Marketing School - Digital Marketing and Online Marketing Tips

AI Has Introduced Product Slop

23 min
Jan 29, 20263 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

The episode discusses how AI has created 'product slop' - the tendency to rapidly ship too many features without proper consideration due to AI's speed capabilities. The hosts explore AI-generated content ranking challenges, ChatGPT's upcoming advertising platform, and optimization strategies for AI search engines.

Insights
  • AI's speed advantage is creating 'product slop' where companies ship features too quickly without proper validation, leading to feature bloat and poor user experience
  • AI-generated content can initially rank well in search but typically disappears after 3 months without human input and trust signals
  • ChatGPT's advertising launch represents a major opportunity for early adopters, similar to early Facebook and Google ads
  • Lazy marketers using AI to work less rather than accomplish more are setting themselves up to be replaced
  • The shift from SEO to AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) is gaining momentum as AI search becomes more prevalent
Trends
Product slop phenomenon due to AI-accelerated development cyclesMarketing slop and engineering slop across industriesRise of Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) over traditional SEOChatGPT advertising platform launch creating new marketing opportunitiesAI-generated content requiring human oversight for long-term ranking successStreaming while coding as content creation strategyX articles gaining massive engagement and viewsCorporate advertisers preparing for ChatGPT ads launchShift from 'being found' to 'being chosen' in searchLive streaming development work for audience building
Companies
OpenAI
Launching ChatGPT advertising platform with ex-Meta executives leading the initiative
Google
Referenced for early advertising success and current AI content ranking algorithm changes
Meta
Former executives now working at OpenAI on ChatGPT advertising platform development
Microsoft
Released guide on optimizing content for ChatGPT and AI search engines
Ubersuggest
Used as example of product that could suffer from feature bloat due to rapid AI development
Answer The Public
Mentioned alongside Ubersuggest as example of product vulnerable to feature creep
Facebook
Historical comparison for early advertising opportunities similar to ChatGPT's launch
Instagram
Sam Altman cited Instagram ads as example of useful advertising format for ChatGPT
Instacart
Former CEO now leading OpenAI applications division including advertising efforts
Ahrefs
Conference mentioned where Search Everywhere Optimization term was discussed
National Geographic
Suggested as potential employer for friend who prefers photography over marketing
Patagonia
Used in Microsoft's example of how AI reasoning works for product recommendations
The North Face
Mentioned alongside Patagonia in AI product recommendation reasoning example
Deloitte
Referenced in context of viral X article that received 30 million views
SimilarWeb
Cited data comparing X and Threads daily active users across platforms
People
Sam Altman
OpenAI CEO tweeted about ChatGPT advertising testing and Instagram-style ad format preferences
Mike Cornujan
LinkedIn user who conducted experiment with 2,000 AI-generated articles across 20 domains
Daniel Preachley
Tweeted about ChatGPT advertising opportunities comparing it to early Google and Facebook ads
Bill Gates
Quoted regarding preference for hiring lazy but smart people who find creative solutions
Patrick Stocks
Mentioned as proponent of Search Everywhere Optimization term at Ahrefs conference
Alex Groberman
Wrote viral X article summarizing Microsoft's ChatGPT optimization guide
Nikita Beard
Head of product at X, reportedly overseeing article campaign with million dollar reward
Bridgemind
Streamer vibe coding apps until reaching $1 million revenue, building audience through live streams
Quotes
"More things faster is rarely a recipe for excellence. When it takes weeks to ship, you justify every feature. When it takes hours, you ship everything."
HostEarly in episode
"This should give you hope, those of you listening to this, because it has never been easier to get ahead."
HostMid episode
"We will try to make ads ever more useful to users."
Sam AltmanWhen discussing ChatGPT ads
"I'm getting so many videos of people using Claude and they're like, look, it's doing my job for me so I can work less and get paid."
NeilDiscussion about lazy marketers
"Eventually you are going to be replaced with this kind of attitude."
HostResponse to lazy AI usage
Full Transcript
2 Speakers
Speaker A

People are talking about, okay, these agent decoders.

