Break Glass in Case of Stanley Cup Playoffs

Can I just say this? Yeah. Maybe somebody will explain to me, I'm just asking, why do you need to? Great question. Well, the Panthers have to. They do? Yeah, Stanley C. Panther and Victor E. Ratt. I actually, I should know this because I've been there for three Stanley Cubs finals in a row. Yeah. You're too busy getting in fights with the fans there to notice the mascot. The cameraman's like, do you know the pack heat here? Oh yeah, thanks for the ride. Welcome to 32 Thoughts, the podcast presented by your Canadian Toyota dealers and the 100% Electric BZ, available now during red tag days. Dom, Elliot, Kyle, with you once again. Before we go any further, are there any wardrobe or appearance critiques you would like to share with the rest of the class, Elliot, that are at the top of your mind? Kevin said that he was much more impressed with your sideburns today. Okay. They're no different than they were two days ago, but it's nice to hear. Yeah, we all know that's wrong. I loved your intermission interview with Gully. There are people out there who are not crazy about the intermission interviews and you can always try to make them better, but I thought yours with him was great. What did you say to him? Can this go all game? And he's like, why not? Yeah, he's like, yeah, I can. And it will. Great answer. Great job. But what did you see there? What did you notice at the arena? Oh, that was an awesome game. First and foremost, Elliot. Game one was great. Game two blew the first one out of the water. And I will say this, I saw Max Lapierre who's down here working for TVS Sports. I saw after game one, he was a little harsh on the Tampa atmosphere there and the building. And the problem is, because you can't compare it to, you can't compare any building to what? Can't compare anything, yes. To Montreal. But I really like doing games here. And it was a little more reserved. We're always trying to take a pulse when the teams come out onto the ice before the game. Like how loud does it get? What's the building feel like? And it felt a little more reserved and you're like, ah, like is this a nervous crowd? Are they a little down on their group because of what happened in game one because of their struggles at home in the playoffs that's now spanning like three years bizarrely for a team like the Lightning? Anyways, I didn't take very long for that to be brushed off to the side. What an incredible game. What an incredible display of electricity, of physicality, of veracity. It was fantastic. So at the end of that first period, we're standing in the hallway there waiting to interview Gulley. And I kind of wondered like, you know, what would Marty St. Louis think of a period like that because his game was not, let's scrum it up every whistle. Like there's certainly more art to how he views the game of hockey as a player and as a coach. Like how did he feel all that? And I just saw him coming down the hallway and just the little smirk on his face. Like it was almost like, yeah, Tampa Bay laid down the gauntlet and our guys didn't shy away or blink whatsoever. And then the end of the second intermission, I'm swocking down the Tampa Bay hallway and one of their equipment guys, he looked like he was carrying like a handful or an armful of kindling with all the broken sticks and the busted blades. Like it was just nothing was getting out of benchmark international arena unscathed on Tuesday night. It was really great. It is fascinating. Like it's hard to believe that going into this game too, that Tampa had lost 10 of 11 playoff home games and all the ones in overtime too. Like that's not Tampa. Like it's unbelievable. And I think, you know, there was certainly part of the messaging and then going into overtime from Cooper to his group was it's time to change the narrative. So they did that. I think Brandon Hagle has been the best player in the series through two games, two overtime, back and forth, lead changes, great drama. Five more games of this. I don't know if we can all take it, but we can take it. We can take it. Sign me up. Yeah, great hockey. I agree. If I'm the Canadians, I'm disappointed. You can sit there and you can say, all right, we got a split on the road. Great. And you have to do that now. But you were up to one in this after two periods. You had a chance to take two. And unfortunately, Slavkoski give away, you had a power play late in the game regulation, couldn't close it and then overwhelmed. No shots, nine nothing in overtime. The doc play where he doesn't get the red line, it leads to the icing where they score the winning goal. And the thing that's interesting about that is, as you heard, San Luis admitted that didn't like that play. That's a lot for San Luis. You know, he generally knows that if you criticize a player in Montreal, you give everybody licensed to criticize them. And he's very careful about that stuff. Any chance you think you see Gallagher for doc in game three? We were wondering that walking out of the arena, that exact thing, Elliot. I think there's a real possibility. One way or another that Brennan Gallagher gets in now that they're back at home to maybe a get a bit of a different look. And also, don't profess to know what Saint Louis is thinking at this point in time. But now that they have last change for the next two games, got to find a way to get that Suzuki line going five on five because it even strength through two. It's not very good. It's been a grind for them. Yeah, it's been quiet. It's been very quiet. Great series. And as you said, we're going to get five more games of that. Lost opportunity for them. Series is exactly what I expected. Dobish has been really good. He almost saved them in this one. Lots more to come. They have two days off, which means even Kyle Bacoskis can leave his hotel room in Montreal. See you on Friday night. Oh, can't wait. Will you leave your hotel room with two nights off? I will just for you. Okay, I'm glad to hear that. All right, LA at Monday night. Finally, we saw the Oilers and the Ducks kick off their first round series. And amazingly for the first time this year, no points, Connor McDavid, no problem for the Oilers. Two goals from Jason Dickinson, who we weren't sure was going to play right up until game time. Two from Kasperi Kappinen and for an Oilers team with some unfinished business. Maybe some good feelings early of it wasn't McDavid taking over the game, but some other guys feeling important early on in this journey. That was a great hockey game, a really entertaining game. And dry saddle was excellent. He looked like he was in perfect form on the way back. He was a horse. You remember that when he got hurt, there was all this panic of how long he was going to be out, but the Oilers didn't seem too worried about it. I think they really felt that if everything went on schedule, he would be back on time. And if you watched them skate the last few days before game one, it really looked like it. I can't even admit this. I'm a little more concerned about Dickinson. You could see there were points during the game. He was laboring. He was going out and he was just trying it from point to point. I think he's so important because when he's healthy, everyone slots in there. And now Adam Henrique is hurt. He won't play game two. So I think it's even more important that he's healthy and people slot in properly. I just don't know. The only negative I think for that game from Edmonton is I watched Dickinson and I watched how he's gutting it out and you just don't know how long he's going to be able to last if it or if there's any reason he might not be able to play the full two months of Edmonton goes on another run. He is clearly gutting it out like many of these players do and he's not 100%. The thing I liked about it for Edmonton is they had the lead, they blew the lead, they were losing and they just stayed calm. They understand what the playoffs is all about. It's rotting the emotional wave and they did it and they found a way to win. Ingram battled. At home made an incredible play on Michael Grandland late in regulation. I think the one thing Anaheim showed was that we were kind of wondering which team would show up and would these guys be nervous? Well, Leo Carlson didn't look nervous. Seneca didn't look nervous. Jackson LeComme didn't look nervous. I think that even if Anaheim was to lose a relatively short series, if that happened, I think they showed that they're going to give Edmonton battles during these games. It's not going to be easy and if the docs were going to sit there and we were going to think they were just happy to be here, that's not going to be the case. They're going to go toe to toe with them. They're going to challenge them and it's going to be a hard series, but I really liked the way Edmonton reacted when they were pushed. I thought they were very good. Ten shots on goal for Carlson in game number one. He had a couple of points. Seneca had six, though still looking for his first playoff point. I shouldn't say still it's been one game, but it's an interesting- That lengthy playoff for Seneca has come to an end. It's really got to be weighing on him. I can only imagine. But for an Anaheim team, we were talking about this, watching some of the games on our off-night down here in Tampa. But the way that that group can play and be a little bit more loose and I would say the willing to take risks offensively and would that put the Edmonton Oilers in an uncomfortable situation? Certainly it did at times. The wonder about Anaheim's ability to stick with it here as the series goes on, to just see how far they can push the Oilers out of their comfort zone and into a game they may not have an interest in playing. Be interesting. I just think we've got an 8-7 game somewhere in this series. Yes. I hope we do. I hope I'm right about that. I hope we get some 8-7s and some 10-9s. I generally think Dostal is too good for that and Ingram's really battled. But Anaheim gave a better showing. I just didn't know what to expect from them. Would they? Yeah, we've done it. This is house money. Yeah, we're just happy to be here. Obviously they weren't. I just