Odd Lots

The Iran War’s Lasting Scars Across Asia

20 min
Jun 16, 2026about 1 month ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

The Iran-US conflict and closure of the Strait of Hormuz have created a global supply shock with asymmetric impacts across economies. While wealthy nations like the US and Japan drain strategic reserves and offer subsidies, poorer Asian countries face demand destruction, food insecurity, and inflationary pressures that threaten economic growth and political stability.

Insights
  • Developed economies can absorb energy price shocks through stockpile depletion and subsidies, while emerging markets must choose between inflation and recession via demand destruction
  • The Strait of Hormuz closure is triggering a structural shift toward supply chain redundancy and energy independence, with governments building stockpiles and capacity—a deflationary reversal of 20th-century globalization
  • Food security is emerging as the delayed crisis: Southeast Asian farmers are skipping planting seasons due to diesel costs, risking a food shortage in 6-12 months that could trigger political instability
  • The AI investment boom in the US and West is competing with geopolitical shocks for capital and driving dollar strength, which exacerbates emerging market currency exposure and fiscal vulnerability
  • Sanctions effectiveness is being undermined as alternative trade routes and supply chains emerge, weakening this traditional US policy tool
Trends
Deglobalization and trade fragmentation accelerating as countries prioritize supply chain resilience over efficiencyBifurcated economic responses: wealthy nations subsidizing consumption while emerging markets implement demand destructionRising geopolitical risk premiums driving commodity hoarding and strategic stockpile building across sectorsFood price inflation and agricultural disruption emerging as delayed but severe consequences of energy shocksCentral banks selling reserve assets to defend currencies and fund oil imports, weakening fiscal positionsHelium and critical semiconductor supply constraints becoming bottlenecks for AI infrastructure buildoutPolitical instability risk rising in emerging markets due to energy costs, food insecurity, and currency weaknessClean energy and EV adoption accelerating as alternative response to oil price shocks in some marketsUS Strategic Petroleum Reserve approaching operational minimums, limiting future price stabilization capacitySanctions regimes losing effectiveness as alternative supply routes and economic workarounds emerge
Companies
JPMorgan
Cited estimate showing China's oil demand fell 9% (1.5M barrels/day) due to demand destruction policies
Bloomberg
Host network for Odd Lots podcast and Big Tech Asia; employs hosts Tracy Allaway and Joe Weisenthal
People
Tracy Allaway
Co-hosts Odd Lots podcast; analyzes geopolitical impacts on global economy and energy markets
Joe Weisenthal
Co-hosts Odd Lots podcast; discusses food security risks and inflationary pressures from supply shocks
Wan Ha
Host of Big Tech Asia podcast; moderates discussion on Iran conflict impacts across Asia
Francine Lacroix
Award-winning journalist; hosts Leaders with Francine Lacroix podcast (mentioned in intro segment)
Lorcan Kelly
Guest expert on Odd Lots; discusses farmer decisions on planting and breeding in response to fuel costs
Adam Tews
Referenced for historical anecdote about Roman emperors timing wars to avoid disrupting planting seasons
Barry Ritholtz
Host of Masters in Business podcast (mentioned in promotional segment)
Quotes
"Everyone has discovered from the past six years that these big one-off, supposedly one-off disruptions can happen with frequency."
Tracy AllawayEarly discussion
"A poor decision is always better than no decision."
Francine LacroixIntro segment
"The problem is going to arise in six months and 12 months time when the decisions we made today about do I plant that field of wheat, or do I breed more cattle for next year?"
Lorcan KellyFood security discussion
"If you're struggling to buy food, you're not going to be buying electronics, right, from China, whatever it else."
Joe WeisenthalFood crisis analysis
"The wheels are all spinning in the opposite direction of where they were in the second half of the 20th century. Trade barriers are going up and countries don't trust each other."
