Pod Save America

1116: Epstein Files: Worse Than You Thought

109 min
Feb 3, 20263 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

Pod Save America discusses the release of 3 million pages of Jeffrey Epstein files revealing extensive connections to powerful figures including Trump, Elon Musk, and others. The hosts also cover Trump's corruption scandals including a $500 million UAE deal and his lawsuit against the IRS, plus immigration enforcement issues and a Democratic special election victory in Texas.

Insights
  • The Epstein files reveal a global network of elite corruption that extends far beyond individual bad actors to systemic institutional failures
  • Trump's corruption operates at unprecedented levels, combining personal enrichment with abuse of presidential powers in ways that challenge traditional accountability mechanisms
  • Immigration enforcement under Trump is creating economic disruption in border communities while failing to deliver on campaign promises of targeted deportation
  • Democratic electoral opportunities may be emerging in traditionally red districts due to backlash against Trump policies and economic concerns
  • The breakdown of traditional media gatekeeping makes it increasingly difficult to distinguish credible information from misinformation in major scandals
Trends
Weaponization of federal law enforcement against journalists and political opponentsIncreasing corporate capture of government agencies through revolving door appointmentsEconomic disruption from mass deportation policies affecting construction and service industriesGrowing backlash against immigration enforcement in Latino communities that previously supported TrumpBreakdown of traditional congressional oversight mechanisms due to partisan polarizationRise of non-traditional political candidates from entertainment and other industriesIncreasing difficulty in verifying information due to social media manipulation and document dumpsGrowing wealth inequality enabling elite corruption networks to operate with impunity
Companies
World Liberty Financial
Trump family crypto venture that received $500 million investment from UAE royal
Palantir
Company mentioned in Epstein files and receiving immigration enforcement contracts
Nvidia
Manufacturer of advanced AI chips sold to UAE in controversial Trump administration deal
Binance
Crypto company that received $2 billion UAE investment using Trump family stablecoin
SimpliSafe
Home security company sponsoring the podcast episode
Rocket Money
Subscription management app sponsoring the podcast episode
Amazon
Company that fired 16,000 people while Jeff Bezos spent on Melania documentary
Deloitte
Consulting firm receiving contracts related to ICE immigration enforcement
People
Donald Trump
Former and current president central to corruption scandals and Epstein connections
Jeffrey Epstein
Deceased financier whose released files reveal extensive elite corruption network
Elon Musk
Tesla CEO mentioned extensively in Epstein files with social relationship
Pam Bondi
Attorney General ordering arrest of journalist Don Lemon on questionable charges
Tulsi Gabbard
Intelligence director facilitating Trump call with FBI agents and facing whistleblower complaint
Don Lemon
Independent journalist arrested by DOJ for covering anti-ICE protest
Bobby Polito
Grammy-nominated musician running for Congress in Texas 15th district
Stephen Miller
Trump advisor driving aggressive immigration enforcement policies
Bill Gates
Microsoft founder mentioned in Epstein files with social connections
Steve Bannon
Former Trump advisor described as close friends with Epstein in released files
Cash Patel
FBI nominee who testified there was no evidence of Epstein trafficking to others
Taylor Remitt
Democratic candidate who won Texas special election in Trump +17 district
Quotes
"The problem is that it's turning out to be the Democrats that were with and conspired with Epstein. They were working together to try and help me lose the election."
Donald TrumpN/A
"I like the web of connections that this man actually has. The clear evidence of trafficking that's in these files is stunning. It's like, like QAnon was right. They just looked the wrong direction."
Tommy VietorN/A
"I'm supposed to work out a settlement with myself. I think what we'll do is do something for charity."
Donald TrumpN/A
"They will get taken care of in at least an equal way. You know, you see it the way they treat our people. And I said, you're allowed. If somebody does that, you can do something back."
Donald TrumpN/A
Full Transcript
4 Speakers
Speaker A

Today's presenting sponsor is Simplisafe Home Security. As a POD Save America listener, you know as well as us the dark chapter we're stepping into. Oh, we're there. We're in it. It's been a long chapter.

0:00

Speaker B

Yeah, we're in the chapter.

0:08

Speaker A

Yeah. But no matter what's happening outside your four walls, your home should always provide a safe sanctuary for your family. Simplisafe can help provide peace of mind with proactive protection that helps to stop threats before they even have the chance to break in. What do you love most about having SimpliSafe?

0:09

Speaker B

SimpliSafe is very easy to set up and the app really reliable. The customer support really great. It gives you peace of mind.

0:25

Speaker A

There you go. Traditional security systems only take action after someone has already broken in that's too late. Simplisafe's Active Guard Outdoor protection can help prevent break ins before they happen. AI powered cameras backed by live professional monitoring agents monitor your property and detect suspicious activity. If someone's lurking around or acting suspiciously, those agents see and talk to them in real time, activate spotlights and even contact the police. All before they have the chance to get inside your home. No long term contracts or cancellation fees. Monitoring plans start a four at around a dollar a day. 60 day satisfaction guarantee or your money back. Name best home security systems by U.S. news World Report. Five years in a row ranked number one in customer service among home security providers by both Newsweek and USA Today. And right now our listeners can get 50% off their new SimpliSafe system with professional monitoring and their first month free at simplisafe.com crooked that's simplisafe.com crooked. There's no safe like SimpliSafe.

0:31

Speaker C

Five years ago I was paying 65 dollars a month for my subscriptions. Today those Same subscriptions cost $111 and I don't even use half of them anymore. That's why now I use Rocket Money to manage my subscriptions for me. The app gives you a list of all of your subscriptions and reminds you of upcoming payments so you're not hit with any surprise charges. On top of that, it also sends you alerts when subscription prices go up, so you always know the price you're paying. If you decide you no longer want a subscription, you can cancel it right from the app. No customer service. And the best part is Rocket Money even reaches out and tries to get.

1:24

Speaker D

You refunded for some of the money you lost.

1:59

Speaker C

On average, people that cancel their subscriptions with rocket money save $378 a year. And overall, Rocket Money has saved its members $880 million in canceled subscriptions.

2:01

Speaker D

Stop wasting money on things you don't use.

2:14

Speaker C

Go to rocketmoney.com cancel to get started, that's rocketmoney.com cancel rocketmoney.com cancel.

2:16

Speaker A

Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau.

2:45

Speaker B

I'm Jon Lovett.

2:47

Speaker A

Tommy Guetor on today's show, millions of Epstein files have finally been released. So we're going to talk about why the revelations are just as bad, if not worse than you thought. We also have some stunning new corrupt dates to talk about the status of Trump's so called de escalation in Minnesota, his arrest of Don Lemon and other journalists slash protesters. And some good news, a surprise Democratic special election win in a deep red part of Texas. And then Tommy talks to musician Bobby Polito about why he decided to jump into politics and run for Congress in Texas. Just a ton of news to talk about, as there always is, which is one reason you should consider becoming a subscriber.

2:47

Speaker C

Good call.

3:23

Speaker A

Every week on our subscriber only pods and our growing number of substack newsletters, we're going deeper on all the biggest stories and cover the big stories we didn't get a chance to cover here on Pod Save America. We just added a new bi weekly subscriber only episode of Pod Save America called Pod Save America. Only Friends, perfect name. We have a.

3:24

Speaker C

It's for buys weekly.

3:44

Speaker A

It's for buys weekly. Yeah.

3:45

Speaker B

Only Friends buys weekly, bi weekly, Only Friends.

3:47

Speaker A

And if you don't, and if you don't like listening to things, if you still like reading things, we also have a new weekly Pod Save America newsletter called Open Tabs. You also as a subscriber would get free ad free episodes of all your favorite crooked pods, plus bonus content like Pod Save the World Q and A with Tommy and Ben.

3:51

Speaker C

Wow, we're still doing that. I'm just kidding. It's actually very fun to do.

4:07

Speaker A

Haven't listened.

4:10

Speaker C

We get super intense questions. I don't think I know how to listen to the Q and A. But mostly just please subscribe because it's the most helpful thing you'd possibly do for us as a company trying to grow here in the independent, progressive media world.

4:11

Speaker A

So yeah, if you, if you like supporting independent pro democracy media, this is a subscription for you. If you don't, we won't, you know, then go somewhere else.

4:21

Speaker B

But we'll keep listening for free.

4:29

Speaker A

But it would mean a lot to all of us here, Crooked, if you considered subscribing@crooked.com friends all right, let's start with the Justice Department's congressionally mandated, though very delayed, release of another 3 million pages of Epstein related documents with which were dumped online Friday afternoon in a fairly haphazard manner. So much so that the documents accidentally included dozens of nude photos of victims and in some cases, full names and other information that could be used to identify them. The biggest takeaway, though, was that a bunch of very rich, famous and powerful people were close to Epstein. You may even call it a cabal, and seemed to know both who they were dealing with and in some cases, what he was up to. People like Elon Musk, Richard Branson, Peter Thiel, Sergey Brin, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and of course, Donald Trump, whose name appears more than 5,000 times in different contexts. Here's what Trump had to say for himself on Monday in the Oval.

4:31

Speaker D

The problem is that it's turning out to be the Democrats that were with and conspired with Epstein. They were working together to try and help me lose the election. And frankly, the doj, I think, should just say we have other things to do because that whole thing has turned out, I mean, other than Bill Clinton and, you know, Bill Gates and lots of people that have. There are a lot of questions about it, but nothing on me. When Epstein was alive like 10 years ago, nobody cared about it.

5:24

Speaker A

Yeah. Who?

5:54

Speaker C

Busy.

5:55

Speaker D

Too busy.

5:55

Speaker A

Who ever cared about Epstein before Trump was president anyway? Let's listen.

5:56

Speaker D

On day one, roll out the black book.

6:00

Speaker B

And not just that. On day one, roll out all of.

6:03

Speaker C

The text messaging communications we were told were deleted.

6:05

Speaker A

We need to release the f scene list. That, that is an important thing. Just a couple of libs there.

6:08

Speaker C

Yeah, classic.

6:13

Speaker A

Obviously 3 million pages, a lot to get through, but I know you guys have both gotten through about 95, 97% of them. What jumped out at you in the, in the files? Tommy, you want to go first?

6:14

Speaker B

Sure.

6:25

Speaker C

I mean, look, I just want to start by saying I'm completely red pilled on this stuff. I like, I thought Jeffrey Epstein was a scummy guy who did bad things and then used connections to avoid accountability. I like the web of connections that this man actually has. The clear evidence of trafficking that's in these files is stunning. It's like, like QAnon was right. They just looked the wrong direction. You know what I mean? It's like it's mind boggling. So Cash Patel, there's another clip for him when he was saying he testifies before Congress that there's no evidence that Epstein trafficked other women to other individuals. Like, he should be held in contempt just for that. Things that jumped out at me. Steve Bannon is all over the Epstein files. They are really good friends. Bannon is helping him rehab his image. They're working on projects together. Like, it's. He's helping him. Epstein's helping Bannon fund his stuff.

6:26

Speaker D

That.

7:15

Speaker C

That's a lot more we should learn there. You mentioned the Trump piece. I mean, It's. He's in 5300 files, there's 38,000 references to Trump. Some of those are duplicative, but, like, he's everywhere. And in this clip, it's like, we've finally gotten the files and now Trump is saying, like, ah, who even cares about this guy? It's been a long time. He's ready to move on. And there's one email where Epstein specifically talks about whether to call Trump about Virginia Giuffre.

7:16

Speaker A

Yeah, that was one.

7:39

Speaker C

An Epstein victim who wrote a book about her experience who died by suicide recently. We need to learn more about that. Elon Musk is a scumbag. He has a social relationship with Epstein. He clearly knows what's going on. He says, like, I want to go to your island for the wildest party. Now, we don't know if he ever went there, but he is all over these files. There's multiple NFL owners in these things. Steve Tisch, Steve Tiff, Giants owner, worst defender. I don't know how he survives this. Jeffrey Epstein got permanently banned from Xbox Live. Did you guys catch this one?

7:41

Speaker B

Yeah, I've heard about that. Again, it's one of those things where in our kind of postmodern, post truth world, is that unbelievable and true or unbelievable and false?

8:10

Speaker C

It's true. I think a lot of people thought it was because he was talking shit to teenagers on Fortnite. And it might be a new thing we learned about him. I think it's because he's registered as a sex offender. I also, I was also just stunned by how truly global the scandal is. Like, the crown princess of Norway was buddies with Epstein in the UK. They got Peter Mendelssohn, who recently was the UK's ambassador to the US, gave Jeffrey Epstein a heads up on the government's response to the EU debt crisis before it happened.

8:19

Speaker A

I guess he resigned.

8:48

Speaker C

Market sensitive information. He resigned. Ehud Brock is all over these files. There's audio of Jeffrey Epstein telling Ehud Barak about Palantir for the first time.

8:49

Speaker A

So it's Just Slovakia's prime ministers security advisor just resigned as well.

8:56

Speaker C

Great, another one.

9:02

Speaker A

So like you could do a whole episode of Pilot, Save the World on this.

9:03

Speaker C

And we're, Ben and I are going to do this tomorrow. But like the, the just scope of it is amazing. Just last thing. Like, like you said, love it. Like, it's just the fake news problem is so exacerbated in a situation like this because you have 3 million files dumped onto the Internet. There's stuff all over Twitter. You have no idea what's real and what is fake. It's so easy to slip something fake into, you know, the kind of social media ecosystem right now. It's just really terrible.

9:06

Speaker B

Yeah. So there's all the kind of like, who's in it? What, what does it mean? And, and, and we don't know. Right. There's a reason, traditionally you don't just release millions and millions of files that were kind of part of different aspects of an investigation without context and without context. And, and by the way, like, you know, everyone was clamoring for why, you know, for DOJ to release these documents and why they had missed the deadline. And I actually see why that took them this long and probably should have honestly taken them longer because there's tons of mistakes throughout this. If you just do a keyword search, you will find an email where the names are redacted every place except one. But if you missed one, well, didn't matter that you redacted the other ones. There's all kinds of other names of people unrelated to this that are inside of here with personal information.

9:29

Speaker A

The other challenge is, by the way, in the names. And this is like, you know, why Trump's name is in there so many times it appears that someone sent Jeffrey Epstein like news clips regularly.

10:12

Speaker B

Yeah.

10:21

Speaker A

So there are so many names in the FC files that are just part of the news clips that he received, which is tough.

10:21

Speaker B

But then like, you do see this and it's too many people for cabal, John. I think it's fully fledged a ring, this ring of elites. And it's why, like, why around this man, what was the pull that this man had? And I do genuinely believe, like a lot of the men connected through this were not necessarily directly involved in sex crimes, though he was a registered sex offender who had a terrible and well known reputation. So these people are all despicable for getting this close to him. But, but he had these connections. He could get things done. He could get you to a country club, he could connect people from here and where did that power came from. And that power came from for some subset of these people. He was a vehicle for access to women, girls, and to a kind of, like, licentiousness that was appealing to them, for them to step out of their lives. In 2010, Peggy Segal, who is a publicist, was helping Epstein regain entry into society. And she was telling him, I. I have no idea what the reaction will be to your reentry into society, but take it slow and stay quiet. Your friends are there for you, and at least the house is drop dead gorgeous. Every fag decorator with an immediate interest in Israel Charming will be begging for a look. This was about him bringing together military people and intellectuals and scientists to have these dinners. And he did it. And you know what? It fucking worked. So Peter Attia, who is a doctor that was recently, like, a longevity guy.

