SHOCKING GOP Plan to Fund War with Health Care Cuts
91 min
•Mar 31, 20262 months agoSummary
Pod Save America hosts discuss Trump's contradictory messaging on Iran negotiations amid an escalating military conflict, the severe global economic fallout from the war, Republican plans to fund the war through healthcare cuts, and the DHS shutdown stalemate. The episode also features an interview with Iowa Democratic Senate candidate Josh Turek about his path from Paralympic athlete to politician.
Insights
- Trump's public claims of diplomatic progress with Iran appear designed to manage market volatility rather than reflect actual negotiations, creating dangerous short-term thinking that could trigger escalation
- The economic consequences of the Iran conflict are far worse than markets currently price in, with global supply chain disruptions in energy, fertilizer, and semiconductors likely to persist for years
- Republican attempts to fund the war through Medicaid/Medicare cuts represent a politically catastrophic messaging strategy that could accelerate erosion of Trump's base support
- Young MAGA voters are significantly more skeptical of the Iran war than older supporters, suggesting a generational fracture in Trump's coalition that polls may not yet fully capture
- Iowa represents a genuinely competitive Senate pickup opportunity for Democrats due to structural economic decline, farm crisis, and healthcare failures creating cross-party voter dissatisfaction
Trends
Generational divide in Republican support for military interventionism, with digital-native younger conservatives rejecting cable news consensus on foreign policyGlobal recession risk from Middle East conflict spillovers, with energy and fertilizer supply shocks creating multi-year economic headwinds independent of ceasefire timingErosion of Trump's approval floor below 40% with strong approval collapsing to 22%, suggesting hardening of opposition rather than soft disapprovalRural voter realignment driven by farm crisis and healthcare facility closures, with betrayal narrative replacing 2016 populist enthusiasmMarket inefficiency in pricing geopolitical risk, with oil prices and equity valuations disconnected from actual supply chain damage and recession probabilityHealthcare system failures becoming salient political issue across demographic groups, particularly cancer rates and insurance denial practices in agricultural statesCongressional dysfunction on budget reconciliation creating leverage for minority factions, making supplemental spending increasingly difficult to pass
Topics
Iran Military Conflict and Escalation RiskTrump Administration Diplomatic StrategyGlobal Energy Supply Chain DisruptionHealthcare Funding and Medicaid CutsFarm Crisis and Agricultural EconomicsDHS Shutdown and Congressional GridlockTrump Approval Rating DeclineRepublican Primary Fractures on Foreign PolicyIowa Senate Race and Democratic OpportunityTariff Impact on FarmersCancer Rates and Water Quality in Agricultural StatesFertilizer Shortage and Food SecurityBudget Reconciliation ProcessDisability Representation in GovernmentGenerational Political Realignment
Companies
SimpliSafe
Home security system sponsor offering active guard outdoor protection and anti-theft guarantee
Shopify
E-commerce platform sponsor enabling online business sales with templates and AI tools
BetterHelp
Online therapy platform sponsor connecting users with licensed therapists for mental health support
Hims
Telehealth provider sponsor offering online access to ED treatment and other personalized medications
PolicyGenius
Insurance marketplace sponsor helping compare life insurance quotes from top providers
ActBlue
Democratic fundraising platform providing tools for campaigns to raise money and organize supporters
People
Josh Turek
Paralympic athlete and Iowa state representative running for U.S. Senate in open seat race
Jon Favreau
Co-host of Pod Save America discussing Iran war and political implications
Jon Lovett
Co-host of Pod Save America analyzing Trump's negotiation strategy and market dynamics
Donald Trump
Subject of discussion regarding Iran war strategy, ballroom construction, and approval ratings
Marco Rubio
Administration official discussing Iran conflict objectives and ground troop deployment decisions
Caroline Levitt
Spokesperson defending administration's Iran negotiation claims and threatening previous leaders
Christine Lagarde
ECB leader warning that economic shock from Iran war is beyond current understanding
Tom Harkin
30-year Iowa senator and father of Americans with Disabilities Act, political hero to Turek
Ann Coulter
Conservative critic of Fox News coverage of Iran war, expressing skepticism of Trump's strategy
Marjorie Taylor Greene
MAGA representative criticizing Fox News for brainwashing viewers on Iran war coverage
Gavin Newsom
Target of Trump attacks for having dyslexia, used as example of Trump's bullying behavior
Rob Sand
Iowa gubernatorial candidate running in open race alongside Turek's Senate campaign
Zach Walls
Turek's primary opponent in Iowa Democratic Senate primary, June 2nd election
Mike Johnson
House Speaker rejecting Senate's unanimous DHS funding bill, protecting Trump and hardliners
Susan Collins
Maine Republican expected to oppose healthcare cuts to fund Iran war supplemental
Rand Paul
Kentucky Republican expected to oppose healthcare cuts and deficit spending for war
Lisa Murkowski
Alaska Republican expressing skepticism of healthcare cuts to fund Iran war
Nate Silver
Election analyst tracking Trump's approval rating decline to 39.7% with negative 17.4 net approval
Greg Bovino
Former Minneapolis Border Patrol chief attempting to retain 850K social media followers after removal
Quotes
"You never know with Iran because we negotiate with them and then we always have to blow them up."
