The Shit No One Tells You About Writing

How to Make Agents Curious While Also Impressing Them With Your Line Level Writing

48 min
Feb 12, 20262 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

Literary agents Cece Lira and Carly Waters provide detailed feedback on author Sarah Miller Adams' query letter and opening pages for her novel 'Bilateral Breathing,' a multi-POV literary fiction about three mid-career women physicians. The discussion covers query letter structure, character introduction strategies, opening scene execution, and the balance between internal and external narrative tension in literary fiction.

Insights
  • Multi-POV query letters require establishing a unified through-line or container (setting, goal, obstacle) that connects protagonists rather than introducing them separately, which risks making them feel like disconnected characters
  • Query letters should show specificity and causality between plot points rather than listing events; vague plot descriptions fail to create curiosity or emotional investment in agents
  • Literary fiction openings can start slowly but must balance internal tumultuous interiority with compelling external scenes; soft external openings against rich internal worlds can undermine propulsive storytelling
  • Author voice and vision should be protected even when feedback suggests changes; agents recognize strong authorial intent and specificity as markers of publishable work worth championing
  • Query letter descriptions of writing style (prose rhythm, sentence structure, narrative technique) should be experienced by agents through pages rather than explained, as description removes the magic of discovery
Trends
Upmarket literary fiction increasingly requires clear positioning (commercial vs. literary lean) rather than hedging between categories in query lettersMulti-POV narratives in women's fiction are gaining traction but require stronger structural clarity around why multiple perspectives are essential to the storyRural healthcare settings and small-town dynamics are emerging as compelling backdrops for character-driven literary fiction exploring systemic pressuresEmbodied fiction and somatic narrative techniques are becoming more prevalent in literary submissions, requiring agents to understand body-centered storytelling approachesQuery letter feedback emphasizes specificity over thematic abstraction; agents want concrete plot details and character dynamics, not philosophical descriptions of what the work exploresPower dynamics and tension in opening scenes are increasingly valued as markers of compelling literary fiction, even in character-driven narrativesSensitivity readers and authenticity consultants are becoming standard practice for fiction featuring professions or experiences outside authors' lived experience
Topics
Query Letter Structure for Multi-POV NarrativesCharacter Introduction Strategies in Query LettersOpening Scene Construction in Literary FictionInternal vs. External Narrative TensionProse Style and Sentence Structure in Literary FictionUpmarket vs. Literary Fiction PositioningEmbodied Fiction and Somatic Narrative TechniquesRural Healthcare as Setting and ThemeWomen's Relationships and Friendship Dynamics in FictionPower Dynamics in Opening ScenesSpecificity vs. Abstraction in Plot DescriptionAuthor Voice and Authorial IntentComparative Comps in Query LettersSensitivity Reading and Authenticity ConsultationPacing and Rhythm in Literary Prose
Companies
Wendy Sherman Associates
Literary agency where Cece Lira works as an agent providing feedback on query letters and manuscripts
PS Literary Agency
Literary agency where Carly Waters works as an agent; she provides editorial feedback on query and pages
Rosetta Stone
Language learning platform featured as sponsor offering immersive language instruction for travelers
People
Bianca Marais
Best-selling author and co-host of 'The Shit No One Tells You About Writing' podcast providing editorial feedback
Cece Lira
Literary agent at Wendy Sherman Associates providing detailed feedback on query letter and manuscript pages
Carly Waters
Literary agent at PS Literary Agency providing editorial feedback on query structure and opening pages
Sarah Miller Adams
Author of 'Bilateral Breathing' receiving comprehensive feedback on query letter and opening manuscript pages
Elizabeth Strout
Literary author cited as comparable comp for character-driven depth and emotional clarity in query letter
Annabelle Monaghan
Literary author cited as comp for accessibility and readability in query letter comps
Alicia Fox
Literary author cited as comp for emotional clarity in query letter comparables
Quotes
"Your job is not to write for me. Your job is to write for your readership, you know, and you know your readers taste."
Cece LiraClosing feedback on author vision
"The quiet cost of care is such a beautiful way to put it that I'm like, can we find a way to keep just that part because it's so good."
Cece LiraAuthor bio feedback
"I really want to know because when a story has three strong women, relationships between women, stories that depict relationships between women, whether that's mother, daughter, sisters, best friends. These are some of my favorite stories."
Cece LiraMulti-POV narrative discussion
"What we want to do in a query letter is up the curiosity because you might have an explanation for every single line here. And I believe that you do, but readers aren't going to talk to you to figure out what the explanation is."
Cece LiraQuery letter feedback
"Bilateral breathing is a medical term, and it's also a swimming term. And once you read the pages, it becomes very clear. It's also in the novel in a moment of what bilateral breathing is."