10:28

Speaker A

Who was recently brought extremely popular book.

11:50

Speaker B

Extremely popular book, actually. Like, you know, I didn' know that he was in the fucking Epstein files. Like, I've seen clips from him and I was like, oh, that's interesting. How real is this guy? And then I saw an interview where he was like, proudly referring to the second derivative as if it was a scientific term. And I was like, I'm skeptical. I'm skeptical. You're trying to seem smart in a way that I'm not trusting. He had to put out a statement today explaining how he was in these emails with Epstein even after he was a registered sex offender. And he said everything about him seemed excessive and exclusive, including the fact that he lived in the largest home in all of Manhattan, owned a Boeing 727, and hosted parties with the most powerful and prominent leaders in business and politics. In retrospect, the presence and credibility ability of such venerable people in different orbits led me to make assumptions about him that clouded my judgment in ways it shouldn't have.

11:52

Speaker A

I thought. The other thing interesting about that statement too, is he basically says, like, so obviously I knew that he had had a. A prostitution charge, right? But because it was like he served a year and it was like, you know, maybe it was a prostitution charge and he didn't know the age of the girl and he was soliciting process, you know, and then it's what you just said, which is that knowledge combined with, well, he's famous and rich and has all these connections, and everyone else who's rich and powerful likes him, so he can't be that bad. It really, like, shines a light on just how fucking, like, corrupt and broken and gross the system is. That, like, the entire culture around him can make someone think, like, I'm not gonna do my due diligence on this guy because, you know, it must have just been a little mishap.

12:34

Speaker B

Yeah. If people from the fucking Aspen. If people I met at the Aspen Ideas Festival would jump off a bridge, why wouldn't I?

13:22

Speaker A

Exactly.

13:28

Speaker B

And, and so, like, he kind of is able to get his reputation back. And by the way, it was a, it was a strategy to only have that be what was publicly known about the charges. And now in these, in this release, you find that Acosta, when he was the prosecutor, had a whole bevy of other potential charges involving crimes and abuse and rape of girls.

13:29

Speaker A

Yeah. The draft indictment that's in here of the 30 of 32 counts from the Southern District of Florida, that also includes three co conspirators. The draft, that was never, you know, because he got the sweetheart deal from Costa, so it never went forward. But that, to me, is a very fascinating document.

13:48

Speaker C

That deal remains kind of like the original sin of the second act of Jeffrey Epstein. If that deal is just. Is about reality, about what he really did, the scope of it, I mean, I think there's no way this guy gets back into the world. But I do think he did exactly what you said, which would be like, look, yes, I solicited a prostitute. One of them was 17 or something like that. And these guys were like, just bought it.

14:03

Speaker A

Yep.

14:23

Speaker B

I also just a lot of how we've been looking at the scandal has been around who's involved with it. Right. And like, what, what, what, what did these big name people do and what didn't they do? I think that's important and I think we still don't have all the answers and we should be fighting to get more answers. But when you dig into it, you also just find these little, like, artifacts of how he was actually manipulating his situation, including the girls and women that were involved. And you can't. Again, there are these little kind of, I don't know, snippets, these sort of disintegrated, like, disentangled little bits of information you can't fully understand. But you see these sort of vicious back and forths with people whose names you don't know where. He's saying things like, you had an apartment, you had money, you had an agreement, many agreement promises, you broke them all. You were acting like a spoiled child who thinks the world owes them a living. Sleeping all day, not helping, not dancing. There are these little bits of the evil at the very core of it. And you see the emails he wrote to himself, little ideas, little things that came to him. And at the core of this whole enterprise was this disgusting man, this like vicious monster that had built all these like kind of layers around him to seem respectable. And like the, the fact that even now we still don't really totally understand a lot of what actually happened because it's now being released in this haphazard and confusing way where you don't know what's real and you don't know what's not. We are gonna like I still think there's there that whether it's the Democrats in Congress, whether it's a Democratic presidential candidate calling for some kind of hearing and investigation, like we need to have like public hearings about this, about how this like to just to get the truth about it, including getting the participants in it force them to speak in front of the country about what happened. Because I still think we're gonna live in this sort of like semi true kind of understanding because of the way.

14:23

Speaker A

They release these documents to that point. The Epstein law that passed says that the DOJ needs to turn over their internal memos, deliberations, notes on who they charged. Why, why didn't they make certain charging decisions? They have not done that yet. So they are just in violation of the law still by not doing that. And usually the Department of Justice would never turn over those notes, but that's what the law that Donald Trump signed into law and Congress just passed said. So I do think that can shine a light on some of this because also to your point about Cash Patel, like, I can't tell clearly it was dishonest what he said in front of Congress. But I don't know if you've seen anything in any of the emails I haven't that show that like clearly there were other men who trafficked underage women with Jeffrey Epstein. Like, I don't think any of the.

16:20

Speaker C

Emails Cash Patel says there is no evidence. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he Epstein trafficked to other individuals. It seems like the Steve Tisch case seems like that's exactly what happened there. Now maybe they were of age, but did we investigate that?

17:07

Speaker A

Right. I don't know.

17:19

Speaker C

It seems like there's a lot of smoke here, but we'll find out. I mean it's clear like the FBI like fell down on the job here. They just didn't do what they should do.

17:20

Speaker A

Well, it's good. It seems like there's three levels of Epstein connections here that you see in these emails. The first level is New Epstein was friendly with him and was just in the social circles and thought he was a great guy, you know. Then there was New Epstein friendly with him and was discussing, like, girls with him in like, they were fucking objects in the. In the most grossest sort of man. And then there were like the Tish stuff, which is like, yes, I have girls for you, basically, which is like helping him find. Yeah. And there were. Yeah. And. And Trump in here, by the way, is through some uncorroborated allegations, but like including some witness interviews with the FBI and other things is like somewhere in between the discussing girls in a. In a gross lewd manner and potentially like, around him when there were girls being, you know, Trump is saved because.

17:26

Speaker C

He does not use email.

18:14

Speaker A

Yes.

18:15

Speaker C

Like, if we had audio of Donald Trump's conversation with the Jeffrey Epstein, I bet Jaws would be on the floor and we wouldn't believe it. The other sort of process thing. Love it. I'm glad you brought this up. That I'm seeing a lot out there is like, Joe Biden could have released all of this. Why didn't he? You fell down on the job. It's like, actually, no, this is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to work. And I think we're seeing that play out. Like, it's awful. Like, I hope there's accountability for the abused. I hope that people who did bad things go to jail. But like, Jesus Christ, like, releasing all these victims names, the images, the, like the random people. Like, this is. This is actually not good. And like, no, you don't want Joe Biden to be digging through DOJ files to try to destroy his political opponents. Guys like, this is. There should be a bigger principle here.

18:16

Speaker B

Yeah. I asked like, the process of the redacting and not redacting. Are they being. Are they just haphazard and like, injudicious? Are they being kind of making choices with what names are showing or not showing at times? I have no idea. Also doing this in these giant, rare, rare, huge dumps of information when inside of it, you know, is personal and like information about victims of crime. So some of this is just the incompetence in the way it's being executed. But I do, I actually. One thing I would just when I was looking through it, I really struck like I was over the weekend, just the kind of the wash of comments about it, the way we were learning about it, random people posting things, you didn't know what it was. True. And like, all of it kind of. Some of it sort of silly. And then all of it relating to monstrous crimes.

19:00

Speaker A

Some of it was fake on Twitter, a lot of it was fake.

19:47

Speaker B

I really the sort of terror it was, it really gave us like a sick feeling just about where we're at and how like the. The, because we're doj, you can't rely on them. You can't trust them.

19:49

Speaker C

The.

20:00

Speaker B

The. The social media has been kind of taken over by Elon and others in a way that makes it impossible to know what's true or not true. And, and this all feeds like even the fact that we're in this mess is like, of like getting the information this way is a product of our kind of conspiratorial mindset. And yet I'm glad for the most like I do think that this was necessary. I think like what that, that Kana and Massey were able to get this through was like ultimately the right thing to do given what we're learning. Like we would never know any of this. And I'm glad that we do for.

20:01

Speaker C

The most part good for them that they, that they wrote this law and did it the right way and got every member of Congress but one to vote for it. I just like the people are saying like Joe Biden should have unilaterally taken this step through his doj. It's like it's a lot of collateral damage there. I think we don't think True.

20:30

Speaker A

Yeah, for sure.

20:45

Speaker B

Pod Save America is brought to you by Smalls. Your cat has zero interest in politics, but they absolutely have strong opinions about their food, which is why you need to give them smalls. It's 2026. Do you still feed your cat like it's 1926 for a limited time? Get 60% off your first order plus free shipping when you head to smalls.com Crooked Smalls Cat Food is protein packed recipes made with preservative free ingredients you'd find in your fridge and it's delivered right to your door. That's why cats.com named Smalls their best overall cat food. Starting with Smalls is easy. Just share info about your cat's diet, health and food preferences. Then Smalls puts together a personalized sampler for your cat. No more picking between random brands at the store. Smalls has the right food to satisfy any cat's craving. Still not a believer in Smalls? Forbes ranked Smalls the best overall cat food, while Buzzfeed said, my cats went absolutely ballistic for this stuff. After switching to smalls, 88% of cat owners reported overall health improvements. That's a big deal and the team at Smalls is so confident your cat will love the product, you can try it risk free. That means they will refund you if your cat won't eat their food. Picky cats don't even worry about it. Make 2026 your cat's healthiest year yet. Take advantage of their New Year's special and get 60% off your first order plus free shipping when you head to Smalls.comSmiles Crooked one last time. That's 60% off your first order plus free shipping when you go to Smalls.com Crooked.

20:55

Speaker A

Pod Save America is brought to you by ZipRecruiter listeners. Think back to a first date where you were really interested in someone. You probably asked them important questions like what are you looking for? Or what are your deal breakers?

22:08

Speaker B

When do you graduate?

22:20

Speaker A

So you could get a better idea of whether or not this is the right person for you. Well, the same goes if you're hiring. You definitely want to address key questions first to see if someone could be right for your role. That's why you need ZipRecruiter when you post your job, ZipRecruiter suggests screening questions to help you hone in on top candidates faster, and today you can try it for free@ziprecruiter.com Crooked ZipRecruiter's matching technology immediately finds qualified candidates that check all your boxes. ZipRecruiter recommends screening questions you can easily add to get the highest quality applicants. Want to see who's recently active? ZipRecruiter's filters can show you no wonder ZipRecruiter is the number one rated hiring site based on G2. Ask key questions and hire faster with ZipRecruiter, four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. Try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com crooked that's ZipRecruiter.com crooked meet your match on ZipRecruiter in case the Epstein revelations didn't make you mad enough, we also got more news over the weekend about Trump's mind blowing, absolutely shameless corruption. The Wall Street Journal reported that just days before Trump was inaugurated, an Abu Dhabi royal known as the Spy Sheikh, who's the United Arab Emirates national security adviser and runs the country's sovereign wealth fund, bought a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial, the Trump family's crypto venture, for $500 million with an upfront payment of $187 million. Going right to quote Trump family entities. In a complete coincidence, the Trump administration then gave the spy sheik what the UAE had long wanted but hadn't been able to get access to when Biden was president. Half a million of America's most advanced AI chips. I guess the Emiratis just really believed in Eric Trump's business plan and his crypto expertise, huh? Is that what we think?

22:25

Speaker C

Yeah, for a company that was, I don't think they had a product at the time and the 49% stake that they purchased actually didn't get you access to the future revenue on the only thing they were selling at that moment. So, yeah, no, it definitely that's what happened. First of all, I just want to say shout out to the Wall Street Journal for getting this scoop, like, thank God liberal billionaire Rupert Murdoch is using his power for good. Right. While all these other, you know, right wing assholes like Jeff Bezos just turtle and buy Melania documentaries.

24:07

Speaker A

I mean, so by the way, before.

24:34

Speaker C

This story, what we knew about this UAE AI chips deal was that an Emirati backed investment fund called MGX, the last, last spring made a $2 billion investment into a crypto company called Binance. And they did it using the Trump family's stablecoin. Their new cryptocurrency, USD1, which is from World Liberty Financial, the same company. So that came out of nowhere. It instantly made USD 1 one of the most highly circulated stablecoins in existence and then reportedly makes the Trump family $80 million a year in passive income. Then right after that, the Trump agrees to provide the UAE with these chips. So we already knew that there was like a totally corrupt drug deal, but this report is even crazier. Like they just bought this company outright. There was no disclosure. $187 million goes to the Trump family. Another tranche of the money goes to Steve Witkoff's son, who remember, like as this is all happening, Steve Wycoff is named the kind of like emissary for everything. He's going around the world. He goes to a crypto conference in the UAE and then two weeks later, the contracts to make this purchase just magically appear. And so it just, this confirms what we know, which is that Trump and Steve Wyckoff, they're running around the globe, they're talking to autocrats and they are steering money into their family's pot. And like Jared Kushner has gotten a bunch of money from the Emiratis. We also know the Emiratis were pushing Trump to pardon the Binance CEO, this guy CZ, that obviously will help your $2 billion investment if you know that company gets right with regulators in the U.S. so it's like, what do you fucking do with this? This is you move the President is what you do. It's corruption like nothing we've ever seen in this country. And it's like a one day story.

24:35

Speaker A

Well, and it is a great example of why impeachment is the only remedy because John Roberts and his court would say that the lifting. Yeah, giving them the chips was official business, which it was. Right. But obviously we know that there is a personal stake there. And so what Roberts and the court would say in that opinion is, well, impeachment is the remedy. If you think it was, if it was a conflict and the Republicans are just like, no, no, no, it's totally fine for your family to take half a, half a billion dollars and then to like literally sell America out by. And, and one of the reasons, by the way, they didn't want to give the UAE these like very advanced AI chips, aside from the fact that it's a foreign government. But, but weren't they concerned, wasn't there a concern that they were doing deals with China?

26:14

Speaker C

They're super tight. The sheik's company in particular, I think it's called G42 was supposed to get 1/5 of the 500,000 of these Nvidia chips. They're super tight with a bunch of Chinese companies, including one called Huawei, which provides telecom infrastructure. And the United States has spent decades telling other countries to get Huawei the fuck out of their countries, places like the UK because there's concern that you could do create backdoor infrastructure to spy on them, which is why there was concern in the Biden administration about selling these chips to the Emiratis. And by the way, these are not, these are like the Blackwell series chips, like the best of the best Nvidia chips that no other countries can really get. Unless you're like a super close ally and partner of the US And. Yeah.

26:59

Speaker A

Or, or own almost half of World Liberty Financial.

27:38

Speaker C

Greece. The right guy.

