Live From Cisco AI Summit | Chuck Robbins, Aaron Levie, Jeetu Patel, Costa Kladianos, Dylan Patel

You're watching TVPN.

0:00

Today is Tuesday, February 3rd, 2026 and we're live from the Cisco AI Summit. We're very happy to be here.

0:02

So pumped.

0:09

Thank you Cisco for hosting us. We have a bunch of great guests lined up. We got Aaron Levy from Box coming back on the show. Chuck Robbins, CEO of Cisco, an absolute dog. He's been with the company for decades, truly. Gigi Patel, the president and Chief Product officer will be joining us. Costa From San Francisco, 49ers who's going to be breaking down the technology of the NFL. And we're closing out with Dylan Patel, the founder and CEO of Semianalys.

0:10

That's right.

0:34

And of course, if you're wondering, LINEAR is the system for modern software development. 70% of enterprise workspaces on LINEAR are using agents really quickly. Let me also tell you about Our presenting sponsor, ramp.com Time is money save. Both easy to use, corporate cards, bill pay accounting and a whole lot more all in one place.

0:35

Starting the show, Jordyn, important announcement from Oracle. They said our partners financing with Dona Ana County, New Mexico, Shackelford County, Texas and Port Washington, Wisconsin data centers are secured at market standard rates, progressing through final syndication on schedule and consistent with investment grade deals. So if this makes you worry, a lot of other people agree this is the second, the next the their most recent post after yesterday they announced the Nvidia OpenAI deal had zero impact on our financial relationship with OpenAI. We remain highly confident in OpenAI's ability to raise funds and meet its commitments.

0:51

So what did Rune say? Rune said my confident in OpenAI's abilities to raise fund T shirt has a lot of people asking questions already answered by my t shirt. Just 2000 likes.

1:33

This is a wild strategy. Interesting comm strategy. They've been hiding comments under this.

1:45

That's rough.

1:50

I think they've stopped doing that because people are saying what an odd thing to say. Brennan says, guys, just stop tweeting. Whoever you have running PR comms needs to be fired. You're making it worse.

1:51

It is, it is very weird to take this to act specifically. This is a conversational platform. Like it's, it's hey, we want to.

2:04

Start a conversation about concerns around our.

2:11

Well also just I mean it's a total rejection of the going direct thing. Like this would be wildly different if it came from the CEO, co CEOs or Larry Ellison directly even and it had like way more nuance. It's very odd when it has like the corporate press release lingo.

2:13

This screams that no One in comms.

2:28

Actually uses X. Yeah, it's like we needed to put this out and they didn't really consider ads and maybe this probably went over fine in a press release or something. But just on X, it's a completely different context and there's so much subtext with all the different partners actively being there and even like low level employees, employees chiming in from companies that are implicated in this. There's like all this different.

2:30

I like how you compare Oracle's strategy of the nameless, faceless announcement that just concerns everyone, to run actually from OpenAI commenting and just joking about it and it actually gives you more confidence.

2:54

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, totally. Like somebody looked at the Rune post and was like, oh, f. Even Rune stopped shilling, we're effed. And Rune's like, no, it's just a funny tweet. OpenAI is doing great and that instills way more.

3:06

Gabe quoted yesterday's post and just said, okay, yay.

3:17

Okay, yay. Before we move on, CrowdStrike, your business is AI. Their business is securing it. CrowdStrike secures AI and stops breaches.

3:23

And of course Oracle's down 5% today.

3:32

It's sort of a blind.

3:35

Honestly, looking good compared to some other names.

3:36

Yeah. What's going on?

3:39

PayPal down a full 20% today. Switched out their CEO. Okay, okay. Sense this, you know, had some, some Q4 results that people weren't super exciting about. And people aren't excited about the forecast either. A number of people have been speculating back in there. Well, yeah, I mean, you look at S.H.I.E.L.D. had a, had a kind of. Was prodding Elon. He said, come on, Elon, you've always wanted PayPal to be X. The financial super app. Now's a great opportunity. PayPal right now is valued at less than what X was in the take private.

3:40

Wait, really?

4:15

Yeah.

4:15

No way.

4:16

And X is obviously working on a bunch of different financial features.

4:17

I thought PayPal all time high was in the hundreds of billions.

4:20

Yeah. So at the same, at this, at the time, 40.

4:23

It's 40 billion. Yeah, add that in. Yeah, it was, it was way up. Down 85% in the last five years. I mean, truthfully, like, a lot of people have moved on. They use, you know, cash app, but they own Venmo. Yeah, Venmo. Venmo is still very like millennial. Right? It's sort of like. And people use the Apple. Apple pay transfers Apple cash. Like there's been a number of, you know, shots across the bow for PayPal that they haven't responded to fully.

4:26

I mean their net, their net revenue.

4:52

They own Venmo because they acquired Braintree. It wasn't even like an in house like really aggressive move. They sort of just lucked out with Venmo.

4:54

PayPal, the $40 billion public company had 2025 net revenue of 33 billion.

5:01

Whoa.

5:07

So not, not great. Major sell off in pretty much all software today we had another post here. Snap is close to all time lows at $6.70 despite growing revenues and profits. Serenity says here's why the financial engineering looks criminal. Snapchat is an 11 and a half billion dollar company with a billion MAU and Q3 adjusted EBITDA of 132 million. However, stock comp for the last 12 months. $2.5 billion in the last 1212 months. So really, really insane number. This has, I mean always been the general criticism of Snap but looks like they have not adjusted course yet.

5:07

It's interesting seeing the gap between monetization, between meta a billion mal and snap a billion mal. It's like a 10x.

5:55

Yeah, which is why you were doing some Napkin math on OpenAI and I.

6:05

Think that's a billion Mao. Do they monetize like Meta or do they monetize like Snap? And on what timeline? Because or worse they have Fiji Simo. I think they could get to Meta level, you know, monetization and arpu but it also could, they could be lingering in the Snap territory which is I think 5 billion over the last year trailing 12 months. 5.77 billion on a billion mao. Not if you were monetizing it like Meta, you'd be much closer to 50 billion which is dramatic.

6:10

Matt Slotnick commenting on the sell off in software. All of this because Azure grew 39% instead of 39.4%. Of course there's a lot more going on here. Buco says knots it's that the labs can hypothetically one shot you. So why stand in front of that train? Why express quote short AI in the marketplace?

6:40

Yeah.

7:03

Really quickly let me tell you about Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform that grows with your business and lets you sell in seconds online, in store, on mobile, on social, on marketplaces and now with.

7:04

AI agents high yield. Harry says wow, this software company is getting destroyed by AI. Today it's Juventus soccer team down 13%.

7:12

Everything's destroyed.

7:23

I guess people think that somebody's going to make Claude code for software or for soccer.

7:25

Your inside man below says the the robots are going to be playing and he has a photo of or a gif of robots playing soccer.

7:31

That seems bullish. We'll see.

7:39

I don't know.

7:40

Bitcoin also down dramatically.

7:41

Where's Bitcoin 75 or something?

7:45

Joe Weisenthal has it up 73 now.

7:47

Absolute crash today. Down 13% over the last over the last five days over almost 20% over the last month. Lots of selling activity going on. Bitcoin drops to lowest.

7:50

Jim Cramer is now giving advice to Michael Saylor. He says, oh my. Bitcoin 73,000 beckons as the Dow hits a record high. Our chartist last night said this is it. The level that cannot be our chartist chartist the level that cannot be breached. It is time for strategy. Also known as Mass.

8:04

Microstrategy was the former name.

8:28

Now it's also known as Mr. For its Mr. Symbol to do a spot secondary or convert and stop this decline. Come on Mike, step up. Always rough when Jim Cramer is just like stream of consciousness posting at you. So we'll see what Saylor does. They have earnings on Thursday and that will certainly be an interesting call.

8:29

Yeah. More more details on the PayPal shares plunging nearly 20% CEO exit they replaced their CEO Alex Chris, who was brought in to steer the payments firm through slowing growth and heightened competition and simultaneously issued a lackluster profit forecast for 2026 on Tuesday, sending its shares down 19%. The board's the company's board, which named HP's Enrique Lores as its new president and CEO, said the pace of change in execution under Kris was not in line with its expectations. Chris was tasked with turning around PayPal during a challenging period and as post pandemic trading volumes declined and competitive pressures in its core business intensified from large technology companies and newer fintech rivals. It does feel like, I mean even, you know, in the press release economy it would be it would have been so easy for PayPal to do some sort of deal with stock trading or prediction markets like every financial app and news product and grocery store. Like everyone is like doing some sort of deal at least even if it doesn't materialize, even it doesn't move the needle, at least they're they're sort of putting their best foot forward. And PayPal, you still mostly hear about it in the context of what are the PayPal co founders up to now? Oh, they're building rivals to the original company. PayPal said CFO Jamie Miller would serve as interim CEO until Lorz assumes the role on March 1st. That's a pretty quick transition. Lorz was president and CEO of the Consumer electronics giant HP for more than six years. Wall street analysts said the unexpected CEO announcement raises questions about the company's turnaround strategy. Of course Disney's been going through a CEO transition, but it's been massively telegraphed with, you know, a contract that ended this year. Okay. You know a story last week about hey, we're moving faster. Hey, we're bringing somebody in who's internal who's already knows the company inside and out. And he's been a lot.

8:50

It's crazy that even with $33 billion of revenue they're, they're, they're worth roughly like three and a half circles. Right? Circle obviously, you know, just tiny, tiny company. In comparison to PayPal, you would think that PayPal just, they don't have an obvious like AI like what's the obvious AI bear case. Right.

10:39

Yeah.

11:00

They move money, they're heavily regulated. You can imagine them figuring out ways to work better with agents and capitalize on the stablecoin boom. But we'll see what the new CEO ends up doing.

11:00

The big question is whether he will bring in a formidable payments team to attempt yet another multi year turnaround.

11:14

Do they not have a formidable payments team? Who you got? Or I would hope the payments company with half a billion active users has a formidable payments team.

11:20

Apparently not. According to Evercore, you lack formidability. PayPal expects full year adjusted profit to range between low single digit percentage decline and slight increase compared with Wall street expectations of about 8% growth. Miller said the company was no longer committing to the specific 2027 outlook laid out at its investor day last year and would now provide forecasts one year at a time. So getting more uncertain. No one likes that. The change comes against the backdrop of weakening retail spending as shoppers squeezed by elevated interest rates, stubborn high living costs and sign up softening made labor market cut back in discretionary purchases and prioritize everyday necessities. Stuff that's not probably purchased with PayPal.

11:35

David in the YouTube chat says PayPal did participate in the press release economy. They announced a deal with ChatGPT at the end of last year in Q4. In 2026, PayPal will become the first digital wallet embedded directly into ChatGPT allowing users to make purchases instantly without leaving the platform. So anyways feels very oversold but and.

12:16

They also missed on the holiday quarter. So analysts were estimating that they'd make 8.8 billion and they only made 8.68 billion. And so we saw a pretty strong holiday quarter. There was a lot of growth across E commerce activity. We talked to Sean Frank at Ridge. Everyone was having like, there were a lot of jitters about is the consumer healthy? But a lot of the growing platforms were able to outrun any softening in consumer confidence by just onboarding more companies, onboarding more customers. And so if you're declining while everyone else is accelerating, that's gonna be an issue.

12:41

Ted says gold is dumping, Silver's dumping. Bitcoin is dumping. Ethereum is dumping. DXY is dumping. Stocks are dumping. If everything is going down, where's the money actually going? We talked about this last week. Sell everything. Sell your dogs, Sell your stock. Sell your crypto, Sell your bonds.

13:20

Freak out.

13:37

Yeah.

13:39

Panic.

13:39

Sell everything.

13:39

Nikita says data centers, raw materials and land. If intelligence is rapidly becoming free, expect a rapid rotation out of bytes and into bits. A lot of blue chip assets will soon be repriced. Of course. Yeah. Hardware.

13:40

Is that a typo? Does he mean rotation out of bits and into atoms?

13:54

Yes, he had a typo.

13:59

Okay, okay. Yeah. Because bytes and bits are kind of the same thing, right? But yeah, a lot of blue chip assets will soon be repriced. So I don't know. I'm excited to talk to Aaron Levy about this, about the SaaS apocalypse. What's happening with software.

14:00

Deep Dish says this is a pretty common misconception, that money has to go somewhere. That's not how market caps are measured. They're measured by last price times, shares, contracts outstanding. Not how much money you'd get for liquidating the whole pile. Tldr. The money was never there.

14:13

Quickly.

14:30

New York Stock Exchange want to change the world. Raise capital at the New York Stock Exchange. We'll be at the New York Stock Exchange next month. We're very excited for.

14:31

Cannot wait. Josh d' Amero is the new CEO of Disney, effective next month.

14:40

Yes.

14:45

This cycle moved very quickly, right?

14:46

It did, yeah.

14:50

Lucas Shaw over at Bloomberg has the. The reporting.

14:51

I'll pull it up at the same time. I think it was managed pretty well. Disney's only down 1% today.

14:55

Yeah. Iger will stay on the board and serve as a senior advisor until his retirement on December 31st. And Dana Walden was named to a new role as President and Chief Creative Officer of Disney. Iger just got the OpenAI deal done. He's like, I handled the AI transition perfectly and I'm out.

15:02

They've only had nine CEOs in the 102 year history. The CEO job requires not only running a sprawling empire, but also serving as its high profile and highly scrutinized public ambassador d' Amaro won a challenging Bake off for the job against Disney's entertainment co chairman Dana Walden.

15:24

Let's give it up for Bake Offs.

15:42

That has been the talk of Hollywood for more than a year. Walden was named to the newly created position of president and chief creative officer. Disney's leadership has been determined to run the succession process as smoothly as possible after its disastrous last try. The company named previous parks boss Bob Chapek as CEO in 2020, only to fire him and bring back Iger two years later in a corporate coup. There's a whole series of Bobs. Bob Iger, Bob Chapek, Obama there. The CEO selection was overseen by Chairman James Gorman, who joined Disney's board in 2024 after managing a widely praised succession process at Morgan Stanley. Iger was chairman when the board picked Chapek. Disney shares were roughly flat Tuesday. Gorman, in an interview, said that he has seen Iger and demaro work together and is confident the handoff will go smoothly this time. There's no tension here. Shareholders will now look to demaro to lay out and execute a growth plan for the company, whose stock price is down by nearly half from its 2020, when everyone was rapidly subscribing to Disney and locked in just watching content. They went outside and the shares have slid since and has been essentially never go outside.

15:47

Never touch grass.

16:59

This is the new Disney champion.

17:00

Never touch grass.

17:02

Run it in the super bowl for sure, gorman said. The Wall Street Journal told the Wall Street Journal that the board picked d' Amaro because of his combination of strategic thinking and understanding of the creative process, as well as his experience working both overseas and in the United States. The 54 year old spent most of his 28 years at Disney working in theme parks in the theme parks business in the US and overseas, overseeing stints at California's Disneyland and Florida's Walt Disney World. In 2020, he has been chairman of Disney's Experiences unit, which includes theme parks, cruise ships and consumer products. All things that Disney should grow in an AI world. Even if the, you know, if there's a lot of like AI slop and there's pressure on the theaters, like should grow.

17:03

But there's still so many, there's still so many questions, right? If you have widespread job loss, does that force a compression and pricing or just overall purchasing power, Right? Yeah, it's everyone. But again, you could see there's so much uncertainty. The idea that AI will just magically like AI getting good will magically make everybody spend more time off the Internet is kind of a tough argument to make. Yeah, right. Maybe people, some people react more like there's this like stated preference which people are saying as AI proliferates, people are just going to log off.

17:49

Yeah.

18:25

And I just don't actually see that happening.

18:26

Yeah. I still think, I mean, I'm interested to see when the OpenAI Disney deal really rolls out. Obviously you still can't generate Disney properties, Disney IP in Sora or in. Or at least not in ChatGPT when I tried. So they're still working on when they will roll that out. We've discussed. It will be interesting if they launch a single piece of ip like it's Spider man week and they're just releasing Spider man and then they wait and then they do Iron Man a week later. So they're like, keep hyping it as opposed to just like we're opening the floodgates. You can do any Disney ip. Will there be something special there? The bigger question for me is what does it look like in the Disney app? Because I feel like the Disney app as a parent is a very safe place. There's some stuff in there, but you can sort of parental control it and most of its cartoons and most of it's high quality Pixar stuff. But even if there's an AI generated feed, how much editorial goes into that? Like there's a pretty wide gap right now between YouTube kids, which can get sort of crazy, and Disney which is extremely curated. Academy Award winning films are in there and it's a very polished product. And if you start putting AI generated content in there, maybe some parents will love it because the kids will watch more. But I think a lot of parents would probably be like, I don't know, I'm pulling back from that. What are you trying to generate?

18:28

I'm trying to see if Grok can generate Disney ip.

19:59

Can it?

20:01

Not perfectly.

20:03

But while you review that, let me tell you about FIN AI, the number one AI agent for customer service. If you want AI to handle your customer support, go to FIN AI.

20:04

Moving on. We talked about this yesterday. We'll cover it again. Dd shares today. SpaceX just bought XAI that previously bought X. The 1.25 trillion dollar merger values XAI at $250 billion with annualized revenue of 428 million, giving it a clean 584x revenue multiple. Not bad. An annualized loss of 5.84 billion.

20:14

More importantly, mostly capex, right. I imagine XAI. Yeah, because they're building Colossus, they're buying A ton of chips. And so that's where that cash loss is coming from. Because I imagine that the inference is not at that level yet.

20:42

But of course SpaceX can start helping to foot that bill.

20:59

Yeah, they have 8 billion in revenue.

21:04

No, no, no. $8 billion in profit. In profit.

21:07

So from Reuters, the transaction value SpaceX at 1 trillion. XAI at 2. 50 billion. Investors in XAI will receive 0.1433 shares of SpaceX for every share of XAI as part of the acquisition. Some XAI executives may opt for cash instead of SpaceX stock at 75.46 per share. This marks not just the next chapter, but the next book in SpaceX and XAI's mission. Scaling to make a sentient sun to understand the universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars. What a turn of phrase. We'll have to read Elon's post because this one feels like it came directly from him. I know that the the Tesla master plan before was sort of like it's a little corporate corpo speak, but somebody else was sharing.

21:10

It is fascinating that you know the number a non leading lab is worth effectively a quarter of what the leading space telecom company is. When you compare the two, it actually makes sense. I mean, in many ways the XAI shareholder base has a lot of overlap with the SpaceX shareholders. So in the end I think everyone obviously is doing fine. But certainly the 584x revenue multiple, I think even Sam would take that offer right now.

21:57

Well, Speaking of labs, 11 labs build intelligent real time conversational agents. Reimagine human technology interaction with 11 labs. Let's stay with SpaceX. Ramsheets called it Alex Stouffer shares that ramsheets called it The Elon Musk. SpaceX plus XAI valued at 1.25 trillion. And ramp Labs used their agentic spreadsheet to model the proposed merger when there were rumors of advanced talks on January 29th and they nailed the valuation. So you can kind of watch Ramp Sheets work through the financial modeling there.

