Artemis II’s AVATAR and a sungrazing comet

Organships on their way to the moon and a sun-grazing comet just days from Parahelion. This week on Planetary Radio. I'm Sarah L. Ahmed of the Planetary Society, with more of the human adventure across our solar system and beyond. This may well be the week that humans leave Earth orbit for the first time in half a century, but we won't know until the moment that Artemis II takes to the sky. Lisa Carnell, who's the director of NASA's Biological and Physical Sciences Division, joins us to talk about Avatar. It's an experiment flying on Artemis II that uses tiny chips grown from astronaut cells to study how deep space affects human biology. And then Alain Maury, who's an astronomer and founder of the MAPS Survey in Chile, discusses the sun-grazing comet his team discovered earlier this year. And what might happen when it passes within 162,000 kilometers of the sun on April 4th? Then Bruce Betts, our chief scientist at the Planetary Society, joins me for what's up to let you know how you can observe this upcoming comet. That is, if it survives, it's close past by the sun. If you love Planetary Radio and want to stand formed by the latest space discoveries, make sure you hit that subscribe button on your favorite podcasting platform. By subscribing, you'll never miss an episode filled with new and awe-inspiring ways to know the cosmos and our place within it. On April 1st, 2026, Artemis II enters its next set of launch windows. This is the moment that NASA has been building toward for years, the first crewed learner mission since Apollo 17 more than 50 years ago. Whether the crew is already lifted off or launch day is still ahead of them by the time you hear this, one thing is definitely certain. The science that's riding aboard the Orion capsule is about to make history. This is part two of our look inside the human science experiments flying on Artemis II. Last week I spoke with Dr. Steve Platz, the chief scientist of NASA's Human Research Program. We spoke about the broader effort to monitor and protect astronaut health on this mission, but today we're going to be focusing on one of the most ambitious biology experiments ever sent to space. It's called Avatar, not like the last airbender or the navi, but Avatar stands for a virtual astronaut tissue analog response. Basically, scientists have taken cells directly from the Artemis II astronauts and used them to grow tiny, functional replicas of human tissue. In this case, bone marrow, inside devices that are roughly about the size of a USB drive. These are called organ chips, and they work by mimicking how living tissue actually behaves inside the body. The Avatar chips are flying alongside the crew on this 10-day journey around the moon, so they'll be experiencing the same deep space radiation and microgravity that the astronauts will. When the mission returns from the moon, researchers are going to be able to compare what happened to the chips in space against identical chips that stayed here on Earth. This will give scientists the most detailed look yet at how deep space affects human biology at the cellular level. The person leading the division at NASA that's making all of this happen is our guest today, Dr. Lisa Carnell. She's the director of NASA's Biological and Physical Sciences Division. Lisa got her PhD from Duke University where she studied stem cell behavior. Then she spent years at NASA working on radiation countermeasures before she stepped into her current leadership role overseeing the agency's biological and physical sciences portfolio, including Avatar. Hi, Lisa. Thanks for joining me. Hi. Thank you for having me. Your career has been so interesting. You've studied everything from stem cell differentiation at Duke and led radiation countermeasures work at NASA's Human Research Program, and now you're directing NASA's Biological and Physical Sciences Division. It's almost like all the little bits of your career came together and specifically led toward Avatar. What has it been like seeing all this come together in a single experiment that is now going to be flying around the moon? Oh, my gosh. It's so hard to put into words how incredibly exciting it is in this moment in time. As you said, every one of these elements and aspects of my career has built up to this moment. It's really funny too. In graduate school, I designed and built my own device, if you will, like a 3D version that would help to coax the stem cells into nerve cells in a 3D format. If you saw a picture of it, you would just smile and laugh. We'd come a long way. They're so beautiful and eloquent now, and Avatar is one of those. I look back at the history of where I came from back then and where we are now, and it's just the way that we are moving forward in medicine and how we're going to be able to help people here on Earth and on the ground and in space. It's just the most incredible feeling. That's all I can say. I love that I get to be a part of this here now. I keep sounding like a broken record about this, but the amount that we've learned in the past few decades is absolutely startling. I can't even imagine what we're going to be doing in 100 years, especially if we can use technologies like Avatar and this organ on a chip device kind of technology in combination with space exploration to accelerate this kind of research. I can't even imagine what's going to happen. I know. We have so many big plans for this science and technology. On Artemis II, this is the first of its kind. This is the first time that we've ever sent organ chips out beyond the Van Allave belts. We're matching them to the crew members, which is incredibly exciting itself. Being able to do that and we validate these models, and now we have confidence. Think about what doors that opens. We can now take these models and we could send them out to deep space ahead of time if we knew who the crew members were going to be. We could understand what's going to happen to each one individually. We could create personalized medical kits for them to make sure that maybe Victor's more sensitive to radiation than Christina or Jeremy. Just make sure that we can address each one just to make sure that we bring our astronauts back healthy. That is the ultimate goal. We want to ensure that as we send them out into deep space that we have given them all of the best possible benefits that we can to get them home safe and healthy. Astronauts take on so much risk when they go up there. The last thing we want to do is put them at unnecessary risk, especially as we try for longer deep space missions. Something like Avatar is very useful. For people who are unfamiliar with this kind of organ chip technology, why is this such a powerful research tool for understanding specifically the impact of deep space on human bodies? These are organ chip models that really recapitulate and mimic the organ inside the body itself. For example, with the heart, it beats like a heart, literally like it does inside of your body or along it breathes. In