0:00

Speaker B

Right.

0:01

Speaker A

I think what's happening now is, and we've kind of warned against this, but there's a new phrase now. So we talk about AI slop, like content slop. Right now there's product slop because it's so easy to build all these products. So when you we can ship at a hundred times the speed. The problem now, Neil, is whatever you build into ubersuggest or whatever, you know, you build into answer to public, there could be risk where you have too much features and it's too much crap and then it inundates the entire system. So more things faster is rarely a recipe for excellence. When it takes weeks to ship, you justify every feature. When it takes hours, you ship everything. Why not? It feels like progress and momentum. That's what we call perceived progress.

0:02

Speaker B

Yeah, but it just hasn't just introduced a product slop, it's introduced marketing slop. It's introduced engineering slop. It's introduced slop everywhere because people are doing a lot of stuff that they don't need to do. The amount of messages I get on a weekly basis of people showing me cool shit they're doing with AI AI and no joke, more than nine out of 10 times I be like, this is never going to make anyone any money or do anything from. They just created a new cool shiny thing for marketing and it's like whoop dee doo.

0:41

Speaker A

So talk. Speaking about slop, I. I saw this post on LinkedIn. This guy Mike Cor Cornujan wrote this. So he said we published 2,000 AI generated articles across 20 new domains with zero authority to see if raw AI content could rank. Here's what happened in just 36 days. So 71% of pages got indexed. Eight sites ranked for 1,000 keywords each. 122,000 impressions, over 240 clicks in total. That seems very low. Five sites hit top 30 for 30% of their keywords. But here's the plot twist. All articles disappeared from search after three months. What went wrong? First, it's obvious that all the sites were brand new. No trust signals, no domain authority, nothing to make Google believe you're worth citing. Plus, the condom was fully AI generated with no human input or originality. No author with strong EA T signals. How do you know that's a reason? Because we tested six AI assisted articles on our main blog. The difference night and day still ranking with three in the top 10. After six months, 550,000 impressions and growing featured as sources in AI overview. So yes, AI generated content can rank easily, but it doesn't stay there unless the content is updated and supported by enough trust signals for Google, AKA SEO.

1:13

Speaker B

Yeah, yeah. You can't just spam. We've been saying this for ages. Everyone who's just creating tons of AI junk content, is it going to do well? You need to involve a human. You need to build trust. You need to have the EE AI elements. Expertise or experience. Expertise, authority and trust. On a side note, you know what? I've been seeing a lot from SEOs and marketers. The lazy marketers are getting even lazier. How so? Because of AI, I'm getting so many videos of people using Claude Cowork and they're like, look, it's doing my job for me so I can work less and get paid. Like the lazy people are getting lazier.

2:17

Speaker A

Wait, wait, like people at your company?

2:57

Speaker B

Not my company. Like friends who are in marketing.

3:00

Speaker A

Oh, I get it. They're showing you how they're doing it.

3:04

Speaker B

Now with Claude Cowork and how they're working less and getting paid. Like I have people being like, look, I'm getting paid like 120 grand and look, I'm doing Cloud cowork. He's the best investment ever. You know, I can work less and get paid the same.

3:06

Speaker A

Yeah.

3:19

Speaker B

And I'm like, this is just this terrible attitude. I'm like, eventually you are going to be replaced with this kind of attitude.

3:19

Speaker A

I, well, I don't know. I mean, remember what Bill Gates used to say? He's like, you know, you don't want to exactly have this. You want to work for someone that's smart, but you want to work for someone that's lazy. Because lazy people always find a loophole and they find like a, like a creative way to do things. So are these people lazy and smart?

