THEY CAN'T HIDE ANYMORE w/ Auron MacIntyre & Adam Johnson

Hey everybody, how's it going? Thanks for joining us tonight. I'm Orin McIntyre and for Tim Pool on Timcast, we've got a great show with a lot of great guests. Hope you enjoy it. Today, it looks like Bill and Hillary Clinton are finally going to have to testify when it comes to the Epstein probe. They were trying to dodge it the whole time, but they've been threatened with contempt and they're finally going to comply. We're also going to be talking about the Minnesota blockades. Once again, Antifa is doing its trick where it tries to stop everyone moving up and down the block, taking everybody's license plates, making sure that they control the streets. We'll also be talking about the leftists and the way that they are absolutely embarrassing themselves over Don Lemon, the Grammys, and deportations. Before we get to all that to get today, guys, let's hear from our sponsor. Webroots. All right, my friends, I'm sure you've heard. Last week, TransUnion confirmed a data breach that affects over 4 million people. It's a prime example of why it's important for people that have products like Webroot Total Protection, which includes identity protection for up to 10 identities, up to a million thousand fraud expense reimbursement, 24 seven US based customer support plus elder fraud hotline, identity and dark web monitoring plus you'll get antivirus VPN and cloud backup so you're protected holistically from all threats. Webroot Total Protection is an all in one, is all in one device privacy and identity protection that can keep you safe in the event that your personal data is compromised. If your identity is stolen, it can take between 100 and 200 hours to resolve it on your own, but not if you have Webroot Total Protection. With Webroot Total Protection, you have insurance for your digital life and personal data. Let Webroot Total Protection give you your peace of mind back in the wake of these continued data breaches and evolving digital threats. You'll get 50% off Webroot Total Protection or Webroot Essentials when you go to webroot.com slash pool, P-O-O-L, no E. Live a better digital life with Webroot. Again, 50% off at webroot.com slash pool. Got a great sponsor. It is Beamedream. Go to shopbeam.com slash Tim Pool and you can get up to 30% off your Beamedream. No joke. I drink this stuff every night. It is your nighttime blend to support better sleep. They got cinnamon, cocoa flavor, brownie batters. He saw caramel, chocolate, peanut butter. It is delicious. It's got alfionine, reishi, magnesium, melatonin and I drink it every night. Not kidding. And I sleep like a rock. I was going to say baby. Anybody with baby knows babies don't sleep that well. I'm going to get that for my mom. It's fantastic. You drink it, right? I've heard you drink it all night. So I have a bunch of the single use packets and we brought them with us when we came down. I got a big Ziploc bag full of them. I drink it every night. Cinnamon cocoa is my favorite. I recommend you guys try it. There's no added sugar. It's only 15 calories. Legit. When we first got the sponsor from them, I was like, I'll give it a try. Hey, this tastes pretty good. It's hot cocoa. And I was like, I don't know. The first day I was kind of like, after like day three, my sleep score skyrocketed because I have a sleep tracker and I was out. I deep sleep was up. This is especially important for guys because testosterone and HGH occur during REM and deep sleep. And if you're not getting proper sleep because you're dehydrated and you don't have enough magnesium, you're suffering. You're suffering. Believe it or not, just having better testosterone and better sleep, you're going to lose weight. That's true too. People, I see this all the time. People are like, I just, I just, I can't lose weight. Are you sleeping? Are you drinking water? They're not. I'm a huge fan of this stuff. Again, I seriously do drink it. Even Phil's drinking it now. Yep. Good stuff. All right, guys. Our guest tonight is Adam the Lectern guy. Thanks for coming on. Hey, thanks for having me on. Looking forward to hanging out. For those who don't know me, my name is Adam Johnson. I'm running for Manatee County Commissioner. You can give me money on voteadamjohnson.com to help me get elected. We do need it. Everything starts in your backyard. So that's why I'm running local. Good to see you, man. Hey, at Ian Crosslin, you'll find me. I'm Ian Crosslin. Check out Graphene.movie. If you haven't been over there yet, check out the new upcoming documentary, Graphene Movie, that I'm producing. Other than that, we got Tate Brown. What is going on, Patriots? Jeez. A little rusty. It's been like a week. Tate Brown, you're holding it down. Yeah, I was paying homage to our greatest ally. I was actually in the UK all week. Put my hand up on the, on Hadrian's wall. Gave it a little smooch. It was a beautiful thing. So I'm happy to be back. I feel recharged. Phil, how's it going? Hello, everybody. My name is Philip Bontie. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band All That Remains. I'm an anti-communist and a counter-revolutionary. Let's get into it. All right, guys, coming from NBC News, it looks like Bill and Hillary Clinton agree to testify in the House Epstein probe ahead of a contempt vote. Clinton's previously refused to appear before the Republican-led House Oversight Committee. We all know that this is something that Steve Bannon ended up running into. He was held in contempt of Congress for not going along with testifying. The Clintons have been flouting this for a long time. Many people were asking, are they going to live by the same rules? Are they going to face the same consequences? It looks like they are going to blink and testify. Guys, what do we think? I think that they're going to risk perjury over contempt. Because if you look at like James Clapper, perjury, said they didn't wittingly spy on the American people with the prison program they did. Nothing's happened to James, or what's his name? What did I say? Not, not Columbia. Clapper. I don't have a name yet. So I think they're going to go on the stand and may very well telecrafted. Like, I don't know. But I don't know. I think they're willing to commit perjury at this point, the way that the legal system has been treating. Well, they have a good track record with dodging perjury charges. There's no consequences for the Clintons when they perjure themselves. So if I was Bill Clinton, I'd be like, perjury it is. I'm not going to go ahead and try to be in contempt. You said multiple times. Wait, Adam, let me ask you this. You said the first time you got engaged in politics is when you saw Clinton perjured and then didn't get busted for it. Yep. I was, you know, I was a young guy like 23 or something like that. And I figured, you know, he perjured himself. I was like, OK, he had lied under oath. If anyone else does that, you know, they go to jail. So he's probably going to be removed from office being young and naive as I was. And then when he wasn't, I was like, what the hell's going on around here? I was like, whoa, whoa, whoa. You know, I couldn't believe it because, again, I was young and naive. And I thought that if he broke the, you know, it was it was arguably worse than what Nixon did. And now granted, Nixon wasn't removed from office. He stepped down. But still, I was like, OK, well, this seems cut and dry, you know. Well, Clinton got away with it, I think, largely because the religious right or the Republicans at the time made the mistake of making it about the blow job and not about the procedure. They needed a moral majority argument. And that actually, I think, fell down as opposed to a legal procedure argument of, hey, committed perjury needs to go to jail. That was the frustrating thing for me is like people were constantly saying, oh, you know, of course he got a blow job. You know, powerful guys and Kennedy and blah, blah, blah. And I was like, I was like, why are people even talking about that? That's not what this is about. Like nobody goes to jail because they got a blow job. You go to jail because you broke the law and it blew my mind that it was being cast that way. You know, again, young and naive. I'm like, what are you talking about? This isn't about a blow job. He lied. I go to jail if I lied. I go under oath. Well, two things. First, I speak for Hillar when I say at this point, what differences make now? And secondly, I mean, he perched himself because who's going to admit to having, you know, relations with a fat chick? Right. What was his lie? What was his actual lie on the stand? He lied about whether or not he had relations with a fat chick. I did not have sex with that woman. I could not have sexual relations with that woman. Miss Lewinsky. What is it? At the American Pete pointed at the camera. But what's the house supposed to like ask him that they would like? They have very limited information. They'll be like, did you go to or were you on the Epstein list? We're like, yeah. Well, OK, that's what exactly are we just like hoping to get out of this? Well, the process is the key, right? Because obviously we know the photos are out there. We know his name is mentioned. The question is how bad can you make him look? How much can you drag him through that? How many places can you lead him where he might further indict himself or create some kind of problem? I don't think there's probably going to be a lot of there there. I think most of the revelations are already in the Epstein files, but putting him through that making him go through that process is itself a punishment. We learn this from the Trump administration, right? It's not always what you're going to get once you people put people under oath and you put them up in front of Congress, they might come out and say things that are going to just bury them politically. And that's ultimately what a lot of people are looking for. Maybe not the most, I guess, upstanding way to conduct yourself, but it is ultimately the way American politics works. This is going to be bread and circuses at the end of it. I mean, nothing will come of this. I'm it's not going to come of it, but it is the bread and circuses we're asking for. We've been asking for high profile people to be brought into court and have to testify for the things they may or may not have done. So I think at the end of it, I think people will look at this and say, we are doing something. And I think that's good going into the midterms. It's a great way to call it a bread and circus, because as I'm scrolling like with, you know, the economy, what's happened with silver went up four times and then got 30 percent dropped all these people. They took people for a run crypto drop by 10, 15 percent. Like this is the bread and circus is the Clinton is the is the Epsiom stuff. That's what they want people to focus on and fight about. When in the background, they're they're like changing our economy into a crypto, you know, control state. It feels like behind us. It's another conversation completely. But I do sense that. There's some truth where like the entire Epstein thing, it hit a point, kind of like pizza gate where like when it first happened, you're kind of following and you're like, yeah, yeah, that actually does make there might be something here. And then there was, I remember it just hit a certain point where it was like just all the insane people flooded in and then it became like a completely untouchable. This is kind of what's happening with the Epstein stuff now, as it's gotten to the point where it's gotten so mainstream, it's turned into something that it never was, where now it's starting to become a toxic thing. And it's going to make it more difficult to actually get any justice out of this because it's just been flooded with the retard right for like a better word. And in addition, it's just people are expecting different things as a result of like this entire investigation. Well, and there's tons of confirmation bias, right? Whether or not there's anything that's actually actionable in there, people see a name, they're like, see this name's in the Epstein file. So of course, that means that they were doing this thing and it's just turned into just a slop that's the people pointing fingers. Of course, there are things that people should be prosecuted for. I'm not making the argument that there aren't. But whether or not people have broken the law is irrelevant to most of the people that want to use this as a club, as a club on X to be like, this person was in the Epstein file. So of course, blah, blah, blah. There are people again, like I said, there are people that have broken the law. Broken the law. They should be investigated. They should be arrested. If they, if they, they're alleged to have broken the law, they should see the full extent of justice. But there's a online phenomena of saying, look, they're in the Epstein file. And I found this and blah, blah, blah. And it's just a slew of just an orgy of confirmation bias where people are pointing fingers and saying, you're guys bad, you're guys bad, you're guys bad, or you know this guy or whatever, you know, any kind of tenuous connection they're going to use to say, this person did this and it's just turned into something where you can't really find any clarity. I'm glad you changed your description from a slew to an orgy. You're just saying, Warren. Well, I was just going to say, this is the nature of news cycles. You know, when you had the Epstein files as a story out there that was unclear, it could, you could build the conspiracy and there was a real conspiracy. Like obviously these files were bad. Our elites did not want us to have access to them. They were embarrassed about what went on there and they didn't want those out. But it was really what you could project onto this, what I think is built a lot of hype and interest into it. Once it's out there in the open, once we actually have the files, that's actually less exciting because you can no longer just speculate about what's being hidden and what forces are working against you and who's hiding documents. Now you have to actually sift through everything. You need to verify, you need to fact check. A lot of this is going to fall away because it's unprovable or it was just salacious, but ultimately didn't go anywhere. We are, I think, ultimately going to get facts that are important. I think this really still matters, but I think the hype cycle with this is done. Now it's more of the drudgery of investigation. Maybe something more will come out. But I think Adam's ultimately right that what really matters is we're putting bad people in front of Congress, in front of questioning. That's what people wanted. That's what people especially want to see from the Trump administration. He's supposed to be this guy from outside the swamp. He's crushing the elites. He's breaking through the institutional barriers that exist in Washington. They wanted to see him make the elites pay. And the fact that he did not do that initially with the Epstein files, I think was a lot of what people felt betrayal about. So getting this done, getting elites in front of cameras, in front of questions. I think that's what matters to people more than the actual content. And I'm not saying the content doesn't matter, but I think that's ultimately what's going to be cathartic for people through this process. Well, we need this in the 16. One of the great takeaways from the debates was Trump telling Hillary Clinton, because you'd be in prison. You remember this, right? And we all got riled up and said, man, that was the moment when I knew I was voting for Trump. And then we had the 16th through 20 administration. Hillary didn't go to prison. And I think a lot of people were hesitant to vote for him again, because they saw the first administration not actually carry the water and carry the weight of the things that they said they were going to do. I think this administration has the ability and the time to get it done. We're we're less than a year away from midterms. And I've always held the belief that the reason we haven't seen sweeping arrest yet is because one, when you go to start arresting people, it's all hell. It's going to break loose. And to organize that without leaks, because people will flee the country. They have dual citizenship. They will go. You need to be very precise. You can't have leaks. And for optics sake, if you arrest someone at a high profile level, you have to find juries that will indict judges that will take the case, not throw them out. A lot of these things that we saw two people indicted, right? It was a Comey and Comey and someone else that charges. Got the Tisha James. Yeah. Yeah. So that's gone, right? I think for midterms, you have to have good optics. You have to have energized people. I think you wait to prosecute these people closer to midterms, because you need to energize your party movement. I think it's also very clear at this point that the Clintons aren't going to jail. Like