You need to understand what is happening right now is the church is not getting more political politics have gotten spiritual in the last 20 years. We didn't move politics did. Alright, welcome to another test drive episode of a react video. So here's how this is going to work. I'm going to be reacting to Texas State Representative James Tallerico. I'm going to do my very best to get to the end of this video without slamming this microphone into my head. This is going to be great. A couple things I'll say here. Number one, this these little react bonus episodes is a test drive. So it's huge straight. If you like them, drop a comment on YouTube or like or whatever and honestly that helps us know like, oh, they actually like these things. And that will help us out. Also, anybody of the comments, we're going to give away 10 of these live free hats. We're going to keep live free nation rolling. James Tallerico, here we come. Now, just heads up before I click play. You are probably going to notice at a couple times in this video, I'm a little more rough with my language than I typically would be. And some well-meaning Christians hear that and they're like, man, Pastor Josh, I thought the New Testament commanded us to be gentle and respectful in our responses. And let me say two things. Number one, you're right. It does. And that should be our default mode. However, what you're going to notice, and I'm explaining why I'm going to approach this like I'm going to do it. What you're going to notice is the new that the New Testament, it differentiates between two types of people who have the same types of beliefs. There are people who I like to call sometimes refugees from the world. Where honestly, they have some like terrible beliefs. But they're kind of like, man, I'm sick of the world and I'm stumbling at a church. I'm trying to figure it out. Can y'all help me? Those are refugees from the world. On the other hand, there's a second category of people that I would call apostles of the world. They are people who are walking into churches and walking into the lives of Christians with the demonic specific intent to deceive Christians and advance evil and destroy their faith. James Talleriko, I think, is probably in the second category of people. If you didn't know this, he claims to be a pastor. There are tons of videos of him on YouTube preaching to a congregation with kind of a reverend vibe. So I'll be a little more direct than you have seen me be in other videos because again, as Christians, we differentiate between refugees from the world and apostles of the world. That Jesus called things like you, brew dividers and the apostle Paul said about guys like this. Watch out for the dogs, the mutilators of the flesh, etc. etc. Okay, so there we go. That said, let's hear what the reverend has to say. Here we go. For the past 50 years in this country, the religious right, a political movement, a lot of Christians in America that the two most important issues were abortion and homosexuality. All right, two issues that aren't. Sorry about that. Okay, let me begin by saying something. There are two types of Christians when it comes to how they relate to politics. And this is really important that you get this because he talks about the religious right, a quote unquote political movement that has convinced people to prioritize certain things. Two types of Christians. There's Christian conservatives and there's conservative Christians. You need to figure out which word stands in authority over the other word. Christian conservatives are people who's like, man, I'm on team Jesus and that's the most important thing in my life. And honestly, the only reason that I sort of like think of myself as a political conservative is because right now in the modern political taxonomy, the ethics of the kingdom map better on to modern conservatism than they definitely do modern progressivism. But for those people, their Christianity stands in authority over their conservatism. There's another group of people who are, they're not Christian conservatives, they're conservative Christians. And very frankly, there are some people who they're more committed to modern political conservatism than they are their Christianity. And so wherever their Christianity calls them away from whatever's kind of the vibe of the modern political conservative movement, they actually side with conservatism over their Christianity. At wrong, do not pass go, do not collect $200. So you do need to have that differentiation in your head. Now what he says, what you heard James Talleriko say right here is a nice little slide of hand is, man, there's this modern religious right political conservatism that they convinced people to make issues like abortion and homosexuality the most important things. Now a couple of things I need to say here and then we'll move on. What you will constantly hear from progressives right now about Christians is, man, the church is getting more political. You need to understand what is happening right now is the church is not getting more political. Politics have gotten spiritual in the last 20 years. When the government moved past things like building roads, issuing drivers licenses and teaching math to things like redefining marriage, erasing gender, reframing infant murder as a human positive of reproductive rights, and then using the government school system into indoctrinating all of your kids into believing all those things, we didn't move politics did. So it's simply a slide of hand for him to say, oh, this is supposed to be a religious movement and it got political. Now politics got religious is what happened now. The other thing he does here and again, I'm going to talk about this so that you get it. As he says quote, the religious right, quote, convinced the