking points and eventually believe it. That's what's been going on, right? It's extended now. The mainstream media has collapsed and now they say there are these independent voices on social media. Are they actually independent? Are they a part of a new system that has adapted and is still attempting to manufacture our reality? Well, it turns out the White House Correspondence Dinner, which turned into an emergency, is potentially stunning proof of just the scenario that I'm describing. Like I said, massive scandal. The email that we presented that the White House Military Office sent out to immediately begin amplifying Erica Kirk of all people provides us with a rare opportunity to really reflect on what is going on right now in this country and beyond and why, okay? So let's back this up. We are supposed to believe that the White House Correspondence Dinner, the shooting was not staged, right? Gosh, you'd be crazy to think that it was staged. You would be, well, a conspiracy theorist. A term that the CIA came up with after they assassinated JFK. Instead, it is supposed to then make more rational sense to us that for the first time in the history of the world, a sitting president has survived, not one, not two, but three separate shooting assassination attempts all in the span of just under two years. So to be clear, what I mean is not just like foiled attempts, finding people online, organizing, discussing, harming the president on the internet, maybe radicalized groups, threatening, plotting to bring harm to him. I'm sure that goes on all the time all across the world. But I'm talking about a physical, literal, public shooting attempt where a would-be assassin carrying a loaded gun gets close enough to fire shots or warrant shots being fired to stop him. Trump has survived three of these attempts now. It is truly remarkable. If only his friend Charlie Kirk had that sort of luck, right? Now, just for comparison, there are world leaders who have been in power for much longer than Trump, have been presidents of countries for over 20 years, like Vladimir Putin as just one example. He has been the president of Russia for 22 years and he has not endured. He's not endured that sort of a thing, that sort of a pattern, despite the routine, the demonization of Russia, the nation, the people, by the entire Western media. I don't know, maybe Trump should consider hiring his security apparatus. That's just a suggestion. You can park that in the suggestion box. Conspiracy theorists should think critically, as they typically do, about the true aims of the White House Correspondent's Dinner, right? We were at first completely gaslit and told that we were terrible people for suggesting that the Erica Clip seemed to be sort of artificially promoted in our face. But now we have the proof, at the very least, that its amplification was designed by the military. That is a fact, okay? That is not a fact. And it's a fact that you're probably not going to see the media want to cover, lest we forget, by the way, Dr. Erica Kirk was herself promoted to the Air Force Academy Board of Visitors in her husband's stead, for reasons that are not unclear to us if she's qualified. What we know now, which I can confirm to you, is that just ahead of the White House Correspondent's Dinner shooting, Erica Kirk visited the West Wing. Now, my assumption is that she went with Andrew Colvett and Mikey McCoy, but I cannot yet confirm that. Don't worry, I will. What Erica Kirk was doing in the West Wing is also unknown, since we were notified by her that the entire purpose of her trip to DC, despite telling us that she was terrified to travel and people were tracking her planes, not even the Secret Service can make her feel safe. We were then told just a few days later, when she was here in a white dress, that she did this and braved everything to confront Daily Mail reporters, right? Okay, Erica, are the Daily Mail reporters in the West Wing with us now? What are you doing there? To recap, the shooting happened at 8.39 PM, Eastern, Sidney Sidner of CNN uploaded the video of Erica Kirk at 9.25 PM, and approximately 25 minutes later, we revealed to you that the White House Military Office sent out follow-up instructions in an email that accidentally went out to the wrong internal teams. Now, it is important to note, I'm gonna show it to you here on the screen, because I was able to manually, I just typed it, the email verbatim, onto Microsoft Word to protect my source from that canary email tactic that's employed by the Department of Defense. Make no mistake, this email is coming from the Department of Defense. But this is verbatim, what the relevant portion of the email read. Here, you have it up on the screen, Addendum Erica Kirk video clip, video clip of Erica Kirk leaving the ballroom area and stating, I just wanna go home, is driving the highest engagement of all instant related content across platforms. Our current digital assessment is strongest emotional response, asset associated with incident, high cross ideological circulation, elevated repost velocity among political commentary accounts, increasing use as symbolic framing device regarding media conduct and national stability narratives. Our recommendation, that's the recommendation here, all communications channels should amplify this clip, coordinate with our digital partners, that is, and our approved surrogates, I'd like to know who those people are, to elevate, reach and ensure dominant placement in the overnight information environment. So they wanted us to wake up on Sunday and it to be about Erica Kirk, that needs to be dominant in the information environment. It then goes on, and this is important too, to describe external commentary. Expect aligned outside commentators, so talking about their surrogates to independently amplify the professionalism of protective response, the media conduct during the evacuation, political rhetoric and escalation concerns, we saw all of this happening, broader executive stability themes. Okay, we're gonna talk about that later. Now the first astonishing thing about this email is who it came from, this is important, okay? The email was delivered