Tracy AllawayDeglobalization discussion
Full Transcript
I'm Francine Lacroix, an award-winning journalist, and I've got a new podcast, Leaders with Francine Lacroix from Bloomberg Podcasts. I've interviewed everyone from heads of state to fashion icons about the news of the moment, but I've always been curious who are these people as leaders? I don't think there's one right way to be a leader. Make decisions. A poor decision is always better than no decision. Listen to new episodes every other Monday. Follow Leaders with Francine Lacroix wherever you get your podcasts. Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts. Radio. News. We begin the week with the US and Iran having reached an interim deal to end hostilities and reopen the straits of hall moves. You send oil prices lower and spark a relief rally across Asian markets. Officials from both countries set to meet now in Switzerland on June 19th, where the agreement will be formally... Everyone has discovered from the past six years that these big one-off, supposedly one-off disruptions can happen with frequency. That's Bloomberg's Tracy Allaway. Tracy co-hosts the OddLots podcast, and she spends a lot of time looking at the long-term impacts of geopolitics on the global economy. So the lesson that everyone's been internalizing is that you need to build up stockpiles. You need to have independence in terms of your crucial supplies. You need to have additional capacity. And few places have shown the need for independence and extra capacity more clearly than in Asia over the past few months. After the US and Israel went to war with Iran, the strait of her moves grounded to a halt, choking off supplies of virtually every major commodity. Including one-fifth of the world's oil. I think a lot of great things are going to happen in the Middle East right now, and very importantly, the oil is plummeting down. At the G7 summit in France, President Trump touted a deal the US reached with Iran's regime over the weekend, which he says will reopen the strait of her moves. Essentially, ships are starting to go out now. On Friday, it'll be completely open. Across Asia, countries are welcoming the US-Iran peace deal that would help to stabilize global energy prices and reopen a vital shipping route. But many are skeptical that will happen. And even if it does for Asia, that shift might be too little, too late. There is this brewing but not yet impacting food issue that will arise in Southeast Asia specifically. That's Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal. He co-hosts Odd Lots with Tracy. The closure of the strait of her moves is going to create a food stress in much of the world during the next planting season. And if there's food stress, people will be buying food and not random manufactured goods in China come that time. And so there may be an element where China is choosing to reduce its imports so that its customers of manufacturers have more capacity come next year. Welcome to the Big Tech Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wan Ha. Today, I'm sitting down with my colleagues, Tracy Allaway and Joe Weisenthal, co-hosts of Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast. We recorded this conversation just before news broke that Iran and the US may have struck a deal to reopen the strait of her moves. And as you'll hear, this discussion is arguably just as relevant now as when we taped it. While the reopening of the strait would be a welcome relief, the structural shifts caused by the conflict have fundamentally changed businesses across Asia. And the resulting pressure on food and energy supplies and prices isn't going away anytime soon. On today's show, we dive into why Asia is feeling more economic pain from this conflict than Western nations and what the new normal looks like for the region and the rest of the world. While the details of the proposed new deal between the US and Iran remain unclear, one thing is certain. War in Iran and the virtual closure of the strait of her moves have effectively slapped a war tax on vital products, and it's impacted every corner of the global economy. You've probably felt the pinch in one way or another, but its effects haven't been distributed evenly. Wealthy countries like the US and Japan have opted to drain their stockpiles of crude oil. In other corners of the world, governments are turning to demand destruction by encouraging industries and consumers to use less. But that risks slowing economic growth and triggering recession. It's a glaring disparity, and Bloomberg's Tracy Allaway says it highlights a structural vulnerability. They're often poorer countries. They don't have as big stockpiles of oil inventory. And the one thing we've seen developed countries do across the world is really start to dig into those stockpiles and release barrels in order to, I guess, cushion the higher prices. And so for a poorer country, I think that's one of the reasons in Asia you're seeing the governments really focused on demand destruction rather than propping up prices. So you've had, I think, India was encouraging people not to go on flights. People are being urged not to drive to work, things like that. China is doing pretty much all the heavy lifting in terms of demand destruction or the bulk of it. So I saw a JPMorgan estimate, I think, saying that demand for oil from China had fallen like 9%. I think that's 1.5 million barrels a day. It's huge. Yeah. It's a pretty big deal. And again, it stands in stark contrast to a lot of the developed nations like the U.S. that are really digging into their stockpiles. You know, I don't know if you guys have noticed in your time here the prices at gas stations. Do you know how much gas in Hong Kong costs? No. About $33 per liter, which is equivalent of about $16 per gallon. Wow. Right? That's up about 15% since the Iran War began and diesel prices have actually jumped like near 50%. And I wonder how does this stack up to what we've seen in the U.S.? And I guess more importantly, how does that feed into inflationary pressures? I mean, if we had $16 gasoline in the U.S., there would definitely be a revolution for sure. Clearly inflation is trending up in the U.S. for a number of reasons. One of them is oil. And so you might say, well, you strip that out because that goes into headline, rather than core inflation. But then when you think about like everything has oil or energy in it, especially because of transport costs, it