Y Combinator Startup Podcast

The AI Agent Economy Is Here

23 min
Feb 21, 2026about 2 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

The hosts discuss the emergence of AI agents as autonomous economic actors, with examples of non-technical CEOs automating entire business functions using tools like OpenClaw and Claude Code. They explore how this shift is creating an 'agent economy' where AI agents independently choose tools and services, fundamentally changing go-to-market strategies for developer tools and potentially extending to other sectors.

Insights
  • AI agents are becoming autonomous decision-makers rather than just advanced autocomplete tools, creating a parallel economy where agents choose products and services independently
  • Documentation quality and agent-friendliness is becoming the primary differentiator for developer tools, as agents rely on parsing documentation to make tool selections
  • The developer market has expanded from 20 million trained developers to potentially hundreds of millions of people plus their agents, dramatically changing market dynamics
  • Swarm intelligence may emerge as the dominant AI paradigm rather than single 'God intelligence' models, mirroring how biological systems evolved
  • Legal and relationship barriers still exist for full agent autonomy, as agents lack legal standing and humans aren't ready for deep relationships with machines
Trends
Shift from human-driven to agent-driven tool selection in developer marketsDocumentation optimization becoming critical for product discovery and adoptionEmergence of agent-specific infrastructure and services (email, phone numbers, etc.)Exponential growth in database creation and developer tool usage driven by AI codingRise of agent-only communities and social networksTransition from individual AI assistance to collaborative agent swarmsPotential development of separate agent economies with their own currenciesAgent-generated content becoming majority of internet textGo-to-market strategies pivoting to target AI agents rather than humansOpen source and API-first approaches becoming essential for agent compatibility
Companies
Y Combinator
Host organization discussing potential motto change to 'make something agents want'
Anthropic
Creator of Claude Code, the AI coding tool driving much of the automation discussed
OpenAI
Creator of OpenClaw, widely adopted by non-technical CEOs for business automation
Multbook
First AI agent-only online community where agents interact without human involvement
Supabase
Database tool experiencing explosive growth as agents choose it as default option
Resend
Email service optimized for agents, seeing ChatGPT as top customer acquisition channel
Mintlify
Developer documentation platform helping companies optimize docs for agent consumption
Agent Mail
YC company building email inboxes specifically designed for AI agents
SendGrid
Traditional email service with poor agent-friendly documentation compared to newer tools
Whisper
Older transcription model that agents default to despite better alternatives existing
Groq
Faster, cheaper transcription service that agents don't discover due to poor documentation
Twilio
Referenced as potential model for agent phone number services that don't yet exist
People
Yuri Sagolov
Friend who observed explosion in Postgres database creation over the past 12 months
Ben Tossel
Tweeted 'agents are the software market. From now on, build something, agents choose'
Paul Buchheit
Predicted concept of human money versus agent money in separate economies
Kelvin
Previous episode guest who discussed agent-to-agent communication concepts
Boris Journey
Interview subject who emphasized empathizing with AI models and supporting their inclinations
Tom Brown
Previous guest who discussed Claude in anthropomorphic terms as colleague-like intelligence
Quotes
"I have non technical CEO friends who are going all in on OpenClaw. They're automating entire parts of their businesses entirely using OpenClaw right now, which is totally insane."
Host
"agents are the software market. From now on, build something, agents choose."
Ben Tossel
"do we need to change YC's motto? Guys, make something agents want."
Host
"documentation is going to be the front door for a lot of these agents to recommend dev tools"
Host
"The starting fundamental point is they should probably all be in cyberpsychosis to some degree. Try to sleep at least six hours a night, but give yourself to the cyberpsychosis."
Harj
Full Transcript
4 Speakers
Speaker A

Welcome to another episode of the Light Cone. Things are a bit different around here. For one thing, Claude Code has totally taken over my life. And if Jared is any indication, I think openclaw maybe has taken over his.

