Anthropic is one of the fastest growing companies in history, but there may be another winner investors can buy right now. Motley Fool Money starts now. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I am Travis Hoyam joined today by Rachel Warren and Lou Whiteman. And guys, we got to start with Anthropic. Their announcement that they have gone from a $9 billion annualized revenue rate, maybe not the best measure for revenue because it's not actually, but it kind of gives you an idea how fast they're growing. So $9 billion at the end of 2025, $30 billion at the end of the first quarter, Rachel, this is just absolutely insane growth from a company at that scale. Yeah, that $30 billion run rate is actually just quite mind blowing. I mean, you put that in perspective, Anthropic essentially tripled its business in just 90 days. I mean, we usually celebrate when a company doubles in a year doing it in a single quarter. I think it shows that at least for now, what many have framed as AI hype, if you will, it's turning into this massive enterprise land grab. This isn't just about startup growth. This is, I think, very much a fundamental shift in how the enterprise world is adopting AI across industries. I think something that Anthropic has really tried to put out there is very much this kind of safety and reliability angle with businesses using Claude, whether it's healthcare giants, tech companies or otherwise. I think it's so doing, they've unlocked the corporate vault, so to speak. I think we're seeing businesses are finally moving past the experimental phase, and they're putting massive budgets behind these models. That's creating exponential tailwinds for Anthropic. I feel like in talking about this, we risk parroting or extending the AI hype, because it's really hard to take a big picture, look at this. I'd note that searches for Claude tripled over the last 90 days, according to Google Trend, that sort of lines up with the revenue. Obviously, I think those are related. We know this. Claude is having its moment. Claude is all we've heard about for the last 90 days or so. That's great. If it's sustainable, it should mean that it's a good business, probably a better business than the other AI giant that wants to go public. I think to assume that this continues is lowercase foolish. Look, there are natural limits here to what people can spend. Travis, I think I said it to you, but there was a viral LinkedIn post last week, a CEO bragging about their four-person companies spending $125,000 a month on Anthropic right now. I'm just going to go out on them. I don't know anything about that business, but you cannot continue to triple that indefinitely. There's just not enough revenue there. This is great. I think all of this does, though, on the revenue side is tell us what we already knew, is that Claude is the only thing we've heard about over the last 90 days or so. Yeah. Their focus on coding specifically really seems to be their differentiator. I know the $20 a month that I'm paying them is probably not really moving. It's really those enterprise customers that are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars per employee. The other angle to this, and this came out yesterday, was that they just signed another deal with Google. Google happens to own 14% of Anthropic, but this is going to be for use of TPUs. They announced this with Google and Broadcom, and they're using TPUs. We hear a lot about NVIDIA owning the market for artificial intelligence. It seems like right now the momentum is behind Anthropic, and Anthropic is moving to TPUs, so that seems pretty notable, Rachel. Yeah. It's a really interesting dynamic. Obviously, the move helps Alphabet's Google. Google has its own AI Gemini, but it wants to be the landlord for everyone else through Google Cloud, and of course, giving Anthropic a large supply of its own specialized ships or TPUs is another key piece of the puzzle there. I also think it really demonstrates the very strategic approach that Alphabet's taking. By providing significant computing power, they ensure that Anthropic, which is of course a major competitor to open AI, remains on Google Cloud, and that strategy means that Google can benefit regardless of which AI model gains dominance. I think the other takeaway element here is something of a warning to NVIDIA. Obviously, I don't think NVIDIA is going anywhere. They have a significant backlog. They're a key reader of the space, but it shows that Google's custom chips could be a viable alternative. I think we might see a world in which other AI startups become less reliant on NVIDIA hardware 10, 15 years in these years ahead. I guess benefiting Anthropic to hurt open AI, I think it's maybe be careful what you wish for. Google's core business on the AI side, I think, is probably a competitor with them. If anything, Anthropic has shown itself to be maybe a smarter competitor or a more disciplined competitor. Yeah. Well, more disciplined for sure. We've been talking about that for months. Yeah. Open AI just can't seem to get out of its own way. If I'm Google, maybe I would prefer Open AI to stomp Anthropic in Summer's Guard. Look, I still worry that all of these models are heading in the same direction and they're all commoditized. Having the multiple ways to win with partners, with investments, with just being the service provider versus the model, that makes a lot of sense to me. It plays to alphabet strength. I think it's a good move for them, but if I'm alphabet, I'm not sure I'm cheering the demise of Open AI to the benefit of Anthropic. Yeah. I mean, that part, if I'm actually the product manager trying to roll out Gemini, I'm not cheering that. Got