John Evelyn's 'Fumifugium'

This is an I Heart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. Attention. Welcome to Stuff You Missed in History Class, a production of I Heart Radio. Hello and welcome to the podcast. I'm Tracy V. Wilson and I'm Holly Fry. While I was working on our episode on Ricketts, I stumbled across a reference to a work I had never heard of before, by the way, I was a little bit more focused on the work of the I Heart Podcast. I stumbled across a reference to a work I had never heard of before, by someone I do know about, but in a different context. And that was Fumafugium. We're just, that's how we're going to say it. Fumafugium. Who knows how he wanted it to be pronounced. That was written by John Evelyn in 1661. And I knew of John Evelyn mostly as a diarist. He comes up a lot alongside his contemporary and fellow diarist Samuel Peeps. We've covered Samuel Peeps on the show before. Fumafugium was a treatise on air pollution. And it was mentioned in the Ricketts research because of the possible role of air pollution in an apparent rise in Ricketts in the 17th century. In that moment, I kind of thought, wow, John Evelyn wrote a treatise on air pollution. I've had no idea fascinating. And then I just mentally moved on. Back to my work. But the day that I finished the Ricketts outline, news broke that in the US, the environmental protection agency is going to stop factoring the economic cost of harm to human health into decisions about air pollution regulations. A spokesperson from the agency said that they are still considering health impacts, but that there won't be a monetary estimate because those numbers are too uncertain. Okay, but like you can't really include the impact on human health in a cost benefit analysis. If you're not estimating the cost. So this administration has been pretty straightforwardly hostile to things like conservation and green energy. So when I heard that I immediately went back to Fumafugium and the fact that people have been talking about the harms of air pollution for hundreds of years. So we're going to start this episode by looking at John Evelyn's biography. He was born in Surrey on October 31, 1620. His surviving child born to Richard and Eleanor Comer Evelyn. The Evelyn family held the patent on the manufacturer of gun powder, which traced back to John's great grandfather, who had brought the manufacturer of gun powder to England. The family lived at Woodenhouse, which was on a 700 acre estate. This is a hotel conference center and wedding venue today to give you a sense of the scale. Richard had an income of about 4,000 pounds a year. In other words, this was a wealthy family. Although since he was the second son, John was not expected to inherit much of this. When he was about five, John was sent to be raised by his maternal grandparents. From a very young age, he liked to draw and to sketch and he started keeping a diary at the age of 11. He may have started this diary by writing his notes in an Almanac. He reformatted his entries later on. And at first, he included both personal reflections and historic and newsworthy events. But eventually his diary would focus almost entirely on the latter. John's sister Elizabeth died in 1634 at the age of about 20. And then his mother died a year later of what he described as excessive remorse over the deaths of Elizabeth and of other siblings who had died when they were babies. John was only 15 when his mother died. In 1637, John and two brothers went to the middle temple, one of the four ends of court of England and Wales where people went to study law and be called to the bar. This was really more about social connections than law study though. That same year, he was admitted to Bayley, O'College Oxford. He left this college without finishing a degree. That was not uncommon for men of his station in the 17th century. He also didn't feel like he was prepared for college though, both because he did not think his earlier education at a free school had been very good. And because he had not really applied himself to it. In 1640, when John was 20, his father died and at that point his older brother inherited Wootenhouse. The following year, Evelyn traveled to the continent, touring Holland and Belgium and very briefly volunteering for military service before returning to England. After years of conflict between King Charles I and Parliament, a civil war started in 1642 with royalists fighting against parliamentarians. And this put Evelyn in a difficult position. He was unquestionably a royalist, but Wootenhouse was in territory controlled by the parliamentarians. Evelyn decided to return to the continent rather than becoming involved in the war on the royalists side that would have risked the confiscation of the family estate by the parliamentarians. Evelyn spent about four years on a grand tour of France and Italy, traveling and learning about art and architecture. Then in 1647, he married Mary Brown, whose father was Charles I's ambassador to Paris. Although Mary was English, she had spent almost all of her life in France. Her exact birth year is unclear, but she was still in her early to mid teens and Evelyn was 26. They do not seem to have lived together until about three years after the wedding, though. She is described as Evelyn's intellectual equal and as being very kind and sweet. She also put a lot more effort and care into the education of their children than John had experienced himself. King Charles I was executed in 1649, and his son Charles II fled to France in 1651. That effectively ended the civil war. Oliver Cromwell became Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland. John Evelyn's loyalties were not changed at this point and his wife's family were also royalists, but now that the war was over, he thought it was time to return