27:41

Speaker B

Yeah. It's also, there's something struck, it struck me that it was the. Right before the inaugural. Right. That, that before he'd even taken office for a second time, he had already decided that he was going to be the most corrupt president in American history. And even saying that is an understatement, really. He was going to be as corrupt as the most corrupt autocrats in the history of the modern world. That he was already going to be a Putin level corrupt figure. And like, what would happen in a normal time in a functioning civil society? Yes, of course, there'd be impeachment hearings and his removal. But. But even maybe before that, there would be a Department of justice investigation. There would be congressional hearings, there would be outrage. That would continue. That would be bipartisan. There would be Republicans going up to the White House to say that it's time to step down because the country can't survive having a president this corrupt. Those are the normal things that you could imagine happening, how this would have worked. Even in the previous Republican administrations, we've never had anything this bad. And when I was a kid, I would obviously struggle with deadlines, and if I would hit a deadline, but if I missed it, I would never, just simply would never do the work. Right. If I had a paper due on a Monday and I missed the Monday, it was like, it never happened. Weeks, months, it would be a disaster.

27:42

Speaker C

I would do that, too.

28:53

Speaker B

Because once you're through the. Once you're on the other side of the stake, what's the point? And I do feel like that's where we're at with the Republicans. They've sort of. They have their one, impeachment is the mechanism or any kind of accountability. And because that is impossible, we are kind of through that. And now Trump can do anything. There's nothing they can't look past because they've looked past so much already. And, like, we talk about this all the time. It's so gobsmacking. It's so crazy. He should be impeached and removed. That is obvious. That's what should happen, but it can't. And so we sort of live in this world where there's no accountability yet.

28:53

Speaker A

It's also. It's just like, you can't write something this outrageously corrupt. Like, you can't make something like this up. It's like a Middle Eastern autocrat who also maybe does deal with the Chinese government for, like, an American asset that has, like, incredible national security implications that you're selling out for half a billion dollars for the president. Like, what?

29:27

Speaker B

It's just. Yeah, those chips are how we make pictures of women with six boobs. We can't have the Chinese get control of that technology. Next thing you know, it'll be saying things. Terrible, mediocre writing.

29:50

Speaker C

I mean, the thing is, the Emiratis, like, they have a bit of a DC Halo because they throw a lot of money around to think tanks. They hire a lot of former generals to come give speeches or consult for their military. They have an Ambassador who's been around for a long time, hosts a lot of events at Cafe Milano. You know, a bit of a man about town, but this is also a country that has been funding the other side of a absolutely devastating civil war in Sudan for the better part of two years. They're funding this group called the RSF that is leading to the worst humanitarian catastrophe on the planet right now. So I do think it's just worth thinking about, like, the foreign policy of the people that Trump did this deal with, because it is really gross when you kind of get past the bullshit and the glitterati fucking, you know, appetizer course at Cafe Milano and see what's actually happening.

30:03

Speaker A

I don't know the foreign policy of any of the governments he's done deals with that he likes. That is a good foreign policy.

30:51

Speaker C

Any good bribes.

30:59

Speaker A

Who's he? Yeah, who's he doing deals with around the world and for governments that they're not either, you know, repressing their own people or others or causing conflict.

31:00

Speaker C

He has a type, doesn't he?

31:08

Speaker B

The tensions are with the Canada and NATO and the like. The connection to me between the Epstein story and this is like these people are buying their credibility with their conferences and their, you know, and comedy festivals in Saudi Arabia. All the people that Trump is doing dealers with, they're sort of investing in the kind of appearance of polite society to lend them credibility. And it works. People make the trip, they take the money, and they use their wealth to kind of hide the monstrousness.

31:10

Speaker A

Yeah, I don't know if you guys saw that. Trump's also looking to steal another $10 billion from us. The American taxpayers earned it. President is suing the IRS for $10 billion with a B in damages over the leaking of his tax returns in 2019 and 2020. You might remember he's also suing the Justice Department for $230 million in damages. Seems like small potatoes now over the investigations that led to multiple grand juries indicting Trump on multiple criminal charges. And since the DOJ now does whatever Trump tells him to do, you can imagine that they may settle this case favorably for the president. Trump basically acknowledged the conflict on Saturday night when he was talking to reporters, though he seemed to just find the whole thing rather amusing. Take a listen.

31:42

Speaker D

I have to work out some kind of a settlement. I'm supposed to work out a settlement with myself. I think what we'll do is do something for charity. You know, we're thinking about doing something for charity where I'll give money to charity. We can make it a substantial amount. Nobody would care because it's going to go to numerous very good charities.

32:26

Speaker B

So he's going to steal $10 billion from the federal government and claim he's going to give it to charity? That's what he's saying.

32:45

Speaker C

But do the press conference on. In black tie. Yeah, because that's, that's fitting.

32:50

Speaker A

I think he was just, he was, yeah, he was at the Alfalfa dinner Saturday night, which is a bunch of, you know, elites just fucking cracking jokes. Yeah, yeah, Cracking jokes.

32:53

Speaker C

Monopoly.

33:03

Speaker B

How many people in that building were in the fucking.

33:03

Speaker A

Fucking. That's crazy. I realize that it's. The corruption isn't quite as. Maybe it's not as brazen or as big of a deal like globally as the UAE thing that we just talked about, but just taking $10 billion from the treasury for yourself, it's just lazy. It's, I mean, that I talk about like things that, that I think that would piss American, like more. I mean, yes, 10 billion. You know what, you know how much a one year extension of the Affordable Care act subsidies cost? $30 billion. That is a third of the extension that they said that we apparently cannot afford. 20 million people are seeing their premiums go up and yet he wants to pay $10 billion out of the treasury to himself just so he can promise to give it to many good charities.

33:05

Speaker C

Could have hired more ICE guys with this.

33:44

Speaker B

That's that. Yeah. Many other, many other possibilities. The President, United States is filing frivolous lawsuits against the United States so he.

33:46

Speaker A

Can use his position to settle them favorably.

33:55

Speaker B

It's again, just he should be impeached.

33:59

Speaker D

And removed from office.

34:02

Speaker B

We're just watching it unfold. When I was watching all this, the Epstein files and all the involvement of all these people inside the Trump administration, we didn't talk about Lutnicks in there. A lot of people are in there. And then you look at the, the UAE case, this lawsuit, there was a. CBS got their hands on a memo and if you saw this, of the Capitol, the insurrection. Prosecutors wrote a memo to congressional leaders. Do you see this? Where they recommended what Congress can do, because DOJ will obviously not do anything to investigate the immigration abuses, to investigate ICE and detention center abuses and other things. And they laid out all these things that Congress could do, which would be about preserving records in the case of inevitable prosecutions in the future. And the point they made is there are FBI agents and federal prosecutors who have left because they're disgusted with the politicization and sort of the capture of these bureaus that would be available to do these kinds of investigations. And whether it's as part of the midterms or whether it's a part of a kind of a presidential campaign, I do think talking about how Democrats are going to declare war on corruption and put a real program of like, I think it should be PrimeTime hearings, a 911 Commission like law that kind of says, here's how we're going to investigate this abuses of the power in power, the capture of the Department of Justice, the theft by the president, the corrupt acts by the president, and create like a kind of framework for how we're going to be treating this like a really big deal in the future, whether it's in 20, whether it's while Trump is in office or after, and as part of that. But bringing on prosecutors, bringing on law enforcement to help kind of lead a true kind of credible investigation through Congress.

34:03

Speaker A

I think is, we think Bob Mueller's up, too.

35:45

Speaker B

Yeah, let's get that guy out of the fucking mothballs. Him and Garland can team up and it'll be a won't they or won't.

35:47

Speaker C

They, like 100 years, they'll go up a case. Yeah. You mentioned Howard Lutnick. We should just mention he said he'd cut Jeffrey Epstein off in 2005. He told a really detailed story about how he and his wife walked into the house, saw a massage table, thought it was gross, never spoke to him again. Turns out he went to the island in 2012. So good job, Mr. Lutnick. I do enjoy Trump suing the IRS for these documents getting disclosed as he's having his hand picked. Goon Bill Pulte use his authority at the Federal Housing Authority to dig through mortgages and try to prosecute people that Trump doesn't like. That is kind of chef's kiss. Like, in some sense, in the narrow sense. Trump has a case in this instance because you can sue the government for breaches of privacy when it comes to IRS data. Of course he should have released his taxes when he ran for office. Of course, 20 billion is a absurd amount. Apparently. He's saying the $10 billion figure is a $1,000 per disclosure level that's specified in the law, multiplied by an estimate of the number of times that Trump's tax information was published or broadcast. That's how they did the math that got them to the clean 10 billion. Beloved. I was trying to think like, similar to your point about Congress, like, doing this just suggests you've given up on political considerations in any way. Because nothing could be more popular than suing for $10 billion or suing the taxpayers for $10 billion. And being on both sides of the transaction, he just clearly is so greedy that he does not care.

35:55

Speaker A

Yes, I think he doesn't care. And I think, you know, this is like, they feel like they're throwing so much stuff at us every single day. I mean, this was like Bannon, you know, at the beginning. It's like, oh, you do three horrible things a day. And the first two, you know, they can only. People can only pay attention to one, and the other two go under the radar. Right. And I do think you're right. Like Lovett, Democrats should make a huge deal of this. I think the challenge with the hearings and the investigations is the country most people want what's on their mind most of all is like, what are you gonna do for me? How are you gonna help me? And, like, you know, do I want a bunch of. I would just be like, we're getting all your money back. He stole a bunch of money from the country from you. He's. And he tried to sell out a bunch of the country as well. And we're getting it all back. We're getting your money back for you.

37:16

Speaker B

I think that's good. I think that's good.

38:02

Speaker A

We're going through the couch cushions and all the people who've gotten hurt, too. You're gonna be able to. That the government is hurt under Donald Trump because he broke the law. We're gonna make you right as well.

38:03

Speaker B

Yeah, I think that's right. I think you'd have to tie it back to the ways in which this was ultimately about pursuing his own interest at the expense of the country. I do think any broad investigation into Trump corruption will ultimately lead to tariff decisions and the higher cost people paid. But. And then I. And I do think you'd have to then, like, really make it clear that it's about not just sort of looking back, but about the reforms you would need. Right. Because you would. And you know what? Some of this is not going to be, like, top polling message. I think there'll be popular programs, but, no, not everything we're going to have to do to fix our democracy is going to be able to tie back to affordability. But, like, we got to figure out some kind of return to independent counsel. There are reasons that was allowed to expire, but, man, what a different world we'd be living in right now if three judges could appoint an independent counsel to investigate crimes by the president. Now they're Val, I don't know if the Supreme Court, which is now believed that the President is above the law and the unitary executive, like, I don't know what happens now. Would it be, it was held up in a, by like the vast majority of judges last time it was in front of the Supreme Court, would that happen again? I don't know. But constitutional amendments around the pardon power, stepping up, congressional oversight of the administration, like a lot of steps that we should be talking about that are forward looking about preventing this kind of thing from happening again and attacking the ways in which Trump abused his office. This one other just, you know, talking about inherent contempt is too late when the person who you're trying to get is already not reporting. I would like to start hearing congressional leaders start talking about the fact that whatever we do to investigate the Trump administration, that they will use, if necessary, inherent contempt to arrest and detain people who do not participate. That we need to, like Congress needs to start asserting it's, it's Article one, it's, it's first on the list. They need to start reasserting their authority and make clear that they will, if necessary, enforce subpoenas and hold people in contempt and make them testify.

38:14

Speaker A

Yeah. And then it'll be Congress's goons versus the federal government's goons facing off.

40:06

Speaker B

Yeah. And look, I don't know what. I just, I feel like we can't play chicken with them. And I just, we have to. And by the way, like, do I worry about that power being the hands of Republicans? Of course I do. Of course I do. But we have to assume that we can use the power effectively and make a case to the American people if we are able to win the Congress.

40:14

Speaker A

Tommy, to your point of Trump not caring about the politics, we got a. He talked more this weekend about the gigantic new commemorative arc. Arch.

40:32

Speaker B

Arch. It would be an arch.

40:41

Speaker A

Arch. Right.

40:42

Speaker B

I think an arc would be a.

40:42

Speaker A

Box arc, would be a golden arch. I'm thinking of the arc. We've got the golden arch. Word. Yeah. So it's a new arch he's constructing on the Virginia side of the Potomac. The Washington Post reported over the weekend that the latest plan is for the monument to be 250ft tall. Of course, that's for America's 250th anniversary. Of course. Happy birthday, America.

40:43

Speaker B

That's tall. That's a big arch.

41:04

Speaker A

It's 150ft taller than the Lincoln Memorial, only 40ft smaller than the Capitol, the U.S. capitol. The Lincoln Memorial will sit in the shadow of The Trump Arch. Fucking imagine. What an eyesore.

41:06

Speaker C

The one in St. Louis is 630ft tall.

41:24

Speaker A

That's.

41:27

Speaker C

This one sounds kind of lame.

41:28

Speaker B

Is this a good place to say that? I also think they fucked up the World War II memorial.

41:31

Speaker A

Okay? No, it's not. It's not the place for this.

41:34

Speaker B

I just think they didn't. I just think, like, it's. You know what? It's too fucking literal.

41:36

Speaker A

Okay, yeah, you're one of the. Yeah, here we are just living through this emergency, but let's go back and talk about that. He also announced that he's gonna be closing the Kennedy center, whose board he now controls, for two years, for a complete renovation. Who knows? Maybe it has to do with the fact that no one wants to perform there anymore. So he's like, no, no one's coming here. You know what? Then it's closed. That's it. It's done.

41:40

Speaker D

We can't.

42:02

Speaker B

Yeah, my birthday party is canceled.

42:03

Speaker C

Right?

42:05

Speaker A

Exactly. One Kennedy center event that did still take place last week, the world premiere of Melania, the documentary. Great box office numbers. You guys see that?

42:06

Speaker C

I had fun. I thought it was pretty entertaining. I saw it twice, I gotta say, on the arch. It doesn't bother me, because next Democrat's gonna shut this stupid thing down, right?

42:15

Speaker B

We can't.

42:24

Speaker C

This is not gonna be.

42:25

Speaker A

Well, if it's built by then, we're gonna bulldoze a whole arch.

42:25

Speaker C

I don't. How fast can you build a fucking giant arch? I have no idea.

42:27

Speaker A

That's a good point.

42:30

Speaker C

Maybe it's.

42:31

Speaker A

It would have to go up, especially one that's. I'm sorry. Taller than the Lincoln Memorial. We're making it bigger than the Lincoln Memorial. Come on. This is crazy.

42:31

Speaker C

Matches his ego.

42:38

Speaker B

I care less about Trump building arches that we can perhaps tear down or stop if they don't get finished. Obviously, he says he's gonna finish everything in a snap of. I don't know how the East Wing. The East Wing ballroom's going, but it seems to be slower than. Than originally predicted. I am worried about the Kennedy center in the grand scheme of. Trump abuses. If he fucks up the Kennedy center, it's a building. We'll be okay. But, you know, they have this obsession with, like, neoclassical architecture, Architecture that evokes, like, the Greeks and the Romans and the sort of classic forms, and it's sort of a vaguely fascist mind. But the Kennedy center is a beautiful place that I'm sure they don't appreciate. And then he's talked about wanting to Build a bigger entertainment complex. Have you seen this? In one of his posts he said not only are we going to renovate the Kennedy center, we're going to build a bigger and more beautiful entertainment complex. And like that's a beautiful building.