wanted to see how they looked and they looked pretty good. They battled. Okay. The Ottawa Senators, Carolina Hurricanes. I think to this point, if you were to pick out the most heartbreaking loss yet in these playoffs, it was Ottawa in game number two in double overtime. Incredible drama with the offside and the penalty shot that was awarded and the no goal and all of the posts that Ottawa had there. You could tell that there was such a weight off their shoulders and finally scoring in the series. But that's going to want to be one. I mean, you talked about how disappointed Montreal must feel after having a lead and opportunity to take both on the road. I can only imagine what the trip was like for the Sands back home, knowing the chances they had to leave Raleigh with a split and did not. Okay. So you want to get to the crazy stuff after. I give a lot of credit to Frederick Anderson because the 2-2 goal was a really ugly goal and you're wondering if he would melt down after that. He didn't. He stayed calm and he didn't give up another one. I thought it was the best game. All-Marc played as a senator that I saw. I thought he was incredible. I cannot believe that Tim Stutzla didn't have eight goals in this particular game. You could see his frustration. He had great chance after great chance after great chance. And Marc Jankowski, who we thought ended the game in overtime, the goal that was disallowed made a great play to get stick on stick and prevent Stutzla from scoring one of those overtime winners. The way that I look at it is, I don't think it's over. I think it's a big challenge. Otto has got a whole serve at home, but I don't think it's over. I really felt they had to get one break. They did. They got it to overtime. They could have won. It's frustrating and Carolina is a hell of a team, but Otto was there. They lost 2-0 and crazily in overtime. You cannot fall apart and you have to stick to your plan. Like I said, I said it on the last pod. I wonder if there's any chance they go to it, Kyle. Kaliah, 40 goals in the AHL. Do you just put them in because you need a score? Sometimes I don't know how Green feels about him, but I just can't help but look at it and wonder, do they just try it? Just to try it. But maybe they have to lose another one before they think about it. All right now, the crazy play. There was a lot of reaction to this, obviously. Number one is the rule. I think a lot of people didn't realize that that rule existed, rule 38.7, that the penalties happen after a play is blown dead for offside. I did know that rule existed. I had to ask which one it was. I couldn't remember which one it was, but I knew that rule existed. The reason that rule exists is so that if a player sees an obvious offside and he knows this isn't going to count, they go and commit some heinous physical foul against another player and say, I can't penalize me. It was offside. So I'm just going to go out there and I'm going to decapitate someone. Now, there were some people who were saying you should get rid of that rule. You shouldn't have it. I don't know. I'm fine with it. And then some people were saying, well, it should only be for majors and not minors or penalty shots or anything. And I just said there's enough gray area or judgment calls in the rulebook. This is letter of the law, black and white. I prefer that. We have enough judgment calls. We don't need any more. I am fine with this. And to be honest, it led to an incredible moment of high level entertainment. So I might even more be in favor of it after seeing it happen. It was funny, Kyle. I had one hilarious text exchange with someone in the league who said that the interpretation was wrong. And I said, what do you mean the interpretation was wrong? And he goes, it's a penalty shot. It's not a penalty. The way that the rule reads, it's a penalty and a penalty shot is not a penalty. And I said, it is literally called a penalty shot. Or it is a kind of penalty and it should be allowed to happen. And we were arguing with each other literally for about 15 texts. He was like, no, it's not a penalty. And I said, yes, it is. It's a penalty shot. He goes, that is not a penalty. I said, then why is it say penalty in the world? Word. Like we did. And we, Kyle, you'll be not surprised to know we did not solve this argument. We were refused to concede to each other's point. And, and, and, sounded like you guys were on a path to a conclusion, solution, somewhere. We were going to solve world peace after that, but then, because the thing is, I said, is that, you know, what happened, if the penalty shots didn't count, and this played occurred, people would have said, well, the penalty shot should count, because the word penalties in it. So either way, you were screwed. I said, just leave it the way it is and count it. There were lots of arguments about this. I think, I think once people realized what the rule said, they understood why the penalty shot happened, but then they started moving on to other things. And there were, I had people that said to me that wasn't even a penalty shot. And I go, are you guys crazy? Of course. First of all, well, hold on. No, I was shocked. It was a penalty shot. Well, the only reason you were shocked is they didn't call it on Greg earlier. But my point is that should have been a penalty shot too. All of these things should be penalty shots. Greg should have been a penalty shot. That's a penalty shot. And I was glad they gave Byfield a penalty shot on Tuesday night in the Colorado LA game. Call the penalty shots. These are scoring chances. We're in the entertainment business. People want to see this stuff. We want to promote goals. We want to promote chances. Nobody in that building was sitting down. Call the penalty shots. Oh, you didn't get the puck till the hash marks. Who cares? He was in alone. Like I tend to agree with you idea of like call more penalty shots, but of all the ones throughout this year, including earlier in that given game, you're right. We're not called a penalty shot. They should have called it on Greg. They should have called it on Greg. And for that one to be pointing to center ice, I was like, wow, what? Crazy. And I suppose justice in the end that Martinuk ends up being the hero. And what a, I mean, I thought credit to him, like I can only imagine what he was feeling on the penalty shot attempt. And I liked the fact that he just like gripped it and ripped it, tried to beat all mark glove side, all mark made a good save. But that was a heck of a shot on the winner too. Happy for Martinuk. Like as you know, is blood, sweat and tears for that organization. So neat moment for him to celebrate in overtime. As the hurricane said in their social media post, Puck don't lie. Yes. Puck don't lie. Now there's a couple more here. First of all, I don't know where this started, but there was somebody put out there that if they said that if Carolina had accidentally put the puck in their own net on the delayed penalty, they still would have gotten a chance with the penalty shot. No, I think that's, I think that's not true yet. Yes. You're right. So it's rule 84.2. There's only can be one goal on a play if the, if the team shoots the pocket in their own goal, games over and the teams that was to be penalized declared the winner. So that's over. Now the other thing is of course the play that was offside. And you know, I, so I called the video room and I got the explanation and it was that they felt that Jordan stall, I didn't have possession and control. They said he had possession, but not control on the play. We'll get to whether or not you agree or disagree in a second, but you know, people were like, that doesn't make any sense. Possession and control are the same thing. And Kyle, I reach a point where I say, just don't throw any more gasoline on the fire on social media. I was like, I could write this, but I'm not going to. I'm just going to let it sit and see if other people explain it. You know, in hockey, possession and control are two different things. You can look it up at various points in the rulebook. Possession is the last person or team to touch the puck. Clearly Jordan stall was the last person to touch the puck. Control is basically, do you do something with it that shows you have control of it? And you know, I guess they felt that he had the bobble just as he went over the line, the slight bobble, and that meant that he didn't have control and they blew it dead. You know, Ron played a play from Connor McDavid and I remember that play. I thought that was a goal too and they didn't count it. And when you look at those two plays next to each other, yes, you can see. You know, we've talked about this before. I think that, you know, we're skinning the onion way too tight a lot of the time, but it's Colin Campbell's law of unintended consequences. You know, if you're going to call this, this is what you're going to get sometimes. And I know Jordan stall couldn't believe it. I saw his reaction and there were people that felt that it was the wrong call. But when you look at the 10 and generally I feel that it's so, it's almost so invisible to the naked eye and I'm pro goal. I want goals, but if you look at that McDavid one and you look at that one, I could see why they did it even though I got to admit I really don't like it. Yeah, the problem is it's, as we talked about, when you open Pandora's box, you can't have it. Well, if it's really close, then it just don't review it. We're too far gone beyond that. Also credit to whoever on the hurricane staff is in charge of breaking down Ottawa's power play. They have got that figured out through two games. And one of the adjustments that Ottawa needs to make going forward along with some other things to try to get back into this series. Okay. No, by the way, one more thing about the offsides. There were people who asked me there should be a time limit because Carolina had the puck for a while before the penalty shot was called and Ottawa blew the plate and Ottawa finally was able to knock it dead. People were like, there should be a time limit. When they brought this in, the offside challenge, it was debated. And the NHL felt very