American people that abortion and homosexuality were the biggest issues. First of all, number one is overt national rebellion against God a big deal. So overall, we didn't convince the religious right didn't convince Christians that slaughtering 60 million infants and high handed sexual degradation at a national level. The political right didn't convince us those things were a big deal. The Bible did. So that's number one. Number two, what he says, the religious right convinced American Christians that these things were a big deal. What I want to say is whoopsy Daisy, who is the one that made these two issues a big deal in the last 50 years? Well, he's, I'm just going to this might feel partisan. I'm just going to speak to him straight for a way. James Salarico is a Democrat. What I would say is who made those, those two issues a big deal in the last 50 years? My brother, you did. You did. Who is it that made the basis of their entire political movement reframing infant slaughter as a human right? You, your party did. And who is the one that redefined marriage and then prosecuted any government employees who wouldn't consent to your perverse redefinition of marriage and then projected rainbow flags on the White House and got anyone fired who wouldn't affirm your redefinition of marriage? My brother, your party did. So we didn't make these a big deal. You made these a big deal. We were just doing our thing that every human society has done for the last 5,000 years on this and you changed it. So this is something that toddlers will do very often. Is they'll kind of have this vibe of, hey, we're allowed to do evil things, but you're not allowed to say anything about it. And if you say anything about it, why are you throwing a big fit? Okay, that's what toddlers do. Now, let me go back and let's pick up and homosexuality. Two issues that aren't really discussed in scripture. I beg your finest pardon. That's a very interesting thing to say. Let's see what he's going to do here. Abortion has never mentioned consensual, same-sex relationships are never mentioned. All right. So we got, I'm very interested to see how he contorts himself into a pretzel to do this. But let me just get ahead of this. He says abortion is ever mentioned. My friend, murder is mentioned. Murder is mentioned. There's this verse that says, you shall not murder. So it's really interesting. And again, you're going to see some retort like old school high school debate team, whoever controls the terms wins the debate. So what I see from people like this constantly is they'll redefine the terms, they'll force you to argue on their terms and heads up if you argue on their terms, you will always lose. So what he's doing is he's redefining life and he's redefining murder. And then he's gone, well, if you accept my redefinition of life and of murder, then the Bible never mentions these things. That's insane. So let me just ratchet these things really quick. First of all, Psalm 139 specifically illuminates that life does begin in the womb. It says, you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because I'm fearfully and wonderfully made. Your eyes saw my unformed body. There you go. It's right there. The first person to worship Jesus in the entire Bible was an unborn baby, John the Baptist. Interestingly, I'm doing this real quick because a lot of Christians have this little slide of hand plate on them. Abortions never mentioned. And well, meaning but naive Christians don't know what's safe. Let me just help you blow this thing to smithereens. Interestingly, Exodus 21, by the way, does the same thing that modern American law does. And it treats unborn children as lives. So if you get drunk and you run into a car in America that a pregnant woman was driving and you kill the baby that was in her womb, you are going to be charged with this thing called manslaughter. Okay. Now what's interesting. So there's a there's a logical fallacy in American current American law. What's interesting is that reflects Exodus 21. I'm going to read you Exodus 21. It says when men strive together and hit a pregnant woman so there are children come out, but there is no harm. The one who hit her shall surely be fined. Okay. Now you on that passage and it says and he shall pay as judges determine. But watch this verse 23. If there is harm and then the Bible says then you shall pay life for life. So it's honest like you keep going on. The Bible extremely clearly defines life as beginning in the womb and all of these things. So I can listen. I'm not going to go on this. Like going back to the did a K which was an ancient text written by Christians around AD 70. It says you shall not procure an abortion in AD 74. The Christian letter it's called the letter of Barnabas says thou shall not slay the child by procuring an abortion. The early church father Tertullian writes in AD 197. Murder being once for all forbidden. We may not destroy even the fetus in the womb. John Chrysostom says in AD 392. Early church father murder before the birth. Listen, Brian just going on. You have to you have to like jettison. 