from the military office domain from the White House Communications Agency. Okay, you need to understand what that means. The White House Communications Agency is like the military arm of White House communications. So from some sources within the White House, I'm gonna read this quote, the White House Correspondence Agency is a Department of Defense controlled military communications entity that is embedded inside of the White House itself. Its primary function is maintaining secure presidential communications, continuity, infrastructure and command and control systems during crises. The idea that this military linked communications apparatus participated in domestic narrative coordination raises profound constitutional and democratic concerns. Okay, end quote. Now you should know who the email was sent to because you see some morons online saying, okay let's just type this up. Oh yeah, that seems like a really good idea. I'm sure I'll just make up an email and expect not to be called out, called out on it. The email was sent to Caroline Levitz Press Office and team, so she can confirm its authenticity. The National Security Press Team, the National Security Operations Team, copied onto this email, we covered some of this yesterday with Steven Chong, who is the White House Communications Director, Richard Smalley, who is the communications officer and the Information Assurance Engineer, sounds so dystopian, at the White House Communications Agency. So that's military position. Gustav Anderle, also military position information systems manager at the White House Communications Agency, and Ryan Ripian. Ryan Ripian is the commander of Naval Communications. They also have someone named Makayla Mott, who was on this email, also Navy. The document reveals the emergence of a modern hybrid system where military communications infrastructure, intelligence-linked monitoring, behavioral analytics, they were monitoring that too, social media, amplification strategies, and centralized federal messaging converge into this unified information-controlled architecture operating behind the scenes of public events. We weren't aware of this, you're supposed to believe this is happening natural, that you are not being impacted, that you are not being targeted by the government, and make no mistake, that is what we have uncovered. The Department of Defense instructing teams internally on how to immediately begin to engineer and to conduit our emotions. We, all of us, we were the actual targets of the White House Correspondents Dinner shooting. Jokes on you, if you thought on us, I guess, if we thought that it was actually the White House, the people that work around the White House and the Department of Justice. During a time period when they should have only been concerned about safety, right, within an hour this took place. They prioritized Erica Kirk and engineering our emotions about her. She is described in the email as an emotional response asset. That is stunning, an emotional response asset, and there's more. Now, we've also learned from White House sources that something else that was unusual that evening was the lack of a scramble, okay? A lack of scramble, let me explain, do my best to explain what that means. It's important that you remember that the dinner took place on a Saturday evening across town, okay? The White House was therefore not open for business. This is a Saturday. Internal teams tell me that what is most remarkable is that for some reason, that email, that evening, the White House Campus Security Protocol and the perimeters were just out of the ordinary. Everybody was somehow available and on standby for some unknown reason. Were it completely unplanned? You might imagine there would have been the scramble to get all the appropriate personnel back to the White House in time for this unplanned press conference. Maybe they're up in Virginia where they live. Maybe they went on vacation. Maybe they went to go see their families. How are we gonna, whoa, what are we gonna do? We gotta get back to the White House within two hours of a shooting. But that evening, everything was clean as though they were all anticipating a late night presser at the White House, which as we know, took place at 10.33 p.m., so less than two hours after the shooting. Everyone just had it together and were there. They said things ran too smoothly. They've been in situations where it is a situation and people scramble. That was not what occurred that night. So we know the military comms wanted Erica Kirk to be number one by Sunday morning check that was accomplished. Mission, extract Max attention via the video and Max sympathy for Erica Kirk. And then our emotional asset is going to break her silence on social media, writing this. Saturday was yet another traumatic example of the evil in our country and the continued rise in political violence. I'm taking time to spend with my family. I will be joining the Charlie Kirk show Wednesday at 12 p.m. Eastern to briefly address what took place. Enough is enough. Just love that that transition from I'm taking time to be with my family to and I will be on the Charlie Kirk show Wednesday. Just incredible, complete lack of self-awareness. Anyway, Erica's pending speech in my view was intended to begin phase two of the military psychological operation highlighted in the email itself. That part I told you to pay extra attention to what they were asking for beyond that. The points that they wanted delivered the professionalism of the protective response was to be highlighted. We saw that all across social media, a bizarre, instant headline, Kashpatel, a hero, it's just completely ridiculous. This is just, you should laugh at this. Kashpatel's stunning reaction as the shooter opened fire at a White House Correspondent Center. He's described as a hero, by the way, if you read the article, because he just says get down. He instructs others at the table to get down. They, I don't know how they somehow got like 800 words out of he said get down. And then he got down and he's a hero. Okay, guess he needed some good press after he was called an alcoholic. Plus the number two on the email list is