Letters from an American

American Adventurism in Iran

12 min
Mar 3, 2026about 2 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

This episode analyzes Trump's military strikes on Iran as ideologically driven adventurism rather than strategic policy, examining how Fox News personalities influenced the decision, the lack of clear objectives, and the humanitarian and constitutional consequences of unilateral military action without congressional approval or international law consideration.

Insights
  • Military decisions are being shaped by media personalities rather than strategic analysis, with Fox News hosts providing post-hoc justification rather than coherent policy rationale
  • The administration lacks a defined endgame for military operations, with shifting mission objectives from nuclear prevention to regime change, indicating reactive rather than planned strategy
  • Ideological commitment to displays of dominance has replaced post-WWII international frameworks as the organizing principle of foreign policy, undermining diplomatic institutions and legal conventions
  • Operational failures in evacuation planning and communication reveal institutional degradation from budget cuts and ideological prioritization over competent governance
  • Working-class Americans bear the human cost of elite-driven military adventurism while elites' children remain insulated from combat consequences
Trends
Media-driven foreign policy: Cable news personalities directly influencing military decision-making rather than strategic analysisErosion of post-WWII international order: Unilateral military action replacing multilateral diplomacy and treaty-based frameworksIdeological dominance over strategic objectives: Military operations justified by ideology of strength rather than defined policy goalsInstitutional degradation from budget cuts: State Department and diplomatic corps unable to execute basic functions like citizen evacuationShifting military mission creep: Initial objectives expanded and reframed mid-operation without strategic clarityRejection of international legal frameworks: Refusal to commit to Geneva Conventions and UN-based conflict resolutionClass-based military burden: Working-class recruitment for wars designed by and benefiting elitesIncomplete intelligence justification: Government assertions about military necessity contradicted by independent experts and lawmakers
Topics
Trump administration military policy on IranFox News influence on foreign policy decisionsConstitutional authority for military action without congressional approvalGeneva Conventions and international humanitarian lawUnited Nations Security Council and international institutionsU.S. military evacuation operations in Middle EastState Department budget cuts and diplomatic capacityPost-WWII international order and multilateralismNuclear proliferation concerns vs. regime change objectivesMedia influence on military decision-makingWorking-class military recruitment patternsIntelligence assessment and government credibilityAmerican foreign policy ideology and adventurismDefense Secretary confirmation and legal commitmentsU.S. unpaid UN dues and international relations
Companies
Fox News Channel
Primary media influence on Trump's Iran military decision; hosts Hannity, Levin, and Kilmeade urged bombing and shape...
The Economist
Middle East correspondent Greg Karlstrom analyzed Trump's lack of clear strategy and coherent goals for Iran military...
Media Matters
Matt Gertz documented how Trump shaped Iran attacks in response to encouragement from Fox News Channel hosts over mul...
Wall Street Journal
Journalists Dustin Volz, Alexander Ward, and Laura Seligman reported government assertions about Iran operations are ...
BBC
Contrasted with U.S. State Department for successfully arranging transport to evacuate British citizens from Gulf reg...
CNN
Broadcast interview with Retired Major General Randy Manor discussing shifting military mission objectives and lack o...
People
Donald Trump
President conducting military strikes on Iran without clear strategic objectives; influenced by Fox News personalitie...
Greg Karlstrom
Economist Middle East correspondent who analyzed Trump's lack of conviction and clear strategy regarding Iran militar...
Matt Gertz
Media Matters analyst documenting how Fox News hosts shaped Trump's decision to attack Iran over decades of advocacy
Sean Hannity
Fox News host who urged Trump to bomb Iran and praised military action as historic victory; influenced policy decisions
Mark Levin
Fox News personality who characterized Iran regime as death cult and urged Trump to attack; praised bombing as unprec...
Brian Kilmeade
Fox News host who argued U.S. would lose credibility without hitting Iran and urged Trump to attack for historical si...
Pete Hegseth
Defense Secretary and former Fox News host who refused to commit to Geneva Conventions; justified bombing as defensiv...
Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister whose pressure may have influenced Trump's decision to strike Iran militarily
Mohammed bin Salman
Saudi Crown Prince whose pressure may have influenced Trump's decision to strike Iran militarily
Melania Trump
First Lady sent to chair UN Security Council meeting; first presidential spouse to hold this position
Angus King
Independent Senator from Maine who pressed Defense Secretary Hegseth on commitment to Geneva Conventions during confi...
Dustin Volz
Wall Street Journal journalist reporting on incomplete and unsubstantiated government assertions about Iran military ...