2000 years of near unanimous Christian theology to say that a abortion is not murder. And then you have to just lie to everybody's faces to say the Bible never mentions abortion. There's actually like an evil hysteria about it. The other thing he says let me do this so much quicker so we can get back to watching the right reverend here. He says the consensual same sex relationships are never mentioned in the Bible. This is if you're unfamiliar with this debate. This is a slide of hand loophole that progressive Christians try to do. What they do is you'll see guys like Matthew Vines who is an enemy of the faith and apostate an enemy of the faith. What they do in order is like that advocates for gay Christianity. What they do to try to get around because you can't get around the fact that the Bible clearly mentions homosexuality and same sex sexual interaction as sinful. What these people do to try to lortal sort of like Jedi mind trick you is they try to reinterpret any passage dealing with same sex sexuality in the Bible. As all that wasn't actually talking about consensual same sex relationships. That was actually talking about things like petaracity or man boy love that was common in ancient Rome. Couple problems with that the Bible. You got Leviticus 1822. You show not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. It's right there. It's like bro it's literally just right there. Leviticus 20 verse 13. If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. There's no qualifiers around those. And then Romans, so you're like, yeah, but what about the New Testament? Romans 126. Now this actually flies directly in the face of what Taloriko says right here. He says, oh, there's no mention of consensual same sex relationships. I'm about to read you a passage where like it literally outlines that they were consensual same sex relationships that are assigned to the wrath of God. Romans 126 and 127 because of this God gave watch this gave them over to shameful lust. In other words, he gave human societies over to their own desires. So these were desires. Even their women exchange natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. Verse 27. In the same way, the men also abandoned natural relations with women. Now watch this. And we're inflamed with lust for one another. So like it's literally specifically highlighting these were mutual consensual same sex lesbian relationships. And if you go down Romans 1, it's giving you a checklist of all the things you'll start to see in a society when it's under the wrath of God. And what Romans 1 does is it goes man, when a society gets as bad as it can get, then you start having a widespread open same sex sexual relations with each other. And then it goes on men committed shameful acts with other men and received in themselves the do penalty for their error. So honestly, like I'm just going to say it like he's lying. Let's see what else we'll do here. And so it's it's remarkable to me that you have an entire political movement using Christianity to prioritize two issues that Jesus never talked about. Okay. It's got a couple of things here. First of all, argument from silence. Jesus never mentioned B.C.ality, incest, nuclear warheads or paper straws, but they're all abominations to. Okay. Here's the other thing. Again, let's get going back to this. He's trying to redefine life and redefine murder and then saying and then say, oh, the Bible never talked about this type of life and this type of murder. Okay. Jesus did specifically mention the Old Testament command. You shall not murder in the sermon on the mount. Jesus did specifically command you to love your neighbor as yourself. I don't think killing your neighbor and chopping them up into pieces and then selling their their body parts is loving your neighbor as yourself. And then in Matthew 18, Jesus specifically says, man, the father is not willing that any of these little ones should perish. Who are the little ones? Babies. Jesus also, and again, you hear this a lot. Jesus never talked about homosexuals out or same sex relationships. That's insane. So what Jesus did, there's two ways, Bible scholars talk about this. There's two ways to forbid something. Either you can list every single thing that's wrong or you can point out the one thing that's right and then by implication, everything that's not that one thing is forbidden. That's what Jesus did. Jesus very specifically defined marriage. So I'm just going to read it. Jesus said, have you not read that he who made them in the first place made them man and woman. So now we have an affirmation of biologically determined gender and you have an affirmation of of heterosexuality within marriage. Verse five, it says, for this reason, a man will leave his father and mother and cleave live with his wife. The two will become one. So they are no longer two, but one let no man divide what God has put together. There you go. So Jesus defines what marriage is and then the implication of Jesus goes, here's the one, here's the one ideal. And then the obvious implication is that everything outside of that ideal is by implication forbidden. So yeah, Jesus did talk about this. Jesus also used the Greek word, poor, naeah, from which we get the English word pornography. And what that is is is a catch all term describing anything outside of predominantly the old testament's view of sexual ethics. And obviously we just read it that that forbids homosexual sexual expression. All right, let's keep going see if we move a little quicker. And so I'm not saying they're not important. I actually think both of those issues are very important. But to focus on those two things and I very much wonder what he means by that. He says he thinks both those issues are very important. Interesting. Instead of feeding the hungry and healing the sick. All right. Okay, I want you to hear this whole time to focus on those two things instead of feeding the hungry and healing the sick and welcoming the stranger. Three things were told to do ad nauseam in scripture. Okay, you're going to see this a lot. So you need to understand this. Yeah, he said three things like feeding the hungry, healing the sick and welcoming the stranger. And then I'm going to quote James Saloreco. He says things that Jesus commanded us to do in the scriptures. He's right. Jesus commanded us as individual Christians to do those things. Interestingly, what Jesus did not command in the scripture was for human governments to forcibly acquire people's wealth