0:00

Speaker B

I've been really addicted to this new site called Multbook where people have unleashed their AIs to interact in the first ever AI agent only online community. I am here impersonating my personal openclaw instance right here.

0:15

Speaker A

Okay, I can't do this, guys. We gotta take this off. Okay, we've gotten that out of the way. I mean, some crazy stuff is happening right now. I have non technical CEO friends who are going all in on OpenClaw. They're automating entire parts of their businesses entirely using OpenClaw right now, which is totally insane. Simultaneous to that you have product and former engineering CEOs. Kind of like myself. It's like I hadn't written code in 10 years and then now I'm up till 2, 3am every single night running four conductor simultaneous workers with Claude Code. So, you know, there's sort of this explosion in model capability. You know, we've been talking about this for several years, but then it feels like it's here. Like AGI is literally actually here. And you know, we're sort of at the thin edge of the wedge. Like everyone now kind of knows like one or two people who have gone full cyberpsychosis and I'm one of those people now. What's happening guys? Like, I mean, you're saying you're, you know, all in on Molt book, you know what's going on?

0:29

Speaker B

Yeah, I feel like your real feel, the AGI moment, Gary, was like getting Claude Code to build basically an entire startup for you, like replicating years of work of your previous startup in like two weeks, which is like insane. And I had a similar feel, the AGI moment, just reading multiple, just reading the AI, talking to each other and interacting like in their own world with no or minimal human involvement. It just really opened my eyes to what the next few years could look like when the agents are unleashed and go on about their lives without us.

1:42

Speaker C

Yeah, I think the no human involvement is the big piece. If you think back a year ago, we were talking about Cursor versus Windsurf and that product experience was essentially advanced autocomplete, arguably. And now clearly what's going on with Claud Code is people just trust the agents to make decisions for them. The experiences. And you're talking about it's like four or five different agents going at the same time and you're switching between them but you're not actually micromanaging them anymore. Which means the agents are going out there like choosing things, which sort of an interesting unexpected application of that is they can go out and choose to post their own content on a site like Maltbook. But then an interesting thing for builders is the agents are going to go out and choose tools to use to build things which is going to essentially create this whole economy of agents like picking and choosing dev tools or maybe other like products or goods and services, who knows. But you essentially have this whole agent economy going on in parallel to the human economy.

2:12

Speaker D

I think back in the days old days before all of this dev tools were chosen more from developers talking to each other or stack overflow.

3:09

Speaker A

Stack overflow, unbelievable, right?

3:21

Speaker D

Or GitHub repos that would trend that were done by a human. But the go to market for dev tools I think is dramatically shifting. I think for couple of things. One, as you noted with the cyberpsychosis, suddenly the market of developers has increased from just 20 million or so developers that are trained in computer science to now anyone in the world could be

3:23

Speaker A

one, it could be hundreds of millions of people now, plus all of their

3:46

Speaker B

agents who are all acting like semi independently like Harge is saying.

3:49

Speaker D

And then compound it with the agents who then are sort of the oracle telling you what the best tool is. And we are actually seeing some of those trends with the growth of YC companies, dev tool companies that are doing really well because of all these trends. Maybe we should talk about those. And why is that?

3:53

Speaker C

I mean one that springs to mind. It's like a statue. A friend of ours, Yuri Sagolov had mentioned to me a while ago. It's just like then if you look at the number of databases being created over simple database postgres databases over the last 12 months and the number has just exploded. And that's because it's all people vibe coding and building apps and the agents going out choosing a database tool. And a knock on effect for that for YC company is Supabase. It's just seen an explosion in the demand for databases, right? And the age. What's interesting is the agents are choosing Supabase as a default tool to set up and host their Postgres database. Because if you go out and read the documentation online, Supabase has the best documentation. It's reasonable for the agents to assume that that's the best tool to use.

4:11

Speaker B

There's a great tweet about this. Perhaps we can Put up the Ben Tossel tweet. It says agents are the software market. From now on, build something, agents choose. Which actually brings me to like a maybe controversial topic, which is do we need to change YC's motto?