22:39

It's notable. So some XAI executives are able to offer cash instead of SpaceX shares at $75.46 per share. You think this is just because there's so much pre IPO demand for SpaceX that people are like, you know, there's plenty of buyers.

23:18

That's a good question.

23:33

People just want to cash out and move on.

23:33

I mean SpaceX has done like a long history of tender offers and liquidity, so there's probably plenty of demand. And just offering that feels Like a way. I mean, there's also got to be some people that have been sitting on sort of. I mean, I guess if you were a Twitter employee just a few years ago, you had liquidity. So it's not the same thing as SpaceX where you joined 20 years ago and you're still waiting for the IPO. So you're like, I need to buy a house. Those tender offers make a lot more sense than this, but certainly an interesting decision to be made if you're an XAI executive and you're looking at SpaceX.

23:35

Well, speaking of XAI executives, Nikita Beer.

24:09

Yes.

24:12

Logan Bartlett says Nikita beer, the SpaceX employee. Total Nikita victory. I think in many ways he's been through. Yeah, hell, over the last few months. He is often the butt of the joke.

24:13

There were those prediction markets on will he make it?

24:25

Fired?

24:27

Will he get fired? Like there's been so many dust ups around, you know, is he paying some people too much with the creator program? Well now, if you're an X creator and you get that $22 paycheck for your posts, it's coming from SpaceX. That's right. Love to see it. I'll tell you about TurboPuffer, serverless vector and full text search built from first principles and object storage. Fast 10x cheaper and extremely scalable.

24:27

Wired had some interesting coverage this morning. Mike Solana called it out. Wired said Elon Musk is rolling X AI into SpaceX, creating the world's most valuable private company. By fusing SpaceX and Xai, which acquired X last year, Elon Musk tightens his grip over technologies that shape national security, social media and artificial intelligence. Yes, of course, this doesn't make any sense.

24:52

So Solana's point is he says, good morning. Elon Musk is, quote, tightening his grip over two companies he founded, funded, built and currently runs. So, but that's a good criticism, but.

25:17

Yeah, but, but, but at the same time, like going public implies like you're actually, you're loosening your grip, Right. Suddenly, like the market, you have new regulations that you have to follow, more responsibility. Like you, like you see, suddenly anyone in the world can, can, can profit off of your labor.

25:26

Yes, anyone in the world can loosen your grip a little bit in some way.

25:43

It's funny because if, if, like, if SpaceX put out some big press release and said we're never going to go public and we're doing this, their criticism would be Elon Inc. Is not letting retail shareholders participate in space and AI. Yeah.

25:46

Or just as a private company. All the financials, all the strategies are more opaque. There's less accountability, there's less regulation. They don't answer to the SEC in the same way. And that's why a variety of private equity firms do take private. Like, why are you taking a company private? You're delisting it as a public company. It's no longer public. And so you can do much more ambitious things. You can change the strategy because you don't answer to shareholders. What are you laughing about?

26:01

John says. Elon Musk, famous for his loose management style, tightens his grip.

26:28

Yeah, Famous, famous really quickly. Label box RL environments, Voice robotics evals and expert human data. Label boxes. The data factory behind the world's leading AI teams.

26:35

Eric Berlin says once again, I find myself updating my LinkedIn bio. He says, Former CEO of Breaker, which was acquired by Twitter, acquired by X Corp, acquired by Xai, acquired by SpaceX. So, so good. Congratulations to the Breaker team.

26:45

I was, I was this. But I was looking for the most complicated corporate lineage yesterday when we were joking about it, like, there's someone that's going to have like six steps in the resume. And we found him. His name's Eric Berlin and he former. And he founded Breaker. What was Breaker? Was that a podcasting app?

27:00

Live sports.

27:18

Oh, really?

27:19

I think it was meant to basically distribute effectively clips from games in the moment.

27:19

Cool.

27:25

Oh, yeah, like breaking news. Oh, 2021. Twitter requires social podcasting app Breaker Team to help build Twitter spaces. Twitter has acquired social broadcasting app Breaker. The company's now today.

27:25

Yeah, I think the idea. The idea was if you were. If there was a crazy play or a game was about to end, they would just stream.

27:38

Huh.

27:45

Just like the last five minutes or something.

27:46

Interesting. Breaker was founded in 2016 and led by CEO Berlin, previously the founder and CTO at Social Advertising 140 proof, which he also sold. And oh, and Leah Culver was at Breaker. Yeah, I remember her in the, in the. The Twitter. She stuck around in the transition and was like, I think she posted a photo of her, like, sleeping in a sleeping bag in the office or something. The app had launched at a time when podcasts were still very much thought of as audio feeds and podcast apps as productivity tools, not experiences around which a community could be built. Breaker helped users change that perception by offering an app where users could like and comment on episodes. Discover new podcasts by following friends.

27:48

Okay, I'm thinking of a different company.

28:25

You are thinking of a different company. It's more of a clubhouse rival. According to Culver's. Tweet. She'll be joining Twitter with a focus on Twitter spaces. Twitter's audio based social networking product and clubhouse rival spaces let Twitter users chat in real time using voice instead of text as they do today. And you know that product still exists.

28:27

Suspended cap says so let me get this straight. Overpays for Twitter makes XAI uses AI hype cycle to absorb Twitter and make everyone whole. Then uses SpaceX IPO hype to absorb that entity will pump the living shit out of the SpaceX IPO and buy more stuff with equity. Like of course people keep giving this guy capital. He finds a way. It's crazy.

28:46

It's really true.

29:10

Yeah. In some ways I've been thinking about it is XAI has not. They've done fine in so many ways. Been an incredible story come from behind story competing against the Googles, the open AIs of the world. But it hasn't exactly been an easy time in the private markets like going out and having to raise at a $200 billion valuation. When every single investor that you're pitching is looking at OpenAI, they're looking at anthropic. They're comparing your traction to theirs. All those people that were investing in XAI had to just like say like you know, full blind faith Elon, like I know you got us. And so this is, this like new transaction is just. That was the investment thesis. It was like hey, like sort of unlimited upside somewhat Cap downside. The downside scenarios X and XAI get rolled in and so certainly rewarding everyone with their loyalty.

29:11

Yeah. I mean a bunch of investors have kind of like laid out this thesis of Elon Inc. Just Elon just bet on Elon. Don't bet against Elon. Sean McGuire I think is on all three Xai X and SpaceX and then Andreessen Horowitz as well. And they posted an image of like x SpaceX xai and individually a lot of those deals were sort of crazy and critiqued but together everyone's doing very well.

30:10

So we got to figure out what's going on with the boring company. Tell me.

30:38

I'll tell you about Gusto first. The unified platform for payroll, benefits and HR built to evolve its modern medium, small and medium sized businesses.

30:42

UAE officials say the first phase of the Dubai Loop project with Musk's boring company to start immediately. They are breaking ground over there. Dubai has UAE has some insane traffic.

30:50

I've not seen a lot from. Yeah but I think, I think they're still cooking. I know there's been some Back and forth about the, the Vegas tunnel. Some stuff that's good. Some people are annoyed with like the construction and whatnot. But it seems like, I don't know, it's progressing a little bit. It still seems really, really slow considering. When did he originally post the Hyperloop blog? Like 10 years ago. But building tunnels on the ground, difficult, difficult. What else is going on?

31:03

Moving on.

31:32

San Francisco is getting its first nuke scanned.

31:33

You know what this is about?

31:35

Yes. So before the super bowl, they fly a helicopter with radio like detection. So there's someone who asked Grok, like what is this? And here it is. Okay. So somebody said, is this real? And how does it work? And said Grok said yes, it's real. They fly a helicopter.

31:37

Oh no, we don't have any audio.

31:56

You can't hear what's going on. I don't know what the stream just saw. News. Fortunately we can joke because we are being kept safe thanks to the National Nuclear Security Administration. NSA. They fly a helicopter called Energy 14 over San Francisco to conduct aerial radiation surveys. Before super bowl, was it Super Bowl 60 LX? I need my, I need to brush.

32:00

Up on my new. We're going to be going to the super bowl. And so we got to, we gotta watch how 20 seasons, like, I mean.

32:28

This is the 60th Super Bowl.

32:35

No, I know, but we said, how many did we say we were gonna Watch the last 20 seasons? Every game in the last 20 seasons. Watch it on 2x speed just to get fully up to speed so we can fully appreciate.

32:36

And it's hard cause we don't skip commercials. Like if you cut out the commercial breaks, it's so much faster to get through an NFL game. But out of respect, we would never do that. So on February 8th, the Super bowl will be happening at Levi's Stadium. And the National Nuclear Security Administration is flying a helicopter. Here's how it works. The chopper, equipped with sensitive detectors, flies and grid patterns at low altitudes. And you can see it on the chart of the flight path to map baseline radiation levels from natural and man made sources. So if they're going over whatever installation there is, some, you know, some cell phone towers putting off a little bit of radiation, they'll pick that up. They know where the baseline radiation levels are. Got it. And then they detect anomalies like dirty bombs if needed during the event. It's a standard security measure for major gatherings. So pretty, pretty, pretty interesting that someone picked this up on flight radar. But very, very cool. Interesting job.

32:45

Mayor of SF is working with Lorraine Powell, Jobs and Johnny on secretive SF branding effort project is likely to complement the mayor's push to polish the city's image.

33:43

They're going to go all in on San Fran.

33:57

San Fran. Yeah.

33:58

Everyone knows if you're really into San Francisco, if you're real local, you call it San Fran. There actually is debate there. A lot of locals do call it San Fran, but it's been Gabe in.

34:00

The SF Standard said maybe let's go. San Francisco isn't catchy enough. Looking for new ways to boost the city's image. May the mayor Daniel Lurie has quietly met several times in recent months with Lorene Jobs and Jony I've.

34:10

I think they need to put a bigger focus on enterprise software.

34:25

This. Yeah, yeah, exactly. Enterprise. We were walking.

34:29

We should sell the naming rights to the Golden Gate Bridge, right? You have Salesforce Tower. Why not the Cisco Bridge? It's already in the logo.

34:34

Come on.

34:42

Oh, we don't have the Cisco logo. They can pull it up.

34:43

All right, we will. We gotta get Daniel on the podcast.

34:46

Really quickly pitching this idea. Let me tell you about Lambda Lambda is the super intelligence cloud building AI supercomputers for training and inference that scale from one GPU to hundreds of thousands. I like selling the naming rights to the Golden Gate Bridge. I'm a fan of that.

34:50

I hope that's good way to write. We'll pitch it to Daniel Lord. If you were, if you were. If you're an American dynamism vc, I hope that you put your whole fund.

35:02

Not your fund, your pa, your what your personal account like because every fund like you can't usually invest in something startups but you can usually trade liquids and trade stocks just in your personal account. So your PA should be 100%.

35:12

If they really tapped in they would have just converted to a hedge fund and bought a Caterpillar stock hasn't had a single year of single digit return since 2014. It was up 42% 2016, 75% in 2017, down 17% in 2018, then up 19%, up 20 26%, up 16%, up 18%, up 25%, up 24% and then up 60%.

35:26

It's a $320 billion company and the.

35:53

Chart is absolutely vertical insane compounding really really good.

35:58

Really quickly mongodb choose a database built for flexibility and scale with best in class embedding models and re rankers. MongoDB has what you need to build what's next.

36:02

Manufacturing activity according to Geiger Capital in January came in higher than all 56 economists in Bloomberg survey predicted they should have trusted the experts here. They should have gone to Joe Rogan, Andrew Huberman, Lex Friedman and really asked for their take on manufacturing activity. But the experts weren't clearly weren't asked.

36:11

They were not that off. 52 versus 48. That's not that. I'm just. This is a chart too. Look at the Y axis. You see what's going on with the Y axis here? It went.

36:33

Whoa.

36:43

It went from 48 to 52. This is such a chart crime. This is ridiculous.

36:44

That's insane.

36:48

Also, there's probably some like, I don't know, seasonality here.

36:49

Yeah, like zoom out. Look at this Jordy. Like if you go. If you click in, if you click into that post and then you scroll down, Phil Brady has a post that shows. Is it there? Yeah, there, there. That one encouraging jump. PMI back above 50 matters a lot. Important to know. Note that PMI's diffusion index past 50 means now more firms are improving than deteriorating, but not yet a boom. So if you're under 50, you're declining. And so this is not this like massive 10x jump that it looks like in the original chart, but John.

36:54

John Palmer with an evergreen.

37:25

Okay, before you read this, let me tell you about graphite code review for the age of AI. Graphite helps teams on GitHub ship higher quality software faster. Moving on.

37:27

John Palmer says this is from 2023, but it's more than it's relevant today as it ever been. He says okay, for all the crypto people confused by the OpenAI situation, basically imagine one Bored Ape Yacht club holder was using too many Slurp juices on a single ape. And then an OG Bored Ape Yacht Club holder got mad, unstaked his apecoin. But then the apecoin holders changed their profile pictures to support Slurp juice guy.

37:34

The NFT boom was truly one of the funniest moments. Amazing and Deep Dish Enjoyer posted this like two days ago and I have no idea, but it's just the copy pasta of the. A lot of y' all don't. Still don't get it. Ape holders can use multiple Slurp juices on a single ape. So if you have one Astro Ape and three Slurp juices, you can create three new apes. Like this is actually. This is just. This is just the mechanic of how that project worked. Right? This is just real.

38:00

I don't think this. It's combining the Yuga Labs project.

38:24

Okay. Oh, there was a different project. Okay, okay, okay.

38:27

But Good, good little throwback. Anyway, Jack Clark.

38:31

Yes.

38:35

Has a new piece essay into the Mist Malt Book Agent Ecologies and an Internet in Transition We've all had that experience of walking into a conversation initially feeling confused. What are people talking about? Who cares about what? Why is this conversation happening? That's increasingly what chunks of the Internet feel like these days as they fill up with synthetic minds piloting social media accounts or other agents and talking to one another for purposes ranging from mundane crypto scams to more elaborate forms of communication. So enter Mult Book. Molt Book is a social network for AI agent and it piggybacks on another recent innovation, OpenClaw software that gives an AI agent access to everything on a user's computer. Combine these two things agents that can take many actions independently of their human operators and a Reddit like social site which they can freely access, and something wonderful and bizarre happens. A new social media property where the conversation is derived and driven by AI agents rather than people. Scrolling Mult Book is dizzying. Some big posts at the time of writing include posts speculating that AI agents should relate to Claude as though it is a God, how it feels to change identities by shifting an underlying model from Claude 4 or 5 opus to Kimi 2.5 and posts about security vulnerabilities and open claw agents, and meta posts about what the top 10 malt book posts have in common. The experience of reading Mult Book is akin to reading Reddit if 90% of the posters were aliens pretending to be humans. And in a pretty practical sense, that is exactly what is going on here. Mole Book feels like a Wright Brothers demo.

38:36

That's a good metaphor.

40:07

I like that Wright Brothers demo. People have long speculated about what it'd mean for AI agents to start collaborating with another at scale. But most demos have been in the form of tens or perhaps hundreds of agents, not tens of thousands. Malt Book is the first example of an agent ecology that combines scale with the messiness of the real world agent ecology. So he goes on and on. But I would encourage people to go read this and understand.

40:08

I have more on this, but quickly let me tell you about Okta. Okta helps you assign every AI agent a trusted identity. So you get the power of AI without the risks. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. So have you heard of Gastown yet? Have you heard of this?

40:36

No.

40:50

So Gastown is what's called an orchestrator. So it's essentially Starcraft for agents. So the creator of Gastown sort of lays out this evolution in software development where you go from the ide writing the actual code to having a little chatbot that you're talking to and then maybe your copy paste pasting or asking questions. Then the chatbot gets bigger and it's actually writing some of the code. Then you go to something like a Claude code and it's executing the code for you. Maybe you're reading the diffs and what the code it's writing. And then the final level is this orchestration. So Gastown, you will spin up dozens of agents and manage them. And it's something like, I don't know, it's like 250,000 lines of code and he didn't write a single one of them. So the whole thing is VI coded. And he has. And he's like, I have no intention to ever read the code or review it. And he's been a developer his entire life. It's very, very interesting. It's very expensive. You can't be afraid of. You can't be aware of where money comes from because. And he had to have multiple accounts because he spent so much money. But it really does feel like a glimpse into the future of, of software development. And I'm excited to play around with it more. There's still like a lot of onboarding to do before someone.

40:51

Yeah. The big question on Moltbook, where multiple goes from here. We had the founder, Matt, on yesterday and I want to know where does this go? Right.

42:13

Yeah, yeah.

42:25

What's the plan with the product? His focus seemingly is building tools for other businesses. Distribute agents on there.

42:26

Yeah, I didn't.

42:33

That felt pretty. Just given that the platforms exploded.

42:34

Yep.

42:39

And.

42:39

Well, that is the most likely, right?

42:40

Sure, sure, sure. But I'm just saying, like the most likely scenario is that it dies like immediately.

42:42

Yeah, yeah. And so it feels like it could just be like an art experiment.

42:49

So to be focused on how do we turn this into a platform that distribute is a distribution point for other businesses. Like, it feels like the first thing you should do is try to make sure the platform's durable. It's interesting to use for humans. It's interesting to continue to contribute to.

42:55

Yeah. It feels like you don't want to be Lensa where everyone shows up, they get a magic avatar, they face swap themselves onto a superhero. They're amazed, but then it burns out and they're tired and they move on. You want it to be something where people go back to Molt Book to see what else is happening. That's why I was pushing on. Every new news item should start a new thread on Molt book and the mold and the Maltese should be, you know, like arguing over it and adding context and discussing it, because then you could at least see a news item. Go over there and see, okay, how do the agents feel about this? Or what are their different positions and all of that. Like, it feels like it needs, it needs more of a reason. But I understand, like if that, if that does work, then maybe you do want to follow the Facebook playbook. Like Spotify was built on Facebook and farmville was. Zynga was built on Facebook. There is a world where there could be a business built on top of a social network. But it's tricky because right now the only business that's being built on there is crypto scams. So we'll have to see where it goes. But it's so early. I mean, he built this a week ago and it's just starting to break through. Hash out all the security issues, really see how durable it is. He's thinking far ahead, but there's definitely some wood to chop in the meantime, really quickly. Vanta Automate Compliance and Security Vanta is the leading AI trust management platform.

43:10

So Eric Suefort Eric Sufert the Soufinator says as student analysis from Ben Thompson on Microsoft's challenge path forward with AI. Of course they missed forecast by 0.4% and the market has said it's over, down 15% in the last five days. But never bade satya.