they're just not going to put an old man in jail at this point, no matter how much he deserves it. So really, it is about the truth and reconciliation. It is getting them up there, getting to the bottom of this. Is there anyone else connected? Is this is there a wider conspiracy we need to understand, a wider network? I think that's the kind of stuff that you're going to be driving at with the Clintons. I don't think they're actually going to be looking to pursue a particular criminal case against them or try to drive deeper into, you know, getting these guys in jail. They're that those, those optics aren't great for you at this point. There was a time when putting Hillary Clinton in the jail was dynamic. Like you're saying, the locker up chance mattered. I think at this point, people have kind of moved on and you can't that, you know, this is the good upside and the downside of Biden stepping in there. Biden is just simply not as nefarious a creature as Hillary Clinton, right? Like he's just too, like I'm sure he's a bad person. But he's just too checked out. He's, you know, completely unable to function mentally. You can only really feel like you can hold him accountable for his actions for so long because of how senile he is. And so people aren't there chanting, put Joe in jail. It's like, you know, put Joe in the nursing home, right? Like at this point. And so he's not the person that their ire is really directed at. You don't have that easy target to put away. I mean, someone like Anthony Fauci would be far more relevant at this point. So I just don't think the Clintons create that target that satiates the desire for people to have an affairs character put behind bars, but they could lead us towards someone that is worthy of that. I do think, yeah, I think this is going to turn into, you're saying, Brent circus, maybe I think just a circus. Cause I mean, one of the other consider is, I mean, the House Judiciary Committee on the Republican side, it's Jim Jordan's on there, Thomas Massie's on there. Like you're going to get some like insane soundbites coming out of this. It's going to get chippy. All these, especially these new congressmen, they're going to be looking for other moment, so to speak. And so they're going to be unleashing just some craziness on Bill. And that's going to be actually a problem. I think Bill is going to be ready for that sort of thing. He's going to be able to counter it. I'm not, I'm not terribly optimistic about, about this whatsoever. I don't think we're going to get the slam dunk that we think we're going to get. No, but I mean, even if they put the Clintons, even if they put the Clintons in jail, that's not going to move the needle like for actual policy in the United States is not going to change, you know, the nature of government because they're out of the, you know, they're out of government. They're just, you know, old people that have been put out the pasture. So it'd be fine. I'd be, I'd be perfectly fine with them going to jail because they, I'm sure that, you know, Clinton and they both have broke plenty of laws, but it wouldn't, it wouldn't change the forecast for, you know, the midterms. It wouldn't change the forecast for the next presidential election. And so at the end of the day, it doesn't change the circumstances for the right in the, in the United States. And the important thing is the right winning because that's how we save the country from what the left is doing. I'd be much happier to see Tim Walls and Ilhan Omar in prison. Yeah, that's right. Because that's actually where, that's actually where we're at. They're, they're robbing the coffers from my grandchildren. Like as we speak, and, you know, a lot of people are calling for insurrection act, these things like this. I think stay focused, keep doing audits. Go to California next, go to Ohio. You start tearing open the books and you show where these people are actually robbing our country and bringing in these migrants who are ruining our culture. I think you focus on that. You stay the course, you stay the mission. Yeah. And that's where like an actual probe would be quite interesting. Dragging people in and asking, what did you think, Tim? Well, how did Somali's actually benefit me? Do you have any data to present us? Do you have anything to back this up whatsoever? Just those simple questions would completely, I think, pay long term dividends for the right. Yeah, I think putting it all on display. I think you're both correct. Because ultimately we're in the scenario where we only have so much political capital. You have to choose your targets carefully. And ultimately, again, I think people do care about the Epstein files. But as you say, moving into midterms, looking at the situation in the country would much rather see Democrat criminals currently being held accountable, rather than trying to reach back, you know, eight, 12, 15 years to try to figure out and relitigate how these people conducted themselves. Even though the justice is critical, it really is about optics. It really is about expending political capital. And when you're in that scenario, you have to have a laser focus. And again, as you guys were saying, someone like Tim Wall is going to jail would just be far more important, far more critical and would actually show that the Trump administration isn't just looking back, hoping to, you know, pull some skeletons out of clauses, but is actively looking at Democrats today as political enemies who are hurting the country and is willing to step in and stop them and hold them accountable. Yeah, you settle scores after you win, but it's like you got to be in a position where you can actually settle scores. Yeah. We're not there yet. I know it's been a few years, but they rounded up 1,600 of us and put most of us in prison for walking through a building peacefully. These, they are our enemy. They mean to kill us and imprison us and we need to stay focused. They're willing to shoot a president. They're willing to shoot, you know, Charlie Kirk. They, they don't, they're not playing nice. And we really need to stay focused and not get so distracted by things. And I mean, the Epstein files, they matter. They absolutely do. And I'll get hate for this, but our focus should be we don't have a lot of time left. We have maybe a year before they win. Midterms and the kneecap, the rest, the administration and make a, make a slamed up, we can't pass things in Congress. Can't pass things in Senate. We need to stay focused. And to your point, like the, I've said this before, like they're not going to just go after people that are big names. They're not going to just go after Donald Trump. They're not going to just go after, um, you know, people that are, are, you know, influential on the right, because those people are the people that normal people expect to get wrapped up when the guy down the street that did a little bit of canvassing for the Republicans goes to jail. Then everybody that knows him is like, Oh, I could be on the chopping block. And that cools people's desire to be politically active in the future. So they'll go after the big fish. Sure, they'll go after Donald Trump. That's definitely going to happen, but they'll also go after the small fish because if they get enough small fish and they're easier to get to, if you get some dude that's just in the GOP or whatever, that's like, you know, uh, at a state level or even a town level, if those people go to jail, that it doesn't cost them a lot of money. They don't have a lot of money to defend themselves the way that, you know, bigger names do. If you go after people that are, you know, average Joe's, they're easier to put in jail and it does a whole lot more to cool off people's interest in being politically active. You have more of your average people that are just like, I want to keep my head down. I don't want to get in trouble. I don't want them to, I don't want the eye of Sauron to be put on me. You know, so it's really important that, that we win in November and it's really important that we win in 2028 because it's not just the big names. It's not just the people that you see on podcasts. It's going to be people that you know, just like Adam said, you know, 1600 people that were just at the, at the, uh, at the Capitol and they didn't do anything particularly bad. They were walking through. They put a lot of people in jail and the reason they did that was to intimidate the right. You're going to go even harder. Should the left win again? They freaking intimidated everybody like people on the left too. Like I better bow down to my servant master even harder because I see they're serious now is crazy. No, the left cheered them on. The left cheered them on when they did this. They actually formed groups. The FBI paid, I think it was a decision under $100,000 to source out and find anyone who was there that day. Like they cheered it on. So I don't think the left necessarily, you know, were afraid. I think they were like, oh, we're in power. We're now taking power and we really need to have that type of mentality. We're in power now. We need to wield that power and make sure we crush the communists for the foreseeable future and never let them rise again. That's our energy. That's where we need to be. Knowing what you know now, having been arrested for being at the Capitol, served three months in prison, basically, literally. And I assume that had some sort of radicalization effect on your brain. Like I've never, like you've changed. You're running for office now. Like you've changed. You're like outspoken now on the, on the internet, on TV. But like knowing what you know about innocent people getting targeted or people that did very little and getting big sentences, how would you go forward against like you said, the communist, attempted communist revolution? Like how would you deal with that in an attempt to not radicalize those people? The way that some of these people of J6 were. Well, I don't think some of these people, people are salvageable or savable. I think that these, look, we're at war, whether you want to admit it, whether you want to accept it, we are at war with these people. These people have no desire to live in the country as, as it exists. They don't want to be here. They don't want to live next to us. They don't be our neighbors. There was a survey that was done, I think it was by, how was either, I think it was Rasmussen where they asked people during COVID, you know, what, what should we do with people who are refusing to take the vaccine? I think it was 29% of them said that my children should be moved from my custody for not vaccinating them. We're talking about almost 30% of our neighbors who said, I want to take their children from them. That's who they are. They're not hiding from it. They're not shying away from it. So we need to wake up and realize who these people are. They will stop at nothing to crush and kill us. Adam, I feel like I've said this a thousand times, but I just get, you know, more and more manic every time I say it, because it seems like people are not listening. How am I still having to explain to people at this point that that's where we are? You know, every time it's, oh, Trump might take some kind of action. We might use some kind of power. It's, well, what if the Democrats get back in charge? Like, how are we still making that argument? They've already done it. It's absolutely nuts. It's like, you guys understand that you can just never let the left come back into power again. That is the only answer. The minute they are back in power, they will arrest everybody and they don't have your morals and I have your scruples. They don't have your principles. None of this will stop them because they also don't have activist judges sitting there waiting to sabotage them. They will have the full power of the government. They will run through you entirely. It's ridiculous to me that we still have to make this argument. I don't understand how people don't grasp. On Friday, we talked to, we had Cam Higbeon and Lisa was here and we were talking about Don Lemon being arrested and they both were kind of squishy on it because they're like, well, you know, I don't want them to arrest, you know, me or you know, Cam was saying that. It's like, guys, like, you're not going to be able to say, oh, we don't want to set the precedent because the precedent has already been set. Like the left will do this. They've already done this. When they get back into power, they're going to do it again. So I understand that, you know, you care about the First Amendment and you have, you know, you care about the freedom of press and you have principles and stuff. They don't. So to behave as if they do or to say that any exercise of power that the right does is going to give, give a permission to the left. That's just wrong. They're going to do it regardless. Yeah, like it's going to be like 2030 and we're all facing the wall and I look at it or and I was like, man, we should have left on Lemon alone. It truly is just incredible. Like the things that divide us are now greater than the things that unite us. And I know that's not comfortable. I know that's like a really difficult thing to acknowledge, but it's deadly to ignore it. Like, you don't get any bonus brownie points for denying reality right before the guillotine drops. It's coming for you either way. And again, I just think it's insane. And we can see that in our next story here from Alpha News. It looks like anti-ice agitators set up blockades on the Minneapolis streets. They're checking people's driver's licenses and their plates to put them through a database. They want to see if you're somebody who's related to ICE, if they're someone that they can ultimately attack. You've got, you see the checkpoints here. The little autonomous zones. I appreciate the recliner being used. They should do the same thing at polling locations. They were just trying to block ICE to get anywhere near polling locations. I wonder what that means, right? Like, I wonder what that implies. They should send an M-wrap through that thing. Just knock it down. The idea that this is acceptable and is ridiculous. You mean the Feds or the local state police force? I think the Feds should. Like, if these people are setting up checkpoints and making, you know, people stop, that's completely and totally outside of the realm of acceptable. Like, the Feds should go in there and take this down and throw the, they're doing, essentially, this is piracy, right? They're saying you can't come in here. They're charging tolls or what have you. Like, they should all be arrested and tossed into. Sorry, dude. We're going to roll some of this footage. Yeah, it looks like we got some footage here. Give it to me, sir. You're kidding us all, right? You're kidding me. You're fucking a car. You can't... You're kidding me. Is that Tim Balls? I see a limp wrist. So they're assaulting me and my photojournalist. Got it all on video. They actually tried to steal my phone, but I'm unsuccessful. And he didn't even get blasted all over the internet, buddy. You're kidding us all, right? You're kidding me. But yeah, I mean, look, these guys are, they're intimidating people. They're telling you, you can't go this way. You can't get out and film. Like, these people should all be arrested. That is notoriously like the edited video or what happened right before. He was like, can't assault me, bro. Like very intentionally edited right to the point where he got grabbed. Like, what did he do before for that guy to grab him in his car? I want to know. Tried to get out of his car. I don't know what happened. It was edited, you know. But that's the beauty of it, right? As we have had to hear about how unprofessional ice is, how it's a bunch of thugs and the Trump administration is just turning them loose and how important it is that we have accountability for law enforcement. But here we see that actually, nope, just completely unaccountable, untrained. You know, guys with no authority are getting out there and doing this, of course, is going to create an incident. We all remember the last autonomous zone, right? Multiple kids ended up dead. We had a warlord within a few hours. Like that's what happens when you actually suspend the rule of law. Why is the left so obsessed with turning every place they control into a lawless, violent warlord war zone? Like, it's absolutely insane. What happened with Chaz Chop? Anyway, like how did that come apart? A bunch of people got killed. And then did the local cops break it up? I'm not 100 percent sure. I think they dismantled it. They ran out of food because in a communist society, someone has to work. Well, they kept trying to plant it on top of the plastic bags. You remember them like dumping piles of like, like, from Home Depot and then like, yeah, yeah, I'll just grow some crops here. Yeah, literally. Yeah, they literally sat cardboard out and poured soil and like seeds from Home Depot. Yeah. And then three days went by and they're like, guys, this is we didn't think