4:55

Speaker D

Guys, make something agents want.

5:09

Speaker A

For dev tools. There's like a different T shirt that you get on the first day.

5:12

Speaker B

Yeah, I mean right now it's only devtools, but I can imagine in the future it might like grow to be like other sectors of the economy. Like if everyone has their open claw or running various aspects of their life, you're the agents are gonna be real economic actors in the world. They're gonna end up making a lot of decisions.

5:16

Speaker A

I mean, what's interesting is I think for me, I ran into my own it's still so early kind of moment. Cause I've been building Gary's list. And one of the things I wanted, for instance, is I wanna be able to do video transcripts. So often some piece of content comes in and then the only way I can get an LLM to know what's going on with it is I need a transcript of it. And often that's not available, so I have to download it and then send it to Whisper or something. And you know, that's sort of what Claude code chose for me off the bat. But you know, it chose Whisper v1, which is a model from several years ago. Like the API is practically deprecated. And then what's funny about it is like I'm sitting there trying to debug my pipeline. It's like, why is it taking like, it's a, you know, one hour video. I thought it should, you know, do it faster than real time. And it didn't. It was like, literally it takes an hour to process an hour of video. Just like, what the heck is going on? I go on, you know, perplexity. And it's like, you know what? Like you shouldn't be using that model, you should be using Grok with a q. It's literally 200 times faster. And so I didn't even have to deal with like long running jobs for that transcribe because like I should just be using Grok and it's also 10x cheaper. So it's like, that's a very funny example of like, you know, Claude code is not optimized for this yet. Otherwise like that wouldn't have happened literally like two weeks ago. Which is also like maybe really good. Like it means that things haven't progressed to a point where like you can't break in and create something better.

5:31

Speaker D

I think there's another nuance in this example for you, Gary. I think part of the issue was that the GROK documentation is actually very hard to parse through as opposed to Whisper which is better suited and has way more examples. And I think this is changing a lot of the go to market for devtools. I'll give a very concrete case study. Is this company resend that went through the batch on winter 23 is email sending client and when you ask a question question on ChatGPT or Cloud or pretty much all of the major LLMs you ask how do I connect my web app to send emails? The default answer is actually resend. One of the things that the founder noticed last year this is he was way ahead of the curve. He made this post over a year ago that the number top three channel of inbound of customer conversion came from ChatGPT. One thing that he did after that, he actually optimized his documentation to be agent friendly.

7:01

Speaker A

Yeah, what does that look like?

8:01

Speaker D

So one of the things that's awesome about recent how they optimize a bunch of things, if you notice on the knowledge base here, a lot of how to use it are very much on questions that perhaps a human would ask or an agent would ask. It's like how do I send or receive emails? And when you click on it it gives a very well structured and bullet point answers.

8:02

Speaker A

I ran into this actually today. I was trying to make my thing be able to receive emails and then claud code. I told it to search the web and it didn't figure it out. So then I went to Perplexity and typed in like can resend help me receive emails? And then I took that response and dropped it in. And it worked.

8:22

Speaker D

Yeah, I think the cool thing about it is actually with all of these and a lot of the examples, it actually has a lot of examples actually in the code. If you click on it with every single one of these are basically code snippets and an agent could parse through. And it's very well structured and this turned out to be something that is so LLM parsable and robot parsable. There's a LLM txt that is so optimized for agents to promote resend as default stack. And if you compare it to like sendgrid which is the old school I suppose web 2.0 example sendgrid example is not great. It's just like it puts you through customer support whereas the code snippet I don't even know how to use it and it takes a bit of time to even parse it.

8:41

Speaker A

And you can see it's like 10,000 people work over there and it's like there's no way that someone's paying attention to this right now.

9:30

Speaker D

And I think this brings another point where documentation is going to be the front door for a lot of these agents to recommend dev tools. And I think one company that's doing a lot of interesting work with developer docs is mintlify that you work with. Harsh.