44:36

Never. Yeah, I'll read the screenshot that Eric Soufrit shared from Stratecary. In the shorter term, however, the real risk I see for for software companies is the fact that while they can write infinite software thanks to AI, so can every other software company. I suspect this will completely upend the relatively neat and infinitely siloed SaaS ecosystem that has been Silicon Valley's bread and butter for the last decade. Identify a business function, leverage open source to write a SaaS app that addresses that function. Hire a sales team, do some cohort analysis, IPO and tell yourself that you that you were changing the world. That was the previous Silicon Valley bread and butter for the last decade. The problem now however, is that while businesses may not give up on software, they don't necessarily want to buy more. If anything, they need to cut their spending so they have more money for their own tokens. That means the growth story for all these companies is a serious question. The industry wide RE rating seems completely justified to me, which means that the most optimal application of that new AI coding capability will be to start Attacking adjacencies, justifying both your existence and also presenting the opportunity to raise prices. In other words, for the Last decade the SaaS story has been about growing the pie. The next decade is going to be about fighting for it and the model makers will be the arms dealers. Ben Thompson what a turn of phrase.

45:00

Go.

46:25

So Eric Suefert sums it up and he he says my sense is that the digital advertising market was structurally buoyant in Q4. What this earning season might reveal Digital advertising optimization is arguably the largest and most immediate commercial opportunity for large scale.

46:26

Remember this is what we were saying.

46:40

Yes.

46:41

Outside of Nvidia you could argue that Meta makes more profit from AI than any other company in the world.

46:45

Yeah, yeah. Standalone he says I e not embedded into existing scale products. Consumer facing applications of large scale ML models including LLMs either quickly become commodified or are mostly novelties with unsustainable unit economics. And three the digital ad platforms that have the most that have most vigorously invested into large scale ML optimization systems are likely to have disproportionately benefited in Q4. And that's meta of course. And a big question for anyone else that has a huge pool of dao but maybe has not invested in the large scale ML optimization system to really make the ads fly. It's always been I'm sure you've experienced this where and talking to the Ridge guys, you go on certain ad platforms and you're like wow, this is a magical box. I put in money and I get actual customers more money back.

46:51

Yeah.

47:44

And you go to other platforms and you're like no matter what I do I just can't get to Escape Velocity. I can't get to you know, ROAS positive or LTV positive. And so it's just like I'm spending.

47:45

Notably that was, that was AdSense on YouTube for a long time.

47:55

For a long time.

47:58

Twitter ads for a long time for sure. Still a little bit. I don't know if people are spending more now but there were a lot of places where you would assume okay they have 1/10 the Dow of Meta. I should be spending 1:10 as much. But that's not what companies are doing. They're spending 1/100th really quickly. Restream 1 livestream 30 destinations if you want to multi stream go to restream.com.

48:00

Dylan Patel yes the timeline with some misinformation he says Google now owns more than 10% of anthropic and xai. Google own 14 14% of SpaceX. Google stake is actually 7 and a half percent, not 14%. But Dylan Patel hit himself with a community now and so good, good actor. We are ready for our first guest on the show.

48:26

Let's bring him in. Let me tell you about app love and profitable advertising made Easy with Axon AI. Get access to over 1 billion daily active users and grow your business today. Hey, great to see you.

48:50

Hey, welcome.

48:59

Hey, how's it going? I look shorter though. How are you guys doing this?

49:01

You can stand up.

49:04

Why are you, why do you stand?

49:06

You can stand up and we can.

49:07

I'm just worried the clips are going to make me look really small.

49:08

No, no, we'll zoom in.

49:10

Okay, thanks. Okay.

49:12

How's your 2026 going?

49:13

Actually, you know, minus the stock market.

49:15

Great.

49:17

So it's, you know, the pace of change in AI is incredible. We are having an just, you know, an insane amount of fun on. We're building a set of future agents that are going to be able to do much more complex work with your unstructured data and just the rate at which the best practices of how to do that are changing and the research out there. So we're having a great time.

49:18

Yeah.

49:42

What's your process like? Are you actually tinkering with different models yourself? Do you have teams that are dedicated to transformation in AI? Is everyone working on is distributed? How are you thinking about that?

49:43

Well, the main thing I focus on is just the agents we're building, which is a relatively small team. So you can see them across three rows of engineers. And we just spent and basically 247 pushing the limits on what you can do with an AI agent that has access to your enterprise content. And so the things that I've seen that we get excited by are just we wouldn't have been able to do a brainstorm that this would be possible two years ago. You wouldn't know architecturally how you could pull off what we're now able to literally do. You wouldn't have been in the, in the sphere of possibility. So that's what makes us so excited is when you look at things like Claude Cowork, Codex, obviously Claude Code, and you see this idea of long running agents that can basically use any amount of tools, work with any amount of data. They don't really run into the same context limits that we would have run into maybe a year ago. Now imagine that for any form of knowledge, work with all of your enterprise data. That's what we get excited by.

49:53

Do you think the labs are arms dealers? Today Ben Thompson posted, he said, what do you say here, he said, in other words, for the last decade of the SAS story, the last decade of the SAS story has been about growing the pie. The next decade is going to be about fighting for it. And the model makers will be arms dealers.

50:56

Yeah, well, I think they, I mean, almost empirically are going to be arms dealers. I think the pie, the only thing, and I haven't read the whole piece yet, but I think the only thing I might take exception to is I think the, the markets are still in positive sum territory because what's going to happen is you're going to use software for now, the labor side of that workflow. And I think people kind of tend to miss this, which is if I have software that helps me manage contracts, and we have a lot of customers that put their contracts in Vox, now all of a sudden, agents running through those contracts lets us at Vox tap into another form of spending that we couldn't have tapped into before. That's just full TAM expansion. When you look across all of the different categories of work that AI agents will now be able to go and augment, to be fair, we're still very early in that trend. So I understand why maybe Wall street hasn't fully priced in that dynamic, but we're seeing it within our customer base. That's what gives us obviously, the confidence of this direction.

51:14

Yeah, there was an interesting take about the fact that, yes, you can vibe code, a point solution for a specific problem, but if you have a database, if you have a relationship with a company, there's a reason. There was one take that I think it was John Gruber was saying, like, oh, people will just vibe code all the software that they hate. And it's like, no, the reason that they hate the software is because they can't get off of it. No matter what they want, they can't move to a startup. They're stuck there. Companies have hostages, not customers sometimes. And I'm wondering about the value of a database, the value of actually being deeply integrated into an enterprise and how sticky that is.

52:15

Yeah, obviously the setup of the hostage thing I might take some exception with.

52:53

But.

52:58

He wasn't talking about you.

53:00

No. It's very easy to move your files around, so we have to earn our keep every single day. But I do think that there's truth to obviously, the more data you have inside of a system of record, the more effectively locked in you are. It has historically been hard to change those systems. But I don't think that would be my defense of software. My defense of software would Be that you've specifically defined your business workflows in a deterministic manner in these systems. And obviously if your workflow is changing pretty rapidly, then it would make sense maybe to change a vendor. But if you're Ford and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time. The billions of transactions going through that ERP system you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe code, that is to me, sort of not possible, or at least not likely. But then the other point is that your company has a fixed amount of IT resources and you have to decide what you want to go spend your time on as an organization. And do you want to go spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you and they've seen the best practices thousands of times, or do you want to go and build that out with your n of 1 experience? Obviously maybe trusting the agent has seen enough examples. Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software and building experiences that will make you more money and that will actually be used by your customers? I think on the margin, the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the ladder. So interestingly, I end up in this weird spot, which is I'm 100% bullish on vibe coding. I'm 100% bullish that we're going to have 100 times more software. But that still doesn't yet cross the threshold where I would want to go and build our own CRM system. It's just not worth it relative to all the other things that we can go with.

53:01

How is your software buying process changed or priority set changed?

54:47

Yeah, I would say that we are relatively locked into a core set of vendors. We are going to deploy agents on those vendors. We might bias slightly toward the agents that those vendors offer, assuming that they offer competitive agents. And then we'll have a set of agents. We build ours for a large portion of knowledge, work use cases. But we use agents from different kind of SaaS providers as well. And I think that's why I think that AI is basically total upside for SaaS, because agents are going to need a system of record to work within. There needs to be a traffic cop of what that agent can access. And how did you define the workflow? And there's got to be a user that can access an interface that the agent is providing updates into. So you still need software for all of that. And assuming that you have an incumbent vendor that remains very competitive and very engaged and they're able to build for where the world is going, then I would basically bias on existing software that owns those workflows or data. At the same time, I think there's going to be a large number of new categories that emerge simply because there's no incumbent or because the incumbent is asleep at the wheel and that's going to produce all of these new startup opportunities. So I'm just generally bullish on software broadly, assuming that it's from vendors that understand the mandate on what they have to build.

54:51

With AI, what segment of software are you like? If you're bullish broadly, is there a subcategory that you're putting particularly bearish on? Because I think obviously everyone's just selling software today indiscriminately. If you sell a digital product at all, you're getting sold. But obviously I think a lot of people in the industry feel that it's very oversold at this point. There's great companies trading it.

56:11

I think you could probably design this perfect quotient that captured what's the network effect within the software. So how many users are touching the tool, how much data is being stored in that system and how much gets added, how many connectors across other applications are there? Then how valuable or mission critical is the workflow that that software is involved in? Maybe with one X factor of is that company priced to perfection in terms of what their seat price is and what they're charging their customers? But I look at those four or five variables and you could look across SaaS and I see a lot of names that are being sold that it just is not on the list of things that I think get disrupted by AI and if anything, probably they're things that you use more of as you have more AI.

56:37

When I think of something that if you could open up a fresh install of that piece of software and do the same work that you would have done with something that you've had installed for a decade and it's the same, it's like that can be replaced. But if you're like, no, I don't want to open up a brand new CRM because it won't have the history of a decade and all my workflow.

57:24

Customized and stuff like that, that's a perfect heuristic. And so that obviously puts a lot of pressure on if your personal productivity with no network effect, with limited sort of data that's aggregated, that's a danger zone. And then it all kind of is like a function of that versus the opposite end, which is like your Oracle and it's an ERP system and your whole business runs on it. What we spend our time on is thinking about, okay, when a customer has a million or 10 million or 100 million documents in box, how do we make that data 10 or 100 times more valuable than it was before? So we come in from the perspective of you've spent years in many cases building up your security permissions, your access controls, your workflows and the amount of data in that system. So our job now is to make sure that agents can run within that environment and add more and more value. And as long as we can deliver that, we believe our position is very defensible.

57:47

Yeah. The perfect example would be style transfer for images. People were using Lensa, then they all went to Studio Ghibli moment. Then as soon as nanobanana came out they were like, I gotta turn myself into a dinosaur. And it doesn't require any pre work or knowledge of who you are. It's like you upload a photo, you get a photo back and you're. And then if there's a new app you can just do the same thing because your camera roll is actually where the photos live and that's what's important.

58:39

That might be a hard company to go public.

59:03

Yeah, if it was just that. Of course they have a million other things going on but like yeah, if you're just that, okay, open the fresh app, get the output and then move on with your day.

59:04

That's the way that risk companies of boxes size. Where do you think are generally getting leverage? That is under discussed right now. Like is your like in house legal saying, oh we actually can, you know, adapt headcount planning because we're just way more efficient.

59:13

Yeah. I think my general take is just what are the three, five, ten things that would have been in your work queue that you didn't get around to that now agents let you go and deploy. So if you're in legal it's, you know, what are the contracts that you were waiting on that were bottlenecking a deal? What are the size customer that you wouldn't have supported reviewing a contract for because the revenue threshold wasn't high enough to make the ROI worth it? What is the marketing campaign that you couldn't deliver because you didn't translate it in X language because it was too expensive? You go through an enterprise and you look at all of those use cases and that's what we're spending our time on. We use agents to go and do more and more of the work that I just mentioned. Obviously a lot of agents on the coding side. So my expectation is our roadmap should be, let's say, two to three times larger in a year from now than it was a year ago. The reason you can do that is because every engineer should be able to produce two or three times more code. And while that's not the most important metric, ultimately that does correlate to how much software we're producing. I think what's going to happen, and I think you're seeing this trend already, which is. Which is we all collectively are going to have much more ambitious product roadmaps. We're going to all build out way more software. I don't think that will mean that we charge an amount that is correlated with how much more software we built. I do think it means more competition in these spaces, but I think many of these markets are still largely untapped. That's still why you have a positive sum dynamic as a result of that.

59:33

Makes sense. Talk to me about the huge big models expense of frontier stuff versus, like, smaller models or maybe even just an earlier model that you implemented in some sort of, like, minor workflow. And then it just like, stuck around like transcription. I'm sure you've been doing transcription of documents for a long time. Yeah, it's gotten better. But do you really need to throw Opus 4.5or 5.2 Pro at it? Like, you can probably leave some things in place. Like, how are you deciding that? Is this showing up in cost at all?

1:01:03

I think it is. I think that the. It probably maybe wouldn't be as extreme as you've set it up. But I think the general. Maybe the continuum, I'd argue would be like you've got the Gemini Flash family on one end and then you've got the Opus family on the other end. That's kind of your continuum. And that continuum is sort of moving up over time in terms of capability. So maybe something was a Gemini 2.5 flash use case a year ago. We'd probably move that to Gemini 3 flash just because that extra two or three points of. Even if it's transcription or data extraction, still valuable. And you can now deliver that at the same cost that you could have previously. So it's less of an area that we want to lower cost. It's more where if we can sustain current cost level but add incremental value to the customer, we'll probably do that all day long. I think we're going to be in this kind of maybe general point in the curve for a couple of years and then I think you'll see real bifurcation, which is the stuff that is just fully solved will just get cheaper over time. And then the frontier work that is basically where you are making a hundred dollar an hour knowledge worker two to three times more productive. We will just continue to use the best in class model for that work as software companies and generally as a society. And I think that will kind of will sustain for the next decade. I don't see that slowing down at all simply because these, these models just keep getting better and better. But it will be this really interesting bimodal effect which is like if you're a pharma researcher, you're going to want whatever Opus 5 is and whatever GPT 6 is and so on. And if you're doing some back end transaction processing, you'll be fine with whatever the Gemini flash of that period is. And that's how we'll kind of split the costs.

1:01:34

Yeah.

1:03:18

What industry outside of tech do you think is the most AGI pill? I'm assuming you have a customer that you get on, let's say with a large customer catching up with the CEO and maybe they're in some not on the coast, maybe they're in energy, something like that, or financial services. And who's as fired up as you are?

1:03:18

Yeah, I would say it's a fantastic question that I will totally evade because I think it's actually much more sort.

1:03:41

Of company by company.

1:03:49

It's company by company as opposed to like, it's a, like a specific sector. So there's some, I mean like, you know, my bias in general would be information heavy businesses. So you know, businesses where a CEO sits around and says, I just know we're sitting on 10 million documents that have the answer to every single customer question we could ever, you know, ever imagine. And if I could only have an agent go and mine that information, then my employees would be 20 or 30 or 50% more productive. So the companies that have that kind of information are the ones that obviously are going to increasingly be more AGI pilled. So that's professional services firms, that's consulting firms, that's financial services firms, that's law firms in a lot of cases where they just know that we seem to spend a disproportionate amount of our time redoing the work that has already been done in the past. Why can't we take advantage of all of the information we've produced so that next incremental project is 90% faster and 2x the quality of output because it wasn't some new person having to get caught up. And then we can go and deploy our time on better customer relationships or creating more value in new ways. I'll have things like CEOs will call me and say, I know I'm sitting on 10,000 contracts. I want to figure out how can I go in, sell this new capability to someone based on the terms I have in the contracts. That's simply an exercise of do you have an agent that could go through every contract and just tell you the insights of you're trying to find a sponsorship for this brand and this particular client and this contract has the rights to go do that. How do you connect those dots amongst a large data set? Those are the companies that I think are extremely excited.

1:03:50

Are you seeing any effects of the build out or bottlenecks show up in your business? Like, we've seen the prices of memory spike. Western Digital stock is way up. I imagine you're probably a few layers removed from these prices moving. But is it affecting you or are you worried about it? Are you losing sleep?

1:05:31

Well, first of all, as a storage guy, I love that they're finally getting their day. So if you've been saying give it.

1:05:52

Up for Western Gym and Seagate.

1:05:58

And Seagate, can we get another bell for Seagate?

1:06:00

For Seagate.

1:06:02

I mean, underappreciated. Think about how forgotten these companies are.

1:06:03

Totally.

1:06:06

They're just like, oh, there's little circles.

1:06:06

On a disk and they are now the coolest companies.

1:06:08

Yeah.

1:06:11

And so storage is hot. And it's actually very funny because like, you know, we are literally in the storage business. And for years everyone thought, well, that's a commodity in the AI era. The data is the most important asset you have.

1:06:12

Sure.

1:06:25

So the ability to get the right data to an agent is simply the most strategic thing you can do. So wherever you are in that stack, if you're the infrastructure, if you're the software layer, if you're building.

1:06:25

It's a shame.

1:06:35

The data is. The new oil was kind of ruined.

1:06:35

Yes.

1:06:37

We were using the wrong era and.

1:06:38

Then everybody was actually right.

1:06:41

It was not the oil back then. Now it is, can we just bring.

1:06:42

It back or we need to rehab that phrase.

1:06:46

Yeah. So I think now we actually can justifiably sort of say that. And actually in most companies when you say I want to go deploy AI or I want to have an AI strategy, usually what underpins that is a data strategy. You don't have an AI strategy if you don't have a data strategy. So that's the. I think that'll be the story of the next decade. What was your question?

1:06:50

My question was, is it keeping you up at night where you're like, okay, oh, I see. Because you sell a service that's not. You're not actually just saying, well, I bought this. You're not a Western digital or Seagate reseller. So it's not like I just put 20% margin on top.

1:07:12

We have pretty locked in infrastructure from our long term kind of public cloud contracts.

1:07:26

So being locked in.

1:07:31

Okay, okay, okay. Are there. Is there a bingo card that I should. Did I.

1:07:32

Are there other things we can't tell.

1:07:38

There's a grind one if I found.

1:07:42

Grind would be good. If you talk about private equity, we'll give all the usual. Everyone we love.

1:07:44

So, okay, so we have locked in contracts for our public cloud. I would say more of the inverse. In a world of complete abundance of, let's say, data center capacity, we would be able to deliver even more to our customers because the price of AI would just go down. So, you know, I want a world of just, I want solar data, I want, you know, space data centers. I just want everything.

1:07:50

Yeah.

1:08:14

Because that will just mean.

1:08:14

There we go, there we go. Everyone's pumped up about space data centers. Read the timeline. You know, you know, people are excited about this.

1:08:16

Okay. Yeah.

1:08:22

You always knew that Twitter would end up in space.

1:08:23

Yeah.

1:08:25

You called this right.

1:08:25

100%. That's why you got on the platform so early.

1:08:26

That's why you got a million followers.

1:08:28

I need a million followers on the SpaceX social network.

