When SpaceX went public on Friday, it kicked off the first day of trading for what might have been the most highly anticipated initial public offering in history. It was certainly the most expensive one. SpaceX shares opened at a record $150 a piece. In Texas, CEO Elon Musk stood in front of a video of rockets launching and addressed investors. But the IPO itself wasn't the only history made last week. SpaceX going public also made Musk the world's first trillionaire. SpaceX now worth $820 billion. You add in that Tesla stake worth about $280 billion and as total net worth as we have it right now is over $1.1 trillion. It's remarkable. It's clearly a watershed moment. Our colleague, Theo Francis, covers executive pay. Why is this an important moment? It's pretty striking. I do our annual ranking of executive pay of CEO pay and every year there's a few CEOs who make $100 million or more. $100 million. That's a lot of money. And yet I have to remember to use an M and say million instead of B for billion when you're talking about the wealth of people like Zuckerberg and Bezos and Allison and of course Musk. It's a really remarkable moment in terms of individual wealth. And I think the real question is how far does it go? Welcome to the Journal, our show about money, business and power. I'm Jessica Mendoza. It's Tuesday, June 16th. Coming up on the show, who wants to be a trillionaire? At HSBC UK when you invest in your business we're invested too. Whether it's borrowing to buy new equipment, to invest in energy saving or in new technology we cut through the noise with our sector specialists, regional expertise and tailored finance solutions. So if you're looking to grow your business we lend more than money. To get insights on how UK businesses are borrowing for growth, search HSBC business finance. Lending is subject to status, eligibility criteria and T's and C's apply. The internet is coaching our kids. When boys hear that on repeat it shapes how they see themselves. We can't leave it to those voices. We have to be louder. Together. With E. We need to coach them, guide them, back them. Bring our boys up every chance we get. Be yourself. Back your mates. Confidence comes from the beginning. As proud partner of the England teams, EE has support and guidance to help build all our boys up on and off the pitch. Search EE Yes Boys. Before the SpaceX IPO, before he was a trillionaire, you did the story where you tried to put into context just how wealthy Elon Musk is. Why is that such a difficult number to communicate? I mean, do we really understand how big a trillion dollars is? It's like, that's usually the kind of number that we talk about when we talk about economies, when we talk about GDP growth. Not when we talk about companies even. Very few companies until recently even had a trillion dollar market capitalization, which means the total value of what investors think they're worth going forward. Only a handful of companies have reached that level. But now we're talking about an individual and that's just totally new territory. EE Right. It's hard to wrap your mind around that number, much less what it could mean for a single human being. EE Exactly. EE So how did you wind up explaining it? EE I mean, the only thing you can do is compare it to other things. Right? You could say, oh, a trillion is a thousand billion, but that doesn't really do much. EE That doesn't help me. Right. What's a billion, right? So we decided we were going to try to put it in the context of everyday things. EE Okay. EE So just shy of a trillion dollars where he was before the IPO, he could buy 2.4 million houses in the United States at the typical sale price at the beginning of this year. EE For context, the median sale price for a house in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2026 was about $400,000. So Musk could buy 2.4 million of those. EE I mean, that's just the beginning, right? He could also buy all the NFL and NBA teams, every one of them, and still have $500 billion left over. EE Another way to think about it, imagine you see a penny on the street and don't bother picking it up. What would be the equivalent to that penny for Elon Musk? EE If you do the math on that, if you make about $100,000 a year, that penny you might walk by, that's the equivalent of $97,000 to Elon Musk. EE And again, that was before the IPO. Musk's journey from startup guide to trillionaire spans about 30 years. Can you walk us through his financial resume? Like where does this money come from? EE He started out in the mid-90s. He co-founded a company that essentially was one of the dot-com boom companies. EE That company was called ZipTube. And when it sold, Musk walked away with about $22 million. EE He then ended up creating and helping to found and run a payments company, one of the precursors to PayPal as we know it today. EE Musk's payments company combined with PayPal. Making him more than $100 million in 2002. From there, he went on to found or back a variety of different ventures. He became an early investor in a small