to England. He and Mary traveled separately and both of them arrived in 1652. Evelyn never left England after this. John and Mary lived at Seis Court, Deppford, which had been occupied by Mary's family for generations. Although since it had been confiscated by the parliamentarians, Evelyn had to do a lot of work to secure the lease to it. The first of their eight children was born in 1652, although only four of those children lived to adulthood and only one of them outlived John and Mary. The 1650s were difficult for Evelyn. He was a royalist and publishing royalist tracks and England no longer had a monarch. The loss of three of his children over the course of just a few years was also devastating for the whole family. Also, while John and Mary both had affluent upringings, their life together was not a much smaller budget since John was the second son and had not inherited most of the family's wealth. They were not poor by any means. This was more like they had to be really selective about which luxuries they could afford. Evelyn put some of his efforts into starting a garden at Seis Court, one that he aspired to turn into a paradise on earth. This sparked a greater interest in botany and garden design and he would eventually go on to design gardens for his friends. He also did a lot of writing, including scientific writing. He translated the first book of Lucretius' Didactic Poem, D.R.R.M. Natura, into English first with a commentary in 1656. This book, which is composed as a hymn, lays out the basics of the universe as composed of atoms. Evelyn was connected to a lot of the people who had established the Royal Society and he became a member of that society once it was established in 1661. That's also the year he wrote Fumafoojim, which we'll be talking more about in a bit. Evelyn wrote about 30 books over the course of his life and several of them were focused on conservation and the natural world. Sometimes he's described as England's first environmentalist. Silva, or a discourse of forestries and the propagation of timber in his majesty's dominions, was published in 1664, and it's one of the earliest published works on tree conservation and forestry. Soil, a philosophical discourse of earth relating to the culture and improvement of it for vegetation and the propagation of plants, came out in 1676. Later editions of that book use the title Tara, rather than Soil. Other works, served the course of Evelyn's life, included a book on etching and engraving called Sculptura, a book on metals called Numus Mata, and Acetaria, a discourse on salads. That is, of course, about salads. He also wrote a biography of Margaret Gadolfen, who was a maid of honor at court. Of course, after the monarchy had been reestablished, Evelyn's relationship with her has been framed as paternal and mentoring, but also as kind of an emotionally very intense friendship bordering on an affair, possibly manipulative on Evelyn's part. Margaret secretly married Sydney Gadolfen in 1676 and died in childbirth two years later, and it's after that that Evelyn wrote this biography. Although Evelyn did not really care for court or public life, after the restoration of Charles II in 1660, he did serve on a series of commissions and councils, which continued during the reign of James VII and II. These included the commission to rebuild London after the great fire of 1666 and the Council of Foreign Plantations, which governed England slave plantations in the colonies. King James also named Evelyn one of the commissioners of the privy seal. Evelyn also served on the commission for sick and wounded mariners and prisoners of war during the Dutch wars of the 1660s and 70s. Probably when he became friends with Samuel peeps, Samuel peeps was working with the Navy at that point in our episode about Samuel peeps, which will run as a Saturday classic soon. We said that peeps just found everything in the world around him really interesting and worth knowing about. And this was really true of Evelyn as well. In 1691, Evelyn inherited wooden house after the death of his older brothers last surviving son. He moved there with his wife in 1694. Evelyn died in London on February 3rd, 1706 at the age of 85. Most of Evelyn's works were published posthumously, including his diary, which was published for the first time in 1818. He also left behind a ton of correspondence in addition to his more formal books and writings. An archive of his personal papers is in the British Library today, although much of his personal library, which numbered more than 3000 volumes, was broken up and sold at auction in the 1970s. Let's take a quick sponsor break and then we will talk about Fumafugium. To set the stage for our discussion of John Evelyn's Fumafugium, we need to talk about coal. Historically, people in Britain have burned a range of materials for heat and fuel, including peat, dried, dung, wood, and charcoal, which is made with wood and other organic materials. In London, in particular, the main sources of fuel for centuries were wood and charcoal, which most people just called coal. Generally speaking, people did not find wood smoke to be all that unpleasant and charcoal didn't produce a lot of smoke when it burned. The Romans mined and used betuminous coal in Britain, but after the end of the Roman Empire, most coal mining there stopped. Then around the 12th century, people started extracting coal from a long-nirivered time in Newcastle, and from cliffs around the coast of Northumberland and South Wales. It's possible that this coastal location is the source of the term sea coal, although there's also speculation that it's a reference to coal that was washed ashore or exposed by erosion, or that the name came from the coal being transported by sea. Whatever it may be, the term sea coal differentiated betuminous coal from