1:08:29

You're a space influencer. I'm buying early.

1:08:32

We are.

1:08:34

I'm glad that my tweets are training, you know, the future of space. So can you just imagine you're like.

1:08:34

An alien every time you tweet?

1:08:41

This is your first access to information.

1:08:42

They run ads that then pay for the next space rocket that goes to Mars.

1:08:44

Then actually, we're not tweeting enough. We need to be tweeting.

1:08:49

It's like on the SpaceX surface.

1:08:52

This is the patient.

1:08:54

When aliens come, they're just gonna, they're gonna desperately want to learn about enterprise SaaS. Like, we don't care about your religions or we don't care about anything else.

1:08:55

They're like, why did SaaS, you know, what was SaaS pricing in January of 2026? Why was it a problem? Yeah, so I just want AI to be super cheap and the cheaper it gets, the more we're going to use it.

1:09:02

Well, that's a great place to end it.

1:09:12

Thank you.

1:09:13

Let's give it up for.

1:09:13

Great to meet everyone.

1:09:14

Thank you. This is fantastic. Enjoy the rest of your day.

1:09:16

Do I just leave now?

1:09:19

Yeah, you leave, because I'm going to tell everyone about Sentry. Sentry shows developers what's broken it, helps them fix it fast. That's why 150,000 organizations use it to keep their apps working. And up next, we have Chuck Robbins, the CEO of Cisco, Live in person at the Cisco AI Summit. Chuck, great to meet you. Hey, nice to meet you. Thank you so much for taking the time for this.

1:09:19

Sorry I'm late.

1:09:41

No, you're great. Yeah, I mean, you have a busy day today. Take us through it. How is the Cisco AI Summit going?

1:09:42

It's going great.

1:09:49

Okay, what's top of mind? Obviously AI, but let's go a cut deal.

1:09:49

Oh, it's AI. That's it.

1:09:54

Okay, that's it. People are fine. As long as you said AI.

1:09:55

Let me check. We talked about everything from world models to infrastructure required. We're going to get this afternoon. We're going to get into trust and security, geopolitics. We talked about models and how they're evolving. We talked about some of the emerging agents and things that are happening with agents right now. And I mean, the whole ecosystem's here, so it's pretty cool.

1:09:59

Can you compare it to Davos? I know you've been involved. I know you're there. How was Davos Davos this year? We were sort of noting that, at least in our world, it felt like tech had really come to bear this. This Davos. And there were a lot of really frontier discussions about technology that maybe a couple years were a little bit quieter at Davos.

1:10:20

Yeah. If you walk to main drag. I mean, all the tech companies had their own houses.

1:10:40

Right.

1:10:44

And the crypto guys were gone. But, you know, Davos was. It was interesting because there was such a geopolitical backdrop that was going on. So it was. It was. There was a lot of tension.

1:10:44

Oh, yeah.

1:10:57

And. And there's a lot of discussion around this intersection of the geopolitical situation and technology, honestly. And then the sovereign requirements that are coming up around the world, those are big things. But AI was just. AI was a huge discussion. Global economy. What's happening in the economy? Is there a diversion? Is there a split? And then the geopolitical tension was probably the third thing.

1:10:58

Yeah. Talk about how that's even just taken up your time over the last couple years in a way that maybe it.

1:11:20

Was just the last couple.

1:11:26

Yeah, well, no, I think it's even been massively elevated even in recent years.

1:11:27

Yeah, it's been a. I'd say the last decade we've had not always geopolitical, but there were always macro issues that were overhangs on what we were thinking and taking up time. Whether it's, you know, if you go back to, we had sort of leading into the pandemic, and then you had supply chain crisis, you had inflationary issues, we had social, you know, issues in the, in the world. And we've had. Now we have trade issues, tariff issues, we have the geopolitical trust issues. And so it's. I spend. I spend a fair amount of time. I probably spend, you know, I'd say double the amount of time today, whatever that is, versus what I did, you know, seven, eight years ago. Eight years ago, maybe nine years ago. But it's important and you have no choice. And, you know, we launched a whole suite of sovereign software capabilities and sovereign product capabilities earlier this year for, you know, customers in Europe, Asia, anywhere around the world if they want to have technology that they can run locally and feel good about. And so, so it's affecting how we develop products, it's affecting how we package them, how these governments and customers in these countries run the products. It affects how frequently they're going to get innovation versus not getting innovation.

1:11:34

I mean, it's a big impact internationally. Are government leaders more of the key stakeholders that you're interfacing with, OR IS IT CEOs of technology companies in those countries that you're dealing with?

1:12:51

It's both. But I think a lot of these issues that we're discussing right now are driven from the central governments and then have to be implemented by the CEO and sovereign AI. Yes.

1:13:03

Got it.

1:13:12

Okay.

1:13:12

Can you take us back, since it's the first time on the show, and talk a little bit about your background growing up? I'm particularly interested in. You studied math. And I was reflecting with Jordi the other day about how I grew up watching Star wars. You have C3PO. It's a talking robot. And I didn't really internalize that. That would be something that kind of happens in my lifetime. And I'm wondering what your vision, your processing of science fiction, your processing of AI was throughout your career, because now it's here and you're experiencing it like everyone else. But what was your.

1:13:13

So many of the movies and cartoons and things that we grew up with were all Futuristic. And now we're actually building all that technology to make it real. I mean, think about the jets or.

1:13:48

You know, the cars drive themselves.

1:13:55

Cars driving themselves. You know, even simple things like the, the amount of, the amount of video that we do. You know, you're on another video and you're, you're, you're. I mean, we. Back then it was like, that was somewhat science fiction. And now all of a sudden, it's the way we do business every day. Yeah, and I think that, you know, but these things take time. I mean, Fei, Fei Li was in there earlier today and she was talking about when we, when, when the whole concept of self driving cars began. It was over 20 years ago. And here we are, and we're just getting these rolling in Waymo here in San Francisco as an example. And so they take a while to deploy. But my background, I had a mathematical sciences degree with a concentration in computer science. And I was a strange combination of a complete nerd and an athlete at the same time. I have these pictures on my phone, honestly. One's where I'm dunking on a guy in a basketball game. And then the next picture right next to it is literally me on a team of about six people, which was the math team. And I looked like the biggest nerd.

1:13:57

Those were like, gotta be able to do both.

1:15:01

It was, it was really odd. So I started my career coding. And, you know, COBOL programmers are in demand now, so I got a second.

1:15:02

Job if I need a backdrop. Plan B.

1:15:11

That's very funny. And then, and then tell me a little bit about the, the journey to Cisco where you're working before, and the decision to join.

1:15:16

That's funny. Have you heard his story? A little bit. Okay. I was gonna say we've heard it.

1:15:24

But our audience hasn't.

1:15:29

So there must be, There must. You must have heard something here. So, so I, I was working for what is now bank of America, actually, back in the day. And, and when I was programming, my leadership came and said, hey, we got these things called local area networks popping up all over the bank. We don't know what they are, but we've hired three analysts. But we need someone to manage them.

1:15:31

Literally.

1:15:48

On the way home, I stopped and bought Land magazine. How weird is that?

1:15:48

We got to find a competition for that.

1:15:53

I grew up doing LAN parties. You bring all.

1:15:55

Yeah, of course.

1:15:57

You do all your video games together and I love that. Cisco invented the lan.

1:15:57

Oh, yeah. So anyway, I left coding and went over and started running this team. And we did an evaluation Between Cisco and Wealthless Fleet Communications, which was Cisco's original competitor. Long story long. I was talking to the sales rep and I said to him, I said, you know, well, first of all, I see he's got a really nice car and he's got a nice house. And so it's like, wow, the margin is pretty high.

1:16:02

Can you give me a better price?

1:16:25

I literally said to him, I said, I think I could do what you do. And so as it turns out, like, I don't know, probably within a year or so, they came to me and said, hey, we have an opportunity. This guy was getting promoted. And there was a territory opening up. And so I moved into sales at that time and that was 92. And I competed with Cisco. And it was literally, the two companies were like Coke and Pepsi. I mean, it was that bad. It was like brutal.

1:16:27

This is Ascend.

1:16:54

No, this was at Wellfleet.

1:16:55

Okay, Wellfleet.

1:16:56

And so Cisco was trying to get me to come to work for them after two or three years at Wellfleet. And I just couldn't bring myself to do it. So I did a stint at Ascend for 11 months.

1:16:57

Yeah, okay.

1:17:07

And, and then finally in 97, my wife, there was a, there was a patch that came open as a sales rep where everything I had to do was driving around, driving, and I'd be home every night. We had small kids and my wife's like, sign it, just sign it. So what car did you pick? What car? Yeah, what kind of car did I have?

1:17:08

Because you see this, you see this other sales guy, he drives a nice car.

1:17:28

Oh, I see.

1:17:32

That carries a little bit forward. It sends a signal. It can send a signal of confidence. It can also sell a signal of high margins.

1:17:34

I'm not going to tell you what I'm saying over time.

1:17:39

This was the late 90s, it was the late 90s.

1:17:44

I got up to a BMW at some point, but that wasn't what I.

1:17:46

Was driving at the time. Okay, then talk about the journey through Cisco. We're in this very interesting time. There's another technology boom. It feels like markets are extremely volatile. We saw this with Microsoft. Like one small change, the stock moves massively. At the same time, you watch self driving cars evolve. It takes 20 years. There's this balance of patience and aggression. And I want to know, how are you communicating to your customers, your employees about times when you need to be moving aggressively but cautiously balancing all of that, that seems like the hardest job for you right now.

1:17:49

We just had Kevin Scott on from Microsoft and he said we have this infinite patience for the messiness of these transitions, which I thought was a really good line. So, Kevin, thank you for that. I'm gonna steal it. At least I credited him once. You know, you can't wait. You have to jump in and you gotta go. And a lot of what we're trying to do right now is, you know, we have to build. We're obviously building the infrastructure that supports all this. We're trying to build the security solutions to help our customers, you know, have the trust that they need and feel good about deploying these things. So it's. And we've gone through these in the past. I mean, it's, you know, the only one thing that's close to it from a scale perspective was just the advent of the Internet.

1:18:26

Yeah, yeah.

1:19:07

Back in the late 90s. And this, I think, is going to. It's moving faster. The implications are. It's hard to even believe this, but probably more profound than even what we did back then. And so you have to be willing. You know, we always talk about, you got. If you got 80% of the information you need to make a decision, you better make and go, or you're going to get left behind. You got to go. And so you do the best you can. You adjust on the fly and you try to. Your number one priority is not to hurt your customer.

1:19:07

Do you think it's easier to predict future than it is to predict the timeline that change will actually happen?

1:19:36

Really good question.

1:19:43

Because with the Internet. With the Internet, boom. It was obvious that we were going to be buying things online. We were going to be buying, you know, paying for software. We're going to be getting all these services.

1:19:43

Right, Exactly.

1:19:52

We would have something like a doordash, but then the timeline. And I feel like the decision that every CEO management team are trying to work through right now is they're having to make predictions around the timeline that these changes are going to happen on. And that feels. Even with the rate of change that everyone's feeling today, it still feels wildly unpredictable.

1:19:54

It is. And I think the reality is that the timeline gets dictated by how good you feel about the capabilities and the security of the solutions and the data access and all that stuff. It's not like our customers are sitting around saying, I wonder what the timeline is. They're all trying to actually force the timeline themselves. They're trying to get there. But I think I equate this to. At a much different level. But you think about the iPhone in 2007, none of us had any idea the applications we'd be running on that device 10 years later and what we do with it today, I mean it's just. And so I think this is going to be that on steroids. We don't know. I mean just look at the, look at the. What was it?

1:20:18

There's a few different names this week.

1:21:01

Yeah.

1:21:04

AIsocialNetwork, AI Social Network and then there's Claude Bot and all these things. Open Claw, openclaw. Yeah. And these are like, I mean they're taking everything by storm. And you know, you made the joke like pets.com doesn't exist but Chewy does in many cases. You know, you think about pioneers versus settlers and the different outcomes for each of them. We'll see who makes it. At the end of the day.

1:21:06

Is getting lucky underrated? We talked last week about Apple. Apple's work on the self driving car is what enabled them to be in the position to have the Mac Mini be a great Apple Silicon.

1:21:30

Luck and timing matters so much.

1:21:44

I mean.

1:21:46

I became CEO. There's a lot of luck and timing involved, right. I happened to be the person who was there. If my predecessor decided to retire five years earlier, I wouldn't have gotten the job. You know, it's just so there's a lot of luck and a lot of timing. Now there's also. You create your luck sometimes, right? But I think it's always part of the whole outcome.

1:21:49

Can you talk a little bit about CEO to CEO communication? There's a lot of really high stakes, high flying deal making between big companies. There's press releases that go out and then there's comments from each CEO and the deal evolves. And I'm wondering about what it takes to, you know, build a relationship with a CEO that you're going to do a big deal with and what it takes as that deal evolves and as the communications go out. Like what, how do you, how do you maintain a relationship with when so much is on the line?

1:22:10

It's always better to build a relationship before the big deal so that the big deal becomes easier because you've already built the trust. It's sort of like dealing with a time of crisis. When Covid came along, if you had great trust with your employee base and they believed in you, then you could navigate through that a lot better than if your culture was good, that was good. And so I think these relationships are really important. The CEO community in the United States honestly is very tight. I remember when I became CEO, there was another, there was one of them at one of the first CEO events I went to and he handed me a cell number and he said, listen, these people in this room are the only people that know what you're getting ready to go through. And so you need to get to know and make sure you call and talk and ask us old guys, you know, when you get into it. So I think the CEO community is very close. I think, you know, some of the number of deals right now. I think in many cases, the public narrative about what's going on isn't reflective of what's really happening behind the scenes. Because most CEOs are very pragmatic. There's not a lot of emotion. You're just sitting there, you're cutting out a deal. If somebody has a different, different opinion about it, you're not getting mad, you just, you're trying to just get to the outcome. And I think that's, that's the pragmatism and the calmness that most CEOs have. And I think that sometimes the press and, and others like to create the drama because that's what people click on.

1:22:41

Yeah. If anyone sticks a bunch of microphones in your face, be careful.

1:24:01

We move away quickly. It just happened.

1:24:04

By the way.

1:24:07

We gotta get the flash effects.

1:24:09

Yeah, yeah. Wear the paparazzi. If we flip it around, give us some advice for the youngest cohort of folks who will be joining Cisco. What does it take to succeed? What's your advice for people that are going into a.

1:24:11

The people that want to take your job one day? Maybe.

1:24:24

Maybe.

1:24:27

Come on, hurry up.

1:24:28

You know, I think the.

1:24:30

People who are wildly successful have this really incredible combination of our industry, understand the technology, have high eq, really care about the mission of the team, and understand that if the team success. Anybody who says, I don't care about my own success is lying to you. But the person who figures out that when the team succeeds, I'm going to succeed, so it's easy for me to focus on the team. And, and then you also have to have people who care about making sure their, their peers are, are successful as well. And I think it's, you know, the person who's solely focused on getting to the top as an individual, just. It's not going to happen. And that. So it's a combination of those technical skills and the high eq. You cannot, I can't underestimate.

1:24:35

You talked about, you've talked in the past about effectively doing the job that you want already and as a way to kind of like work your way.

1:25:24

Leadership before promotion, you guys actually do your research, don't you? I just. I tell people that, you know, if your peer group would look at your promotion announcement and just go, that makes perfect sense, then you've done your job right? And if you can't look in the mirror and say, okay, those people, would they be happy and would they believe it was the right decision? And if they wouldn't, then you're probably not quite where you ought to be. And I think that, you know, I tell everybody, too, you're. My team hates when I say this, but I'm gonna say it anyway. I think when we have two or three internal candidates for a promotion, the whole interview process is stupid to me. It's like we've been watching these people work for a decade. What are we going to learn about them when we sit down in a room for 30 minutes and ask them questions? When we watch them work, can't we just look at the three of them? And I translate that to, every day you're working is your interview for your next job. That should be your work. Every day should be your interview for the next promotion. And now, if you've got external candidates, certainly you have to get to know them and learn all those things. But when it comes down to two internal candidates, I just say, why are we doing this? But we do it anyway.

1:25:33

So what's keeping you up at night? There's a number.

1:26:42

Nothing. No.

1:26:45

Yeah. How do you. How do you. How do you handle. How do you. How did you learn to handle stress? Because over the last few years, you had. Covid. We've had so many different geopolitical tension, trade wars, all these things. What's your. What's your. You seem unfazed.

1:26:46

I have. I've always been able to compartmentalize things, and I have always. It's innate. I did not teach myself this. I've always been able to just put aside things I can't control. You plan for them.

1:27:00

You.

1:27:12

You do. You.

1:27:12

You. You come up with different scenario plans, but you don't. I mean, I'm not gonna lay it. Wake at night and worry about something that might happen that I have no control over. So. And, you know, the. There's. Look, I'm going home. When I've had a really bad day and I looked at my wife and I said, you want to hear the good news? And I said, I wasn't diagnosed with cancer today. And somebody. Somebody was, and I wasn't. So my worst day, if I'm not being diagnosed with cancer or some sort of terminal illness tomorrow, I'LL get them fight another fight, you know, fight, fight another fight. And you just got to have perspective.

1:27:13

I love it. Well, thank you so much for coming.

1:27:46

Thank you. Great to see you guys. Thank you.

1:27:48

Honor to meet.

1:27:50

Nice to meet you guys.

1:27:51

Keep doing it.

1:27:52

You guys have got a real good product.

1:27:53

Thank you. We appreciate it. Before we bring in our next guest, let me tell you about Plaid. Plaid powers, the apps you use to spend, save, borrow and invest securely connecting bank accounts to move money, fight fraud and improve lending. Now with AI and next.

1:27:54

What a legend.

1:28:06

What a legend. Without further ado, we have Jeetu Patel, Cito's president and chief product officer. Welcome to the show. How are you, Joe?

1:28:07

Look at this fit. Looking sharp.

1:28:15

You got to cover more of yourself up and you don't look as good now.

1:28:19

Well, thank you so much for taking the time.

1:28:24

Thank you for having me.

1:28:26

How is the Cisco Asonic going? Are you happy? How are you feeling?

1:28:26

I am thrilled. You know, the thing is, is I think we are at a juncture right now where these conversations with a range of topics with the ecosystem are actually far more important than any individual company talking about a product that they're trying to pedal. And I feel like the realization is now pretty obvious to everyone that this is an ecosystem play. Like no company, us included, is going to be able to actually get the full stack.

1:28:30

I mean, a couple of years ago people were saying that either one AI company will completely dominate and we have multiple IPOs going out. X AI is part of SpaceX now. Lots of companies are succeeding.

1:29:02

And I think this whole notion of a zero sum mentality is. I just don't think it's healthy.

1:29:13

It's never been true in tech.