Donald Trump•Air Force One interview
"The world is in turmoil over the energy crisis. The situation is so serious that it has even kept me up at night."
South Korea President•Recent statement
"One message was repeated over and over. The world still hasn't grasped the severity of the situation."
Bloomberg reporting on economist consensus•Economic analysis
"We are facing a real shock that is probably beyond what we can imagine at the moment."
Christine Lagarde, ECB President•Interview with The Economist
"I represent the reddest district that is represented by a Democrat that was won on election day."
Josh Turek•Campaign interview
Full Transcript
Pods of America is brought to you by SimpliSafe Home Security. Right now, you're listening to us. Maybe you have headphones on, maybe you're at the gym, maybe you're driving, you're locked in. If your security camera sends you an alert right now, are you going to see it right away? Probably not. Passive security relies on you paying attention. Real security works even when you're listening to Love It Rant. Traditional security systems only act after someone who's already broken in. That's too late. SimpliSafe's active guard outdoor protection can help prevent break-ins before they happen. while other security companies lock you in. SimpliSafe comes with no long-term contracts. They earn your trust every day by keeping you safe and satisfied. They're so confident in the protection they provide. They even back it with an anti-theft guarantee. SimpliSafe protects over 4 million people. They have 20 years of experience in home security. They were just named best home security system of 2026 by US News and World Report. And here's John Lovett right here. I set up a SimpliSafe home security system. Incredibly easy to do. Once it was set up, boom, secure. Good app. Good customer support. Good. Just good. We love it. Right now, our listeners can get 50% off their new SimpliSafe system at simplisafe.com slash crooked. That's simplisafe.com slash crooked. There's no safe like SimpliSafe. Starting a business can be overwhelming. You're juggling multiple roles, designer, marketer, logistics manager, all while bringing your vision to life. Shopify helps millions of business sell online. Build fast with templates and AI descriptions and photos, inventory and shipping. Sign up for your 1 euro per month trial and start selling today at shopify.nl. That's shopify.nl. It's time to see what you can accomplish with Shopify by your side. Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Jon Lovett. Tommy's off this week. I think he's with his friend Lindsay at Disney World. Yeah, Lindsay was saying that he wanted to go to Epcot and get the UK and France to take over Morocco. I don't know what that was about. I love the countries at Epcot. All right. On today's show, we'll talk about how Trump is touting diplomatic progress with Iran by threatening the country with war crimes. Why most experts think we're all underestimating the economic disaster that's coming and Republicans new plan to pay for the war by cutting your health care. We'll also talk about the new fight between House and Senate Republicans that's keeping the Department of Homeland Security shut down while Congress takes a two week vacation. and of course the critical work of building Trump's ballroom is about to begin even though no one wants it and the design makes no sense then you'll hear Tommy's interview with Iowa Senate candidate Josh Turek quick reminder please consider becoming a Crooked Media subscriber if you haven't already so that you don't miss out on any of the great content we're putting out for our friends of the pod subscribers get our new extra episode of Pod Save America called Pod Save America Only Friends other subscriber only shows like Polar Coaster with Dan Pfeiffer access to all of our excellent sub-stack newsletters like Pod Save America open tabs, ad-free episodes of all your favorite Crooked pods, and you get to feel good about supporting one of the few independent, proudly pro-democracy media outlets left in Trump's America. So head to crooked.com slash friends and subscribe. All right, let's get to the news. We are now entering the second month of Donald Trump's brief excursion in Iran. 50,000 Americans are now deployed in the Middle East. More than 8,700 people have died. Tens of thousands are wounded. Millions have been displaced. Iran still controls the Strait of Hormuz, which has led to the worst oil shock in history and a global economic crisis that's getting worse by the day. President keeps trying to calm the markets by claiming that there's been, quote, great progress in direct negotiations with Iran while simultaneously threatening to destroy the entire country's access to electricity and water, which would be a war crime, and something you definitely say when you're on the verge of a diplomatic breakthrough. On Sunday night, after multiple reports that Trump is nearing a decision on sending in ground troops to take control of the and or remove nuclear material from inside Iran, the president talked to reporters on Air Force One about the fateful choice that's weighing heavily on his mind. I did something today. I just got these in from the architects. A lot of people are talking about how beautiful the ballroom is for. Here's another view. This is coming from right opposite the Treasury Building. Beautiful capital. Beautiful