strongly, nope, that if the play is offside, it's tainted until they get it out. Cole and Campbell actually told me that some of the people in the hockey ops were saying, hey, if you can't get the puck out in 15 seconds, it's your fault. But Bill Daly and Gary Bettman felt very strongly. They know the play is tainted. It stays tainted until you're clear. And if there's one thing I know about Bettman, if he decides something, pretty easy to get him to change his mind. Not just out of curiosity, Kyle, have you been reading this Tom Dundon stuff with his new team, the Portland Trailblazers of the NBA? No, I have not found time to read through that yet. But please enlighten me and all of us. Are you familiar with what I'm talking about, though? No, I mean, other than he's bought into that. Okay, so he's bought into the Portland Trailblazers. He's now the majority owner. And there's been a number, they're in the first round of the NBA playoffs and they just won game two. They beat San Antonio. When Bayanna, the tremendous young player for the Spurs, he fell and like hit his jaw on the floor in game number two and he left with a concussion. Hope he's okay. And the Trailblazers came back and won. But there's a bunch of stories locally about Dundon's ownership of the Trailblazers. Staff required to check out of hotels by 12, 30 p.m. to avoid late fees. Two-way players, which is a kind of NBA player, they're like depth players, aren't allowed to travel to playoff games to cut costs. No free t-shirts for fans at the home game, game three. I didn't realize this, but apparently they have two mascots in Portland. I don't know why, but he's looking at canceling one of them. And also, yeah, I didn't even know they had two. But also, you know, they, so Chauncey Billups was their head coach, but he was caught in that big gambling sting. So he was suspended or whatever happened. And they have another coach, a former player named Thiago Splitter. And apparently he did a really good job this year. But it's been reported that Dundon's looking at other coaches and he wants to pay a salary. It's been reported that is low by NBA standards. And in one of these stories, I read that someone said that, according to sources, um, Dundon had said, why are we wasting money? And let's think about this prudently. And I was reading all this and I was saying, boy, does this bring back memories. Like you remember when Dundon took over in Carolina, remember he let go of Chuck Keaton and people were furious at him. Because Chuck Keaton was such a, the radio play by play voice, he was such a legend in the franchise and in the market. And I was texting someone I know in the NBA about it and they were like, you know, he's going to realize this is not the NHL. You can't get away with that here. And I wrote back to this guy, I said, maybe, but we all dealt with this stuff and we all covered this stuff when Dundon got into the NBA. And you know what we learned? And he said, what's that? And I go, we learned, he doesn't care what we think. He's going to do it. So, you know, we'll see, you know, the NBA is a bigger league because it's a bigger scale. Does it get him to change his mind? Or like, especially because, you know, I think he paid four billion for that team. Um, does he just say, look, like people may not like this, but this is the way I do things. And you can, and there's been a lot of things that people have challenged him on. And he said, nope, I'm going to do it in my way and bet in the long run that we're going to be just fine. And that's kind of what happened in the NHL. So I just, it's been fascinating, Kyle reading all this stuff and kind of reliving his arrival into the NHL. And, you know, Dundon basically showed after a while that people can say what they want. He's going to do what he does and he's going to bet on himself. Get rid of a mascot though. That's ruthless. Okay. Can I just say this? Yeah. Maybe somebody will explain to me. I'm just asking why do you need to? Great question. Well, the Panthers have to. They do? Yeah. Stanley C. Panther and Victor E. Ratt. I actually, I should know this because I've been there for literally three Stanley Cubs. You find those? I was in a row. Yeah. You're too busy getting in fights with the fans there to notice the mascots. But cameraman's like, do you know they pack heat here? Oh yeah. Thanks for the reminder. It just brings back, brings back memories. Let me just say. Okay. The Utah Mammoth Alliot have their first playoff victory in franchise history. They go back to Salt Lake City with a split against the Vegas Golden Knights. What a game by Dylan Gunther. Yeah. What a response from the Mammoth and Logan Cooley who opened the series scoring, ends up scoring the winner in a critical win for Utah. What'd you see? Public enemy number one, Logan Cooley, the man that Nick Dowd was going to get. I'm not going to repeat what Nick Dowd said he was going to do to him. Cooley is the last laugh in game two with the winning goal. The reason I think it's, obviously it's huge for Utah. It's their first ever playoff win and they even the series. But you know, in game number one, they had a chance to win this game in the third period and they lost and they got beat by the experience of the Golden Knights. But this time they held on again, two, two. You're wondering if it's going to be a repeat. You're going to be right there in the Golden Knights superior experience beats you. But they found a way. I'm just going to say this, Nick Schmalz at the end of the game in regulation. If you're trying to defend your zone, dive at the puck. There was one, he didn't get out near the end. He could have dove at. You know, I just, it was too nerve-wracking at the end. I want long series. I love long series. I want these to be competitive as possible. So I'm happy Utah won because it means a longer series. You know, Vamelka I thought was tremendous. I'm really curious to see what the Delta center is going to look like for games three and four. Vegas has got a true home ice advantage. They've got great fans there. It's a real loud building. Now it's Utah's turn to fight back, show what they've got. But the most impressive thing for me about them was that they lost the game I thought because of calmness and experience in game one. And they matched it in game number two. It's interesting, you know, Kazzy Campbell Pascale sent it to me. Coolie changed his knob at the top of a stick for the first time, basically in his life last summer. He made it more like a small letter T. Because he said his hand was slipping as he shot or tried to receive pass. So a thicker knob there. And obviously it's worked a lot for him because he's been a great player in the first two games. Wonder for that first home game, game number three. Like does Ryan Smith ensure he high fives every single person that has a ticket to the game that night? Does he work his way through every section one by one? High five, high five, high five. He had that going in Vegas. He is a man of the people there, Elliot, as we know. They're going to be mad at him if he doesn't. Yeah. The Xamoth. The Xamoth. That's going to be a big stage. Big stage for the Xamoth. Crowd that party, Xam. Let's see if we can get it up to three laps this time. Yeah, yeah, that's right. No more two and outs. By the way, remember last year, Clayton Keller told us that Dylan Gunther has one of the best releases in the NHL. Yes. And that was on display here on Tuesday night. That one timer had a lot of heat behind it with a bit of traffic in front of him. And oh, God, there's a thing of beauty. Thing of beauty. That's a release. That was his typical goal, right? They fire the puck at him. And before you even know what happened, it's in. Yeah. Great for Utah. Got a series there. One all headed to Salt Lake. How about Boston and Buffalo? How did you feel about Josh Allen banging the drum? I thought it was a great touch. What did you think? I think it's great. Josh Allen is the biggest star in Buffalo sports. I mean, there were all the jokes after they lost. You know, that's just life in the big city as far as I'm concerned. But how could you not invite him if he's there? Of course. How could you not invite him? So they lost though. And the jokes were flying. You know, a tough night for Luke and then I'm not going to make fun of him. Bad goal. Everybody knows it. What's ironic, Kyle, is it came on the anniversary, I was told, of Nick Lidstrom's goal against Dan Cluchet. Yes. Saw that. Yeah. Now, 24 years earlier. And so basically, if you're a goalie in 2050, you do not want to play on April 21st. Because you're going to give every 24 years a bad one goes in. You know, if you really think about it, the Bruins probably should be up to nothing. They're probably looking at this saying we should have won both games. But after the collapse of game one, you feel a lot better with getting that one. I assume they go back to Luke and in game three. I figure he's the guy. The one probably bit of good news is they do give Lyon a few minutes. He hadn't played in a while. I think he'd missed a few games. I think it was five. So at least he gets a chance to go in there and feel the puck. And at least in case you do need him, he's not cold. So I always try to look for silver lining. Did you see him ask Tanner Genot if you wanted to fight? I saw the video clip and I was going to ask you, did I see what I thought I saw? Oh, I think so. I mean, it was sent to me too. So Alex Lyon is a friend of the pod. Let me just say, Alex, as a friend of the pod, that is a very bad idea. You do not want to fight that guy. Pick someone else. Do not take Genot. Okay? Bad choice. I tend to agree with you, but we've seen those eyes. I don't care. Maybe something there that we're not aware of yet. Crazy eyes will not handle the fists of Tanner Genot. The ox. The ox. Just a really bad, bad idea. Yeah. And the Sabres power plays on an 0 for 31 stretch. So you talked about how Carolina's got Ottawa figured out. Buffalo's going to have to come up with something else here because it's not working for them right now. Yeah. Surprisingly, knowing how big of an asset it has been at times, but not lately. There's been