The Godfather Part II Review | Archive

Spring weekends are all about enjoying the season together. Before everyone arrives, I stop by my local Total Wine & More to grab a great wine. They have so many to choose from, and the lowest prices make it easy to grab an extra bottle for everyone. If you're not sure what to pick, their friendly guides can help. Find what you love and love what you find. Only at Total Wine & More. Curbside pickup and delivery available in most areas. Visit TotalWine.com to learn more. Spirits not sold in Virginia and North Carolina. Drink responsibly B21. Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public, you can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto, and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one-of-a-kind index, and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable, and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com slash podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash podcast. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Generated assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. There's a difference between liking a house and actually getting it. Redfin is built to make up that difference and close the gap between finding and owning the home for you. Redfin agents close twice as many deals as other agents. So when you find a home you love, you're not a step behind when it comes to making an offer. That means less watching great homes disappear and more focus on the one you'll call home. Redfin helps turn saved listings into real addresses. Get started at redfin.com. Own the dream. This is Janna Kramer from Wine Down with Janna Kramer. Every Mother's Day I tell myself I'm going to be more thoughtful than flowers because flowers are beautiful but they don't last. In my house everyone always ends up in the kitchen. Friends, family, the kids and I love having things around that spark conversation and feel special. That's why I love the Lenox Spice Village and your mom will too. It's a set of 24 hand-painted little houses that are actually spice jars and I swear people notice it the second they walk in. It's charming, it's nostalgic and it somehow makes even everyday cooking feel a little more fun. And here's the best part, it actually gets used every day. Whether you're starting the full set or helping her complete one she's loved for years, there's a whole world of spice village to explore. This Mother's Day, give her something she'll treasure long after the card is put away. Trust me, once you see it you'll want one too. Find the full collection at Lenox.com slash Spice Village. What kind of a show are you guys putting on here today? You're not interested in art? No. Now look, we're going to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation. Hey Film Spotters, Friday we have our top five Robert Duvall scenes coming. A bit of overlap there Josh in terms of some of the characters. One scene in common but only one scene in common. A very good I think thorough list and with Duvall on our minds we thought why not dip into the archive and pick out a review of one of his most famous roles, certainly one of his most famous and most critically acclaimed movies. And this is one that we haven't actually shared with the film spotting public ever before just with family members. Yeah, a bonus bonus is what this is. I mean we thought of doing this after our Sacred Cow 50th anniversary review of The Godfather. We just thought how can we talk about The Godfather and then just you know move on and not reckon with The Godfather Part 2 as well. So we did review Part 2 as a bonus show for film spotting family members not long after that. And yeah, now we're going to share it with everyone. So from February 2022 here is that review of The Godfather Part 2. If anything in this life is certain, the epistaries taught us anything. It's like you can kill anyone. Is it worth it? Film spotting bonus content as we discuss The Godfather Part 2 following our recent Sacred Cow review of The first Godfather from 1972. And I'm inclined, Josh, of course, because it's the lowest hanging fruit to start with something along the lines of is this movie actually better than Godfather one? And that inclination stems from a few things. One, it's just inevitable when you've got two movies of this stature and reputation coming out within two years of each other. You got to compare them. The fact that they have spoiler alert, both stood the test of time, and are both masterpieces kind of begs the question. We also did just watch these movies almost back to back. So have them very clear in our minds. We also have film spotting madness, the best of the 1970s coming up where this decision may actually be forced upon us before the final round. If they advance as we think they very well could, it could come down to The Godfather versus The Godfather Part 2 to compete in the Madness final. And there are also things like the once a decade sight and sound list that come out. We did our own kind of riff on it back in 2012. Obviously, in a few months, we'll get the 2022 version. And you can't cheat. It's not a film spotting top five list where I want to just combine two movies. You got to pick the Godfather or The Godfather Part 2, or you know, you can put them both in your top 10. I made the decision back in 2012 to go with The Godfather Part 1. After saying all of that, I'm going to resist and maybe we'll come around to it. I was actually texting with a longtime listener, friend of the show, Brett Merriman over the weekend after rewatching The Godfather Part 2. And we were dancing around this question and we have initially different answers to the question. But I like where we ended up better or where I should say Brett ended up. He said maybe the question is after two movies, not which film is better. But is Michael Corleone the greatest character in cinema history? Are you willing? Oh my gosh willing to go that far? No, I mean, throwing throwing that at me immediately. No, I mean, he shakes very and he's grand. He has as many layers as you would hope for a cinematic character to have. But I'm going to have to do a little more research on that Adam before I give him that status. And yeah, as those who follow me on Letterbox know, I'm definitely not going to choose a Godfather film in this conversation. I pretty much set that aside as soon as this second film started. I don't, I think doing that does a disservice to both films. And I know there's hypocrisy there. We're going to talk about hypocrisy in this conversation, I think. And there's hypocrisy in me who is part of a show that is built on lists and ranking and all that sort of nonsense to refuse to participate here. But I'm just not going to do it. I just want to talk about other things. So I'm glad you're suggesting a different avenue to do that. Maybe we'll create another Patreon tier. And that tier I will reveal which film I really think is better. But for now, for now, let's see let's go back to your Michael Corleone question. And wow, what a great