building. One of the, I think it will be the finest ballroom of its kind anywhere in the world. A lot of people are giving it really good reviews. Some are giving it reviews without even seeing the building. Just like we're ahead of schedule on the ballroom, in a much bigger way, we're ahead of schedule with Iran. Doing extremely well in that negotiation. Are you fucking kidding me? You never know with Iran because we negotiate with them and then we always have to blow them up. I think we'll make a deal with them, pretty sure. Whether it's possible or we won't. I think we've had regime change. We can't do much better than that. The regime that was really bad, really evil was the first one that was done. The second was appointed, and they're gone. They're all dead. Other than one who may have a little life. And then they're really in the third group. And the third group of people that seem to be much more reasonable. It truly is regime change. He really did it. He did the State of the Union segue that we always joke about between domestic and foreign policy, except it was, and as we are ahead of schedule on the ballroom, so are we ahead of schedule in Iran. It's actually a great metaphor, I think, but maybe we can save that for the ballroom section of the show. Unbelievable. It's an unbelievable, unbelievable. All right, I got the war going on, the oil shock, there's this DHS shutdown. I got to go back to the press and the plane and Air Force One and just talk to them. I'm going to take some questions. So I got some pictures of the ballroom. That's how he starts. Sorry, guys. I can't focus on the war today. I also got a board meeting at the Kennedy Center I'm late to. So Lovett, what are your theories about why Trump seems so eager to allege progress in negotiations that no one else has been able to confirm are even happening? So I actually think it does make sense. So what's happening? He is signaling to markets that the conflict won't escalate with the hopes that that reduces the volatility of the markets. That allows also those who support the conflict to say those who are afraid that it's spiraling out of control, that Trump is actually being quite reasonable. And then when he says the regime's already been changed, the new guys are so reasonable, they're easy to work with. He's suggesting that while maybe in the past they've used negotiation as a cover to murder everyone in the room or do strikes on Iran, that is a new group of people. And you can take my word that you can you can trust what I'm saying now because I genuinely want someone in Iran I can work with. The other side. You mean that you mean he's sending that signal to Iran? Yeah. And the other side of it, though, is Trump is trying to kind of put an asbestos blanket on the fire he started in the markets. That is not just because he wants the consequences of the ongoing conflict to have less of an impact on the U.S. He wants to increase his leverage over Iran. The less pain we're experiencing, the more leverage he has in the conflict, which frees him up to escalate, which suggests that escalation won't be as big of a price for the U.S. to pay. And when he says that we're already negotiating, Iran knows whether that's true or not, that that's Trump telling the world that if it falls apart, Iran is to blame. So it's Trump is trying to lower the cost of what happens if he decides to escalate. That that to me is like. But the only way that makes sense is if Trump is someone who only thinks short term and and discounts the cost of everyone thinking he's a liar in the future. But that's what he does. Trump is only a rational actor in the very short term. And so I think that's how you kind of can make sense of the threats of escalation and the promise of negotiation. Yeah, I was thinking about this. So if you're Donald Trump and you have decided privately that you have painted yourself into a corner and that you're kind of fucked and need to get out of this war and you're looking for an off-ramp, what are your options for how to communicate that publicly? Because it's, I mean, no president would really want to do this, but especially Trump, you're not going to be like, I really want a deal. You're not going to be like, come to the table. So you have to act like everything is going wonderfully and they're the ones who are begging for a deal. And you also bet that no one's going to believe them because they're the Iranian regime. So if they contradict you, then who cares? And so part of this, I think, is to just say like, yeah, we've dominated them so severely that they are just begging for a deal and things are going well while, like you said, communicating, I guess, to Iran that you actually do want some negotiations. And we should just know, like, yeah, could there be secret negotiations happening here and there? Like, maybe. But, you know, Pakistan has offered to host the negotiations. They already hosted some countries. The United States and Iran were not there. No representatives were there. The Iranian foreign ministry said today that like there's been no talks directly with the United States since the 28th, since February 28th, and that there won't be any talks until the military campaign ends. Also, The New York Times said this piece, too, that it is unclear who's in charge. And this is like according to Western and American intelligence officials. And so they don't really know