just builds that upward pressure, throw in all the data center spending. And the story is just like building heat and pressure on everything and oil is just part of it. In some countries with limited resources, governments are left with little choice but to turn the lights off. But wealthier countries are playing a very different game. Instead of asking citizens to cut back, the countries who can afford it are spending heavily to absorb the sticker shock at the pump. You know, here in Hong Kong, the government is actually putting aside the equivalent of $230 million U.S. dollars in a subsidy program to help manage soaring fuel prices. It does seem like there's this imbalance in how the burden of the conflict is being carried, right? You've got developed economies like Hong Kong and Germany able to afford these subsidies while you've got emerging countries who literally can't keep the lights on. What do you guys make of that disparity? And I guess the question is, is this something U.S. policymakers even think about? Probably not, to be honest. One of the interesting things here is, to me, is how long the U.S. can actually offset the pain of higher prices. They've obviously been releasing a lot from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The question is, how long can you actually keep doing it? And apparently, the U.S. is now getting pretty close to its operational minimum. So I think the minimum is like 250 million barrels. And we're now at... 349 million, yeah. And it's the lowest. We're back to the post-COVID lows. Yeah, that's right. So the issue in the U.S. is like, crunch time could come, right? Exactly. They're going to lose that buffer pretty soon. Yeah. And I think Asia does seem caught in this trap that really is not of its own making, right? You've got interest rates that are rising globally, of course, driven by the war shocks and the AI investment boom centered in the U.S. and the West. You've got the U.S. dollar really strong right now. What do you think is impact of the U.S. dollar strengthening on emerging Asian economies? Not good. So there's the outlook for economic growth and there's the outlook for the fiscal side, let's say. And so if you're spending money to subsidize oil prices and you're running through your stockpiles in some instances, then it becomes more expensive the longer it goes on. One of the theories I've seen for the falling gold price recently is that governments are selling... or central banks are selling reserve assets in order to raise more foreign effects so that they can buy more oil at the higher prices. It exacerbates foreign currency exposure for emerging markets and probably weakens their fiscal position in the future. And then in terms of economic growth, so obviously if you can't get oil, if you can't get feedstock for plastics, that's pretty much in everything and so you'll see less economic activity. But on the other hand, if we see some countries respond to higher oil prices by actually building out more clean energy capacity, selling more EVs for instance, then that could be a little bit of an economic boost. And I'm not saying that it's enough to fully offset the impact, but it's something at least. So let's get back to the context of the question. It doesn't matter what the price of the dollar is, people are going to spend a crazy amount of money on memory chips from Korea, period. The lawn could go up, the lawn could go down, it doesn't matter. We're going to be shipping a lot of dollars to Korea and Taiwan for key infrastructure for the AI build out. And so I think, yes, absolutely, like the strength of the dollar is real, but I think we're in this very odd moment where because the AI race feels existential, that the traditional macro signals that we would look at like rates and FX are being swamped by the spending that everyone has just chosen to make for existential reasons on so many aspects of AI. Yeah, and to your point, Asia is the backbone of the global AI ecosystem. Factories here produce the chips that power the AI revolution. But those factories rely heavily on energy and raw materials, right? So what happens if there's ongoing uncertainty or disruption at the Strait of Hormuz? Should we do helium? Yeah, I was going to, yeah, go for it. No, you start. Well, I was just going to say like, both of our minds went to helium at the same time. So it's like, this is pretty important in advanced semiconductor manufacturing helium. Please don't ask me exactly why, but it has to do something with like its ability to go down to incredibly cold temperatures, which is helpful in all kinds of different ways. But there is not a lot of elasticity in helium supply. And so if there's going to be like one link where the persistent closure of the Strait of Hormuz might actually intersect with that, it would be if they truly run out of helium. And then you just really have a much harder time making chips. Now, I want to shift to interest rates for a bit. Japan's wholesale inflation accelerated in May at its fastest pace in three years, and its producer price index also surged to 6.3 percent was quite high. That puts a lot of pressure on the Bank of Japan to hike interest rates. And across Asia, you are seeing countries raising their inflation projections and pushing interest rates higher. What do you think would be the broader impact of prolonged inflation across Asia? And what does it mean for U.S. consumers? So the inflationary impact is there, right? And it's not even necessarily oil. It's also those petrochemicals which go into everything. And then the other thing in terms of inflation, governments and companies around the world are learning that it's important to build up stockpiles. And it's important to build out your energy capacity or your petrochemical capacity or your chips capacity, things like that. If you have everyone all at once trying to do this, that consumes resources, right? That is de facto inflationary. And I think that's probably the lesson we have collectively learned from the past few years, is that you don't want to be left high and dry if there's a big disruption. It is really important to have extra stuff. And extra stuff, you know, means higher prices. After the break, why we may not yet have seen the full extent of damage caused by the closure of the Strait of Hermos, and how the fallout from the war is reshaping Asia's relationship with the rest of the world. Hi, I'm Barry Rithaltz inviting you to