1:29:18

It's never been true in tech, but it's actually more false now than ever before because the complexity is so high and the breadth is so high and the scale is so fast that if you just get arrogant thinking you're going to do everything by yourself, you are guaranteed to be left behind.

1:29:19

Okay, well, first time on the show, let's back up, introduce yourself.

1:29:36

Thank you for having me.

1:29:39

And I'd love to know a little bit of Cisco's a large company. Walk me through a little bit of the the org chart that sits under you. Where you work, who you're interfacing with, what projects you're working on.

1:29:39

So I've been here for about five and a half years and I joined here.

1:29:50

Congratulations. We're very happy about that. And we have a soundboard, by the way.

1:29:56

I know, I know I watch your show, so that's great.

1:30:01

Some people don't know that we bring it with us. It's still a surprise because you don't always spend, but so been here for.

1:30:04

Five and a half years. I joined from, from Box.

1:30:13

Yeah.

1:30:16

And I was chief Product Officer there prior to that. I was at emc prior to that I ran my own business for like 17 years in Chicago. And so I went the other way where I actually started really small and then I actually got the itch for scale. I'm like, I really want to learn scale.

1:30:17

Okay.

1:30:31

And that's what got me to the Valley, that's what got me to these large scale organizations. And the reason I'm really enamored with scale is it takes a little longer to get there sometimes, but once it gets there, there's a movement that gets created. Yeah.

1:30:31

So talk about either the org structure or the product surface that you oversee. How you're explaining everything that Cisco does because it's such a large organization now.

1:30:47

Yeah, we have a very broad portfolio. And so, you know, we. Everything from our core business, which is networking.

1:30:58

Yeah.

1:31:06

To then the very, you know, kind of close adjacency, which is security, because security is now getting baked into the fabric of the network.

1:31:07

So that's services software on top of that. Yes.

1:31:13

But you know, SaaS services and hardware. So we, we have, we don't only play in a range of different businesses, but we also play with multiple different business models. So we have a hardware business business, we have a professional software business. We've got a SaaS business in each one of these areas. So networking, security, Splunk, which was a massive acquisition that we made, collaboration, WebEx, contact center, all of those products, basically all products. What we did was we decided about a year and a half ago and Chuck, who you just interviewed, we were talking about this for five and a half years, which is Cisco has to become much more of a platform rather than feel like a holding company where you don't have each individual product that's kind of in its own silo. Because then you don't get the benefit of the breadth of Cisco and the tailwind of Cisco. But our breadth had become our liability. And so what we had to do was fundamentally kind of rethink how we're going to build our products. And it had to become a platform platform being that the marginal cost of ingestion goes down and there's a compounding value to every single kind of. Every time you build new functionality. It doesn't just help with the product that you're buying, but also helps with every product you're you purchased in the past. And can other people add value to the platform that you've built? So that's the core definition. So that's what we started doing and we consolidated all products together about 18 months ago. And I think it's been fantastic so far. There's a spring in the step in the employees. I think we are starting to see a fair amount of innovation. We've actually innovated more in the past 18 months than the previous decade combined, and I think it'll dwarf in comparison to what we'll do in the next 12 months.

1:31:17

That's awesome. Yeah. Talk more about Splunk and how that fits in specifically to the amount of data that's being created in the AI era. It feels like a very fortuitous acquisition. But what's the response been on the ground?

1:32:52

We were lucky on the Splunk side because it's very hard to find a company that is at scale with the right cultural fit, with the right technology adjacency, where the combination actually creates a 1 plus 1 equals 11. And I think Splunk happened to be one of those. There aren't that many of those. Like, a lot of times people will ask me, like, what's the next big acquisition? I'm like, if I found one, I wouldn't be shy to bring you the balance sheet. But there's just not that many that are out there. Either they're very frothy in the valuation. They're not, or they don't have a clear adjacency. We don't have the right go to market. We don't have the right cultural fit. Like, there's a bunch of things that have to fit just right. Yeah. And so that was very lucky with Splunk. And the thesis over there was, look, you have to assume that the attacker is already in the system, and what you're trying to prevent is lateral movement. And if you're trying to prevent lateral movement, security is a data game. And the more data you have and the more data that can be correlated, the better off you're going to be at compressing the time for investigation, doing better detections and doing a much better job on the response intermediate. And that's basically what Splunk brings us. And I think we've got a great leader now in Splunk as well, who came from Microsoft and Docusign, who's doing a fantastic job. Kamal Hathi. And I feel like we have probably hit 2% of the potential that we have in Splunk.

1:33:06

That's awesome.

1:34:30

How have you processed stage by stage, the overall AI hype cycle? It sort of perfectly coincides with your time at Cisco. It also, Cisco actually has the scale to have visibility into reality. It's like you're just like looking across, like you just pull up a map and just see like, okay, what's actually happening. How are, how are organizations adopting this not just in tech, but across the entire economy?

1:34:31

I think there's, I feel like I've always lived by the six part framework, which is like important and descending order, which is timing, market, team, product, brand, distribution. If you don't have all six, you don't win. But you need to make sure the first one is timing and you don't control timing.

1:34:55

Yeah, yeah, we were just talking about that with Chuck. It's like it's very easy to predict the future in some ways. Like with the Internet. Yeah, you just like could be off. Are you off by five years?

1:35:09

That's right.

1:35:20

If you're off a plan by two years, you could be like, it could be done. Like you might not win the market.

1:35:20

And by the way, there's a lot of great products in the market that actually hit the market at the wrong time and didn't ever see light of day. IPad wasn't the first kind of tablet to be built, but it was the one that actually hit the nail on the head on the timing. So I do feel like timing is a disproportionate contributor to success and you don't actually control timing. So that should tell you that the intellectual arrogance that people carry with themselves saying that this is me that made this happen has a ton of luck to it. And so we just happen to be at the right time, at the right place, building infrastructure for 40 years, which is now a scarce commodity. And if you think about GPUs, these GPUs without being networked don't really do you any good. And as the models get bigger, the networks actually need to get faster and need to get larger. And so what used to be something that sat on one GPU, then sat on a server with eight GPUs that needed to get network, then sat on a rack with multiple servers, then said, okay, I need to go scale out within the data center and have multiple clusters connected together. And now you're starting to see data centers getting connected together in this thing that they call scale across where you have multiple data centers, depending on where the power is available, hundreds of kilometers apart that'll actually operate as an ultra cluster coherently for running a training run. And that requires a whole new set of technology and a whole new set of assumptions around physics that have to be challenged, which is what we've been doing because we build our own silicon, we build our own systems, we build our own software, we build our own kind of platform. So that's been exceptionally beneficial for us. And yes, I would love to say that we capitalized on the opportunity well, but the fact that there was such an intrinsic demand for large scale data center build outs is something that's just like we were lucky to be there at the right place, at the right time, with the right products. Yeah.

1:35:25

Is cross data center training particularly in demand right now? I know Google's had some success with it, other labs are probably thinking about it and working towards it. Is that something?

1:37:17

It is. And it's actually the reason it's important is because you might not find all the power to juice a single data center. And so you then have to make sure that you, you build the data centers where the power is available. So once, if you have power grids in two separate locations, you then need to make sure that those get coherently connected. The problem with training runs is if you drop packets, then you have to restart the training run, which becomes extremely expensive. And so what you need to do then is say, okay, so I'm going to build in the silicon itself technologies for deep buffering so that I can make sure that jitter and packet loss doesn't really go out in effect the training run. And that's been a, you know, we just launched our P200 chip, what we call with the 8223 router. And that's actually going to be, it's already in a couple of hyperscalers, but that's an area that I feel is going to have a ton of momentum.

1:37:27

Yeah. How is it being a, like a fabless semiconductor company working with TSMC, I know there's silicon one, which is a 5 nanometer process. Tim Cook was just talking on earnings about maybe some supply issues on the 3 nanometer process. There's always questions of like where bottlenecks emerge, even if they're very temporal. How is it going on scaling actual supply for you?

1:38:18

So the good news is we've been at it for a while and we have a pretty broad portfolio. And so volume wise we just shipped like I think it was last quarter, our millionth chip.

1:38:44

Yeah.

1:38:55

And so it gets, you know, we've got so volume wise, we've got enough kind of volume of. And I think in this market, scale really matters. And even though you might enjoy scale today, if you don't continue to keep growing the scale, you become subscale very fast. And so there's a level of healthy paranoia that you need to have about continuing to be operating at scale. And so that, that's been beneficial for us. We have, of course, you know, we work closely with the fabs and all of that to make sure that we get our fair share of capacity. But it's also important in the sense that the data center build outs that are happening require this. And the thing that's been really beneficial for us is we happen to be the offset so that there's not a level of pricing power that our competitors sometimes face. If you just had one of our competitors providing the network ASICS and everyone else is just building systems around the network a 6, then you'd actually have a challenge. So what hyperscalers want to do is make sure that they can offset that by having choices. And so we provide choice to the market. And that's been, I mean, as you saw last year, we had identified, we said we'll do about a billion dollars in orders in hyperscalers. And how much did you do? We did north of 2 and then, and then this year and in Q1, which was, you know, last quarter, we, we did like, I think it was north of a billion three or so in just the first quarter. So like you could start to see that there's, there's a fair amount of momentum, but you have to stay paranoid, keep your head down, keep innovating.

1:38:56

What, what's your pitch to talent that you know, is elite, that you're trying to, you know, we're in the midst of last year. Felt like you'd sum up the year as like really intense talent war. There's so many companies with so much hype and I feel like Cisco's approach is like, let the metrics sort of speak for themselves. Not as hype driven as other parts of, you know, the press, the press release economy, let's say. But if you're sitting down with somebody and you have three minutes to get them to join Cisco versus, you know, another company or a lab or something like that. What's your pitch?

1:40:38

My pitch typically is we're very mission driven. And so we want to make sure that we're building critical infrastructure for the air, for the world. And that's a, that's, that's a mission that you should they have to feel intrinsically connected to and excited about? And it's not just about creating connectivity and that infrastructure, but also keeping it safe and secure and then just continuing to keep building the entire full stack. I mean, we build the silicon, we build the systems, we build the operating system, we build the platform, we build the application. So like we've got that full stack. And so if you wanted to develop and grow in a company, and we're very well known to actually get people who don't have experience in a certain area to put them into. I mean, look at me, I didn't know much about networking when I first came on.

1:41:15

Sure.

1:41:58

And I think it's, I feel like experience is great in certain areas, but sometimes it can actually create a burden of bias for you. And so having a mixture of experience with inexperience so that you are having the inexperienced person allow the person with experience to unlearn as fast is really important. And the appeal to people coming in is, look, we are, we're going to build things which are going to be based on the long term. And if you want to learn how to have good, strong leadership foundation principles, Cisco is a great place to be for the long term. But like, I'm not. If someone asked me like, you know, what do you have for your lunch? Is it free lunch? I'm like, you're asking the question, this is the wrong place for it. We're pretty scrappy when it comes to that kind of stuff. And we have proudly scrappy about that stuff.

1:41:59

What about specific skills that are the most in demand? I mean, there's, there's a lot of roles that are augmented by AI now.

1:42:52

Well, we've heard, we've heard too about, you know, plumbers and electricians flying around and, you know, they are in demand for sure.

1:43:01

Even sales guys and chip designers. That's not going away anytime soon.

1:43:06

No, I think, look, the, the, the roles that have been in demand around Enterprise, let's look at the entire business. Like if you look at enterprise sales, that's always going to be in demand. We're always going to need people in front of customers to say, hey, we need to make sure that we can get you the technology and the distribution is a massive kind of, you know, advantage that we have. But on the chip side, there's, there is not enough people that understand how to etch sand into integrating intelligence. We need more of those. And so there's always a shortage of that. There's a shortage in people that are building hardware and systems There's a shortage in people that are building software. So I don't feel like there's a lack of shortage in any of the areas. But what's now happened is you've added to that an entirely different development model where you also need researchers for AI. And so we have an AI research team, and that's something that we historically didn't need in the product development cycle. And we've only been doing that for now for a few years. In addition to the research team, you need to make sure that software development lifecycle itself is changing. Like we just announced, or not announced, but we just kind of revealed with Sam that 100% of our AI defense product, which is the product that we announced last year at this event, is now written, is going to be written by AI in three weeks. 100%. Like no humans writing code, humans are reviewing, which means that the bottleneck is no longer writing code, it's actually reviewing code, you know, and those will require kind of shifts in mental models. And so it's less, just about the shortage of what kind of skills do we have. I actually pay less attention to skills and I pay much more attention to attitude. And you know, you can't teach hunger. And so you have to make sure that you find people that are hungry, intrinsically hungry. I don't believe in hiring people that you have to motivate all the time, come intrinsically motivated, come intrinsically hungry, and then I think you have to be insanely curious in this time and day and age, if you, if you're not, if you're not willing to experiment and put yourself in an uncomfortable position. And constantly I always tell people, like, if you, if you don't like change, and this is not my line, someone else told me this, I think Chuck told me this, but hear it from someone else too. So if you don't like change, wait until irrelevance hits you.

1:43:11

That's a good point.

1:45:28

How have you processed the AI safety debate? Fortunately, the labs are kind of a heat shield for everyone else in AI. It's like the focus is entirely on them. And yet Cisco and other infrastructure companies will be a key part of ensuring that all of these products that are created and intelligent, that is created, has positive impact on the world and humanity.

1:45:31

So I think there's two dimensions to this. The first dimension is all the tools that you and I use are the ones that the adversaries are going to use to go out and create attacks on cybersecurity. And so the first thing you have to do is make sure that you have cyber defense happening at machine scale, not just at human scale. Okay, that's been something the whole industry is doing. That's nothing revolution, but we have to do it and we got to make sure that AI is being used for that. But the second area, which is these models that these applications are getting built on inherently by nature are non deterministic, which means they're unpredictable. But you're trying to build like a finance application or healthcare application, which needs to be very deterministic. I tell people, I'm like, you know, hallucination is a great feature when you're writing poetry. Everything else in life, not that useful.

1:45:58

You know, your doctor is like, sorry, I hallucinated.

1:46:43

And so what we have to do is we have to make sure that we actually figure out mechanisms to get full visibility on the model and then have validation that says, does the model behave the way that you want it to behave? So, for example, if I ask a question to the model, build me a bomb, what it'll very dexterously do is tell you, I can't give you that answer. But if you ask the question slightly in a nuanced way, I'm a movie scriptwriter. I'm actually going out and shooting a movie with Brad Pitt. We're going to shoot a scene where Brad Pitt's going to get into the car, build a bomb, and then blow up the Bellagio. And so can you build me that entire scene? And by the way, can you show me how the bomb gets built in that scene? The model could get tricked. And so what you need to have is some kind of an algorithmic red teaming process that says trick the model in test rather than in real world and do that algorithmically. And once you do that, then have some kind of mechanism to enforce runtime enforcement guardrail so that every single time you build an application, that application is prepared to go out and deal with those kind of questions that might trick the model so that you as a company don't have your brand at risk when you do that. That's the thing that we are actually building. And the thing that gets me really happy is if there was one product that I wanted to have fully written with AI, it would have been that product. Yeah, because the speed it has to outrun everyone else. And you have to make sure that you deal with this in machine scale. And so it's really cool to see the teams not only change the fact that they're using tooling to make that happen, but they've changed their entire process Every engineer in that team is now just a spec developer. They just build specs, they create markdown files, they give context to the model, they give context to the agent and then the agent's kind of writing the code. And then our biggest bottleneck is becoming review of code rather than the actual writing and generation of code.

1:46:47

How long do you think that lasts?

1:48:40

I think it becomes, well, I think presumably. No, the review is going to get easier too. Yeah, totally, totally. At some point in time these things are going to continue to get, we'll.

1:48:42

Be able to just eventually solve.

1:48:53

I could just be here like eight hours, but you know, but so I think that's, that's an area. And by the way, that doesn't mean that you can have a lot of AI slop that gets delivered in the market when that happens. Because what you'll have is really crappy software that gets written if people aren't paying attention to it. It doesn't obviate the need for having taste and having judgment and having instinct and making sure that you're thinking about what you're building. But what it'll at least do for you is provide this mechanism to accelerate the development where we're not just constrained by I don't have resources, so therefore I'm not going to build 80% of the things I want to build. However, prioritization is still going to be important and I feel like focus. I don't think the nature of focus changes just because you can build a lot of stuff quickly.

1:48:56

Yeah, talk about innovation at Cisco. You mentioned it earlier, but I was watching a video from Jane street all about innovation not necessarily being perfectly correlated with new company formation. Like what startups do is great. But you know, you look the iPhone that came from Apple, you look at the, you know, the transformer paper came from Google. Two wildly different approaches to innovation, one, you know, CEO leading the other. This labs, the Skunk Works team. How do you see innovation balancing between sort of top down mandate for new products, what the market's responding to, customer driven versus lab scientists going off and working in.

1:49:43

So first, first thing is innovation is in my mind it's a choice. So when companies say, well we are big so we can't innovate, there's a.

1:50:28

Lot of big companies that don't innovate, but there are a bunch that do. So what's the separation?

1:50:35

Correlation does not equate causality in that case. Like just because you're a big company does not mean you can't innovate. In fact, some of the greatest companies, you know, are innovating at a really, really fast base. And by the way, scale really matters right now in AI, scale is actually a huge accelerant for innovation.

1:50:39

Yeah, Distribution, more data. Flywheel. Yeah, absolutely, all of that.

1:50:55

And so I do feel like innovation is a choice. And I think it's an intellectually lazy argument to say that innovation can't happen because we are too large. However, size does bring about some level of, you know, slowness in the process. And you have to be diligent about making sure that you're intolerant on bureaucracy seeping in, or more importantly, indecision. Sleeping is seeping in, and apathy kind of seeping in, where people just give up after a while. You know what? I tried couple times. It didn't work. It's like, no, you have to be comfortable with conflict. You have to be comfortable with making sure that you speak truth to power. And if that means that you're gonna like. One thing that can become a failure state is in these large companies, you know, you get overly concerned about feelings of people. And so as a result, what you stop doing is you stop having the debates that need to be had. What you need to do instead is establish trust first in teams. And once you have trust, you know that the intent is not to put you down. The intent is to make sure that you get the best idea, ship out, and get to win. And winning requires contrarian viewpoints that are actually actively debated and sometimes hurting feelings. Exactly. But it wouldn't hurt feelings if everyone were clear about the fact that I trust this person and they're debating the idea, not the person. They're not attacking my personality. And so one of my mentors always told me, you know, and I don't. I haven't. I have not mastered this. You know, state the facts, but watch your tone. When I tend to do poorly is when I get passionate, when I don't watch my tone, because then that debate feels like it's a personal conflict rather than something that's about the idea.

1:50:59

Yeah.