charcoal. Generally speaking, coal produces more heavier smoke than wood or charcoal, and the coal that was being burned at this time also probably contained a lot more sulfur than what's in use today. That made its smoke even more unpleasant. Even so, some industries started adopting coal as a fuel source in the 13th century, especially brewers and metal smiths, and some people also started using coal to heat their homes. One reason for this was that centuries of wood and charcoal use as fuel had led to deforestation, so wood was becoming harder to get and more expensive. Blacksmiths also used bellows to make their fires hotter, and coal did not spark as much as other fuels did when they did this. Since the smoke from wood and charcoal had not been perceived as all that noxious, people hadn't built many tall chimneys to try to carry it farther away from the ground before it was released into the air. That compounded air quality problems when people started burning more coal. There's still a lot more coal smoke a lot closer to the ground than there would have been had it been sent up a chimney first. In the 13th century, Parliament started making various efforts to regulate the industrial use of coal, especially from brewers. Edward I prohibited the burning of sea coal in 1306. People kept burning coal in spite of that ban, though. The burning of coal in Britain declined over the latter half of the 14th century, but that wasn't because of objections to the smoke. It was because so many people died during the Black Death. The dramatic drop in population and corresponding drop in demand for fuel also meant that over the next decades, Britain's forests started to regrow. But then during the 15th and 16th centuries, a combination of factors led to more widespread coal use. Another was another wave of deforestation as Britain's population and fuel use started growing again. Another is the little ice age and the need to burn more fuel to stay warm because it was colder and wetter. And a third is that a lot of England's roads connecting the forests to city like London were in really terrible condition and that was only getting worse over time. Moving wood into the cities was increasingly difficult and expensive. England's towns and cities, especially London, became progressively dirtier and more polluted, leading Parliament and a series of monarchs to once again attempt to regulate the burning of coal. For the most part, this was not about the idea of public health or coal smoke being bad for people in general. It was about the health of the monarch and their family and what the monarch found unpleasant or distasteful. For example, under Queen Elizabeth I in 1578, the burning of coal was banned in London, but only when Parliament was in session. Then in 1603 James the sixth of Scotland was crowned as James the first of England and Ireland. Coal was more widely used in Scotland and its acceptance by the crown and use in the royal household helped pave the way for its use elsewhere in England. More industry started using coal as fuel. At the same time, brewers in particular were still seen as polluting the air without their coal smoke and there were ongoing efforts to either regulate brewers use of coal or to move the breweries out of London in the first part of the 17th century. Soon London was burning more coal than probably any other city in Europe and that brings us to John Evelyn's Fumafugia written in 1661. Evelyn started on this very shortly after the restoration of Charles II in 1660. As we've already said, Evelyn didn't really like court or public life. He much preferred to work in his garden and read and write about things that interested him. I feel you Evelyn, but he also had high hopes for what life would be like now that England had a king again. Evelyn thought he might be able to encourage the king to pursue things that would improve England as a nation. Evelyn also hoped this would help him secure some kind of royal appointment, one that would let him do good work and be paid for it. And he hoped to find a place at court for his wife. It's a little unclear how much Mary may have wanted this for herself, but she had grown up in France and much more affluent circumstances than what she had in England. She definitely did have friends among the English nobility and the elite. Fumafugia, which the King commissioned, was connected to all of this. Evelyn hoped to both impress the king and encourage him to do something about the problem of coal smoke in London. And he thought that if the King put these recommendations into action, the results would reflect well on the monarch and elevate him in the eyes of his subjects. The issue of air pollution was also a natural fit for this given Charles the seconds focus on beauty and decorum at his court. An article by Mark Jenner of the University of York argues that Fumafugia was also written partly as a political allegory on one level. It was definitely about the issue of air pollution and cold smoke like. John Evelyn thought it was a way to maybe help the problem get taken care of while also making the King look really good by taking care of that problem. But Evelyn might also have meant it at least somewhat symbolically with the removal of all the coal pollution in London serving as a stand in for the removal of corruption and unwanted politics from the British government. Of course, people had been writing about smoke, bad smells, air pollution and the industrial burning of coal for centuries. But Fumafugia is seen as the first serious work devoted to air pollution. It's only about 24 pages long and its full title is Fumafugia or the inconvenience of the air and smoke of London dissipated together with some remedies humbly proposed by J.E. Esquire to his sacred majesty and to the Parliament now assemble. Its title