Alexander Ward
Wall Street Journal journalist reporting on incomplete and unsubstantiated government assertions about Iran military ...
Laura Seligman
Wall Street Journal journalist reporting on incomplete and unsubstantiated government assertions about Iran military ...
Randy Manor
Retired Major General stranded in UAE who criticized shifting military mission objectives and lack of evacuation plan...
Ted Lieu
Democratic Representative from California criticizing State Department for ordering evacuation without arranging tran...
Jason Crow
Democratic Representative from Colorado and former Army Ranger highlighting class disparity in military service and w...
Marco Rubio
Secretary of State who ordered Americans to evacuate via commercial means despite closed airports and limited transpo...
Jimmy Carter
Former president whose Iran policy challenges Trump claims to be solving through military action
Heather Cox Richardson
Host and writer of Letters from an American podcast episode analyzing Trump's Iran military policy
Quotes
"Trump doesn't sound convinced by any of it. He's throwing spaghetti at the wall. Ultimately, I suspect he just wants to say he solved a problem that has vexed every American president since Jimmy Carter."
Greg Karlstrom (via Midas Touch summary)Opening analysis
"We don't start this war but under President Trump we are finishing it. It took the 47th president a fighter who always puts America first to finally draw the line after 47 years of Iranian belligerence."
Pete Hegseth, Defense SecretaryMid-episode
"It seems to me that the purpose and mission have been shifting over the past few days and the past few weeks. Initially it was to ensure that they could not continue to develop nuclear weapons. Now it's about regime change."
Retired Major General Randy ManorLate episode
"When elites like Donald Trump bang the war drums and pound their chests in Washington, D.C. and talk about sending troops into the ground or into combat, he's not talking about his kids. He's not talking about all of his minions' kids. He's talking about kids like me."
Representative Jason CrowClosing segment
"America is over the $3 trillion we've spent, the quagmires of failed nation building, the sending of our sons and daughters and brothers and sisters to enrich oil executives."
Representative Jason CrowClosing segment
Full Transcript
March 2nd, 2026. The Economist's Middle East correspondent Greg Karlstrom noted that Trump appears to be workshopping the causes for his attacks on Iran and his goals for the war by talking to journalists. As Midas Touch summarized Karlstrom's argument, he said, Trump doesn't sound convinced by any of it. He's throwing spaghetti at the wall. Ultimately, I suspect he just wants to say he solved a problem that has vexed every American president since Jimmy Carter. But there's no clear idea what that looks like and no plan for how to get there. And there are plenty of possible scenarios in which Trump declares victory and leaves the region with an absolute mess. Matt Gertz of Media Matters noted today that Trump, who watches the Fox News channel consistently, appears to have shaped his attack on Iran in response to encouragement from FNC hosts. Gertz recalled that for decades, the FNC hosts Trump trusts the most have called for military strikes on Iran. Last June, FNC personality Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and Brian Kilmeade urged Trump to bomb Iran and then lavished praise on him when he did. Hannity said the bombing would go down in history as one of the great military victories. In the past weeks, Gertz wrote, the same figures have been urging Trump to attack, but their goal appeared to be the bombing itself. They expected an easy victory without defining what that might look like. According to Kilmeade, the U.S. would lose credibility forever if it didn't hit Iran. On Friday morning, Kilmeade said, I hope the president chooses to go at it. We've been looking at these headlines for 47 years, and we have an opportunity to end it. And this president likes to make history. On Friday night, Levin told Hannity, this president knows right from wrong. He knows good from evil. He knows that this regime is a death cult. and he knows that there's only really two countries that are prepared and willing to put an end to this. We don't need to put up with their crap. It's time to put it to an end. On Saturday, after Trump had started the bombing, Levin said, Donald Trump did what nobody else could do for half a century. How do you like that? And you know why he did it? Because he loves his country. Trump's strikes on Iran could have had something to do with the increasing heat over the Epstein files or his fury that the Supreme Court struck down his tariff walls, which were central not only to his economic program but also to his pressure on foreign governments and companies to do his bidding Possibly he was responding to pressure from Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman or both Whatever their immediate trigger, the strikes fall in line with the ideology of cowboy individualism that began to take over the Republican Party in the 1980s, and which, under Trump, has turned into brutal displays of dominance. The old idea of a cowboy from rural America who cuts through the government bureaucracy that threatens his livelihood by coddling racial minorities and women has curdled into the notion that a leader can do whatever it takes, including violence, to force opponents to submit to his will. In foreign affairs, that means smashing the international alliances built after World War II. One of the crowning achievements of that international order is the United Nations, constructed to maintain international peace and security by creating organizations that could provide a forum for diplomacy and stop countries from attacking each other. The U.S. currently owes the U.N. nearly $4 billion in unpaid dues as Trump seeks to replace the organization with his own Board of Peace that he alone controls. This month, the U.S. holds the presidency of the U.N. Security