42:39

Speaker A

Like UFC cage match violence.

43:28

Speaker B

Yeah. And so I worry about them fucking that up because it's harder to fix.

43:31

Speaker A

Oh, you worry about it? You don't think they're going to nail it?

43:35

Speaker B

Well, I just think, I don't think, I don't think. I don't think that the techs are.

43:38

Speaker A

When I see that colony, a little.

43:41

Speaker C

Too rococo for me.

43:42

Speaker A

When I see what they did to the, the east wing colony, I can't.

43:45

Speaker B

Imagine, you know, because, you know, as they said in bdb, it's not baroque. Don't fix it. You know what I'm saying? No, you know, he's gonna up the Kennedy center for sure. I do prefer him focusing on architecture than. Yeah, no destruction of democracy.

43:47

Speaker A

He should be. Yeah. If he woke up every day for the next three years and just focused on the arch, I want to see.

44:02

Speaker B

Him blueprints, hard hats and like nothing else, ribbon cuttings. Anything like that is, is great. I agree. I agree.

44:06

Speaker A

Melania biggest grossing documentary in a decade.

44:13

Speaker C

Highest for the non music domestic doc.

44:17

Speaker A

They're very like couched because Taylor Swift's Aristor doc like opened up at like, you know, 10 times that. But also, also when you spend 7, when you spend $75 million, 40 for the DOC, 35 on the marketing and you make back 8 million in the opening.

44:21

Speaker C

You don't make that money. You net 3.5 because half goes to the theaters. I mean, yeah, all it took was 35 million in marketing and relentless promotion from the person in the world and current president Donald Trump to get, you know, it sounds like a bunch of old people in Trump areas went inside.

44:36

Speaker A

Women over. Women over 55 were like 70% of the.

44:51

Speaker C

And they also, you know, those people got to say we're sticking it to like liberal Hollywood because people had started making fun of expected to be a low open.

44:54

Speaker A

So we feel stuck.

45:02

Speaker C

Trump fans parting with their money to please him. No longer a surprise to me. I just, it's a bribe.

45:03

Speaker B

I found it just so like all the. There was a couple people that all like they pride themselves on being kind of free speech warriors for like tech Bros Finance guys praising the 8 million saying gotcha libs. And it's like I get that you didn't like wokeness because you thought it was about the feelings of People that you're not fans of. But your entire operation here seems to be at the feelings of Donald Trump because you seem to be involved in business. Is 75 million for a movie that makes 8 good business or is that a bribe in every fucking theater?

45:09

Speaker A

It is funny because none of them are saying like wow, what a great doc. And like our first lady is wonderful because they only care about being able to own the libs. With the documentary.

45:41

Speaker C

I'm pretty sure Melania had final cut. I mean she was like an EP on the project.

45:50

Speaker A

Yeah, she did.

45:54

Speaker C

It would all apparently look staged.

45:54

Speaker A

Of course she did.

45:56

Speaker C

The spend coincided with Amazon firing 16,000 people this year, 14,000 more last year. The thing but for Jeff Bezos, again, like, like, what is the point of having you money if you never say you like, what are you doing man?

45:57

Speaker A

I mean he does say it to the Amazon workers all the time. That's actually big. You to the Washington Post as well. He's saying a lot of you. Yeah, well, I guess just not to anyone. Powerful society.

46:10

Speaker C

When we all got to see the Brett Ratner photos spill out of the Epstein files, the director of Melania was all in the press this weekend for another reason too.

46:20

Speaker A

Another one part of the cabal was welcoming.

46:28

Speaker B

Was it Pete Hexa today when there's sort of a big, big kind of welcoming, he's sort of welcoming for what? Just I think he was getting a visit to, I don't know, wherever he sends up those penis rockets, I think. But I'm not sure. Check the facts on that. But yeah, there's sort of a despicable lack of kind of moral courage on the part of our wealthiest elites. Something that has come up several times during this program. Foreign. Save America is brought to you by Article. We love article. Article has great furniture. We have a bunch of great article furniture around the office. They also have a lot of great options if you're looking for something to like fit in in your home. If you need like a new TV stand, if you need a new dresser, if you need new bedside tables, they have a lot of great options that can fit in with a lot of styles. Article offers a curated range of mid century, modern, coastal and scandi inspired pieces that not only shine on their own, but also pair seamlessly with nearly any other article. Product Product. This thoughtful design approach makes it incredibly easy to mix and match, helping you create a space that feels cohesive and stylish. Article takes great care in curating its collection, focusing solely on high quality, meaningful pieces that will stand the test of time. There's no filler. Every item is chosen for its craftsmanship, design and lasting value. Article offers fast, affordable shipping across the US and Canada with options for professional assembly if you prefer a hands off experience. Article's Customer Care is available seven days a week, offering knowledgeable support and even free interior design services to help you get your home just right. With articles 30 day satisfaction guarantee, you can shop with confidence, knowing that if you're not completely in love with your new furniture, you can easily return in. Article is offering our listeners $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. To claim, visit article.comcrooked and the discount will be applied at checkout. That's article.comcrooked for $50 off your first purchase of$100 or more.

46:31

Speaker A

Positive America is brought to you by HIMSS. Ed is more common than you think and simpler to treat than ever. Through himss, you can connect online with a licensed provider to access personalized treatment options discreetly and on your terms. Through hims, you can access personalized prescription treatment options for ED if prescribed. HIMS offers access to ED treatment options ranging from personalized products to trusted generics that cost 95% less than brand names if prescribed. You shouldn't have to go out of your way to feel like yourself. Hims brings expert care straight to you with 100% online access to personalized treatments that put your goals first. This isn't one size fits all care that forgets you in the waiting room. It's your health and goals put first with real medical providers making sure you get what you need to get results. Thing of HIMS is your digital front door that gets you back to your old self with simple 100% online access to trusted treatments for ED and more. All in one place. To get simple online access to personalized affordable care for ED, weight loss and more, visit himss.comcrooked that's hims.comcrooked for your free online visit himss.comcrooked featured products include compounded drug products which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety, effectiveness or quality. Prescription required. See website for details, restrictions and important safety information. Actual price will depend on product, product and subscription plan. It's been a week since Trump told reporters that his paramilitary squads would, quote de escalate a little bit after they killed two American citizens in Minneapolis. Since then, the president has called Alex Preddy an insurrectionist whose quote stock has gone way down and told reporters that he actually won't be pulling back the operation in Minnesota. A federal judge there also just declined to Block Operation Metro Surge, at least for now. Ice, which had issued guidance earlier last week saying that they'd be returning to targeted enforcement operations, issued a new internal memo on Friday giving agents the green light to arrest people without a warrant. Then on Saturday, Trump was asked about his announcement that federal agents would only respond to protests in Democratic led cities if they ask for help. Here's what he said. Back to your post on ICE protests. What did you mean when you said people will suffer an equal or greater.

48:19

Speaker D

Consequence if they do anything bad to our people? They will be, they will have to suffer. I'm sorry. They will get taken care of in at least an equal way. You know, you see it the way they treat our people. And I said, you're allowed. If somebody does that, you can do something back. You're not going to stand there and take it.

50:21

Speaker A

You know, I think they already know.

50:42

Speaker C

That that's not how the justice system works.

50:43

Speaker A

Yeah, they did murder two people in public. So I do, I think they know that they can do whatever they want.

50:45

Speaker B

I think you think of the original.

50:50

Speaker C

Yeah, that's the original.

50:51

Speaker B

That's like, you know, that's just as classic.

50:53

Speaker C

Yes.

50:55

Speaker A

Old Testament justice. Literally.

50:58

Speaker C

Another book he has not read, but yes.

51:01

Speaker A

How you guys feeling about the de escalation? Are we de escalating?

51:04

Speaker C

I interpret everything through the prism of Donald Trump. His personal reaction to seeing things on cable TV that he does not like. To the extent there are changes, it is to discourage that from happening again. Hopefully there's. It creates improvements on the margins for communities affected. But I just, I have no hope for the underlying policy as long as Trump and Stephen Miller running the show. Unfortunately.

51:07

Speaker B

Yeah, we have. Homan said there will be a reduction in forces. There's an objective way to know if they are pulling back and that it's getting some of these people out of Minneapolis. And regardless, like, I do think whatever they were planning to do after Minneapolis, I have to think that what has happened there and then Twin Cities has changed what was going to happen next. Right.

51:29

Speaker A

Because I mean, they did cancel Maine.

51:50

Speaker B

They canceled Maine.

51:51

Speaker A

They need that Senate seat. Even though they all hate Susan Collins.

51:52

Speaker B

And so Susan, Susan Collins got that word from Nome that they were going to pull out of which they called, by the way. She said it was called catch of the day.

51:54

Speaker A

Yeah.

52:01

Speaker B

Disgusting. But whether there were rumors about them going to Philly and other places, we don't know. But it does seem like it has at least whatever Trump says in the moment, as Tommy said, like they are react, they are at least aware that they need to change the images on screen.

52:01

Speaker A

Also, Kristi Noem just announced body cams. Everyone's gonna get body cams. It's a good thing they're trying to get ahead of this now that the. They've negotiated an extra two weeks over DHS funding. And one of the, you know, one of the demands was body cams. Look, on the body cams thing, I'm like, great, fine. But we have a lot of these. We have a lot of this violence, killing and all kinds of other lawlessness by Ice on Video. And it doesn't seem to be working all that well since we barely got an investigation into Alex Preddy's death and the federal government has refused to open investigation into Renee Goode's death. So not great. But yeah, I mean, I think that. I think to me this is like, keep up the pressure. Yeah, right. Because they are not going to do any of this on their own. When you do pressure them and you do make a big deal out of this, you do start getting some improvements on the margins and you can't let up because if you let up, they will just go right back to doing what they do. And all the pressure in the world is still not going to solve the problem, but at least it's going to make some improvement.

52:18

Speaker B

Yeah, I also would say that body cams are also on when would be on in places where people no longer have their phones. Right. And so. And there was a report out of the Twin Cities about somebody that was brought to a hospital. He had terrible injuries to his face and injuries to his brain, like multiple fractures. And the federal agents claimed that he had run into a wall. The nurses and health providers denied that, didn't think that. Well, or at least felt that seemed not credible, including someone else. They had not kept their stories straight. And so we just have no idea what's going on behind closed doors. A lot of reports about what's happening in these detention facilities that are awful. And so look, body cams.

53:25

Speaker C

Well, on the body cams you need mandatory activation of the body cameras. You need some sort of clear rules around retention of the footage and access to it. So there's a lot of ways to of just slap a body cam on someone for it to mean nothing. I think that the results are mixed regardless, but at least there's transparency, hopefully if done right.

54:15

Speaker B

Well, to your point, like the no amount of reform. No, no, no protections will work if law. If the federal agents know that their bosses will protect him even when they break the law. Which is why you have them lying. And what, you can't trust what's coming out of ice, you can't trust Noam. So, yeah, like the main problem is, well, one major problem, regardless of what we get through law, is the fact that their leadership will defend these people even if they commit terrible crimes against people.

54:34

Speaker A

One piece of good news out of Minnesota is that 5 year old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father Adrian are back home with their mother and brother after a federal judge ordered them to be immediately released from a Texas detention facility. In a scathing ruling that accused the government of cruelty, lawlessness and traumatizing children. Texas Congressman Joaquin Castro, who had visited Liam and Adrian last week, personally accompanied them home. Unfortunately, Liam's case is in no way isolated. The New York Times reports over the weekend that at least 3,800 children under 18, including 20 infants, were arrested and detained by federal agents last year. Since March of last year, more than 1700 children have been stuck in detention centers. What'd you guys make of the judge's ruling and whether all of this might help help other children who are being detained under just horrific conditions right now?

55:02

Speaker C

I mean, I, I think all of us felt like this is one of the most sickening stories you've seen in a while. Locals say ICE tried to use this kid as a bait. DHS was like attacking his father repeatedly. He's a pending asylum claim. It sounds like these people are trying to come to the country the right way. Like Liam is out, thank God, because of a massive outcry and because of attention to his case. Like shout out to Congressman Castro that that's incredible what he did. Like, exactly how you should be using your power in this moment to draw attention to issues and also get change at the margins. But we can't replicate that in all these cases. And there's horror stories of people in detention of ICE or CBP detention in places all across the country. It's so fucked up that they were picked up in Minnesota, they take them to Texas, then they've been releasing people in Texas who have no connections there. How the hell are you supposed to get back home? You're just a migrant, you have no money, you have no connections, you don't know anyone there. Maybe you don't have your phone. So I don't know, like, I'm glad to see this little kid is out. God knows what trauma you know, will stick with him for life.

55:51

Speaker A

I mean, you know, when Congressman Castro visited last week, his report after visiting to everyone was that Liam was depressed he was sleeping the whole time he was there. He was sick. And now we find out that the Dilley Immigration center in Texas where Liam was being held, there's now a measles outbreak there. So it's real HHS and DHS really working together to fuck up the country on this one.

56:52

Speaker B

Yeah. When Trump did family separation, like, they never successfully reunited with hundreds of kids with their families. Like, a lot of the stories you're hearing are from citizens whose spouses are non citizens and they're safely in the country. They can call lawyers, they can get help, but there are people that have no connections once they're picked up, and they are just in the system silent. We have no idea what's going on with them. And we know that they're making mistakes, that they're losing track of people, that they're not able to keep the records. I mean, they're standing up a mass deportation program as quickly as they can with a bunch of incompetent doofs on the ones and twos. So it's just an. Absolutely. It's a mix of cruelty and, like, the malevolence of it combined with just a gross incompetence across the board, knowing that they will. That as long as the Republicans are in power, they will never face accountability for it.

57:16

Speaker A

I don't know if you guys caught the Star Tribune story about the conditions inside the federal detention center in Minneapolis. I think it's Whippold. I think you guys visited, right? But there are reports of one meal a day, overflowing toilets, denial of medical care, cells so crowded that people had to take turns lying down because there was enough room for everyone to sleep. And, you know, the Trump administration continues to try to. To ban lawmakers from surprise visits to detention centers. A judge, once again, just blocked that policy. Judges keep saying no. The law says that they can go whenever they want. They're members of Congress. And the Trump administration just pretends it's not the law because for what we were saying earlier, right, like, there's no. No cameras inside there. Right. No one's filming with their phones. There's no body cam. So we don't know what's happening in the detention centers. They're also buying up new warehouses all across the country because they want to, like, build more of these detention centers. They're treating people like absolute fucking dog shit. In. I mean, I think 32 people died in ICE custody last year, 17 in Customs and Border Patrol custody. And in January alone of this year, six people have already died.

58:05

Speaker B

There was that Other case where the administration was claiming it was suicide, but the evidence suggests it might not be a suicide. And.

59:07

Speaker A

No.

59:13

Speaker B

The coroner.

59:15

Speaker A

The autopsy.

59:16

Speaker B

Autopsy.

59:16

Speaker C

Yeah.