page includes a Latin epigraph from Lucretius's Dereurumnatura which translates approximately as how easily the heavy smoke of coal seeps into the brain. This pamphlet starts with a letter addressed to the King. Evelyn describes walking in the palace at Whitehall and seeing smoke coming from tunnels near Northumberland House. He says this smoke had invaded the court, quote, that all the rooms, galleries and places about it were filled and infested with it. And that to such a degree as men could hardly discern one another for the cloud and none could support without manifest inconveniency. He describes this cloud as a threat to the King's health and goes on to say, quote, your majesty who is a lover of noble buildings, gardens, pictures and all royal magnificences must needs desire to be freed from this prodigious annoyance and which is so great in enemy to their lustre and beauty that where at once enters there can nothing remain long in its native splendor and perfection. He says the King's sister Henrietta Ann Duchess of Orleans had also complained of the effects of the smoke in her breast and her lungs. Having established the effects of the smoke on the King and his family Evelyn goes on to say, quote, evil is so epidemical in danger as well the health of your subjects as it sellies the glory of this your imperial seat. Next was a note to the reader in which Evelyn says he has been, quote, frequently displeased at the small advance and improvement of public works in this nation, wherein it seems to be much inferior to the countries and kingdoms which are round about it, especially during these late years of our sad confusions. But now that God has miraculously restored to us our prince, a prince is so magnanimous and public a spirit we may promise ourselves not only a recovery of our former splendor, but also whatever any of our neighbors enjoy of more universal benefit for health or ornament. In some, whatever may do honor to a nation so perfectly capable of all advantages. The text itself starts by discussing the importance of air, noting that philosophers had named the air as the window to the soul. He walks through what he sees as some of the finest qualities of London like its position on good ground with good soil with the river tams allowing goods to be brought in from the sea and the land. And when untainted by smoke a sweet and wholesome air. He describes the culinary fires kept in people's homes as not responsible for the problems of cold smoke, but instead blames them on the industrial fires of, quote, brewers, diars, line burners, salt and soap boilers and some other private trades. He goes on to say quote, while these are belching it for their city jaws, the city of London resembles the face rather of Mount Etna, the court of Vulcan, stromboli or the suburbs of hell than an assembly of rational creatures and the imperial feet of our incomparable monarch. Later he writes quote, it is this horrid smoke which obscures our churches and makes our palaces look old, which fouls our clothes and corrupts the waters. So as the very rain and refreshing do's which fall in the several seasons precipitate this impure vapor, which with its black and tenacious quality spots and contaminates whatsoever is exposed to it. He goes on to describe the evils of this smoke like yellowing pictures and hangings, ruining clothes that are left out to dry, killing bees and flowers and gardens and making fruit taste bitter when fruit can grow at all. And it's effects on the body, the lungs and larynx and throat and voice. He cites an expert physician as saying cold smoke causes consumption, thysus and in disposition of the lungs, consumption and thysus both mean tuberculosis, which is caused by bacteria, something that was not known at the time, but tuberculosis and the other lung conditions like asthma are definitely affected by air pollution. The second part of this pamphlet offers remedies for these issues and we will get to that after a sponsor break. Stop paying to invest. With free trade you can invest without the legacy fees, with a free isre, a free pension and commission free investing in funds, stocks, ETFs, bonds and more. Join over 1.6 million users on free trades award-winning free platform. Go to freetrade.io slash radio to get started. Capital at risk, Icer and Sip rules apply, other charges may apply. The second part of John E. Lund's homophagium offers solutions for London's smoke problems. He notes that there are not many materials that quote, burn clear and that supplying the entire city of London with wood is just not possible. He does argue that it is possible for London to be supplied with a lot more wood and at better prices by more actively planting forests and then harvesting the wood after those trees mature and then continuing those plantings to keep the cycle going. This has some overlap with what he would later write in his book, Silva which we mentioned earlier. Among other things, Silva recommends a prohibition on the cutting of trees more than quote, one foot square within 22 miles of London and encourages the intentional planting of seedlings on a state. This was both to beautify the country and provide the benefits of trees and shade and to ensure that there was an ongoing supply of wood for burning fuel and other uses. Fumophagium also recommends the removal of trades that were the biggest nuisances to the air of the city like the brewers and the soap boilers and all those other ones that he lifted off. He proposes that they be moved five or six miles away below the tins so the smoke will not be an issue for the residents of London. While this definitely would have improved air quality in London, he does not really engage with what it would mean for the people already living in the areas that these industries would theoretically be moved