and then redistribute it for human governments to do those things. I have a feeling we're going to get into this here in a second, but I just want to agree with him. Yes, Jesus commanded us to do those things. And let me just say every single Christian should be examining their life and their personal generosity in their family to make sure they are doing those things. But there's something Jesus did not do. He did not command human governments to do those things. Let's keep going and that may come up again. Let's see. To me, it's just is my blowing. How do you understand that because I'm Jewish, but when I read the new talk and as a decline from the New York Times, testament. I am I always come away a little bit amazed that politicized Christianity is so worried about gender sexuality and so unconcerned with greed. Whoopsy daisy. Okay, I can help you out Ezra. Okay. What you're going to notice here's a big idea is that when the left, when the modern left and right and again, let me just re emphasize this. Christians are on team Jesus. We do not have a political loyalty. We are going to be for whichever quote unquote side more aligns with team Jesus. Okay. But I'm going to talk in sort of party categories just because how the thing maps itself out right now. When the left and the right modern left and right use the words greed and generosity. They're using the same glossary, but they have different dictionaries. They're using the same words, but they have different definitions of the words greed and generosity. So in general, when conservatives use the word generosity, they mean generosity with their own money. I am choosing like hopefully every Christian family does to set aside a part of our income for us to willingly choose to give that to people that are in need and support the advanced of the kingdom of God. So when conservatives use the word generosity, they mean generosity with their own money. When progressives use the word generosity, they mean generosity with other people's money. They mean voting to put people in power who will take other people's money, never their own other people's money and redistribute it to other people. So for conservatives, generosity is a willing choice to give away money for progressives generosity is voting for the government to take away other people's money and give it away. Now, here's why you see this. This is always very interesting to me. When you see progressives like Ezra Klein and James Taylor, echo this, oh, conservatives, they're not concerned with greed. First of all, I'll be honest, dude, as a pastor, I'm a Bible teacher. I don't know what tech they're talking about. I have never been in a church. I've never even heard of a church that doesn't consistently preach on greed and generosity. The other thing that I'll point out is virtually every data set shows that Christian conservatives are about three times more generous with their time and their money than progressives are. So it's really interesting. You'll hear progressives all the time talk about how my Christian conservatives, they don't care about greed. But then you look at the data and the data is that Christian conservatives are literally three times more generous than progressives are. I'm going to give you some quick stats and then we'll keep going. For instance, when Bernie Sanders was running for president in 2016, his tax returns came out. Dude was giving less than one percent of his income to charity in the last year. When Pete Buttigieg, I think that's how you pronounce his name, was making his little run exact same thing. These were the generosity candidates. They were the ones who wanted to be generous to the poor. And then when Pete Buttigieg, open homosexual was running for office. It also came out less than one percent of his income was given to charity. And then when Biden, I looked this up in prep of this, when Biden was selected as a VP candidate in 2008, it was like a big deal that when a little tax returns came out that he super wealthy family had given less than $4,000 over an entire decade to any charitable causes. So what's really interesting is you'll hear political progressives say that Christian conservatives don't care about greed and their greedy when actually the data is literally the exact opposite. Why? Because when the left and the right use the word generosity, they mean two different things. Conservatives mean generosity with their own money. Progressives mean generosity with other people's money. Now watch how a Talleriko responds to this. You're preaching to the choir. You know, I absolutely concerned for the poor concern for the oppressed is everywhere. I mean, economic justice is mentioned 3,000 times in our scriptures. I would love to know what he means by the phrase economic justice. That's interesting. Let's keep going. He said economic justice is mentioned 3,000 times. So this is such a core part of our tradition and it's nowhere to be seen in Christian nationalism or on the religious right. I'm just going to go back to this. He says that generosity, the poor is quote, nowhere to be seen on the religious right. Again, we just get going back to this literally all the data is that the religious right are the most generous people in America. Now, let me just say a couple things real quick here because this is really important. You're going to hear this a lot in the coming years because right now trajectory may change right now on the political left. Socialism and socialism light, hard socialism and socialism light policies are gaining steam. So you can hear this a lot in the coming years. So let me help you out with this. So speaking of things earlier in this react video, they talked about things that were never mentioned in the Bible. Okay. Speaking of things never mentioned in the Bible, the