character who is given much more depth, much more conflicting. The audience has many more conflicting responses to him, I would say in part two than they do in part one. And so is Michael a more compelling character in part two? Yes, I will concede that that is without a doubt, inarguable. And how great is Pacino in pulling that off? I mean, the narrative does it, of course, this is his story fully his story now. It's not we talked about how that opening wedding sequence in part one set up, I don't know, 10 potential narratives for a movie. And Michaels was one of those we know from the opening moments he's in that seat, he's in that chair, the blackness is now behind him. And this is going to be his story and Pacino to his credit, steps up to the plate and just knocks it out of the park. There's a there's a further stillness here. There's a further controlled element. There's a dangerousness to Michael Corleone in this movie that despite all the havoc and murder and death, he instigated in the first film. He was dangerous there, but there's a further sense of danger to him here that Pacino gives us in how he holds himself. That connects, I should say, we'll get to De Niro to De Niro, but that connects to the dangerousness that I have always associated more with De Niro in his performances. But somehow he and Pacino, despite, you know, not sharing a scene together, are reverberating on that same sort of electricity, they capture that same sort of electricity. How about the fact that Michael Corleone smiles, if I'm correct, just once in this movie. And it's not so much that he smiles, but it's how quickly it's withdrawn and what replaces it. This is in Havana with Fredo. And Fredo turns to him, you know, ridiculous, out of place, doesn't know what he's doing, Fredo, and asks, how do you say banana daiquiri in Spanish, you know, making a fool of himself? Michael chuckles. He can't help but kind of laugh at his brother a little bit, right? It's instinctive. And he says, you say banana daiquiri, right? Half an instant later, Fredo turns around and that smile, that genuine smile, just it's like he realizes he made a mistake. He let emotion in. He let emotion into someone he knows he's going to have to cut out. And immediately we get the killer shark eyes back. So I think Pacino is, you know, just doing all-time work here. I think we also see the birthing of maybe Big Pacino. How about the delivery of Not In My Home? Like you can see where he's going to go in later years. But this is just a supreme performance. Yeah, it really is. And I knew that that question, or Brett's question, was probably a bit much to start the conversation off, certainly without any warning whatsoever. It's a big thing to tackle as you think about the entire history of cinema and all of your favorite characters. But I like the question for many reasons. One is that I think it's a conversation that you can actually have about this character and about this performance. But also because it gets at what for me was, I suppose, I'll say the surprise of The Godfather 2. When we talked about The Godfather, we got into some of the things that maybe we weren't expecting or we had a certain image in our mind based on previous viewings. And this time we keyed in on something else. Last time it was just the structure and how sound and how tight it was. Here, it was the arc of Michael's character and what it builds on from The Godfather Part One. And my sense of the Michael we get in Part Two, based on my past viewings, was that it really did pick up exactly where it left off in The Godfather 1. And what I mean is, we mostly see, despite how touching some of those scenes are between him and his father, and even early on how warm and gentle he is with Kay, once he joins his father, once he says, I'm with you, and those wheels get set in motion of him becoming the Don, we see that humanity just sort of vacate Michael and he is that shark by the end of it. And where this movie starts, that's definitely still the Michael we see, right? In all of the conversations with the senator, he's even colder and more ruthless than anything we saw in The Godfather Part One. But over the course of this film, what makes it again so tragic? I talked about how effective the arc was in Part One as well. He says to Kay, it's not me, it's my family. And then of course, by the end, not only is he in, he's all the way in. The Godfather Part Two really does build off of that, but it doesn't just keep Michael as this kind of villainous character or someone who may have good intentions, but can't stop himself from taking out all of his enemies and killing people, even if it means it's his brother. We see the humanity fighting through. And you joked about Big Pacino. But those moments where he actually lets out his emotion, when he says in my house, you know, and he says to one of his heads of security, I want him alive, we see how angry he is. You know, this is a Michael who we've seen be completely still and be unaffected no matter how intense a situation is. And in that moment, when his wife and kids were almost killed along with him, we actually see the emotion that stirs in him. And then when you get to some of those scenes with his family, with Fredo, even though he knows it that moment where Fredo finally confirms that he did betray him and we see Michael sink, there is a level of emotion to this performance that is constantly reminding us that despite all the terrible things he's doing, all of the ways that he is distancing himself from the family, he seems to care so much about Kay and his kids. He, nevertheless, is still a figure who's trying to do the right thing. He is trying to keep both of his families together. And the costs of doing both of those things make it so that he's going to compromise at least one of them. But he senses that. You see that in Pacino's performance. You see that in his Michael, the toll it takes on him over the course of this film. And if it was just him being the, I knew it was you, Fredo, and I'm going to whack my own brother guy, there would be some fun in that. But it wouldn't take on the tragic proportions that this movie does. And this character wouldn't be in the running for greatest character in cinema history if it wasn't for the full scope of that arc. Can I offer a less sympathetic viewpoint on that, which is not to take away from anything regarding the performance and what you've said about the performance, because I think it all still works for this as well. But I see this less as a man whose humanity is still trying to claw its way back than a man who realizes slowly he's lost his humanity. And maybe that's semantics, but it's a little different. It's coming at it from a little different direction. And this connects with that idea of hypocrisy that I was kind of touching on, because I do think that both of these movies, they are not only critical favorites and end up on sight and sound lists, but these are huge popular hits. These are movies people watch together as families on