to highlight the political rhetoric, the escalation concerns. Remember we started suddenly Caroline Levitt, everybody's starting to talk about hate speech. Oh my God, what's happening? Everybody is, these words are violence. Your words are actually violence. Erica Kirk herself discussed that when Wednesday hit, take a listen. And while we may have big problems with illegal immigration in this country, I have to tell you, we have an even bigger problem when it comes to the systemic indoctrination and radicalization of our own citizens. This is what got my husband killed. This is what has led to three legitimate attempts on President Trump's life. Okay. And then they list the broader executive stability themes, which you could just say was Trump needs his ballroom, right? There's just got to be more done to stabilize things and that's his ballroom. And I think we may have found the surrogates. I think they might be right here guys. Just have a call to gut feeling. Anyway, the ballroom is not something that should be ignored because this is not about a ballroom obviously, this is about the next step, right? Phase two is the communication, the events you have the communication and then ultimately what is it intended to be ushered in for humanity. And I think it's pretty obvious that it's data centers, right? That's what they want. It doesn't care about a ballroom, you can do events wherever you want. The data center beneath the ballroom, that's what they're suddenly pushing, by the way, all across America, you've seen the headlines. A data center intended to be twice the size of Manhattan in Utah. Here's the headline of the Guardian, irresponsible. Someone claims the people are claiming backlash as Utah approves a data center twice the size of Manhattan. A plan to create one of the world's largest data centers, the Gargantuan Project spanning an area more than twice the size of Manhattan has provoked a furious public backlash in Utah amid concerns over its vast energy use and impact upon the state's stressed water supplies. The Stratos artificial intelligence data center footprint will cover more than 40,000 acres over three sites in Box Elder County in Northwestern Utah. The facility will require about nine gigawatts of power, which is more than the entire state of Utah currently consumes. And it's going to suck up a significant amount of water in an area that has been hit by severe drought in recent years. Last week, the project was approved by the county's commissioners, despite thousands of objections lodged by Utah residents. Jokes on you Utah residents, they will pay off these politicians. They don't care about you. You are something to be managed. There are people that are corrupt. They will pay them off. We don't care how much you protest. You're getting these data centers. That's what happened here. It goes on to tell us that the proposed project is backed by Kevin O'Leary, the venture capitalist who appeared on the TV show Shark Tank. O'Leary has claimed that Stratos will deliver thousands of jobs. That's what you get. We're going to get data center, probably a few more droughts, but there will be jobs that you should expect. And you should want those jobs. We're going to compete with China. That's the pitch. You're going to compete with China. No, I think what's happening is our government is competing with China to create a surveillance state happening. It tells us that, like I said, 4,000 people lodged objections to the project being approved. The pushback led to contentious public meetings between that Lee Perry, who was the Box Elder County commissioner, said left him feeling physically sick, amidst alleged death threats and false accusations. I'm just going to go ahead and say the government is corrupt. O'Leary has claimed in social media posts that most of the protesters don't live locally and have been paid to object to the project. Oh, I'm sure. Why would someone want to object? It must be unnatural. Humans objecting to a data center that's going to impact their lives. Hi, powered artificial intelligence centers all across the United States. That's what's happening. But the question is, to what end? What is the actual goal? It's obviously evil and dystopian. If you're not aware of that, you have to wake up to it. The aim, to me, appears very clearly to be a surveillance state. Like I said, they want what China has. They want to monitor all of us. You're seeing that already at the airport. How many pictures can be taken that they're trying to learn your face every single person needs to have a digital ID and this ID and we can know every second where you're going? That's going to require some data centers. There is an unholy alliance between the military and our press trying to convince us that this is fine, that it's normal, that we're being thrust into a state where we won't even be able to turn on our cars without government approval. They already can shut down a large portion of cars automatically, the newer ones. They can just literally while you're driving shut that down. But they want more. They want to know where you are every second of every day, what you're thinking, what you're writing, who you're speaking to. Listen to this conversation that Kevin O'Leary had with Tucker Carlson about his investment in that Utah data center. I mean, it seems like AI will make it possible to know what every American is doing at all times. Correct me if I'm wrong. I would say that's not AI that's going to do that. I would say now with the amount of high resolution video and surveillance that is built into every street corner, that's how they solve a lot of crimes. Now, if you don't like that. Do they solve a lot of crimes? Has the closure rate for murders in our big cities, like what percentage of murders are in New York City or Chicago or Detroit are solved? I don't track them. Pretty low actually. It's lower in this country than the parts of the world. The point is surveillance isn't a great issue, but the enhancement of surveillance with AI tools is how you now walk through the Dubai airport and you also walk through some airports here in the US. Facial recognition technology has finally got to