this case, we're using bone marrow. I get a lot of questions why, because bone marrow is very radio sensitive. It's also linked back to the immune system. We always see immune function changes almost immediately when the crew go to space. You hear a lot about that in the news, about even going to a space station. Thinking about, if we send a bone marrow model that's radio sensitive, we can really understand the impact of the deep space radiation on that, correlate that to each of the individual astronauts, and then also understand where the impact began to alter the immune function right there as it starts in the bone marrow. It's a really beautiful experiment, but like you said, these organ chip models are being used everywhere. I would love to say, NASA really paved this path. We paved the path for space, but these organ chip models are being used worldwide. They're really popular because they're human. They translate well. The Food and Drug Administration uses them now. You can replace them and they will take that data for drug toxicity testing and countermeasure efficacy because animal models haven't been shown to translate well to humans. We're leaning in on all of the data and science that's been paving this path on the ground here across the world and taking advantage of that to really help our astronauts and understanding how we bring them home safely. The applications for even just pulling away from animal testing is one thing, but I think about all the people with cancers or autoimmune diseases. And as it kind of stands, in a lot of cases, we give them treatments we know will help most people, but we don't know how they're going to affect their bodies until they're actually experiencing it. So if we can test that on their actual cells beforehand, imagine how many lives could be saved. It's wild. How prevalent is this technology in that kind of research currently? Oh my gosh, it's groundbreaking and it is the future. I consider this technology to really be the future of medicine and how we pave the path forward for individualized treatment or we call it personalized health. So wouldn't it be great if you went to the doctor's office and you were diagnosed with some sort of a cancer or a disease and they were able to draw blood from you or take a sample of a tumor and be able to identify the exact treatment that's going to work for you, not for the person next to you, but what works on your specific ailments. So that's where we're going with this technology and we're really leaning into it. That's happening all over the world. We have researchers at almost every institution, I have to say, working on this for cancer, understanding how cancer progresses, metastasis, and what kind of treatments we can address. But then also aging and age-associated diseases. Neurodegeneration is huge. Can we use these to really understand the early stages and what kind of treatments might work before we actually give them to people? In the case of the people who are flying on Artemis II, how are we actually collecting the bone marrow cells and how are they processed for this? So I love that because we're not using bone marrow. So we actually did a blood draw on the crew and they were fantastic about it, by the way. And enthusiastic, I have to say. So the crew, we did the blood draw. We did a collection called apheresis where it collects cells in this collar and then the actual blood is basically put back into the astronauts and the platelets that come out of it and then the cells that are captured, the stem cells that are captured inside of this collar are used to create the bone marrow models. So painless, it's about an hour process and we can create a model from each of the crew members that simple. Yeah, it's much better than having to directly draw the bone marrow from their backs. I've heard from people I know who have undergone that process that it is quite painful. So knowing that we can find a way to do this en masse without actually hurting anyone, just taking some of their blood, that's absolutely amazing. I know it's so interesting because in the blood, you have a lot of peripheral blood mononucleosites, they're called PDMCs, floating around. And back in the early 2000s, they were able to show how they can take cells and convert them into what we call induced pluripotent stem cells and use that technology to then create any kind of cell type that you want. So from a blood draw, I could take a blood draw from you, simple. And just like you do in a doctor's office, take a blood draw, sort out those PDMCs, create your very own personalized organ chip model. Say we wanted to create the brain, we would literally use the right growth factors to generate a brain model of you from your blood cells or a heart or any other type of tissue. We can then take that tissue model and then use it to actually understand a disease progression and aging or in this case, the exposure of radiation and microgravity. We mentioned this earlier that this is the first time personalized organ chips that are matched directly to the actual crew are going to be flying beyond low earth orbit. What is that personalized aspect add scientifically that a generic cell sample couldn't? Yeah, so it goes back to, I think, exactly what you're saying is that people are individual. So even if you take a Tylenol or some sort of an aspirin or therapeutic, it affects you different than say your mother or your child. So the individual part is really important because nobody, no two people respond the same. And so this allows us to really hone in at the same time. Rather than doing the stepwise where we do a pooled experiment of just random cells that go up there and understand, we leaped and did a combination of the individualized aspect coupled with the whole notion of the pooled element. That makes sense. And so now we can really say, okay, I'm seeing these changes and Victor, but I don't see this changing Christina or Jeremy or Reed. What was it about that that we saw that maybe it means there's more radio sensitivity or maybe if we need to bolster their immune system before they go. So it really allows us to hone in on how we protect each individual as they go rather than trying to do one of those like they do now in the doctors and mass, right? Everybody takes the same dose for something. This is really getting down to where medicine should be going in the future. I imagine though that trying to keep a group of cells on a chip alive on Earth is a little easier. You can interface with it. What are the biggest kind of logistical challenges in keeping these chips alive to the moon and back for 10 days? Oh my goodness. What a great question. That was, I have to say, that was an absolutely amazing engineering feat taken on by Space Hango, our partner. They have been flying tissue chips and organ chips to the International Space Station for some time. They have an autonomous system that they've developed that is continuously perfusing these like your blood going through. So it's running through these