Thanksgiving, right? And have traditions. And I think that's because we like to think that the Godfather films are about family, above all, that this is really a family story. And even Michael is a guy who has found himself in this situation, but because he values his family so much, he has to go to these lengths. I think part two, what stood out to me about it is that it very purposefully exposes the hypocrisy of that. And it does it very sneakily, because we're set up at the beginning, that party that he throws for his son, Anthony, I think, right? Anthony's first communion. The senator comes up and says to him in that tough meeting, I despise your masquerade, you know, and what does Puccino say? Say back, we're both part of the same hypocrisy. He's right, but never think it applies to my family. And that's where I think Michael Corleone and the film diverged is that understanding, because this whole family thing to me in watching this movie, and this relates to why I see it's Michael coming to the slow awareness of this, the whole family thing is a hypocrisy. It's a way for Michael to justify his own greed and his own power and retaining that power. Think about the fact that he puts Tom in charge of buying his son a Christmas present, right? Right. Think about the fact. Let's stick with Anthony here a minute. Consider this exchange with Anthony. When they're talking about this party, Michael says, did you like your party? Anthony says, I got lots of presents. Michael says, did you like them? And Anthony says, I don't know the people who gave them to me. That's not family. That's that party had nothing to do with family. It's about greed, status, and power. It's about what he thought he was turning away from at the beginning of the first film, but has completely succumbed to. And I think this is why Fredo is so key. Fredo is the proof of this. Why would you kill your brother if it's really about family? Sure, he's the goofball, but that that is the ultimate sentence in like, that's the choice. You make the choice. Do you want your status? Do you want your, your, your wealth? Do you want your power or do you want your family? Stop telling me it's about family when you're going to knock off Fredo. Yeah. And again, I'm making, I want to be clear. I would just want to be clear. I'm not saying the film is hypocritical. I'm saying the film is exposing Michael's hypocrisy and also the trajectory of the character to me is the slow, tragic awareness he comes to that he always claimed to like his family. And he doesn't not K, not Fredo, not his kids. This is Julian Edelman from Games with Names. You know, I always got something going on, lifting, chasing my kid or heading on a family road trip where I'm somehow both the snack guy and the DJ, but no matter what's going on in my schedule, one thing never changes. I make sure I stay hydrated. That's where liquid IV shows up clutch. We've said it before. It's the key to faster hydration. You got to have a liquid IV on you. Gym bag, glove box, the pantry you swear is organized, toss one in just a stick and 16 ounces of water hydrates you faster than water alone. Boom. Efficiency. It's powered by liquid IV hydro science. Sounds like a playbook term, but it's an optimized ratio of electrolytes, vitamins, and clinically tested nutrients, turning water into a game changer. Worried it tastes like science? Don't liquid IV hydration multiplier flavors are delicious. Lemon lime, popsicle firecracker and cotton candy, plus sugar free favorites like white peach and rainbow sherbet. That's a win. Tear, pour, enjoy. Even I can handle that. Go to liquidiv.com and use the promo code nut house for 20% off your first purchase. Spring weekends are all about enjoying the season together. Before everyone arrives, I stop by my local Total Wine & More to grab a great wine. They have so many to choose from and the lowest prices make it easy to grab an extra bottle for everyone. If you're not sure what to pick, their friendly guides can help. Find what you love and love what you find. Only at Total Wine & More. Curbside pickup and delivery available in most areas. Visit TotalWine.com to learn more. Spirits not sold in Virginia and North Carolina. Drink responsibly. B21. Support for the show comes from Public, the investing platform for those who take it seriously. On Public, you can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt from renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year. You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one-of-a-kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are like ETFs with infinite possibilities, completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com slash podcast and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash podcast. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors LLC, SEC registered advisor. Generated assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. Let's talk about modern home shopping. It's sort of become a fun side hobby, right? Scrolling listings at night, dreaming about kitchens you've never seen or backyards you haven't even stepped foot in, all from the comforts of pretty much anywhere. Redfin knows a lot of people like you want to own but are stuck in this browsing mode loop. That's where Redfin flips the script. With listings that update within minutes and tours you can book right from the Redfin app, you can see your dream home the moment it appears. Now liking a listing is easy but actually landing it, that's where Redfin comes in. Redfin has over 2,200 agents with local expertise and Redfin agents close twice as many deals as other agents. That means they want to help you win not just window shop. Redfin is built to help you go from just looking to wait. This could actually be home so become the newest neighbor on the block. Visit redfin.com to start finding and start owning. That's redfin.com. Yeah, I mean what you're describing is the reason why we talk about these films as Shakespearean and as Greek tragedies because that is the tragic irony of the character, that very contradiction that you're describing and no matter what your best intentions are or what you claim your best intentions to be, your actions actually suggest something else. That said, and I don't think we're really diverging from each other, I am reading it a little bit more charitably in terms of Michael because I think there is a difference in, to use your words, succumbing to the greed and power and there's even a difference in succumbing to something that you are ostensibly actually the cause of and actually wanting that. In other words, you not being part of some larger trajectory that you are somewhat powerless to totally avoid. I think that's, that's what we see to some extent in the Godfather part one, right, where he makes a choice ultimately. The choices are his to do what he does, but at the same time, what choice does he have? That's how he sees it. That's how his family even ultimately sees it. He's got to protect his father. He doesn't have a choice. If that means