join me for the Masters in Business podcast. Every week we bring you conversations with the people who shape markets, investing and business. I speak with CEOs, Nobel laureates, market innovators and legendary investors. Whether you own stocks, bonds, real estate commodities, even crypto, these are discussions you absolutely need to hear. Subscribe to the Masters in Business podcast on Apple Spotify or anywhere you listen. The supply shock caused by the closure of the Strait of Hermos is arguably the biggest ever. But by draining reserves, finding workarounds and managing demand, governments have tried to shield their citizens from the pain, or delaying it at least. Even if the Strait does open this weekend, Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Allaway say that pain might still be coming. Richer countries will be able to spend to ease it, but poorer countries in Asia don't have those resources. And that could spell trouble for everyone. You guys spoke with a former farmer, Lorcan Kelly, on one of your recent episodes. The problem is going to arise in six months and 12 months time when the decisions we made today about do I plant that field of wheat, or do I breed more cattle for next year? And farmers are going to say, no, we're not going to do that. Across Southeast Asia, right now, farmers are now skipping this planting season. Because they can't afford the diesel for the tractors. They can't afford the diesel for the water pumps that they need to cultivate the crops. And some are actually choosing to leave crops rotting in the ground because they can't afford to harvest. I mean, that's huge, right? So this is what I was saying earlier, that perhaps one of the shoes that may be yet to drop is a food crisis in Asia. And it's perhaps the hierarchy of needs, right? If you're struggling to buy food, you're not going to be buying electronics, right, from China, whatever it else. And so perhaps one part of the logic for China to reduce its imports is to ease a little bit of that squeeze. But what I've heard, which is that there is this brewing but not yet impacting food issue that will arise in Southeast Asia specifically. When it comes to the impact of fertilizer, we're talking about longer time frames because there are planting seasons, as you just mentioned. One historical anecdote that I learned from Adam Tews is that apparently in ancient Roman times, emperors would try to time wars so that they weren't during the planting season. So they wouldn't disrupt food supplies also so that farmers could actually go off and be soldiers. But clearly we seem to have forgotten that lesson. I want to stay on food for a bit. You know, in Thailand, I was there in Bangkok just a couple of weeks ago and talked to our colleagues there. They've done some really great reporting on how fishermen in Thailand are keeping their boats anchored because fuel eats up more than half of the cost of every trip. So, you know, they basically can't raise the price of their catch, right? So they're deciding not to go out. And I wonder to what extent should policymakers and leaders worry about this, you know, turning into a political problem, right, this ag issue? Yeah, I mean, look, I don't know if I ever fully bought the theory, but, you know, there are many people who argued, for example, that the catalyst for the Arab Spring was wheat prices that year. And, you know, our leadership has other things on their mind. We're talking about this is very classic type of thing that creates real political disruption. And I don't think we should have the hubris to assume that these cycles, which should probably have data points going back thousands of years have suddenly stopped. And I guess with sanctions, I mean, I do wonder to what extent that the oil crunch would lead to the weakening of essentially one of the U.S.'s biggest non-military weapons, right, sanctions. There was an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal that the North Korean economy is doing surprisingly well. They're actually building a lot of housing and there's sort of quite a little evidence of like improving standard of living and so forth. And of course, here is like, you know, one of the most sanctioned countries on earth for a very long time. I just think like the degree to which sanctions are a powerful tool or that they can really be used to like crush any enemy, all of it's being called into question right now. Now, let's say the war ends next week. How do you think the world has fundamentally been changed because of this war and how it's played out? So I think it goes back to, I guess, the idea of the choke point economy. So everyone has discovered from the past six years that these big one-off, supposedly one-off disruptions can happen with frequency, right? So each disruption is slightly different in what it actually is, but they're happening more often. I mean, I'm sure both of us having been in Hong Kong during the pandemic, I will always keep an extra supply of toilet paper from now until forever, basically. We all learn that. And so I think that impulse is going to stick around for a long time. The world is very globalized. I feel like for me coming here to Hong Kong, it's been very helpful reminder like how integrated the world still is. But the wheels are all spinning in the opposite direction of where they were in the second half of the 20th century. Trade barriers are going up and countries don't trust each other and that is going to have consequences for both productivity and prices. This is the Big Tech Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Juan Ha. To get more from the big take and unlimited access to all of Bloomberg.com, subscribe today at Bloomberg.com slash podcast offer. If you liked the episode, make sure to subscribe and review the Big Tech Asia wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps people find the show. Thanks for listening. See you next time. We bring you deeper dives into the story shaping your world from the evolution of AI to the shifting priorities of global business. Plus Silicon Valley power players and the latest tech trends. Catch up on the conversations you missed during the day. Subscribe to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere you listen. We come in. We set up. We do it all for you so you don't have to. It's not rocket science. It's installation science. Switch to gigaclear from only 16 pounds a month. Faster broadband for rural Britain.