organ chips. But to be able to do this inside of Orion and make it so that we just return it home and it lasts for the entire duration really took a lot of incredible talent and engineering on their side through the pumping mechanisms. We needed to have power associated with this to have the pumps running and maintain the thermals. So your body likes a certain temperature, right? So did the organ chips. They like the same temperature as the body. So how do we maintain that thermal environment? And they had to design and develop the capability of having our own battery pack and power in there. And they did this. It was really a quite impressive feat that they accomplished. But it's all contained and it's continuously perfused. There is bags of media inside. Each chip has its own bag that rotates and perfuses through it as if it's your own blood going through and super excited about the results that will come from that. Yeah, we're going to need it not just to go to the moon, but I'm thinking long term if we're going to be trying to send humans to Mars or at least test our potential astronaut cells in space before we send them to Mars, we're going to need those to last a little more than 10 days. What do you think is like the uppermost bound on how long we can keep these chips alive before we have to really worry about it? Oh my goodness. I love this question. And you know, it's funny that you, because I have a lot of people think about the fact that we really have to have that longevity in the organ chip itself. We were thinking ahead several years back. So within NASA, we partnered with many other government agencies, NIH, FDA, and we all came together and funded nine different institutions and different types of organ systems to demonstrate that they could maintain their health and have sensors incorporated for a minimum of six months. And so that duration would get us a really decent amount of time in the deep space environment. Most of the organoid systems and tissue chip systems only last for a few weeks, but you know, now most of the performers we've had because of when we issued this are almost done and have reached that six month mark that you're talking about. We're going to send them out. Like you said, deep space. We absolutely need to ensure that they're going to live long enough. What's really cool, believe it or not. And honestly, I was going to dig into this why, but brain organoids themselves have been shown to live for years, literally. And so we were really digging into why and how functional are they? Do they maintain all of the physiological and functionality? And so that's one that we're really leaning in towards right now. Well, that's really interesting. Why would they last that long? There's so much we can learn about the human body through this. It's absolutely mind blowing. But I think about this all the time. People have asked me, you know, would I go to Mars if I had the opportunity to do so? Right. And I'm going to be the crazy person that says yes, I would absolutely love to do that. But there's so many logistical issues in the way. And one of the biggest ones is going to be this radiation shielding. As people go out into deep space, it's going to take a lot to protect them. And we've had ways of creating like analog dummy bodies in the past. We even put some on Artemis one, right? But I really want to know that we're going to be able to test this on biological, actual human biological substances and organs before we actually send humans. And this gives us a real way to test this. I mean, this is far future, but I would love to see this kind of thing happen. Well, I don't think it's as far in the future as you might think. You know, we've already been working on this notional aspect because we need to know before we go. You know, like you said, we are really leaning into sending humans to Mars. And there's so much we don't know. We haven't even really studied biology outside the man-mallow belts, right? We don't even know what that radiation is going to do, let alone now send humans out there. So this tool right here, having this capability of sending these human organoid or organ chip models out ahead of time is going to give us so much valuable insight and information before we send the humans out there. We have been working on a mission concept that would actually send human organoid models out to Mars would allow us to obtain in real time data on the system from the effects of the microgravity and radiation during transit. And we have chosen a model that would actually live long enough for us to obtain data on the surface of Mars. How cool is that? It's so cool. And we are not talking, you know, decades down the road. This is something that we are prepared to do in a very short turnaround timeline. So if you can imagine how powerful this would be to really start to enable, you know, as many people talk about, we want to be an interplanetary species. I believe this is one of the first steps we need to take to understand that. And then we can build on it from there. But really powerful science and technology. Another thing I really think about as we go out into space is the fact that we're very limited in how much mass we can send up in each one of these situations. A few years ago, I was at NASA's Innovative Events Concept Symposium, and they were talking about the issue of sending medicine with astronauts to the ISS and how troubling it is because you can't send every drug ever invented. So you either have to be able to save them if they encounter a medical issue, which we saw recently on the ISS, or we have to anticipate their medical issues ahead of time. So is this the case where we can test all this kind of stuff, create like a personalized medical kit just for them and make sure that they'll be safe personally on their way to Mars? Absolutely. That is one of the long-brage goals, right? So understanding that sending these out ahead of time, which we're really poised to do in the very near future, send it out ahead of time, get that biological data back. So what's happening if we have a radiation damage marker in there or other effects we're seeing? How do we now prepare the right medical kit for treatment of the crew members? So again, as you just mentioned, like a personalized medical kit that ensures that each astronaut has what they need individually to ensure that they stay healthy on these exploration missions. You know, I'll be honest, I think this is going to be important for these long duration stays on the lunar surface as well. I mean, return trips are not that quick, right? It's a lot faster than Mars, granted. But, you know, if we're going to go and live on thrive on the lunar surface for extended periods of time, we need to be leaning into that as well and understanding how we ensure astronaut health and safety for the duration of the mission. Then after they return home, right? Because when they come back, they want to continue to thrive and have, you know, the robust lifestyle that they want to enjoy