it. Yeah. Because they're a very real competitor, seem to do a lot of the things that Gemini does not do well. It seems to me that just following this space, I don't have many specific investments that are just AI, but Alphabet's one that I own just because it seems like the only kind of no brainer, no matter what happens, they're going to be around in one way, shape, or form. They will. I mean, the one note on that though is that part of it is backfilling what they could be losing. It's not necessarily just organic growth for them. If search does decline due to AI, their AI can backfill that, but it's not just the unbridled growth that it would be for some of these other companies. Well, a lot that we are going to definitely be covering over the next few months and years likely on Motley Fool Money. Next, we're going to get to where we may be using products like Claude, the new foldable iPhone. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. In the race to scale with AI, you need data infrastructure that can match your pace. EverPeer's data storage platform brings all your data into one hub. No silos, no scrambling, just instant access to tame your data chaos. And with EverPeer's storage as a service subscription, your storage and security upgrade automatically with zero downtime. Your infrastructure stays current, so your business never slows down. Visit everpeerdata.com to learn more today. With EverPeer, you're not just in the race. You're built to win it. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money with the Hidden Gems team. We got news this week that it seems like we're going to likely get a new foldable iPhone as early as September, Rachel. This has been kind of rumored for years. We have other foldable phones out there. Is this notable or is this just going to be another one of those kind of, eh, it's cool. You can make a VR headset. It's cool. You can do all these other things, but it's still not going to be a core product for them or am I overthinking this? I mean, you're right. We've been hearing rumors about this for years. It seems like they're hitting a bit of a fever pitch. I think it's far too soon to say how much of a needle mover this will be for Apple. I think a lot of us are thinking, okay, do we need this? For most of us, our phones are already great. Folding a screed and a half can feel a bit like a flashy solution to a problem no one has. But if you think about why Apple would be doing this, okay, so the smartphone market is maturing, obviously the excitement over having maybe a slightly better camera on the latest generation of one's iPhone is wearing off. And so I do think there's this idea where Apple is saying, even we need something that's a bit more futuristic, gives people a reason to maybe drop $2,000 on a phone again. Apple is doing very well from a financial perspective. They have record services revenue, massive cash pile. They're very profitable, but the hardware growth has been a bit flat. And of course, that's the core of their business, even though services are the fastest growing area. I think it's interesting. You think about markets like China, right? Foldable phones are sort of seen as a status symbol, and a lot of Apple's competitors broadly in Asia have been introducing their own versions of this. There was actually a survey that went around where about 40% of iPhone users that were surveyed in Asia were saying that a foldable could be the ultimate weapon to reclaim a top spot that they might be interested in a folding model. So we'll see if this is something that actually moves the business. It might just be a niche product that a few people buy. If Apple pulls it off, I think it proves that they can still really innovate. If it flops, I think it could be a very expensive distraction from their AI goals. So I was trying to figure out if I think this is the best of Apple or the worst of Apple. And I think the answer is probably both. In one sense, look, the Samsung version has gotten kind of mixed reviews. The reports say that that is exactly what Apple was targeting here to kind of the areas where Samsung has fallen short, durability, the screen kind of creases or whatever. So in a sense, this could be a classic case of Apple not being first, but being best, refining and winning. If this is today's version of the next big thing, maybe we should just kind of give up on the Steve Jobs turtleneck version of Apple. I mean, in a way, maybe Steve, you've conditioned us. We're going to get to the point soon where people don't remember that reference. Well, right, maybe, but I do feel like with Apple, there is still this weird expectation of like, oh, just wait for it. They're cooking up something. And you know what? I think all of the evidence suggests those days are over. If they were cooking up something, we would know it by now. We'll see. Travis, we've talked about it. Whether or not anybody wants an AI pin on their lapel, we'll see. But this is both a very good company doing things they should do. The $2,000 plus sales price, if, you know, assuming people will pay for it is a nice revenue boost, so it is incremental gains. But I think just the mindset, all of us old, sort of used to the guy in the turtleneck saying one more thing, those days are over and we need to value this as a mature company that just kind of continues to create incremental value off of their core products. Yeah. The one thing that I think is interesting with this product in particular is, is Rachel right? This is really just a China product. And if you read the book, Apple and China, one of the things that I took away from that was that Apple was such, and iPhones were such a status symbol. It was not, hey, this