car company. There were times in Tesla's history where it looked like things were really struggling. But he took over Tesla and kind of set it in the direction that ended up making it the first really popular and arguably sexy electric car company. He launched the Boring Company with a promise to build underground tunnels for cars that would solve traffic problems. EE Elon Musk's Boring Company today got the mayoral nod to Dig Deep, a tunnel for a high-speed trip from downtown Chicago to O'Hare Airport. EE The Boring Company, it tools tunnels. He sort of had this big vision of the hyperloop, which was this idea that you could have very fast mass transit and that does not seem to have a lot of traction at this point. EE The Boring Company has struck agreements with a number of cities, though it's only completed one tunnel in Las Vegas. Musk also co-founded Neuralink, a startup that's trying to develop rain and plant technology. And of course, they're SpaceX. EE Though the company's financial engine is Starlink, a satellite internet service, SpaceX promises to build towards commercial spaceflight. EE SpaceX just pulled off a test launch of its latest Starship Mega Rocket. So here's what it sounded like when it took off from the launch pad in South Texas. EE By 2012, Musk had become a billionaire and his wealth kept growing. You can see how the value of some of his portfolio now lets him do things in other parts of his portfolio as well. And it's kind of a snowball. It's kind of a snowball effect. EE In 2021, Musk became the richest person in the world for the first time. You know, for a long time, Musk was in that conversation along with people like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos. But those other guys are like down in the, it's crazy to say, down in the $200 billion range. And Musk has, you know, clearly exploded beyond that. When and sort of how did that start to happen? EE I mean, some of this was just in the past year, really. When we looked at American billionaires in late summer, early fall last year, he was ahead of the other big tech billionaires, but not by such a huge amount. EE At the time, his wealth was valued at $423 billion. It's more than doubled since. EE At this point, you know, you can add up Bezos and Ellison and Zuckerberg's wealth. And it's still not Elon Musk's. EE Is there a historic analog for this level of wealth for a single person? Like, does Elon Musk have more money now than like John D. Rockefeller did in his time? EE Yeah. I mean, you know, Rockefeller has for a century been sort of the icon of the individual wealthy man, right? Musk overshadows Rockefeller in, again, ways that are sort of hard to wrap your head around, right? Because it's a different time. You know, any dollar figure you can put on John D. Rockefeller's wealth in 1937 is not a dollar figure that applies today. EE But like Rockefeller, whose wealth was largely tied up in standard oil, a lot of Musk's wealth isn't liquid. EE Elon Musk's wealth is not cash. Elon Musk's wealth is almost all tied up in his companies. And some of that we can see directly with Tesla and now SpaceX. Some of it we can't. All together, I'll try to estimate his wealth outside his companies, about $100 billion a little more. So that's a much smaller number, obviously. It's still a very large number. To the extent that his money is tied up in his companies, you can't just go spend it. So, you know, these analogies we're making are analogies. They're not, oh, hey, he could actually go out and buy 2.4 million houses. Because once he starts selling shares, the market is going to notice. EE That's pretty common for many CEOs and founders. Why would people believe in and invest in your company when you're selling your shares? But Teo says it's an even more unique situation for Musk because of the cult of personality that's developed around him. EE Elon Musk is a very unusual taste. A lot of his company's value is tied up in his investor's belief that he can do remarkable things with these companies and that he can get these companies to do remarkable things. So, you know, he can't just go selling, right? That would be a huge problem for his wealth in addition to for all the other shareholders. Because his wealth is largely tied up in his companies, Musk has made some deals that leverage those companies against each other. That's how he was able to buy Twitter in 2022, for example. So when Musk bought Twitter, he borrowed a billion dollars from SpaceX. So to buy a company, he borrowed a billion dollars from a company he owned. Now, he paid it back very quickly. We don't know where he got the funds to pay it back. It could have been borrowing against something else like Neuralink or the Boring Company. So, you know, there is a certain amount of all of this is interconnected, at least as long as Musk is running it and as long as he owns significant stakes in it. But with all that interconnectedness, where is the line between Musk and his companies? That's next. For many investors, Elon Musk is a visionary. And Musk