with their families. And, you know, we want to ensure that we have done everything in our power to make that happen. You're so right. This would be useful for any permanent settlement we put on the moon. I think this is one more example of why people should be excited about Artemis 2. I know so many people are just waiting for that moment that we see humans bouncing on the surface of the moon again. But I think people should take the time to really learn about the kind of science like Avatar that we're putting on Artemis 2. It might give them a much deeper appreciation for why we're taking the stepwise process as we return people to the lunar surface. I would agree. I mean, the Artemis 2 mission, you know, and I will tell you, I love this mission because, you know, the number one priority is really checking out Orion, how the crew interact with that, the vehicle and systems, the actual rocket itself, and all of the integration of that. And so what's really amazing and what I love about NASA is that we said, OK, you know what, we're doing this. And the important part is really understanding how the vehicle and systems integrate for the crew member. But you know what, guys, we have some space. Let's use every aspect we can to do amazing science on top of all of this other critical activity that we need to check out the spacecraft. So I mean, NASA is one of the most amazing places to be because we maximize every inch we can and every dollar that we can in order to accomplish the most science. And so I love that we were actually able to be part of this mission. They have a lot of priorities, but they were able to embrace science and ensure that we had a space on there to be part of it. I did want to mention, too, you know, going back to your personalized medicine part. One thing I really I always reflect on Jeremy Hansen did a video. And in one of his videos, he actually mentioned the avatar. And he said, you know, really, it's like there are eight astronauts going, you know, there's an avatar of each of us riding along. And they really valued that this is for them, right? We're doing the science, but this is really all about them and that they really embraced it and appreciate it. It's just really means that much more to us. So really, really grateful for the opportunity through NASA to do this. I'm just going to have to give each and every one of those chips some cute little nickname derived from the astronaut names. I love that. That's a great idea. And that has something that we've done yet, but I will make a note. Here's little Chip Christie and little Chip Jerry. Wow, I love it. You know, when we talk about the value of this science and the capability, this is something that's being really embraced worldwide. You know, this is adopted internationally. People are really working hard to advance the science capability so that we can lean towards this more improved precision health for people right here on the ground. And what's powerful is that in our study going around the moon, we have government agency partners like Barta and NIH that are saying, you know, we are really interested in what happens at the individual level. And so we're excited that NASA is doing this and we want to be part of it. Yeah, it speaks to the fact that collaborations between all these different facets of human knowledge, whether it's government or industry or research, academic institutions. When we can all collaborate together, effectively, the things that we can accomplish are absolutely just absolutely mind blowing. And this is one of the peak examples of the ways that space exploration not only enhances us through our ability to know more about the universe, but literally makes our lives better down here on earth. It's a perfect example of why when people learn more about space exploration, they understand why it's so important for the future of humanity. Oh, I could not agree more. And do you know what I love as you were talking about this collaboration angle which, you know, is something we do so much of in our division in biological and physical sciences. But one thing I have such a great appreciation for with our administrator now, he really leads into this. So administrator Isaac Mann has really been emphasizing that we should be partnering more, collaborating more, whether it's like you said, whether it's more with industry and bringing in other government agency partners, because these are big missions. These are big lofty goals for our country, for the world, and we can't do it alone. And so I love his lens on that and that, you know, we're able to demonstrate that through Avatar. So thank you for highlighting that. And thank you for coming on the show to talk about this. There are so many interesting things going on with Artemis too. And I wish we had time to explore each and every one of them. But Avatar is one that I really, really wanted to highlight because I believe that this is one of those future technologies that could really help us. So thank you to you and everyone who is working on this. It could help so many people down here on earth. Absolutely. Thank you so much for having us on the show so that we can share more about Avatar and just go Artemis. Go Artemis. Good luck on the way to the launch when it happens. We wish the crew on board and everybody who's been working on these things, all the luck. Thank you again. Thanks, Lisa. We'll be right back after the short break. Hello, this is Jen Vaughn, your new CEO of the Planetary Society. I am deeply honored to be leading such an extraordinary organization. And one of the very first things I want to do while I get started is to get out to meet you, our members in person. That's why I'm hitting the road for our 2026 member roundtable tour, a series of small members only gathering where we can sit down together face to face. I want to hear what's on your mind, your questions, your ideas and what matters most to you. And while we're together, I'll also give you a preview of the Planetary Society's new five year strategic vision. Our first stop will be Tempe, Arizona on Saturday, April 11th and we'll be continuing now into Washington, DC, the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, New York, Toronto and more throughout the year. We're keeping these gatherings small so space is limited. Register today at planetary.org slash roundtable. I can't wait to meet you. I'll be honest, I'm going to be on the edge of my seat this whole week, not just because of what's happening with Orion and the Artemis 2 crew. But as it turns out, this is also a remarkable week for a completely different space reason. As I record this, there is a comet that is hurtling toward the sun. And whether or not it survives that close pass by our star, might mean a lot for next week's observing. Most of the world's serious asteroid and comet hunting takes place in the Northern Hemisphere. Large surveys sweep the sky night after night. But in the Southern Hemisphere, that task of hunting for these near earth objects has classically