Sarah Miller AdamsTitle defense
Full Transcript
Hi there and welcome to our show, the shit no one tells you about writing. I'm best-selling author Bianca Marais and I'm joined by Cece Lira of Wendy Sherman Associates and Carly Waters of PS Literary. Hi everyone, welcome back to another Books with Hooks segment. Today we're super excited because we have the author joining us on the show, and we always love when that happens. But today especially, we are joined by Sarah Miller Adams. Sarah, welcome to the show. Thanks. Glad to be here. It's kind of cool, kind of terrifying, but great. It's amazing to have you here. Okay, so we are going to kick things off immediately, and we're going to ask Sarah to please read her query letter. All right. Dear Canadian Trio, the shit no one tells you about writing has been my MFA, my accountability system, and the reason I flinch when anyone says stakes. Carla keeps me grounded, Cece pushes me deeper, and Bianca keeps me from burning pages at 2 a.m. Sending bilateral breathing with your voices in my ear feels right. If it sparks a CNC duel, I'll make popcorn. Three mid-career women in medicine gave everything to their work. Now they must reclaim what it costs them. Their purpose, their power, and a life still worth living. Bilateral Breathing, 77,000 Words, is an upmarket, literary-leaning embodied fiction novel owned in rotating close third-person POVs. It moves like a body under stress, short, staccato, rhythmic sentences, blending Alicia Fox emotional clarity with Annabelle Monaghan's intimacy and the character-driven depth of Elizabeth Stroud. Dr. Eve Miller, 54, facing menopause and professional exile after resident patient mishap she did not cause, is shoved from the family medicine teaching clinic she built. Dr. Hannah English, 39, an OBGYN, longs for a life beyond surgical control and the ache of infertility her work will not let her outrun. Janet Fitzgerald, 51, a nurse practitioner with a background in social work silenced by failing marriage, fights to reclaim the voice she lost keeping everything together. Eve reluctantly joins best friends Hannah and Janet in reopening in a shuttered rural Alabama clinic through a new rural medicine initiative. In Whitehall, the town's widowed sheriff, Danny King, becomes an unexpected steadiness for the three women. A norovirus outbreak and a life flight obstetric emergency define their early months. Each crisis tightens their bond and tests their skill. When a hornet attack nearly kills Danny, it detonates everything they have kept contained. As the year unfolds, the three grow closer, bound by a friendship forged under everything they have survived. However, when a betrayal and an unexpected pregnancy fracture the trio, each woman is forced to live without the comfort of the unit that once held them together. They must decide whether they are in Whitehall to heal what medicine broke, a return to the university that broke them. I am a playwright turned novelist based in Alabama. I do not write as a clinician. I write from the South I live in, shaped by decades-long physician friendships and my own experience with infertility. My work centers emotional truth, sharp observation, and the quiet costs of care. Thank you so much, Sarah. I think we can all agree that Sarah has got the best voice we've ever heard on this podcast, and the rest of us would happily swap out ours for the dulcet tones of hers. Right. Okay. So Carly, we are going to hand it across to you. Can you please kick us off there? Yeah. I can't remember if we said this off the top, but 334 words was the query letter. Obviously there's a lovely little introduction and we're so glad to have you on the show, Sarah. As I say every time, it's my favorite day of the month when we get to have the authors on. So I'm so glad. Okay. I usually start at the top. So, okay. So title, this feels a little bit clinical to me, right? Like bilateral, you know, I honestly, I'd be like, what does that mean? Like by half lateral either side. So I'm like half and half breathing, but then there's like a trio of POVs. So then I'm like, well, bi means two. Again, you can correct me. Anybody listen to this, you know, it's more about science than me, but bi in my mind means two, but then there's three POVs. So I don't know. I just feel like there's a number of ways that maybe the title isn't working as well as it can. Also sounds a bit nonfiction, right? A little bit clinical. So I think I like the breathing part. So I would do a, like the blankety blank of breathing, like, you know, that type of title, if we're going more on market. So I play around with that a little bit. Okay. So one of my big things that I always say with multi POV stories is how are these stories united as opposed to three women living a life? Because the way that you presented it suggests that there is a reason that these women are telling their stories alongside each other but you also introduce them very separately and so I would like it if we started with the reason that they are all together or the implosion like a hook that alludes to the implosion that's going to happen or again like the reason that they're all brought together under this storyline that's something I think that's that's definitely missing here because to me they just sound like co-workers that don't really know each other and then we get to the point where they're their best friend I don't find out they're best friends till till paragraph one, two, three, four, five, six, right? And so, yeah, I just would have loved to know maybe what it was that brought them together as best friends and or the implosion of why we're telling the story between these POVs. I would also say that this is probably literary. You give us Comps, Alicia Fack, Annabelle Monaghan, and Elizabeth Strout. So I would probably say we need to cut the Annabelle Monaghan, who we love, of course, but in terms of the applicability to this story, I would probably stick with the literary comps, in my opinion. And they're also, yeah, just three very, very different writers. Okay, and then the technicality of introducing the characters. So you say Dr. Eve Miller, 54, Dr. Hannah English, 39, Janet Fitzgerald, 51. So that's a much more of a synopsis style introduction of characters. I don't know how much we need to point out their ages, unless you feel like, I don't know, we can't understand the story without it. We all, cause you say earlier on, there are three mid-career women. So we can assume that mid-career is within this range. So I don't think we have to name their ages in that sense. So that I think that we can probably part with that. The other thing is it does sound like a lot of kind of like set up and backstory, right? So, you know, we say Dr. Eve Miller facing menopause, professional exile after a resident patient mishap she did not cause. It's shown from the family medicine teaching clinic she built. I'm not clear if that happens like before we meet her on the page or whether that is the plot of the book. Same with all three of their introductions. So again, I would want to know what is happening in the story currently versus more