taking out some bad guys, a cop and a drug dealer, he's going to take him out because protecting his father is all he really cares about. If it means basically coming over to the dark side in that moment at the hospital, well, he's going to do it because he's going to do whatever he has to do to protect his father. I really do think that the hypocrisy you're describing and everything that makes that amazing like Tahoe sequence at the beginning so incredible is what supports what I'm arguing, which is that yes, he ultimately is in some ways a victim to the very thing he is propelling forward. And that is this goal of legitimacy. This goal at the end of the Godfather one, he says to Kay in five years will be totally legitimate. I do believe that Michael actually still wants that. I think the Michael we see in the Godfather two, but why does he want it? Well, I think he wants it because I give Michael the credit as a human being. Maybe this is where we diverge, Josh. I think that Michael Corleone still deep down wants to be happy with his family, that family is the thing he values most, but juggling the responsibilities of both families as he sees the responsibilities, as he sees the burden on him. That's not something he can actually navigate. But I do believe that he thinks it. I do believe he cares about, you know, yeah, of course, he's gone doing business. This is the point. And that means that Tom Hagan is going to buy his son a gift. But that doesn't mean he doesn't care about his son. I mean, that doesn't mean that it's what you do. It's not what you say. I mean, that's the proof is on the screen. But is the burden of all those other things, the weight on him to take care of the family business such we can have a little bit of sympathy for someone who I'm not saying necessarily you need to feel sympathetically about. He does things that make him a monster. But that contradiction, that hypocrisy are what really define this character and make him such a fascinating one. And I just want to go back and clarify where I was going with the Lake Tahoe sequence. He says we're going to be legitimate. And with that legitimacy comes this complete sort of refutation of your family heritage. We go from the Italian wedding at the beginning of the Godfather one to this completely impersonal nobody knows each other senators, all these people there just completely for appearances. The food being served, the food being served. They can't play Italian music. They play pop goes the weasel. They defy all that you've got that senator actually saying and I love that it's deliberate. I love that the movie makes it clear that his mispronunciation is deliberate. Yeah, he says, Vito, he says Vito Corleone. And later we hear him say Corleone perfectly fine. It is a reflection of his distaste for the family that even when he's putting on airs and he's acting like he's happy to be there, he's still going to get a little dig in on them. But it goes back to what I was saying during the Godfather one discussion and kind of tapping into sort of the 70s sensibility and sense of alienation, if you will, in this Vietnam era, where Michael says decay, you know, who's who's naive? Who's being naive? The US government really politicians are no different than the Corleone family. Well, we really see how true that is when we see the cost of that attempt at legitimacy. It actually is even more corrupt. The family only goes into a darker place and a more sinister place in this world where now they're actually closer to accomplishing the thing they always wanted the thing immigrants long for, which is actually being assimilated into culture. The more they get assimilated into this culture, the worse it gets. Well, and along those lines, how about the recurring use of the Statue of Liberty in the imagery? We talked about that with the first film here, that great image of a very young veto on the ship approaching. I think he's on the ship at this point, but he's looking out a window sees the Statue of Liberty, which is beautifully reflected in that window. So we get can I just add to this real quick, Josh? I'm sorry, because I think the moment you're talking about what's even better about it, he's not on the ship yet. The moment you're referring to is the reflection. He's actually in he's in that isolation cell. Yeah, that could be Ellis Island. So it's that isolation cell and that dichotomy of the land of freedom and opportunity. He's not there yet. There it is. It's right there. You could almost touch it. Yeah. He's stuck behind the barrier. Yeah, it's a great image. And we see the Statue of Liberty again in a much more throwaway subtle image, which is this is where Vito Older now has established himself as much as he can. A young man in New York City, and he goes to a musical performance. And there the backdrop of the production going on is this curtain. And you see the Statue of Liberty painted on there. So I just like how, you know, they're using this recurring motif to express that continual yearning of becoming legit, finding your place in this new place, and what the sacrifices that takes and the, you know, the moral and personal sacrifice it takes. So while we're talking imagery, you know, we kind of tagged on Gordon Willis cinematographer at the end of our conversation last time. Let's foreground him here. I'm wondering if there is a shot, a use of the camera, a use of lighting that is perhaps a favorite or one of your favorites from the film, the one, you know, you could maybe choose back to Ellis Island, that tracking shot along all of those faces, the waiting faces until we arrive at the young Vito. And you just think because of the expansiveness of both of these movies, how each of those faces holds a story as rich and layered of a family story is the one we're getting, right? I love the time the camera takes to, to let us actually look at each of those faces. But for me, the Gordon Willis shot is when Vito, De Niro's Vito now is waiting, lying in wait to kill Finucci, played by Gassler. That's just where I was going when he steps out of the darkness there in the hallway. The use of that hallway lamp, you know, and how Finucci Vito turns, takes out the lamp, the light bulb so that it's, it's dark in the hall. Finucci notices it, flicks it a little bit to get it to flash and it flashes on and off, cut to De Niro, hiding in the corner of the hallway, and he's exposed with each fat flash. And just how the, the use of lighting amps up the tension. Is he going to be seen? What's going to happen? And it's just, you know, I think, I think we can glamorize the violence and the killings in a lot of these movies in a way that maybe we should take a step back and consider. When is it being, you know, yeah, when is it being glamorized? And is that such a good thing? But there is also artistry at work in making each of these moments feel tense, suspenseful, dangerous, and morally conflicted. I think when it's presented with this much care and craft and technique, it gives you the time and space to think about