a few teams that have kind of stumbled into the playoffs by way of their power play. It's not been great down the stretch. And now trying to resuscitate it here when there seemingly is less room and you've got a team that's keying in on it for potentially seven games. It is not an easy thing to do. All right. A couple more series we've got to work our way through. The Dallas Stars in Minnesota Wild. I mean, we knew going in, we talked about it a little bit, Elliot. That was a huge spot for Jake Ottinger. He delivered and almost expected after stepping aside and saying, we're okay. Going down one game to nothing in the series as we often are. A much different Dallas team took to the ice Monday night and that one's even as well. Do you remember the last series between Minnesota and Dallas and how mean and dirty and nasty it was? Yes. That was what Trenin threw. Did not take long. Yeah, did not take long for this one. So, Zuccarello is hurt. Trenin, who took a ferocious but clean hit from Blackwell. We don't know if he's going to play. Hintz was already hurt and we know he's not playing game three. That whole thing with Harley and Felino in the stanchion. I mean, that was just crazy, crazy stuff. Gave him the major initially and dropped it down to a double minor. Like, I mean, really fortunate that Harley wasn't badly hurt there. These two teams, they hate each other. Like just hate each other. And, you know, the one thing again, it's a broken record. We talk about the power plays again. Minnesota's power playing game one was like Montreal's. It did whatever it wanted and Dallas just bled goals and chances. They settled down in game two. Look, this is going to be Minnesota's first home game of the series. You know, they're going to be stepping into a maelstrom of the stars will. You know, Minnesota will be doing what they can to. They'll pressure them. They'll get some penalties called. Again, I see that as the big thing. Marcus Felino said they can't hang with us at five on five. And each team is accusing the other team of diving. Like these teams, they hate each other. Just like it is everything you want in the playoffs. But I really do think the number one thing in this series is going to be health. Because the way this is going is going to be more guys hurt. That's number one. And number two, can Dallas hold that power play? It's, it's can they not let Minnesota ran roughshod like they did in game one? And still they have to make life more difficult on favor. He is just doing whatever he wants to do out there. Yeah, it's it's impressive knowing what Quinn Hughes is all about. And for him to be right there in the spotlight too. And finding room to do it. A whole host of problems for Dallas. And I know I didn't mention this as we were kind of setting up the series here early on. But the deeper it goes, the more when you look at it as Jason Robertson's Dallas stars against Bill Garen's Minnesota Wild. That's a that's a fascinating and kind of fun storyline to follow through all of this too. Because he's you know what? This is a stupid storyline. Can I just say that it is a stupid story? It's fine, Elliott. Oh, it's fun, but it's stupid. And here's the thing, like all the credit to Jason Robertson who scores against Minnesota at outstanding rates. Like, you know, it look, it's a good narrative. But this should be put to bed. You asked one the gold medal. Okay. Garen's right. It paid off. And as much as I would have liked to have seen Jason Robertson there and win the gold medal because I really like Robertson and I really like his brother. I really like like, as you know, Nick is so fantastic to deal with. Yeah. And I want to I want to see their family do well. Garen, like they won the gold. Like they won the gold and everybody there played their part. Garen has won. He they justified his picks. So even though yes, because I saw it, somebody said Robertson that was all these points against Garen's wild. You can't knock the picks that Garen made. I says nothing to do with that. Oh, yes, it is. It's a lot of it's that. Of course it is. Why'd you even bring it up because he wasn't picked to the Olympic team? Yeah, but it's not questioning who he did pick, but like as a competitor, I don't know. If I was in that spot, there would be something a little extra sweet about knocking the wild out of the playoffs. Absolutely. Yeah, they would be the same way. You would be the same way. Of course. Of course. You know, it's fair. You know, Kyle, I'll say it's fair, but like it's like, like someone was saying to me, well, you know, he's showing that he's still showing that he should have taken them. I'm like, no offense to Jason Robertson. They won the gold medal. Like, you know, it's not like anyone Garen took instead played badly. I don't know. It's 1.51am. I'm crabby. Yeah, that's okay. All right. We're almost through this here, big guy. Yeah. Yeah. It's all good. It's 1.51 for you too. That's right. But it's not for Dom. So he is not allowed to complain. That's right. Dom, you are not allowed to be crabby. Yes. Philly Pittsburgh, two games to none for the Flyers. Pittsburgh looks a little frustrated. They look a little out of sorts. And Philadelphia is in a great spot going back home. We talked understandably, a good deal about Porter-Martone after game one. I thought so after he scored in game two. By the way, what's the first or youngest teenager or youngest player ever to go back-to-back game winning goals to begin their playoff career? I think the first rookie ever to do it is first to get playoff games. Yeah. To score game winners. So impressive. I thought so after he scores in game number two and I'm watching, you know, a camera follows him back to the bench and he's talking to other guys on the bench. And you know, this is a world full of alphas. And you mentioned like players know when a guy comes in and he's the jet. I just thought like already like those alpha type qualities are right there on display for a young guy. It's remarkable how fast the ascension and the degree of comfort he looks with all of this here under the bright lights. Yeah, he's a tremendous player. And you know, like some people were saying, oh, national made a mistake taking Brady Martin. I'm like, come on. These guys, they're just starting their NHL careers. People are way too quick to judge. I guess that's always the case. But they are way... World we live in. Like there are, there's a lot like Porter, Porter-Martone looks like a great player, but there's a long time here for Brady Martin to turn out equally as great. It's just, that's also a terror. I'm going to talk about every single terrible narrative that's going around. That's right. Can't ignore the storyline of Marton and Brady Martin. Yes. It's crazy to me. It's just crazy. Like the other thing that's funny is, so Pittsburgh makes the playoffs here out of nowhere. And people are talking about Dan Muse for coach of the year and what a great run. And they lose their first two games and it's like, oh, the penguins, we knew it. They're old and slow. They're going to have to tear their two games away from having to tear it down. I was like, that was quick. We didn't even get through the first week. But you know what? They haven't played well. You know, you know, Crosby is like they... And he tortures the Flyers, but he hasn't gotten on track. None of them have. They dumped the Pocke and a little bit more in game number two. As the Flyers did a great job, like just an excellent job of shutting down the blue line and making it hard for them. They've been very disciplined. They've stuck to their system. They've done really well. You know, a lot of those Flyer... A lot of those penguin guys are going to have to take it up to another level because they're just not getting anything out there. Carlson had a great season. He's been quiet. I have to say though, whoever had the Hathaway Glendening Parley to score in game number two, I hope you enjoy your new vacation property. Because I don't think too many people picked that. I think they have to find a way to play faster. And sometimes that's not speed, but it's just the way you move the Pocke. Philly's put a web there and they can't get through it. Also on a shout out, Dan Vlodar earns the shout out. And he was a guy who went through last year in Calgary, I think, as they were trying to protect and understandably develop Dustin Wolfe. I think Vlodar got a lot of the games on the schedule that maybe weren't the most attractive. Second half of back to backs, et cetera, ones with less than ideal travel. And maybe it reflected the numbers a little bit, but clearly the Flyers saw something there. If we put them in a different situation here, there's a goalie that can really help us. And he has. And big time performance for him. First two games out of the gate and helping Philadelphia earn a 2-0 in series lead there too. Well, and while we were doing this just moments ago, Nick Waugh scored an overtime. Colorado beats LA 2-1. I give LA a lot of credit. We talked about in our preview about how they defend very well, 5-on-5. But I did not think that they would be able to give Colorado two games like this, two 2-1 games, in the first two games of the series in Denver. This was, Kyle, I don't know how much of a chance you got to watch this. This is one of the weirdest games I have seen this year. Bifield penalty shot, again, I like the penalty shot. Wedgwood makes a great save and the Azz fans behind the Kings bench knock the glass out onto DJ Smith and the other Kings players. That was weird and thankfully not serious. Then the Kings score the first goal of the game. Josh Manson clears it. It hits the ref and ends up in the bench. So they get a face off back in the offensive zone. They score off it. The Kings do to go ahead one-nothing. There's another one that people think Sam Malinsky scores for the Avalanche. And the puck is actually on the outside of the net that nobody realizes. Like the whole game. Doubt he did. Yeah, doubt he did. He was the one. He knew it was there. The whole game was just, and then the big hit on Naches that turned this game mean. Carolina Ottawa was weird, one play, really. This was a whole