importantly than what happened before. Or if you think that we have to know that about them, again, I would find a way to weave that into the connection between the three women. Yeah, so all of it's super interesting. All to say this sounds great. It sounds super interesting. Sounds like a book, but I'm just not clear on like what is actually the plot now versus what is the setup beforehand. Okay, I want to go to the last paragraph. So you're a lovely author bio paragraph. So you talk about your decades long physician friendships, I think maybe you should name whether they've read it like as sensitivity readers of sort, because you just say, obviously, it was like shaped by your friendships, and your own experience with infertility. But sometimes if you know, these three characters are that much outside your lived experience, you might just want to make it like, you know, and you know, so and so OBGYN read this and you know, just find a way to kind of allude to the fact that like they did a sensitivity read. Obviously some of this is from your own experience, which is great. But if you're going to mention the friendships and the fact that you're not a doctor, you might just want to allude to that piece there. And then the last line, my work centers on emotional truths are observations and the quiet costs of care, which is great. I would say the query's job and the plot's job is to show that instead of tell that. So I'd probably just cut that line and then buy some of the tips that I gave you. You'll probably be able to show that through the plot. But sounds really interesting and good job. And I'll turn that over to the other two. Okay, Cece, we're going to hand it across to you now. Something that I'm always fascinated by in terms of the query letters when they are multi POV characters is that I know a lot of the times we say focus on the main, main character in the query letter and allude to the others. And I know, Cece, you've said before, you don't have to say what kind of POV it's written in. So let's hear how that all comes together over here in terms of Cece's advice. I'm so glad you're here with us, Sarah. I need to say that first and foremost. Okay. So from the top, you're calling this upmarket literary leaning. I am a firm believer that all upmarket stories, they either skew commercial or literary. They're still upmarket, but there's always a tiny, tiny bit of like a extra little sea salt on top. And that sea salt can be literary or commercial. And it's really good for you to know like where you stand if you write upmarket, whether the you is Sarah or anyone else. But I don't think you have to say that in the query letter because I feel like it could give the impression to the agent that you're like not sure how to position this. So I would call it one thing. When I read the query letter, I actually thought to myself, I'm going to tell Sarah to call it upmarket. But then when I read the pages, I was like, I'm going to tell Sarah to call it literary because your writing is very literary. But you know, we'll get to that when we get to the pages. But really my advice is pick one, pick whichever one you feel best represents your story. I also, again, love the self-awareness that you know what your writing sounds like. You call this, you refer to your own writing as a body moving under stress, short, staccato, rhythmic sentences. And again, the self-awareness is spot on because I've read your pages now and that is a very accurate description. I don't think we need information on that in the query letter though. Like I will find out once I scroll down and read the pages by I mean any agent, you don't need to promise us what the writing is going to sound like. It's one of those things where it's best experience as opposed to described. It's almost like it removes some of the magic when you describe it. And this is really interesting to me because I'm such a like writing forward person. So you would think that CC would want to know what the writing sounds like, but I think I want to like find out as opposed to be told. It's an interesting discussion, I think. You know, like should writers share info in their query letter about the quality of the writing? And by quality, I don't mean like high quality, low quality. I mean the type of writing. And I think, I think no. Okay. Let's talk of a plot paragraph. The fact that you're doing, you know, Dr. Eve Miller, 54, Dr. Hannah English, 39, Janet Fitzgerald, 51. And then you're getting to the story. It's almost like you have two different beginnings in your query letter. and I'm not sure I liked that. I would prefer to all be baked into like one really strong plot paragraph or a couple of plot paragraphs. I also wondered, and this is such a minor thing, but you know how my brain works. Like with Dr. Eve Miller, you're saying that she is facing menopause and professional exile. And then in the next clause, you say she's shoved from the family medicine clinic. And I'm like, isn't that the same as exiled, like being shoved from and experiencing professional exile. So I'm just wondering if you're like saying the same thing twice. But after reading those first three lines, the lines that share their internal struggles, I will be very real with you. I felt empathy for them. I didn't feel curious. And I suspect it's because all the information was internal. You know, we learned that one of them longs for a life beyond surgical control and the other one wants to reclaim her voice. And that's like very zoomed out, very internal. And there's no specificity for my mind, for my brain to attach itself to. And that specificity not being there makes me go, huh. And then I was like, great, because we have the plot paragraph and that's going to have specificity. And we both do and we don So here what I know about the story from the plot paragraphs not the backstory Okay Here what I know about the story the present day timeline There are three doctors and they're also friends. They reopen a rural Alabama clinic. There is a sheriff. There is a neurovirus outbreak. There is an obstetric emergency. There is a hornet attack and there is a betrayal. Oh, there's also an unexpected pregnancy. Notice how I shared all these plot points in a way that did not show causality between them. We didn't have that dominoes tipping over, you know, one thing led to another effect. We also didn't have, this is even more important, attachment to each protagonist. Like we find out about the sheriff who gets a name on the query letter. And I'm like, is there a love interest with the sheriff? Is the sheriff helping them? you know they're getting death threats the sheriff is helping like figure out who's sending them death threats and and even the plot points which are in and of themselves quite interesting you know when a pandemic it's not quite a pandemic but like a big virus outbreak and a big emergency and the betrayal like I love stories that have betrayal and sacrifice I feel like that's that's the ingredients to every great story but these are all very like zoomed out things I don't know what that means. I don't know what detonates everything they have kept