what you're watching rather than a quick kill shot. And that's what the lighting in particular in this sequence does. So for me, that's the Gordon Willis shot. Yeah, I think it probably is for me too. And I think that it portends so much. And the other shot I'd mentioned is the, the one I interrupted you about. It's, it's seeing Vito looking at the Statue of Liberty through the glass. But when you think about that scene in the hallway, you're right, it could have been handled so many different ways. And it suggests that as stealthy, as smooth, as seemingly sort of uncaring, if you will, that Vito seems to be in terms of at least being able or being willing to carry out some of these tasks. In that moment, there's just enough hesitation and there's just enough kind of fear in De Niro's face that I think it, it suggests that he's willing to do it, obviously. He's planned to do it and he is going to do it. But it's something that he has not done before. And he knows that he's crossing a certain threshold when he does it, right? And it's all, it's all captured there just in that cinematography and in De Niro's performance. I'm thinking about all the supporting performances here, but especially John Cazale as Freyto and another touch I loved. And I'd love to know whether or not this was a Coppola staging thing, the production designer, whether it was a Cazale idea or just the alchemy of all of these different talents coming together. The scene that we get out at the house that leads to Freyto's death, where Michael confronts him. And Freyto explains how angry he is at Michael and how he's mad about being passed over. The fact that we see Cazale that entire time, the more agitated he gets, the angrier he gets, the more force he tries to exert. That is all completely hampered by the chair that he is sitting in. He's sitting in that kind of reclining chair where his entire body is sunk into it. And it just seems such a perfect encapsulation of who Freyto is that in this moment when he's trying to assert himself on the world and assert himself above his brother, he's still physically struggling. He's going against gravity, just trying to almost get up out of the chair. That moment is one I'd never really paid attention to, Josh. I don't know if it caught you as well, where he almost looks silly in a way Freyto usually kind of looks silly, but he's trying so hard to be so serious and to be so powerful. And all we can do is kind of shake our heads because he comes off as so ineffectual just by the way that he's sitting in that chair. Yeah, I mean, that's the wonder of Cazale's performance, right? Is that he somehow is pathetic, is completely out of place, completely incapable, yet somehow manages to capture our sympathy as well. And Freyto is really like the second most important character in this story, you could argue, I think, in terms of tracing some of these themes we've actually been talking about. Other supporting performances, I mean, Lee Strasberg, famed acting teachers, Hyman Roth, somehow the Miami mobster who is seems more in control and merciless than Michael with, but somehow at the same time being friendlier, that's the magic of that performance, right? Like you kind of know where you stand with Michael, even if he's saying a polite thing with Hyman Roth, you're just never quite sure, so slippery. And come on, we talked about Richard Castellano as Clemenza in the first film, how much we love that's relatively small supporting part. Okay, if you're going to cast a young Clemenza, get someone to do justice to Castellano's Clemenza, you got to get that right. And I don't know about you, but Bruno Kirby, who I had completely forgotten, have seen this film, you know, a couple of times, spent a long time, completely forgot that Kirby was the younger Clemenza. And he's great. He's so great. He's great. He's always got food in his mouth, and I'm pretty sure you actually watch him grow as the movie goes on. I really think you do. Because he's a lot, he's a smaller guy here than Clemenza grew up to be. But yeah, you completely buy them as one and the same. And you know, we talked a little bit, differed a little bit on Diane Keaton and the use of Kay in the first film. Oh, I've got a thought here. Yeah, I'd love to hear it. I think, you know, well, go ahead, tell me what you got. I think that you will appreciate this, though it would be ironic if you disagreed with me. You said that you felt in the Godfather one, the one thing maybe it was missing is just a little bit more Kay, we need to one more scene, maybe even one more scene where she wasn't with Michael just to a little bit more deeply understand that character you were. And I don't mean this in a flip way, essentially applying the Bechtel test to it, you know, sort of like give us a little bit more with that character. And I am not suggesting that another scene with Kay would have ruined the whole movie or wouldn't have made her character more interesting. But I also feel that movie is so perfectly constructed that I just don't know what an extra scene would do. I don't want to know what that scene is and what its function is before I'd be like, yeah, let's definitely give Kay more scenes. But in the Godfather part two, Josh, I really did feel the absence of one more K scene. And the reason is because we go so long between scenes with Kay. It's kind of like the Godfather one. And there's a long absence when Michael is dealing with business, basically, right? Or when he's off because of the family business he's hiding out in Italy. And I think even just like the Godfather one, we get one scene with her where she interacts with Tom Hagan. In Godfather one, she comes to try to see Michael, he says, he's not here, I don't know anything about him. And this one she tries to leave the compound with the kids. And he says, no, for your safety, you got to stay here, you can't. But otherwise, it goes basically from the scene at the beginning where they're almost killed and maybe something after that, him leaving and more or less the whole movie transpiring until we get near the end. And we get that big dramatic emotional reveal of her saying what happened to the baby that she lost. And even though I'm sure someone's going to argue this and I get it, even though we see enough kind of icy tension between them at the beginning, and then everything we see Michael doing in between shows us just how distanced he is from his family and how much humanity he seems to be losing. There still was an absence to me or a gap between where Kay and Michael are at the beginning of this film to then where she is when she is not only throwing in the towel on their marriage, but she's doing the most hurtful thing she could possibly do to him. I felt like I needed maybe just one more scene. And again, maybe even not another scene with Michael, but I needed to just a little bit better understand just how distanced and isolated she felt from him. And not only that, how how angry she really was towards him. I don't know that we get quite enough. Yeah. Well, I