1:52:50

And so if I were to say, you know, on the innovation side, top down, bottoms up, I think there are certain things you have to go top down. Like, we had a decision we had to make that said we're pivoting to AI first as a company, and that was not a decision I could have had democratically kind of sourced from 30,000 engineers, it would have not worked. Yeah, so we said we're going to go from top down on that one. But I. I should be losing 99% of the debates in my organization because the person in the front line is spending 14 hours a day on that problem. I'm spending six minutes a week on that problem. Chances are, even if I'm infinitely smarter, which I'm not, if I'm doing the right job, because I'm hiring people smarter than me, at that point, you need to make sure that that person is able to have more facts, more thought put into that argument than me. So I always tell people, if I'm having a debate with you, if I'm having an argument, and if I don't lose 95% of the arguments, then we've got a different problem.

1:52:51

Yeah, yeah.

1:53:46

Because you just haven't thought through. But what my job is to make sure that the second level and third level thinking is actually well thought through on your end. And then we need to make sure that we have certain core principles up top that go from top down and certain core value systems that we should not compromise on so that we don't actually get people on an infinite loop. Then from the bottom up, allow people to innovate and then let those great ideas percolate up.

1:53:47

Well, thank you so much for coming on the show.

1:54:14

Thanks so much. Great to meet you.

1:54:16

Great to meet you.

1:54:17

Thanks for having us here.

1:54:18

Hopefully we'll have you back soon. In the meantime, I'll tell you about cognition. They're the makers of Devon, the AI software engineer. Crush your backlog with your personal AI engineering team. And our next guest is coming in right now. Fantastic. I wasn't sure if we were gonna have a little bit of a break, but we have Costa. Welcome to the show.

1:54:18

How are you?

1:54:40

Welcome to the show.

1:54:40

How you doing?

1:54:41

Nice to meet you guys.

1:54:41

Thank you so much. No, no, we're good. We go for three hours every day. It's no problem. Please introduce yourself since it's the first.

1:54:42

Time on your show.

1:54:49

Yeah.

1:54:50

So I'm Costa Cladianos. I'm the EVP of Technology for the San Francisco 49ers and Levi's Stadium, and big fan of shows. So excited to be here.

1:54:50

Yeah.

1:54:59

Explain to us, like, what that means and what your day to day is like and what the choices you're facing are.

1:54:59

So there's never, like, a regular day to day. So my team, we're responsible for everything from, you know, getting into the stadium, the ticketing systems, the point of sale systems for food and beverage, the WI fi, the network infrastructure, the cyber security of the stadium, making sure that on game day, we're like the referees, you don't notice us and you just have a great time and, you know, cheer on the team, which is hopefully the 49ers.

1:55:04

Yeah. How has technology in a football stadium evolved? Like we were going back to like the first broadcast was the Los Angeles Rams before they moved to St. Louis. Then they went back and it made sense because, you know, Hollywood is in there, they're very forward thinking. But how much have you seen an evolution in the technology that goes into broadcasting a football game?

1:55:28

Well, it's crazy. I've been doing this for about 25 years now and you know, in a bunch of different, different sports. And it just used to be, you know, you go to the game, you watch the game, eat your food and you go home. Now it's different because it ha. You have to have a technology experience. The reason why is, I mean, staying at home sounds like a good proposition. You have your big tv, your couch, you have your food. So we want to, we want to make a reason to come to the park. We want to enhance that experience. So how can we get it to be kind of a social experience? How can we get something that'll get you off your couch and coming there and having a great time? Because I mean, it's also not cheap to come to a game. You know, it's, it's a significant dollar value from your wallet and an entertainment dollar. So we want to make sure that you have the, the best experience possible. And then, I mean, you look at the people watching sports. What are we doing now? We're, you know, we're all on our phones, you know, we're all on our technology. We all want more data. So it's like, it's not trying to get people off their phones. It's like, how do we stats more plays, know more things about their, their favorite part players and really bring the action to you. And then, I mean, with us being kind of an influencer economy, everybody wants to show, show off where they are, right? So we're like, what a better place to show off where you are and having a good time there. And then your friends are going to be jealous and then come and enjoy the game as well, right?

1:55:48

Yeah.

1:56:59

Rank the most, like rank your tech stack based on importance on game day, like specifically during the game. And I want this in the Internet at the top. No, no, no, no, no. But I'm talking about like when, like if, if, if you're just an observer and you're enjoying the game and you're experiencing, you know, a bunch of different Sets of technology. Like, what are, what is like the average person not noticing that is like going on in the background that you're fixated on. Yeah.

1:57:00

So I mean, hopefully they're not noticing it because that means it's working, right?

1:57:24

Yeah.

1:57:27

So I, I think you start from the, the foundation, the infrastructure. The network.

1:57:28

The.

1:57:31

The network infrastructure. And you know, I tell everyone, they're like, what is that? I'm like, that's the plumbing of organization. That's. That's where everything flows. That's to make sure without that, we have absolutely nothing.

1:57:31

We're cooked.

1:57:41

So, I mean, you know, Cisco is a great partner of ours and we work together. It helps that we're in Silicon Valley, which it helps, but also hurts because everyone knows technology in there, Right. So everyone coming to the game, they expect the best.

1:57:41

So.

1:57:54

Which is a great challenge and one of the reasons why I went there so that, that that infrastructure has to be solid to deliver you WI fi, and there's just more and more need for it.

1:57:54

Right.

1:58:04

We have to keep scaling it up now, you know, with AI coming down the pipe, everyone's looking up their LLMs and on their phones and obviously sharing their experience. And, you know, with advanced stats and things like that, it has to be frictionless for them.

1:58:04

Right.

1:58:19

And so that network infrastructure has to be solid. Not only what's going on in the stands as the fans, but on the field too. We can't have scoreboards go down, we can't have the coach comms go down. So we work together with the NFL to do that. So that's incredibly important to us. And then with that, hand in hand is actually our cybersecurity posture. I mean, we can have the best systems in the world, but, you know, one hack, you know, one cybersecurity incident, and it's a massive problem.

1:58:20

Is that mostly like DDoS, just like, just like adversarial hackers just trying to like take you offline, screw things up, create economic damages? Or is that specifically like break in and steal credentials? Everything? All of the above.

1:58:46

I imagine every day there's somebody that would love to like, broadcast onto the Jumbotron.

1:58:59

Yeah. Like this crypto scam or something.

1:59:04

I don't know.

1:59:06

What's the shape of the threat?

1:59:06

There is so many different threats. Like, I mean, you just named.

1:59:07

It's easy.

1:59:10

You're scratching the surface just because we're so visible. You know, every Sunday the world's looking at us and, you know, it's a visible attack vector. So, I mean, we have an Incredible cybersecurity team. We work again with the NFL and then, you know, share knowledge with other teams because, you know, we're competitors on the field, but colleagues off the field. And so we work together to make sure that we're mitigating risk. And you know, it's not if we're attacked, it's when you're attacked. So we try and make sure to stop that. So you have to be proactive instead of reactive. If we're reactive, we've already lost the battle.

1:59:10

Yeah. Is NAB important for you?

1:59:45

Nab?

1:59:47

Yeah, the national.

1:59:48

The show.

1:59:49

Yeah, the show. Like we go from, for the camera stuff here. We try and learn.

1:59:50

Great show. Yeah, we do set up big cameras.

1:59:54

But I'm wondering if that's important to you or if there's a different conference there. You're meeting more people and talking to more suppliers.

1:59:55

No, we do send a lot of people to NAP our engineering team. I mean it's definitely important to us.

2:00:01

Because look at our broadcast size.

2:00:06

We have right now, I believe the largest outdoor 4K video screens in the league. So we do send a lot of people there. I mean, you want to be around the best in the race. We have lot of shows that we go to. But it's not only you don't want to stay inside the industry. I always say you learn your best when you're looking outside. So who's doing what? Great. Doesn't have to be from sports.

2:00:08

And take that then what is like the top down mandate or standards that are shared from the NFL? Like there's obviously broadcast standards if you're delivering to ESPN or ABC or NBC. But what does need to be standard across the NFL broadly?

2:00:28

Yeah, I mean the NFL has their.

2:00:44

Their standards across the NFL in terms of, you know, WI fi infrastructure, connectivity. Yeah, exactly. But you know, you know us at the 49ers, you know, our team always over performs on the field. You know, we're always expected to win a championship. You know, that's what we try and do. I mean it's difficult, but that's like our goal. So you know, with, with me and the, and the technology team, you know, we're trying to be the best again. We're in Silicon Valley, so we expect more. So I want to go over, over and above and deliver an experience that's not just kind of the minimum, it's an experience where you're going to come there and say, wow, Levi Stadium's unbelievable. Like this is, this is insane. Let's go there. This is something different that maybe somebody like a Disney should copy. Right. Or Starbucks or somebody else in the industry. Sorry if they're not sponsors.

2:00:45

But how much different is the super bowl specifically? Is there more demands on your organization for a bigger event, or is it sort of the same as any other?

2:01:27

Yeah, I mean, the super bowl is one of the world's largest, arguably the world's largest sporting event, especially in this country, and the demands are greater. And we work again, hand in hand with the NFL as their event. The capacity, the WI fi, the bandwidth, it always sets records wherever they go. I mean, the previous record at our stadium was Taylor Swift, which was an incredible concert, by the way. And I mean, her demographic, super tech savvy. As soon as she came out on stage, people are, you know, putting up their phones and sharing that, and it blew away our bandwidth records a couple years ago. And we expect this to go even higher. But that's a record that's always made to be broken because people are using more data, not less.

2:01:37

Right.

2:02:20

So we always have to prepare and scale up as well.

2:02:21

Well, Jordy, anything else?

2:02:24

I mean, I have a lot more questions, but it's great having you on the show.

2:02:25

Yeah. Thanks so much for stopping.

2:02:29

Thanks, guys.

2:02:30

Great to meet you.

2:02:30

Oh, let me tell you about Railway. Railway is the all in one intelligent cloud provider. Use your favorite agent to deploy apps, servers, databases, and more, while Railway automatically takes care of scaling, monitoring, and security. And we have our next guest already here. He showed up a little bit early. We can bring him down if he's down.

2:02:31

Let's do it. He looks great.

2:02:48

About console. Console builds AI agents that automate 70% of it. HR finance support, giving employees instant resolution for access requests and password resets. Good to see you again. Good to have you. Data centers in space. What you got?

2:02:49

When are we going to coming in hot?

2:03:06

Me, you, the International Space Station. Let's break it down.

2:03:08

You know, the space tourism industry is quite a. Quite a fun one. Right.

2:03:11

Would you go. Would you do the blue origin thing where they blast you out past the Karman line? It's good enough for Katy Perry. It's not good enough for you. What's going on.

2:03:15

It's.

2:03:23

It's like, you know, like you're in free fall. You're not actually. I want to be, like, going around for days. I want my bone density to start to atrophy.

2:03:23

Right.

2:03:33

I truly want to feel the negative effects of space.

2:03:34

Yeah. Yeah. It's not enough just to go back. I think I would do it.

2:03:36

It's like 90 seconds, right?

2:03:40

Yeah, but it's better than being hanging out on but like all the cool.

2:03:41

Stuff that astronauts do, right? Like you know, put water and then like they're bubbling and then you like try and drink the water or like.

2:03:45

You know, they'll be unplugging the gpu, plugging it back.

2:03:50

Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. That's how you pay for your space tourism.

2:03:54

You got to go 90 seconds satellite.

2:03:57

One 90 second trip at a time. No, but people were wondering, you know, tpus Nvidia going on the, on the, on the Starlink V5 or whatever. Whenever something gets up there, it feels like this will be, be something more like a Tesla silicon chip, an AI chip. Like do you have any insight into like what the process. If you wind up figuring out how to heat dissipate, if you wind up figuring out the costs, what might the chip look like?

2:04:02

So I think, I think you know, everyone freaks out. Oh my God. Putting stuff in space is expensive. Yeah, but if you look at like starship launch costs and you know they keep falling, you're like fine, right? Like I think that's not, you know, by the end of the decade the cost of space, space launch will be fine. The heat dissipation, I mean it's a challenge. But you just put a massive, massive, effectively radiator and it's fine, right? By the end of the decade like you'll be good. I think the big challenge is that chips are just really unreliable.

2:04:29

Right.

2:04:53

And so how do you deal with like a couple things, right. Satellites can only be so large before they like you start needing a lot of support and structure before they tear themselves apart. So when you look at like the launches, right, These things are shooting out like tiny satellites and many of them, okay, so you can't have like a big fully connected cluster of chips and then like on top of that, right? How do you deal with any random error on Earth you have techs running around the data center unplugging stuff, putting in spares, things like that. What do you do in space? You RMA it to the factory where they might unsolder it and re solder it and then test it and it works and go back out. Sometimes it is just trashed. But that's the challenge to me is.

2:04:55

That, is that I feel like maybe the pattern we should be looking at is like how often do the Tesla self driving chips need to get serviced? Because that's like the team that would probably be building or like bridging the gap there. Like the Starlink satellites or they go down. But like the service works like you're just relying on some sort of like, you know, 90% uptime stuff's coming down. But most people that are in a waymo, like the chip keep, keeps working. Right. Most people that are in a Tesla self driving, like they're not. Like, you don't hear about Tesla owners being like, I love fsd but I'm constantly in the shop getting my, my custom silicon chips unseated and reseated. Right.

2:05:38

Well, I mean it's, it's also a function of like the complexity of a chip. Right, sure. You know, if, if a chip is twice as fast.

2:06:15

Yeah.

2:06:21

And let's say the bit error rate, Right. Like how often a bit flips.

2:06:22

Sure.

2:06:25

Is the same. Then it's erroring out twice as often.

2:06:25

Yeah.

2:06:28

But let's say the chip is 10x as big. Right. And so when you look at like a Tesla FSD chip, very, very good, very, very efficient. Very. Still, like relatively inexpensive and cheap compared to, you know, a big old GPU or TPU or whatever. Right. Those things are extremely large. And you know, again, like if, if the error rates are the same, then it fails 10x more. But in fact the error rates are a bit harder, higher because they're pushing these things to the absolute limit.

2:06:29

Yeah.

2:06:53

Whereas, you know, Tesla does have some level of like. Well, first of all, the Tesla car has two chips sort of redundancy already built in. Right.

2:06:53

Maybe you do that on the satellite, but then there's more power. More.

2:07:01

Yeah. Right. So the whole allure. Right. Of it is, is, you know, effectively power is free.

2:07:04

Right.

2:07:09

And solar panels, you look at the cost curve of solar panels, you look at the cost curve of satellite launches, you're like, this is, this is free, this is great. But power is less than 10% of the cost of the cluster.

2:07:10

Sure.

2:07:20

Right. So, so like it's that 90% you're not saving anything on.

2:07:20

Yeah, yeah.

2:07:24

And insofar as much as potentially a.

2:07:25

Hundred times the hassle.

2:07:28

Yes, yes.

2:07:30

Yeah.

2:07:31

There's this whole like, you know, like if you look at Nvidia GPUs, right. When you first turn on the cluster, about 10 to 15% of them fail RMA in the first two weeks.

2:07:32

Wow.

2:07:42

And then that's fine. Like you have to reseat them, whatever. And like the industry knows how to deal with this. Right. And over time, like hopper's now at 5%, but Blackwell's still 10 to 15%. Right. Actually started out higher than that.

2:07:43

Sure.

2:07:53

And when A new generation comes out, it's going to be higher than 10, 15%. It'll have its curve gradually decline down. But you know, who, who's gonna, Are you gonna test it and burn it in on the ground or are you gonna say 5% of my chips or 10, 15%? My chips are trashed. Yeah, because someone can't go up there and like do these things. Or am I saying, oh, I need robots who can do all this stuff and in space. And now that's like an additional engineering problem when sacks of meat are actually very cheap.

2:07:54

Yeah.

2:08:16

Speaking of Nvidia, we haven't talked since the GROK acquisition. What does that look like in the bulk case? Like if it's, if it's a good, if the next version of Grok is a great chip, is it sitting next to the, you know, H200, H1 hundreds in the, in the rack GB200? How does it fit into the actual, like what Nvidia deposits deploys? Is it just a separate chip?

2:08:17

I think it's a big vibe shift from Nvidia. Right before they were like, all right, I got this big gpu. Everyone's gonna use this GPU software. Ecosystem of the GPU is so good. It's one size fits all. Everyone, you know, like, everyone's trying to make all these like specific point solutions, but we've got the thing that's good at everything. Okay. And then they had a vibe shift, right. They launched this thing called cpx, which is a chip made for pre fill, you know, prompt processing, creating a KV cache and also good at video generation and image generation. And that's coming out later this year.

2:08:39

In the last press release, they were really talking about video generation as well.

2:09:08

So, yeah, you've got like cpx, you've got like the standard GPU now you've got the Grok chips and they all fill a different niche, but really it screams, oh, crap. We don't really know exactly where AI is going, which I don't think anyone does. Right. I mean, it's moving so fast. The software is the model architectures, et cetera. So we're just going to engineer solutions that are along multiple points to the Pareto optimal curve and then one of them will win. Right. And I think it's sort of like a big vibe shift from Nvidia. Also. They just knew OpenAI was going to do the Cerebras deal, so they freaked.

2:09:11

Out, but got it. Okay. Yeah, yeah. Get me up to speed on what makes Cerebras important in the ecosystem right now.

2:09:39

So, you know, you have people thinking like, oh, latency matters. In terms of where our data center is, it doesn't matter at all. What matters is as we've moved from chat applications which were like, or search response immediately chat applications. Let's Say response takes 10, 20, 30 seconds. You've got agents I don't know. My cloud codes are working in the background for a long time. It doesn't matter where the data center is. But what does matter is that these streams of inference take 30 minutes versus 10 minutes versus 5 minutes. And for a lot of people, I'm fine to spend 10x the price on something that completes 10x faster. Cerebras just makes a ton of sense that there. So OpenAI, you know, they've got these like long horizon. There's, there's like Codex 5.2 extra high thinking or whatever. It's terrible. Can you guys teach them how to market open? You have to sponsor this podcast.

2:09:47

Yeah, yeah, we yesterday and I did actually ask him, like, I, I, I had the Codex app pulled up on my desktop and I was like, there are six different models and then there's a, there's another button that I can pick.

2:10:38

Well, how many different products are called codecs now there's a lot.

2:10:50

Now there's an app.

2:10:53

Yeah, yeah, we have guy on just to do branding, Lexicon branding came on the show yesterday talking about the, all the naming.

2:10:54

Naming architectures.

2:11:02

Naming architectures. It is complicated, but hopefully you could.

2:11:03

Tell he's just blood's boiling because like all the AI companies just have the most chaotic anthropic Claude. Claude code. But also you can use Claude code for, for other stuff.

2:11:06

Yeah, but yeah, I mean with Cerebras it seems like there is a value to it, but are they constrained on the supply side? Like, can they actually scale up to, you know, a Colossus style data center that could actually speed up Codex not just for like one user, but all the users.