contained means. I don't know what the betrayal is. And so right now your plot points are not specific enough, and they're not connected to each protagonist in a way that indicates causality. And I thought to myself, I really want to know because when a story has three strong women, relationships between women, stories that depict relationships between women, whether that's mother, daughter, sisters, best friends. These are some of my favorite stories because I'm obsessed with relationship between women. Like I just find it to be so interesting because women's inner lives are so interesting. So I really wanted more on that. I will respectfully disagree with Carly about the last line, because I have to tell you when I got to the author paragraph, like in theory, I agree, we don't need to be told themes or what your work is doing. Your plot paragraph should do that. But the quiet cost of care is such a beautiful way to put it that I'm like, can we find a way to keep just that part because it's so good. And I think that every woman picking up this book and like taking a look at the jacket copy would go, oh my God, that's me. I experienced the quiet cost of care, high cost, but quiet. You know, we talk about invisible labor a lot, but we don't necessarily, like I've never seen it framed in that way. And I thought it was beautiful. Thank you, Cece. Okay, Sarah, we're going to hand it across to you now. You can either answer some For the questions I've had, or you can pose questions of your own, let's unpack it. Okay. Carly, love you, but we're fighting over the title. Bilateral breathing is a medical term, and it's also a swimming term. And once you read the pages, it becomes very clear. It's also in the novel in a moment of what bilateral breathing is. I understand what you're saying, but it's twofold. It's medicine and swimming and balance. That's the biggest thing, balance. Bilateral breathing, you can't breathe with just one lung. I mean, you can, but you have to have balance in your life, in breathing, in everything. The easiest way to describe the, you know, and I just kind of made some notes, And the three women is an overarching thing for Carly is, yes, we have Eve as the main spine, but it is an isosceles triangle. And I will use this as an example with you guys. Bianca is the engine of the podcast, and you and Cece are the transmission and wheels. You're not moving without all three of you, but Bianca holds the podcast together. So like an isosceles triangle, if one side disappears or both sides disappear, you just become a line. It may be a great line, but it's still just a line. So you've got to have that. That's why they're, and I know that you've made it very clear that I have not made it clear how the three of them interact. But without them, she can't survive her story. And without her, they can't survive their story. So it is all meshed together, you know, as an engine. And then literary, the issue, and you saw it, or we'll discuss it in the pages, is the Shafak, Strout, and Monaghan is, there is a little sprinkling of each one. It's not just me focusing on Shavok. It's not me just focusing on Strout, like all of Kittredge. It's Monaghan's, you know, Monaghan makes everything very easy to digest. I'm bridging the river between all three of them. And so that's answering that question. And then I'll go back to CC. Embodied fiction is a thing. And that's why I put it, let me scroll back up, because I wanted to say it moves like a body under stress. Because a lot of people don't understand embodied fiction. They may know it from psychology, but I'm coming from a theater background where embodied fiction is the way you do it. And I walk through life like that. That's the way I think and the way I do, for the lack of a better word. So that's why I felt like I had to explain the embodied fiction, especially for somebody that may be like, it's the shit podcast, so I can say it. What the hell does that mean? but again taking the close third person out I get that too but and the introducing each character and this goes to Cece and Carly I understand that maybe I overframed it underframed it whatever but each one of them has a reason in this story it's not just a jumble so that's where I was going through that and of course I understand what Cece's saying about zooming out too far But again, you know, 400 words or less, how do you do that? Yeah. Okay. I want to hop in. So, okay. I guess I'll ask a question first. When do they reopen this shuttered rural Alabama clinic? Is this like an inciting incident? Yes, but it is, but they have to, we have to see the life and then it, because it's the pressure, pressure, pressure. Then once they moved to Whitehall, everything just kind of, you know, everything they've built. because medicine is all containment. It's the way you speak and move through the world. It's, it's a way that you're trained to hold your emotions down. So we have to see that first and then blow it up. So what percentage into the book would you say that they open this clinic? I think it's chapter five. Okay. So I'm going to posit a theory of speaking containers, like about how we can maybe frame this, I would maybe suggest that, and again, it's your book, correct me if I'm wrong, but this clinic almost is a character or this clinic is going to be a main setting. This clinic is a main identity for the women and the book based on the way that everything's going to happen within it. So I'm thinking if you feel like these women's three storylines are running parallel, obviously there's some intersection. I'm wondering if the through line here can be the clinic. And maybe you can introduce the clinic as, you know, this organism or this type of character as a setting that could maybe help you frame this a little bit. Would that be helpful? Maybe, but also it's the town because, you know, they're, they're coming from, you know, big city and they're going to a town that really doesn't want them because they're outsiders and all the, all the good stuff. So it is the town and the clinic. It's the, the clinic is what contains them because that's medicine they can operate on autopilot. It's all the other things. It's meeting Danny. It's him unsettling all three spotlines and so forth. But yes, that makes sense of working in the clinic. Yeah. Cece, did you just say the town doesn't want them? It is implied. Some of the town, because they don't have the hospital closed and they don't have healthcare. If you know anything about rural medicine, it's a nightmare. It really, truly is. You drive an hour to see someone. I'm just going to interrupt you for a second. Sure. Go ahead. That's not the point. The point is, if the town doesn't want them, that's excellent. And you have to make that clear in the query letter because it ups the stakes. It ups the tension. These are three women, unwanted, who are up against the town who doesn't want them there. Like that's, that to me could tie the domino effects, could help tie the domino effects. So that's that, when you said that my eyes went, you know, cause I'm like, Ooh, outsiders, Ooh, up against the town doesn't want them, you