59:17

Speaker B

That it wasn't a suicide. So, like, we're just. We're not getting the truth out of these places. They want the notice because, you know, it's like a Jesus, come and look busy situation. Like, they want to have a chance to. To be ready for any inspections. And I just would wonder if, like, to people that would defend the administration on this. What if Cheesecake Factory announced that they'd only allow health inspections with a week notice? Do you think that you would want to go eat there?

59:17

Speaker C

No. And corporations are making a lot of money. I mean, the Financial Times reported that companies including Palantir and Deloitte have collectively made more than $22 billion in contracts at the heart of the ice crackdown.

59:37

Speaker A

So I think, like you said, Castro going like, more Democrats should visit these detention centers. I think that's a good. It is a good use of your power right now. So we haven't had a chance to talk about Trump's DOJ arresting Don Lemon on Friday, along with another independent journalist named Georgia Fort and several activists, all of whom were charged in connection with the January 18 anti ice protest at a Minnesota church. You'll remember that both a magistrate judge and a federal judge refused to sign off on the government's initial attempt to get an arrest warrant for Lemon and his producer with a federal judge ruling, quote, there is no evidence that those two engaged in any criminal behavior or conspired to do so. So, but here we are. How big of a deal is this.

59:48

Speaker B

When the Department of Justice is arresting people for doing journalism, using a kind of specious application of a law? Because the Attorney General is a tool of the president, and regardless of whether the case is upheld, just trying to get a good news cycle to stay in his good crisis. Like, we are in a such a dangerous place. Pam Bondi is so. Is just such an empty vessel. What a complete, like, morally vacuous. Just an empty, empty shell of a human being. And so you just look at what Pam Bondi is willing to do. Like, I just don't think there's a bottom. I think she's worried about public embarrassment. I think she's worried about what Trump thinks. I think she's worried about bad headlines, but she has no ethical compunctions. Like, nothing will stop her from doing this.

1:00:29

Speaker A

Or just like her friend and colleague Kristi Noem, Pete Hexseth and Stephen Miller.

1:01:16

Speaker C

And all, all that's why you pick a bunch of middling, incompetent mediocrities to run your agencies. I think it's a huge deal. John Lemon might get out.

1:01:22

Speaker B

He.

1:01:30

Speaker C

A judge might toss this case. It's an obvious First Amendment violation, but the. The process is the punishment. It's scary, it's expensive, it's intimidating, and it's not happening in a vacuum. The feds raided a Washington Post reporter's house recently. They took her devices. The Pentagon is forcing its press corps to basically try to. Try to get them to sign rules that said they'd run stories by them before reporting. He's suing half the press, Cor. He's intimidating people to make better coverage. I mean, now the TikTok US operations are owned by a bunch of Trump lackeys. Like, the state of the free press in this country is going in a bad direction.

1:01:32

Speaker A

The indictment is ridiculous, too, because it's like, you know, basically what they have to prove because they're charging the Face act, which says that you. It was originally for abortion clinics, for processing outside abortion clinics, but it's also for churches as well. Right. Like, you can't. And it says it makes it a crime to use force, threats, or physical obstruction to intentionally interfere with anyone seeking to exercise their rights. Right. Of religious freedom at a house of worship or to intentionally damage the property. Right. And so it's not trespassing. Right. Like, you have a trespassing case if you say, okay, this is a private church. People came into the church. We told them to leave. They wouldn't leave. Trespassing. That's not what they're charging here. They're charging this. The face act. Right. And so to make that stick, you have to. You can't say that Don Lemon just came into the church with the protesters. You have to say that Don Lemon was threatening and obstructing and all this kind of stuff. And so they have these. The indictment reads like. And then he just starts, like, peppering the pastor with questions, threateningly with the questions.

1:02:06

Speaker B

He, like, menacingly puts his hand out and.

1:02:59

Speaker A

And the right is. You know, I saw Scott Jennings tweeted this, but he was like, oh, so Democrats position now is that if you are holding your phone up and filming something, that you can break any law, because then you just call yourself a journalist. It's like, no.

1:03:01

Speaker C

Oh, come on, man.

1:03:14

Speaker A

That is. So they were like, he shouldn't have just. He shouldn't have charged into the church. And it's like, again, there's like a. There's lesser charges, and there's lesser things to do to someone who walk into a church who is clearly interviewing the pastor, the other officials everywhere, like he was physically obstructing and threatening them.

1:03:15

Speaker B

It's such a ridiculous defense, because if Pam Bondi had not charged on them with this, it wouldn't be like he was on the outside being like, pam Bondi should charge him with this. It would never have occurred to anyone a million years.

1:03:33

Speaker A

Well, and the other thing is, how many ridiculous. How many departments of Justice. Right. When a magistrate judge refused to issue the criminal warrant, and then it gets kicked up to a federal judge. First of all, what Department of Justice would say, oh, the magistrate judge said, no criminal, no arrest warrant. We really want to get this person. So we're gonna go up and we're gonna appeal it. So then they appeal it to a federal judge, and the federal judge is like, no, there's no evidence for this whatsoever. And then the Department of Justice is like, fuck that federal judge. We're going to a grand jury where we know we can get an indictment much easier because. Because the defense doesn't have to offer any kind of evidence whatsoever.

1:03:42

Speaker C

You're not there for it. You're not even present.

1:04:16

Speaker A

There's no judge there at all. So we'll go that route. That is the authoritarian nature of what they're doing. Right. Continuing to look for ways to arrest Don Lemon even after multiple judges and federal prosecutors have quit over this, too. There's another eight federal prosecutors, by the way, just broke before we were recording, who were in the Minnesota office who are quitting as well.

1:04:17

Speaker B

It's the court. It's the core distinction.

1:04:37

Speaker A

You.

1:04:39

Speaker B

You find a crime, and then you look for the person who perpetrated it.

1:04:40

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:04:43

Speaker B

You don't find a person and then look for the crime that they committed. They are doing that is what they do. That is Pambondi's main role. I think it might have something to do with why the DOJ is having to recruit on Twitter now, because they. Everywhere, every time they try to do one of these things, a bunch of people quit. And they are trying to figure out how to replace career and seasoned professional prosecutors with fucking bozo goons from the.

1:04:43

Speaker A

If you. If you're. You're a blue check who's ever posted Pepe the Frog, come. Come join the Department of Justice. We need you.

1:05:01

Speaker B

And by the way, explicitly saying, if you support. Support President Trump.

1:05:07

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:05:10

Speaker B

And our crime agenda. Anti crime agenda.

1:05:11

Speaker C

Well, really, it is a crime agenda.

1:05:14

Speaker B

I had to write the first Time. But, yeah, like, just absolutely going.

1:05:16

Speaker A

Not to be outdone by Pam Bondi, Tulsi Gabbard is also out there trying to score points with Trump in the MAGA media world. Last week, Dan and I talked about the FBI raid on the Fulton county elections office in Georgia, where a photo showed Tulsi talking on the phone in a baseball cap.

1:05:19

Speaker B

Like a really ominous.

1:05:33

Speaker C

Yeah, real ominous.

1:05:34

Speaker B

Seeing the head of the head of National Intelligence.

1:05:35

Speaker C

It's like you're trying to be kind of trying to hide, but you're not doing a very good job of it. Spy chief, like, baseball hat.

1:05:37

Speaker D

Just stay out of the picture.

1:05:43

Speaker A

It's not that hard. So now we know. The New York Times reports on Monday that the day after the raid, Tulsi facilitated a call between some of those same FBI agents and Donald Trump himself. They got a direct line right to the President. The call was short, according to a U.S. official who, quote, compared the conversation to a pep rally or a coach giving an encouraging halftime speech to his players. Isn't that wonderful? This is not the. It's not the only Gabbard story in the news, though. The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that a U.S. intelligence official has filed a whistleblower complaint alleging wrongdoing on Gabbard's part that is supposedly so highly classified that the complaint is kept locked in a safe. And it allegedly implicates another federal agency as well, who would like to take a stab at what the hell Tulsi Gabbard has been up to.

1:05:44

Speaker C

Sure, I'd love to. So I think the key to understanding what Tulsi is doing up to in both these cases is, is if you think back to last year, March of 2025, Tulsi testifies for Congress, and she says Iran has not decided to get a nuclear weapon. A few months later, Trump decides he wants to bomb anyway. He's asked about her comments, and he says, I don't care what she thinks. A couple days later, she revises her views so that the intelligence case matches Donald Trump's opinion. It's best practices in the intel world. Fast forward to January 1, 2026, first day of this year. Tulsi posts a photo of herself on the beach in Hawaii doing yoga. And then two days later, the United States invades Venezuela. She was completely cut out of the planning of that operation. I think she's seen that she is, like, on the outs with Trump. Doesn't want to get fired.

1:06:30

Speaker B

Not much of a warrior post.

1:07:13

Speaker C

Yeah, she's hemorrhaged. Think about it. She's hemorrhaged her policy principle. She was an anti regime change person. Right. That was her big thing. She served in Iraq, didn't want regime change wars, hence supporting Trump. Fine with those now. So now she's like, whatever. I do think there's a deep state. I'm fine being like the fraud czar. That the IG Report thing is. Is crazy. I think think like, my total speculation guess is that there's some intelligence that implicates someone close to Trump. Like a hypothetical one is you could imagine a whistleblower talking about Jared Kushner who doesn't have a clearance, not part of the government getting access to intelligence information or sharing intelligence information with foreign officials. Or Steve Witkoff for flying around the world and negotiating with Vladimir Putin on WhatsApp or whatever the hell he's doing. And, like, the reason it could be so sensitive is maybe we learned about this through collection on the other countries. And it's so sensitive. I'm making all this up. Like, this is just purely hypothetical, but it's really weird.

1:07:14

Speaker A

It's really weird.

1:08:12

Speaker C

And she has an obligation when there is a whistleblower complaint like this to brief it to Congress. And I think two weeks after receiving it, and they haven't done that, and that's a huge breach.

1:08:13

Speaker B

Yeah. It's not an avocado. It's not like they're waiting for it to ripen. It's not like the information in that. That safe is getting less inconvenient for them. And what's strange in the story is you see that they're kind of trying to figure out a way around sharing some of it they were flirting with, talking about executive privilege and other ways of getting out of sharing all of it with Congress. But the sort of the lamentation like, we don't know what to do with this thing.

1:08:24

Speaker C

Follow the law, right?

1:08:48

Speaker B

Show it to Congress.

1:08:49

Speaker C

You don't have a choice.

1:08:50

Speaker A

Also, just not for nothing, but the President of the United States talking through the intelligence director directly to the FBI agents who participated in a raid on a county elections office in which the President himself has been implicated in a crime way back a couple seasons ago, right? That he's now trying to cover up or do whatever.

1:08:51

Speaker C

Imagine Avril Haines, Joe Biden's dni, being at the Mar? A Lago Ray, tossing her phone on speaker. And Joey gives an attaboy to the troops there, you know, raiding Melania's underwear drawer or wherever the fuck they are.

1:09:18

Speaker A

Not even, like, not even going through Alex Jones fever dream, right? They're just going right over the whole chain of command and the FBI just right. It's just the agents on the ground. Trump wants to. Because he's a, he's like. It's like a coach during halftime.

1:09:28

Speaker B

Yeah, I think it's wishful thinking. Yeah, it's wishful thinking to think this is part of a cover up. I think this is sort of a drumming up of something new and fake. Yeah, this is about this. I think this is about future election theft, not past election theft.

1:09:39

Speaker A

Well, it's both, because for him, he wants just, we got to set the record straight about 2020 and we got to make some arrests. So then we go. Then we can go to the future, too.

1:09:49

Speaker B

Yeah, you're right.

1:09:57

Speaker C

He said something today to Dan Bongino, who was until recently the deputy director of the FBI about federalizing elections in 15 of the crooked states or something like that. So, yeah, he's got it on the mind.

1:09:57

Speaker B

Yeah, he's been on that beat. He's been on that beat. So, yeah, they will take whatever they found. They will use it to claim that this is the reason there's some pretext for some, some, Some takeover.

1:10:10

Speaker C

He said we should take over the voting in at least 15 places. The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting because we have states that are so crooked.

1:10:19

Speaker B

Well, the worse the polling gets, I think the more animated this project.

1:10:26

Speaker A

They have good reason to worry because on Saturday, Democrats flipped a Trump +17 state Senate seat in Texas, winning it by roughly 14 points. That is a 31 point swing. The Democratic candidate, Taylor Remitt, a union president and Air Force veteran, defeated the Trump backed candidate, Lee Wambsgands.

1:10:29

Speaker B

I know, I saw any relation. I was like, I saw the name Wambsgands. I was like, how is that even possible? That was a made up comedy name.

1:10:49

Speaker A

Yeah, the Dutch name.

1:10:56

Speaker D

Yeah.

1:10:58

Speaker A

It was a runoff for the 9th district around Fort Worth. Again, this is a state Senate district, but about a million people in that district, so big district. The day before and the day of the election, Trump had posted a truth social in support of Wambsgans, giving her his cherished endorsement and calling her phenomenal and a quote, true MAGA warrior. But here's how Trump reacted to her loss.

1:10:59

Speaker B

On Sunday, a Democrat won the special.

1:11:19

Speaker A

Election in an area that you had won by 17 points.

1:11:22

Speaker B

What is your reaction to that?

1:11:26

Speaker D

I don't know. I didn't hear about it. Somebody ran where in Texas.

1:11:27

Speaker B

A special election for legislators. The ninth state Senate seat.

1:11:30

Speaker D

I'm not involved in that. That's a local Texas race. You mean I won by 17 team and this person lost. Things like that happen.

1:11:33

Speaker B

It's true.

1:11:44

Speaker A

They do happen.

1:11:45

Speaker C

Things do happen.

1:11:45

Speaker A

Might happen a lot more. What do you guys think about the a lot of hype around this Overhyped, underhyped. What do you think?

1:11:46

Speaker B

I think. Well, I saw people making a Senate map where if this, if we see if we have a Senate map where if there's a swing of 31 points or roughly 31 points, it would mean Democrats would be able to get to 59 or more 50, 60 Senate.

1:11:52

Speaker A

So straightforward from here.

1:12:05

Speaker B

Fun to think about. Look, whatever the implications of a specific special election at a moment of just absolute kind of Trump doldrums and sort of dissatisfaction in the country. And the question I had about it was though, is there really something happening with between Alex Preddy, the anti second amendment stuff, the turn against ice, the lack of focus on affordability, the endless, endless headlines about Trump taking over the Kennedy center and building arches. Like is there something deeper happening? Is there an actual sort of weakness in his not base of support? But whatever the two columns over, is that real and could it be lasting? Is this a low watermark or is it the beginning of a real unraveling? I just don't think we know.

1:12:07

Speaker C

Yeah, I was thrilled to see Tom Wambsgan's in Death by Lightning, which I watched one episode of.

1:12:51

Speaker A

Isn't it great?

1:12:56

Speaker B

It's about the president getting close.

1:12:57

Speaker C

Quite good.

1:12:59

Speaker B

Yeah.

1:12:59

Speaker A

Garfield.