Council, enabling it to set the agenda. Today, Trump sent First Lady Melania Trump to chair the meeting, the first time a presidential spouse has done so. Another of the crowning achievements of the post-World War II international order is the Geneva Conventions, which define the legal treatment of noncombatants in war. In his confirmation hearings, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth refused to tell Senator Angus King, an independent of Maine, who pressed him on the issue, that he would uphold the Geneva Conventions. In the ideology that honors violent domination, Trump's bombing Iran without regard for the constitution or international law, when no president before him had done so, proves his strength. Hegseth illustrated that idea this morning when he said, For 47 long years, the expansionist and Islamist regime in Tehran has waged a savage, one-sided war against America. Hegseth, who was a Fox News Channel weekend host before becoming Secretary of Defense, tried to turn the administration's military operation into a heroic stand in a silent war that had lasted for two generations. Claiming the U.S. attacks on Iran that started this conflagration were defensive rather than offensive, Hegseth claimed, We didn start this war but under President Trump we are finishing it It took the 47th president a fighter who always puts America first to finally draw the line after 47 years of Iranian belligerence He reminded the world as he has time and time again, if you kill Americans, if you threaten Americans anywhere on earth, we will hunt you down without apology and without hesitation, and we will kill you. Hegseth celebrated Israel and its strikes alongside the U.S., while he condemned so many of our traditional allies who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, hemming and hawing about the use of force. America, regardless of what so-called international institutions say, is unleashing the most lethal and precise air power campaign in history. No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically correct wars. We fight to win and we don't waste time or lives. In this ideology, the dominance itself is the point. There is no other endgame. But this ideology was always based on a myth that played well on television. Three days into the attack on Iran, there is increasing scrutiny of the assertions from government officials. According to Dustin Volz, Alexander Ward, and Laura Seligman of the Wall Street Journal, lawmakers and experts say those assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong. And as the conflagration spreads, taking the lives of now six of our military personnel, the administration is now discovering that the American people would like to know why we are engaged in what appears to be a war of choice and why this approach to the world is better than the one that kept us safe for 80 years. Today, the State Department told U.S. citizens to leave Gulf states immediately because of serious safety risks, using available commercial transportation. But many of the airports in the region are closed, some because they have been hit in the fighting. Representative Ted Lieu, a Democrat of California, posted on social media, Dear Secretary of State Marco Rubio, you told Americans to depart now via commercial means when you know many airports, airspace are closed. You must immediately schedule U.S. government evacuation flights for the stranded Americans in danger. Maybe you should have thought of a fricking plan first. Retired Major General Randy Manor, who is currently stranded in the United Arab Emirates, told CNN, It seems to me that the purpose and mission have been shifting over the past few days and the past few weeks Initially it was to ensure that they could not continue to develop nuclear weapons Now it's about regime change, and then there's so many things that are being piled onto the mission list, it almost seems like someone Googled it before the brief to throw everything in the kitchen sink into it. So it's a little bit disconcerting. And in fact, one of the small things that does matter to tens of thousands of people here, as well as to their families, it's a little bit disheartening and a little bit envious to hear that the BBC has announced that the UK government is actually arranging transport for the British citizens to be able to extract them. Whereas here, for us Americans, we feel abandoned. The state departments have talked to two embassy personnel, two different embassies. They're in survival mode, quite frankly, because as we know, the administration reduced their budgets by almost one half over the past year. So this is a difficult situation for people who are not used to being in a combat situation. And that, of course, is, quite frankly, probably 99% of the travelers that are here. Former paratrooper and Army Ranger Representative Jason Crow, a Democrat of Colorado, also had something to say about the reality of war. I learned years ago that when elites like Donald Trump bang the war drums and pound their chests in Washington, D.C. and talk about sending troops into the ground or into combat, he's not talking about his kids. He's not talking about all of his minions' kids. He's talking about kids like me and the people that I grew up with in working-class areas, rural places around the country that have to pick up rifles, jump in the tanks or helicopters, and do the tough work. Well, America is over it. America is over the $3 trillion we've spent, the quagmires of failed nation building, the sending of our sons and daughters and brothers and sisters to enrich oil executives. America is over endless adventurism using our military, because they want their infrastructure rebuilt. They want affordable healthcare. They want to be able to afford groceries. They want to be able to afford a home. They want to be able to send their kids to school. Letters from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. It was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, Massachusetts. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.