3:25

Speaker B

They're smart enough to figure out how to do a lot of their job without doing it, but they're not smart enough to go above and beyond and do more to maintain and keep their job and grow within the corporation. So these are people who are pretty much entry level jobs, not mid level, maybe a little bit higher than entry. And most of them that have been sending me, I don't have too many examples, but the majority of the ones who sent me, there's only three. The three that I'm thinking of, they also complain how the world is against, they don't make enough money, people should pay them more. Like it's unfair and they have tons of things about that. So they don't. I'm not saying they're right or wrong. I'm just saying I haven't seen them make the effort to try to improve themselves. I have seen them make the most amount of effort in recent times to improve themselves, but that's because of AI and specifically AI doing their job so they can get paid and travel more, do whatever they want so they don't have to work. That's one of the three.

3:43

Speaker A

Yeah.

4:43

Speaker B

Okay, there's two more.

4:43

Speaker A

So these people are maybe humble and smart, but not hungry. Yes.

4:45

Speaker B

And I don't know how smart you would want it because it's like they don't ever want to get better if it involves work. They want to get better if it means they can work less.

4:52

Speaker A

You know, this should give you hope, those of you listening to this, because it has never been easier to get ahead. Yeah. That's all I got to say.

5:02

Speaker B

Get paid so well. And I'm like, so you know, I only had to work like 30 minutes to hour day. Like, yeah, look at this. I'm getting 150 grand a year. 120 or whatever.

5:09

Speaker A

Don't get me wrong, I'm a pretty lazy person. I just like doing things in a creative way. But I like keeping myself stimulated.

5:18

Speaker B

So, yeah, I need to keep myself stimulated.

5:23

Speaker A

Yeah.

5:26

Speaker B

You know what? I actually told all three what you should go into a new industry. I'm like, you do all this kind of stuff because you never like marketing. You should go into something you love.

5:26

Speaker A

Yeah.

5:35

Speaker B

And then you'll put in the time and effort and get really good.

5:36

Speaker A

Use that marketing for someone that will pay you for it. Their marketing skills get paid by someone in a.

5:38

Speaker B

No, no. They're getting paid for marketing. They're employees. I'm saying they shouldn't be marketing employees. They should go do something else in their life.

5:45

Speaker A

Like, what would one of them. Okay, what about someone that likes to travel? What. What do you think he would do?

5:51

Speaker B

He should be a photographer. National Geographic. He does amazing landscape and nature pictures, animals and stuff. Really good. Loves it. And then when I tell him to, he's like, ah, it's not going to make enough money. I rather be a marketer.

5:54

Speaker A

And I'm like, but it's not about.

6:05

Speaker B

The money and you can just. And they travel anyways. I'm like, you should just go take pictures. And if you're really good at what you do, I believe someone would pay you 100, 200 grand a year.

6:06

Speaker A

Not only that, he'll find someone amazing to marry too, because, oh, what do you do? I'm a photographer for National Geographic. That's pretty sexy.

6:16

Speaker B

Yes. Cause he ideally wants to marry someone who travels and wants to take photos. Yeah. And I'll be like, you'd be a perfect National Geographic.

6:23

Speaker A

You should send him this clip.

6:30

Speaker B

And I believe if you're really good at taking photos, people will pay you more than a hundred grand a year.

6:32

Speaker A

Oh, for sure. For sure. We know something we should Talk about because ChatGPT ads is coming out soon. So Daniel Preachley tweeted this out. I used to see this a guy on Clubhouse all the time.

6:37

Speaker B

Clubhouse.

6:47

Speaker A

So ChatGPT experimenting with advertising in their free subscription. I'm old enough to remember when Google started running ads, and for a few years you can get warm leads for pennies. I also remember when Facebook launched ads and they had so many eyeballs. And so the first advertiser cost nothing to get clients for the first few years. Corporate advertisers don't move fast on new things. They take six months to plan at six months to test before they go in heavy. So right now, ChatGPT has almost a billion users a week. If they start running ads, they will have a lot of eyeballs. Not so many advertisers until the corporates come in. What do you think?

6:49

Speaker B

That's wrong.

7:16

Speaker A

That's totally wrong.