know, like, especially with healthcare, which is such a hot topic that's so divisive. And that includes so many things, you know, that's juicy. What we want to do in a query letter is up the curiosity because you might have an explanation for every single line here. And I believe that you do, but readers aren't going to talk to you to figure out what the explanation is. Readers are going to read it and go, I'm curious or I'm not. And so if you have these elements, highlight them. So is the common goal that these women are then trying to bring healthcare to this rural town who has an absence of healthcare? I mean, that's the sidecar. It's the frame in which they reckon all of their stuff. Yeah, because I think you just need a container. You need a vehicle. So I'm thinking you either have to, as Cece would say, expand on the fact that these three women coming together, trying to bring some health care. there's a lot of tension in the town, which as Cece pointed out was great. That's just a way to kind of explain why these three women, why now? Because I just don't think we're at the point where we understand why these three women, why now in particular. But anyway. Okay, Sarah, moving it back to you. I don't, I mean, we've kind of covered some of the questions as we were going. And I know that I just have to figure out the container, you know, and it ain't this Tupperware. it's got it's I got to upgrade my Tupperware but I guess I mean and the biggest thing is what about the three introductions that's my only question what about the three introductions so Carly can I move this back to you because you've often said you know there's different ways to frame the story it's like in a world where or whatever like is there some kind of suggestion you can have in terms of that because I don't think it's working introducing the three characters separately and like you say you need to explain how they all related to each other while upping their attention is there something we can do around that town and then the introduction of each of the women that doesn't quite feel like boom boom boom right so some options would be like the character goal obstacle this is why i keep trying to figure out what the goal is here like there's the character goal obstacle right so there's our three characters what are their singular goal you're i think right now you're focusing maybe on their independent goals so the character this is goals but obviously we want the goal to be singular and then the obstacle like what is the obstacle they're coming up against for example three doctors trying to bring medicine to a rural community obstacle they get to the town as cc said they get to the town and they're not wanted or they can't find a way to fit in within the town that's a simplified version Obviously we spend a bit more time on this Like a what if question version of the hook would be what if three female doctors who need to start a new life for XYZ reason you know think they going to make a difference in this town and an outbreak breaks out So you know what I trying to say Like we need to figure out the character goal obstacle. What other ideas could we do? We could do the character situation complication, which is what that was what I was trying to get at when we were talking about the situation, meaning the clinic. So the characters, the situation they find themselves and they find themselves at this clinic or rebuilding this clinic. And then what's the complication when they build the clinic? Slightly different way to think about what CeCe was saying with them not being wanted. So yeah, I think it is challenging with the three. That's why we say this every time we do a multi POV query. It's like, it is really tricky. So I think you either, and it sounds like you can't really centralize one person. You feel very strongly that the three, I'm making my little triangle, that the three of them are part of it. So it's figuring out how they're connected, what's their goal and obstacle, or what's their situation and complication. So that would be what I would focus on. Okay. Thanks. Appreciate it. Greatly. Okay. All right. So we're running out of time there. So let's move on to the pages. Sarah, can you give us an overview of what's in them? We open with Eve feeling all the external pressure from everything that's in her life, past and present. Swimming, that's her containment. That's the way she processes everything. And she can have her anger, you know, float free. So she's swimming and going through all the internal pressures. Then she stops swimming and goes inside and still grasps for something to contain what's spiraling in her. And there's a resident fellow in her bed. And well, anyway, and then Janet and Hannah arrive, bust in the house with the dog to get ready for their third Thursday community outreach clinic that they religiously do. and it's it's their their friendship colliding with pressure in eve and it kind of stabilizes everybody but everybody has their own thing and then they kind of you know run through this is our life get over it move on and yes there's a man in your bed and we're just this is us thank you sarah okay before we go to carly and cc's take on that we're just going to have a word from our sponsors. It is my 10th wedding anniversary this year and my husband and I are planning on what we want to do to celebrate. When we got married, two 20-somethings fresh out of grad school, just starting their careers, we did not want to invest in a big honeymoon. It felt kind of irresponsible when we wanted to buy a house and all those grown-up things. Fast forward to 2026 and we are planning a wine tour in Italy. If you have travel coming up, then join me in using Rosetta Stone to learn some new local languages. There's something about spring that feels like a reset, fresh energy, and that motivation to try something new. And imagine arriving for your trip, actually understanding the language. I'm talking about ordering confidently, connecting with locals, and feeling immersed instead of just visiting. Rosetta Stone has been a trusted leader for over 30 years. Their immersive, intuitive method helps you naturally absorb the language without memorizing random vocabulary lists. You learn by connecting words, visuals, and meaning in context, plus their true accent technology gives you real-time feedback on your pronunciation so you sound more natural. Whether you have five minutes or an hour, you can access lessons from your desktop or the mobile app. Ready to start learning a new language this spring? Visit rosettastone.com slash today today to explore Rosetta Stone and choose the language that's right for you. Go to rosettastone.com slash today now and begin your language learning journey. Alrighty, Cece, I'm going to hand it straight to you. Tell us what you think. I first want to commend how I still don't have a word for it I've been thinking about a word for this since yesterday I'm going to have to use a very generic word that's unworthy of your pages I want to commend how beautiful the writing is I thought that that was a lot of times people pitch things as the sentences arithmetic