think that's maybe because in this film, she's actually more instrumental to how we feel about Michael than she was in the first film. You know, she was kind of, for lack of a better phrase, along for the ride in this family saga. And in this film, she is now officially really officially part of the family. So that might be it. I will say I did not, you know, go into this viewing with that at the top of my mind at all, like counting scenes of Kay or anything like that. I came out of it really feeling like Keaton made more of an impression on me, but still thinking like, yeah, she didn't get a ton of scenes, did she? In part two, either. But all that being said, she nails the scene she gets even more so. And that line reading of at this moment, I feel no love for you at all is just not only delivered perfectly in the context of those two people being together in that particular 10 seconds, but instructive of the entire arc for him and the film. And you know, so Keaton is like, so crucial to this. I also thought, you know, just talking about how her character is used in terms of some of the more formal elements, there is so much incisive editing going on in both of these films. And how about the cut from the sequence where the senator has been set up with the prostitute who is dead. And at this point, the senator is just standing or sitting distraught in the bedroom with the dead prostitute. And we cut to Kay pulling up at the estate. Both women absolutely used as props by these men, the senator and the prostitute, Michael and using Kay the same way. Obviously, more personally, at some point had more personal attachment, emotional attachment. But still, she has become essentially a prop, a symbol for what he wants the family to look like. Spring weekends are all about enjoying the season together. Before everyone arrives, I stopped by my local Total Wine & More to grab a great wine. They have so many to choose from, and the lowest prices make it easy to grab an extra bottle for everyone. If you're not sure what to pick, their friendly guides can help. Find what you love and love what you find. Only at Total Wine & More, curbside pickup and delivery available in most areas. Visit TotalWine.com to learn more. Spirits not sold in Virginia and North Carolina, drink responsibly B21. Let's talk about modern home shopping. It's sort of become a fun side hobby, right? Scrolling listings at night, dreaming about kitchens you've never seen, or backyards you haven't even stepped foot in, all from the comforts of pretty much anywhere. Redfin knows a lot of people like you want to own, but are stuck in this browsing mode loop. That's where Redfin flips the script. With listings that update within minutes, and tours you can book right from the Redfin app, you can see your dream home the moment it appears. Now liking a listing is easy, but actually landing it, that's where Redfin comes in. Redfin has over 2200 agents with local expertise. And Redfin agents close twice as many deals as other agents. That means they want to help you win, not just window shop. Redfin is built to help you go from just looking to wait, this could actually be home. So become the newest neighbor on the block. Visit Redfin.com to start finding and start owning. That's Redfin.com. This is Janna Kramer from Wine Down with Janna Kramer. Every Mother's Day I tell myself I'm going to be more thoughtful than flowers, because flowers are beautiful, but they don't last. In my house, everyone always ends up in the kitchen. Friends, family, the kids, and I love having things around that spark conversation and feel special. That's why I love the Lenox Spice Village and your mom will too. It's a set of 24 hand-painted little houses that are actually spice jars, and I swear people notice it the second they walk in. It's charming, it's nostalgic, and it somehow makes even everyday cooking feel a little more fun. And here's the best part, it actually gets used every day. Whether you're starting the full set or helping her complete one she's loved for years, there's a whole world of spice village to explore. This Mother's Day, give her something she'll treasure long after the card is put away. Trust me, once you see it, you'll want one too. Find the full collection at Lenox.com slash Spice Village. That scene with Tom and the senator also, of course, informs in hindsight the dialogue that the senator has with Michael, where he couldn't be more forceful with Michael and act like he has the upper hand, and yet Michael seems completely unfazed by it and throws it back at him and says that he's expecting him to put up the gaming license money himself. It's totally absurd, and of course only then later do you understand why Michael has that confidence, because he knows something that the senator doesn't, which is that his brother runs that brothel that he frequents, and he's going to have a way to expose his hypocrisy. He is going to be able to take advantage of his frailties and his vices. So as terrible as that scene is, thinking about how willing they are to use that sex worker in that way, basically as a prop, as a means to their end, it is one that makes us understand what Michael is willing to do and again why he's so confident early in that conversation with him. I even love, and this is a movie that just is full of these types of moments that Godfather is to, the moment where the senator rejects what Michael says. That line we were talking about where he says, don't think it ever extends to my family, and it feels such a major pronouncement in Michael's being so serious and thoughtful, and the senator basically just says, yeah, yeah, whatever. And the way that actor, we got to look it up so I make sure we give him credit, he's so good here. The way he dismisses that is such fun, and it reminds me of what might be my other favorite gesture in this film. I can't even fully explain it when movie moments like this just do something to you and kind of make you giggle, but the sequence near the end where the landlord figures out who Vito is, and he comes in to the olive oil shop and he's talking to him, and he says, she can stay, and I think Vito kind of smiles, Nero kind of smiles, and then he says, and I'm going to lower the rent, $5, and Vito just kind of leans back in his chair and looks at the other guy. He just looks at him, he doesn't do anything but just look at him. It's such a deniro movement. Oh, it's such a deniro move, and that's enough for the landlord to go $10. He just needs to see him react like that, not even to him directly, and he's like, okay, I'll give you more. This movie has so many of those just wonderful acting touches in it. That's the dangerousness of deniro that's just right there under the skin that I was talking about. I looked it up where you're talking, Senator Pat Geary played by G.D. Spradlin, and he is indeed so good. Another throwaway gesture like that, not funny, but touching. Actually, I found involving deniro's Vito is after he has been working at this point at a grocers, and deniro gets