Mundo in the Morning - KCMO Talk Radio 95.7FM & 710 AM

Nathan Willett, KCMO City Councilman and Missouri U.S. Congressional Candidate, On Potential Downtown Stadium For Royals | 4-10-26

7 min
Apr 10, 20268 days ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

Kansas City Councilman Nathan Willett discusses Mayor Quentin Lucas's proposed $600 million public funding package for a $1.9 billion Kansas City Royals stadium at Washington Square Park. Willett raises fiscal concerns about the timing relative to the recent earnings tax vote and advocates for public transparency and voter input before approval.

Insights
  • Public officials are questioning the disconnect between claiming fiscal crisis during tax votes while simultaneously proposing major public expenditures days later
  • State-level incentives (Missouri Show Me Sports Act) are shifting the calculus for local stadium funding decisions by providing hundreds of millions in state support
  • Elected representatives are pushing back on rubber-stamp approvals, demanding detailed analysis of impacts on police/fire budgets and public safety infrastructure
  • Voter approval via ballot measure is being positioned as a legitimacy requirement for major municipal projects, even when council votes could approve them directly
  • Historic preservation concerns (Korean War Memorial relocation) are emerging as secondary but important considerations in major downtown development projects
Trends
Municipal governments using state sports incentive programs to justify local public funding for private sports infrastructureIncreased scrutiny of timing between tax approval campaigns and major spending announcements from city leadershipGrowing demand for direct voter input on major municipal projects rather than council-only approvalIntegration of historic preservation and veteran memorials into downtown redevelopment negotiationsFiscal conservatives on city councils demanding detailed budget impact analysis before approving stadium fundingEntertainment district TIF mechanisms being proposed as primary revenue source for stadium debt servicePost-election spending announcements creating political accountability questions about pre-election fiscal messaging
Companies
Kansas City Royals
Subject of $1.9 billion stadium proposal with $600 million in public funding being debated by city council
People
Nathan Willett
First District councilman discussing proposed Royals stadium ordinance and fiscal concerns on KCMO radio
Quentin Lucas
Proposed $600 million stadium funding ordinance for Kansas City Royals at Washington Square Park
Pete Keatsman
Host of Mundo in the Morning conducting interview with Councilman Willett about stadium proposal
Quotes
"When you don't ask questions, that's when a lot of things may be the devils and the details, as they say, and I want to make sure that the details are good."
Nathan Willett
"I think that the Royals should be scared of a vote. I think that if you make a good argument and talk about it, I think that it could pass."
Nathan Willett
"You never know what comes out of City Hall a week or two after the earnings tax vote."
Nathan Willett
"We got to make sure that this plan works for the city, and there should be questions asked."
Nathan Willett
Full Transcript
At Simply Health, we know that workplace healthcare can feel like. We're currently experiencing a high core volume and you're in a queue. But now's the time to untangle it and go from inaccessible health to Simply Health. Support all employees with 24-7 access to GP and mental health support. Plus pay-as-you-go services. We're simplifying access to workplace healthcare. Simply Health. See why we're different at simplyhealth.co.uk. Benefits depending on product, T's and C's apply. The fund's not done after Monday morning. Hey, it's Kevin Keatsman. Join me for Uncanceled at 10 o'clock right here on KCMO Talk Radio. The big news yesterday from the mayor's office. There will be an ordinance introduced from Quentin Lucas to go ahead with a $600 million redirect of funds to help the Royals build a $1.9 billion stadium at Washington Square Park right next to Union Station and Crown Center. Nathan Willett is a Kansas City, Missouri councilman, first district. He's also running for Congress in the sixth congressional district up in the Northland. He joins us on KCMO. Alright, Nathan, we appreciate you being here. First off, was yesterday the first time you heard about this proposed ordinance from the mayor, or is this something that's been talked about behind the scenes for quite some time? Yeah, well, first of all, good morning, Pete. Happy Friday. This is something that I've heard some things about. I don't know how much of it says it's actually the mayor's ordinance and deal as much of it as the city manager, and then the mayor introduces it and acts like it's what he put together. So I just want to clarify that right off the bat. But I did not see the official proposal until right during council. I heard that that was going to be introduced and nine of my colleagues co-sponsored it, and it takes nine votes to get something through and a pretty good, you could do it same day, but they are sitting in it to committee next week to have some kind of public input. But my main thing here is, you know, as someone who represents the Northland and someone who is fiscally conservative, and I do care about the royals as well, we got to make sure that this plan works for the city, and there should be questions asked. When you don't ask questions, that's when a lot of things may be the devils and the details, as they say, and I want to make sure that the details are good. And I do believe that the people ultimately should be able to decide on a decision like this. Nathan Willis joining us on KCMO. I hate to do it on the air, Nathan. I'm going to ask you to slide five feet to your left or right. There's a little bit of a cell phone break up there. But I want to follow up with you on that and say, OK, we're two days removed yesterday. We were two days removed from the city voters going ahead with the sales or the earnings tax for another five years. And the city comes out and says, hey, if we don't pass the earnings tax, we're broke. There's no cops. There's no fire. There's no nothing. But now we're talking about a $600 million redirect for a baseball stadium. So what exactly is the fiscal