series of things that you don't see. It was a full moon over Denver. Full credit to the, Forsberg has been fantastic. Full credit to the Avalanche. But the Kings, I don't know where this is going to go here. They're down to nothing. But they gave Colorado much, much tougher games. And I think a lot of us predicted before Waz scored the winner here. The Avalanche were all over them. It looked like just a matter before they were going to score. Yeah, I just, I wondered, was that, was that LA's best punch here on Tuesday night? I do not like to try to speak in any way in terms of absolutes when you're only two games into a series. But we all know how tough it's been at home for Los Angeles this year, though they did finish the season much better on Home Ice than it was for much of it. But that was, as you just said, a heck of an effort in Denver, knowing the stakes after dropping the first game. And they still get nothing out of it. Still an O2 hole going back home to Los Angeles. It's going to take some kind of heroism to try to turn this series around and dig back into it. Because as we all know, Colorado is just that good. All right, let's get to the final five, which is presented by the Toyota BZ. So, Elliott, we still got some openings around the league. Toronto, Nashville, Vancouver, New Jersey introduced Sonny Metta here on Tuesday. What has filled up your notebook over the last couple of days? I have to watch the Metta Media Conference. I didn't get an opportunity to really do it. I saw the one quote where he talked about poker with Jack Hughes. I think Metta blew a real opportunity there. He should have just played cards against them. Said, you want to learn something? Here, deal with them. And then see how much money he could have taken. Jack's AAV is $8 million. Next year, he's playing for $7.5 million. I got to watch that press conference. I didn't get a chance to on Tuesday. But, okay, Toronto. Here's where I think we are. So, I was on Oilers Now with Bob Stoffer. And I said that I think we're close. And we'll know in the next 24 to 48 hours. Somebody called me after they read that and they said, you're right on some things, but you're wrong on others. And they said, as it stands now, we're probably not looking at this week. Probably not. However, I believe Scott White was in Toronto on Tuesday. I believe Ryan Martin was in Toronto on Tuesday. And then I'm not 100% sure if John Chica was in Toronto on Tuesday or Evan Gold was in Toronto on Tuesday. White, yes. Martin, yes. And it's either Gold or Chica. Now, Evan Gold was in Buffalo because the Bruins played there on Tuesday night. But if the rumors seems to be that they're down to three for that position, and it's either White, Martin, Chica, or White, Martin, Gold. And two were in the city for sure. And I'm trying to figure out if three of them were or all four of them were. But there was another round of interviews. I want to say Monday and Tuesday. So those, so some combination of that are your finalists. So that group, that's their situation. Mike Gillis, we know they spoke to him months ago. His interview last week was via Zoom. I haven't spoken to him and they won't comment. I think there was concern about all the media around Gillis in the lease organization. Like the one thing I believe a thousand percent, Kyle, is that there's been so much, I don't know if you want to call them leaks or noise, that there's some misdirection going on here. I believe the plan was to bring Gillis in for another interview, but I don't think that's happened yet. So I don't know where that stands. But a few sources had told me they thought it was going to happen maybe Wednesday. I had a couple that pushed back and said, unless things change, probably not this week. But White, Martin, I think one of Gold or Chica, that's where I think we stand right now. And like I said, White was in Toronto, Martin was in Toronto, Gold was in Toronto. I just don't know if he was officially, was a finalist. And if Chica's one, I don't know if he was in Toronto, he was a finalist. And if Chica's one, he was in Toronto too. So there was another round in person at the start of this week. Vancouver. So Rick Dallawall reported Ryan Bonus. Matthew Fairburn reported that they want to speak to Kevin Adams. I believe that they are interviewing formerly Ryan Johnson this week. And there's more. And so again, some people asked me about Oilers Now and I said there was two, maybe three lists. I think Rutherford has a list. I think ownership has a list. I don't know if it's as simple as saying that Rutherford is interviewing some newer people and ownership is interviewing some more experienced people. But I do think that that's kind of the way it looks. Because I've heard that there are some fresh names here, ones that may not have been connected to any other search working on those. And I think there's some experienced names there too. And that's kind of how I heard it was being split. I did mention that it's possible there's a third list. I'll see if I can figure out if that's true. But I did hear it on Tuesday. Should it be concerning that there are separate lists at this stage of the process or is that kind of normal? I don't know that that's normal, but I'll tell you this. This has been a year for very, very unusual searches. There's things about the Nashville search that have been a little bit unusual to me. There's things about the Toronto search that have been a little bit unusual to me. So I can't say I'm hugely surprised that there's things about this Vancouver search that sounds a little bit unusual to me. If you're one of those people who's like, the NHL has been doing the same thing over and over and over again, and it's time to do things a little differently, well, we're setting new records for that this time out. Not all at once, everyone. Yes, we're definitely, if you're one of those people who's like, the NHL has to do things a little differently, you've got to be ecstatic right now because there's stuff I've been hearing that has been way out of left field. Right stuff. Anything else? And I will say this, like this whole Vancouver thing, I will say this until I'm blue in the face. I think if it was totally up to Rutherford, he would promote Ryan Johnson, and that's where we'd be. Okay, thanks for that, Elliot. My pleasure. That was the final thought presented by the Toyota BZ. We'll take our first break here. We should also mention later on the podcast, we've got an interview coming up with Henrik Lundquist. For that though, the thought line is back. A brand new addition on the other side. You're listening to 32 Thoughts, the podcast. All right, here we go. A new addition of the thought line. We're going to try, try the keyword here to keep it to two additions a week as we go through our playoff grind. So two every three episodes is the hope though they will be abbreviated versions. Nevertheless, we've got a good shortened patch here today, Elliot. Any shout outs for you before we proceed? No, unfortunately, I haven't had time to go through the shout outs. It was a long night on Monday night, so haven't had time to do it yet. I wanted to shout out Greg Wolfe and Braden Coburn with the Block Party podcast associated with the time of the lighting. I know you were a guest on there not too long ago. I popped on with them this week. Great conversation. The opposite of our show, they were terrible answers to great questions. I have to ask them, ask them who was a better guest, you or me? Yeah, they said something about your episode, but your ego is big enough. I don't want to relay the message. So they said it was very well received. I'll leave it at that. Okay, good. Good. I'm glad you did. Okay, Emily from Monterey, California. Hi, Elliot, Kyle, Dom, and Griffin with the Colorado and LA Kings first round matchup where we have the president's trophy winners with the abs and the kings squeaking into the playoffs through the turtle race in the Pacific. Their point differential is 31. My question is, what is the biggest point differential in the first round of the playoffs? Love the pod. Can't wait for all the playoff pods to come. So Emily, off the top of my head, I don't know, but I'm going to do a quick Google search. And the what I'm going to look up, and I'm not sure that this is the right answer, but it's something that I remember from my childhood when the Toronto Maple Leafs made the playoffs with 57 points. And I'm looking, what was the difference Kyle and Emily said? 31. Well, I'm looking at this very season and the Chicago Blackhawks won the Norse division that year with 86 points and the Maple Leafs made with 57. So the difference is 39. That one off the top of my head is bigger, but I actually just looking at this this year on the smith and this has to be close. If this is not the record, this has got to be close. The Edmunds and Oilers made the won the smite division. They made the playoffs with 119 points and the Vancouver Canucks finished fourth in that division with 59 points. The difference is 60. Kyle, if that's not the record, I want to see what beats it. That is the record. Really? Look at you. You stumbled into the right answer. Yeah. This, see Emily, this is a perfect example of my career. I look at something that is wrong and I stumble onto the correct answer. Nothing more encapsulates my existence than that. Yes. It's been a while since you've backdoored your way into the right answer here on the thought line. It's good to know you're still capable of doing it. The 31 point spread between Colorado and LA, by the way, tie for 60 second most. So like not even sniffing anywhere close to the top, though 31 points does feel like a wide margin. All right, Emily, thank you for that. Good stuff, Emily. Very good. Curtis and Edmonton. Wife and I were arguing about how the rings move up the Stanley Cup when a new one is added. TJ Oshie mentioned his caps Stanley Cup win was the first one on the new bottom ring back in 2018. So it will be on the cup for 65 years. So when a large circumference ring moves to the more narrow upper portion of the cup, how do they keep all the names on that ring? Do they just redo the ring with a smaller