fired because Fnuchy comes in and lays the pressure on the grocers and says, I think it's like hire my nephew or something like that, you know, and fire this guy. And deniro takes it, you know, calm, walks out the door, and the grocers chases him down the street with a box of food to give to his family. And just kind of, it just kind of counters the sense of, I don't know, you know, I know these films at the time got some pushback from Italian Americans about the depiction of what that meant to be someone from Italy in the U.S. And are we kind of relying on stereotypes here? And I think a little gesture like that speaks to the goodness of an ethnic community that could still be independent of all this crime and killing and that sort of stuff. So that was kind of like a throwaway moment that I really did appreciate. Can I throw one thing at you before we kind of wrap up here that did strike me kind of a kind of like a new, not revelation, but just a new thought in revisiting this go back going back to how we started our conversation about the Godfather. But it was really interesting to watch the Godfather part two. Now that we are more than ever a wash in a landscape cinematic landscape of sequels and reheats and rehashes and legacy quills and whatever you want to call them, because that's what the Godfather part two was, right? And it made me think about how does the Godfather part two fit within fanboy culture? And I do not mean at all to put this on the same level of something like the MCU or Star Wars, but it did occur to me that this movie is kind of functioning for fans, somewhat in the same way that fans of those franchises watch them. It's a sequel that knows exactly what its audience wants. And it gives them that. I already alluded to this in the when I talked about how it does feed us that it's all about the family at the beginning before to my mind subverting that this is a movie full of Easter eggs and callbacks. I noticed for the first time Nina wrote us theme being played on the church organ during Michael's son's first communion in 58. There's no like there's no reason that would happen in that church ceremony. But that's what you get. And of course, that's for the fans to geek out on that. How about De Niro's veto in one of the flashback sequences buying oranges on the street, right? Yeah, and real quick, there's a bunch of oranges in this film, just like the oranges mean death a couple times in the Godfather part one. Johnny Ola comes in with oranges at the beginning of the film. Johnny Ola, there you go, is Hyman Roth's representative. And they're of course going to try to kill Michael Don Fannucci buys oranges just before he is killed. There's at least one more orange reference in the Godfather part two. And then you get callbacks, of course, like, you know, Michael saying, I'll make him an offer he can't refuse. Like this is this is what was made me kind of laugh a little bit is this is all the sort of stuff that fans would eat up. But some critics would kind of point to nowadays and say, and what they'd call a fan service, right? So it's it's a sequel full of fan service. Again, don't mean to put these two. Yeah, these two things on the same level. But it was just interesting to watch the movies function in somewhat similar ways. Sure. I mean, Coppola uses some of the same techniques and they are callbacks. You're absolutely right. There's a bunch of them. And I did note all of the ones that I saw. I'll mention a few, even just the cross cutting of the gunshots when Vito kills Don Fannucci, of course, corresponding with this parade festival that's going on in the streets, which mirrors the baptism sequence at the end of the Godfather part one and the cross cutting there, the baptism being equal to that in terms of the family really starting in some ways, the the reign of Vito Corleone starting in that moment when he kills Don Fannucci and the reign of Michael Corleone starting his part of the family business starting in that moment during the baptism. How about the fact? And we've already touched on this. The movie opens with this big family sequence, the first communion mirroring the wedding at the beginning, though very different assassinations ending both of the films and the use of doors that shot. And I think I alluded in our Godfather one discussion to the moment in the Godfather two where it's an even more famous door closing. But that final shot of the Godfather one K outside the office and the door closing and the new Michael forming in that moment, him officially taking over as the Don and that distance between them in the Godfather part two, that door close on her when she comes back when she's visiting the kids. We not only get that, but there's a moment earlier in the movie where Vito gets exposed to kind of his first moment of crime, I think, and it's when Clemenza knocks on his window. Isn't it Clemenza who says you're the guns, he gives them the guns, these guns he gives them the sack. I'm pretty sure it's the moment where De Niro either in that exact scene or later with Clemenza, I think it's there though, he takes it and he goes into the bathroom and he closes the door while his wife is in the kitchen. He leaves her out while he closes the door so he can do business. He can see what's in that bag. You're right, there are a ton of touches and kind of throwbacks or callbacks to the first film. I kind of love how this movie ends to where it actually almost in like a memento type fashion. The last scene of this movie feels like it could have been in some ways, not literally, but chronologically, yes, it's the beginning of the Godfather I. That family sit down where they're about to honor Pop on his birthday and Michael's about to reveal that he's going off to fight in the war, that he enlisted. Think back to the Godfather I, starting just after he's come back from the war and it ending, the Godfather part two ending exactly where the Godfather I eventually would pick up. Two other just quick things that I've gotten my notes that I appreciated this time or that stood out to me. Hyman Roth, like King Lear, talking about dividing up his kingdom as he's carving up pieces of the cake, carving up Cuba. Also, Michael talking with Tom earlier in the film and saying that the loyalty of all the men that work for the family extends as far as business. They're just businessmen like anybody else. And how that actually informs his understanding of the rebels in Cuba, right? The rebels aren't businessmen. The rebels, they're in it because they actually care. They mean it, right? So, it's not about being bought. They can't be bought. They're willing to die for their cause. Yeah. And going back quickly to the final scene, you know, with Michael announcing he's going to enlist, that's why I do still feel sympathy for him. We made Diverge a little bit in a reading of how the movie presents him overall. But I would agree, you never lose that sympathy. And I don't think the movie wants you to. And that's proof of it, that that's where we end, where we