7:17

Speaker B

It is, of course, always cheaper at the beginning. But you know how many corporations I know that?

7:19

Speaker A

I think they're already. Because they've seen this movie.

7:23

Speaker B

Yeah, they've seen this so many times. This is nothing new. And they've already been making the push. How many calls do you get on a monthly basis? That comes like, we need Chad GBT to recommend our production service. Same here. Probably one of the biggest requests. They're already on. The ads kick in. There have been waiting for ads to come out from day one. Yeah.

7:25

Speaker A

Yep. And Sam Altman tweeted this. I mean, he said, you know, we're starting to test ads in the free tier, but here's. Here's a signal for you all. An example of ads I like are on Instagram, where I found stuff I like that I otherwise would never have. Would have. We will try to make ads ever more useful to users. So he's implying here it's probably gonna look more like a social feed.

7:45

Speaker B

You do know who runs their ads, right?

8:04

Speaker A

Like ex meta person.

8:07

Speaker B

Yeah, I know the person's name Exactly. But their LinkedIn doesn't say it, so I don't want to say it, but Fiji. Simone came from Facebook. She tweeted about ads she's high up.

8:09

Speaker A

Wasn't the Instacart one.

8:22

Speaker B

Yeah, she was ex Instacart CEO. Then she became CEO of OpenAI Applications. And I believe ads is underneath her. But if you look at a lot of the people that ran ads at Meta, they are at OpenAI.

8:23

Speaker A

But here's the thing that I think. So the question we should answer here is how hard should you bet? And I think you should that extremely hard. You should press hard on this. I mean, the demand is already there.

8:37

Speaker B

Demands there.

8:45

Speaker A

I remember when Facebook ads first came out, I'm like, man, didn't press hard yet. But that's like the crappy, like side ads. Doesn't matter. It's going to get better. You press hard because this is one of those situations where it's always been like this. It starts out very cheap and it gets ever more expensive and it never really gets cheaper. So.

8:46

Speaker B

Yes.

9:02

Speaker A

So here's a question for you. How hard when you think about your clients, like you're not working directly with their clients, but how do you think they should allocate their.

9:03

Speaker B

I don't look at as budgets. I look at it as spend whatever's profitable. And most companies, even though they have budgets, every time they exceed their budgets and their campaigns are profitable, they can go to CFO even if it's publicly traded, and they're given as much money as they want as long as they stay within some profitability band. Almost any CFO is going to approve some testing. You could take ten thousand thousand dollars, pick a number and start off with it. If you're getting good traction, your finance people will let you ramp it up. I've never heard a finance person says, oh, it's highly profitable. You're limited on what you can spend. They usually say, well, spend as much as you can as long as it's profitable. But just make sure we're not in a cash flow crunch. And the last question is, when do we pay the bill? When do we collect the revenues? And as long as you're not in a cash flow crunch and the numbers pan up, you people are like, spend, baby, spend now.

9:13

Speaker A

Because we're talking about ChatGPT. Microsoft actually revealed how to get traffic from ChatGPT.

10:06

Speaker B

So I'm curious on this one. Did they talk about stuff that was 5 months old or 10 months old?

10:11

Speaker A

This article is too long. So here's what it shows. So it's another one of these articles. Okay, so Microsoft just released a here's how to get traffic from ChatGPT guide. It's gotten surprisingly little attention. Let's go over it together. So.

10:17

Speaker B

Oh my God. It's not that long.

10:34

Speaker A

It's pretty long. So Microsoft central message is in the doc is that retail competition is shifting from being found to being chosen. I'm just going to read the headers. Microsoft also broke down the difference to them between AEO and geo. Microsoft makes it a very clear distinction. Agentic Engine Optimization in their estimation optimizes content and data. So AI assistants can copilots can find it, understand it, summarize it. Just not getting to the point.

10:35

Speaker B

On that note, when you're talking about AEO versus geo, remember at the AHREFS conference, you said Search Everywhere Optimization was going to win. We hear AEO more from customers more than anything else.