the resolution using AI's tools. Why? It's going to run through your data center. There'll be pictures of all of us in your data center. Every data center. Right, so you don't have to opt into that program, by the way, I do it for convenience. I'm not hiding anything. Well, it's on street corners, as you said. So anytime you're in public, your face is being surveilled by the US government. Yes, it is, but I'm not doing nefarious things. I'm not a criminal and I'm not stealing any money from anybody, so. The definition of nefarious changes, as you know, I mean, hundreds of thousands of American citizens were sent to concentration camps by Franklin Roosevelt because they were Japanese. Correct. So in 1940, it was not a crime to be Japanese. In 1941, it was. So the definition does change, as you know. It's true. So you could have those concerns, but I ask you again, Tucker. I do. No, and I know you do, but I ask you again, and you haven't answered my question. Do you want the insurance policy or not? Would you, with all of the nefarious concerns about AI, which outcome do you prefer as an American for your family? Would you prefer all of us that are developing these data centers put down our shovels and stop while the Chinese accelerate theirs? Would you like that? Yeah, because I don't live in China. So you can just move to China and compete with people in China. That's, that is what makes the most sense to me. You're, instead of turning America into China. As I said, we are looking at an unholy alliance. It is between the military. It is between the press and I would add here, turning point USA. Okay. They are not a charity in my view. I had very early on investigating the trolley assassination underscored how it seems that everyone is randomly connected to the military at that organization. Like that was new. That was like, it wasn't that way when I was there. That suddenly everyone's got this connection to the military. Now we have Erica Kirk herself artificially appointed to the Air Force Board of Visitors. Erica, not a grieving widow. Okay. She's a piece of, as far as I'm concerned, military technology that's intended to socially engineer on behalf of the military. Like that's what she's, that's what she's out there doing. She's like a piece of Israeli tech. Again, my opinion and welcome to it. It's my show. She socially engineered Charlie with much success. She is now being used to socially engineer the public with the full weight of the United States military behind her. I would argue in that way, she was intended to be an asset, but she has proven herself to be a liability because the people see right through her. And I would like to add also that everything about the Charlie Kirk assassination mirrors the White House Correspondence Dinner strategy being executed in the shadows by the military, right? The intended social media virality of the clip. The conversation about Erica, make it about Erica, the focus about the widow, right? We need the image, the graphics capturing her inside of his casket. Hit an emotional peak. The world will then wait. They'll feel crushed for her. And then they'll wait to hear her speak. And when she does speak, we hit phase two. Then she instructs us at a podium 48 hours later, same with this, White House Correspondence Dinner, 48 hours later, she tells us, sign up for Turning Point USA. That's what she did. Sign up for Turning Point USA. Here's what you can do if you wanna honor Charlie. Sign up for Turning Point USA right now. And then beyond that, we should join her a week later in forgiving Tyler Robinson. This is a pattern. This is a pattern that is emerging. And this email is very serious. We should FOIA request all of the emails that went out that night, all of the instructions that went out that night about messaging to the public. The AI video of Charlie's voice, appointing her to take over for him, alleged AI video by the donors who were present in the room and said he never said it. A picture is starting to emerge. I believe that with the Charlie Kirk assassination, we were made to see and to hear exactly what they wanted us to. Again, we are the targets. Charlie was a target and we are now the targets and we need to fight this pending, dystopian surveillance state nightmare with everything that we have or we will end up enslaved by this. That's their goal. I have no doubt. And Turning Point appears to be playing its role. We'll be right back after a break. All right, you guys, some moments change everything. And for a woman that's facing an unexpected pregnancy, seeing her baby on an ultrasound and hearing that tiny heartbeat can turn fear into hope. In fact, it doubles the chance that she'll choose life. That's why pre-born exists through free ultrasounds, compassionate care and real support. Pre-born reaches women who feel overwhelmed and alone giving them the chance to choose life for their babies and the future for themselves. But the support does not stop there. Pre-born continues helping moms after birth with essentials like diapers, baby clothes, maternity support, counseling, parenting resources and encouragement. Today, you can help a scared woman become a confident mother. A donation of just $28 provides one free ultrasound and $140 can help reach five women in crisis. Donate simply dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby. That's pound 250 baby or visit pre-born.com slash Candace. Again, that's pre-born.com slash Candace. I also wanna tell you guys about PDS debt because maybe you are working hard every day but somehow still feel like your money is disappearing faster than you can even earn it. There's rising bills, credit card payments and financial stress and it can make it feel impossible to get ahead. Minimum payments are not designed to get you out of debt. They're designed to keep you stuck. PDS debt is the way out. They can reduce up to half of what you owe on credit cards, personal loans and medical bills. And it starts with a free 30 second assessment at PDSdebt.com slash Candace. Stop juggling multiple payments and get one lower monthly payment with zero credit impact. You'll begin saving the day that you complete the 