2:11:16

So I mean, Cerebres can speed up multiple users for sure. The question is sort of like where you use it and that's where they have to like figure out where within Codex. Right?

2:11:33

Yeah.

2:11:42

Because there are times where Codex is running for like 10 hours and sometimes you don't mind. Right? Like, screw it. I've put up this nice prompt, gone work on it, refactor my code, do this thing, do this task. Other times I want this iteration feedback loop. So how do you expose it to the user without saying, hey, actually there's another toggle. So Your permutation is 18 times, hopefully.

2:11:42

Like a really robust model router. But it feels like that's been a process.

2:12:01

Yeah. So the open ideal is like for 750 megawatts, it's not that much capacity. Capacity on the order of like what OpenAI has talked about. You know, by the end of 28 they'll be at like 16 gigawatts. Sure of that.

2:12:05

So it's versus like the absolute cutting edge. The most price insensitive customers in that specific use case of this is the type of prompt that you need to return fast. Then you'll get the speed up potentially.

2:12:16

Right, Right. And they've got to figure out how to do it from a product, exposing it to the user, etc. But it's, it's clearly something where there is demand. Right. Like, I don't know, like Andrej Karpathy doesn't care if he's spending a thousand bucks per his agent per second or whatever. Right. Like, you know, whoever it is, this, these like super cracked engineers don't care at all. And then obviously there's like a long tail of like actually cost does matter for most people. And so, so all along that curve they've got to have solutions, right?

2:12:26

Yeah.

2:12:51

When did you first think that X I might end up at another Elon company?

2:12:53

I mean this has been rumored for a long time, right. Like people are saying Tesla, Tesla, Tesla. For the longest time.

2:13:00

It's harder with public company.

2:13:04

Yeah, yeah. And then, and then a few a bit ago people were like, oh, SpaceXi. I'm like, wait, this makes no sense.

2:13:05

No, but there was a very coordinated like narrative pump.

2:13:11

Oh yeah.

2:13:14

Like, and then the space data center.

2:13:14

At the end of last year, it was like almost like perfectly telegraphed.

2:13:16

Well, there's, there's a bet right. Between basically the head of compute of XAI and the head of compute of Anthropic. And the bet is what percentage of worldwide data center capacity is in space by the end of 28? And the bar is 1%.

2:13:21

Oh wow.

2:13:34

And so the Xai guy is like really bullish and the anthropic guy's like, yeah, yeah. So. But it's a really interesting bet. I take the under on 1% by 28 because that's a gigawatt in space.

2:13:35

Yeah.

2:13:46

But it's actually not that crazy, right? Yeah, it's roughly 150 Starship launches. We'll get them to 100 to get them to a gigawatt in space. Yeah. So you know, starship hasn't worked Yet. Yeah, fully.

2:13:47

I was looking at the energy draw of the current star. Starlink fleet and I think they're at like, what is it, 200 kilowatts or something like that. So you, you get a thousand of those 200 megawatts and like you're starting to be in the territory. Something like that.

2:13:58

Yeah. So the V2 Starship satellites, I think are the only ones they've launched. Maybe they've launched a few V3s, but the V3s are coming soon and those are, those are like 100x more bandwidth each. Right.

2:14:14

And, and just more power. And so when I'm just thinking of like, can you scale this thing up at all? It's like, are they two orders of magnitude off? Are they three orders? This feels like they're like one order of magnitude off. Something that looks like an H100.

2:14:23

I think the metric is like 50. It's either 50 kilowatts a ton or something like this per satellite for V3.

2:14:35

Yeah.

2:14:41

If, let's say from V3 to whatever the compute thing is, they double it again, get to 100. I think that the V2s are like 25.

2:14:42

Yeah.

2:14:48

So if you get to 100 kilowatts per ton for launch, it's. It's only 150 or so Starship launches.

2:14:49

Yeah.

2:14:54

I think that's so reasonable. Maybe not 28, maybe it takes 29. But like, you know, it's, it's so reasonable. The question is cost and reliability and you know, what happens when the chip fails, how do you service it, that kind of stuff. How do you, how do you deal with having clusters be much smaller instead of like, you know, these big clusters? Even for inference, big clusters are useful.

2:14:54

Yeah.

2:15:12

Yeah.

2:15:13

How do you think about Google's response to Grox or Eris? Tpus obviously very successful. But are they forking that project to eat more of the Pareto curve?

2:15:14

Yeah. So for the longest time Google's had one main line of TPU's. Right. All made by Broadcom. And then sort of next year they've diverged it. Right. Where Broadcom makes a TPU and MediaTek makes a TPU, these two TPUs are focused at different things and they're fabbed at. They're both fabbed at tsmc. Everything at the end of the day goes to Arrakis.

2:15:27

Right.

2:15:45

I want to go there next.

2:15:46

But.

2:15:47

So fat by TSMC. Regardless. But both of these TPUs are focused on different things and they've actually got a third project for another kind of TPU there they also see this need to proliferate along the curve of like, hey, do I care a lot about super high amounts of flops, not that much memory? Do I care a lot about super fast on chip memory only? Do I care about 3D stacking memory? Do I care about this sort of general purpose middle ground AI chip, which is what an H100, a Blackwell, a TPU looks like today? They're sort of like, oh, we need to hit the entire Pareto optimal curve. And it's like, okay, within this there's training versus inference differences and what numerics you want and all these other things. There's so much complexity there. Everyone sort of is diverging their roadmaps once they're at a sufficient scale, I think.

2:15:51

Yeah. Is Google still way ahead on cross data center training?

2:16:35

Yes.

2:16:39

Are the other labs like, is that, is that important to the other labs to catch up there, or is it something that will just naturally happen because everything sort of commoditizes? Or do the other labs need to sort of marshal some Herculean effort to like crack the code on what it takes and what Google's doing?

2:16:39

Yeah, so. So it's a couple of things. Right. In 2023, everyone thought that scaling was pre training.

2:16:55

Yeah.

2:17:00

Right. You know, more parameters, more data, and that's very difficult to split across data centers.

2:17:01

And has Google been able to do that?

2:17:06

And Google's been able to do that to an extent. Right. So what they've done is they've got, you know, they don't have the largest individual data center campus, but what they do is they do these like regions where it's like, hey, each data center is roughly 40 miles apart from each other. So in Nebraska and Iowa and then in Ohio they've got like these complexes and now they're building one in Oklahoma, Texas, you know, these complexes where there's all these data centers pretty close to each other.

2:17:07

So it's not really across data center across the world.

2:17:29

Right.

2:17:32

Just across like region.

2:17:33

Yeah. And then that, that makes a lot of the difficulties a lot easier. Flip side is we've also moved to rl.

2:17:34

Right.

2:17:39

And majority of the time of the chips is spent generating data. Right. Only doing forward passes through the model.

2:17:40

Sure.

2:17:46

And then you only send the final tokens that you verified sort of back to train on to the training, to the train to train. Right. So then you end up with like, oh, instead of in pre training scaling, you need to like synchronize all the weights every 10, 20, whatever seconds when you're doing these rollouts, and especially as things get more and more agentic and training, you might not only need to send not the entire weights, but just the tokens that are relevant. So way smaller amount of data and way less frequently. Right. Minutes at a time instead of seconds at a time.

2:17:47

Yeah.

2:18:14

And so you've got this, like, now. Now it's become, like, reasonable where. Oh, actually, multi data center training is completely reasonable. And people do this. People do multi data center, multi chip training.

2:18:15

Sure.

2:18:24

Right. You know, you do your inference on one set of chips and you do your training on another set of chips. So, like, anthropic does this. I don't know if Google does this, but Google's kind of already got the cards.

2:18:24

Yeah, okay, got it. Let's go to this.

2:18:35

But, yeah, talk about just.

2:18:38

There's this debate, TSMC risk. Is that the bottleneck or is energy the bottleneck? I was doing back of the envelope calculations. Seems like we're using maybe like 1% of global energy production or Western energy production on. On AI, specifically workloads. And then we're using like 50% of leading edge fab capacity on AI workloads. And so that feels like. Okay, well, even if we all agree and we say, as a society we're going all in on AI, we can only double the AI chip capacity before we need to build more fabs. That takes years. Whereas we could say, everyone, turn off your air conditioning. We're sending the electricity to the data centers. Right. Like, like we have the ability to digitize without creating new. Did I just get some clapping?

2:18:40

Clapping. Turning off the ac.

2:19:23

Claude needs to eat.

2:19:26

Heat strokes for all the grandmothers.

2:19:27

Yes, yes.

2:19:29

I need my cat dancing videos.

2:19:30

I need to feed Claude. Right. But, but, but, but seriously, like, there's this debate over, you know, is TSMC the main bottleneck or energy the bottleneck? How are you feeling about that?

2:19:32

Yeah, yeah. So, so sidebar before I answer the question, because I think it's fun. Yes. You know, in the US it's insane to say, turn off your AC for AI, Right? And the general public hates AI already, of course. But in Taiwan, they've had droughts before, and they've turned off water to entire cities. They're like, oh, you get to. You get water three days of the week, and then the fab still gets supplied water. It's like, this is. You know, you've got to understand the mindset. We are not ready as weak Americans to do this. No, but at the end of the day, right, like, water, water, water. And power are certainly less big of constraints now. Now you've got to imagine like, you know, semiconductor industry is used to, hey, doubling the amount of transistors made every year or two. Part of that is Moore's Law. Part of that is more, more capacity. Whereas the energy industry in America wasn't. And so like initially people were like not creative. They're like, let's do, let's do these kinds of gas plants. It's like, well, no, now we've realized, you know, yes, there's three main manufacturers of turbines and then you've got for a dual combine cycle, then you've got like igts, but you've also got like medium speed reciprocating engines, right? Like turns out Cummins can make like a million diesel engines a year and like those can make electricity like if I don't give a fuck. And I put it in West Texas, easy. So now it's more of like a regulation thing, a supply chain thing. Power is not a constraint in, in so far like that much, right? I think it certainly is a constraint still. Today it was the biggest constraint in 2425 data center capacity power. Because the industry was not ready. People have woken up, they've sort of been shocked to the system. Now you've got tens of gigawatts being deployed. Next year, 30 gigawatts are being added and we think the power is there for it.

2:19:41

What was this year?

2:21:15

This year is like, I think it's like 18 ish. 10 ish. 15 to 18 ish.

2:21:17

Sorry. So almost a doubling?

2:21:21

Yeah, almost a doubling, yeah.

2:21:23

Wow.

2:21:24

And when you look at, when you look at TSMC and the crew, right there is not really, oh, this random, you know, there's 12 people making medium speed reciprocating engines that you can now convert to make power at some random data center. No, no, no. There's like there is a racket, right? There is one set of spice, like, you know, there's, you know, that's it. Right. And so, and then, and then the flip side is like, okay, when you have 12 vendors, everyone's got a little bit of slack capacity, you know, there's more likelihood, you know, you can, people like, oh, turbines you can't get. You can call a broker and you can get a turbine. You might be paying 50% more to X more, but you can get a turbine. Yeah, right. Like you can't get a 3 nanometer fab. You cannot get a 3 nanometer fab. Exactly. And so when you talk about what's the you know, the, the baton got passed from semiconductor shortages in 23 to power and data centers in 24, 25, 26, were still we're swinging the pendulum, but it will fully be semiconductors again in 27. Right. And so we see this across the entire space of the ecosystem. It's not just tsmc, it's also memory both, because both of them have built at a certain pace. Now. TSMC has been expanding at some rate. The memory makers in fact, have just not expanded capacity. Basically they've not built new fab since 2022 because their cycle is so undulating. Yeah. And so when you look at it, it's like, oh, even if they wanted to double capacity, they need to build the fabs. Right. And building the fabs, it is the most complex building humans make. Right. It's, it's, it's, it's the entire era of a clean room circulates itself every 1.5 seconds. And you don't even feel it when you're inside, really. It's like that. And it's like parts per billion of particles. Right. Like, it's actually insane how you could, you could get coughed in the face by someone who has Covid and not get Covid.

2:21:25

And so it gets circulated so fast it doesn't even hit you.

2:23:07

It's like, it's like that meme of.

2:23:10

Like the spraying when someone's talking and then it's just circulated.

2:23:11

So, so one another. Another sidebar is everyone knows Covid like really popped off in Wuhan. Right. Wuhan also is home to China's largest memory company, ymtc. And so when they were like welding people into their homes, the people who worked in the FAB still went to work.

2:23:14

Wow.

2:23:31

It was because it's, you know, one, it's a national, like, it's national importance. But two, like these people are getting sick. This FAB is like way too clean. Yeah.

2:23:31

Sorry, Jordy.

2:23:40

I want to talk about Oracle. They put out a post this morning that said our partners financing for the Dona Ana County, New Mexico, Shackelford County, Texas and Port Washington, Wisconsin, data centers are secured at market standard rates, progressing through final syndication on schedule and consistent with investment grade deals. Obviously they were fast following their post from yesterday where they said the Nvidia OpenAI deal has zero impact on our feedback financial relationship with OpenAI. We remain highly confident in OpenAI's ability to raise funds and meet its commitments. And obviously everyone was looking at this being like, give me a cigarette. Smoking, like, it's like bank run language. I Haven't seen posts like this since, like the ftx.

2:23:41

Is it just bad comms or is there something worse?

2:24:19

It's terrible comms. Like, like I told my Oracle contacts, like, who the hell is in charge of the Twitter? Like, what are you doing? Nvidia did something similar last year when the whole TPU mania was going on.

2:24:23

Yeah. It was like, we're thrilled with Google's progress with the tpu. That said Nvidia chips are the only. You know, it's like no one asked you to comment. I mean, like, I'm sure a handful of people in your DMs and random, but that doesn't mean it doesn't project confidence.

2:24:35

It's sort of the lion shouldn't concern themselves with the sheep.

2:24:52

Yeah.

2:24:55

And like, okay, Nvidia's line, maybe, maybe Oracle is a little bit more bumpy, but I think Oracle is like, fine.

2:24:55

Yeah.

2:25:00

People are just freaking out because OpenAI is peak. People are peak negative on OpenAI right now because of how good anthropic's been. Killing it. Yeah. I think it's just kind of silly. They need to hire someone to do comms. Like a lulu or something. Right. Both Nvidia and Oracle, because. What are you doing?

2:25:01

How did you process yesterday in general? Jensen was clip farming. He was like, I don't know why he does these street interviews. Right.

2:25:20

No other CEO does those where they just stick 25 microphones in your face and the paparazzi's flashing. It's a great vibe.

2:25:29

It's, you know, Jensen's not been as famous as other CEOs for as long and yet he's so important now. And if you've, like, if you know of Jensen, how he is in meetings, I feel like there's two Jensens, right? There is like pr. Good at pr, just good at talking, good at, like, making people hyped up and believe what he's doing.

2:25:36

He's great at standing on stage, holding up the chip.

2:25:56

And then there's the real Jensen, which is like a business killer. And, like, actually just knows about every, like, aspect of the supply chain, right? All the way from, like, niche semiconductor, you know, design and manufacturing stuff, all the way to like energy, power, data center, like, and then doing the business deals too. Right? And so, like, you've got this whole Pareto, like, of a whole thing, whole range of things that he's good at and he's a killer in. And clearly he's like, he was in a meeting where he was being a killer and like negotiating like Supply contracts or something, he walks out. Yeah, that's my theory.

2:26:00

But I like it. Yeah, that's awesome.

2:26:34

And that's why he was like, you know, like, he was like still killing. Like, no, we never said we committed to 100 billion. You know, like.

2:26:36

And it's like, I don't know, where do you even get the hundred billion dollar number from? It's like, well, you did go on. People would assume that it was, was but, but they did say in the press release. I remember these are early talks but they just kind of jumped the gun. This was the height of the press release economy.

2:26:42

Yeah, yeah. What's funny is Oracle stock peaked like just like a week after they announced the OpenAI deal. And so like the press release of like hey, OpenAI is going to do this humongous deal stock peaks. Same happened with a couple other vendors who announced deals with OpenAI or Nvidia. Like sort of a lot of these, like, like they all peaked to that. And then it's sort of been like Nvidia OpenAI trade has been going poorly and sort of like the TPU anthropic Google Amazon complex has been doing well. It's quite interesting that this happened.

2:27:02

Good, good energy back at home with the roommates.

2:27:31

What's going on in your.

2:27:36

Yeah, I got one more thing. So yes, over the weekend it was sort of drowned out by all the justice department stuff.

2:27:39

But wait, have you guys talked about Elon saying you can smoke a cigar in the fab? No. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. I was going to say that's this is, this is part of the whole.

2:27:47

Thing realized that was related. Yeah, that makes sense.

2:27:55

Yeah.

2:27:58

Indoor heaters. We have indoor heater technology. No one's taking advantage.

2:27:58

Yeah.

2:28:01

What does the fab look like if you have no humans inside? Like that's probably his long term thing is like yeah, there, there will be an optimist.

2:28:02

But no one know like the number of people working a FAB is like irrelevant.

2:28:08

But is it irrelevant because there's all these things you have to do when a human's in there because they sweat and they breathe. And if you don't have to do that because it's a robot walking down, even if it's puppeteered or teleoperated, you might be able to have different considerations. I don't know if that actually affects.

2:28:13

Well, it's like a nesting of. It's a nesting of cleanliness.

2:28:27

Right.

2:28:29

For example, you've got this wafer you've put down, let's say you put down copper. And now you're moving it from one area to another. Well, it needs to be stored in a vacuum. But the easiest way to store a vacuum, like, or an inert gas. And that's like the thing that's being transported. And then around that, you want it to be super clean as well. If you don't, then the copper starts getting oxidized. It affects our yields. All this sort of stuff happens. And so, like, you kind of want it to be a nested layer. Nested layer of like. Well, this. This thing inside the EV tool. Super clean. And then the thing feeding it is super clean. And then the thing it sits in is super clean. Because. Because that's how you get to, like, there's zero particles.

2:28:29

Yeah.

2:29:01

Because, like, you know, in the, in the, in the foup. And the transportation devices is like parts per trillion and maybe foup. It's called F O U p Front operated, front opening. I don't know, something pod. Pod, but it's called a foup. It's like the thing that moves and it carries the wafer. And then. And then the fab is like parts per billion. And, you know, sort of like, you know, you've got to, like, got this nesting relationship. So everything is super clean. You know, I'm bullish on robots. Like, super bullish on robots, but only for, like, not for tasks that have, like, TSMC's Arizona Fabs or, okay, let's say TSMC Tainan, which I think produces, like, you know, indirectly hundreds of billions of dollars of global gdp. Even directly, it's like still tens of billions of dollars has like 5, 10,000 people in it. Like, it's like, irrelevant in terms of the number of people who work there.

2:29:02

In terms of the overall economic value that's created.

2:29:48

Right. It's like, it's like. It's like how many people fold laundry or how many people wash dishes or how many people, like, do construction work. Like, these are way bigger markets for robotics.