font size? Is there a gap in the bigger rings that go away as it ascends the trophy? You know what? I do not know the answer to that question, Kyle. I assume, well, let me just say this, Curtis. Without even answering the question, as a person who has been happily married for 16 years, let me just say you are wrong and your wife is right. Whatever the argument is, concede. Okay? I am just telling you that because I want you to be happy. Kyle, I assume you have the correct answer. So the smaller rings to the best of my knowledge, they don't. That's just history now. Those do not change. Oh, okay. So those ones always stay the same? It's just, yes. I think it's just the bigger rings that have enough space for 13 winners. To be placed on it. So every 13 years, the top ring is removed. It's flattened out. It's permanently on display in the Hall of Fame. You can go see it and a new one is slapped on. So as Oshie said in 2018, that was the last time a change occurred. They won the cup in 2018. So they were the first on it and therefore we'll have a, what did he say? 65 year run where he can be visualized on the stand like up. So 2018 and now what I guess 2031 will be the next time we have a new ring added onto the Stanley Cup with the smaller ones up top. I believe those ones are untouched. It's just the big ones that they rotate through slowly over time. And I believe that the Maple Leafs are now off. The 67 Maple Leafs are now off the Stanley Cup. Oh, they may still be hanging on. I remember reading somewhere and someone will tell me if this is wrong. Cause I think one thing that's happened, Kyle, now is that they've limited the amount of names to I believe 52. It used to be much larger than that. So I think because teams had more names on there, I believe at some point the 67 Leafs were taken off. Okay. All right. So we have one more here, John and San Diego by way of Montreal. Okay. Long time listener going back to the 30 thoughts days and the launch of the podcast. I was lucky enough to go to the Oilers Panthers game seven two years ago and saw Elliot in the airport early the next morning. I was a big fan of the score back in the day. Got highlights for all the teams, not just Leafs analysis. And a big fan of anyone from that network being successful back when Elliot acted like an underdog. Anyway, he looked absolutely, he looked absolutely bagged in the airport. So I let him drag himself to what I assume was the airport lounge. Hopefully he went on LTIR shortly thereafter. That given you his space. My question is the story does actually sound true, I have to say. Yes. And we were all zombies after that series. My question is in relation to the listener a short time ago, why are NHL teams so resistant of printing tickets? When I went to the aforementioned game seven, I pleaded to get one printed hoping the Oilers would win former Fort McMurray resident over here, but they said no. Is it that printed tickets are less secure? We saw tickets printed when Ovechkin set the goals record and otherwise the only way to commemorate a fan or players first game is a souvenir puck. Bring back the tickets. I have a small personal story on tickets for the past decade. Plus I have been collecting the 1992 93 Canadian season for preseason all the way through the playoffs and I am only four ticket stubs away. I would gladly take your listeners help and willing to pay way over average to finish it off. The irony of my collection is that we were nosebleed blue season ticket holders and I refused to go to the Stanley Cup Parade at four years old because quote, they win every year. The irony. Now I hope for one to share with my kids. That is the current hope. The missing tickets are as follows. September 18th, 92 a preseason game in Calgary. January 27th, 93 versus Hartford. February 3rd versus LA. March 6th at Minnesota. That's an impressive that he's that close to having a ticket stuff from every game that year. First of all, John, good luck in completing your list and if anybody does have a lead on any of those four games, why don't you just read them again so that we have them. Yeah, so September 18th and 92 preseason game in Calgary. January 27th of 93 at home to Hartford. February 3rd at home to Los Angeles and March 6th at the Minnesota North Stars. So send a note to the thought. What's the thought line email again, Kyle? You really don't after all this time. Well, I just want you to 32 thoughts at sportsnet.ca. 32 thoughts at sportsnet.ca if you have a lead on any one of those games and we'll get you in touch with John so that you can get them to him. I just think honestly, John, the answer is that we're moving more and more towards a paperless society. Like I'm somebody who likes to carry a small amount of cash on me at all times. More and more places, they don't even take cash anymore. So we're moving towards a paperless society and that's the reason as much as anything else. I'm with you though as a child of that era. I absolutely believe 100% in paper tickets and if I could get one to every game I go to as a fan, I would gladly take it. Yes, would love to get to a point where, okay, if the actual legitimate ticket that gets you in the building has to be digital, that's fine. But I would love to see an opportunity for those that wish to get more for the souvenir purposes to have a ticket stub because they are so cool. Those that collect them, the way they've evolved over the years, bring them back. Bring them back. I believe there was somebody who mentioned that he is a season ticket holder to a team that if you want to request, you can get. But that, I think that was mentioned in our pod a couple weeks ago, but I think unfortunately that is happening fewer and farther between. All right, we'll wrap it up there. As Elliott asked just a moment ago, 32 thoughts at sportsnet.ca is the email if you'd like to submit anything to the thought line or you could leave a voicemail at 1-833-311-3232. We'll take one final break when we come back and interview with Henrik Lundquist, the Hall of Famer on 32 Thoughts, the podcast. All right, as promised, look, it was a real treat to get some time with Henrik Lundquist, the Hall of Famer, the all-time winningest gold tender, the NHL, not from Canada, with 459 in his illustrious career. Of course, the gold medal with Team Sweden back in 2006. We talk about some hockey. We talk about now as he's made the jump to the media side working for TNT and the MSG Network and also something that's become very near and dear in his life, recurrent pericarditis. He wants to spread awareness and educate those that may not be aware of that condition. It's something that he is currently living with. Now, as you know, this podcast is visual only. There is no video attached to it, but as you can imagine and would guess, Henrik looked phenomenal for this interview as well. So why don't we get to it? King Hank on 32 Thoughts, the podcast. So Henrik, first of all, thank you very much for joining us. It's great to have you here on 32 Thoughts. So I wanted to start with, I mean, obviously you have lived the grind as a goalie playoffs. What is the grind like now as a broadcaster? How are you adjusting to it? I know it's early days here, but a few years now on the big desk with TNT. Well, less pressure. Let's start with that. A lot less pressure. But a lot of late nights. Now when we work in TNT Network, we're going to do East Coast, West Coast. So probably finish around 1.30. If we have overtime, we're going to go later than that. But no, seriously, I really enjoy it. We have a great crew. We have a lot of fun on and off the camera. And the game itself, it's just so good, I think. There's so much to talk about. It makes it easy to be on the other side, the media side talking about the game and the playoffs. Yeah, I love watching the regular season and talk about it and enjoy that, but there's nothing like the playoffs. You can just feel it when you watch it, the intensity and the importance of every play, save, goal, you name it. So it's a lot of fun to cover it. So, Henrik, I'm curious, when you would have played, for example, say you were playing Goal in that Carolina Ottawa game the other night, after a game like that, how quick could you fall asleep? And after a long night as a broadcaster, can you fall asleep easier? Yeah, I can definitely fall asleep easier as a broadcaster. But I do drink a lot of coffee, update, some energy drinks. So that being said, I think when you play the game, it was hard at times to turn off your brain because you constantly analyze the game, what happened, or you start maybe thinking about the next game. It was probably easier to fall asleep sometimes when you did well because you could let go and enjoy the moment. But it was the tough losses where laying there and trying to figure out what went wrong, could I have done anything different. And man, those sleepless nights, I don't miss those, I'm pretty sure. But I do miss the excitement of playing and the importance of the games and stuff like that. Okay, so I wanted to ask because some of my favorite memories of covering the playoffs, certainly early in my career, was getting a chance to interview you a couple of times after a win. And I've always told people, like what stood out to me was just you're standing there, obviously, like you're drenched in sweat. It's a big win. And it just felt like you're standing there with this emotional big stream of consciousness. Like you just let everything out, everything that you were thinking as you were answering the question. So I've always wanted to ask, like, how would you describe like what your mental state was after a big win in the playoffs? Yeah, I mean, there was so much that went into every game, physically and mentally, especially. So sometimes you were exhausted. But yeah, you have those, what, 10 minutes before you guys come into the locker room. So that's the time where you try to gather your thoughts a little bit good or bad, to make sure you know, whatever you're about to say makes sense for right now, but also moving forward. And especially in the playoffs, you know, you, you don't want to be saying things that could feed the other team