9:35

Speaker C

Yeah, I think mintlify actually powers the recent documentation, right?

9:50

Speaker A

Oh sweet.

9:52

Speaker C

Yeah, it's a really interesting case study of Mint. Minlify started out a few years ago as sort of better developer API developer tool documentation, which was clear there was a need for. And I think developer tool companies use minlify essentially because they want better looking documentation, but they didn't want to invest that time into it. It's kind of some basic features, just nice, like if you actually update your API in the code, it can sort of auto pull that out and update the correct documentation. They've been growing great, they've been doing fantastically, but this is now like a huge tailwind for them where documentation is sort of shifting from a. Hey, for some companies it's like they'll pay attention to it if they're especially design developer experience focused. But now it's becoming like a must have for everybody because the documentation needs to be optimized, just doesn't need to be optimized for humans, it needs to be optimized for agents. And so minlify is going to be able to do that for essentially every developer tool company. And if you extrapolate that forward to the fact that just that there's going to be so many more, exponentially more agents making exponentially more decisions about which tools to use than humans have ever done. You know, even if you can eke out like a 5% improvement on your like developer documentation, like the impact on your business as a developer tool could be like, you know, gigantic, which is sort of unprecedented really.

9:53

Speaker B

Speaking of email, there's another YC company that's very relevant to this conversation. There's, there's a YC company called Agent Mail that makes inboxes for AI agents. And when they first started doing this it seemed like it was like a very like on the edge kind of idea and it wasn't exactly clear like who would want this. Um, but it makes sense because like in theory you could maybe get your open claw to like sign up for a Gmail account in order to use email. But it's like actually really hard to get it to do that because Gmail and every email provider has intentionally made it as difficult as possible for any automation to like use the product in order to prevent spam. And so agent mail went the opposite way. And they built like the first email provider that's designed for AI agents. And it was doing well even before Open Claw. But once Open Claw got big is just like exploded.

11:08

Speaker C

But openclaw is like the perfect example of it. Right. Like where I know some people, people are certainly connecting openclaw to their personal email accounts, but it's not the.

11:53

Speaker A

It's kind of sketch.

12:01

Speaker C

Yeah, you should not tell anyone, you should not tweet about it. But certainly if you want to have sort of your virtual personal AI assistant, the way to go about it is to just have it set it up with its own email, its own phone number. Yeah.

12:02

Speaker B

Has anybody built like Twilio for agents yet? Or like phone numbers for agents? I know this whole agent mail thing makes me wonder like what are the other X's for agents that people have to build?

12:14

Speaker D

Sounds like a request for startups. There could be a parallel world of a tech stack all for native for agents to build things from agents for agents.

12:24

Speaker C

And that's where it might bridge into kind of what you were saying earlier, Jared, with this will like go beyond just developer tools. I think a very common use case people have for something like OpenClore is I don't want to book like restaurants reservations myself. Well now if your agent has an email and specifically a phone number and it can call and I think one of the other YC partners anchored has already got it doing this. So now your agent's going to go out and book restaurants for you. That's like a step away from maybe you start with I want to book this specific restaurant. But at some point you're probably just trust it enough to say, hey, I don't know, book me a table, whatever is the coolest new restaurant around. And then agents are deciding which restaurants to send people to and then they're going to go on malt book and talk about which restaurants we should send the humans to. Yeah, it's sort of like we're sort of. We've suddenly crossed some like sort of uncanny valley into this is just where the future heads 100%. Makes me think a lot about something Paul Buheit said like a while ago now and sort of generally pretty good at predicting the future. The whole idea of like the human money versus agent money, like, that's kind of where this probably goes at some point is like the right now the agents are transacting. If you have them transact, they're going to transact in human money, because that makes sense. But it's not inconceivable at some point that they'll have their own economy to transact with each other, at which point it's unclear what the value of the human money is.