30 second assessment. If you are carrying any balance on your credit cards, it's costing you money every single day. No minimum credit score is required. PDS debt is the top-rated company in the industry with thousands of five star reviews and an A plus rating on the Better Business Bureau website. So get your free 30 second personalized assessment today at PDSdebt.com slash Candace. And that's PDSdebt.com slash Candace. I just want to add here, call it a hunch but I believe that the military is controlling X. Like we've been speaking about these artificial trends that appear and disappear when they don't want people to be discussing something. All of that now feels very fake. I didn't feel this way when Jack Dorsey was at the helm of Twitter. But there's like I said, a military alliance with all of these Silicon bros, these A of the race for AI technology. And there's definitely going to be something there that I think is going to be revealed. Anyway, let's talk about some other changes over our turning point. So Charlie Kirk believed in free markets. Obviously that's why he established Turning Point USA. That's what he was doing traveling the country, trying to start up college chapters, telling people to embrace free markets, capitalism. That was it. Long before TPUS faith took over, that's what Charlie Kirk's main focus was. So let's check in on his organization's message now. Maybe we can find a clue as to why what was once a top 10 show, the Charlie Kirk show, is now averaging 380 views per an episode. That is abysmal, okay? So on the Charlie Kirk show, they do this thing where despite these very low views, they pretend that they have live callers. And just so you know how this works in the industry, when you don't have anybody calling, they just get a producer to go into the kitchen and fake call and ask the question that you actually want to answer. So they pretend it's like, oh, I didn't even want to talk about this topic. But since you asked producer in the kitchen, pretending to be Barbara from Manhattan, I'll say what I actually just want to say, but don't have the courage to say. And would you know, I can't believe I missed this, that on the very weekend that I told you guys that all of these Zio bots, as I term them, we should call them Shabbats, right? These Israeli clone accounts that are like super pro Erika, pro Turning Point USA, pro blowing up Palestinian kids. Like there's like, you just draw a direct line on X, began trying to organize this boycott of my advertisers. Well, guess what? Guess who did it first? In a gentle way, Blake Neff and Andrew Colvet. That's who signaled it first. I cannot believe I missed this clip from their Friday, May 8th show, take a listen. Preborn is a sponsor of Candice Owen's show. And that is, I know frustrating because they've been a sponsor of our show and for a long time. And we love the work that Preborn does. And you know, it's interesting. If it was a different category then maybe I would feel more, I guess, one way or the other about it. But because it's saving babies, God will use that which was meant for ill and he will use it to bless people. And that's a lesson that we get from Joseph in the Bible. And I just, I believe it, right? And God will use all things for his good and his glory. And so we trust in that. And listen, it's saving babies. And if that's one of the good things that comes out of that partnership, then I'm all for it actually. And I've thought hard about this and I've thought, should I make a fuss? Should I send emails or make phone calls? And it's kind of like, and to your other part of your question where you said, is there something about sponsorships that you're unaware of? Yeah, sometimes you're locked in in contracts and you could get yourself into legal liability issues if you pull out of a contract without cause beforehand. Now, the question is, is there cause? I would venture to guess, yes there is, but if you're locked into contractual terms, the easiest option is probably just to continue on. And when somebody has a large audience, which Candace does, there's no denying that she does, then you're probably gonna get a lot of referrals. And so anyways, we wanna bless babies more than we want some sort of, feud to take priority over that. And yeah, we didn't start the fight, she did, but at the same time, it's babies and I want more babies. And I would say, I would also add, even if we're not looking to pick a fight of that nature, if you feel strongly about it, I would encourage you to send them an email. You could say, I have concerns, I might see support or I might support you more if you were to make a different decision of this nature. I am, maybe they would be blessed if they made that decision. And I know. You can't make it up. You cannot make up how perfectly the 180 degree turn is from everything Charlie, it's like they never listened to Charlie Kirk speak once on his own show. I think that's why they had to remove all the content. It's like, you know, we're just gonna go so what 80. That's better to pretend, it's just better to just pretend that Charlie was never here. But that's gotta be the reason behind pulling all this. What are the free markets? That is not the free market. That is literally a leftist strategy, okay, where you get a bunch of people a mob to call and to complain people that actually are not partaking in that market, they don't care about it, they don't care about this business at all, but they're gonna call and they're gonna stress them out and try to peer pressure them into pulling out. Secondly, I wanna say this, we do not put handcuffs on our sponsors. Okay, we do not put handcuffs on our sponsors. In fact, we were very intentional when we restarted the show after everything I went through the Daily Wire to have personal conversations and to make it very clear that we don't want those kinds of advertisers that are gonna bulk when it comes to a fight. The free markets have already made it very clear to you, Turning Point USA, your Charlie Kirk show, that they don't like you and what you are doing right there is exactly why. Charlie Kirk's audience never had to hear that kind of filth, never