11:02

Speaker A

Patrick Stocks was the one that said he saw Search Everywhere Optimization more. And I actually asked the other day. I asked my gong. I said, hey, look at our sales calls for in the last six months or so. And it's Answer Engine Optimization and Generative Engine Optimization.

11:14

Speaker B

Yeah, we're seeing AEO pick up more steam than anything else.

11:29

Speaker A

Yeah. And then you know what I did with that? I said, hey, now map it with the AHREFS MCP to see what keywords are exploding. It's actually the GEO and AEO are exploding in trends right now. Yeah. So I'm trying to get a key takeaway for this one. Okay. Microsoft then went into how AI actually decides what to recommend. Okay, so there's a couple things here. So AI does not rely on one data source, but rather fuses crawled web data, product feeds and APIs live website data. Okay. And like AI reasoning includes Patagonia North Face make quality jackets. Hiking jackets need to be lightweight and waterproof. Your model is $179. And in stocks of feeds, brand X is known for hiking equipment. So brand positioning. Okay, Number five, Microsoft then really breaks down the journey from SEO to AO to geo. Then Microsoft talks about three data layers, control. You know what? I'm just gonna use GROK to summarize this because this is really annoying to read. That's what I'm gonna do.

11:32

Speaker B

Yes, it's right there on that page.

12:27

Speaker A

Give me the key points and then we can finally talk about it. See, guys, maybe don't write an article on X that just talks about another article. Like it's just talking about the. It's not even giving me key points.

12:31

Speaker B

Let's see here.

12:43

Speaker A

Pick one. Pick something else. While I'm waiting for this to follow.

12:45

Speaker B

On a random note, the Google founders all left to Florida to Avoid the billionaire tax, but it looks like it's facing tons of opposition. A lot of reporters are writing that it probably won't pass and these are left leaning sites.

12:48

Speaker A

So. Okay, I got the summary here. So Alex Groberman's post shares an in depth breakdown of Microsoft's October 2025 guide on optimizing content for AI search engines like ChatGPT, emphasizing generative engine optimization techniques to boost visibility and traffic. Key recommendations from the guide includes using structured data formats like Q and A lists and schema markup for easy AI parsing with data showing a 357% year over year increase in AI referrals to top sites, reaching 1.13 billion visits by June 2025. And the post highlights the users under the radar status despite its practical aligning for value for SEO pros and I'm.

13:02

Speaker B

Still waiting for the meat. Come on Grok, summarize.

13:47

Speaker A

It gave me more. So core recommendation is the structured piece. That's. That's the only meat.

13:50

Speaker B

Guys, I told you.

13:55

Speaker A

What did I say at the beginning? How do you get a lot of.

13:57

Speaker B

Reaching 5 to 10 months old or something like that? Yeah.

13:59

Speaker A

Okay, so this is actually really annoying. Okay, so this guy got a hundred thousand views on this using this. See this is why you know the X articles are getting a ton of views right now. This thing that. I'm sorry Alex, this added little to no value here. Okay, you got a hundred thousand views on it.

14:04

Speaker B

So as we were talking 2:54pm someone messages me and they ask you need to post and repurpose content for X articles asap. This is after we were talking about it during this episode. I don't know the person, they just have my phone number. One million dollar reward for the best article this month. Algo's boosting them. You'll shit on everyone. Excuse that person's language. I won't. I was like lol. I was just talking about this. I won't win because I don't write about politics. But I'm publishing article soon and they said nah, I'm sure you have a chance because Nikita, I don't know who Nikita is.

14:17

Speaker A

Nikita Beard, head of product at X.

14:53

Speaker B

Is almost mostly overseeing the campaign and he's heavily invested in crypto X because he has equity in Solana and other stuff. I've been, I've seen dozens of articles but they're whatever worth a shot Mio or in my humble opinion. And you can probably bait engagement from big folks.

14:56

Speaker A

I'm like you don't need a bait Engagement. Just write what you write. Like.