1:12:59

Speaker B

But really was it was the doctors, the doctors digging around in there. The doctors dug. Doctors dug around in there. First epo.

1:13:00

Speaker C

I talked to Bobby Polito about this race in the interview today. First of all, everyone check it out. He's really cool. He was in town to go to the Grammys cuz he was Grammy nominated.

1:13:08

Speaker B

That's where the traffic.

1:13:15

Speaker A

Careful. That's where they get you. Don Lemon, let's ask on Lemon about.

1:13:16

Speaker C

That very interesting guy. Not your traditional congressional candidate, but like you know, I was talking to him about his district and you know, the, the gerrymander that's happened in Texas and whether he thinks that Republicans may have over over torqued it and he feels pretty optimistic that they have over assumed their ongoing support with Latino voters in particular. And you know, this, you know, state Senate seat is one little indication of that. But there might be a broader set of numbers coming our way.

1:13:18

Speaker A

At least three of the five seats that they squeezed out of there in the, in their gerrymander I think could be at risk.

1:13:47

Speaker B

Now I was, listen, I wanted to say that they've over gerrymandered. Then I was told that that was w wishful thinking and now it's back to not being just wishful thinking. There was a mention, there was a consensus.

1:13:54

Speaker A

Was it nimby Twitter weeks?

1:14:06

Speaker B

It was not Nimby Twitter. Don't get me started on nimby Twitter when I was unbelievable what's happening with nimby Twitter here in Los Angeles. But the point I was making is only that I think we back. Are we back into saying that they may have over gerrymandered? That it's back to being possible because it was seen as Pollyannish for a while? That's all I'm saying it was.

1:14:07

Speaker C

You were so right so early.

1:14:27

Speaker B

I didn't know. I'm not saying I knew to your.

1:14:29

Speaker A

Point about something deeper happening. So this was a runoff this election. The first election was in November. So the same district and all the Republican candidates combined versus the Democratic candidates combined. It was GOP plus five. So that was good enough for Democrats. That was plus five in a Trump 17 plus 17 district. And this was then 14 points. So there was another like 20 point swing just between November and what is it, February?

1:14:32

Speaker C

And the Republican had way more money.

1:15:03

Speaker A

And so now turnout was low, right? Turnout was about probably a third of what, seven people. Yeah, right now. So it's about a hundred thousand voters. It's about a third of what you'll get. Maybe people in Texas who know this kind of stuff, estimate for the, for the midterms, about a third of what you'll get and you know, lower for a special. But it wasn't low. And then like highly concentrated Democrat it was because about 50% plus of the voters were Republican primary voters. So that means that the Democrat won by a lot of Republicans or a lot of independents especially, and some Republicans deciding to change their votes, which is huge.

1:15:07

Speaker C

Well, luckily today in the Texas Senate race, everything seems copacetic. Everyone involved in that primary, gosh, no one is posting videos.

1:15:43

Speaker A

I think it's important to take random tiktoks and then decide that they're gospel.

1:15:52

Speaker C

For those who don't know what we're talking about. There seems to be some sort of beef, but between James Talarico, the former.

1:15:56

Speaker A

Candidate in the race, I don't know, and Colin Allred.

1:16:01

Speaker C

And Colin, who we really like, he's been on the show. Cool guy. I don't know what's happening down there. I wish they would just pick up the phone, talk on the phone. Yeah.

1:16:04

Speaker A

One thing we should do is win the Texas Senate race. And so that's just. That's just something everyone should be thinking about.

1:16:11

Speaker C

I love to.

1:16:16

Speaker A

Or at least try. Try. Right. We should not try to win the race. Maybe. Maybe not throw the race before it happens. That's one thing that we should think about.

1:16:17

Speaker B

I don't know.

1:16:23

Speaker A

I don't know. It's just a thought. We do need it. We do need it.

1:16:24

Speaker C

We do like to win that one.

1:16:27

Speaker B

Oh, my God. It was just a.

1:16:28

Speaker A

We need Texas. Let's get those electoral votes someday, too.

1:16:30

Speaker C

Also, one day.

1:16:33

Speaker B

One day those Texas electoral votes are going to come along.

1:16:34

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:16:36

Speaker B

Everybody loosely with the football.

1:16:37

Speaker A

And if they don't, there won't be a Democratic president.

1:16:38

Speaker B

Hey, hey, hey. There won't be even if. Either way.

1:16:40

Speaker D

So just saying there's a downs.

1:16:44

Speaker B

Don't blame Texas.

1:16:46

Speaker C

Speaking of Democratic presidents, as we were recording, Bill and Hillary, Hillary Clinton agreed to testify in the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.

1:16:47

Speaker A

I heard that. I heard they. They rejected them.

1:16:54

Speaker D

Now they don't want them.

1:16:56

Speaker A

Yeah, I heard they still want to. They want to go forward with contempt.

1:16:57

Speaker B

It's like, hey, guys, take a win. Can you see you belong together?

1:17:00

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:17:06

Speaker B

It's like. Also, by the way, James Comer, Listen, I know it sounds like I'm a partisan Democrat and I am, but, like, how would some fucking inherent contempt feel right now, huh? Put a little pep in your step, huh, James Comer.

1:17:06

Speaker A

I'm sure that's where they were headed.

1:17:16

Speaker B

A couple sergeant arms.

1:17:17

Speaker A

I'm sure that's what they. I'm sure. Maybe that's why they're rejecting it.

1:17:18

Speaker B

Honestly, I don't know.

1:17:20

Speaker A

Arrest him. No matter what, they're going to show up at the hearing at the scheduled time in the scheduled room, and they're still going to arrest.

1:17:21

Speaker B

I don't like the cut of your jib. Arrest them.

1:17:26

Speaker C

And then Trump's going to do a conference call with. With the whole room.

1:17:28

Speaker A

Yeah. Until. Don't worry, Kelsey's going to be there anyway. When we come back, we will have Tommy's interview with congressional candidate Bobby Polit.

1:17:31

Speaker B

This podcast is sponsored by Strawberry Me. Let me ask you something. You think LeBron, Patrick Mahomes or Serena got to the goat status by guessing?

1:17:48

Speaker C

No. No coaching.

1:17:55

Speaker B

They had coaching and some talent and a lot of talent. Genetics. There's an interesting paradox. I don't know if you call it a paradox, but there's a statistical thing that emerges that confuses people about the interplay between training and talent. When you look at High performance athletes. Because when you pull out the high performance athletes and you do the comparison between training and talent, it looks as though the training is not helpful. But it's only a kind of statistical anomaly that naturally emerges from when you look at high talented people in a way that I'm not gonna spend any more time on because this is an ad for coaching Strawberry me. Strawberry me.

1:17:57

Speaker C

Who does Patrick Mahomes play for?

1:18:34

Speaker B

Quick.

1:18:35

Speaker C

Keep it in.

1:18:38

Speaker B

I don't know.

1:18:39

Speaker C

Chiefs.

1:18:40

Speaker B

Chiefs? Yeah, Chiefs.

1:18:41

Speaker C

His team teammate dates Taylor Swift.

1:18:42

Speaker B

I. Oh, I know. I know about that. I know about. I know about Travis and the brother. They have a good relationship. But Strawberry me. My. My favorite coach is Coach Kerr because he was on PODC America. Dan interviewed him once, remember?

1:18:44

Speaker C

No, that was Steve Kerr.

1:18:56

Speaker B

Wait, who's. Who did I say?

1:18:57

Speaker C

I thought you meant Coach K. Oh.

1:18:59

Speaker A

No, the Duke guy.

1:19:01

Speaker B

Right.

1:19:02

Speaker A

He's right.

1:19:03

Speaker D

Coach Kerr.

1:19:04

Speaker B

Yeah. Sorry. Okay, sure.

1:19:04

Speaker C

I thought you meant Coach K. K?

1:19:07

Speaker B

Who's Coach K?

1:19:09

Speaker C

Duke guy.

1:19:11

Speaker A

Cuz Coach Kerr is a huge lib.

1:19:11

Speaker C

He is a huge lib. Sorry. You know what? I. I wrongly fact checked you.

1:19:13

Speaker B

Strawberry me.

1:19:17

Speaker C

This ad's going great.

1:19:17

Speaker B

Matches you with a professional career coach who breaks down your game film. They help you negotiate that raise, navigate the politics, and execute a game plan that actually works. And the cost? Think about it. One raise, one promotion, and this coaching pays for itself 10 times over. That's the best ROI in the game. Stop riding the bench in your own life life. Go to Strawberry Me crooked today and get 50% off your first coaching session. Strawberry me. Because pros don't guess. They get coached to win.

1:19:18

Speaker D

Five years ago, I was paying $65.

1:19:44

Speaker B

A month for my subscriptions.

1:19:46

Speaker D

Today, those Same subscriptions cost $111 and.

1:19:48

Speaker B

I don't even use half of them anymore.

1:19:51

Speaker D

That's why now I use Rocket Money.

1:19:53

Speaker B

To manage my subscriptions for me. The app gives you a list of.

1:19:55

Speaker D

All your subscriptions and reminds you of upcoming payments so you're not hit with any surprise charges.

1:19:58

Speaker B

On top of that, it also sends.

1:20:03

Speaker D

You alerts when subscription prices go up, so you always know the price you're paying. If you decide you no longer want a subscription, you can cancel it right from the app.

1:20:04

Speaker B

No customer service needed. And the best part is, Rocket Money even reaches out and tries to get you refunded for some of the money you lost. On average, people that cancel their subscriptions.

1:20:12

Speaker D

With rocket money save $378 a year.

1:20:22

Speaker B

And overall, Rocket Money has saved its.

1:20:25

Speaker D

Members $880 million in cancelled subscriptions descriptions.

1:20:28

Speaker C

Stop wasting money on things you don't use.

1:20:32

Speaker B

Go to rocketmoney.com cancel to get started. That's rocketmoney.com cancel rocketmoney.com cancel.

1:20:34

Speaker C

He's a Latin Grammy winner and a Tejano music icon, currently running for Congress in Texas's 15th district. Welcome to Pod Save America. Bobby Polito, great to see you.

1:20:46

Speaker B

Thank you. In person.

1:20:54

Speaker D

Thank. Yes. In person. Person. Yes. We were. Most people don't know what the hano is. So if you're white.

1:20:56

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:21:03

Speaker D

Or black and not Hispanic, you were like, what is that? Well, yeah, it's kind of like Selena. So I tell everybody it's what Selena did.

1:21:03

Speaker A

I want to hear a lot more about.

1:21:09

Speaker C

About the music piece of this. Because you're. You're in town because you went to the Grammys last night in person in Los Angeles, right?

1:21:11

Speaker D

Correct. I was nominated.

1:21:19

Speaker C

How to go?

1:21:20

Speaker D

I lost.

1:21:21

Speaker B

I'm sorry. It happens.

1:21:22

Speaker C

Is that okay? Is it just. Is it a thrill to be nominated?

1:21:23

Speaker D

I've lost more than I've won and I think most have. I mean, you saw most of these people, you see, you see like Lady Gaga going against Justin Bieber and other titans. Only one wins.

1:21:26

Speaker A

Right, right.

1:21:38

Speaker D

And so, so it's. It's a very hard award to win.

1:21:38

Speaker C

Do the competitive juices flow when you, when you're up there?

1:21:42

Speaker D

You know what? I won two Latin Grammys. Latin Grammys, which is a little. Not the American Grammy. And it's really more pressure when they expect you to win than when you're not expecting to win.

1:21:45

Speaker C

Right, right.

1:21:56

Speaker D

Because like if you're not expected to.

1:21:57

Speaker C

Win, like, who cares?

1:21:59

Speaker D

Who cares? I wasn't supposed to win anyway.

1:22:00

Speaker B

Right.

1:22:02

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:22:02

Speaker D

But if you're supposed to win and you don't.

1:22:02

Speaker C

Yeah, that's true. Yeah. Yeah. There's no expectations. Like you, you don't write a speech, you have a couple too many drinks, then you have a good time when you get up there. And you know, kind of.

1:22:04

Speaker B

It's weird.

1:22:12

Speaker D

See.

1:22:14

Speaker C

Okay.

1:22:14

Speaker D

It's work.

1:22:15

Speaker A

You were.

1:22:15

Speaker C

We were chatting on the way in.

1:22:16

Speaker D

Yeah.

1:22:17

Speaker C

You were telling me that no matter what the event is, it's work. But like. Okay, so I didn't watch last night because I was dealing with a three year old and a one year old.

1:22:17

Speaker B

Okay.

1:22:27

Speaker C

I'm like a sporadic award show watcher. The ones where it's lots of long speeches. Yeah, that seems very boring to me. But the Grammys, it's like a really cool, interesting concert every time.

1:22:28

Speaker D

It was a good show. I liked it. I'M an old school guy, so I like, I like, like the older artists, I don't really know the, the younger artists.

1:22:41

Speaker A

Right.

1:22:49

Speaker D

So I really like see Lady Gaga, I thought she was great. You know, Bruno Mars, I thought that was great. You know, Post Malone singing with, with Slash and like. That's cool.

1:22:49

Speaker A

That is cool.

1:23:01

Speaker D

Yeah, that's. That's cool.

1:23:01

Speaker C

They do a good job, like mixing, matching.

1:23:02

Speaker D

Yeah, Yeah.

1:23:04

Speaker C

I hate that feeling, though, when all of a sudden you don't know what the kids are listening to.

1:23:06

Speaker A

I feel like my brain, the older.

1:23:09

Speaker C

I get is kind of like hardened training. It's like getting new music in there until stick. I guess if you see someone in, in concert, like, that's when you create an experience. I think it creates that, like, memory.

1:23:11

Speaker D

But, you know, there's so much talent, man, they're all talented. There's no slouches there. Everybody's good.

1:23:21

Speaker C

Yeah. And they work their asses off that also too. Yeah, A lot of, A lot of bloody fingertips on the guitar over. Yeah.

1:23:27

Speaker D

Lots of hours of practice and stuff. But people don't realize, like, how, how hard it is to walk and to be in an award ceremony with your wife.

1:23:33

Speaker A

Why is that?

1:23:42

Speaker D

Because she's got to wear high heels. Because that's what they say. That looks good. But she's got to walk like 10,000 miles right. That day.

1:23:42

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:23:49

Speaker D

And she's complaining and she's in pain. I would be. I mean, it's, it's work.

1:23:49

Speaker A

Do you wear boots?

1:23:54

Speaker D

I wear boots and a hat and all leather.

1:23:56

Speaker A

Okay.

1:23:58

Speaker D

Like the S M version of the cowboy, which.

1:23:58

Speaker C

Which that is exactly what we need, I think, to win. Win a congressional seat in Texas. All right, let's talk some politics. So, yeah, a Democrat just won a major special election victory in Texas over the weekend. They flipped a Texas Senate district that Trump won by 17 points in 2024. And I think this was against, like, a much better funded opponent.

1:24:02

Speaker A

Right.

1:24:22

Speaker C

On the Republican side.

1:24:22

Speaker D

Yes. Correct.

1:24:23

Speaker C

What do you think happened in, like, is it irresponsible to read tea leaves and try to divine what this says about 2026?