situation of Kansas City, Missouri, as you understand it, as a member of city council? Yeah, well, I think that we did OK on the last budget. I did vote against it because it had a lot of junk in there, but we could have gone away with at least 20% of the budget and still been fine in the city. But I'm asking the questions of how does this $600 million redirect affect the police budget? How does it affect the firefighters budget? You're going to talk about a complex going in downtown Kansas City. We're going to make sure it's safe for people to go there. And number one, a lot of my constituents would like to see the K be where they remain for a period of time. Obviously, that's not a decision. But if this is going to happen, there has to be people who are standing up and asking legit questions and not just being rubber stamped on it. So where is this council at when it comes to potentially being divided on this issue? Or do you think the mayor knows he's got the votes to move ahead with this? And that's why the announcement came down yesterday. Yeah, I think that you'll see more in their presentation next week. I think that this exciting proposition, obviously, we want to keep sports teams in our state. But the question is, to what extent? I will say this, the difference between this time around and last time around is you have the show me sports act, which the state of Missouri is going to send hundreds of million dollars to Kansas City. And so it has more incentive for people to vote for something if they were to put it on the ballot. And so I'm confident that if you are transparent with the voters and you put something together and give them the opportunity to weigh in on it, I think something like this would pass. I don't think decisions that this magnitude, like let's talk about the airport. The first time around when they did the airport, that thing failed. They went back to the drawing board. They communicated with constituents, seen what they want. Obviously, we don't like the bathrooms in the new airport. I don't think people would have voted for it if that was the case on the ballot. They knew that ahead of time. But you know that they did go back to the ballot on the airport and then the voters voted for it. I think this is something that they should be doing. I don't think the team, the Royals should be scared of a vote. I think that if you make a good argument and talk about it, I think that it could pass. But I'm someone who's not going to be a rubber stamp on this. I just want to make sure that we are actually doing the role of local government, which is public safety and infrastructure and then supporting our neighborhoods. Do we know, the mayor referenced like there being an entertainment district, you know, kind of a TIF district or whatever, that obviously would redirect monies to pay off a portion of the stadium. Do we know the size, the scope, the boundaries of this district or is that all TBD as far as you know? I'm sure that's TBD. I think that they're confident that they can generate the amount of money in that area. But the other thing I want to tell you, to Pete, that's not talked about that I'm going to introduce a council this next week is there's the Korean War Memorial there at Washington Square Park. And I want to make sure that if we are going to put a baseball stadium in there, we find just as good, if not a better spot to recognize veterans of the Korean War. And I'm going to make sure that we find a spot in the city if that were to happen. That is number one, public and accessible to our veterans. And then number two, a beautiful area that we can have just as nice of a tribute. So I may be looking at some places up in the Northland. But you know, as one member of this council, I can't get to decide everything. But what I can do is push back on a few items to make sure that we are actually doing a role in trying to be a guardrail, even when they try to go off the rails. All right, so what's next? I mean, has the mayor said when this is going to go to a vote of the city council and what details do you have, if any, on that front? Yeah, it could be voted on next week as early as next week. I do think that there might be a parks decision as well, which I think is a less of a controversial item as long as we figure out what we're going to do with the Korean War Memorial. But the bottom line, Pete, like you said, you had that earnings tax vote and then you have announcement like this. It was five years ago when we did the earnings tax vote and the mayor did the defund the police a $42 million reallocation. So you never know what comes out of City Hall a week or two after the earnings tax vote. And so that's why you didn't really see me go raw raw on that as well. Obviously, you want to protect pensions of our first responders. But you know, at the same time, you can't just be acting like police and fire, police and fire, and then a proposal like this could potentially hurt our police officers and firefighters. And so I want to make sure that this proposal does not do that. Nathan Willett, Kansas City Councilman on KCMO. He's also running for Congress in the sixth congressional district up in the Northland. Nathan, thank you as always for the time we appreciate it and have a great weekend. Yeah, you too, Pete. Thanks. You bet. Nathan Willett on KCMO, talk radio. Now it's actually making something, but that's starting to go down, down, down. I love how we can play the fact that inflation has been really high as a positive. But if you're a saver, you know what that means? Silver lining, Joe, silver lining. Afford anything, follow and listen on your favorite platform. Full send golf. You guys know how much I really, really love golf. And I think every week would be dope to post on the golf channel. I want to get a lot of guests on here. Salim's going to take a leap. I'm down to be in it. It's not really worth to play golf. Join the party on the golf course. I was like, let's go to the range. So what are we putting on it? We said 10K, right? 10K? All right. We probably bet more than all the other golf channels, right? 10K, 9-ohls. Those guys bet for like cookies. I feel like I'm going to shank it. This guy's been trading like a Navy Seal when it comes to golf. I'm very, very excited. Are you excited? Yeah. Full send golf. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.