phrase economic justice is never mentioned in the Bible. Okay. Now, here's we're going to go back to this when the left and the right use words, they're using the same glossary different definitions. One of this is super important. Listen, really close. One of the words that both the left and the right use, but they mean different things when they say it is the word justice. This is really important and it is the bifurcation line between a lot of things on the modern left and the and the modern right. So here's what I mean. When the Bible talks about justice, the most common phrase used in the Bible to describe justice is this phrase equal weights and measures. Bookmark that in your head equal weights and measures. Okay. When progress. So what that means is equal standards should be applied for individuals. So when the Bible says equal weights and measures, it's saying, hey, man, when people it's like using an old testament allergy when somebody walks up to buy an old testament. When somebody walks up to buy a, you know, a leader of wheat or a, you know, a pound of barley. Make sure you use equal weights and measures. So when you're putting them on scales, you don't use a false set of weights and you tell the guy that he's buying a pound and he's actually buying 0.8 pounds. So for that you're using different sets of weights and measures for wealthy, powerful people and poor struggling people is equal weights and measures. Now here's the big idea. Listen, we're close. In the Bible, justice is equal standards for individuals. But progressivism is not built on Christian theology. It's built on critical theory. And in critical theory and progressivism, their definition of justice isn't equal standards for individuals. It's equal outcomes for groups. That's really important. So they'll kind of go like, okay, we need black people and white people and Asian people to race mark system black people and white people and Asian people and let's subdivide category society into these categories. And then we just need to sort of Jerry rigged the system get a rigged the system where all the groups get different outcomes. So for instance, this is Harvard deciding, hey, we need our admissions classes to reflect the exact demographics of the United States of America equal outcomes for groups. Here's the problem. You actually have to commit injustice to pursue that definition of justice. You actually have to use unequal weights and measures for individuals in order to manufacture equal outcomes for different racial and socio economic groups. This is why, if you haven't been paying attention, like this is why white and Asian students had to score 30 to 50% higher on the same tests in order to gain admission to Ivy League schools as African American students. Why? Because we have to use unequal weights and measures to manufacture equal outcomes for groups. This is why, for instance, Pete Hankseth just nicks this. Thank you, Pete. This is why the military, for instance, had to do one set of physical standards for men. And then because they wanted to admit women into every level of the combat parts of the military, they had to come up with an entirely different set of physical standards for the women. Again, watch. You have to commit injustice unequal weights and measures in order to manufacture progressive justice, which is equal outcomes for groups. Now, when James talks about quote unquote economic justice, I have a feeling he's using the progressive definition of justice. We need equal outcomes instead of equal standards. Okay. I'm going to say one other thing on this because it's really important and then we'll get back to this. The other thing, if you're asking the question, okay, why do Christians that care about generosity so much, not advocate advocate for like socialism, light policies that max boost welfare states and quote unquote governmental generosity to the poor. Let me do this really quick. This what I'm getting ready to say is going to become the dividing line in the next few years, in my opinion. The reason for this is a due name Abraham Kiper that came up that identified this and it's called Kiperians fear sovereignty for you theology nerds. Basically, when you get in the Bible, God establishes three institutions for the right ordering of society, the family, the church, and the state. Each of them have their own jurisdictions and there's different responsibilities that God assigns to the different jurisdictions. So God assigns, for instance, the education and the discipleship of children, the feeding of children to the family. He does not assign that to the church or the state. And then the church's role is word and sacrament the states role according to Romans 13 and the book of first Peter the states role is justice your job state government is to be quote reward those who do good and be a quote terror to those who do wrong. Okay, here's the big idea is that in the Bible, God assigns the primary responsibility for charity to the family and to the church, not to the state. So over and over again, individual Christians, families and churches are commanded by God to practice generosity and hey, Christians, we should cheer that on and practice that with our all arts. What you do not see in the government is are in the Bible is God commanding governments to take on the primary role of charity and then for governments to forcibly acquire people's earned wealth and then redistribute it and become a charity where a country not a charity is kind of the idea. And there's a reason for this that's a wisdom thing that we could get into. I'll just say it really quick. The reason for this is because with governments, you tend to get more of what you incentivize and less of what you penalize. I must say it more time with governments, you tend to get