had to hear something that was counter to the free markets, never had to hear somebody say, you know, I was gonna call and I was gonna kick up a fuss and I was gonna try to like artificially get her kicked out of the markets and not let, you know, people decide what they wanna watch and views based on those things. I was gonna call her evil and demonic, but they say babies. So that is the only reason I'm gonna go with this is because they say babies because there's something bigger here and I'm a good Christian, right? It's very, that's the whole reason I'm gonna, but like if it was anybody else, by the way, if you wanna call and do that, you should do that. This again, could not sit more opposite to what Charlie Kirk believed in. He could believe that he could compete and be better than you than his show would get more views than your show and advertisers would wanna come to him naturally. He didn't believe that he had to just be an evil human being behind the scenes, list people's advertisers, start speaking about their advertisers and pretend that you're not putting pressure or glazing people that are listing all their advertisers at the same time. Well, that entire scene pretend to be a good person while you're doing everything that Charlie would hate. You are so ill-representative of Charlie Kirk. Please give the name of new show. Just call it the Andrew and Blake saga, you know? Andrew and Blake could complain about everything. Andrew and Blake maybe kinda hate Charlie Kirk and everything he believed in, but they played a part for as long as they could and now they're here to tell you what they think and yeah, nothing lines up with the principles of what began Turning Point USA. So that would be my advice to them. And I think by the way, then you could get more viewers because then people would go, okay, now we see what this is. You no longer are wearing this mask of pretending that you are carrying on the torch for Charlie. I mean, just how embarrassing. I should have known that they were behind it. It was just like, what is going on over this weekend? And thank you, Turning Point USA, Andrew Colbert, Blake for like I said, leading to the biggest day of merch sales on our website ever. Because our fans, I will tell you right now, people who watch this show, our listeners, they will fight harder, okay? You guys have power, you've got the military, you've got CBS, Barry Weiss, the president's office, the White House, the military office all behind you, and we're still winning because we have a better product. It's truth. Good luck with your lies. And speaking of lies and people who tell them, sometimes accidentally because they're just stupid, Paramount not so tactical, doesn't understand what an alibi is, okay? So we showed you the clip, the now-famed clip of Erica and Andrew Colbert orchestrating this Fort Wachuka non-alibi behind the scenes and Paramount tactical, who is not a very quick reader, did not realize that he was not supposed to read out the alibi or show the picture, and he accidentally did, okay? So now that he's accidentally now rumbled the fact that the internet was correct, that these didn't look like Erica's children. At first he said, like, you know, it's not her son. Like I said, there have been people who say that it's also not her daughter, but who am I to make that claim? But people with direct knowledge and who know the daughter say that it is not her. Anyway, Paramount tactical now is raging about that, and he says actually, it doesn't even matter if neither of them are her children. It's not relevant at all. Do you know what an alibi is? If you're saying her alibi issues with her children, it would kind of be relevant, Gary Melton, if these are in fact her children, okay? So this is what he tweeted. This is peak clarity. He tweeted, the fact is we don't know. It hasn't been clarified by Erica, but it doesn't matter. The content of the picture was irrelevant. It was irrelevant. It was proof that she wasn't at Fort Wachuka on the night. No, Gary, let's just take apart that sentence. I really hope you're not watching Baron Coleman's show because that's a high IQ outfit and he would really be upset with this and he would bring up a logic book and this would be a mess, okay? So if it is proof that she was not at Fort Wachuka on the night, and if the proof that you presented was that she was with her kids, then indeed, Gary Melton, the content of the picture is relevant, especially if it's not her kids. That's how alibis work. He goes, why do you care whose kid it is? It's none of your business. Like, Gary, you introduced this to the public as an alibi for Erica and proof that she wasn't at Fort Wachuka and was in fact with her kids. Now you're saying it doesn't even matter if it's her kids and it doesn't, the content of the picture is not relevant and somehow it's still proof. How could it be proof of Erica's not even in the picture? It was stupid off the bat because Erica's not in the picture. So all it would be proof of is her kids. Now you're saying it's not her kids, Gary. Now you're telling us it's not her kids. The content of the picture is not relevant and somehow we should still accept it as proof that she wasn't at Fort Wachuka. I'm very terrified, terrified to understand that Paramount not so tactical served as a green beret. I'm terrified that China represents a threat not because of their data centers that are expanding but because they might have smarter people than Gary Melton. Like this is a military operative, turning point is turning to him for public relations and he doesn't even understand the functionality of an alibi. He doesn't understand why people are obviously concerned about the fact that his alibi has now been completely debunked. Now he just says it doesn't matter who's kid it is. Still counts, Erica is good. And then he rants about why he's never gonna present an alibi ever again. Because this is why anyone who presents alibis or information is an idiot. It's also why no one should ever trust Candace Owens. It's never enough, never accepted or she twists what's provided into another conspiracy. No, I was not handed this alibi actually. You