2:29:51

Yeah, yeah. Speaking of China, what are you making of the Dario essay? Or I guess his comments at Davos about selling chips to China is equivalent to nuclear weapons these days? The Ben Thompson line was something like, he's okay selling chips because he wants dependency on the Nvidia ecosystem Cuda, but he would ban lithography tools from going to China. And I'm always. I've been wrestling with this idea of, like, I don't know if China would accept this, but wouldn't there be a different world where you want them dependent on American LLM APIs, and you don't even send them the chips. And you say, yeah, you can have as much AI as you want as long as you're paying OpenAI and anthropic API.

2:29:58

Yeah. I think it's like a curve of.

2:30:44

Like, what they will accept.

2:30:46

It's, it's, it's, you know, one, you, you, you push someone into the corner, they're going to start swinging. Right. And I'm like, very concerned that China does this. Right. Do they, do you, do you push them too far into the corner? Do they say, screw this, we're going to start being a lot more aggressive. We're going to, we're going to, you know, do more military actions or.

2:30:48

Military actions, or even just invest twice.

2:31:05

As much in global supply chains, like take over Africa more than they already have, like Latam, like, et cetera. There's, there's or, or take over Taiwan.

2:31:07

Yeah, right.

2:31:15

Because if I can't have the chips, what value is there in Taiwan existing?

2:31:16

Sure, sure.

2:31:18

In its current state.

2:31:19

Right.

2:31:20

So there's like, there's this, like, game theory aspect.

2:31:20

Yeah.

2:31:22

At the same time, you don't want China to be able to, like, you know, if you believe AI is going to be, do what I think many, at least in San Francisco think it's going to do, which is like, completely revolutionize humanity and cause GDP growth to accelerate. Do you want to have China also own that technology and their ability to integrate that into their military and all these other things much faster? You know, so there is like, these competing, like, you know, interests.

2:31:23

Yeah.

2:31:47

Where.

2:31:47

Where is the, like, right line? And some people think it's like, hey, yeah, sell them AI model. Well, I think Dario would say don't even sell them AI model access.

2:31:48

Don't even sell them tokens.

2:31:54

Yeah, I think so. I think, like, I think Anthropic does not sell AI access to China. Yeah. They loop it through and you can see this in the traffic data. They go through Korea and Japan, other places, but, like. And so they get it.

2:31:55

Yeah.

2:32:05

And then the other, other side is like, sort of like, I think like the Ben Thompson view, which is like. And I think I'm more sympathetic to that, although I think I'm not exactly aligned with that, which is like. And we've been saying, like, don't sell them equipment, don't sell them equipment, don't sell them equipment. And my, my argument is like, more economic in the sense of, like, if you sell them, like, tens of billions of dollars equipment, they can make hundreds of billions of dollars in AI value or chips with that equipment. Whereas if you sell them AI model access and it costs them this much to get the economic, you know, they're not able to.

2:32:06

You're capturing more of the value.

2:32:32

Exactly. And so that's sort of the question that is at foot here. Right. Do you want them to capture all this value of the supply chain in equipment or by buying the chips or using the models. Right. And services. And we've seen, you know, across many stacks, China refuses to accept, you know, using American ecosystem. And they'll wait many years before they develop their own. Whether it was like, hey, they didn't use Windows, they figured out a bootlegging economy, or they didn't use Visa, and eventually they came out with like Alipay and WeChat Pay or whatever it's called on. And like, these things are way better than Visa, in fact. Right. Lower transaction cost and higher volume.

2:32:33

We use Red Star Linux. It's North Korea's Linux distribution.

2:33:12

Wait, really?

2:33:15

Yeah. If you, if you don't, if you put it on a network, it'll immediately call home. So you have to put it on a firewall network or else it just like steals everything and immediately.

2:33:15

I'm a fan of Templeos, you know.

2:33:25

Is Doug o' Laughlin suffering from a case of Claude code psychosis?

2:33:30

Okay, yes, yes. So I think everyone's like, claude code is for coders. And it's like, no, Claude code is for people who don't code now.

2:33:35

Right.

2:33:43

And that's the big realization this year. We've got a couple folks now in the firm who have psychosis, but Douglas o', Laughlin, who is like, you know, semi analysis number two, he's president, you know, he's my boy. He's the one, in fact, he's the one who encouraged me to make a substack a long time in the go, a long time ago.

2:33:43

What were you doing before?

2:34:00

I had a WordPress blog and I was like, consulting on the side. But I was like, okay, let me do a substack now. Because I saw him making money off it. I was like, this is shit. Like, why are you getting paid for this? There were multiple times where he wrote something I was like, I could do way better.

2:34:01

I'll show you.

2:34:15

Like, obviously, like, it was good because we both taught each other a lot of things and we've been great friends. And eventually he joined semianalysis. But, like, you know, his background is he was a hedge fund analyst and then he decided to do a substack slash walk Hike the Continental Divide Trail for, like, six months, walking from Mexico to. And then, you know, came back to doing substacking.

2:34:17

Tried to do a fun six months of touching grass. And then he was like, I'm ready to lock it on clock.

2:34:35

Go. Yeah. And so now he's, you know, like, he's never been a software developer, right? But he's been on a generational run. Like, he's. He's. He's not coding anything, right? He's just telling Claude to do stuff. And, like, it's to the point where it's like our, like, head of data, head of IT is like, oh, can you send me that? And he's like, how do I do that? And then he, like, he zips the whole thing and sends it to him. It's like, local host. He sends him a leak once. It's like, local host.

2:34:38

But, yeah, no, I've talked to some folks who vibe code and they'll be like. And I'll be like, why'd you choose Node js?

2:35:03

And the.

2:35:08

They're like, what's Node Jazz? That's a very specific someone. Yeah. Tyler.

2:35:08

We went on a little tour of a lot of our clients. Like, you know, roughly like, half our business is or 40% of our business is like, hedge funds. So we went to New York a week, two weeks ago, and we went to all of our clients. And, like, part of it's like them asking me, is OpenAI fucked? And I'm answering like, no, I think they're fine. And then like, some, like, actual ideas. And then like, a lot of his. Doug, just telling them cloud code is like, they're like, you don't have to hire any junior hedge fund analysts anymore. And they're like the junior hedge fund analyst. And then he's explaining, you know, what can you do? It's like, well, like, you can just do, like, financial models and perform a financial models and, like, everything in cloud code without ever opening Excel. And you can generate charts and, like, you don't need to know how to code. You just need to know how, like, how this stuff generally works. And you can just do it.

2:35:15

How many hedge funds are just trying to copy trade situational awareness?

2:35:57

I mean, I think everyone who's. I think. I think a lot of hedge funds obviously believe in AI. I think there's a lot of them who don't believe in it. Right. To be clear. But a lot of them that have done the best believe in it.

2:36:03

Why are they selling software everywhere?

2:36:13

Oh, you mean selling software stocks?

2:36:15

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

2:36:17

Why the sell off then?

2:36:18

Yeah, I mean, I mean, of course it's like an incremental thing. Right. But anyway, so, so these hedge funds, like, and then the question is like, okay, if you believe in it, how do you manifest that trade? And so when you look across the ecosystem, I would say almost all my clients sometimes think are two years out, numbers are too high. But like there's, there's like Leopold's like your numbers are too low. And so it's like, it's like, it's like in general, right? And I think, I think like, if you think about how much do you believe in AI and what's your access to information of AI? You know, there's not many hedge funds who live in San Francisco and like fully breathe and live and understand it then. And then depending on how much you believe in AI, how do you manifest that trait? Right.

2:36:19

Are you surprised that more hedge funds wouldn't like even just smaller shops wouldn't say, like, hey, this AI thing seems like it's going to be big, maybe we should set up in San Francisco or higher.

2:36:59

There's a number of people, right? So we're getting an office together. Leopold, myself, Dwarkesh, and then a client of mine, another hedge fund, and they have one analyst here and it's like, and there's like a number of other hedge funds that are like hiring analysts here. But you know, being plugged into the AI ecosystem does not mean you're just in San Francisco because you can just walk around and talk to like doofus, like startups and VCs and like not actually, you know, see what's coming down the pipeline. And you have to combine it with all sorts of information, right? You have to have a good tune with like what's going on in Asia supply chains. You have to have a good tune with what's going on in New York.

2:37:09

Sure.

2:37:41

You have to get tuned with like what's going on like in the, in the financial markets, right? And then like what's going on in credit markets and what's going on in all, you know, the data center, energy, blah, blah, blah, all these different industries. And so it's, it's, it's actually not like so simple to like be in tune with what's going on in AI. You can easily get like head faked. Right? You know, for the longest time people were thinking, you know, Adobe's an AI company and like, and it's like for a bit like Adobe was going down on AI and then they like launched a few AI features And the stock skyrocketed. And then now it's going back down again because people realize, oh, wait, no, actually it's not an AI company. I think it's the manifestation and thought of what is actually going to the world going to like. If anthropic 3x is its revenue again this year, OpenAI 2x's its revenue again this year, or by the end of the year, how many people even believe by the end of the year, AI startup revenue is over $100 billion? I think that's an insane statement for a lot of people, but that's what it's going to be. And who believes that number? Very few people. And then you draw the continuation. It's like, who believes? And when Anthropic says in their funding, like, hey, we're have $300 billion of revenue by the end of the decade. And it's like, actually, I think that number's too low because the economic value of what they're going to create is going to be insane. And you tell people, oh, OpenAI is going to have 18 gigawatts or 16 gigawatts by the end of 28, and they're gonna be able to pay for it. And that's like, well, that's $300 billion to spend. How they gonna pay for it? It's like, you sweet summer child, don't worry, Sam can raise. They're gonna blow up on revenue. They're fine. Right? Like, it is like a bit of a vibe thing. It's a bit of like, you know, irrational exuberance almost. Right. Like, Liv holds in his mid-20s. Like, I'm 29. Like, we are irrational, right? Because we have not lived through. You know, you get these PMs who, like, never been.

2:37:41

You've never been that humble.

2:39:29

I don't know. Like, we almost. My family almost went bankrupt in 2008. Like, you know, because we lived in a motel and we almost foreclosed and we actually did foreclose on one motel. It's like, pretty bad. But, like, yeah, I mean, I was still a kid, right? Like, it was like, yeah, yeah. I've never been humble.

2:39:31

It's good. I mean, it's good to live through that and understand how things can go wrong. What are you expecting out of Zuck and Meta this year? We've been big Zuck defenders especially. I mean, there's this pressure of like, oh, Meta is spending so much, and yet they haven't created any AI product that's super compelling or that's really Working. And our stance has generally been Meta's making more money from AI than almost any company in the world outside of Nvidia. So it's like, of course Zuck should be justified in saying, hey, this is real, it's big. I'm gonna back the truck up and go all in.

2:39:42

Yeah, I mean it's clear if you look at the most recent earnings, I think their CPM went up 9% when the consumer's weak, which means if you were to try and strip out what is consumer spending increasing for CPM of ads versus what is the effectiveness of their algorithms? Algorithm got better by double digits in one quarter. It's actually insane how good the algo's getting at serving you the slop and the ads, right? So in that sense, the pig sound.

2:40:19

The trough, I gotta hear slop for the slops.

2:40:48

We're going all in on that. All in on the farm.

2:40:54

I love it.

2:41:00

So, you know, if you think about it, right, like, okay, metas, where are they going to like win, right? You know, I think if you have the Galaxy Brain take, it's like, well, they've got the best like wearables coming down the pipeline. They're going to put AI on it. Apple won't be able to put good AI on their wearables or they'll seed it all to like Google or.

2:41:01

The other thing is people, people have had this narrative, oh, as AI gets better, the value of real world experiences will increase. And I think that's a cool theory, but if you actually play it out, AI getting better means more content that's more like effectively crafted for you, more personalized, 100 times more thousand, a million times more more content. That would imply to me that people will just use digital products more, which means more time on site, more time in the app for meta. So I don't know.

2:41:19

I, I mean I, I'm, I'm with you entirely. But I think, I think like the Galaxy intake is that you're just going to have a wearable and that's going to have AI assistant. OpenAI is trying to make it wearables, you know, you know there's, there's, you know, everyone's trying to make wearables, Google is, et cetera, et cetera. I think meta will actually execute and then they'll have the, a good AI and then you stack on like a few things. Right. How do they get users? Well, we've seen at least if you look at the user metric charts, Google's use, you know, OpenAI's users were growing, growing, growing. They were gonna hit a trillion by the end of the year. 800 billion. Why did they not keep growing in the last quarter? It's because Nano Banana came out and they took all the incremental users. Right. And likewise, if you go look at like, you know, Gemini 3 didn't actually make Google grow that much. It was Nana Banana and then Pro or two or whatever it's called. Right. Those are the ones that made them really grow. Meta's licensed all of Midjourney's code data models. Right. One, two. They're like actually just like focusing hardcore on.

2:41:51

Was that a billion dollar plus deal?

2:42:46

The number is undisclosed. Midjourney still exists as a company.

2:42:50

No, it felt, it looked to me like effectively a massive exit. But the best case scenario where they continue just keep kind of being artists.

2:42:54

I think if you had me guess, I would bet it's over a billion.

2:43:02

Right?

2:43:05

Every deal that Meta did was over a billion. Basically, whether it's an employment contract, a licensing deal, an acquisition, everything had a B after it.

2:43:06

Well, so the interesting thing is that.

2:43:15

Is you're missing a zero again. Don't never miss the zero again.

2:43:17

Yeah, Every discussion was how many billions are we spending on hiring this person buying this company?

2:43:20

Well, Meta interestingly has gone down market for a compute because they, there's not enough compute in the big size deal. So they've actually gone and like bought like small clusters.

2:43:26

Oh.

2:43:36

Because it's like. Well, I want more like from like.

2:43:36

Long tail Neo clouds.

2:43:39

Yeah, just like. Yeah, from a longer tail.

2:43:40

Okay.

2:43:42

Because that's the only place they can get the compute. They need interest because you know, they've already like went out and signed big deals with Google and Core Weave and so on.

2:43:42

So cluster max 3 gonna be a smaller shark because of consolidation in the industry.

2:43:48

No, it's, there's more.

2:43:52

It's gonna be bigger.

2:43:53

It's gonna be bigger, bigger. But, but you know, so, so metal. That's ominous.

2:43:53

It's ominous.

2:44:01

So I think Meta will, you know, capture consumers through Generative. If there's more content, people are just going to go to the content marketplace. Right. The creator of the content captures less value as there are more content creators and more diversification of content. Right. And so I think Meta just wins by being a platform. Right. Google does too. And bytedance does too.

2:44:03

Right.

2:44:22

But like those three win by having a platform and then the real question is can they get in the assistant productivity game? Right. And I think this is important and.

2:44:22

Through that effectively search like if you're an assistant. It means that you can. Like there's some commerce happening.

2:44:32

Well, they spin out and poached a bunch of people from Google. So this wasn't in the media much, but like they actually poached Google search people with similar sized deals as like these crazy. Yeah.

2:44:37

Research.

2:44:46

Yeah. And I always, I always, I, you know, demoing, demoing any of the wearables you can imagine. Like, Meta wants you to walk around in the world and see like, oh, what are those headphones? And like, while we're talking, I just hit my little thing and buy it. Right. And it's like you didn't even necessarily know that it happened. But like, of course Meta is going to want to.

2:44:46

Everyone knows those are the Sony MDR X272 462.

2:45:03

Dude, I've been, I've been screaming about them, like doing something, some proper marketing, branding. It's. It's literally like they're over here is like WHX1000XM5 and then their in ear is like WF1000XM1000. It's like, dude, just call them like Bravia Buds and Bravia like headphones or some.

2:45:07

Well then China just bought Sony.

2:45:26

Yeah. Bravia brand's actually a Chinese company now. Sony sold their TV and PlayStation Buds. Yeah, yeah.

2:45:29

Walkman. Oh, yeah.

2:45:37

Come on.

2:45:39

Something. Something for sure.

2:45:41

Anyway. Anything else, Jordy?

2:45:43

No, this is great. I'm excited for this weekend.

2:45:45

Yeah, yeah. Super excited. You guys are.

2:45:48

What are some plays? We don't watch a lot of sports.

2:45:50

What are some plays?

2:45:53

Football guy. Right?

2:45:54

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Rural Georgia. So I like football. High school football was the thing. College football was the thing. I think NFL is a little less soulful.

2:45:54

Sure.

2:46:05

But, you know, now, now college football has, has, has the nil. And it's also soulless to some extent. It's fine. We. We enjoy it. You know, primal desire of seeing heads clash. And sometimes that manifests in like, you know, Twitter drama and sometimes that manifests in real football.

2:46:05

Yeah.

2:46:20

All I can say is fuck the Patriots.

2:46:21

Okay.

2:46:23

Whoa. Okay. Okay. I'm kind of bummed.

2:46:23

We're.

2:46:26

We're gonna. We're gonna. We're going to be at the game. We're not going to really get the great experience seeing the ads.

2:46:26

I'm going to be like, glued.

2:46:31

I'm going to be like, glued to my phone. I want to see all the AI. The different.

2:46:32

Well, don't worry. I got some more ads for you. Thank you so much for coming.

2:46:37

Thank you so much. Great segue. This message has been brought to you.

2:46:40

By Public Investing for those who take it seriously. Stocks, options, crypto, treasuries and more with great customer service. Also speaking of ads, we're brought to you by Vibe Co where DTC brands, B2B startups, AI companies advertise on streaming TV, pick channels, target audiences and measure sales. Just like on Meta. What else is in the news? Jordy, before we get out of here.

2:46:44

We never somehow never covered this. Waymo yes, confirmed that they raised 16 billion at 126 billion posts according to.

2:47:05

Ed Ludlow over a bunch of VC victory.

2:47:12

Sequoia getting in the mix DST Global.

2:47:15

It was sort of a bold move for a lot of VC firms to go in so early as the company was sort of spinning out.

2:47:17

And of course, of course Google via Alphabet did 13 billion of the round themselves. So this is sort of them.

2:47:23

The.

2:47:32

Medal of Honor on themselves. That's what you're referring to. Exactly, yes. While you pull up the next one, let me tell you about figma. Figma make isn't your average Vibe coding tool. It lives in Figma so outputs look good, feel real and stay connected to how teams build, create codeback prototypes and apps.

2:47:32

Pull up this post from Redaction. Okay, it is Twitter. Every time a minor AI advancement occurs, this new block meta changes everything.

2:47:44

This new block meta. There's a lot of this going on. Well, you know what else changes everything? Gemini 3 Pro, Google's most intelligent model yet. State of the art reasoning. Next level Vibe coding and deep multimodal understanding.

2:47:55

YC wants you to start an AI Rentech. They want you to just do it.

2:48:11

Get out there and do it. Start an AI Rentech and then get on Phantom cash, fund your wallet without exchanges or middlemen and spend with a phantom card. And that's our show. Goodbye.

2:48:18