this out. Some dude on LSD was like dancing on it the day after it was. It was. Yeah, there was like a like a local sound call rapper that became like a warlord. He was just like executing people. So what's going on? You think at the very least that we did an inserted like a gardening manual in the Communist Manifesto, like chapter two, like just sandwich in there. How to make food. For communists, you know, I kind of like I kind of like the idea of maybe every town does have like a small chop just in the middle. So if you really are like a communist or something, you can kind of just hang out there and then the warlord will sort things out after a while. It's kind of a beautiful thing when you really think about. I read the Communist Manifesto, the first four chapters are about lowering the age of consent. So like libertarians, but with the ability without the ability to grow food. Yes. Fantastic. Well, it also looks like the Minnesota activists have put up a flag here. They're trying to recreate the famous US Marines at Iwo Jima scene. And of course, we all know the Minnesota flag has a striking resemblance to the Somali flag because the Somalis conquered Minnesota and made them change their flag. So what we're seeing here is basically a declaration that they have conquered Minnesota that the leftists now not only own the streets, but they own the entire state. You know, a lot of people will say, oh, it's just a flag. It's just a piece of cloth. It's just, you know, recreation or ritual. But I hope by now we understand that flags matter, that cloth matters, that ritual actually matters more than rhetoric. And when we allow something like this to happen, when we allow people to take these actions, is making a clear declaration that we are giving up sovereignty, that we are handing control up to foreign powers. And this simply should not be allowed in the United States. It's amazing that we continue to really allow any of this. Yeah, flags do matter. No, it's not Pride Month, but. But what did you say? I think about that, like wearing shirts with words on them. I'm like, dude, I don't even like, what is this read? What am I like? What am I promoting right now? It's that's a good way to put it, that it's more powerful than rhetoric, like imagery, promoting imagery, especially with the internet and the ability to splash that visual all over the place. So I wear blanks. You got to get paid for promotion. You know, like you see this, but you see, like, was it Ronaldo came up and there was like coax on the on the on the table and he took them off because he's like, oh, I'll kill you. I'm not getting paid to advertise this. So it's like, same thing. We should be getting paid. You're going to wear a brand on your name. We're going to get paid. This was Somalia. Yeah, this is this is terrible news. This is terrible. It's mocking Marines. Yeah. And it's the most red at thing ever to like think you could emulate the Iwo Jima by what you just like sat on the streets long enough and the police didn't bother cracking down like that's conquering. Somehow they tend to do this a lot. They do a whole like, you know, we're the same guys that were storming normally, you know, fighting the Nazis. And now we're the guys that are, you know, that beat the Japanese and Iwo Jima. It's like, bro, explained by sexuality to a 90 year old. And so it happens. Yeah, battle for Iwo Jima was horrific. I don't know if you guys are much studied on the flame. They used flamethrowers on the beach, just melting people. Like it was horrible trying to climb up that sandy mountain. Flamethrowers were for the pillboxes. Yeah, they'd get up there and like the dude and then they get hit, the flamethrower get hit and they'd explode and flame. They're like, it was just to mock it like that is really desensitized. Well, in the UK just got done with this big showdown over flags. I don't know if you guys were paying attention, but they were battling over whether or not the St. George's Cross or the Union Jack should be displayed. And it was being swapped out with Pakistani flags and everything. And, you know, again, people will say, oh, this is tiny stuff. It doesn't matter. It's just some guy taking down a flag or raising it somewhere. No, again, this is a symbol of conquest, especially in the UK context, where these people are literally raping the daughters of the English. Like what does a conquering army do? It's in military young men into your area. They take control of the streets. They rape your daughters and they raise their flag in conquest. We should see this as the step down this road. We should recognize that we are in no way immune to the things that happened in the UK when you let this kind of stuff happen, when you let this be permitted. The leftists are only going to exercise more and more power. I think we've got another clip of somebody here stopping plates as they come in. Yeah, it's just our Somali and Uber driver, man. Let's scrub it a little bit. Hey, how's it going? You said his license plates are ice? Doing good, yeah. I was just saying, it looks like in our system, your plates came up as an ice plate. That doesn't seem like it's the case. I just wanted to come through and see what was up and talk to you. See how you're doing? I'm just here to know what you're doing. I'm just here, yeah. I mean, he's clearly Somali. Yeah, totally, totally. Like masks for them, but not us, right? He's clearly Somali. Let him go. Oh yeah, I'm glad to hear it. What's your name? Ali? Ali, nice to meet you. How long have you guys been out here today? He doesn't speak English. Look at that mask face, bro. I do want to ask, what's the system you guys are using out here? We just measure the size of the forehead. Because it's obvious that what's wrong, right? I mean, the guy was just a Somali Uber driver, and that ice was just a bit ice there. You know, they're renting a lot of cars. But yeah, you know, we'll take this off the list. Yeah, you'll totally take off the list. We're honestly just from California. Just independent photojournalists. Okay, we'll have like a Twitter something. Or even Tera. Alright, alright, cool. How long has this been set up? And like, you know, the images of this are going viral online. That's why we came. I don't know if you know if they're going viral. Yeah, no, I heard that. You know, people are, people saying that. And you know, a lot of the neighbors support what we're doing. So happy to be here. Has local law enforcement said anything? Not that we know of, no. But look, I got to get back to this. I'm not trying to do no interview, alright? I've got to get back to detaining people illegally. Yeah, literally. So what does that have to do with the fact that you're like a cover as an ice agent, like an actual ice agent? Just like, hey, no, you can't drive that way. I mean, they've already run them out of restaurants. They've already intimidated them in several scenarios. But if they're in a car and it's one guy. Again, you think, but I mean, you know, look at everything that's happening here. You know, we got guys running plates through security checks. They're wearing masks. They're talking to people pushing them into cars or pulling out of cars. This is literally everything that the left complains that ice is doing. They look exactly like ice agents, but just, you know, gayer and more communist. And ultimately, they, you know, they have no real moral pushback. They just want to be the people in charge. They just want to be the authoritarians they claim ice are, right? That's ultimately their goal. They don't want to get rid of ice. They don't have a problem with that level of control or the government treating people that way. They just want to treat their enemies that way. They just don't want to be the people under the thumb. They're totally fine with the process. If they could have ice, but for like white South African refugees, they'd be knocking doors down like every single hour. Like it would be insane. They would get all of them out within like 24 hours. The solution for this, like is a TOS violation. Like I can't say what to do to fix this, but it would fix it fast. All the solutions are fed posts. All solutions are fed posts. They're actually for everything we're for. They just want their side to win. That's, that's what I'm seeing here. They're checking IDs. If you don't belong here, we're going to get rid of you. I mean, they're literally doing the thing that we're trying to do. Only we're actually following the law. Well, and it blew up their whole narrative recently because it didn't just get leaked that both of the agents that were involved in the Paredi shooting were Hispanic. So now that's news. So now like just absolutely nothing about this holds. Oh, it's racist. Oh, it's xenophobic. Oh, it's no actually like our based Mexican. It's not a Mexican. All context are moved. You see a story about like two ethnic minorities, like brutally murdering a white guy and you're like, well, what is going on in Minnesota? Like this is good. So with no context, you're like, this sounds pretty bad. And then it turns out who would have thought 2026 all the roles are reversed. Things are getting wacky and wild out there. There are nobody more motivated in ICE than the Hispanic men. Yeah, dude, they're patriots. Those guys would have been after it. Well, it's like the late Roman Empire, you know, it's just filled with the Gauls and all the foreigners that you were trying to keep up for now. They're the only people that staff it up. My favorite meme has been the Spider-Man all pointing at each other. Hernandez, ICE agent Hernandez illegal Hernandez supporter Hernandez. Well, there's secretary of state. There's something the first and second generation migrants that come here legally. They actually believe the American dream. They were given something they came here to actually have and they worked hard for it and they want to keep it. So when they see everyone coming in poor and get illegally and taking benefits, taking things, they're working hard to provide assistance for the family. I mean, they have every right to be pissed off when they should be. Every native Floridian knows that the most racist anti-immigrant people in Florida are first generation and second generation Hispanic immigrants. They're like, I got in. I know what those places are like. Pull the ladder up behind me. Light everyone who tries to get in here on fire. I am here to be American. We're done. Like that really is a real phenomenon. They are aggressive, aggressively anti-immigrant. To your earlier point, though, like this is all like the laws that ICE are enforcing are all passed in a bipartisan way. They passed. They were passed, you know, two decades ago or whatever, Democrats and Republicans. Donald Trump was elected with a majority in the electoral college and a popular majority. The popularity of deporting illegals was something like 85 percent or criminals is like 90 percent or 85 percent and deporting all illegal immigrants is like 60 percent. So these people are literally doing everything they can to go against the will of the people and against the law. And then because of the media helping to characterize this as Donald Trump is being a fascist and stuff, there are people that are getting squishy. But if you look at this just on the facts, like this is an extremely popular thing, getting rid of illegal aliens. This is what Donald Trump was elected for. And we need to see more of it. Well, it's popular with the people, but of course Hollywood absolutely hates it. And as you might imagine, there was yet another very irrelevant award ceremony. I'm sure both people who watched it really enjoyed it. I think it's called the Grammys. Yes. So this obscure Grammys, there's a bunch of guys. I'm old and I like metal music, so I don't know any of the people we're talking about here. There's a Billy eyelash, some kind of bunny involved. I think we'll eventually get to a very short man giving a speech. But ultimately it looks like a lot of these people who showed up to the awards ceremony were trying to virtue signal, oh, Donald Trump, I can't believe ultimately that he was out there going after illegal aliens. We see Bad Bunny here saying, before I say thanks to God, I'm going to say ice out, Bad Bunny said, while accepting a Grammy Award for Best Musical Urbana Album. Music Urbana. Yeah, sure. Yeah, why not? What's it titled? Please don't attempt to make me a title. What's it titled? I can't see that. Can you read it out for us? I believe it's a clack-clack cloak. But yeah, no, it's a little difficult to make out. It's not American. But yeah, we're seeing a lot of this. We kind of expected these events the entire, no one cares about the music, no one cares about the speeches, the awards. No one can just say thanks God and I really love my country. It's got to be about hating the current thing. So I guess not surprising that this is the way they're conducting themselves. But let's hear Peter Dinklage here, an amazing star of screen and stage telling us about this beautiful poem. It's a poem by Amanda Gorman from René de Hogue Good, Killed by Ice on January 7th, 2026. They say she is no more, but there her absence roars, blood blown like a rose. Ice wheels flinched and froze. Now bare riot of candles, dark curia flowers, pure howling of hymns. If for us, your rose, somewhere in the pitch deep of our grief, crunches our power, the howl where we begin, streaming upon the edge of the crooked crater of the worst of what we've been. Change is only possible in all the greater when the labor and bitter anger of our neighbors is moved by the love and better angels of our nature. What they call death and void, we know his breath and voice. In the end, gorgeously endures our enormity. You could believe departed to be the dawn when the blank night has so long stood. But our bright, blooded angels will never be fully gone when they forever are so fiercely good. It's a little short temper from on, geez. Yeah, look, as I know, Peter Dinklage hasn't had to act. We all saw the last season of Game of Thrones in a while, but how did he not bother to even memorize like a couple of lines in a poem? Like he's just sitting there reading off his phone like he's some high schooler giving a presentation in like an interstate school. That was his big opportunity. I mean, this is probably the biggest platform he's had since Game of Thrones right now, us showing this video. So he's expecting slam poetry, but it's like a light tap reading. I still like to work with you, Pete. As far as the Grammys go, I haven't been a fan of the Grammys. I've had problems with the Grammys since like 1989 when Metallica lost to Jethro Tull. That's a mean fluke. OK, we should minimize Peter here. You know, I mean, this is a tiny part of a bigger story. They've done nothing since to redeem themselves. They didn't talk about Vinnie Paul the year that he died in the memoriam. They didn't talk about Allie Herbert, our guitar player that died in the memoriam. They didn't talk about Brett Hines in memoriam this year. The Grammys have always treated metal like, you know, basically like the red-headed stepchild. Sorry, Tate. But like they've always been like that. And it's so for me as a guy, you know, you understand this as a guy that's into metal and stuff, they've never been good. It's always just a contest of who has the best connections behind the scenes. Tom Morello's on the voting. What is it? The voting panel or whatever. So I don't have anything good to say about the Grammys. They've been terrible. Like I said, for me, since 1989, when they decided that Jethro Tull should win over Metallica. I found these award ceremonies to be more political, like popularity contests. If they like you, it's like, oh, it's your year to win now, Ian. You've been so patient. You've said your lines and not talked out of turn for 30 years. Here's your lifetime achievement award and we'll give you an Oscar. But because of that, I'm not surprised when they go hive mind and start repeating all the garbage that you see on MSNBC. It doesn't surprise me. There was they did have a like shockingly pro white move. If you was like a decade ago, and I was like 2015, 2016 is like for rap fans, like five of the greatest rap albums ever released came out that year. It's like Kendrick Lamar, some of these other artists, but Macklemore won album of the year. And if you know Macklemore, iconically white rapper. And so that was like kind of the last pro white move, I think from the Academy Awards. Was that before after his song about how great gay marriage is? Yeah, didn't he have a gay uncle who killed himself or something? I think it was something like that. He's just from Seattle. That stuff happens a lot there. But since then, it's just been really a lot of gay marriage or suicide. One leading to the other. They're connected. You know, I wrote a book called the total state and one of the big topics in that book is ultimately why we need to see politics just penetrate every cultural sphere. A lot of people