see who Michael was before this whole incredible tragic journey began. And we could spend an entire podcast and do another 50 minutes, probably, on the Frank Pantangeli character. And some of the questions that still exist to this day around some motivations and whether or not all the plotting is completely sound in this movie, I'll just say for now that I think Michael V. Gatzel is brilliant as Franky Pantangeli. I think every supporting performer in this film is pretty amazing. And three of them did get Oscar nominations. De Niro won it. De Niro, Gatzel, and Strasburg for Hyman Roth. Fredo, John Cazale somehow left off of that. And of course, infamously, Al Pacino, despite this performance as Michael Corleone losing to Art Carney in the best actor race in 75. Yeah, I mean, can't speak to Art Carney, but that does seem pretty ridiculous. And just to put this in the context of, you know, De Niro's career, which most people already know, but you're looking at just before this, a year before this Mean Streets. And before that, you know, pretty minor stuff. I mean, bang the drum slowly, also in 73 with Mean Streets, the gang that couldn't shoot straight in 71. But I mean, talk about a presence, talk about an energy fully formed, if not an actor, but an energy fully formed to come on and take a role like this and just hold it so fully. Absolutely incredible. It is. The Godfather part two, a movie I want to go rewatch right now. It's not too late. Is it, Josh? It's only three hours of 20 minutes. I mean, feels like an hour and 20 minutes. It depends. Hey, that goes back to what we talked about with the first film, you know, the patience and how it's a different way of using your running time than the two and a half plus hour movies. Mostly we seem to be getting these days. Well, that's where we're going to end it. We would love to hear from you on the Godfather part two, including maybe your answer for us definitively. Do you have a favorite? Do you have a preference? Is the Godfather part two, the movie that a lot of people think it is? I heard a little bit of the rewatchables podcast they did on the Godfather part two. Now, it was in fairness for people talking, but Josh, their discussion of the Godfather part two and no, I did not listen to most of it, is two and a half hours. So our 55 minute review of the Godfather kind of pales in comparison to that two and a half hour conversation. But all four of the commentators start off by saying that the Godfather part two is not only the better Godfather film and they love the first Godfather film. It's the best film ever made. They all four, I believe, feel that way. And they basically say that it's just riskier. It's more complex. And the shorthand is kind of, you know, the Godfather's a perfectly constructed pop song. And the Godfather part two is the jazz odyssey or the opera. It's just deeper and and maybe a little bit more confusing, but also more emotionally complex or resonant. That's the the conventional wisdom on the Godfather two. And I think I always held it until I watched the movies back to back, but we don't want to go there. No, no, I mean, as I said, I'm not going to. But I will say didn't listen to that episode, respect that show. But if you've got four people and they all pick Godfather part two is the best film of all time, you got to shake up your panel a little bit there, boys. You know what? Sometimes when you're right, you're right. It's it's it is that good. It needs to be thought of in those terms, Josh. But we don't disagree about the Godfather part two. Maybe I'm just a little more emphatic in my love. I mean, I don't know how you're measuring that, but sure, I'm measuring it. You didn't put either in your sight and sound top 10 and I put the Godfather part one in my sight. That's true. That's fair. Yeah, if I'm remembering, do I have either in my top 20? I don't know. We'll have to research. We'll save that for another time. You've won. You want to wipe everybody out? I don't feel I have to wipe everybody out. Just my enemies. I will confess, I didn't re listen to this review. I feel like I might have come out somewhere saying that I ultimately feel like you have to go with the Godfather one because it's the original if you're forced to choose between the two. But historically, I've always said, Josh, that I think the Godfather part two is maybe the better film. I don't know how you choose between the two of them. They're both so good. It's you can't bring it up now. We're on the record. We just have to let that be. Okay, I'll let it be. Hope you enjoyed that conversation and will remind you that access to the film spotting archive is just one of the benefits of joining the film spotting family. You can learn about those benefits at filmspottingfamily.com. Thanks for listening. This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye. Spring weekends are my favorite. The grill is fired up and we gather around the patio table. Before everyone arrives, I stopped by my local Total Wine and More to pick up a few bottles of wine. With such a wide selection, it's easy to find something for everyone to enjoy. If you're not sure what to pick, their team can help you find what you love and love what you find, only at Total Wine and More curbside pickup and delivery available in most areas. Visit TotalWine.com to learn more. Spirits not sold in Virginia and North Carolina. Drink responsibly. Be 21. Experience vibrant senior living with award-winning services at Brightview senior living communities. At Brightview, our residents enjoy resorts style amenities, daily programs, exciting social and cultural events, and delicious chef-prepared meals. But that's not all. Brightview residents also enjoy complementary transportation, safety, security, and high quality care if needed. Brightview senior living communities. Learn more about the possibilities at Brightview senior living.com. It never happens at a good time. The pipe bursts at midnight. The heater quits on the coldest night. Suddenly, you're overwhelmed. That's when home service here. For $4.99 a month, you're never alone. Just call their 24-7 hotline and a local pro is on the way. Trusted by millions, home serve delivers peace of mind when you need it most. For plans starting at just $4.99 a month, go to homeserve.com. That's homeserve.com. Not available everywhere. Most plans range between $4.99 to $11.99 a month your first year. Terms apply on covered repairs. You know the fastest way to ruin a great adventure? Getting dehydrated? For real. That's why you always got a plan ahead with some liquid IV hydration multiplier. Veteran move. You're basically your own hydration coach at that point. Just one stick and 16 ounces of water hydrates you faster than water alone. Boom! Back in the game, hydration multiplier powered by liquid IV hydro science, which is fancy talk for a smart science backed mix of electrolytes and essential vitamins doing the dirty work to keep you going strong. Go to liquidiv.com and use the code nuthouse or 20% off your first purchase.