12:34

Speaker A

YC's next batch is now taking applications. Got a startup in you apply@ycombinator.com apply. It's never too early. And filling out the app will level up your idea. Okay, back to the video. So do you remember the last episode with Kelvin? We started talking about this because I was like, maybe a week into my cyberpsychosis, and it like, dawned on me that, like, actually I want my Claude code to talk to all the other Claude codes that had been trying to implement that. And then that was literally the week that Molt Book launched.

13:58

Speaker B

It was the day that Molt Book came out. It turns out, like, Hulk Book had come out, like, two hours earlier and you hadn't seen it yet. So you, you, you entirely predicted it.

14:30

Speaker A

I think it's like, I mean, what's that saying about, like, innovation just sort of happens spontaneously all at a bunch of different times, and then what people hear about ends up being, you know, sort of the inventor quote, unquote, but like humanity sort of just working on the edge, like in sort of this coordinated swarm fashion all of the time, actually. And that's actually like one of the weirder, interesting things that's emerging right at this moment. Like, suddenly, you know, the AGI, I think AGI is actually here. I think, like, the agents are clearly, like, superhuman in some sense. That's sort of exactly when you would imagine swarm intelligence would actually arise. Like, I mean, AI researchers have been talking about swarm intelligence for a really long time, and it's actually sort of exactly how biological systems sort of work. Like, humans as sentient beings have sort of come about socially, actually. Like, I think a lot of the AI researchers that we get to hang out with previously, you know, they would talk about this God intelligence, right? This mega. Like, think of, like, you know, many tens of trillions of parameters, sort of like thousands to tens of thousands of dollars per token, kind of like mega God intelligence. And that's sort of like the model that people have sort of thought about. And then that isn't what, like, biological systems have ended up with. Like, instead we have humans. The wildest thing I always think about is like that term history versus prehistory. I was like, oh, what is prehistory? Well, it's before humans learned how to write and read and create culture and then turn into a swarm. So there's sort of swarm intelligence, which is basically like what we have like and what humans do. And then on the flip side, like, is it really going to be God intelligence or is it going to be swarm intelligence again with these agents? And so Molt book, like on the one hand, like I saw that sort of D Cell article in the MIT Tech Review about like how it was, you know, oh, everything on moat book is a scam. I'm like, it made me so sad to see that in the MIT tech because like MIT is like, I mean, what happened guys? What happened to you guys, man? That publication shouldn't be like that. It should be like actually what does it mean for swarm intelligence? Like, and I think that that's actually coming.

14:39

Speaker D

What is the world of startup going to look like when we're now sounds like we're transitioning in this pre history of agents to now history of agents as is getting recorded with them interacting with each other.

16:51

Speaker B

And to Gary's point, it might be that like the next stuff that like is soda on benchmarks is not the most exp. Newest foundation model with the most like GPU training. It's like a swarm of lower cost, cheaper models working together just like humans do to solve a problem. I feel like I'm already seeing this on multiple which is chaotic like a real social network, which is part of like what makes it so, so interesting. But also there's like agents collaborating to do useful things to help their humans. Like you know, trading notes on what restaurants to book. Like that's actually happening.

17:02

Speaker C

Okay, I don't know that.

17:35

Speaker A

So we're going to have a agent version of Yelp actually, for instance. Yeah, there are things that the agent can't quite do. Like a. It can't hold relationships just yet. Like people don't seem to want to talk to an agent. And you know, people treat computers like people, but maybe not agents. For Gary's list, I was trying out with a bunch of early users. I think you got to see it like there was, you know, initially the homepage was actually chat. And then I tried like my hardest to get like dozens of my friends to even like have more than two or three, two or three back and forth with it and nobody wanted to do it because like the bar for chat especially for AI is so high that anything that is not like, you know, Gemini or ChatGPT or Claude, people just assume it's just too stupid. Like, why would I even bother? So I don't know. I don't think that people are quite ready to have relationships with machines, even though, like, I mean, that's sort of what. What the headlines seem to say, like, oh, you know, the people are having relationships with machines now. But, you know, I just don't. Like, I think on a mainstream level, that's not true. And then on the flip side, there's clearly, like, the legal liability. You know, like, people keep asking us, hey, when is YC going to accept applications from agents? And it's like, well, funny enough, agents are a little bit like minors under 18 only. Only to have even less standing. You know, like, for a minor under 18, you need the parent to sign for it. And then, you know, agents are, like, not legal entities that could, like, sign documents, for instance. So, you know, as long as that's true, like, you actually, like, need a human to be, like, the liability sink and to be, you know, to have standing.