are asking, you know, the basic question, you know, why do we need politics in my video games? Why does it have to be in my movies? Why does it have to be in my music? You know, there used to be there. There was always some injection. There's always one guy firing off his opinion and acceptance speech. But for the most part, they at least put on the air of, OK, no, this is an event about the music, about the topic we're discussing. But once you get to this kind of late stage of your culture where everything is a political battle where the rift is just so large and the state needs more and more control over the population, what they're thinking. The only thing you can really do is just have that total. Is something with Tourette's? No, I mean, you're like right now we're on Rumble. It's showing Ian looking at his phone. So they're saying we're back on Rumble. We're back on YouTube. There we go. Dude, you guys missed Adam Johnson whipping it out on stage. Yeah, it was kind of crazy. There was a hog reveal and you guys missed it. Adam, what did you say you said something cool? Oh, I said I was born as crooked. I'm playing my father, whoever he is. I'm sorry, you were born white? What? So what you're saying before the show locked up, what I was saying is I agree with you about inserting politics into culture and all these things because you have to. You know, the world is politicizing, but to do it subtly because some artists are so hit you over the head with it. It's like, if I don't wear my MAGA hat, you're not going to get it. It's like, you know, you can be subtle. I don't want people on the left to understand that I'm propagandizing them. I don't want people on the right to know that I'm propagandizing. So one of the things that allows art to be subtle is a shared cultural tabestry, right? And one of the problems, the reason that we're seeing everything become so obvious is we're losing that shared fabric that allows us to provide nuance. They have to make sure that they kind of state outright what they mean because maybe you're a red stator and you don't know all the blue code or maybe you're a blue stator and you don't know all the red code. Now, the conservatives have been bad at art for a while, but the fact that the left is getting like obviously very bad at it very quickly is actually a big problem. And the fact that it's getting very quickly is actually a win for us overall because it means that the implicit left coding that allowed them to kind of suddenly massage their messages into our culture no longer works. Now, with you, I'd rather have my art convey shared cultural messages, but if the only shared cultural messages are like chopping kids, you know, genitals off, then it's okay. Well, it comes down to obvious. Fair enough. Well, yes, it is true. It is better when you can be subtle. But if you want to send a message, it's you do have to be fairly clear. And if you're not some, you know, for a lot of people, if you're not specifically overtly saying something, they're going to internalize it as as something that they relate to. And honestly, that's kind of what you want. Listen, when you write a song, you want people to listen to the song and you want them to to think of it as their own, right? When you listen to music that you love, you think about like, where did you hear the song first? Like what were the circumstances in your life? There are songs that I love. And every time I hear them, you know, when I haven't heard it for a long time, I remember what it smelled like when I was listening to that song for the first time a lot. And so those, those kind of memories are something that's attached to music and you don't want to take that away from people. But at the same time, if people find out or when people realize that you weren't saying what they thought you were saying, they get very upset and they feel like they've taken something from them, even though it was never something that was offered to them in the first place. So it's, I think it comes down to is the connotation of words, right? I mean, progressives will always progress their ideology, right? Conservatives will stick and serve what we usually do is actually concede. And it starts with, it starts with connotations of inocular, right? It's the, it's, we wouldn't like abortion. It's, you know, it's safe, rare and legal and conservatives say, well, that's, that's fair. You know, we don't want someone who was, you know, raped or incest before us to have a child. And then they move that word, right? It's no longer, you know, you know, it now it's women's health care, right? When initially it was just murder, that's, that's where we all agreed as human beings, when you take away the life of something, that's what it is. We concede these words to the left and eventually we no longer have common ground because as they progress, they get further and further away from that common ground, that, you know, that, that soft working of words of, would it be cool if X, Y, Z? Well, and this is the nature of the conservative liberal dynamic, right? Conservatives, or right, the right really creates in that moment of founding the civilization. The right are the people who are going to cut, you know, civilization out of the wilderness. They're going to fight back the barbarians. They're the people who are going to establish the norms and the rules, the strong culture, the strong religion, the strong understanding. They are the ones that initially build. And then the left are the ones that start iterating. They start looking for different ways to combine. They look for different processes that they can manipulate. In some ways, this is ultimately positive. You need your, your institutions to grow and change over time, be able to overcome new problems. But they do that by unspooling the nature of the society that exists in the first place. The left is largely entropic, right? It is breaking down order constantly. And that's where it generates its energy. So whenever it runs out of things to deconstruct, to destroy, to break apart, that's when it peters out. And that's when the right tends to rush back in and reconstitute that order. But that is the cycle of not just civilization, but even things like art and culture. So like the right now, as far as I can tell, the internet is allowing cultures around the world to obliterate the American conservative nature, the nature, conservative nature of the United States, because it's just getting hit from every angle by so many things and then immigration. And so there's like a rapid iteration redux. It feels like going on right now. Yeah. So funny enough, Karl Marx was actually used to say that he was pro free trade. And the joke of why he was pro free trade is he thought it brought brought down cultural barriers faster. And the faster you dissolved cultures and traditions, the faster you could get rid of nations and create the communist utopia, the global order. And in a way what we're seeing with the internet is the vast increase democratization and velocity of exchanges of information in the way that we saw with capital previously. And so all these things that used to give you shared culture are now like immediately dissolved by like this constant pattern of information and everything. And so I think what you're going to continue to see is like this, this destruction of existing cultures, and it's the people who are ultimately able to control that process. And again, I think we had this conversation last time we were on here, but this is why China and others are working so hard to so quickly trying to control internet and information as radically as possible, because if they don't ultimately they will dissolve to even these communist authoritarian structures will break down under the constant wave and an increase of velocity of information. So I think we've gotten pretty far away from from the Grammys. But the point being is like I think that's why ultimately we're seeing the internet interact with kind of national identities and why the left is continue to break down who they think we are, but in the same instance they're breaking their own ideas and culture down just as quickly. Yeah, in the grand irony before we go to the next story that the Grammys was the kind of the epicenter of cultural cohesion for a long time. Us everybody getting together on Thursday night to watch the Grammys and then the next day at work you talk about what song one I heard that on the radio last week. But now that's very same institution that was supposed to kind of centralize us to remember something together is sporadic. It feels like I don't even know what song I don't even know if I knew any song at the Grammys. I don't even know if I've heard it because I don't listen to the radio. Spirit Box performance was great. I'll say that much. I didn't know they were there. Yeah. Okay, well that might have been worse. So they're heavy metal band there. You know, they're good. But I will say it's likely that the only reason that that particular heavy metal band was performing is because they have a female singer. That's correct. Yeah. They should have gone with Seven Kingdoms, better female lead singer. Yeah. All right, guys. Well, we also want to talk a little bit about some more happenings in Minneapolis. The left, of course, was talking for years and years about the need for body camps and all of a sudden after finally getting what they wanted most, they've recognized that that's a huge mistake coming from CBS News. All federal immigrant immigration agents in Minneapolis will begin by wearing body cameras. Secretary of Homeland Security, Christine Ohm said on Monday as the department faces intense scrutiny over a pair of fatal shootings by federal agents in the Twin Cities. Effective immediately, we are deploying bodycams to every officer in the field in Minneapolis, Noam said on X, writing that she had discussed the move with the heads of immigration customs enforcement and border protection. So obviously, we've been making this joke for a long time, but the call for body cameras has been the largest self-owned the left has ever had in history. All the cops were racist. All of them were brutal. And of course, we do see that. And I'm glad that ultimately we do have footage for when the police are stepping out of line. But the majority of what we're seeing is actually the police are largely justified. The bodycams are vindicating most of the actions. And so the fact that the left has seen what a disaster this is and now they're trying to actively fight against those bodycams really is one of the just most beautiful things you've seen a long time. That's worth noting the fact that there are so many leftists that are saying, no, these are actually bad and they're contributing to stereotypes and we should stop this now. Yeah, they're like, oh, it's an invasion of privacy because they're going to record these guys when they shouldn't be interacting with them in the first place. Trump said it perfectly is just like, this is the best thing that ever happened to law enforcement was the body cameras because it just showed that they were justified every single time in paraphrasing what he said. So it'd be the same thing with ICE. It's like, okay, maybe these fatal shootings who really knows what happens because it's really the ICE agents word versus the person who's not there anymore. So with the police or with sorry with the body camera, I think it's going to put away a lot of these high profile, you know, deaths or whatever. So I just love that they're saying, oh, the bodycams are enforcing stereotypes like, huh, maybe the perpetrator should stop enforcing stereotypes. No, it's the camera. The camera made them do it. I'm sure you experienced that. The camera just compelled you. Magnet. I mean, it is it I do think that this is going to be a good thing overall because like you said, you know, when it does show that the the officers or agents have have stepped out of line, you know, we can do something about it because you do want police to behave in appropriate ways. But I think that in the long run, it's going to show that the police largely behave in appropriate ways and the people that are, you know, people that are being arrested are the problem. The people that are going to say that the police are the problem are going to say that the police are the problem, no matter what you had the shooting of what's in the pretty wife. You know, his first name is Alex pretty pretty. Say his name. There were like, I will not. There were like six or seven different angles of that of that shooting. And people are just like, no, you see this is this is of course this is police brutality, blah, blah, blah, it's so wrong, etc. And it doesn't matter what you show them. They're going to do I mean, just like you say all the time, it's friend enemy distinction. That's it's that's the way that the left operates. And so if you're on the left, you're going to say, well, this and then and and if you have an answer for that particular argument, well, they'll change the argument. Just move the goalpost and that's the way they champion Luigi shooting the United Health Care. Yeah, so they would champion Alex shooting an ice officer. That's that's that's who they are. So funny enough, you saying they say say his name, say her name. Have you seen the left struggle sessioning all the white leftists saying, oh, no, say her name. That's only for that's only for black women. We only say the name of black women. So even if you martyr yourself, like even if you literally die for the cause as a white person, you are still such scum to these people that they're like, no, we're not going to say we're not going to honor you. All right, martyrs will be named Robert Poulsen. There was literally that guy, the guy that like lit himself on fire for Palestine and like in uniform and literally there was a viral tweet with like 60 70 K likes that was like, yeah, but this guy had no problem taking a paycheck from the institution that was like harming, you know, people in the middle. So like you literally could light yourself on fire and they would still dunk on you. I also love that I forget that that happened until someone brings up every time. Like we will remember you for the cause. No, they won't care. I'm not even being facetious. I do not remember his name. No, no. Don't run anymore. I do, but I won't say it. The reason I part of the reason why I look because it's for black women, Paul. It's for black women. What are the reasons why I remembered is I have a great little clip about it where it's just just totally demolishes his his his performance and I'll send it to you guys later. I just feel bad for all those virgins waiting for him. It's 72 trans women. Yeah, so it's quite the let down. I want to get body cameras that are 360 on these cops. So like you can go on like YouTube 360 and like spin your spin around. See, but would that give away too much information? Like now you know who's approaching the cop from behind, like how to get closer to a cop when he's not looking like or would that just be good, good analytics. Can they live stream? I would pay for a subscription. That is kind of fun. So that is actually an interesting question. It like does the body cam regularity of body cams create a scenario where you're giving away techniques, giving away information intelligence, right? Like that's something that you worry about constantly in a warfare scenario. You don't want to think about our urban environments like that. But that is a real concern to think about ultimately because we see that these guys are operating their autonomous zones. We're running your plates through the system. They're already mimicking all the things they think ice is doing. What if they're just using that body cam footage as some kind of game film to figure out how they should be behaving or how they could trap, trick an ice agent, lure them in to a bad situation because they've watched how that film is played out before. I think that's a possibility that a lot of people haven't considered when it comes to the body cam. It's another example of liberalism getting taken advantage of by authoritarianism. Like it's a very good act of faith to have your police officers linked up to a camera. Like you're putting some, you know, some responsibility on these guys, some accountability. And the downside of that is if some autocrat wants to come and ruin the system, they've got a better information about how to do it. We've got Trump here talking about the body cams. Let's check on that real quick. Enforcement because people can't lie about what's happening. So it's generally speaking, I think 80% good for law enforcement. But if he wants to do that, I'm okay with it. That was it. So we're taking deep fakes. So how long until they get a deep fake body cam? Or has it already happened? Well, there is a real info hazard of just AI body cams wrecking people, right? Like, oh, well, it looks like body cam footage. I would immediately accept it because of the graininess or the way that