and I'm like right, right they're super arithmetic, I'm sure they are most of the time they're not and this is and so you know that and I think that you should be very proud of that I'm sure you are, but I'll say it anyway. I love rhythm in writing, and I think that you have a very developed author voice. That's always a joy to see. Okay, let's talk about where we are, where we are in the story when we first meet these women. So I feel like most storytellers, if not all storytellers, understand that their opening pages, the job of that is to tell us what's happening in the protagonist's life. I mean, they have to pick a what is happening, a specific what is happening, woman going to the grocery store, couple walking into a wedding. It could be anything, right? And again, like I said, most, if not all, storytellers understand the external nature of the what is happening, the scene that a camera could capture. In this case, Eve's swimming. Eve is swimming. savvy storytellers understand that that's just half the job the other half is capturing what's happening internally what's happening in their inner life and you have to pick that just as carefully if not even more carefully than what's happening externally so externally we have a woman swimming internally we have a woman going through and you didn't share this in your summary so i'm not going to be the one to ruin it but she's going through like she's thinking about what's happening in her life in a way that is like, like there's a lot, you know, like there is a lot going on. We understand that her useless ex nearly killed her. We understand that Mara, who is Mara, we don't know yet. And that's good. No name explaining, but Mara died unexpectedly. We understand that there was a system that failed her. And we understand that she's wounded deeply, deeply wounded. Do we know this specific exact shape, all encompassing? No. And either we supposed to because that would be like killing the tension but come on like that is a big thing right so we also know that there are antagonistic forces the so the dean and i'm not sure if it's dos the dean and the rest or if it's dos another person the dean because because the oxford comma i think it's dos being the dean but i'm not sure but that's also not the point the point is there are antagonistic forces with specificity and that she is very defiant she refuses to break not for DOS, not for the system, not for anyone that she's going to keep on fighting. So we have so much on her spirit and what she's up against. And that's great. Like that's all amazing. I will say though, and again, this is a matter of taste. And if your story is literary, you get to choose. This is not something that you say that you have to follow. Well, you don't have to follow anything that we say, but this is something that literary fiction can do if you want to. I don't think you should, but you can, if you want to. I think that what's happening externally needs to be just as compelling. right now her swimming frankly way more tedious than I would have liked you know like I get that it matches the themes of the books I get that it matches the title and sure you're gonna have her swimming but something else needs to be happening with externality to really up the tension because and this is what I was getting at when I was talking about like when a storyteller opens a book they're they're sharing two lives the inner life and the external life a lot of people go oh I have so much juiciness to share in the inner life that I'm going to have a scene that's not as juicy, you know, because they don't want to like remove from, they don't want to take attention from what's happening in the protagonist's mind. But that, in my opinion, is a mistake. We need the external scene to be just as compelling as what's happening in their mind, because we need to understand this is a book that has plot, that has things that the protagonist is up against externally too, not just with her telling us, but with us seeing it. So I don't think that she should be alone swimming. Like, I don't think that's compelling enough. And then the second part of that, which is, you know, her having this man in her bed and her friends walking in, I didn't see, and I think this is intentional, but you can tell us, I didn't see her like bothered by the fact that her friends walked in while he was there or anything. Like there didn't seem to be like any power imbalances at play. And I always say like, wherever you start your story, your protagonist needs to be facing power dynamics that are interesting and juicy. And power dynamics can include power struggle it can include threats to power temptations to power but power is necessary power dynamics are necessary and they just seem to get along like and they're so like basically there doesn't seem to be any messy power dynamics between them which I think is the intention because they're good friends and why should there be messy power dynamics but then I just don't know that that's the right place to start I feel like these are things that can exist in the book but to start you really want to like grab your reader and make the reader go oh juicy and I'm not feeling that here. I am feeling beautiful writing, beautiful, beautiful writing. Right, Cece, thank you so much. Okay, Carly, we're handing it across to you now. All right, so we started with a timestamp. I love a timestamp. I used to have a timestamp jingle. I don't even know what it is anymore. I'll have to make up a new one. What I also think we need though is a location stamp because my Canadian born person was like, we're swimming outdoors in late February. I honestly thought she had an indoor pool. Like where I grew up, fancy people had indoor pools because you couldn't like swim in the winter. So I don't know. Obviously, this is very particular to me, but there is a huge larger portion of your readership that'll be from northern US, Canada, et cetera, hopefully globally. Lots of readers. So I would just put the location stamp in there. So it's a bit more clear about the fact that she's swimming outside at that time of year. I think that would help a little bit because right away I was trying to be like, because in my mind, again, if it was February and I was swimming at 4 a.m., I'd be like, what time did the pool open so that I'd have to go to the gym to do the swimming? So the logistics, whenever I get tripped up with logistics, it just slows down me being able to like get my entry point into the story. So I really think just a location stamp would be able to solve that pretty quickly. There's so many beautiful lines. You know, I really liked the first line and we'll talk about lines and sentences in a second, but you know, 4am isn't night, isn't morning either, a dark hour that belongs to Eve Miller. I love that. You know, I think it sets the tone also for the kind of that punchy writing. And so I want to talk a little bit about the balance between the more punchier sentences. So in my opinion, and I'm apologize to CC in advance for talking about sports, I can't not talk about sports. But so if you're watching on YouTube, basically, the