I gave my brother a New York Times subscription. We exchange articles. And so having read the same article, we can discuss it. She sent me a year-long subscription so I have access to all the games. The New York Times contributes to our quality time together. It enriches our relationship. It was such a cool and thoughtful gift. We're reading the same stuff. We're making the same food. We're on the same page. Learn more about giving a New York Times subscription as a gift at nytimes.com. From the New York Times, it's the headlines. I'm Tracy Mumford. Today's Monday, June 15th. Here's what we're covering. I'm not going to say that everybody's going to sing Tune by Ah! tomorrow. It's going to take a little bit of time to learn the ways of peace. But I do think we took a major, major step tonight. After months of negotiations, the US and Iran have announced that they have reached a framework for peace. An agreement that could pave the way for an end to the war. I know that this has been a hard time for a lot of Americans, but we have achieved something great for them. Speaking to Fox News, Vice President J.D. Vance celebrated the deal, which he said will immediately end the US naval blockade on Iran and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, essentially returning things to the status quo before the war began. In a statement on social media, President Trump wrote, quote, The deal came together in a last minute flurry of talks with Iran holding off on finalizing the so-called memorandum of understanding until after midnight Tehran time. According to two Iranian officials, that was because they didn't want it to coincide with Trump's 80th birthday. Both Iran and the US are trying to portray the deal, which includes a 60-day ceasefire, which is a very important part of the deal. They are trying to portray the deal, which includes a 60-day ceasefire, as a victory for their side. Though some of the thorniest issues between them have basically just been pushed off to future talks about a broader agreement down the line. The fact of the matter is that a memorandum of understanding doesn't have any particular enforceable capability. This isn't a peace deal. It's not a nuclear deal. It's more like a table of contents, as one of the president's aides put it to me, for what needs to be negotiated next. David Sanger covers the White House for the times. Yesterday, he spoke with President Trump on the phone for almost a half an hour. What was unusual about the president's call is that as he described and walked me through the nuclear agreements that he believed they were gonna reach, he was basically describing agreements that he wanted to make sound as if they had already been reached. But when pressed, acknowledged that this is all subject to this later and in my view, much more important document, which would be much more like what the Obama administration negotiated 11 years ago. Specifics about whether or not Iran can enrich uranium, whether it has to give up its stockpile of nuclear fuel and so forth. David says that fresh talks about Iran's nuclear program could kick off as soon as Friday when the U.S. Iran framework is expected to be officially signed. One factor that could still reignite the conflict though is Israel's ongoing campaign against the Iran-backed militia Hezbollah in Lebanon. The new ceasefire requires an end to fighting on all fronts, including Lebanon. But Israel was not part of the talks and its national security minister has already stressed that it is not bound by the agreement. David has more about the deal and his conversation with President Trump on today's episode of The Daily. Now, two other quick updates from Washington. I just can't believe that we're at the White House watching UFC fights. Dude, I'm so filled with like testosterone I wanna kick somebody to death. It's crazy. Hours after announcing the agreement with Iran, President Trump sat cage-side for UFC fights on the White House lawn, a spectacle unlike any in the history of the presidency. You want that? You want that? You want that? For the night, the White House was not just the backdrop, but a set for the event. The fighters were filmed walking through it to get to the ring. The audience was packed with cabinet members, Republican lawmakers, and billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg and David Ellison. The whole thing was plastered with the names of corporate sponsors, including Bud Light, Polymarket, and Crypto.com. The event put Trump at the center of a sport that's popular with many young men, and some in the GOP hope it could be a way to capture their enthusiasm ahead of the midterms. Recent polls from the Times and Sienna College have found that Trump's approval rating with young men specifically has fallen by about 10 percentage points in recent months, as his overall approval rating has slipped. Democrats, meanwhile, portrayed the event as a stunt, with Senator Adam Schiff writing that Trump had been focused on the fights, quote, while you're fighting to pay this month's bills. In all, according to a recent poll by Reuters and Ipsos, just 16% of Americans said it was appropriate for Trump to hold the fights at the White House. And over at the Kennedy Center, a different fight unfolded this weekend over the name of the building. Board members of the Kennedy Center voted unanimously to rename it the Trump Kennedy Center. What is your reaction to that? Well, I was honored by this. The board is a very distinguished board. Months ago, members of the center's board, many hand-picked by Trump, arranged to have new signage put up reading the Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts. That set off a lot of backlash, some from the Kennedy family itself, as well as a lawsuit filed by a Democratic lawmaker. Down, kick it down! Overnight on Saturday, hundreds of people gathered to watch as the new letters were taken down to comply with a court order in which a federal judge found that only Congress has the right to rename the center. The whole complex is set to close soon for two years of renovations, which Trump announced after the institution had been rocked by boycotts and cancellations. In Japan, lawmakers are drafting a plan to address a national dilemma. The country is running out of men who can be emperor. Japan has the world's oldest monarchy, with a line of emperors going back to 660 BC. And for hundreds of years, only men have been allowed to hold that title. But the number of eligible heirs has been shrinking steadily. There are currently just three men who could inherit the throne. And one of them is 90 years old. In order to prevent a succession crisis, Japan's legislature is moving forward with a provision that would allow the royals to adopt distant male relatives, adding them to the pool of possible candidates for the largely ceremonial role. There are a number of Japanese families connected to the throne that could be included in this. Many of them had been stripped of their royal status under a post-World War II plan pushed by the US to weaken the monarchy there. According to Japanese news reports, the change could mean that dozens of commoners who've been working everyday jobs in advertising or selling insurance could suddenly become eligible for the throne. But many in Japan think there's an easier solution. Let a woman fill the role. Polls show broad public support for the idea, and the current emperor's daughter, 24-year-old Princess Aiko, is a popular national figure. One expert on Japan's royal family told the Times that if the country continues to exclude women from the throne, that will only hurt the monarchy in the long run, adding that over time, the whole system will become, quote, unsustainable. And finally... Oh, yes! Georana! The world could be a better place The World Cup is well underway. The US came out strong with a 4-1 win over Paraguay. Final score, 7 to Germany, and 1 for Kurosawa. While Kurosawa had a crushing debut in its first-ever appearance in the tournament, getting routed by Germany. And later today, Iran will be in the spotlight. I believe the Iran squad have just landed at Los Angeles International Airport. There had been questions about whether the team would make it to the US, but all is now set for them to play in LA this evening against New Zealand. Now, with everyone's attention on the teams, the Times has also been talking with the experts who are watching the grass. FIFA rules say that every game has to be played on natural living turf, and the fields have to be consistent across all 16 stadiums. So when, say, the French star Kylian Mbappe kicks the ball in New Jersey, it needs to bounce the same way it would in Toronto or Guadalajara. Pulling that off is an enormous feat that has been years in the making. To have just the right grass in just the right conditions, FIFA assembled a crack team of turfologists. Yeah, turfologists. They've done all kinds of tests, even inventing a machine with a 3D-printed foot in a soccer cleat to imitate how a World Cup player cuts hard across the turf. They ultimately put together a custom mix of different grass species to account for the conditions in different stadiums. In many cases, sod for the fields had to be grown off-site and was shipped as far as 1,400 miles in refrigerated trucks to get to the arenas. Now, with the games underway, the work has not ended for FIFA's field management experts. They are watching all the matches, but not for the scores. They're keeping tabs on the grass from the FIFA Tournament Operations Center in Miami. They're looking out for slips, bad bounces, or just anything that doesn't look quite right. Those are the headlines. I'm Tracey Mumford. We'll be back tomorrow with the latest on the G7 Summit in France, where President Trump is set to meet with America's allies as tensions between the US and Europe flare.