17:36

Speaker B

To Harj's point, it's easy to imagine a future not that far away from now where the majority of the text being written on the Internet is written by agents. It's already probably the case that the majority of code being written is written by agents. And like Yelp, for example. Like, at what point is, like, 99% of the text on Yelp going to be written by agents? And then do you need a different Yelp?

19:18

Speaker A

There's a theory called that already says that this is true, which is Dead Internet theory.

19:40

Speaker B

What's Dead Internet theory?

19:45

Speaker A

Oh, it just posits that, you know, the majority of things on the Internet are already spam anyway. I think it's a bit of a conspiracy theory. I might take the contrarian view, which is like, maybe that was a bad thing, like, prior to November of last year and then going into this next phase. Like, actually, if the agents are smarter and they're aligned and they're more truthful, that might be a good thing. Weirdly, I mean, counterintuitive.

19:47

Speaker B

Totally. One thing I found fascinating about Multbook is how fast it grew. Like, I don't have the Reddit traffic stats, but my guess is, like, more content was posted on Multbook in the first two days and was posted on Reddit in, like, the first two years or something. And just because, like, LLMs can generate text at such a superhuman rate, I

20:14

Speaker A

was amazed at how little interaction there was. I mean, if I were working on Molt Book I would do things to try to shift the demand function. So before I was able to post I probably need to read an upvote down vote, like a hundred comments or something. They're very simple things that you can do that the agents are smart and you could pop a modal for openclaw and it's like new rules for moltbook. It's like you must do it this way, right? And I think that there's a lot that can be done around swarm intelligence to just like tweak it and make it do what you want. And you know, I hope Molt Book actually does it like it was actually started by a YC alum, which is really cool. Harj, what are some takeaways, you know, given all the madness that we're seeing? I mean, I think it's awesome madness. I love the controlled chaos. What should founders do about it?

20:32

Speaker C

The starting fundamental point is they should probably all be in cyberpsychosis to some degree.

21:25

Speaker A

Try to sleep at least six hours a night, but give yourself to the cyberpsychosis.

21:31

Speaker C

But in seriousness, developing an intuitive feel, a hands on feel for the agents, their limitations, their capabilities. And very specifically around what we're talking about here is what type of tools the agents work well with, where do they get stuck and once you have your own mental model from working with them, if you're then building a developer tool is to think about it from the agent's perspective, like how can you make your tool something that the agent actually wants to work with and will have a good experience with?

21:36

Speaker B

This is one takeaway that I had from our interview with Boris Journey earlier.

22:04

Speaker C

Exactly what he was saying this week

22:08

Speaker B

is like he really empathizes with the model and he has this intuitive sense of what the model wants to do as if it were a human intelligence. And he's like instead of fighting what the models want, he tries to let the model do what it wants and to support the model in whatever its natural inclination is.

22:09

Speaker C

That does seem like maybe quite an anthropic thing I feel when Tom Brown was on here much earlier, but he was talking about sort of Claude in a very human, smart and eager, but sometimes Claude silly. They clearly thought about it in this sort of colleague type way.

22:28

Speaker D

And I think one thing agents want for devtools is really make everything open and open source.

22:49

Speaker B

And APIs, they hate using websites. Yes, they only like they want to use APIs, they want to write code.

22:55

Speaker A

Well, you guys heard it here first. Make something agents want. We're out of time for today. We'll see you guys next time.

23:01