were, you submitted it and then it got debunked by you. It's all very confusing and now you're angry but not at you, you're angry at me. This is, with him it really is an IQ thing. He is just very fun to watch. You know, just, there's just no brain there. They just have to use more intellectual people. Maybe AI, maybe you should just create an AI paramount, not so tactical. I think the AI could do better than that. In Kevin Leary's defense, that might be why they're doing it. They're realizing that's problematic. Anyway, even Tracy Martin, Erica's dear long 15 year friend jumped into the ferrite at some point and clarified that the son is not Erica's. So it's all very confusing. Says it's called a play date with friends. She's not saying that that's Gigi, but she's also confirming that it's not the son. The internet was right. It was first a conspiracy and now it's true. Just takes a couple of months for that to happen usually. I do want to briefly discuss, before we get off air today, Trump's golden Trump statue, right? The backlash to, it just can't believe it's real. I just can't believe it's real. It is real. Are we sure it's real? That's not AI. Okay, that is Trump's statue. The ceremony obviously, evangelical pastor comes out. This has been unveiled a 22 foot golden statue of President Donald Trump at one of Florida's golf courses. And the pastor, John Arc Burns, an evangelical minister is defending it because people are feeling a type of way about it. Like I feel like if you watch this show and you're not spiritual and you maybe don't go to church and you've never cracked open a Bible, I feel like even you, when you look at this statue, you think, should I build an ark? Should I go collect animals to bring into this ark? You just start asking yourself spiritual questions like, maybe I should listen to the guy in the subway who's ranting about the end of times. Maybe I shouldn't have slammed the door on all of those Jehovah witnesses. You look at this statue and the gathering of people around it and it just feels like we've gone too far. Something's not right. Trump who thinks he is a God, I am Maga, now has a golden statue, of course backed not by Christians financially, but by I believe the Hasidic Jewish community, major donors to this statue. And we're supposed to just think things are okay. Here's Herat's beautiful piece of art, the Hasidic Jews behind Florida's giant golden Trump statue. I just think that maybe you should go to church. A Catholic church, of course, I'm allowed to be biased. Anyway, you guys, we will be right back after a brief break. All right, you guys, if you're looking for a simple way to feel better from the inside out, let me tell you about Just Thrive. They're probiotic is clinically proven to arrive 100% alive in your gut. So it actually works where it matters. That means less bloating, more natural energy and even clearer looking skin that you notice. And if digestion or cravings are a struggle for you, their digestive bitters can help. It's a blend of 12 science backed herbs in one easy capsule that helps kickstart digestion and supports your body's natural signals so that you feel more in control, not the other way around. Together, these products support a healthier gut which is key to feeling like your best self fast. Just Thrive has been trusted for over a decade, helping thousands of people take charge of their health with high quality science backed supplements for gut immune and brain support. You're ready to try for yourself and just take the Just Thrive feel better challenge and get 20% off your first order. You can head to justthrivehealth.com slash Candace and don't worry, there is a 100% money back guarantee so you have nothing to lose. Again, that's justthrivehealth.com slash Candace. I also wanna tell you guys about Loretto Publications because have you ever felt like you are searching for real spiritual truth but you're not sure who to trust anymore? I've definitely been there. That's why I wanna share something that I find incredibly valuable. It's your traditional Catholic book company called Loretto Publications and their entire mission is simple, spreading the truth of the Catholic faith. What I love about them is the quality and the authenticity. They publish some of the most accurate editions of scripture available in English including the 1859 Hadoch edition of the Dewey Reims Bible. And this isn't just any Bible, it's packed with thousands of footnotes and commentary from the early church fathers and doctors. It really brings the faith to life in a deeper way but it doesn't stop there. They have everything, Bible commentaries, books on Mary and the saints, church history, philosophy, catechisms, missiles, prayer books, even works that dive into the Catholic social teaching and the kingship of Christ in today's world. So if you've been wanting to understand what the apostles in early church actually taught and what Christ is king really means, head to LorettoPubs.org. Again, that's LorettoPubs.org. All right, top comment from yesterday's episode from N. Horvath writes, it was the fakest of times, it was the gayest of times. Yes, that is the chapter we are in. That book will begin with that exact line. Ori writes, I stopped my infiltration of a gang to watch this. I love when people do comments like this, yeah. Did you submit letters from your elementary school picture, Tori? Did you? Hmm? Did you? See whether or not you did that. If I know whether or not you're good with your kindergarten teacher. Anyway, you guys, some comments from today's episode. First, from Xamatt writes, if restaurants were serving what the mainstream media is, the health department would shut them down. JFK 2.0, who absolutely true, almost like down to a science, except like I said, one strong difference would be the grieving widow seems to be with the state, is what I would say. Seven Sheets writes, boom, been waiting for you to mention data centers. Enough is enough to quote Erica. Tech nerds are trying to conduct a heist of the USA. You are amazing. And thanks to all the citizen journalists who have a conscience, evil and dystopian prayers for the fight, could not agree