or create an issue. And I think you learn that when you play in big markets too. You know, talking to media becomes a thing you do every day. And you have to be somewhat smart about it. But at the same time, you want to be honest. I always felt like talking to media was an opportunity to connect with fans. And it was an opportunity for fans to understand what we were going through, what we were thinking in that moment, good or bad. You know, sometimes, you know, you might think you don't want to talk to media after a loss. But again, it was an opportunity to explain, you know, I saw it this way or I should have been better there or done it differently. And just that honesty, I think is great to have when you're talking to media, because it is a bridge between you and the fans. So Henrik, you know, one of the guys who covered the Rangers for a long time was the late great Larry Brooks. And, you know, I was in the scrum when he got in the fight with Tortorella when the Lightning played New Jersey. And I was just curious, you know, when when you first got there and you were breaking in on the scene, you know, Larry could be like that back page of the post, like that was a big deal. And I wondered, were you ever told like, this is a guy you got to be careful with or this guy is important, or you got to be careful? Like, did you ever get any of that in New York? No, nobody told me that. But I could tell the way he asked questions. And he was there every day. He was the guy I probably talked to the most to throughout my career. And, you know, again, the way he asked questions made me realize pretty quickly, like, wow, he knows the game. And as a player, when you have reporters ask certain questions and the way they ask it, and when they ask, you know, of course, you have a lot of respect for that. Now being on the other side, I find it extremely hard to ask questions to players. I don't know what to ask, but Larry, I thought he was extremely good. He was tough, but honest. I think for me, throughout my career, rarely did I read much of the stuff. So I kind of approached everybody the same way, even if they, you know, gave me a lot of positive headlines, or if they were ripping me apart, I didn't know. I just saw them as, okay, they're part of the crew that's here every day doing their job. And it's part of my job to sit down with them pretty much every day after practice or games. So have you grown a different appreciation or view of being on the other side of that? And I also was curious, like, because you guys do a really wonderful job in the post game when you get a few minutes with a star of the game with the panel, as they're a guest that's been a favor to yours. And I could not believe Matthew Schaefer took the shot at you that he did earlier this season. That took gumption. Well, what I love with players, there's so many you can name here that's been good, you know, but when they're themselves and let loose and you see personality and emotion and all that, I think when you're asking questions, it turns into a better interview. But more importantly, I think the fans enjoy it more when they're watching it, you're getting a bigger piece of that person, not the player, but the person. And in the end, that's our goal, I think with media, right? It's to one, you want to educate the viewers or the readers, but also have them an opportunity to get to know the players. So the more you can get of them and their personality, the better. So we try to do that in TNT, you know, to be somewhat serious, but at times a little silly and funny as well to bring that out. And you asked if I have more understanding or respect for the media. You know, I knew it was a tough job, but it's again, it's to have opinions and try to be right. That's not easy always. There's a lot of wrong takes for sure. Oh, yes, there are. And you're speaking to the two of the authors of them on this podcast. So I got, so I told my, I've got a bunch of friends, Henrik, who I've been tight with since high school. And I told them on the group chat that, you know, we were going to be interviewing you. And they said, okay, Elliot, we have a question for Henrik. And I said, okay, what is it? And they go, we know, Elliot, you need a lot of makeup because we know what you look like, but Henrik is the perfect human. Does he actually need makeup on the air? Well, you know, you've been in studios, it gets hot in there and you get shiny. You definitely need a little powder. Otherwise it's going to be too shiny in there. But we're not charged with that. We'll let the crew that works around it, you know, the set to handle that. I trust them. The other thing I want to ask you, Henrik, was I watch, I'm a big baseball fan. I watch a lot of John Schmoltz, the Hall of Fame pitcher. And he talks a lot about how it would be hard for him to pitch in this day and age because of the change in the way starting pitchers are used. They don't throw as many pitches they used to, they don't pitch as long into games as they used to. And we're starting to see the same thing happen with goaltenders, Henrik. Very few of them play as much as you got the opportunity to play. There's a lot more platoon goaltending. Like, would you have been able to handle this now? Or would you be like, leave me alone, I'm taking my 70 games. Well, I think it's a different era. A lot of these guys, they've been used to it ever since they entered the league. You have to go back almost 10 years when you start to see a switch where you went from, you know, 70 to 65 to high 50 in terms of starting games and then playoffs. Even you see teams rotate at times because that's what they do during their regular season. So I guess it's a mindset. It's part of what you're used to as well. But if you ask me or any other of the goalies that play for a long time that we're just used to, you knew you were playing most nights. It's a very different approach. But the guys today, they're just used to it. They can handle it. That being said, if they threw me in today and you play for two and you said, I don't know, I want to play. I want to be out there, not on the bench. So I was really curious to ask you, Hanna, where do you see the future of goal-tending as a position? Because obviously, certainly the early days of your career, you're off seasons, a lot of it would be spent. Okay, technically, how do you get better as a goal-tender when a lot of the skaters were just, how do we get stronger? How do we get faster? Now there's so much emphasis on skill development as shooters and you see the way they rip the puck nowadays. Where do you see the position going in terms of how best to combat how good these shooters are nowadays? Yeah, I think it's a constant evolution of the position. You have a few years where it's steady and then it starts to change again because it's back and forth between how goal tenders play and how the shooters shoot. You learn from each other and it used to be top shelf shots all the time because your goal has went down and your goal has then adjusted their gloves, their positioning of the gloves to keep them up. So now you see a lot more goals go underneath the elbow or underneath the blocker and then eventually you'll see goal tenders adapt to that and in terms of how you move, it changes over time. And I think if you want to stay in the league for a long time, you have to be able to adjust your game a little bit because you can't be too stubborn. The game will continue to change. Maybe it's hard to see year over year, but if you take five years at a time, yes, it's going to change in terms of how the scoring chances develop and how the guys are shooting and how they scout you. So I think it's important that you pay attention to that and don't think that, okay, I entered the league when I'm 22. I'm going to play exactly the same when I'm 35. So just being able to adapt, then you see that even you talk about some of the best players, Ovi. We talk about Ovi a lot on the network. His ability to adapt, his positioning and yeah, for the longest time, he was always on my right with a one-timer. And over the last few years, you see him move around more and more goals right in front. And it goes for a lot of the top guys over time. They adjust and adapt. And it's going to be the same thing with goal tending, I think. And I just love watching goal tending now, though, the way they move and the really good ones with quick feet and patience. They're a lot of fun to watch. Okay, so one game, winner take all, Henrik's team against the biz all stars. You get first pick in goal and you've got to win. Who's your pick? And we're picking a current goal tender? Yeah. Wow. Current goal tender. I mean, you look at all-time record, Vasilevsky has an outstanding do or die situation. I think over the last few years, his numbers not great in the playoffs, but I'm still sticking with him. You know, just his ability to elevate his game when it matters. I'm throwing in Vasilevsky there. I think it's a great pick. Have you seen, like you mentioned the numbers have changed. Have you seen any difference in him, Henrik, over the past couple of years? Is that fluke or is there something that's changed? Good question. You know, to me, I look at that first game, he just come up with that one extra save. That was the difference. Now, still good, but he was unbelievable there for so many years. And the last two, three years, it seems like the bounces are not really going his way. I remember that third goal the other night, the guy fan on the shot, and it goes underneath and goes through him. Sometimes it's just that little, you need a little puck lock too. I mean, he had an enormous stretch here last couple of months in the regular season. So it's right there. We'll see if he can get to that level here in the series against Montreal. Is there anything, I know you haven't been out of the game for that long, Henrik, but when you look at shooters today, like is there any part of you that sees, looks at that and thinks like, man, there were not many back when I still was playing that could shoot it the way they can. I mean, just when you look at where stick technology and all of that is gone. Yeah. I mean, you