fallen on a small number of Southern observers, one of whom is Alain Maury, our next guest. Alain is a French astronomer based in San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, one of the driest and darkest places on earth. That's where he runs the maps program. Working with his collaborators, George Atard, Daniel Parrot and Florian Signore, Alain and his team scan the southern sky for near earth objects. These are asteroids and comets whose orbit brings them close to our planet. As of early 2026, maps has discovered 335 near earth asteroids and eight comets. Their discovery rate for any O's or near earth objects is the highest of any non professional, non NASA funded observatory in the world. The Planetary Society has supported their work through two gene shoemaker near earth object grants. That's our program that funds amateur and small observatory astronomers that are doing planetary defense work. With that funding, Alain purchased four new cameras for the survey. Two of them are already online and the other two are being integrated into operations, which is going to expand their survey even further. And then on January 13th, 2026, the maps program detected a faint, fuzzy object. It's extended coma of outgassing ice indicated that it was a comet. Within days, it was officially designated C 2026 A1 maps. But what made this discovery remarkable wasn't just that it was a comet. It was where that comet came from and where it was headed. Comet maps is a Croix Sun Grazer. That puts it in one of the most dramatic families of comets in the solar system. The Croix group is named for a 19th century German astronomer named Heimlich Croix. He noticed that there are certain spectacular comets, ones like the great comet of 1843 and 1882 that shared this nearly identical orbit. It turned out that they, along with many other bodies, are all fragments of a single enormous comet that broke apart ages ago. Its pieces are strung out along the same path in space, falling toward the sun one by one across the centuries. On April 4th, comet maps will pass within 162,000 kilometers of the sun's surface. That's about a third of the distance from the Earth to the moon. Because comet maps was discovered further from the sun than any other Croix Sun Grazer before it, more than 300 million kilometers out with nearly 82 days before perihelion, which is its closest pass by the sun. That lead time has allowed astronomers worldwide to study it as it brightens and evolves. Early indications suggest that it might actually have a nucleus large enough to survive the journey past the sun. And if it does, and I know that's a big if, it could become bright enough to see without a telescope and potentially even visible to the naked eye during the daytime, just days after perihelion. Alan Murray joins us now from the Otacama Desert in Chile. Thanks for joining me, Alan. Thank you. You know, as with many astronomers, I know that you're a night owl and I thank you for taking the time to talk to me in broad daylight. Mm hmm. Now, I keep telling people I love my job, but if I wanted to start working early in the morning, I probably wouldn't become an astronomer. Well, the thing is, you have to be there. The thing most astronomers are, you know, have office working hours and when they observe, it means they send a lot of paperwork to request observing time and then and then ever see telescopes. Then some people like me, yes, we are at the feet of the telescopes and we work during the night mostly. So right now it's like a local time is like four o'clock in the afternoon. For a normal person, that would be in like seven o'clock in the morning. I'm starting my day. Everyone knows that space people really love their acronyms. But as I was looking into your maps program, I realized that the acronym is actually named for your different team members. So what does map stand for? And how did your team come to work together, even though you live in places all around the world? When I started my business, I didn't have the money to buy telescopes and camera and so on. The truth is it costs money. There is no surprise. Okay. When I think started to go a little bit better, I said, okay, let's see what we can do. I started a survey, but using like the typical software, like most of the other survey used, that mean you make a field, another one, another one, another one, again, again, again, and you detect the moving objects there. The type of software was invented in 1982. So it's like antiquity for computers. Okay. But see a lot of people work like that. Okay. But good for them. And I thought, you know, there had to be better ways. Then there is a group at JPL around Mike Schaue who started to develop this technique of synthetic tracking where basically if the object goes slowly, it stays on the same pixel during the exposure. Life is beautiful. But if it goes, then it's going to go from one pixel to one pixel. And in the end, it stays a very short time on the same pixel. And your detection is not very good. So the idea is to make very short exposure and you follow the object like this so that in the end, all the light of the object stays on the same pixel and you get too much deeper magnitude. You see fainter objects. The problem is when you want to recover an object that you know the motion and everything, that's perfect. If you search for an accelerate, you don't know if it goes like this, like this, like this. If it moves this way, this way, this way. And so all the technology came together around 2015, starting in 2015. You know, it's really a convergence of hardware things. First, Celestron, so from Torrance, California, Taiwan actually. Right now they have been bought by Taiwan. They started to make wide field telescopes, which really allowed to cover a lot of sky. Then people started to develop CMOS cameras. So CMOS cameras are, at least for the amateur, much more sensitive. They read almost instantly. The very early cameras we had, you made an exposure. You had to wait 45 seconds for the camera to be read. So you lose a lot of time. And then we started to have GPU cards by Nvidia in order to make a lot of, you know, computing things. And then, you know, going on YouTube and so on, there was a review about the Raza telescope that we are using. I commented that I was using them to search for accelerate. Then Daniel Parrot, who works in Oklahoma City, contacted me and say, I'm just writing a software and so on. Now it's very good because I've started to, these are computing boards. You need to have a special programming language to parallelize everything. So I've started to read the book and started to make some programs and so on. And then suddenly I had somebody who had the program working. So we started to talk together and so on. And in my old astronomy club in Antibes, so most people will know, maybe if they know a little bit of Southern France, it's Nice can, where there is a can festival on TV is just in between. Okay. So I used to work in the, in this area and I used to, you know, go