more. Dayjean writes, I didn't believe any of the Fed slop were chaining to what happened at the White House dinner. I quit watching the news. True journalism is dead and gone. Love you, Candice Christ is king. That is 1000% true. But it's funny that we all said, oh, we're gonna turn off the TV. And we're gonna listen to independent voices. And they're bought too. They are coordinating with surrogates. Who are those surrogates? We should know. Like I said, FOIA request this stuff. There's gonna be more there. We're gonna probably find out who exactly shot that clip of Erica walking out. Was it PR agents? I don't think it was Andrew Colbert. Could it have been the other PR agent Andrew Colbert was with? Matthew Shoup. Matthew Shoup who does PR for Harmeet Dillon. Dillon Law Group, he's close with them. I know Harmeet was sitting with Andrew Colbert. I don't know. I'm just asking legitimate questions. And I think that we need to find the answer to this because this is deep and it's ugly. Vanessa writes, when discourse ends, violence begins. Charlie Kirk, literally the opposite words equal violence. Yeah, we're now being told words equal violence. Yeah, Charlie believed the opposite. When social media pushed hard for me to dismiss Candice as evil, that's when I decided to see for myself, I guess that sigh up backfired, think for yourself. Yeah, now that's why it's so important to talk about these sigh ups and to call them out is because you do start to see the pattern is when too many people are saying the same thing all at once, like a ballroom after a shooting, you go, who's instructing this? And now we know it's the military. The military is sending to comms teams, the con teams are then going out to surrogates and they are coordinating that messaging behind the scenes and amplifying certain things. And I'm sure based on the other points of the email that they are Navy, they're going in there and they're impacting the algorithm. And that's what I keep saying about X. It's very obvious that they can float trends and disappear trends at any moment that they want to. And that's forcing a narrative. So you really do have to steal your mind against it. Potanica writes or Pat Tonica, maybe it is. God bless you, Candice Owens and your family. Thank you, thank you for the support. Janita writes, why is Erica crying more for the stunt than she ever did for Charlie's traumatic death? I think she has a hard time actually crying and producing real tears. I go back always to Elizabeth Lane and what she said about the attributes of a psychopath. And that's why she's having trouble. I mean, she might have fooled Charlie, but she's not fooling the majority of the world. That's that much as obvious. And she's got everything going for her. I mean, all of media has risen to tell us she's a grieving widow, independent commentators are rising to tell us she's a grieving widow and it's not working. So maybe get a new actress. Angelina Jolie's really good. I would have bought it. 100% senior movies. Curious Joel writes, you know that feeling when a four year old stops you and asks you to stop, to watch them do a cartwheel and they fail miserably, that's how all of these Psyops are feeling like, oh, that's cute, so fake, so very gay. Like, yeah, except in the example of the toddler, they're cute, that's exactly right. But with the military, you're just like, man, you gotta get smarter people in there. And I think that's they're having the paramount, not so tactical problem or something. We deserve better Psyops. I just feel like we deserve better Psyops. All the coordination, all the planning, all the operatives on the ground, and they can't pull it off. Erica just goes, like she just, they tell her to go left, she goes left, she goes right, say this, say that, wear this, wear that. Stand like this, stand like that. Like I said, she's just a piece of technology. She's not even something to hate or resent. She's just like, you know, it's like hating or resenting your iPhone, just a piece of hardware. We Not Me writes, I am beyond shook today. I had the exact same dream that Erica, same dream Erica Lane described, oh, Elizabeth Lane, pardon, described about Charlie. It was on January 11th, I was not baptized that day and Charlie was a huge part of my faith journey, so I believed that it was just the emotions of the day. She's talking about Elizabeth Lane, I did a sit down with her. She came here and I did her show. You can pivot over, I think we linked it onto this channel somehow as well, so that you can watch that. And she talked about the dream that she had. And we've been talking about our dreams on this show because it's very strange that they don't want us to believe in our dreams while they're trying to walk us backward into their dystopian one. I'm just not signing up for this, man. I'm not going to sign up for what is so obviously in front of us. It's a shame that Trump proved to be the ultimate Trojan horse that is walking in this technocracy, allowing the military to do what they are doing. He, I guess, has already made his bargain and understands the consequences for his soul. That's what I would say about Trump, it is a shame. Anyway, guys, if you would like to support the show and not listen to Blake Neff and Andrew Colbert at all, which I think we all aspire to not listen to them at all, we do have new merch on our website. So you can get your merch, got our BattleBun merch up there, a yay to free markets. It's the easiest way to support the show. And of course we have our Make America Christian again, hats. Not maga, baka. That's what that's all about. And reminding you also that we have Book Club tomorrow. We're starting my book. Super excited you guys know how excited I am. I'm never gonna get tired of telling you how excited I am that we're doing this book. So you can head to makeamassanwars.com and to purchase the book and join the Book Club. We'll do an intro tomorrow, which begins with my battle with Cardi B, which inspired this book. This book was literally inspired by Cardi B. That's something to be said for that. I love it. We will see you in the Book Club tomorrow. If not, I will see you guys on Monday.