to. He does, however, speculate that cold air rising from the surrounding marshes and fens would mix with the smoke and render it less noxious. Also, just as a note, the areas he was talking about are all considered parts of London today. Yeah, it's like he sort of makes it sound like he's going to send them away far, far into the country, but that it is all of it is really London now. Now those are just neighborhoods. Yeah, yeah. From there, Evelyn argues that this move would provide jobs since water men would be needed to move all those goods that were made by all those industries back into London. And he says that it would help protect London from fire. Something that seems almost prophetic given the devastation of the great fire of London, which took place five years after he wrote this. He notes that laws could be passed to accomplish this and that there had been such laws previously. He quotes the full text of one that was passed during the reign of King James I and VI. He also touches on other steps that could make the air of London more wholesome beyond the issue of cold smoke. This includes prohibiting burials within the city. Over the course of his life, Evelyn also wrote other work that advocated for the establishment of garden cemeteries to act as both burial places for the dead and as beautifying public green space. In this work, Evelyn also advocates for moving some of the stinkier occupations out of the city, although not as far away as what he proposed for the coal burners. That included people like butchers, fishmongers and candle makers who were making their candles primarily from beef tallow. In Fumafoojium's third section, Evelyn calls for all the low grounds around London to be planted in fields of 20, 30 or 40 acres or more. These would be separated and enclosed by fences or palisades and planted quote not much unlike to what his majesty has already begun by the wall from Old Spring Garden to St. James's in that park. They would be elegantly arranged and diligently kept and supplied with quote such shrubs as yield the most fragrant and odoriferous flowers and are apt to tinge the air upon every gentle emission at a great distance. We already talked about how he loved gardening and botany and messes where he used that knowledge to list off a number of possible plants. They included sweet briar white and yellow jasmine, bay, juniper, lavender, rosemary and hops. And then in the spaces between those fences and palisades, he recommends planting beds of flowers, including carnations, violets and cow slips, lilies, narcissists and strawberries. He thought that if fields like this were planted all around London, then the wind would perpetually be bringing good smells into the city. And then in the wintertime branches and blossoms that had been pruned or picked from the plants could be burned for their fragrance. These horticultural improvements may have been inspired by Evelyn's friend, John Beale, who had made some similar proposals a few years before. Beale had written a series of letters about these ideas to Samuel Hartleb, who was also a member of the Royal Society, and Hartleb had passed those on to Evelyn. Fubafu-Giam ends quote, and this is what I, in short, had to offer for the improvement and mediation of the air about London, and with which I shall conclude this discourse. Evelyn delivered this proposal to the king, and at first it seemed like Charles might have some interest in pursuing it. For a couple of days he discussed it at various meals and events, but none of Evelyn's proposals were ultimately adopted. And while he was appointed to various commissions, this did not lead to the kind of work that Evelyn had hoped to be doing, or the kind of income he hoped to earn from it. In particular, his role on the commission for sick and wounded mariners and prisoners of war was really hard work, and it was personally expensive, and it involved his being exposed to illnesses, including the plague. However, Fubafu-Giam went on to have a life of its own that extended beyond Evelyn's lifetime. It was reprinted several times during the 18th century in response to rising rates of pollution and efforts to mitigate it. One of those reprintings was in 1772 by Samuel Pegg the Younger, and his preface, Pegg wrote, quote, Fubafu-Giam has been reprinted at other points in the years since then. For example, in 1930 during debates over a potential new power station being built in Chelsea, the Royal Society reprinted it, quote, In accordance with the general desire reported in the Thames for November 29, 1929, when an extension of power stations emitting presumptuous smoke in London was under discussion. In 1961, it was reprinted by the National Society for Clean Air. Yeah, obviously the air of London is much cleaner than it was in the 17th century, but it continued to be really like very polluted for a long time. We have episodes about some of the more modern events that were tied to the levels of air pollution, like the Great London smog is, I think, the most memorable one. The atmospheric conditions led to a low lying fog and smog layer that people literally could not see through. Yuck. No thanks. Do you have a listener mail that is hopefully not so coated with smog? You can't see it. I do have listener mail. It's from Caitlin. Caitlin sends us the greatest emails. Caitlin wrote Dear Tracy and Holly I've written in many times over the years with anecdotes, connections or further details on various episodes and the disability stories always resonate deeply. I'm working on my PhD with a very historical focus on some aspects of disability studies. So most of this episode was familiar ground. That episode was the one that was about the 504 sit-ins for a couple of weeks ago. But I cannot imagine the reach of this podcast when I lecture my 60 students on 