way that I feel about this is like a boxing sense, right? Because I feel like you're doing like jab, jab, right? You're doing quick sentence, quick sentence, but then you're not coming around for the hook, right? It's like jab, jab, right? punch, punch. And then like, it takes time to come around for the hook. And you're, you're watching on YouTube. CC's trying to make this here. But so I don't know, for me, I just, I was kept waiting for the, like it was jabbed out and I kept waiting for the hook, right? The slow, cause then the person's thinking, okay, quick hit, quick hit. And then, then all of a sudden, when you go slow, they're not ready for it. So I felt like you were so on your toes in this, like so on the short sentences that it's created a sense of urgency, but I wasn't sure what we were urgent for because she again is in the pool and swimming is an endurance activity right so it's like you know it can be quick obviously for doing sprints but it is still an endurance activity in a certain sense because you're doing these like longer you know laps back and forth so I just I don't know I just felt and maybe it's intentional sometimes imbalance is intentional especially literary fiction and that's the point but I my mind was just kind of trying to figure out how we can kind of bring all these things together so that they're in communication with each other a bit more so that would just be my feedback on you know when are we doing the quick sentences when are we doing the longer sentences I think that we need to play around with that a little bit more I also really felt like this was actually quite cinematic with her in the pool once I figured out where we were I felt like it was it was really cinematic so I also felt like if we were filming this we would see her like touch the wall do this you know do the change kick switch and then it'd like cutting between like and I so I could see this in a cinematic way in a book way I felt like you were introducing a lot of characters that I didn't know and so that I was like okay who am I supposed to be focused on here we're just trying to get introduced to her and then we're you know talking about the ex and Mara and the work and then the best friends show up and then she got a man in her bed and I like okay that a lot of people for five pages so that felt a little again a little unbalanced to me but there some again and every time I you know making a comment about what I think could use some revision I also make a note about what I really liked you know I really liked the line her career isn't a parking spot to claim beautiful line that's so so good I love that line so you know those are kind of my my big picture notes I think there's so many wonderful things and you'll see all of my notes obviously here but yeah I would just love to be more grounded in time and space that's kind of my main note and then thinking about how we're burying up the sentence structures okay great thanks Carly we're going to hand it across to Sarah now again you know coming in terms of intentionality because we're always saying everything you do must be done with intentionality so I know Sarah you would have picked the swimming scene with great intentionality can you take us through that and perhaps we can brainstorm if there's another way to begin including all of these things that you wanted that will factor in what Cece was asking for so take us through that. I understand what what Charlie's saying about the punches but I thought and maybe it was just me I thought I layered in punch punch punch and then lyrical and then punch punch punch lyrical. Opening in the pool, I tried, as you always use, Bianca, your analogies of entering the house. I've entered this house I don't know how many times. I think this entering the house in this way is like I crawled through the dryer vent. Something, you know, it was not originally intended, but the pool is for Eve, a containment. And it's also, if I had started in a clinic, whatever, if I had started, which chapter two has her in the car driving to clinic? Okay, it's just, you know, this has, we can actually get her, her anger, her interiority in the pool and understand all the pressures because she's relaxed for once. At 4 a.m. is the only time, and I believe the line is, her mind, red lines everywhere but the water. That's, that's it. there's after the a dark hour that belongs to eve miller too late for drunks like her mother and too early for saints like her dead father you are only going to think about that in the water when you're her body is on autopilot because swimming you know she was a collegiate swimmer so you know everything surfaces up so i i i it was intentional bianca like beyond intentional i think i think it was body i think it was my body saying this is where it needs to go and that's where embodied fiction also comes back, is we have to know how she moves. Totally get that. I'm trying to think, is there some kind of disruption that can happen in the water, again, that reveals so much about her character, and again, it can include that embodied fiction, because people who work in these situations, when a crisis happens, they don't even think. Their bodies just react, whereas everybody else is like screaming in their heads and wanting to run away. So I don't know, Is there an animal that can fall into the pool, a critter or something? Like I'm trying to think of something that can disrupt the scene. I don't know. Cece, what are you thinking? Is there a way we can keep it in the pool, but have some kind of disruption that still fulfills what Sarah's trying to do here? I think that first and foremost, if this is literary, you get to start slowly like this. I think that it's important to establish this so that you don't feel like we're pressuring you. And I want that to be something that you hold on to as we do discuss potential other options. You always have the option to keep it. You know, that's fine. If you do want to at least explore other options, one idea I had is that, again, I don't know the specific settings or this would fit, but it's really just to give you an idea. The pool could be closed, right? And there could be a security guard telling her she can't go in the pool. And then she could be like, there's an emergency medicine. I'm a doctor. You have to let me get through. And we're going, oh my God, there's an emergency. And the emergency is she needs to swim. like but but again it would it would show how she acts in a situation where there is an external force disrupting her and it would also surprise my brain because my brain would be like emergency emergency there is a doctor there is a doctor and you know the emergency is the doctor needs needs care herself the the care that only the pool can bring her and i'm sure that won't fit in the actual logistics and nuts and bolts of the story but it's really just to illustrate the fact that you have right now a very soft external opening against a very tumultuous and interesting internal opening. And I personally don't think that's serving the propulsive nature of your story, especially because her interiority is focused on