15:15

Speaker B

Yeah, no, I already know I'm not going to win. I'm not going to win. Like an article like Deloitte stole. I'm not saying they did, but I think the article was like Deloitte 75 billion or whatever.

15:19

Speaker A

But you don't even need to do that. There's one talking about context layering and I've read a couple of these articles and there one like that's an AR article. It got like 7 to 8 million views on it or like a couple of these cloud code setup ones. Millions and millions of views. And so, so no, no, no.

15:27

Speaker B

The article On Deloitte, the $74 billion can.

15:40

Speaker A

30 million.

15:43

Speaker B

30 million. That one is going to be too hard to beat. You can. It's too hard to get the views.

15:44

Speaker A

Forget the 1 million.

15:48

Speaker B

I'm just for the 1 million.

15:48

Speaker A

I'm not going to win that. I'm just talking about the views. I think the views are worth it because the, the thing with me is like X has a lot of smart users. You know, yesterday, you know what I, I felt was disingenuous. Similar web was like threads beat out X in terms of daily active users, but that's not the, that's not the complete story. I was only looking at mobile. But when you look at the reality, the total number of daily active users for x is like 250 million or so, whereas the total for threads is like 141, which is still high. But also when I look at threads, it's just people complaining about politics and how their life sucks.

15:50

Speaker B

So yeah, yeah, X is very similar. I see people complaining a lot about politics.

16:25

Speaker A

I don't actually see that. Mine's is. If you look at my feed, it's all, it's all AI stuff and people talking about what they built, built what they're sharing.

16:30

Speaker B

I see many politics.

16:37

Speaker A

You see all the, the not. Sorry, the. The cool stuff I share with you on. Oh, you're drinking a bad water bottle. Oh, you should, you know, have pomegranate juice. It'll like clean up your plaque and your arteries. That's stuff I read.

16:38

Speaker B

So pomegranate juice cleans up the plaque in the arteries.

16:49

Speaker A

Yeah. And then I, I shared it with my dad because, you know, when you're older you have more plaque in your arteries.

16:52

Speaker B

Right.

16:58

Speaker A

It leads to heart attack. But what it said was like the reason why pomegranate juice doesn't get marketed as much is because that. It's not helpful to the medical companies to Market that because it's not a high dollar, high cost treatment. So it's just like a, you know, natural remedy type of thing.

16:58

Speaker B

I just wrote myself an email to buy pomegranate juice.

17:14

Speaker A

Yeah. So actually, I mean when you, when you think about these, what, 10, let's talk about this because you just said you don't think you're going to get that much reach on X articles, right?

17:16

Speaker B

No, no, I think I'm going to get good reach. I meant like people are messaging me like, oh, you can win a potential million dollars or one person message me. I'm like, there's no way because I don't blog about or write about politics. I think you get hundreds and thousands of views, no problem. I don't see myself getting 10 million views in an article when it's not a mainstream topic.

17:27

Speaker A

Our point here is like tam, your, your topic, TAM is not that big. Right. Because if you're, if we're talking about dating, we're talking about politics, we're talking about money, we're talking about health, of course you're going to get a lot more views. But when you're just talking about marketing, it's a little different.

17:46

Speaker B

I agree.

18:00

Speaker A

Yeah. But the reason why I'm excited about this is because this is actually where we started in our careers. Blogging.

18:01

Speaker B

Yeah.

18:07

Speaker A

Yeah.

18:07

Speaker B

And I already have a ton of content. I just have to copy and paste and put that stuff out there.

18:08

Speaker A

Yeah, I, I'm actually more excited to talk about all the stuff I'm doing with, with Claude code and so that's exciting to me and I, I like writing, so.

18:11

Speaker B

Yeah, I think it's going to be fun.

18:18

Speaker A

Yeah. And you know what's interesting too? I, I, I've been experimenting this on with my YouTube recently because Cloud code is trending up so much. I'm just cranking out a bunch of these cloud code videos and they're like 1 out of 10 on, on YouTube. I'm like, oh, I'm just going to keep doing this for a little bit.