it plays out. And then all of a sudden that goes viral completely changes the story. You assume that it's legitimate because it looks like it's from a body cam. It doesn't look like just an average cell phone or something else that's easily manipulated. That's a real problem. Bro, we just saw the picture of that guy's face get AI manipulated. Right, right. And next phase will be a completely made up human. It gets assaulted by a police officer. There are riots in a street somewhere. MSNBC picks up the story, runs the image of this completely doctored fictitious event in the fake person. So this is a really thing, like this is a very Bodriardian moment. Like what happens when you have your first riot for a fake victim? Like not in the civil rights. Yeah, sure. I'm sure that guy got knocked down in the 1980s, but like an actual completely computer generated human being. Does that kind of similar? Yes, that is absolutely the similar. Well, they had an AI video come out where it was Renee Good complying. She was just, yes, officer, yes. And then steps out of the car. So it's like we could have the first AI exoneration where it stops a riot. I don't know. I'm just bit falling here. I've never seen that video. I wanted to bring it up. That's an amazing video. You could teach your kids. I don't think this ever stopped a riot. So what we do is we black bag the commies and then we put their admissions of their loyalty to Trump out like Winston from 1984, except it's just their AI representation, right? Like they disappear, but oh look, before he went off to that island in Tahiti, he definitely endorsed President Trump's right. Yeah, yeah. And then we do for like the any events, we have holdouts left as we could have Maduro singing the I will vote for Donald Trump song with the Cuban saying and then plaster on a Goodyear blimp and flight over Caracas and any loyalists will come out and be like, oh, well, clearly I'm being bamboozled here. I should be supporting President Trump. Oh, what's the Bodrian? You said Bodrian. So Jean Bodrian was a French philosopher who wrote a simulation and similar lacrim, which is the book that they the Wachowski's read before the matrix before they did that. But it's also like a much deeper study on like the nature of creating false realities and hyper hyper reality is a term you might have heard that came out of Bodriard. He may he may basically I think he made the argument that the Iraq war never happened. That's the one of his famous out of this. So it's it's not the like war things happened, right? There was actually combat. But because in war, you don't know who's going to win, right? In a real war, you don't know who's going to win. There's a chance that one side will outsmart the other. But there was no chance that Iraq was going to win the first Gulf War. Like everyone knew it. The United States was going to go in and do what they wanted. So it wasn't really a war. So the argument was it was a simulation of a war. The Iraq war never actually happened because there was no war because it looked like war and there were war things. But real wars are are they're not predetermined. There's there's the possibility of someone else winning. So well, and it's also not experienced by the wider population. They only see it on the television screen. It's all abstract. And in a way, you could say the protests in Minnesota never happened, right? Because how many people really are experienced and how many people really understand what's going on? All of your reality is being absorbed through social media, through clips, throughout of context, understandings. You don't know anybody who's been there. You know people who if you're if you were alive in the 1950s, you knew people went through World War Two. You could talk to people, you probably experienced it. Everyone you knew experienced it. It was a real war in the sense that people you knew had direct experience when it came to, you know, different civil rights struggles or nationwide protests. They were real in the sense that everyone saw them happen. But when you have these small focused hyper media concentrated scenarios, it's all abstract. It's all removed. Nobody has direct understandings of what's going on. So what do we end up doing? All end up debating the hyper realities we're experiencing rather than actually discussing the facts on the ground and what we have experienced as people. Yeah. And that's that's kind of what societies become like. Everything is a simulation of reality to some degree nowadays or for the most, the vast majority of people's lives now are a simulation of reality because we experience it through screens as opposed to going out and doing things and experiencing it firsthand. Literally everything we're talking about tonight is through simulation. Yes. Yeah. We we are debating the simulacrum in a very real sense. Yes. We're part of the problem. Yeah. And the solution, I think. We should all be wearing body cameras while we're alive. I heard this conspiracy theory that Charlemagne, you guys probably heard he was the first Holy Roman Emperor was a radio host. Yeah. Charlemagne the God. Yeah. But in the year all of a sudden the Catholic Church was like it's the year 1000 and there was a guy named Charlemagne that was your first Holy Roman Emperor and we've always controlled this land for four years. I don't know if it's real, but it's like considering the simulacrum and just like foisted history. Was it Gregory that took 18 days out of the calendar? Well, to be fair, he really did kill the Saxons until they converted Christianity. That was not a simulation. So that was very real. We that type of leadership. I'm still not over the Norman conquest. It makes me so mad. Condolences. Really? I was like, I'm like, okay, can we handle the Norman? Something was taken from you. Yes. Anglo-Saxon society. They just went in there and they were just like. The Norman yoke just weighs on my shoulder. So now I'm thinking about we're settling. Just really want to bring back that prima nocturne. I know. Things were. We'll probably go there. I don't know. We talked about the Grammys. Billy Eilish said, you know, you can't you can't take stole. We can't. No one can claim stolen land and there are no borders. So like it was a contradiction, I think, in what she said, you know, there's no borders, but the land has been stolen. But like if there's no borders, then there's nothing to steal. Right. We're all about to colonize Mars and the moon. So like, what do we do? How do we do this? Is it whoever gets there first gets to have it? Yes. And then they'll just kill anyone that tries to take it. And that's just how it's always going to be. Yeah. We own the moon. Right. We own the moon or flag was there first. That's how it works. 100%. We're on a race to colonize. There's not really a race like the United States is going to send up the Artemis rocket and the end of the week or something like that. And then a few months later, I guess the Artemis is going to actually go up and land and we'll start building the first moon base up there. Maybe we can talk about it on the after show. There's a whole other conversation, moon settlement. Because I also have an idea of how to defend the moon, but it's not YouTube friendly. Lasers? I wish. Much hotter. A swimming contest? Are you going to talk about the Golden Dome? I just I learned about the Golden Dome. The Golden Dome is not just land based. I learned there. What are you looking at having satellites that are involved in that? Well, Reagan called that Star Wars. The project's been around for a while. 35 years ago, it was less realistic than it is today. That's true. That's true. Anyhow. Oh, that took a left hand turn. You know. Yeah, Reagan was a left hand path. All right, guys. Well, we also want to talk about other deportation efforts. There's been rumors that the Trump administration is going to ramp up its efforts. Not just towards the Somali population in Minnesota, but also looking at the Haitian population. Over 300 groups are asking Donald Trump and his administration to reverse course on ending the Haitian temporary protected status. Hundreds of organizations, including civil rights groups, labor unions, immigrants, rights advocates and faith leaders nationwide are urging President Trump and leaders of the Department of State and Homeland Security to preserve temporary immigration status for Haitians. The calls come amid a growing fear and anxiety over the fate of more than 300,000 Asians who could lose temporary protected status benefits as of 1259 Tuesday if a federal judge does not intervene. Now, the most impressive part of this has been the hilarious Democrats who have been going out there and warning giving press conferences. They've been saying insane stuff like, please, whatever you do, don't send them back. Come back. Haiti is a dangerous place. You can't send Haitians to Haiti. What? Sending these people back to Haiti is basically a death sentence. And that's why we were asking the administration to open up their hearts and to extend this TPS. Sending these and to extend these two hearts. Still looks great for 70. I have a theoretical question for you. If a country is dangerous because it's full of people from that country, if you bring the people of that country to our country, what happens? Does the magical soil make them not dangerous? No, pets go missing. Magic soil. We're asking Dominicans about Haiti. I mean, talk about Israel-Palestine. We have it in our hemisphere. The Haitians and Dominicans, they go, well, it's really the Dominican Republic. Yeah, they don't go out. They're just like, don't touch the wall. Yeah, literally. So you want to see Israel-Palestine looks like a freaking kid's birthday party compared to what the kids do. They can't stand the Haitians. Probably because they keep beating their cats and stuff. For people that don't know, the Dominican Republic and Haiti are on the same island, right? And there is a gigantic wall. The Dominicans are just like, don't come near the wall, Haitians. And if you come near the wall, we will shoot you. And they do. Yeah, so how does the Dominican Republic have a better policy on Haitians in the United States? What is going on? Well, they got- Have you met a Dominican? They're not like- They've not experienced. They've been dealing with it since the beginning. That's true. What's the deal with Haiti? And this isn't a Seinfeld thing. I'm serious. I was like, I hate Haiti. I was like, you can't have a dog there. Go to visit. It was founded on a satanic blood ritual. And I'm not- That's true. That's a joke. Like they just murdered all the white people there and sacrificed them. And yeah, it's cursed. Was it like a revolution? Yeah, yeah, yeah. It was the revolution because it was a French colony, right? The Haitians were working as slaves at the time. So you can understand why they were a little angry at the French given everything that was going on. The reaction was, let's say, John Brown-esque in its disproportionality, except they did it to the entire white population of the island at the time. What year? I don't have the- But they like white people now, right? 1805, it looks. And then they've just been living off the industrial refuse since or something. Not much has improved since then. Well, they're usually run by cannibal warlords. I believe Barbecue is the current- Barbecue, yeah. Legit. He's a respectable member of the international community. Yeah. He's a very respectful and sense of hurricane once a year to clean up the problems. There was the family guy bit where Godzilla rolled up to Port-au-Prince and he was like, oh, oh, oh, and slowly retreated into the water. I've made a terrible mistake. I see I'm not needed here. They've already destroyed everything. Yeah, no, it's really something that they're just like, this country is so unbelievably violent that even the people that flopped out of the country by all accounts wouldn't be able to go back. That's the whole thing. I think it was Matt Walsh. He made the point where he's like, usually people coming from the third world are the ones that actually flopped out of the country. They're not the top performers. These people couldn't cut it in Guatemala. So now they're coming to the US. And it's the same thing with the Haitians. These aren't the top performers making it over here. Those guys are running things in Haiti. These are the people that are literally at the bottom of the barrel and they're out of desperation to try and sneak into the US. Well, we tried to help them several times. There were earthquakes back and God was it, oh, six? Oh, six, something like that. 2010. 2010, the Clinton Foundation came in, was supposed to take care of all of these people. And all their children disappeared? Something like that. Something like that. So we have tried to help. Billions and eight were lost. Maybe we can still send the Clintons next time. It says after Haiti had the independence in 1804, they had to pay 25 billion back to France and it destroyed their economy. And then the US took control of the country from 1915 to 34 in trenching for control. That's all. And then it goes on and on. The whole idea, because this is what these third world activists, they always blame France for Haiti's despair and they'll be like, oh, it's this massive debt they hold over them. But it's Haitians A. And then B, they miss the payments all the time. It wasn't like they actually made these payments at all. It's like France is doing it right now. That's a dangerous stereotype to say they don't pay the bills on time. The credit is terrible. It's not anyone's fault. It's worth noting that there is a lot of people who are not paying the bills on time. It's worth noting that there is a lot of people who are not paying the bills on time. It's not anyone's fault. It's worth noting that there is a lot of people who are not paying the bills on time. It's worth noting that there is a 365 day growing season in that country, right? Yeah, literally. Even if you were just an agricultural country and based on just that, they should be able to produce enough not only to trade with other countries, but to feed everybody in Haiti. They don't. They eat each other sometimes. Have you had vegetables? So you had Haitians? I mean, I was in prison. So we do have some breaking news here. It looks like a federal judge temporarily blocked the end of protections for Haitians in the U.S. The ruling pauses the Trump administration's plan to end a program that allowed more than 350,000 people from Haiti to remain in the United States. A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from ending a humanitarian for more than 350,000 Haitians who have been able to live and work in the United States under what is known as temporary protected status. So no surprise there. Another activist judge says, of course, you can't deport people who shouldn't be here. That would mean you have some kind of, I don't know, executive power. It's like you were elected to do something. It's my job, of course, to stop you immediately. Now, you'll never guess what she looks like. If I was in the most icily Cantina, would that help me guess her name? It helps. Oh, no. Okay. All right. The other direction. Yeah. On the left. Exactly. Yeah. She looks like a good boy. Yeah. So the temporary protected status here we see in the article is a designation that's created by the U.S. government and can give to countries grappling with national disasters, armed conflicts, or other acute crisis, make conditions in their country particularly dangerous. There's only one problem. That's just Haiti all the time. That's just an excuse to move all of Haiti here all the time. And guys, we were talking about this a little bit in the behind the scenes, the green room beforehand. But I think this is a big shift because previously when we talked about immigration, conservatives, Republicans, they were always terrified even to talk about immigration restriction. But one of the things they were very careful about was always making about the individual. It's about the individual person. We can't judge groups. We can't talk about groups. We can't prefer groups. We have to judge each individual on their own. And instead, what we're seeing is increasingly conservatives are comfortable saying, no, there are countries, peoples, religions, traditions that are not compatible with us, that are not ultimately going to help the U.S. is not going to contribute to the overall well-being of the American people. So whether it's Somalia or Haiti or whatever country we're looking at, if ultimately we deem that country to not be worth our time, to not be contributing, it's okay to just say blanket, no, we are not interested in having people from that country here. And I think that's actually a monumental shift in the rhetoric and framing when it comes to the immigration issue. Implicit bias saves lives. That's it. That's it. I think if you live your life in whatever bubble you live in, you have a pretty good idea of who you surround yourself with