1:24:24

Speaker D

I think a little bit of both.

1:24:31

Speaker C

Okay.

1:24:32

Speaker D

There is a. It's good news.

1:24:33

Speaker C

Yeah, it really is.

1:24:35

Speaker D

Because, I mean, Trump won my district by 17.9 points.

1:24:36

Speaker C

Oh, interesting.

1:24:40

Speaker A

Wow. Right?

1:24:41

Speaker D

So don't think for a minute I wasn't looking at this and going like, okay, I want to see how this goes.

1:24:41

Speaker C

You're like, here's that 9.

1:24:45

Speaker D

I did not expect him to win by 14 points. I thought he may eek it out. This is a big deal. And then if you look in the Hispanic districts, he overperformed Kamala by 40 to 50 points.

1:24:46

Speaker A

What?

1:25:02

Speaker C

40 to 50?

1:25:03

Speaker D

Yes.

1:25:03

Speaker C

Wow.

1:25:04

Speaker D

Yes. So. So in then the Fort Worth areas. Oh, so. So this is. It was very surprising. I was very shocked and very encouraged. And I'm not surprised, to be honest with you, from what I'm seeing on the ground, even where I am.

1:25:05

Speaker C

Well, so let's talk about that. So you're running. Running for the 15th district. For those who, you know, don't have a map ready in their brain, it's like, it's as far south as you can get in Texas, right on the border.

1:25:21

Speaker D

Yeah.

1:25:32

Speaker C

And then it goes. Shoots up and then kind of east of San Antonio. Is that the new map?

1:25:33

Speaker D

That's correct. Okay, gerrymandered it.

1:25:36

Speaker A

Yeah, we'll.

1:25:38

Speaker C

We'll talk about that.

1:25:38

Speaker D

Right.

1:25:39

Speaker C

So Wikipedia tells me the district is 80 Latino. Is that right?

1:25:39

Speaker D

Yep.

1:25:43

Speaker C

Okay. Thank you, Wikipedia. You got parts of the Rio Grande Valley where Democrats got crushed. Crushed in 24. Right? No, no, you're touching.

1:25:43

Speaker D

There's the. Yeah, there's a caveat.

1:25:54

Speaker C

Right, okay, tell me the caveat.

1:25:55

Speaker D

Well, they. They gerrymandered it to make it seem like South Texas was red. But in our. Our elected representative right now, Monica De La Cruz has never won the Valley.

1:25:57

Speaker C

Okay.

1:26:06

Speaker D

She's never won South Texas. Even with the Trump wave, she lost.

1:26:06

Speaker C

Oh, right.

1:26:10

Speaker A

Okay, Right.

1:26:11

Speaker D

So. So where she did is she picks up the margins up in the north northern and just blows it out like 80, 20. And that gave her the win.

1:26:11

Speaker C

Okay, well, so, but just on the South Texas piece, there was that big swing, right?

1:26:19

Speaker D

There was.

1:26:23

Speaker C

To Trump.

1:26:23

Speaker D

There was a. There was a huge swing.

1:26:24

Speaker A

Why do you think that was? Like, what happened?

1:26:25

Speaker D

I think the candidate didn't resonate with him. And I think. I hate to play into our own stereotypes as Hispanics, but I think since I'm a Hispanic, I'm Latino, I can. I can do it.

1:26:28

Speaker C

Say whatever you want.

1:26:38

Speaker D

If there's. If there's a stereotype that's. That fits us is we're very aspirational people. Right. The reason why a lot of Latinos come to the United States is for a chance to work and actually make it right. I think. I think if you think most about Hispanics are hardworking, very family oriented, and they come from normally from countries that if you work really hard, you get nowhere. Nobody wants to come over here and work really hard and get nowhere. And that's where we are right now. So A lot of people in the Hispanic community were saying, like, we voted for Trump because we thought I could work hard and actually do something. So it's economic, is a big thing. And then you tack on this, the cruelty that's going on right now, the fear with the raids and things like that, that is also affecting the economy, then there's a huge, huge backlash against them.

1:26:39

Speaker C

Yeah, I think you're, you're making an important point too, which is like, I think for someone who's a political obsessive like me, I think of Trump the candidate, but a lot of people still think of the businessman. That's reality show, the millionaire, the billionaire. You want to be rich, right?

1:27:30

Speaker D

Want to be rich? Give me some of that.

1:27:42

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:27:43

Speaker C

When you're doing town halls, like what, what are you hearing about? And then secondarily, like, what's the conversation about border security and immigration policy like today as compared to maybe a year ago?

1:27:44

Speaker D

I think it depends. I've already visited all 11 counties. I'm not even in my primary yet.

1:27:57

Speaker C

So you're working, you're out there.

1:28:01

Speaker D

Been fussing my butt, man. I, I, I, my wife is, is the best person in the world. Because when you retail campaign, it's the most time consuming type of campaigning. You're actually grassroots on the ground, meeting voters. That's what we're doing, taking their questions. And look, it depends because in the Rio Grande Valley, immigration is a big deal because we're in a community where 35 or 40% of the people speak Spanish. And when you see, see that the, that, that the administration is racial profiling also based on language, that's a problem.

1:28:03

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:28:38

Speaker D

In a community with a lot of people speak Spanish and yeah, you know, so it, it affects our businesses. We did, we get a lot of, we, we've always historically depended a lot of tourism from Mexico and right now tourists don't feel welcome. And so they're not coming and spending their money like they should. You know, especially the dollar keeps declining. It's bad, bad. The pesos should be really good. They should be coming in droves.

1:28:39

Speaker C

Right.

1:29:01

Speaker D

And so the economy's not doing well and, and there's going to be a big backlash about it.

1:29:01

Speaker C

Well, the good news is we also pissed off the Canadians, so they're also not visiting.

1:29:06

Speaker D

Not just the G. We pissed off every ally we've ever had.

1:29:10

Speaker C

We're working on pissing off most of NATO.

1:29:13

Speaker A

Right.

1:29:15

Speaker D

The European Union.

1:29:15

Speaker C

Not a lot of flights from Greenland these days, I'm guessing.

1:29:16

Speaker D

No, I don't think so.

1:29:19

Speaker C

Like, yeah, well, I do want to ask you about, like, the economics of these, these, this ice crackdown because, I mean, you know, I'm reading articles about kids who haven't gone to school in a month. That's right. Families who can't go to a job site. I know someone here in LA whose husband was picked up and detained for hours when he was trying to work construction jobs. And then, you know, he, he just like, didn't have his papers on him, but then he didn't go to work that day. Right. And it flipped out everyone around him.

1:29:20

Speaker D

That's right.

1:29:47

Speaker C

So it's like, what are you seeing in terms of the economic influence?

1:29:48

Speaker D

That's a huge deal. I mean, look, the builder community right now is struggling big time. Think about it like this, right? We talked about the aspirational nature, who we are. We're always trying to work. So a lot of these construction owners of these construction companies, this is their first generation where they're actually making money. Because before them, right. They, they were busy trying to do the work.

1:29:51

Speaker A

Right, right.

1:30:13

Speaker D

And. Or their parents were and they wanted them to now get out of that. That. And so now when they're already starting to get there, they don't have a workforce.

1:30:13

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:30:22

Speaker D

And.

1:30:23

Speaker C

And what do you do about that?

1:30:23

Speaker D

I mean, that's the problem. Right.

1:30:24

Speaker A

And.

1:30:26

Speaker D

And they get really angry because people say, just hire American labor. It's like, I'm putting ads out. Nobody wants to work those jobs or they don't know how to work those jobs.

1:30:26

Speaker C

Right.

1:30:35

Speaker D

So what do you do? What? Once business slows and construction slows it, construction is. Houses get more expensive. Expensive. Right. And then realtors get mad because they don't have enough things to sell. And so it's just a domino effect, business wise, which historically the Chamber of Commerce vote tends to lean Republican. And right now they're very angry about this because it hasn't. And us as Democrats, Tommy, haven't been, we haven't been really good salesmen of ourselves on economics. When you go, just look at our economic history, history. Democrats have always been better on the economy.

1:30:35

Speaker A

Right.

1:31:10

Speaker D

Historically, I mean, we've always been better and we just don't sell ourselves that way. And people think, Republicans, oh, successful businessman, and they're better for the economy. And that's just not true.

1:31:11

Speaker C

Yeah, I wonder why that is. It's just sort of a cut. Taxes, you know, equals good business in people's minds. I'm wondering like, sort of where this disconnect comes from.

1:31:22

Speaker D

You know what that equals. Deficits yeah.

1:31:30

Speaker C

That's what.

1:31:32

Speaker D

We're in debt.

1:31:32

Speaker A

Right, Right.

1:31:33

Speaker C

Yeah. Our kids. Kids will be.

1:31:34

Speaker D

That's exactly right. And it's because of Republicans, to be honest with you.

1:31:36

Speaker C

Well, I. Look, I agree with you on the. Joe Biden, he handled inflation, I think, better than a lot of countries did, but it wasn't good enough.

1:31:39

Speaker B

Correct for.

1:31:47

Speaker D

Correct.

1:31:47

Speaker B

Right.

1:31:48

Speaker D

Well, we printed a lot of money.

1:31:48

Speaker B

Yeah.

1:31:50

Speaker C

Yeah, we printed a lot of money. But also, you know, I think immigration was also a big driver of votes against Biden.

1:31:50

Speaker B

Absolutely.

1:31:55

Speaker C

Cycle. And, you know, look, I'm not a. I'm not a fan of Governor Abbott. Is he with my.

1:31:56

Speaker D

My. Me neither.

1:32:00

Speaker C

Texas governor.

1:32:01

Speaker D

We agree.

1:32:02

Speaker C

He seems like not the nicest guy, but I think politically speaking speaking, he did have an enormous impact on the. The national debate about immigration through this sort of sustained busing of individuals. And so, like, early on, I think people probably remember Ron DeSantis flies a bunch of people to Martha's Vineyard. It was so obviously a stunt and so obviously shitty that there was a backlash. But the busing was just relentless. And again, like, treating someone like a political prop or pawn, I think is, like, morally wrong.

1:32:03

Speaker B

Wrong. Agreed.

1:32:33

Speaker C

But there's another piece of this that's like, well, okay, why do just border communities need to shoulder the economic and kind of social burden of having a bunch of people in their communities? I'm just wondering if you could, like, talk about how people you knew felt at the end of the Biden days and how that conversation has changed.

1:32:34

Speaker D

I think what it was is there was a disappointment that for three years, he did. Didn't go there and didn't address the problem. In year four, actually, James Lankford had a deal negotiated. Right. That Trump eventually killed because he wanted to win.

1:32:54

Speaker C

Right.

1:33:12

Speaker D

And so we didn't really do a good enough job educating people on how they themselves also had a hand in this. But it took too long. So you got to understand, in South Texas, there's a lot of Border Patrol agents. Agents, and they vote, and so do their families. And they felt. I mean, I have friends and family in Border Patrol, and they felt that they had been. They didn't sign up for necessarily for processing people, because that's what it was becoming with the asylum. With the asylum seekers. They're like, I signed up to patrol the border, not to be processing people.

1:33:12

Speaker B

Right.

1:33:49

Speaker D

Because that's all they were doing was just processing. And then the people would fly. Fly to wherever they wanted to fly. And that created a lot of resentment. It really did. And. And. And I don't want to ever sound like inhumane about that, because that's people's spirit. They always want to. To look for a better life. That's. That's natural. That's a part of what our ancestors would have done for us, so. But it took four years for him to sign an executive order, which in year four, that immigration slowed down consider miserably because of. He addressed it. Which just took too long.

1:33:49

Speaker C

Yeah, it took way too long. No, but I think you're making an important point, which is, like, I think it's important to. To hear from people like you who, like, live in these communities and. No friends. And just understand how complicated things are. Right. Like, yes, you have a bunch of friends in Border patrol.

1:34:23

Speaker D

I do.

1:34:35

Speaker C

They're good people.

1:34:35

Speaker B

They are.

1:34:36

Speaker C

They're not trying to harm anyone. And also, like, look, we're all horrified by what's happening with ice.

1:34:36

Speaker A

The.

1:34:42

Speaker C

The video of the murder of Alex Preddy by Two Studios. Terrible guys.

1:34:42

Speaker B

Horrifying.

1:34:47

Speaker C

Right?

1:34:47

Speaker D

Horrifying.

1:34:48

Speaker C

And then ProPublica just published their names. It seems like the two men are Latino, and they end up killing a. A white protester, which I think is just the perfect example of, like, the scrambled racial politics of all of this.

1:34:48

Speaker B

Right.

1:35:03

Speaker C

Because these guys are, like, at a organization that is recruiting people with white nationalist imagery run by Stephen Miller, who is an out andout racist. And it's just like, nothing is what you'd expect. And I think we all need to get comfortable with the complexity.

1:35:03

Speaker D

You know, I, I agree, Tommy, but I also don't feel like. I feel like we're putting a lot of emphasis on ICE and not emphasis on this administration. Right. People, like, right now, ICE is the boogeyman. Last night at the Grammys, everybody was out. ICE out and f. Ice and it's. ICE has always existed. Right. And whatever you want to call it, we need a force to get rid of bad actors. Actors in our country that are criminals and bad people. That, that, that you need that. You can't not have that. But I think when we. When we just make a focus about ice, we take off the. The focus on this administration that's actually using them in that. Correct. In that manner.

1:35:17

Speaker B

Right.

1:36:00

Speaker C

The political decisions driving.

1:36:00

Speaker D

That's what. That's the problem. Right. It's when they tell them and they go berate them in the White House and say, get me 3,000 people.

1:36:02

Speaker B

People.

1:36:08

Speaker D

Right now you're forcing them to be overly aggressive to meet quota numbers.

1:36:09

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:36:14

Speaker D

That's very different than saying how they campaigned. We're going to go get out the bad people. That's is not what they're doing.

1:36:14

Speaker C

That's absolutely right.

1:36:20

Speaker D

And, and, and so, so there, those are two separate things where you say, hey, go get out the bad people. Nobody's going to tell you you can't do that. But when you're deporting gardeners and grandmas, right, and then you go in and you, and you're violating constitutional rights, rights, you know, Fourth Amendment, just like crazy. This is not who we are. We can't be that. And we have to call the administration out on it because it's easy. They're going to just go, well, it's ISIS fault. Yeah, that's the boogeyman. No, it's you. Right? It's Stephen Miller. It's Donald Trump. It's the people that are enabling them. That's who has to be called out. And we can't give him a pass.

1:36:20

Speaker C

So it doesn't sound like you're in the kind of abolish ICE camp of the solution to the, this problem.

1:37:03

Speaker D

Look, it's been branded really poorly now. I don't know. It's a bad, it's got, you know, you give love a bad name. You give ICE a bad name. Well, they did, but, but you got to have some type of, of administrative arm to get rid of the bad people that I'm, I'm for that. I don't think anybody's going to disagree with that. Right. Because there are bad people in every, in every walk of life. But the way they're doing, doing it, I, I think that's where it's, where it's bad. And, and I'll tell you, look, last night was a room of, of people in the industry. Right? And artists. We're emotional, man. We put, we pour our heart out in the music.