18:20

Speaker B

Yeah, I like it.

18:33

Speaker A

Saves money too. Yeah. All right, we have one more to do.

18:34

Speaker B

All right, let's see, let's pick, Let's see. We already talked about the death of software companies. Oh, the streamer vibe coding to 1 million. Who's the streamer that coded to $1 million?

18:38

Speaker A

Okay, so this guy over here is running a cluster of cloud code terminals, Vibe coding apps until he hits $1 million. Most Interesting Person shipping I've seen recently. He's on here too. So you can See, he's like, look, he's like dancing. He's like vibe coding and dancing and push ups.

18:55

Speaker B

Yeah, that's his dog.

19:12

Speaker A

So I guess that's all he's going to do. It's like a spectacle. Right. And if we look at his YouTube.

19:15

Speaker B

Let's just look at his YouTube for a moment. Okay.

19:20

Speaker A

So so far he has 34,000 subscribers.

19:24

Speaker B

I already like this guy, Bridgemind.

19:26

Speaker A

He's entertaining and vibe coding an app until I make $1 million. So stream four days ago. 18,000 views. 28,000 views. 20,000 views. Let me tell you why this is smart. So he's also vibe coding when he's not talking. When I spend time on this, I should just turn on my stream over the weekend and just turn it on. Like just talk. Look at this. Amazing, right? And people follow you for the spectacle and they also learn from you as well.

19:28

Speaker B

You should start streaming.

19:51

Speaker A

I do stream. I'm streaming right now.

19:52

Speaker B

No, you should stream every single day while you code.

19:54

Speaker A

I probably will. Because every single day. Now yesterday, even when I was going to bed, I was going to bed, I was like, whoa. I actually shipped five things today on top of all my other responsibilities. This is great. But this is cool. I think if you can have a cool headline like Vibe coding until I make a million dollars, $10 million or whatever, you're for sure gonna get a lot of views because people are interested in the spectacle.

19:57

Speaker B

Yeah.

20:14

Speaker A

And by the way, check this out. So he's been doing this for 120 days. That's why he has so many subs so far. So 120 days. He's vibe coded until he makes a million dollars. How much revenue do you think he's made so far?

20:15

Speaker B

30,000.

20:26

Speaker A

No, $3,106.90.

20:28

Speaker B

I hope he gets to 30,000 soon.

20:32

Speaker A

Yeah, because here's when he streamed four days ago, that was a three hour stream. And the day before that it was a six, six hour 30 minute stream. Which seems crazy, guys, but it's not that crazy when you're on this stuff. It goes.

20:34

Speaker B

So yeah, he's already doing it. So it's like you're just recording your normal life.

20:46

Speaker A

Here's a question. Do you think I should start a new channel for this one?

20:51

Speaker B

You should.

20:54

Speaker A

That's a lot of work. I don't want to start a new channel.

20:55

Speaker B

I put it on the same channel.

20:58

Speaker A

I should put it on the same channel. Something to follow me by. Oh, maybe I'll do it. Maybe you'll start doing too Maybe we'll do it together.

20:58

Speaker B

No, I'm pretty private with my personal life.

21:04

Speaker A

What do you mean? It's live streaming.

21:06

Speaker B

I don't stream my life. Or in my house.

21:08

Speaker A

No, not in my house. I'm just on my computer. You're on your computer just talking like you're doing a webinar?

21:10

Speaker B

No, but this guy's filming him.

21:14

Speaker A

Oh, no, I wouldn't. I wouldn't do that.

21:16

Speaker B

That's too much. It's like Invasion of.

21:17

Speaker A

I want to be, like, dancing and doing all this stuff.

21:19

Speaker B

No, it makes it more entertaining. You should be dancing. Go back to your EDC days. Yeah.

21:21

Speaker A

Anyway, guys, that's it for today. Check him out. Bridge, mind AI and we'll catch you next time.

21:26