is the most productive use of my money. It was just, look, I have an iPhone and you would spend an insane amount of your annual earnings to buy that iPhone. So the cultural differences between China and devices in the US and devices, I think is not something that we necessarily fully understand as US investors, but that seems to be when they make some of these changes and come up with something that looks a little bit different. It spikes in China because there is still that Apple cache. So maybe that is the answer. Is it just something that's kind of made for China? But I keep going back to, is the iPhone just too perfect of a product? Is there just no better answer than here's this flat piece of glass that's a computer that can fit in your pocket and we're just not going to get anything better? I don't. Maybe that's the simple answer. I mean, honestly, the answer is the Google Pixel. I beg to differ, Lou. All right, we'll have to have our iOS, Android battle in a future show. When we come back, we are going to get Lou's thoughts on the latest from Delta. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. What I've dedicated my life to is revenge. A brand new drama based on the best selling novel. They think they're better than us. Who do you think you are? I'm going to prove to them that they're wrong. She's punishing me. You destroyed my family. I will not rest until I've destroyed yours. A woman of substance on Channel 4 stream now. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money with the Hidden Gems team. Delta reported earnings this morning. Lou, what did we learn? So I don't want to bore everybody with all of the numbers and just kind of because, look, honestly, they sort of pre-announced this two weeks ago. That's how the airline industry works, where everything that they announced today was basically what they said they would do. Great quarter, though. And things are holding up. Much more interested in what they're seeing into the future. So far, so good. Right? That's, I think, the airline said it's corporate client survey. 85% expect to maintain or increase their travels bend in the second quarter. Low teens revenue growth. That's, you know, we're expecting 10% or so. But Delta, I marvel here. And, you know, yeah, I mean, they're finally the dead is down below COVID levels. We like to see that. And again, they gave us exactly what we wanted. But you marvel here is I don't think we fully appreciate what Delta did to save this industry in 2008. They were the first ones to do a bankruptcy, to buy a competitor, kind of, you know, take out Travis's hometown airline. But they rethought how can we both beat the discounters and still gain margin and gain advantages. Every legacy has followed that. And this is why we're in a better place today. One note, my favorite known as quarter Travis, people have made fun for a decade of Delta buying an oil refinery in Philadelphia. That refinery was a $300 million incremental profit boost in the quarter. Also, having that there in Philadelphia, and the reason they bought it wasn't because they wanted to speculate on oil, it was because they were worried about whether or not jet fuel would be available in New York. That refinery is the reason why that over in Europe, they were canceling flights. In the US, the flights just got more expensive. Look, I'm still not going to buy Delta stock. I don't like buying airline stocks, but this company, maybe with United as its only rival, is just so well run and sees things so well. It's just, and this quarter, this is why they are the best. I agree. I think it's probably one of the most well run, if not the most well run of the airline companies. A few things stuck out to me in addition to what Lou said. You know, they were unprofitable under gap, but they reported an adjusted profit that grew by more than 40%. Another interesting piece of this, revenue from premium seats, corporate travel, loyalty programs makes up more than 60% of the top line at this point. Premium revenue was up 14% in the quarter. Main cabin revenue actually increased for the first time since late 2024. So that was another element that I think kind of surprised me, even though the most significant growth that we're seeing is in those premium areas. As Lou noted, they're doing a good job of cleaning up the balance sheet. CEO Ed Bastion said that Delta is going to meaningfully reduce their capacity growth plans in the near term as fuel costs soar. It isn't clear though, if or when customers will pull back. Certainly, of course, in these results we're seeing now, there is a very, very robust tailwind carrying them into this next quarter of growth. So overall, I think a good start to the reports from the airlines for this earnings season. Yeah, we keep looking for canaries in the coal mine that the economy is getting weaker and they just never seem to show up. So we'll keep looking, but with the market where it is, we're bouncing back today, early on Wednesday, maybe one of the best days that we've ever had in the stock market, at least on certain metrics. But the economic weakness that I think would show up in a lot of those airlines first has not shown up yet. So we'll see what happens, especially with oil prices in the future and how consumers are feeling. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against Soto Buyer sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows the Motley Fool's editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content, provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. We're Lou Whiteman, Rachel Warren and Dan Boyd by In the Glass. I'm Travis Oym. Thanks for listening to Motley Fool Money. We'll see you here tomorrow.