and the actions that was around you. And if you formulate opinions based on your own bubble, and those opinions happen to be what some people call racist, I would say, well, you go live in those places and live around the same people. But there is a reason why people do self-select and self-sort throughout the entire country. There is. There is. People like to be safe and like to be around like-minded people. And that's not terrible. That's not a terrible thing. I like people that I have things in common with. Yeah, literally. This is the whole thing, because it's great that we're able to address Haitians and Somalians and stuff. But it's downstream from the real conclusion that we should be coming to, which is the demographic composition of your country is a very valid discussion to have. For whatever reason, people in the West aren't allowed to have that, but pretty much every other country is allowed to have a conversation like, what do I want my culture to look like? What do I want my country to look like? The actual composition of the country. You always in the United States have to predicate it with some economic argument or perhaps that they're just extremely violent, which is true. And those are arguments that I use myself. But even if they were just top performers, I should still be able to say, for example, like the Chinese maybe, I'd be like, well, yeah, but that still changes my country. And I would like my country, my kids, my grandkids, the country to look like my country. I agree. We're not honest people. I think that's because if I had a choice to send my kids to a school that's on MLK versus a school that's not on MLK, I mean, I'm definitely choosing the school not on MLK. Yeah. I mean, look, I think the Chinese argument or the China argument is a little different. I think it's a bad example because China is an adversary and every single Chinese person that has family in China, every single Chinese person here that also has family in China is a could be compromised because they will apply pressure to their family, throw them in jail to get the people that are here. So I understand the point you're making, but when it comes to China, they're absolutely an adversary and the idea that they're in any way should be partnered with or anything. It is a terrible idea. Every single Chinese person with family back home is compromised currently and it should be completely obvious to any serious government that that's the case. So we should do everything we can to make sure that we send Chinese people back to China because they will absolutely be used against us by their own government. We got to stop apologizing. That's the end of this conversation. We have to stop apologizing. We have to understand where we are, how we got here, and the exact opposite. And we can't be apologetic about it. I know it's going to get messy. People's lives will be lost at the end of this, but what is the alternative? That's the real question is everything has been half-measures up to this point. As Phil has even said, how can we even treat our government as serious if they're not going to expel Chinese students, Chinese nationals who are here? We know for a fact we just busted a few Chinese nationals smuggling things in and out of the United States, scientific secrets, bringing biological weapons or biological material that's dangerous in the United States. This is not some isolated incident. This is a common occurrence and yet we never address it because we want the money. That's what Trump said. Right? Straight up. We need them to fund our universities, which is garbage because obviously we want Americans to go to our universities. And it's fine if a few of those collapse because ultimately they're just teaching children to hate their parents and to hate America anyway. So ultimately that wouldn't be some travesty if we lost it. But we can look to a different example. We could look to someone like Japan, who is a true ally, who I think most people would feel very comfortable saying is an advantage and an honorable culture. I would say that's a culture worth admiring, but it's still not my culture. I want Japan to be Japanese in 50 years and I want America to be American. And that doesn't mean I don't love Japanese culture. I don't think they're awesome. I don't respect it. It just means I respect it so much I want it to exist. And the same thing is true of the United States. And as you're saying, we should be able to say that that's okay. We are a people in a place living in a certain way and there is no reason to pretend that we're the only civilization history that's entirely abstract, entirely ideological. You can just change out the people and nothing matters. No, I'm sorry. Our culture is great. Our principles are great. Our way of life is great, but it comes from the people. It comes from the tradition we have grown up in and you cannot simply bring someone from Haiti or Somalia in and just slap them into some American university, give them a social security number and call it a day. That does not make them an American. We're called the melting pot, right? That's fine. Not all immigration is terrible. I think we have some great immigrants here who actually love our country, who escaped communism. That's I want those people. People are great, right? But if we are, if we're a melting pot, then we're a solution, right? Our solution, and if there's a falset of migrants coming in, alleles coming in, you're going to supersaturate that solution. The whole thing has to be titrated still and then fixed where we're at supersaturation. It's time to still figure out what makes America the good parts of America. Keep that and get rid of the rest. You got to let it melt. Like you bring these pieces and parts into the pot, but if it's too many, too fast, you got a chunky mess, so you have to spend. People need to homogenize. That's why we say about the individual, you bring one person in, surround them with Americans that are indoctrinating them 10 years, 15 years, they're probably going to be pretty American. But if you bring 500 Haitians in and they're surrounding one American, it's a completely inverted scenario where this one guy is going to potentially develop sympathies or become Haitian minded. You get ethnic on clips. We even had this problem with Ellis Island immigration, when the Ellis Island wave of immigrants came in. These are coming from countries that were very close to the United States culturally speaking, as far as like, I mean, you had Irish, Italian, it's only like big massive difference they had from other Western European countries that they're Catholic, not Protestant. Even they had like a lot of issues assimilating. Like they would create these massive ethnic enclaves, these gangs, they would have, they basically took over the Democrat party in a lot of ways. And so we had these massive problems with Ellis Island and we make it out on the other side. And instead of like rubbing around and be like, wow, we made out of that in one piece, we're like, notes make it worse and just like expand the definition of who should come here. The problem is every time we bring that up, the left treats that is like, oh, we can assimilate people. No, that's proof that you could just barely assimilate people close to you. We forget the fact that the Germans had to be forced to break up many of their ethnic neighborhoods that they had often had to, their kids had to be sent to schools to learn English because they did not want to assimilate. There was an active, like just Germans who we think of as pretty American at this point in the United States were putting internment camps along with the Japanese during World War II for the fear that some of them might be traders. It wasn't that long ago where these were very foreign people. And we shut down immigration for like 40 years too, didn't we? Yeah, because it took two wars from the finally buy their ticket. Like, OK, you have stake here. Like, OK, we got it. These people now literally just rock up. There's like no back. Like there's no way for them to actually buy stake in the country in any tangible way. They're just really here to benefit. When you look at it, they have outsized welfare participation. I mean, it's just unbelievable. Everywhere you look, it's just the every single argument you could possibly make for mass migration is just false, flatness. I was I was in like that liberal mind spiral in like 2006, seven, eight. And and I was very much I like culture bombing. I like going to a neighborhood that is not my culture and becoming the culture of that neighborhood and then meeting all the locals. And they look up to me and they want to be more like the American. And I love doing that. But that I'm realizing, like, so do other people. They love coming here and they love just changing Americans the way I like to change whoever in little Italy or whatever. Now you're American, like, yeah. So it's a double edged blade, that desire to change people's culture. Yeah, I was reading online about a Japanese tourist who came to Los Angeles and was really disappointed to find that there was like virtually no Americans at the places he was visiting. And that made me pretty sad because I'm like, I'm so proud of the United States and so proud of my culture and et cetera, that I do want tourists to come here and be like amazed by what we are, what we have and sort of our people and that sort of thing. And I found that story really heartbreaking. Like, you know, a lot of people laughed at this and they're like, wow, that really shows the state of Los Angeles. And I'm like, yeah, because they're not going to I mean, no offense, but they're not going to visit Nebraska. Like they're going to visit Los Angeles, they're going to visit New York City, they're going to visit Chicago. These places should be dripping in American culture to where a Japanese person, you know, whoever arrives to visit for a week and they're like blown away by how rich and deep our culture is and it's just not happening anymore. I've noticed in tourist spots, though, I travel quite a bit and like even when I go to these places that are very tourist type, like there is not a lot of me there. Right. There's not a lot of me there. And it worries me because like it's just because we're working to pay for everyone to be here because where where are people like me? You're they're running away. Right. Like this is the the key. You got to remember that even the phrase, the melting pot is accepting leftist propaganda. Like this was a phrase that was worked out by a Jewish playwright, was adopted by a lot of culturally influenced people. But ultimately, even though Teddy Roosevelt took a look at it, he he decided to reject it. He said he wanted something that understood that America was more of a consistent culture. You could still add people to it was never the idea that no one could join. But understanding that these people are simulating to your culture. You're not bringing their culture in. They have to completely immerse themselves. They have to be completely willing to become part of your group. That that's what matters. And so that's the thing that you need to keep in mind. This is why classic immigration, classic assimilation was always considered to be multi-generational, Aristotle and I think Aquinas eventually has talked about three generation immigration and how that allows you to ultimately vet whether or not someone is absorbing the culture. They're going to contribute their interest in actually assimilating and not just creating some kind of ethnic beach head. And that's what allows you. It's the time. It's the investment. It's the multi-generational effort. That's what shows that you're somebody who wants to be part of a culture who wants to be an American. Was a little the formations of little Italy, little whatever, little Korea, all these little homogenized like sub communities. Is was that a newer than adaptation? Because because it sounds like a Teddy Roosevelt. He didn't want those things. Since 18. Was it just like a week? We have no choice. It used to be on a bigger scale. There would be entire regions that were like German speaking, French speaking. Like this was on a larger scale. But yeah, you had like Chinatown pockets. They've always been that way, at least since like the foundation of a lot of these cities. Like San Francisco has always had a Chinatown, these sorts of things. Just because like again, someone arrives here from another country, they're going to want to like be a very natural thing. But if a bunch of Americans moved to China, we'd probably pack into a little spot. So you're saying it used to be New Orleans is still like that. Yeah. New Orleans. It used to be just like a huge section of foreigners, Germans here, Norwegians here. This is why you still see the Dutch in certain parts. This is why you still see these different cultures still manifest themselves in the the the the Midwest or the the the northeast. You can continually see the kind of the ethnic imprint. But the difference is America was forming at that time and we had to fill a lot of land. We had to conquer. We had an entire or entire continent, basically, that we needed to take over. Because if we didn't, some other European power was going to do it. Right. And so we had to fill that land. That's why you saw so many large ways of immigration, especially as we pushed west, because if we just simply didn't put physical bodies in those areas, I mean, think about what's still happening near the Mexican border, right? We never truly populated those areas. And so, in a way, kind of just whether we draw these kind of artificial lines or not, the natural barrier of the people who live there actually dictates who owns what area of any given nation. So we were that way when we were forming, but we're beyond that now. And it's OK to say this was the way we had to be when we were becoming a nation. But now that we've done that, we're something else. You know, the Rome started as a collection of these and criminals who came together. Originally, I don't think that's how they ultimately defined themselves a thousand years later, saying, well, we were founded by these and criminals. So that's just who we are. They understood that there are different moments in their history. They went from being a kingdom to a republic to an empire. And it's OK as Americans to realize, OK, there was a moment where large scale immigration and kind of these ethnic enclaves were a part of who we are. But now we have to unify and we have to become something else. And we no longer need to bring in, you know, 20, 30, 40 million people to conquer the frontier. There is no frontier anymore. So we don't have to act that way. So I think like a half million Germans on the frontiers is like not the same as like Bengali neighborhoods in the biggest city in our country. Once we need to populate Mars and we're in a rush to lay bodies down on the surface, we'll just be like, look, we'll send the Haitians. There we go. What's that? We'll send the Haitians. That's what I'm saying. You come to America. We launch you as an American when you land and you're going to pioneer the danger. And if you survive, you can have a plot. I want to be in charge to check in the fuel lines. But, dude, the Chinese are building robots, a robot that can run around in 44 negative 44 degrees. Maybe we could talk about this on the aftershow to populate. I think they're going for robot population. That could be interesting. They're just going to drop hundreds of thousands of robots and be like, try and take it from us. Where? The Chinese just developed some robot that can walk in 40 negative 44 degree winter for like hundreds of miles at a time. It would be kind of exciting if like the moon just turned into like the Battle Bots TV show and it was just like all the countries dropping in robots and just seeing who can beat like like who does like the Czech Republic defense like a rock star robot. They're just like cleaning out house. Oh, dude, what watch? It'll be televised. You're drawn. Yeah, dude, people are going to be watching this. Yeah, dude, like Nigeria. It'll be like cool runnings. Like Jamaica develops just like an insane robot. It has like a weak, vicious clean and house. And then it like runs out of fuel or something like they build the carpet bot that can like take out a bunch of bots and like next week. Oh, yeah, like, yeah, like Afghanistan develops like the goat bot and it's like just blows. So the only thing I'll say about mass immigrant because I think we might be going to super chats pretty soon. The last thing about the immigration, one thing that we could we could do with these people as if they're slave servants to be used is replace the birth rate decline if we're suffering actually a birth rate decline that some of these people that have come here could be used for menial labor or just. Earn your citizenship through work or something. So the problem is that that fails every time because the immigrant population's birth rate drops