what happened. There's very little futurizing. If you added futurizing, maybe that would tweak it. You know, maybe that would solve for it. There's more than one ways to address this issue. I thought of the external because I thought to myself, this is a with a lot of external plot but you know you know your story best. Kali? I think a simple just like losing track of time could honestly work you know like she's swimming and then doesn't realize what time it is and the friends are there and need to take her for their Thursday work day or if you want to start and again I don't know how this plays into the larger picture if you want to start with a more romantic opening like how does she feel about this guy in her bed like could he be swimming laps alongside her? Could he be the one to get her and be like, hey, babe, you got to get out? Like, you know, your friends are here. I don't know, just like some way to see some more interaction in that sense. But I think a simple like losing track of time could work. Her friends come out back and they're like, what are you doing? And then she's like, oh, this is very hard character for me. I never lose track of time. And then we can internalize that. I don't know. I feel very strongly that disruption for disruption sake doesn't work. You know, heel broken, losing track of time, I don't think that would work. I think you need a disruption that shows power imbalance and power dynamics, or else it feels devicey and gimmicky, or else just let her swim. That's my take. It could be as simple as, because of everything we learn in the five pages, it could be as simple as she has a panic attack and has to swim earlier or something, or realizing that she left the research fellow in her bag. I didn't need to do that. But I mean, all this makes sense. But again, crisis just for crisis makes me, I love you guys, but it makes me go, but it makes sense, but it still makes me cringe. So, but it could be as simple as just a panic attack that leads into the 4 a.m. It's not morning. It's not night either. Because we've all had those days. Okay. So Sarah, so in terms of then the future rising, if you don't want to put in a disruption, Cece's suggestion about her futurizing rather than her just thinking about the past and everything that's already happened I mean it's something to to think about and move maybe she knows she's going to lose her job it's just when you know that's that's what the whole DOS thing is is that you know it's which is why it's in the query of you know she's being shoved out so I don't know things to think. But, you know, so I, and I also would like to comment very quickly that apparently the trying to put the reader in the body of her in movement fell flat, if I'm correct in both of your feedbacks, Carly and Cece, that it's the push glide, push pull glide, forget feet on the wall. It was too much embodied. lead? It's to me, it's not that it fell flat, because that would be a very unfair description of it. To me, it felt quiet. And if quiet is the intention, keep quiet. I you know, something I'm always looking for when I speak to an author is how set they are in their in their vision. And you seem to me as someone who's very set in your vision. And I applaud you for that, like stay, stay within your vision. It might not work for me, it might not make me curious. But honestly, and I say this with love to myself, who cares? Your job is not to write for me. Your job is to write for your readership, you know, and you know your readers taste. So again, all we can do is like taste the food you make and share how it tastes for us. But there are other people who are going to taste it and we're going to have a different take on it. Yeah, for me, there wasn't anything wrong with it. It's more, I just really wanted to be more grounded in place. Like I just felt very untethered. So that was, you know, if you want to oversimplify my note, it would just be, yeah, can we just ground ourselves in place more? and it also is is the water is disorienting so i mean there was there was a reason behind that but yeah but but moving up where she is makes sense and it completely makes sense now like oh yeah it's february sarah you were saying there was an intentionality to the untetheredness of the swimming you specifically wanted that well there i mean that's that's just the the because everything else is contained, language, control, everything else is contained in medicine, that the uncontainment in the water, that it was specific in its intention, its actual function on the page may have fallen a little left or right of center, but it is intentional. And to answer one other quick question to circle back. I have two questions. One, the friendship is supposed to show that they don't care because they deal with so much chaos in their work lives that the fact that Eve has a man in her bed, but it's Thursday. It's third Thursday. You knew it was coming, so move it along. And the other quick question is the Greek chorus with the music. I know that leads back to Carly's cinematic feel. But that is also the Greek chorus doing a lot where the character's not having to say it in 16 pages of interiority, like, I feel bad. But, you know, the songs talk about, you know, betrayal and gossip and feeling lost is the easiest way to describe those two songs. So I just, if either one of you has a quick note on that. I skim by songs personally just because there are so many songs in the world I don't know every song and so unless a song feels specific to you the reader I find them tricky so they didn't add anything for me that would be my answer. Cece I liked them. We're all in disagreement today. But that's good I'm telling you this this this is what the more specific the art the more different you have the opinions and Sarah's work is very specific. Like Sarah, you hold onto your vision, honestly, think thoughtfully over the things we're telling you, but hold onto your vision. I guess I'm not making popcorn because there was, well, there is kind of a duel. So I guess I'm going to go pop popcorn. It's you're not, it's your job is not to make me want your pages. Your job is to write the pages that you want to write. And if, and if you know an agent, whether it's me or someone else or Carly, like if an agent wants it, an agent wants it. Okay, everyone, our time is up. Sarah, thank you so much for joining us and for sharing your, work and making yourself vulnerable so that everybody else can learn from it. We really, really appreciate it. Next week, we have authors on the show. And then in two weeks time, we're back to another Books with Hooks. Thanks so much, everyone. Bye. Have a great day. Bye-bye. Bye. Cece Lira is a literary agent at Wendy Sherman Associates. If you'd like to query Cece, please refer to the submission guidelines at www.wsherman.com. Carly Waters is a literary agent at P.S. Literary Agency, but her work on this podcast is not affiliated with the agency and the views expressed by Carly on this podcast are solely that of her as a podcast co-host and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, policies, or position of P.S. Literary Agency.