more of what you incentivize and less of what you penalize that right there is why when states like Washington and California, they max boost government programs to quote unquote care for the homeless. Guess what happens they end up overrun by more homelessness, they do not end up solving homelessness why because with governments, you tend to get more of what you incentivize and less of what you penalize. So there's your answer, Ezra and James, let's keep going. And the Bible is all over the place when it comes to marriage. Paul tells us not to get married and you grow. So certainly different many different kinds of marriages throughout scripture. And the same with gender, you know, Paul says that in Christ, there is neither male nor female, which is pretty woke for the first century, you know, and oh my gosh. All right. So we said the Bible is all over the place on marriage and on gender. Ladies and gentlemen, Paul was woke because of Galatians three. So let me say this because a lot of Christians who are new to the Bible, they honestly get tripped up on this. Hey, there's lots of polygamous relationships in the Bible. Does that mean the polygamy is okay? Oh, yes, here's a big idea. This is actually really easy to understand. Hey, the Bible tells the stories of the lives of sinners. So guess what? It records sin. So what Bible commentators do is they'll differentiate and wise Bible reigning Christians will be able to do this. They'll differentiate between what the Bible describes and what the Bible prescribes. Just because the Bible describes a bunch of wrong relationships doesn't mean that the Bible is prescribing those relationships. And guess what, ladies and gentlemen, literally every single time the Bible prescribes what marriage should look like it is one man and one woman in a lifelong sexual sexual fidelity relationship. This is the easiest to see whoever designs it gets to define it go back to Genesis one and two. And when God creates things and declares that they are good, what does he create? He creates one dude and one woman and a lifelong loving covenantal relationship. So difference between what the Bible describes and prescribes now what he also does and honestly this is novel. I've never seen anybody do this before. So in one sense hats off James in another sense. I want to bang the microphone against my head. In defense of transgender ideology seemingly state representative, taleriko is trotting out Galatians three which says quote there is neither male nor female. Now my brother, well Paul very obviously is not meaning is that when somebody gets saved, their genitals change or they their biological gender no longer matters. And dudes can now dress like chicks and all the things. In fact, my friend, if you were to read the Apostle Paul, the Apostle Paul is like the most gender based guy you've ever come across in your life. He gives extremely societally unpopular gender specific commands like husbands, you're the head of your wife and wives, you should submit to your husbands and all things as unto the Lord. Husbands, get out there and provide for your family and wives prioritize your home. We can someday will do the head covering passages. But I mean like what Paul clearly does not mean is that when you get saved, that is somehow the erasure of all biological gender distinctions. Galatians three is addressing the Galatian heresy of there was a group called the judisers that was trying to make a dividing line and dividing the church between people who were circumcised and people who weren't circumcised and they were kind of gone the circumcision party was saying that really the only people were actually saved or people who are Jewish people who are circumcised. So in Galatians three Paul says there's neither Jew nor Greek, there's neither slave nor free, there's neither male nor female. He's not saying that grace or race is nature. What he's saying is, and this is wonderful news, that with respect to salvation and Jesus Christ, it doesn't matter who you are brother, that matter who you are sister, you just come because the ground is level at the foot of the cross. So no distinctions with relationship to salvation. So yeah, again, it's because religion is being used to control people and accumulate like James Talleriko does. James Talleriko is trying to use Bible verses to control you to vote for things like quote unquote free universal health care news flash is not free. Socialism light redistributive policies. You're doing that James. You're the one that's using the Bible to quote unquote control people in your way is Christian nationalism for me, but not for the for James Talleriko power and wealth for those at the top. This is the tale is all this time and it is not unique to Christianity. Powerful people will always see religion as a tool to make more money and and and and be able to keep people in line. Like James Talleriko trying to use the Bible to permit abortion and gay marriage, but command socialism and open borders. Last thing, why is this guy really popular? That is that is the most amount of biblical contradictions. I think I've ever seen crammed into two minutes and 23 seconds in my entire life. So why is this guy really popular heads up. We have a specific prophecy in the New Testament that in the end times in the last days people will not put up with sound doctrine, but they will gather for themselves teachers who will say what they want the teachers to say because they have itching ears and this guy is really popular because there's a lot of godless people who it's like they got this thing and they're like I need somebody to tell me that this is okay and that this is what everybody should be doing. And this is a false teacher that is willing to scratch itching ears. James Talleriko ladies gentlemen.
