Dell PCs with Intel inside are built for the moments you plan, and the ones you don't. For the time you forgot your charger at the gate. Passengers, we are now on our initial ascent. Or when you're bouncing between projects like a ping-pong ball. We build PCs with long-lasting battery life so you're not scrambling for a charger. And built in intelligence so you can stay focused on whatever you're doing. Dell Technologies, built for you. Dell.co.uk forward slash Dell PCs. With Fynn we've built the number one AI agent for customer service. It solves up to 90% of queries for businesses, tops all the performance benchmarks on the G2 leaderboard, and it comes with a million dollar guarantee. Check it out at fynn.ai. But Paul Ehrlich, the author of the blockbuster book The Population Bomb, was charismatic, telegenic, and absolutely terrifying. Joined by his wife Anne, he told Carson's massive audience that hundreds of millions of people were about to starve to death, and that nothing could stop it. Ehrlich's first appearance on The Tonight Show demonstrates a lot of things, not least how much popular TV has changed. I'm struggling to imagine Carson's eventual successor Jimmy Fallon giving an hour to say, CRISPR inventor Jennifer Doudna, but alone without a lip-sync battle. But it also shows just how influential Ehrlich was. Ehrlich appeared on The Tonight Show more than 20 times. The Population Bomb sold over 2 million copies and became one of the most popular science books of the 20th century. His words help popularize a broader, population-panic world view that influenced policymakers in the US and abroad, including coercive family planning policies in countries such as India and China. Ehrlich and his book fundamentally changed the world we live in today. And yet Ehrlich, who died recently at 93, turned out to be spectacularly wrong, wrong in ways that have had major consequences for humanity. But I want to dwell on something. It's precisely because he was both so wrong and so influential that doom-saying remains so seductive and so dangerous. The Population Bomb, I suspect, was one of those of the moment books that was more owned than read. But you didn't need to get far into it to grasp Ehrlich's alarmist message. You just needed to read the opening lines. Quote, The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s, hundreds of millions of people will starve to death, in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. And the book was just part of his lifelong campaign. Ehrlich predicted that 65 million Americans would die of famine between 1980 and 1989. He told a British audience that by the year 2000, the United Kingdom would be, quote, a small group of impoverished islands inhabited by some 70 million hungry people. He said India, which is home to nearly 600 million people in 1970, could never feed 200 million more people. He said U.S. life expectancy would drop to 42 by 1980. On Earth Day 1970, he declared that, quote, in 10 years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Every one of these predictions was almost 180 degrees in the wrong direction. In America, as in much of the world, obesity became the true metabolic health crisis, not starvation. The UK, at least the last time I checked, still exists. India is now a major agricultural exporter, as population has nearly tripled, while hunger has fallen. Marine life is stressed, but very much not extinct. The bottom line is that instead of mass starvation, the world experienced the greatest expansion of food production in human history. Per capita calorie supply has risen consistently since 1961. Since the population bomb was published, rates of hunger have dropped dramatically. So what did Aerlik miss? For one thing, he made a common mistake. He assumed line goes up. The years leading up to the population bomb's publication in 1968 featured the steepest population increases in global history. The trends were so on the nose for his thesis that you could almost forgive Aerlik for assuming they would inevitably continue. But if Aerlik looked closer at the data, it would have revealed that even in the high growth 1960s, the world was already bending toward our comparatively low fertility present. Europe, Japan, and North America were all seeing their fertility rates fall as societies urbanized, women were educated, and child mortality dropped. Plus, the population bomb was published in 1968, which was eight years after the birth control pill was introduced. Aerlik, and many others of his time, to be fair, appeared to assume that these patterns wouldn't apply as the countries of the global south developed. But they did. As these social and economic trends spread around the world, fertility kept falling from around five children per woman globally when the population bomb was published to 2.3 today. But the bigger mistake wasn't misreading data. It was failing to account for people, people like Norman Borlaug. Borlaug was an agronomist from rural Iowa, who with the support of the Rockefeller Foundation, developed high-yielding dwarf wheat varieties that transformed agriculture in countries like Mexico, India, and Pakistan. India, which Aerlik had written off in racially-tinged ways, didn't just avoid famine, it became self-sufficient in food production. The population bomb was explicit about Aerlik's worldview. Population growth was the, quote, cancer. That quote must be cut out. We saw people, or at least people in the global south, as little more than mouths to feed. Each fighting for shares a static pie. And they dismissed the part the global south could play in finding solutions. Borlaug and the Green Revolution researchers, by contrast, saw them as minds to solve problems, including figuring out ways to make that pie bigger. Aerlik's fundamentally zero-sum worldview may have gotten him global recognition, and sadly, remains far too prevalent, but it blinded him to the future. And that's why he ended up on the losing end of one of the most famous wagers in academic history. We'll be back after a short break. We build PCs with long-lasting battery life so you're not scrambling for a charger. And built-in intelligence so you can stay focused on whatever you're doing. Dell Technologies. Built for you. Dell.co.uk forward slash Dell PCs. How many third-party vendors does your company use? 20? 200? Thanks to AI, someone on your team probably added three more this week. And your security lead has no idea. Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up. Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor, automatically, so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it. AI on, risk off. Vanta.com slash TPRM. How many third-party vendors does your company use? 20? 200? Thanks to AI, someone on your team probably added three more this week. And your security lead has no idea. Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up. Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor, automatically, so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it. AI on, risk off. Vanta.com slash TPRM. The end is coming! Did I miss it? Julian Simon, an economist at the University of Maryland, believed the opposite of everything Airlik believed. Simon's argument was simple. People are the world's most valuable resource. Human ingenuity responds to scarcity by finding new supplies, substitutes, and efficiencies. And that meant the commodity prices, adjusted for inflation, would fall over time, not rise. In 1980, Simon challenged Airlik to a bet, pick any raw materials, any time period longer than a year, and wager on whether prices would go up or down. Airlik and two colleagues chose five metals, chromium, copper, nickel, tin, and tungsten, and bought 1,000 worth of them on paper. The bet would be settled in 1990. During those ten years, the world's population grew by more than 800 million, the largest one-decade increase in human history. Airlik was wrong. Again, all five metals fell in inflation-adjusted price. In October 1990, Airlik acknowledged Simon's win with a check for $576.07. What Airlik didn't do was revise his views to reflect the facts, which is what makes him more than a cautionary tale about bad predictions. In 2009, he told an interviewer the population bomb was, quote, way too optimistic. In 2015, he said his language, quote, would be even more apocalyptic today. On 60 Minutes in 2023, at age 90, he told correspondent Scott Pelley that, quote, the next few decades will be the end of the kind of civilization we're used to. It didn't matter that the world had spent 55 years proving him wrong. Airlik didn't blink. And Airlik's wrongness had real consequences. He endorsed cutting off food aid to countries he considered hopeless, including India and Egypt. The broader population panic movement he helped create influenced coercive real-world policies. India's forced sterilization campaigns during the 1970s, China's one-child policy, and sterilization programs across the developing world. So why did the world listen to him for so long? Partly because we're wired to. Humans process negative information more readily than positive. An evolutionary hangover that makes doom sayers inherently more compelling than optimists. At a research on expert prediction, found that, quote, hedgehog thinkers, people who, like Airlik, see everything through the lens of one big idea and fight like hell to hold on to it, are simultaneously the worst forecasters but get the most media attention. They're more confident, more quotable, more dramatic. The hedgehog gets Carson. The fox gets ignored. There's also a structural incentive problem. Predict things will be fine, and you're wrong, you're irresponsible. Predict disaster, and you're right, you're a genius. Predict disaster, and you're wrong, people forget, or just assume you were a little early. It was notable to me, the sub-headline of the New York Times obituary of Airlik called his predictions not wrong, but, quote, premature. None of this means we should ignore environmental problems. Climate change is real, and Airlik was relatively early in flagging it. Biodiversity loss, which is closer to his actual academic expertise, remains legitimately alarming. And we shouldn't repeat Airlik's mistakes in the opposite direction. Just because things have been getting better does not automatically mean that trend will continue, especially if we make perverse and self-defeating policy choices. But the real lesson of Airlik's life is that assuming doom leads to worse policy than assuming agency. Right off a country is hopeless, and you justify cutting its food aid, assume people are the problem, and you end up sterilizing them against their will. Julian Simon died in 1998, never approaching Airlik's level of public fame. His signature line, quote, the ultimate resource is people, skilled, spirited, and hopeful people, who will exert their wills and imaginations for their own benefit, as well as in a spirit of faith and social concern. You probably wouldn't have heard that on The Tonight Show, but it's the formula for a much better world. This episode was written by me, Brian Walsh. Production help from Amy Padula and Meredith Hodnott. Editing from Joanna Salataroff with mixing and sound design from Christian Ayala. Host Noam Hasenfeld and Sally Helm are off playing with magnets, and as always, thanks to Brian Resnick for co-creating the show. Bird Pinkerton walked up to the wall in the station and ran her fingers on the crack. She started wondering whether she was even in the right place when, suddenly, the wall pushed in. The crack opened up, and a talent reached out and grabbed her. If you have any thoughts about our show, please send us an email. We're at Unexplainable at Vox.com. We really love hearing from you, and we read every email. Yes, every one. We'd also love if you could leave us a review or a rating, or if you listen. It actually does help us find new listeners. You can also support this show and all of Vox's journalism by joining our membership program. You can go to Vox.com backslash members to get ad-free podcasts and a whole bunch of other goodies. And if you do become a member because of Unexplainable, let us know. It would really make us happy. Unexplainable is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Vox Media Podcast Network Vox Media Podcast Network Vox Media Podcast Network Vox Media Podcast Network Vox Media Podcast Network And built-in intelligence so you can stay focused on whatever you're doing. Dell Technologies. Built for you. Dell.co.uk forward slash Dell PCs. How many third-party vendors does your company use? 20? 200? Thanks to AI, someone on your team probably added three more this week. And your security lead has no idea. Traditional third-party risk management can't keep up. Vanta gives you continuous coverage across every vendor, automatically, so you actually know what's in your stack and what to do about it. AI on, risk off. Vanta.com slash TPRM.