immediately after a generation or two. So bringing those people in makes them low birth rate faster than they replace your lack of birth rate. So this is always like a temptation, an understandable, logical temptation to solve this problem. But it reliably produces the opposite results because not only do these people become less and less likely to replace themselves, even though they had a higher fertility rate when they came in. They also depressed the fertility rate of the native population. Studies show repeatedly that higher immigration reduces the native fertility. So not only are you making a devil's bargain in the fact that these people are going to tank their own fertility rate, they're also going to tank yours in the process. Do they generally tank their fertility rate just because they assimilate to a culture that has a low fertility rate? Well, there's a couple of things. First, it's modernity. The number one thing that stops fertility that tanks fertility rates is women's liberation and birth control. So the minute they have access to those, the fertility rate immediately drops. You also have the problem that immigrants tend to be strivers. They want to increase their socioeconomic situation. And the classic way to do that is to have fewer children. It's always poor people and rich people who have kids. It's the middle class that usually reduces its fertility rate in order to attempt to climb. So it's just a nexus of factors that are going to basically destroy your attempts to raise the fertility rate through immigration. Would it cover just the general loss of workforce for like a generation? Sure. But it also creates the problem of we're phasing these jobs out as quickly as we can with AI, right? So like, yes, you in theory, you're replacing your workers, but will they have a job long enough for AI not to put them out of business? And when they do, you just brought a bunch of military aged men who are unemployed into your country. What do they do next? Oh yeah, good. Yep. That's where my mind was going to that maybe don't even speak English. Who knows? Right. Okay. Deporting is the solution. Yes. Deportion. And to fix birth rates, ban porn. And good. Yeah. On list. Yeah. I was going to say good border security and good optics. Like put it, you know, don't come, don't come. That's what Kamala Harris told the world. So I think we're okay. We don't come, but then we want to fix the birth. Don't come yet. Can you flush this out? Don't come if you're coming the wrong way. Come the right way. Yeah. Okay. No, that makes sense. That's the message. Trump administration officials watching. Make sure you just said ban porn and you guys are just. Was I being too pornographic? No, porn should be banned. I'm just stimulating. Listen, I'm going to pull out. It's time to. We hit the ding, the dole, the dole. Yeah. Either like a short temper, he had a little, you know, there's some more jokes there too. I'm really disappointed we guys just skimmed past that really quickly. Additional sexual. I just looked right over. Is this the, was this the dwarf lobby coming after you guys? Dang. It's a big dwarf. Little dwarf, actually. They can't afford the big company quite. But no, seriously, like we don't need, we need deporting people. We need more people deported. Yeah, we shouldn't be like, this is kind of counters like a lot of things we say here at 10 guests, but like as Americans, we shouldn't be forced to like have 10 kids a piece just to compete with like four invaders. Like we should be able to deport that. And so someone has two kids. It's not like the end of the world. I'm just saying, like it's kind of crazy. Some of the messaging online is like, let's have a ton of kids to compete with them. And it's like, if you're having kids for political reasons, it's not a good reason to have a kid. Have kids for different reasons. Yeah. Have kids because kids are good. Tax incentives. But like to actually like to, to like to deport deported of illegals should be a totally separate issue. We shouldn't say, oh, well, you know, we should have kids, you know, to replace the people that we deport. No, whether or not we have kids, we should deport the people that are here illegally. It is the solution to all of the problems. Like I said, the mass importation is one of the things that drives down fertility rates. It increases the cost of health care. It increases the cost of housing. It reduces the ability to properly educate the school systems. Get worse. The neighborhoods get more dangerous. Fewer and fewer people are willing to pay the additional cost to move their children, you know, out of a suburban area or to educate them in a good school in those areas. It's just, it's just everything. It is the fix everything button. Deporting the illegals just fixes everything. All we have to do is have the will to make it happen. Are we moving to questions here? Looks like we're going to super chats or yeah, we can if you want. Let's do it. All right here. So it looks like low, low full the red. It's pretty, pretty entertaining seeing people spurt out about Tim's. It's my boot. I voted for it. Comment from the other night. Yeah. What did you guys think about the reaction to that? Some people were supporting it. A lot of people are saying, Oh, look, Tim's the authoritarian now loves it. The people that were critical of it were mostly, you know, kind of Lollbert style people, uh, or the left. And I mean, essentially he's right. You know, the people that voted for Donald Trump voted for deportations. They want to see this. So the idea that it's like, Oh, you know, you're going to get the boot. Like, no, we're not going to get the boot. All we're asking for is again, laws that were passed about immigration in a bipartisan manner to be enforced. That's it. It's not like there's some new laws that have been passed. It's not some crazy, weird policy. This is mundane stuff that countries do. There are other countries where if you go into the country illegally, you go to jail for 10 years. There are some places where you get, you get killed. Like if you go to North Korea and they catch you and you're there illegally, they will kill you. Like deporting people, offering to pay people to leave the country is one of the most magnanimous things that any country has ever done. So the idea that this is somehow beyond the pale, because we won't, we say we want to actually have, uh, you know, border enforcement and make sure that people that are here are only here legally. That's totally ridiculous. The idea that, that the, that the Trump administration is the boot is actually clown world. So I actually just did a show on this with a Jerry Kaufman, who is a, he's a libertarian, but he's like one of the few sane libertarians. He's part of the free state project. He's great. And he's just like, look, libertarians are bad on this because they see any action by the state as a violation because it's just all ideological abstraction. His point was we are doing real libertarianism by ensuring that we have borders that keep out people who won't want to be libertarian. We have our own policies that drive people away, that disincentivize them to be part of this. He recognizes the importance. You could have a libertarian structure inside, as long as you kind of have a nice little authoritarian structure on the outside, keeping the libertarians safe to do their thing. Yeah, I hope you guys were enjoying it. One of my favorite takes by Jeremy, Jeremy Kaufman is he says that he's like, I want people to be able to use heroin. And then if they use heroin in the park, I want Judge Dredd to come and kill them. You know, like there's one of the things that libertarians consistently ignore is the responsibility that comes with liberty. They think that because you want to be free, that there's no responsibilities. And that's not the way liberty works. We're going to let you do what you want, but you do it in public and we're going Singapore on you. Yeah, you know, the rules of engagement have changed. Like it's not the same game. Like I'm glad you're enjoying your debates and going back and forth of who's Buddhist, who's, but they're killing us and throwing us in prison. So I'm sorry, we can work it out in post. You know, I really appreciate you saying that because I'm so tired of this. I hear from people, oh, well, it's not a big deal. And you guys are making all of these threats up and you're, you know, you want conflict, you want civil war. You want, it's like, no, man, I just, you know, you've experienced this. You know that the law is not fair. You know what the two-tier system looks like. You know what it is to be an enemy of the state. And when people don't take that seriously, when they just brush it off, like, oh, the next election will fix that problem. No, you need to be an adult. Like you're in an existential political struggle. So I don't know. Maybe, you know, put a cup on, get out there, some, some cleats, make things happen. Don't give me all these excuses to why it's okay for you to sit on the couch and sit this one out yet again. You gave away the entire country this way. Man up and stop lying to yourself. I consider them cowards who would watch their family be executed. Yeah. Because they want to keep their convictions. It really, it really is absolutely insane. And I don't have time for it anymore. And I'm so tired of these people pretending that that somehow makes you authoritarian or fascist or whatever. I don't know, man. Is the authoritarian, the one who's not dead? Is he not the one whose blood is not like dripping off the wall? OK, well, then I guess I'm that guy. But, you know, moving on. Yeah, what else you got? Right. Like I do. You have to know where you are. That's all there is to it. I'm trying to walk this line between because like I voted for Trump because I wasn't going to vote for the imperialist suggested candidate without any election, you know, Kamala Harris, I'm not voting for that system. True. I didn't vote. I voted. I knew Trump's agenda was to do deportations, but that doesn't mean I was giving him a blank check to do whatever you want to those people. I wasn't like that. I'm like, I want to see what you're going to do. And if you if you step out of what I think is the line, I'm going to say something about it. And but to your point, we're in about am I am I going to authoritarian because I stuff I want to say. But then I'm like, I feel like as part of a media apparatus, I have an obligation to deescalate at every turn. I don't know how you guys feel about that. If you if you aim at that, I'm not accelerating things. I'm showing up to a fire. I mean, that's that's how I consider it. I'm not throwing accelerant. Things are already on fire. I don't think that what people call accelerationism is a good political strategy. You know, there's confusion between that like actual philosophical understandings of technological accelerations. But what people mean by we'll just make things worse and we'll just stoke the rhetoric until like the real moment comes. Like I said, we don't need to do that. Nobody needs to be an accelerationist, guys. You're there. Like you things are already on fire. The fire is already let nobody needs to push us towards that moment. The problem is that people are standing in the middle of fire and saying, this is fine, right? They're just doing the mean like that's the problem is I'm not here to tell anyone to make things worse. I'm just asking people to realize where they are and act like an adult instead of hiding their head in the sand. And when I look back, you know, maybe 10 years now, let's say we actually do win. We actually will power like we should. If we want to win this, look back and say, yeah, we probably could have done things a little bit differently. Yes, but I'll be alive to say that. Yeah, not in prison. So yeah, I will take that route. The thing about Franco is he gets to decide whether or not he went too far in getting rid of the communists because he's still around to think about what would have happened if he hadn't got rid of the communists. I think about like winning because he said winning. I don't know what would that look like to you first is my question. And then I'll tell you what I was thinking. Oh, God, um, this is the last violations. You'd say whatever I went on Twitter. We'll start there. No, I think we go. I think strong family values bring back morals, bring back a good economy, good trade deals, secure borders. I think I love open carry more guns for people. Yeah, I do think that that, you know, a significant number. And I'm talking in the tens of millions of people deported, it would look something like victory. I'm like, if I win, what am I winning? What am I sitting on the top of a heap of rubble that I just that I created? Well, I don't want to be that sorry. All of those things will stem down from deportations, right? If you want to talk about having, you know, good gun laws in the country, I don't want to arm my enemy. And maybe that's unconstitutional and I get a lot of crap for that. But I don't want to give my enemy a gun. I don't want to get my gun. You'll shoot me with it. I've seen him. I suit, by the way. I mean, the the like, I got him saying if you deport people, you see now that, you know, prices for housing are going down in places across the country because there are fewer people competing for those resources. Everything in basically everything in the United States is a finite resource. There is there is scarcity. And so the more people that you have competing to buy things, the higher prices go. The more people you have competing to occupy space, the higher prices go. Part of the reason why health and health care is so expensive is because there are more people that are trying to get the health care from the hospitals. You wait longer in the emergency room. These there are people that need services that can't get it because there are more people here trying to traffic. For instance, there's another one. Yeah. All right, guys, let's head up a few more. These super chats before we get out of here. We've got a thespia saying as per Tim Cass tradition, I'm in the hospital welcoming baby three. That's being more conservative for the future of 51st state. It's got a lot of great. Amen. And congratulations. Congratulations. Well done. Continues. Get to work. Now you got to get number four in there. It's all very, you know, very exhausting. But a little bit of a little dude. We got a lot of work to do. Yeah. As soon as you can start walking or talking or something, like I said, I tell every baby this that's watching the show, get on Twitter, just start letting some tweets fly. Voice text. So yeah, voice text. Get some stats. Some kids two years of crime. So that's going. Was that kids two years apart is the best way to do it. God is good. What happens is he makes you forget about not sleeping for six. And they're walking around the same things like I love you. It's like, I should do that again. I should just it was all worth it. I was up at three thirty this morning. All right. The chat from Trevor saying, as per Tim Kress tradition, my second son Levi was just born this morning. This morning. I wish the future of the show and all the listeners again, man. Congratulations. It's absolutely well done. I shot same piece of advice. Just get grinding, dude. I don't know. You don't know the walk, honestly. I think you can sign up for Twitter with neural net. Yeah, you can. You can start his Twitter account now. You know, his name. You can tell what he means with each family. Make the make that like baby's first investment and start the Twitter account. You can start reading that Elon money. Yeah, you just put it directly into the college fund. You can reply to people like someone just throws up like a banger. So I think we need a I think we need a patriot fund to replace any given college fund and that just they just immediately learn to be giga chats and everything like that's Peter and you try to feed me carrots. Yeah, let's go. I would read that. That's great. Jay Hamblin says, should they release body cam footage each week under the reason of reason of transparency so the normies get a taste of what ice goes through on a daily basis, not just when they're being scrutinized. So I'll say this. I have heard I cannot confirm, but I've heard there might be an ice version of cops in production somewhere. So we might get that regular body cam footage. You know, some of the best of the best out there. I think that would be very entertaining. Yes, we get transparency, but more important, just like a bunch of meth heads in Florida, we get to laugh at them being arrested. And that's really what it's all about in the United States. Now we need like a like a sports center top 10, like a rest of the week. That would be sick. So like someone really pulls off like an insane tackle. You have like John Madden doing circles on it. Look at his form on your phone. There it goes. I want him diagramming ice arrest. Yeah, look, he takes him out at the