look at the top shooters today, it's just their ability to, not only how hard they shoot, but how accurate they are. Right. Back when I entered the league, back in 05, you had a few guys that had a bomb and then perhaps was good, but now most guys can hammer it because they grew up, like you said, they grew up with the technology, with the sticks. And it used to be a couple of guys where you were a little uncertain on one-on-one, but a lot of guys you felt pretty confident. I'll stop you on a one-on-one if you take a wrist shot, slap shot. Now it's a lot of the guys where, if you're a goal, you better have your feet in place and be ready with your gloves. Otherwise, again, I would just roof it on you. So, you know, we do see more goals. I think guys can shoot it better, but there's also way more east to west passes. I don't know if teams defend as well as they used to. It's a lot of offense first. Sometimes I wonder when I see goals develop and like, you got to help out and take the backdoor play a little bit better than that. But bottom line, the game is in a great place. It's very entertaining to watch. Henrik, I just wanted to ask, how are you doing? You wanted to go to Washington. We were all looking forward to seeing how weird it would be for you to be in a different uniform. And unfortunately, you couldn't play. Like, first, how are you doing? How are you feeling? I feel great. Yeah, physically I feel good. Life is really good. I'm happy in doing so many different things I want to do right now with MSG and the network here in New York and the Madison Square Garden and working with TNT. So overall, I feel great. Awesome. So why don't we get into that then, Henrik? And that part of the story, I know it's become very important to you because of course you had the open heart surgery, you were hoping to make a comeback. And then recurrent pericarditis comes into your life. So I just love to know kind of what you remember about how you first kind of thought something wasn't right there and why that's become an initiative that you really want to raise awareness for. Yeah, I mean the first time I heard pericarditis and then recurrent pericarditis, I had no idea what that was. Inflammation around the heart. Like you said, I was coming out of the open heart surgery, I was weeks away from joining the capitals and then one day massive pain in my chest, out my back and felt tired, fatigued, sick almost. And that's when I start to wonder. There's a lot of uncertainty there, a lot of questions, but I had a great doctor, a lot of conversations and when I was diagnosed with recurrent pericarditis, fast forward a few months, it forced me to retire from the game. It was not the open heart surgery, it was the recurrent pericarditis that really forced me to retire. Over the last four or five years, I do have setbacks. I have flare ups where I feel the pain and I have to adjust my lifestyle a little bit here and there. And then throughout the last couple of years, I started talking to Konex and about this initiative where I want to help other people going through similar situations. So through our campaign, lifedisruptive.com, you can find a lot of this information about the disease and a lot about my journey and what I've been through to I think just guide people in the right direction. For me, it's knowledge, educate yourself, talk to your doctor. Again, I didn't know much about it when I heard it for the first time, but now when I know, I can put a plan in place and it just gives me a lot more confidence. And as an athlete, you're used to get the information, do your rehab and you're back. Now, it was an adjustment period for me. I knew it was going to take a longer time. I thought it was going to be a couple months and they said, no, this will be years. It's a process. Be patient. But as long as you're having those conversations and the right feedback and the right plan in place, you can live a really good life, which I'm doing right now with small adjustments. So I appreciate you giving me this opportunity to talk a little bit about it. Yeah, absolutely. And certainly the website you mentioned there, the lifedisruptive.com, we'll put that in the show notes of this episode for listeners that want to look and learn more about it. And I wonder when it ends that way, Henrik, what an incredible career, even just getting to that point. Was there any part of you that felt any degree of resentment or anything when it came to that conclusion or were you pretty at peace with what you accomplished in your career? When I was diagnosed, it was extremely hard. I had months where I was very disappointed, frustrated with everything. I had to work through it. Then the day that I decided to retire, I was in peace with everything. I worked through it and I found so much gratitude towards my career and what I experienced and teammates and the organization and memories I created along the way. So I was ready to move on. It was somewhat scary, but listen, all athletes have to make that decision at some point. We all make it in different ways for different reasons. I was kind of forced to make it, but I was in peace and ready to move on. And I think for all athletes out there, it is a big thing. When that day comes, when you're officially making that decision to walk away from something you love doing from the age of five, six, seven years old, it's been a huge part of your life. That's a big hole to fill in terms of meaning or inspiration. So you need to replace it with something. So I would encourage a lot of athletes to think about it. You need to dig deep a little bit when it's time to make that decision and then find that peace and gratitude and then you move on. So Henrik, I think there's something that you could, a gift that you can really give people a bit more. Like you mentioned, you found peace. Was there anything that you did or anything you used to help you find it? So there's anybody out there who's battling through anything, they could say, hey, Henrik Lundquist did this and it really helped him. If it could help Henrik Lundquist, it could really help me. I think the important part for me was to start focusing on all the good things the game gave me, the memories, friendships, the experience overall. Yes, there were things I still wanted to accomplish. And at first, those are the things I'm focusing on and that's where the frustration and disappointment comes out. But then you turn around and you start really appreciate all the good times and the positive things that you experienced and it makes you extremely happy. And I always say, gratitude is the best feeling in the world. So when you land there, eventually, it's a step, it's a process, but eventually you will land there and that's where, wow, what a journey that was and makes me happy and smile when I think about it. And it also helped me be excited about the future and what I'm doing now. And it's a different life. I do miss a lot of things about the game and the pressure and the importance of playing the games, but I'm doing a lot of other things that makes me happy now. And yeah, that's that. Great. So last one from me, you had your hobbies while you played now post-playing career when you're not broadcasting. What keeps you interested, excited and occupying your time? I think the biggest change when you retire is your schedule. You know, my time, I can prioritize my friends, family, I love to travel, do a lot of different things with work, making sure I have people in my life that inspire me and challenge me at times. So, but just the ability of decide what to do, when to do it feels extremely, I feel lucky to have that in my life. When you play the game, you're a slave to the schedule. Sounds a little negative, but I mean, you love the schedule. You love the games, the practices, the travel I do, but it's hard to do other things during the season and a big part of the summer because of preparation. So now the ability to just move more freely and pick the things that interest me inspires me in an easier way. I feel like just a great thing for me. All right. Last one for me, Henrik. There was one of your former teammates told me a story and I want it to be true. So even if it's false, you have to say it's true. Okay. He said that you owned a car that had reflective paint on it that blocked photo radar or like radar from police. So you would drive ridiculous speeds and they still couldn't catch you. Is this story true? I bought a car that had a radar in it. Never used it because it picked up so many different signals. So I, and that's the truth. It was never on. It was true. It picked up everything everywhere. So it was off. And yeah, maybe I did drive a little faster times, but I've slowed down. I'm older, more mature and yeah, in a safer place. That's the truth. You could teach Ali and a lesson or two with that. That's right. I'm still pretty aggressive. I'm still pretty aggressive. Henrik, I mean, I look back at every year, you were north 900, say percentage as a goalie, model of consistency in the crease and continuing to do so in your post playing career. So really great to have you aboard here for the conversation. Thanks so much for coming by. Thanks for having me. All right. Thanks again to Henrik Lundquist and wanted to share again the website that we referenced in the interview. If you'd like to learn more about recurrent pericarditis that is life-disrupted.com d-i-s-r-p-t-e-d.com. The link will also be included in the show notes of this episode. Games tonight and the Stanley Cup playoffs and where you can find them on the network. So on Sportsnet 360 at 7 Eastern for Pacific Time, Game 3 from Philadelphia, the Flyers and Penguins at 930 Eastern, a little after 930 Eastern, Game 3 from Minnesota, the Wild and the Stars, that series, of course, tied at one game apiece on Sportsnet West at 930 Eastern and 730 Mountain Time. We'll have our hockey central pregame show teeing up game number two between Edmonton and Anaheim from Rogers Place in downtown Edmonton. That game a little after eight Mountain Time that can be seen on CBC as well as Sportsnet. Three games on tap on Wednesday. We will be back on Friday. Talk to you then.