1:37:07

Speaker B

Right.

1:37:47

Speaker D

And so we are probably more emotional than most, but most Americans especially, and I live, I live in a rural district. People aren't exactly that emotional. They're more. Okay, make, make, let's reason with this. Let, let's find some common sense solutions to this.

1:37:48

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:38:03

Speaker D

And, and, and I, I, I want to caution, you know, because I kind of, I'm, I come from both worlds. I live in a rural area and I, I'm in, in an industry that's very, very much emotional. And, and we kind of have a blend of, of it and say like, yeah, I, I don't think abolishing is, is is the right word. I know that's the, to it because of what we're seeing and it's tragic and I hate it. I hate it as much, believe me, with every fiber of my soul. But we have to be smart on how to point them out and let people know why we got here. And we got here because we were sold a bill of goods and we voted for the wrong person. Not we. I did not vote for that. What I'm saying as a, as a.

1:38:03

Speaker C

Community, as a country.

1:38:45

Speaker D

Yeah, as a country.

1:38:46

Speaker C

No, I agree with you. Look, obviously Trump and Stephen Miller, the drivers of this, I think where I kind of personally live is blaming ICE is almost too simplistic. Like I do, like CBP obviously has been a huge problem here. It needs reforms there. You need reforms of ice. I also think the Department of Homeland Security is a complete total fucking disaster. We created it after 9, 11 in this like climate of fear and we made securitized all these functions that maybe would be better in the Department of Justice or other places. So there's a broader rethinking that needs to happen. But it's probably bigger than just ice. And my view, I agree it is.

1:38:47

Speaker D

I mean you see the Secretary of Homeland Defense, it's, it looks like it's Halloween. Every time she comes out, she got a different outfit. You know, cosplaying is different things. I just don't see like that's not, it's ridiculous.

1:39:20

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:39:32

Speaker D

It's not serious.

1:39:32

Speaker C

It's not a, not a, not a great run organization. Let me ask you about Texas doing this mid decade redistricting. The conversation in Washington is often like, how does this impact the balance of power? Right. The number of seats are Democrats, Republicans. How do human beings in Texas feel about having this forced on them? Do they know? Do they care?

1:39:33

Speaker D

A lot of people don't even know. It's, it's, it's amazing how many people have no idea. I still to this day ask people, people in the Rio Grande Valley tell me, hey, am I in your district now? They know there was a change, but they didn't really know. Like a lot of people didn't know what was going on. I sure as hell did.

1:39:53

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:40:10

Speaker D

When, when I was keeping an eye on it, when they were doing the same this. And, and, and I'll tell you, Tommy, like from my perspective, I, I looked at this and went, they're assuming they're going to win those five seats and they're also assuming that they're going to keep everything that they have. And from my perspective, I'm like, no, you're not. Not if I have something to say about it.

1:40:11

Speaker C

You think this is a mistake? Do you think they, they kind of. There's, like, the dummy mander right where you.

1:40:31

Speaker D

Oh, absolutely. Oh, oh, yeah. Look, I was a political science major in college, and so, So I. The nerd in me comes out sometimes.

1:40:35

Speaker C

Okay, please.

1:40:44

Speaker D

I try to keep it suppressed.

1:40:45

Speaker C

You're in the right place, man.

1:40:46

Speaker D

I try to keep it suppressed. Right. But you look at it and you say, okay, Everybody went on 2024 Trump numbers, which is what they did. But we went on. We went and researched 2022 numbers, which is a Biden midterm which favors Republicans in the opposite party is in power. And there's a candidate named Rochelle Garza from Brownsville, Texas, that ran against Ken Patrick Paxton for attorney general. She lost my district by less than one point. That's not that red.

1:40:47

Speaker C

No, no, That's a little red. Yeah.

1:41:17

Speaker D

Right. Now, I looked at that and I went, oh. So on one hand, I was really mad if they were doing. But if I could be honest, like, from my personal perspective, I went, well, I don't hate it because 65% of the district now. Now is new.

1:41:20

Speaker B

Huh?

1:41:36

Speaker D

To her. To the incumbent. So she doesn't have the name ID in that district, if that makes any sense.

1:41:37

Speaker C

No, it makes total sense.

1:41:45

Speaker D

So. So, like, I'm a South Texas musician. I.

1:41:45

Speaker B

Right.

1:41:49

Speaker D

Our music is very cultural to our people. You know, in our quinceaneras and barbecues. My music and music of my father, too, has been historically present. We've been there forever, whatever. So we've toured those areas. We have friends. We have. We have. We have friends, right?

1:41:49

Speaker B

We.

1:42:07

Speaker D

We know the people. And when I saw this and I went, oh, you're giving me Bville, Texas, a Tejano town. Well, you're. They're looking at it going, well, they voted 75 Republican. And I'm going, yeah, but there are people.

1:42:08

Speaker C

Yeah, they see numbers. You see human beings.

1:42:21

Speaker D

That's exactly right. That's exactly right.

1:42:22

Speaker C

Okay, so your staff, Jeff, how often are they trying to get you to sing at events, play music? How many events turn into concerts, man?

1:42:26

Speaker D

You know what? When we go do a ranch hall, we sing them a couple of songs. Okay. I go take their questions, we feed.

1:42:34

Speaker C

Them, get a guitar in hand.

1:42:42

Speaker B

What do we do?

1:42:45

Speaker D

No, I, I, I take a band.

1:42:45

Speaker B

Okay, the whole band.

1:42:47

Speaker D

Not a whole band. It's kind of like an acoustic set.

1:42:48

Speaker B

Right?

1:42:50

Speaker D

It's an acoustic set. So while they're eating food, they're heating our music. Yeah, not my music, but our type of music. And then I Go speak. I take their questions, I answer all their questions, which I might add, my. The person that we want to take down and, and defeat, Monica De La Cruz, has never done a town hall. She's never answered her constituents questions.

1:42:50

Speaker C

How do you do that? I don't like. You hear that sometimes about members of Congress and it's like, did she just move to D.C. and she never comes back?

1:43:12

Speaker B

How is that possible?

1:43:18

Speaker D

She goes and they hide, hide her and they, and they protect her because they don't want her to expose herself. So they're trying to play her safe. They're hiding her. So what I'm saying is I'm going to be the opposite. I'm going to go everywhere, take some questions and take questions from you. Bring them on.

1:43:18

Speaker C

Play some bangers.

1:43:33

Speaker D

Yeah, play some bangers. We finished. We close with that and everybody's happy.

1:43:34

Speaker C

Do you do covers ever or just your stuff?

1:43:39

Speaker D

Do my stuff.

1:43:41

Speaker A

That's fun.

1:43:42

Speaker D

God, yeah.

1:43:42

Speaker C

Sometimes we get to do live podcasts, guests, and it's really cool. And we've gone out in front of big audiences and it's exciting and I love doing it and I get to be with my friends. But every single time I walk out on the stage, I think to myself, God, I wish I was doing something cooler for the next hour and a half. Like, I had a real talent and I was playing music or I was funny, I was doing a stand up set. No, but you know what?

1:43:44

Speaker D

It's. Perspective is everything, right? It's. I always took my approach to music. It's work. It's a job.

1:44:05

Speaker C

Job. How, how so? I know you mentioned your father was.

1:44:11

Speaker D

My father's a legend.

1:44:15

Speaker C

Legendary musician, just like Hank Williams.

1:44:16

Speaker D

Hank Williams Jr. But.

1:44:18

Speaker C

Yeah, well, so.

1:44:19

Speaker D

But not racist. No, I'm just kidding.

1:44:20

Speaker B

Like.

1:44:21

Speaker D

But you know what I mean, like the cultural thing.

1:44:23

Speaker C

Hey, look, I get it. Yeah. There's a lot of legends in Texas. We got some Willie Nelson, THC drinks in the office right now. So when you're growing up, your father's being as big as he was in, in the business. Did that make you want to. To play music? To what? Make you walk away?

1:44:26

Speaker D

No, I was, I was a Texas Boy Stater in high school. I went to Boy State. That, that's like a whole government. Like, I was a history buff. I loved government. I love politics. And that's why I became a political science major. I got an academic scholarship to go to St. Mary's University in San Antonio. And so I did not want to be a singer that was not in the plans.

1:44:40

Speaker C

My God. So you're walking out on that stage thinking, God, I wish I could do a podcast right now. Now, this is like grass is always.

1:45:01

Speaker D

That was my first love. Like I was, but I was not. Like, once I had success in music, I recorded a song with my dad. That's what did it. Right. So I got two labels. It. It really went really high. And, and it hit, and I had two labels in a bidding war. I ended up negotiating my contract and renegotiating my father's contract. In that same negotiation, I got him 100% raised.

1:45:06

Speaker C

Hell, yeah.

1:45:29

Speaker D

Yeah. And, and so I ended up trying music. I said, dad, I'm going to try it out and see what happens. And that ended up turned into a platinum record. And then I've been at it 30 years.

1:45:29

Speaker C

That's incredible.

1:45:40

Speaker D

And so my music's kind of gone. My life has gone full circle. And I'm like, you know what? I'm tired of what I'm seeing right now. I'm just a guy with an opinion. I want to be somebody with. My opinion matters. And my. I want to be a voice for my people. And yet, yes, I would. It would be taking a huge pay cut from what I'm doing right now, but it's worth it. My, My, my life has to mean more than just music, in my opinion. And, and I haven't seen. I've been really frustrated with the way things have been going with our political discourse, and I, I, I do think that I have a different perspective of, of where I come from. And, and, and I got nothing to lose. I really want to. I really want to represent my people.

1:45:41

Speaker C

That's exciting. Well, so where. If folks want to help out, contribute.

1:46:26

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:46:31

Speaker D

They can go from Bobby Pulido for Texas. My district is 11 counties, and we're not a very. We're very poor, actually. My district's very poor, so we kind of have to go fundraise out of the district. Not my, My ditch. I'm not going to say poor. I misspoke. Broke. My district is broke. And I say that because our, our spirit down there is we don't consider ourselves poor. We consider ourselves broke.

1:46:31

Speaker C

Temporary.

1:46:57

Speaker D

Because tomorrow we're going to make it.

1:46:58

Speaker A

Yep.

1:46:59

Speaker C

Yeah.

1:46:59

Speaker B

Right.

1:47:00

Speaker D

And so we're very aspirational, but we've been, We've been. She has, like, $2 million in her war chest, and I have a primary, and so we need to fundraise aggressively, but I feel very, very confident that we're going to, to win well, and we're going to flip this district.

1:47:00

Speaker C

I think it's exciting. I think it's inspiring when people come from non traditional walks of life and run for office. Like what? Why do we. Not everyone needs to be a lawyer.

1:47:16

Speaker A

You know what I mean?

1:47:25

Speaker C

Like it's great when people from, from the entertainment industry run who have a different kind of cultural connection.

1:47:25

Speaker D

There's not many entertainers though.

1:47:30

Speaker C

Have you seen this guy, Bobby Wine running in Uganda? I have not checked him out. He's like incredible massive music star running against an absolute.

1:47:31

Speaker D

But I'm talking about our country. I know that's like not normal normal.

1:47:38

Speaker C

No it's not.

1:47:41

Speaker D

It's like completely.

1:47:42

Speaker C

Well, because I think people are turned off because people are worried that the minute you jump into politics you're going to polarize half your audience and maybe they won't listen to you anymore and we'll buy records and it scares people.

1:47:43

Speaker A

Yeah.

1:47:54

Speaker C

You don't seem polarizing.

1:47:55

Speaker D

I am not a polarizing guy. But I'll fight. Don't, don't, don't, don't. Don't confuse the niceties for fight.

1:47:56

Speaker B

I'm not.

1:48:02

Speaker C

I haven't gotten to fighting for 20 years so don't worry. Yeah, but didn't end well for me. I had a giant swollen E year and it sucked.

1:48:03

Speaker D

Yeah, I've been, I've had my fair share of bar fights but, but, but I'm a Texas boy.

1:48:09

Speaker B

Right.

1:48:13

Speaker D

Of course you can expect that. But look, I'll fight for, for the people and that's the bottom line. It's this. Is there. Our health care down there is, is, is a mess, man. She voted to cut Medicaid, Medicare, snap, like all the things that our district that ours really depends on. She voted to cut and so, so you have to fight for what's right. Our healthc care system is, is in shambles. I go get my healthcare in Mexico.

1:48:14

Speaker A

Really?

1:48:40

Speaker D

Yes.

1:48:41

Speaker C

Cheaper, easier.

1:48:42

Speaker D

Why listen musicians. All the musician community. We don't work for school districts or other things like that where you can.

1:48:43

Speaker C

Pull it right insur.

1:48:49

Speaker D

Health insurance is through the roof.

1:48:53

Speaker C

It's.

1:48:54

Speaker D

It got more expensive now with these ACA subsidies that expired. So we're on the board border. But how many people that are not on the border are struggling right now? It's just ridiculous. I mean we really have to get in there and the biggest problem we're going to face is corruption because they have their claws in these politicians.

1:48:55

Speaker C

Yes. And good.

1:49:15

Speaker D

And you know somebody has to go there and just call them out for it.

1:49:16

Speaker C

I love it. I love it. Well, the website again is bobbypolitofortexas.com Great to meet you. You, thank you for running. Thanks for coming in. And you know, next Grammys, you're going to win one and then, but also you're going to be a member elected officials.

1:49:21

Speaker D

So no new music, no Grammys, no new music.

1:49:35

Speaker C

What if you get inspired? One day you're sitting in your office and you're like, you write like a songwriting Mike Johnson.

1:49:38

Speaker D

Songwriting is therapy.

1:49:44

Speaker C

It is.

1:49:45

Speaker B

It is.

1:49:46

Speaker D

Yes, it is.

1:49:46

Speaker C

Well, thank you for coming.

1:49:47

Speaker D

Thank you, Tommy. Appreciate it.

1:49:47

Speaker A

That's our show for today. Thanks to Bobby Polito for coming on. Also, quick reminder, some tickets left. Not many, but some tickets left for our upcoming shows in New Zealand and Australia. Wow. Next week, guys.

1:49:53

Speaker D

Next week.

1:50:05

Speaker A

Next week we're gonna be in Australia, New Zealand, we're in Auckland on February 11, Melbourne on February 13, Brisbane on February 14, and Sydney on February 16. Grab your tickets@crooked.com events. Hope to see some of you out there. And in the meantime, Dan and I will be back with the new show on Friday. If you want to listen to Pod Save America ad free and get access to exclusive podcasts, go to cricket.com friends to subscribe on Supercast, Substack, YouTube or Apple Podcasts. Also, please consider leaving us a review that helps boost this episode and everything we do here at Crooked. Pod Save America is a crooked media production. Our producers are David Toledo, Emma Ilick Frank and Saul Rubin. Our associate producer is Farah Safari. Austin Fisher is our senior producer. Reed Churlin is our executive editor. Adrian Hill is our head of news and politics. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Kanter is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Matt de Groat is our head of production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Haley Jones, Ben Hefcoat, Mia Kelman, Carol Pelaviev, David Toles and Ryan Young. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of Amazon, America East.

1:50:05