knees. That's a beautiful double leg. He follows through. Look at that zip tie right around the arms. There's no break there. He doesn't hesitate. This guy knows how to execute. That's why he's been the MVP for ice for three months running. Yeah, like that's what I'm looking for. That's like heists all of things. I want the whole thing. That's like someone will make that account. They're going to the box and they're looking in there. They're like looking the wheels are moving. The wheels are moving. It's going to be close to call in the field is a clean shoot. So I think that's going to stand. But it looks like a tough one here. You see the wheels spin and she's been. How can we get that? Can someone work? Yeah, there's a guy that does that with with crime like taking out criminals. Do you? Yeah, but it's got to be like a like a high like money football. He thinks he's coming in hard. Oh, he laid him out. It's like UFC style. Would this be more Steve? The mom, right? Yeah, I lost 15 yards last few, you know, that's been struggling. Yeah, they lost a few in the off season. The officer got run over his toes. You know, we're hoping we get him back in that crucial position till then we're going to play clean ball, though. We're going to make sure, you know, like that's like grand bovinos out of Minnesota, coaching carousel. This one lost a finger tip. He's had to learn how to shoot left handed now. Yeah, that's it. Yeah, that he we got to move him to left tackle. He can't move right. So yeah, like, yeah, this is a training I say just for picks. All right, we've got a rough low 1804 here. He says, can we deport the actives judges that went to block at the end of the Haitian protected status to Haiti and keep the. I don't know how to pronounce that of a woman here. Pretty please. Yeah, I mean, obviously, actives judges can just head on out with the rest of them. I think that ultimately the Trump administration is probably going to come to that moment where they have to make a decision to break with the courts and that will be a very difficult moment. Obviously, they want to stay within those bounds as long as possible. They need a very egregious action by a judge to make any of that in any way justifiable. And that's something that they're going to have to choose probably at some point, but I think they're going to play it inside the lines as long as they can. Yep. All right, let's see what else we got here. We've got Wolf saying all the solutions are TOS violating violations and yet our supposed based patriots won't even risk those TOS violations, let alone actually enact said solution. Why exactly should we bother voting again? Yes, it is very smart to do things that get your YouTube channel taken off of YouTube. That's very smart. So funny thing about the last election, guess what? The border is closed. You have basically zero immigration happening right now. You have deportations that would never be happening under Kamala Harris. The J6ers are free. I hear some people in this room might care a little bit about the election. So I don't know. Like I hear you like I am an anti-democracy guy. I think democracy is stupid. I can't wait till it goes away. But while it is still are legitimating like, you know, the way that we ultimately decide who's going to be in charge of government, at least theoretically, then we do have to care about elections. It doesn't change everything. It's not a fix all solution, but it still matters. And it's a relatively low effort way to like use your political power. So at the very least, get out there and vote for the guy who's going to give you deportations, a closed border and freed political prisoners. Maybe he doesn't give you everything you want. Maybe he does some things you don't like. Maybe you go around saying those things and telling people why those are bad. But I just don't understand why you'd say no, those things just don't matter at all. I'd ask what it is you think he's not doing yet. I mean, we did just raid Fulton County. That's very exciting to me. True. And it's very exciting to me. The thing is, there are not people in shackles right now. That's really the thing. Like they look at the situation with J6 and they're like, well, they had a bunch of people in in in chains right away. Why hasn't Donald Trump done that? And while whereas I understand that frustration, if you just arrest people without having all of the evidence put together, especially if you're talking about Rico charges or something, some big stuff, if you just arrest people and you don't put, you know, they get found not guilty. You can't arrest them again. We have a law that says in the Constitution, it says you can't be tried for the same crime twice. So if they fail, if they arrest people and fail, they lose the opportunity. And I understand there are people like, oh, they're not going to do anything. Like I get it. But just like Orinus and this is like things are night and day better than they were under Joe Biden. Things would be incredibly terrible if we had Kamala Harris. It would be everything that Joe Biden did on 10. So I understand people being frustrated, but there have been victories and to Blackpill when we've had a lot of victories, kind of seems silly to me. Arresting these people is a lot more difficult than arresting a couple of, you know, just regular nine to five or two. I mean, it's going to take a lot more court pressure. It's going to take a lot better investigation. Like again, like when you when you arrest the 1600 people, most of them don't have the hundred thousand dollars to buy an attorney to help them fight charges. Yeah, they'll just take whatever plea deal they get while they're rotting in prison. That was the point that I made earlier that when you go after the small fish, do you get way more out of it by arresting the average Joe that isn't a wealthy guy that isn't politically connected. It's much harder to go after people that are politically connected. Not saying they don't deserve it. Not saying that I don't want to see it, but to Blackpill over it and say, they're not going to do anything. They've there. He's terrible. It's so bad when honestly, there have been significant advances for the right. I think that's the bad attitude to have. And I don't want the fodder either. Like I don't want the low hanging fruit either, right? Because they can just say, oh, we did. We did arrest people in connection to January 6th and connection to the election. I don't want that. That's not a win to me. I'd rather be patient and wait. Kyle Doris here says, Orin, I have a question for you. I go to church and I like Christian. I like Christians, but I'm not a man of faith. Why do you have faith? I feel too angry to believe. Well, let me tell you this, man, I'm very lucky. I grew up in the church. My parents were had us there every time the door was open. The faith is the faith of my father's. I've believed since I was young and I can't imagine anything else. The world has always been enchanted for me in a way that I know it isn't for a lot of people in modernity, and that's not something I did or I achieved. That's just a blessing that God gave me. That said, if you're wondering, how can you believe, you know, C.S. Lewis was a brilliant man who ran from God for a very long time. And it wasn't until J.R.O. Tolkien and several other very intelligent guys at Oxford came together and told him about how important was that he pursued a relationship with Christ that he believed in Christianity, that he ultimately found that it wasn't just the idea of some kind of, you know, academic problem that actually those solutions came very quickly. It was ultimately his resistance to faith, his wanting to fight against God that was keeping him apart. And I just think that if, you know, Tolkien and C.S. Lewis ultimately can believe in God, you can too. They're pretty smart guys. So it's both an intellectual journey and a philosophical journey, but most importantly, it is a journey of real faith. It sounds like you're in a church. It sounds like you want to learn and you want to believe those are the first steps, man. You know, you walk and then you run. You ask God for that faith. And eventually, I believe it will be delivered to you. You have to knock, but the door gets open. So I think you're doing a great job. Keep doing what you're doing. God will continue to chase you no matter where you are. Yeah. If you're looking for him, he will find you. He's been looking for you. I can tell you only through my stuff. I was a pastor for a couple of years and not a single church reached out to me and my family and our very difficult time. And you know, who didn't abandon me was God. Through all of my process, I had God, I had my faith and that was enough. So, you know, if you're if you're looking for him, he will find you. If you want, if you want to be found and you will never let you go. So keep looking. Yeah, man, I'm not a Christian. I don't adhere to Earth religions, but God seems to be real. I don't know what it is, but it's like the spiraling vortex at the center of every proton and galaxy and universe. Like it's this fractal, you know, resignation, reverberation, refraction, whatever. It's this repetitive cycle that's reversing entropy. As far as I can tell, I don't know. It seems to be real. I'm just a Presbyterian. We just call him Jesus sign. Yeah. It's Jesus sign. I grew up Southern Baptist. It's kind of the same thing. Delaware Husker here says, thanks, Ian. Language. Electric cars are not electric. The batteries are only a fuel tank. They are coal and gas powered cars. I mean, that depends on where you are. You have a Tesla. Is there anything you're talking about? You said electric cars are not electric. Most of the electricity in the United States is generated by coal or whatever. But there are places that have nuclear and and if you have like solar panels on your house and a battery in your house or actually just solar panels on your house and you plug your car in, then that'll be getting it directly from the sun. Most excited for when they can make graphene bodies that are solar panels and the car itself will charge fast enough to power it. That should be within the next 10 years. Should be. I don't know. I don't know. I've just made that up. I'm an optimist. 50 years. So who do we envy you in a dream? How about a different strategy? Graphene dot movie. Check it out. I love it. Source. I just made it up. Yeah. Handyman here says tax incentives in Hungary. Let's see. Tax incentive is what Hungary did to increase birth rates. Yeah. And there's mixed results on that. Some show that you see a bump, but it doesn't create long term benefits. I think that we should economically orient ourselves to having families and having children. We should stop treating Americans as the individual being the most important unit instead, recognize that families are what create the future of the country and we should make our investments there. That said, all the tax code fixes, all the financial fixes, they're great, but nothing replaces a people who sees a future for themselves, who understands themselves as a collective empty, working towards something they want to see themselves reflected in the future. That's what ultimately gets people to have children. Oswald Spangler said that once a civilization has to ask the question, should we have children? Civilizations basically over because once children stop being a natural rhythm, a natural outcome, the telos of your civilization, it starts to find reasons not to have them and ultimately dies off. So I agree with you that the tax incentives are a good move, but they're not a final way to fix this issue. They're ultimately something that is only stepping stone to understanding that you should be working to further your nation and your understanding of the future as a people who want to see their way of life continue. Yeah. And I mean, Hungary might have been an exception, because I mean, South Korea, Japan have been trying similar strategies and their birth rates are continuing to decline. Netherlands also did this. The Netherlands. So it's like, yeah, to Oron's point, I mean, it's a civilizational question and also like what exactly calls the birth rate to decline in the first place? Those are tougher conversations to have because they revolve around things like feminism and these sorts of things. Yeah. Right. So it's again, it's just you're kind of putting a bandit on a bull. Like I said, it's still worth it. I mean, it's still absolutely worth reorienting, again, government incentive structures for procreation. But at the end of the day, like these are going to be more philosophical questions that need to be answered. How do how should women sort of fit into society and these sorts of things? Convincing women that the ultimate form of woman is to emulate a man has been a disaster for Western society. Yeah, literally. Women are watching money night football now. Yeah. That is crazy. They're drinking beer. They've got high-waisted jeans. I know. We've gone too far. What's going on? Yeah. Dude, I saw a woman on NASCAR the other day. God, I know we're circling the drain. She was sitting in her Subaru. Wolf 374171 says Trump was too boomer to lock her up. Last time I doubt he'll do it. This time either wake me up when something happens. Well, we did see them arrest Don Lemon and several other people who entered a church. We are seeing that they're trying to crack down on this more. You're right. I think ultimately they should go after more high profile corrupt elites. But as we pointed out earlier, I just don't think Hillary Clinton is worth it at this point. Does she deserve it? Absolutely. But it's again a question of political capital, as I think many different gentlemen on this panel point out simultaneously backing somebody like Tim Walls. But I think send a far stronger message. Someone who's in the zeitgeist, who's obviously guilty of being involved. Very likely, allegedly in fraud and all of these things facilitating that behavior. I think that ultimately that's what we should be aiming for. I get the frustration, but the Trump administration is taking action. We encourage them to take more action just sitting there and go, nothing other happens. I think that's just a way to black pill. I think that's a way to try to be right all the time instead of invest in things that should actually be happening. Permabares are right once in a while, but they're just still just permabares. Right. You know, if you're constantly saying the sky is falling, then eventually, you know, when something bad happens, you can just be like, oh, see, I was right. I was right. And you never have to deal with the fact that you're wrong all the time until you're right. You know, guys, have you ever realized that you spent all your time learning how to take off in the plane, but you never discussed how to land it? Well, we're going to end up here. It's great to have everybody been fantastic. I am Orrin McIntyre hosting, of course, today as Tim is out. I've got my show, the Orrin McIntyre show on Blaze TV. It's on Rumble. It's on YouTube. It's on all your favorite podcast platforms. So if you enjoyed the show today, I really encourage you to check us out over at Blaze TV or on the podcast as well. Gentlemen, where should they look for you? You can get my book at unlicensedfurnersmembers.com and you can support my campaign at votesadamjohnson.com. Thanks for coming, man. People follow you on Twitter, too. Is it Lecter and Leader? It is Lecter and Leader on Twitter. Yes. I'm at Ian Crossland. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Instagram. Go to graphene.movie and check out this new documentary I'm working on. The trailer is up now. Sign up for the mailing list at graphene.movie. Follow me all over the internet at Ian Crossland and Tate Brown. Take it away. What is going on, guys? Oh, yeah. Thank you very much for watching, guys. Orrin, you did a fantastic job. Thank you, sir. Excellent, Don. You can follow me on X and Instagram at realtatebrown. And I will see you guys at noon Eastern on the Tim Cash Channel on Rumble for the noon live. I'll see you there. It's going to be a great time. I am Phil that remains on Twix. The band is all that remains. We're going on tour this spring. We're going out with Born of Osiris and Dead Eyes. You can check out the shows. We're starting in Albany on April 29th. We'll be out for about three and a half weeks or so. You can check us. You can get tickets at alltheramainsonline.com. You can check out the music at Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, Spotify, YouTube and Deezer. Don't forget the left lane is for crime. And I will definitely be going to Phil's tour here soon. It's going to be sick. And of course, guys, you should be following the channel here. Make sure you're subscribing. Do the needful for all of the Tim Cash crew. But if you want to stick around and follow us on Rumble, you'll be able to call in to the after show show live. So make sure you do that. Thanks for watching, everybody.