504 ADA and other milestones in the American disability rights movement each semester, it stays pretty local to those students. Thank you for bringing this topic to more people who might not have had the chance to learn about this in school. I thought some etymology might be interesting for y'all. Why do we say disabled and when did we stop saying handicapped? The short answer is disabled people asked us to, but the long answer has more nuance. Handicap was actually a self identifier used by disabled people as an alternative to crippled, which had and has pejorative connotations of pity and shame attached. Handicap comes from sports where hand and cap style bets would be used to try to compensate for horses or athletes having different skill levels. The betters would each offer a wager of what they thought the particular advantage should be. So better one, think CBesket should start three links ahead of Commodore and better two, think CBesket should start one link ahead. A neutral arbiter would decide which of those offers was most fair and the parties could either agree and make a bet or take their hand out of the cap. This process quickly became metaphorical rather than using an actual cap. So for a person seeking another way to describe their position in the world, the idea of a handicap which acknowledged and tried to account for a disadvantaged starting line was far superior to that of being crippled. Randolph born who would be an excellent future episode was one of the first to use the term in writing in 1911 in his essay, a philosophy of handicap and also published the handicap to buy one of them. It was the preferred self identifier for other groups as well, including the league of the physically handicap to lobbied for equal employment assistance under the new deal. In roughly the generation of Judy human, Kitty Kohn and Brad Lomax disabled people began to express frustration and disdain for handicap. The reason why varied from person to person, but one notion was that it reinforced the idea that disability could be negated or rehabilitated rather than disability being an important and permanent part of a person's identity. This got longer than I meant to cons of writing about a topic I just finished prediscitation work on thank you again for your consistent dedication to showcasing the history of every kind of person and every kind of place and every kind of time. Just changed the way I think about the world best Caitlin. PS here are some pictures of my two cats, Sharky, Torte and Dimitri Orange enjoying the sunbeams that later living in each afternoon. These cats are always so precious. We have three cat pictures all featuring sunbeams. So good. So I love Caitlin's emails. They send us great emails. Many of them on these topics. I wanted to read this one in particular because I noticed that language shift in the 504 research. I noticed that there were people in that disabled activists specifically in the 504 episode who were using the term handicap to describe themselves. And that also there were people using the word disabled and disabled seem to be slightly more common in the research in terms of like the first person quotes. It was a little bit surprising to me. Mostly because I am a little bit younger and like Judy human and Brad Lomax and Kitty Kohn. But my mom worked with disabled people for a lot of her career. And I was seeing the term handicapped in a lot of what she was doing. You know, a couple of decades after the 504 sit-ins took place. I was a little bit surprised at how early the word disabled and disability was in like the common use of the people who were actually disability activists at that time. I also think this is such a good email in terms of how language works for a lot of groups and there are a lot of self advocacy. And we have talked about that before in other contexts like the civil rights movement and whether the preferred term has been black or before that African American or before that Negro. And a lot of those have been self identifiers that people adopted because it felt better and more reflective of their self and goals and earlier terminology. But then eventually for various reasons, a different word becomes the preferred word and that is normal. And then someone needs to have a panic about it. Right. And act like it is the biggest burden in the world to update your language use. Yeah. Because someone has asked you to. I'm super glad this came up because I don't know if you caught it. I caught it and like my brain didn't register it and then like a week later my brain went, hey, that thing you were thinking this is what happened. Well, we did behind the scenes. I referred to a parking space as a handicap parking space and I. All right, occurred to me later and I was like, I hope nobody thought I was being a jerk there. But that's one of those things that you and I grew up with them being always called that and like it's almost hardwired. Saying that on the sign. Yeah. So my brain just took like 10 days to do the math on it and be like, you got to. Right. Yeah. And today that would more often be like the accessible parking spot. Yeah. The accessible bathroom. Yeah. Did not even register to me. So not intentionally thoughtless but thoughtless just the same. Yeah. So thank you again, Caitlin. You sent us so many great emails. I genuinely love them every time I get one. I would like to send us a note about this or any other podcast where history podcasts that I heart radio. And you can subscribe to the show on the I heart radio app or anywhere else you like to get your podcasts. Stuff you missed in history class is a production of I heart radio. For more podcasts from I heart radio, visit the I heart radio app Apple podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. This is an I heart podcast guaranteed human.