has built a brand around that narrative, driving a lot of the interest in his businesses. Is it the companies or is it Musk or is it both? I think it has to be both, right? I mean, you know, if Elon Musk is a visionary, he's a visionary. He's a visionary. He's a visionary. He has to be both, right? I mean, you know, if Elon Musk didn't have the companies, probably people would back him to start companies. If these companies were run by someone other than Elon Musk, well, we saw a little bit of that in recent years when Tesla was very worried that Musk was not really paying enough attention to the company. He was running doge. He was getting into politics. Musk spent lots of time campaigning for President Trump and later leading the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk has also been focusing heavily on XAI, another venture of his that's since been rolled into SpaceX. All to say, Musk has at times had a lot on his plate. And Teo says that has rattled investors, like in 2024, when Tesla shares dropped roughly 30%. So you do see these moments where his involvement comes into question. And that does weigh on the stock price. But it's the continuing confidence that investors have that he'll manage somehow. So even when there was worry about him not giving his all to Tesla, I mean, the stock didn't tank, right? So either it's not all him or investors were pretty sure he'd come back around because after all, a lot of his wealth is tied up in Tesla. Tesla has a more traditional business structure with an independent board of directors and voting rights for retail investors. But Musk has complained that this setup doesn't give him enough control and it's holding the company back. Tesla CEO Elon Musk threatening he needs more control of Tesla if the company's AI ambitions are going to be met. And it's very clear from the structure of SpaceX that you didn't want to make that mistake again. He wanted to make sure that he had control. So I mean, he has control in so many ways. It's hard to wrap your head around. I've never seen anything like it. After the SpaceX IPO, Musk held on to more than 80% of the company voting rights. And he serves as the CEO and chairman of the board of directors. To signal to investors that he is locked in, Musk prefers to take pay packages and huge amounts of stock tied to specific milestones. At SpaceX, one of these outlandish goals is to put a million person colony on Mars. Another part of it is tied to having a really phenomenal amount of computing power in space. I mean, it's again, one of these numbers that you can't really wrap your head around. Believe me, it is enormous. Either of those is at this point a pie in the sky goal. At the same time, though, if he never hits those goals, he's still the richest man on the planet by a lot. He's still the richest man on the planet. And because of the way that SpaceX pay package was structured, he can still vote those shares that he will only get if he establishes a million person colony on Mars. So, Mars and colony or not, Musk is the world's first trillionaire. What could that mean for other ultra-wealthy people? So, I've never had a billion dollars, much less. Same. Hundreds of billions. But I'm told that for people who make this kind of money, it's more about a scorecard than about what you can actually do with the money. A lot of this money will not be spent for billionaires. Plenty of billionaires, some like Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, have said, I'm going to give essentially all of it away. Others are happy to spend it on super yachts or acquiring companies or, you know, funding their kids' business ventures or whatever. But in many ways, these are their scorecards. That's the kind of thing that spurs competition. There is probably at least among some billionaires a sense that, well, if he can do it, maybe I can too. And I guess this is the question to ask here. How unique is Musk's situation? Like, has he cracked some code about how to manage money and make money that other mega-rich people can try to follow themselves? You know, there's sort of a trope about Apple, that Apple doesn't necessarily invent a technology, but it puts that technology to use and to market in ways that are way more successful than anyone else. The iPod was the most successful, but not the first MP3 player. I think you can look at Elon Musk that way as well, in the sense that was Musk the beneficiary of a unique or highly unusual set of circumstances. Certain kinds of technological change don't happen very often. There was probably a point at which an American electric automaker was going to do really well. And it was Tesla, and that's not to take anything away from it. That's success. But it may not be the kind of opportunity that is available in every industry at every moment for every company. That's all for today, Tuesday, June 16th. The Journal is a co-production of Spotify and The Wall Street Journal. Additional reporting in this episode from Juliette Chung and Max Rust. Thanks for listening. See you tomorrow.