to this club and so on and so on. So I made a conference about searching for asteroid and so on. And then George Attar, who is the A of maps. So Moe, Attar Parrot. And so at first it was the map program and then Florian with another computer with from the same club joined us. And so that's called, it's called maps. The thing is it came progressively during the pandemic. We had, I had more time anyway. We started to develop all the software and there is a huge amount of software. That means first you have to have a software that move the telescopes and setting the fields and do the observation and so on and so on. Then there is a software to take the pile of observation and calculate all the vectors. That means what I just told you is that we, we stack the images like it, but you don't know the motion of the asteroid, the length. We do like 30,000 stacking of 36 exposures and each of them is 120 megabytes. So it's like a huge amount of data. That's a lot of data. Really the type of thing that could have not have been done like 10 years ago. Then when you have the observation when Tico tracker, that's the software that Daniel developed, we, you would need to see if the object is known. You need to calculate the orbit. You need to know the probability that it's a nearest object. You have a software, you know, have a button and you prepare the email to be sent to the Minor Planet Center. You have a confirm button because when the object is like obviously a bright object, it exists. There is no doubt that it's there. We can send directly to the Minor Planet Center. When it's really faint at the limit, it could be like some pixels that doing some tricks. So we send the observation to another bigger telescope that I have here. And so if there are three observation, the other ones who should find it in the same line. So then when we have the confirmation, then we know it's a faint object, but it's real. So there is a lot of software to be written. I'm like most astronomers, I learned programming because I had two, but I was not taught programming and so on and so on. And so the software we have now is much more reliable. And it works, it works alone. And that's very important because, you know, if you're paid to do that, you can be there all the time. If you're not paid, it's a lot, a lot better. The, you know, the dome opens alone, observes alone. The reduction is done automatically and so on. Then we just have to check like every half an hour if there is something new. The software, Daniel's software, Tico Tracker. We were among the first, you know, heavy users, I would say. And now it has become really the standard program. And even a lot of professionals use this software. It's really very good because Daniel is very good as well. Now, the thing is, if you scan in the ecliptic, you can detect like thousands of known asteroids. You might have like a hundred fake detection, a node detection. And in there you can have like one, two, three, four nearest objects. Of course, the very big programs, the ones financed by NASA were using like 1.5, 1.8 meter telescopes to go much fainter and they can discover like 20 new nearest asteroids, but they miss a lot. And the point is when you have one single camera like we have, like the Monclement Survey has, you go like this, like this, you don't miss anything. When you have a matrix camera like Panstar, like the LSSC, if they ever work one day has, you have a lot of interstices and you may lose things. They also use CCD, which today is really old technology. And CCDs work with charge transfer. So if you have a one bad pixel, all the other pixels behind are bad. You are kept, you have a lot of bad columns. And then progressively, your detector becomes less and less efficient. CMOS, so the newer technology, the pixels are read one by one. So if there is a dead pixel, it's just one dead pixel. So the image quality is much better with the newer technology. That unfortunately, all the new, you know, the big programs do not use and good for us. So that's, that's a thing. And so we started, you know, to, it was very funny because we made some tests with Tico and so on. And then we discovered an asteroid and we say a nearest asteroid. And it was like, wow, we were lucky. And then we started to discover more and more and more. And in the end, well, you have the big programs, you know, so in Arizona, they use a 1.5 meter, 2.2 meter telescope. Panstar has two telescopes of 1.8 meter. But right now, weather has been quite bad in Hawaii. Seems like there's been a lot of floods and stuff. Then there are lesser programs like Atlas. So Atlas uses also small telescope, 20 inch, 550 centimeter. There are four of them in different regions of the world. They tend to cover the whole sky. But then because they do that, they don't go quite deep in magnitude. So we cover less sky, but we go one magnitude further. So we, there are things we find they don't find and reverse. Yeah. And your team is outperforming many of the professional programs with much larger telescopes. But you also received two of the Planetary Society's Shoemaker and Your Earth Object grants, which are helping you expand your fleet of telescopes. And I wanted to ask how that funding has changed the capability of the MAPS program? A lot. Now, clearly, the thing is, early CMOS camera, I didn't say, don't talk about this. We started to develop a lot of problem where the camera would not work and so on and so on. And so the Planetary Society just came right in time to have new cameras while the others were sent, were sent to repair to China. But so right now, two of these cameras are used. The problem is you have cameras, you need a telescope, you need the PC with the GPU and you need electricity. And so the cameras were very useful. But in the meantime, I had to join the money to build the other things. So now I'm really ready. Everything should work very soon. And we should go from four to eight cameras because the other cameras came were repaired next month. We should start to use the full system. But no, clearly, it's a game changer. Even before these new cameras that you got in part through the help of the Planetary Society, you made a discovery recently that is beginning to hit the news. And I think may become a bigger news story in the coming weeks, depending. But your team recently discovered this comet C-2026A1 maps, which I'm just going to call comet maps going forward for ease. But it's a type of comet. It's a it's a Croix Sun Grazer, sometimes known as a kamikaze, or as Americans would say, a kamikaze comet. What makes this upcoming comet so special? First, comets are a pain in the neck. An asteroid, you calculate the orbit, you know where it's going to be. You can calculate probability of impacts and so on. In fact, I was doing a special tour for a person who worked at JPL with an amateur astronomer. So we have special tour for amateur astronomer. I mean, the normal tour we talk about constellation and stuff and so on. Amateur astronomers know all that. They want to use we have a 45 inch telescope. They want to observe the 12,000 object and so on. I finished with him. He came here. I said, just a moment. I checked the computer and there was like that thing was like a little bit fuzzy. OK. And that's a comment. So I showed him, you know, it looks like we have a comet. He said, oh, so it was quite excited also. But the thing is you have a comet. That's it. Then it takes three, four, five days to get the orbit. And then we started to see that it was part of this Croix group. The Croix group, I mean, the Croix was a Einrich Croix. Was a 19th century astronomer who studied the former comets. And he discovered that a lot of the very, very bright comet had the same orbital characteristics. That means when you measure an orbit of something, you have to define six numbers. One is the size of the orbit. The eccentricity is like how circular or elongated is the orbit and the inclination in the solar system. And all these comets have an inclination of one hundred and forty four degrees. When you have an orbit like that, you have a single point. You can calculate quite a lot of very different orbits. So it's very uncertain what the object is. You know, you have a comet. That's it. But no, most of the time we have discovered seven comets before. And all these comets were eighteenth magnitude going away. So they don't make the news. OK. And so the second day we had 90 degrees of inclination. And then more observation were added because it's really a community of people who are following all these discoveries. And we ended up on a forty four. Then there are people who started to get the exciting. OK, the thing is whether or not we're going to have like the super duper comet of the year and so on or the century comet, you know, and people make extrapolations, OK, models and so on. And models were allowed. Some models were completely ridiculous, giving a magnitude of minus 40. The sun is minus 27. The comet minus 40 means it's the end of the world. OK. So the model was stupid, OK, clearly. But the brightness of the comet depends of the closeness, you know, the distance from the earth, because if it's far away, it's faint. If it's close to you, it's, you know, in 1996, we had a comet called Yakutake. That was a really small comet, but it came very close to the earth. And for a few nights, it was like, wow, like, you know, 90 degrees in the sky was very impressive. The second thing is, of course, closer to the sun. It gets hotter. It has more activity. It outgasses and much more. We saw the comet getting brighter, brighter, brighter. One of the good things is that it was the first comet of this group that we discovered so far away, so much in advance. And we could observe how the comet is evolving and so on and so on. What it outgasses compared to the temperature and so on and so on. Then it's going to go close to the sun and we are still, you know, we are two weeks from Perilion. That means it's going to go very, very close to the sun. It's going to be very hot. OK. And so one scenario is the comet just like disappears. One scenario is it emits a lot of gas. The head of the comet disappears, but there is still a tail that you can see a couple of days later or it survives. And then you have like gas, super comet and everything. But still it will be only observed and mostly observable in the in the southern hemisphere. So right now we are like two weeks away from the close approach to the sun. And we still don't know what's going on. But so this comet is even if it just dies, it will have been a lot of fun. The comet was observed by the James Webb Telescope. And so that tells you it's very important because you don't get observing time on the James Webb for like like so-so observation. And it was the first time we could see a comet like that very far away. The thing that James Webb cannot. Well, it's it's good. Cannot observe very close to the sun. They are not stupid. They don't want to burn the telescope, you know. And so it was limited. We could observe the comet till the ninth of February. And so some astronomers, the PI is from Flaksa from the Royal Observatory, Kishen Zong. It's been an exciting time. OK, where the nothing will be very exciting or just like we will see. Time will tell. The comets are like that. Comets are pain in the neck because you do. You cannot predict how it's going to work. You don't know. The fun part is like to know that, you know, it was a comet which in year three and minus 662 was observed by Plato and pieces of it have been observed. It's a long family of comets and so on. Also, they were very interesting scientific papers coming out of the comet. The one I like the most was by Zenex Sekanina. So he works at JPL and the guy is like the reference, you know, the guy who knows, you know, and is 90 years old, he's publishing. I mean, wow, you know, very impressive. After you discovered this, a lot of people kind of assumed that was a fragment of this great comet of 1106, right? And then you, because you were able to with technology, learn a bit more about its trajectory and because of the long time that we have to actually observe it before it passes the sun, you were able to figure out that it might actually be a fragment of an even older comet. Can you talk a little bit more about this family of comets and what we think the origin of this body might actually be? Well, one of the one of the things is, in fact, you can play with that. You go to the nearest object confirmation page. You see, you take whatever object that just has been discovered. You look for the orbital elements and they are very, very, very wild. OK, what I told you, you can calculate. You know, if you have a single point, you can calculate a lot of different orbits. Most people believe and I would, you know, I think Zenexekanina knows what he's talking about. It's a comet that was that came a very big comet, like a hundred kilometer large that came close to the sun in minus 362. So it said that plateau observed it and so on. And then, of course, it fragmented. It's kind of fun because the Soho telescope has discovered more than five thousand comets of the same group. But of course, very small stuff, one meter, two meter, five meter. But you will see them coming from the same direction. And so basically that big comet spread out. But even today, you know, there's still some friction about the peri-albed, it looks like it's 1900 years or something like that. But whether or not this thing survives, you guys are still doing an amazing amount of work. You you are absolutely blowing away most of the other amateur astronomy surveys and with some really clever techniques and with a lot of love. I can tell that you absolutely adore what you're doing. Yeah, I do it because it's fun. I'm not a masochist. If it was a pain in the neck, I would do something else. No, it's really fun. It's really fun to find things. In a way, we are quite surprised that we were doing so good. And I'm really impressed with the fact that your team has managed to accomplish so much with such a small budget. I think there's a lot to be learned from what you guys have accomplished. But seriously, thank you so much for your time talking about this. And for your sake and everybody else, I hope that that comet survives this pass by the sun and is absolutely spectacular. You know what, me too. We will see. We will see. Thanks, Alan. Thank you very much. One more thing worth mentioning is that Alon and his wife Alejandra run star tours from their observatory in San Pedro de Ata Cama. And it's not just a side project. The tours are part of how they fund the research that you just heard about. If you've ever wanted to experience one of the darkest, clearest skies on earth, while knowing that that visit helps keep a world-class planetary defense survey running, this might be a trip for you. I'll add links to Alon's website to this episode page. And if you're interested in going, please make sure to book ahead. Space is limited and the Ata Cama is not exactly a quick detour. And now to learn more about how you can observe this comet if it survives its perilous journey, here's our chief scientist, Dr. Bruce Betts, for What's Up. Hey, Bruce. Hey, Sarah. Man, we got a lot to look forward to this week. We got, you know, possibly Artemis 2 launching, maybe, maybe. But also, man, one of our Shoemaker Near Earth Object Grant-winning programs found potentially one of the coolest comments. We'll see if it survives. Yeah, I know. It's a it's a gambling thing. It's a high risk, high reward, not the way I do anything to do with it. But it'll either burn up and go away and be boring. Or it'll be delightful in the sky. That's delightful in the sky for playing the home game. I really hope so. I mean, it was really cool learning about the Croix group of comets just as a basic concept and like the history of people viewing these things over hundreds of years. So I hope we get really lucky in this ad still, legacy of really spectacular comets. But if people do want to watch it, how do they do that? Look, up in the sky, it's a comet. It's OK, let's seriously. But seriously, folks, April 2nd through the 4th, it's getting really close to the sun and the sky. So not something you want to even try to look at because of, you know, sun burning your eyes out. Don't do that. But we spacecraft will be able to take a look at it, particularly so. We'll be able to check out and we'll get a better idea, probably whether it's going to vaporize or not. But we'll really get a better idea when it hits perihelion on the 4th, so close this point to the sun, a mere 162,000 kilometers, which if you're going next to the sun is closer than you want to be to the sun. If it is, if it's going to lose some weight one way or the other with sublimating ice to gas. But if it does survive, it may be visible in daylight even on the 4th, but it'll get moved away from the sun, get probably easier to see if it, assuming it survives, which is not a good assumption, but it's an exciting assumption. It'll be close as approach to the earth on April 5th. And then the second week of April, it'll be probably prime viewing time for earthbound people. It'll be you want to look low in the evening west. So think of it as the near it's near the sun. And if if you've seen pictures of croits, comets that have survived and done well, you get potentially a beautiful long tail in this as the sun has set and the sunset glow and it's it's fabu. So hopefully that will happen. The southern hemisphere is actually in a better place. It's a better place, at least for this this event. And it'll be higher in the sky and northern hemisphere. It'll be better to wait to that second week where the southern hemisphere can dive in a little sooner. And everyone look western horizon after sunset. And again, don't don't stare at the sun. That hurts. Yeah, there's a bunch of things we're just kind of sitting here waiting to see whether or not it happens, whether or not this comet breaks apart, whether or not Artemis 2 launches. I have no idea what the rest of this week is going to bring. So I'm I'm just, you know, I'm I'm sitting in on the edge of my space seat. You have a space seat. Oh, my gosh, you do that. So cool. All right. So we move on to random space. We want. So this rocket, this SLS thing, big, big rocket, it carries for its main engines, liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. If you took those two combined liquids and do something that you wouldn't do, you could overflow an Olympic sized swimming pool with the combination. So think of a 50 meter by 25 yard, at least in the US, that's the typical weird dimension pool. And you make it deep in. You have all that liquid that you're trying to launch and using that liquid to launch. Oh, by the way, and you have to keep it really cold. But yeah, more than Olympic swimming pool, if you combine that, that's with a big old central tank, what it mostly contains. And that's a lot. No wonder this rocket is so heavy and hard to get off the ground. I mean, honestly, what they're trying to accomplish technically is just startling. I wish everybody involved with the Artemis launch, all the luck in the world. And good luck to all the people who are going to be trying to view this comment as well. It's going to be an exciting week, you guys. Best wishes to all of you. All right, everybody, go out there and look up in the night sky and think about being in a spacecraft that's on its way to the moon and you look over and hey, there's a comment. Thank you and good night. We've reached the end of this week's episode of Planetary Radio, but we'll be back next week with more space science and exploration. If you love the show, you can get Planetary Radio T-shirts at planetary.org along with lots of other cool spacey merchandise. Help others discover the passion, beauty and joy of space science and exploration by leaving a review and a rating on platforms like Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Your feedback not only brightens our day, but helps other curious minds find their place in space through Planetary Radio. You can also send us your space thoughts, questions and poetry at our email planetaryradioatplanetary.org. Or if you're a Planetary Society member, leave a comment in the Planetary Radio space in our online member community. Planetary Radio is produced by the Planetary Society in Pasadena, California and is made possible by our members all over the world. You can join us as we celebrate humanity's next steps into space and help support the people that are defending Earth at planetary.org slash join. Mark Alverda and Ray Palletta are our associate producers. Casey Dreyer is the host of our monthly space policy edition and Matt Kaplan hosts our monthly book club edition. Andrew Lucas is our audio editor. Josh Joyle composed our theme, which is arranged and performed by Peter Schlosser. My name is Sarah Al Ahmed, the host and producer of Planetary Radio. And until next week, who knows what's going to happen? Hopefully it's awesome. Ad Astra.