who they're negotiating with or who has the authority to make decisions in Iran right now, though I You notice this from intelligence officials in the piece, too. It says, what's more, officials say hardliners within Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have become more influential, exerting more power than the religious leadership nominally in charge. So not a great sign that the IRGC, who are the, you know, the most hardline hardliners in the whole country are the ones in charge right now. Yeah, we also just everyone involved in this is a egomaniac liar. So it's just like impossible because it's hard to know what's really happening because they're also negotiating in public. Right. Like we know some of the states, the terms of the negotiation, tolls in the Strait of Hormuz, uranium enrichment, what have you. Right. Like they we've. Yeah. But like that's a good example of what Iran has asked for and what the United States wants in their 15 fucking point plan. They're so far. They're not even negotiating over the same thing. Like like Iran's like, yeah, we don't we don't want any more. We don't want U.S. military bases anywhere in the Middle East. Yeah, everyone's. Yeah, it's not. I just think they're I don't know how they even get kind of close right now. Well, it's like a game of chicken, except we've already rammed the cars into each other. It's like I don't know what are you just yelling at each other across two blown airbags? It's fuck it. It's really it's really bad. I mean, Trump also gave an interview to the Financial Times where he said, quote, maybe we take Carg Island. Maybe we don't. And, quote, to be honest with you, my favorite thing is to get the oil in Iran. But some stupid people back in the U.S. say, why are you doing that? But they're stupid people. That's a great quote. He's also claiming that Iran's parliamentary speaker has been allowing a few oil tankers through the strait as a, quote, tribute and a sign of respect to the United States. though that same parliamentary speaker is moving forward in parliament with a plan to institute a permanent toll for all ships passing through Hormuz and then blocking Israel and the United States completely. The speaker also said, now this is, remember, this is the hottest option. This is the new guy that Trump has said that they're probably negotiating with. He also said that Iranian forces are, quote, waiting for U.S. ground troops to enter the country so they can, quote, set them on fire. Does he seem like someone looking for an off ramp? So just trying to see the other side of this, take the same incentives in reverse. Iran has to say that the U.S. and global markets will pay a very high price for the conflict continuing, that Iran will endure a long-term conflict and Trump's threats of escalation are not effective leverage. And you would do this while underplaying negotiations, while signaling with actions that you actually do prefer a deal. Because for the same reason Trump wants to claim negotiations are ongoing in case he escalates. Iran wants to say there are no negotiations so they can blame Trump if he does decide to go after Karg Island. So I think it is totally possible we are ramping up towards boots on the ground in Iran. Right. We have Trump threatening it. We have Trump moving troops into the region while at the same time you have Rubio saying he doesn't believe troops on the ground are necessary. Right. That's what we're getting on the record. The problem with all of this is both assurances to the market and threats that you don't act on. Right. Those both have a clock. Right. Like if the assurances stop working, suddenly Iran's leverage goes up. Right. What does Trump do to respond? Does he cave? Does he take a great blow to his personal ego to end the conflict in a way that seems like it redounds to Iran's benefit? Or does he have to reset the clock by doing something escalatory? Right. Like that, that's where, that's what makes us all so dangerous because Trump only thinks one or two days ahead. And so that, that to me is what makes all of this so alarming. You can see your way to some, like, look, you're right. They're so far apart. We have no idea what the actual contours of a negotiation would look like. But the truth is both Iran and the United States would benefit from the conflict ending. That is like the undergirding truth of this entire war that never should have been fought in the first place. But that can often be true while a war escalates. and spins out of control. Caroline Levitt was asked about all this and sort of Trump's conflicting messages at the briefing. And she's talking about the negotiations and who they're negotiating with. And she said at one point, some of the previous leaders are now no longer on planet Earth because they lied to the United States and they strung us along in negotiations. And that was unacceptable to the president, which is why many of the previous leaders were killed. I do not, I think if you were one of the current leaders in Iran, I think that I don't know if that gets you to the table. Negotiate with us or die. Yeah. Yeah. You think that's going to get them get them to the table, get them into a negotiating mood? Trump has this belief in this strategic ambiguity. And I'm not imputing secret method and like magic to Donald Trump's ability to negotiate. But he absolutely believes that there's value to being ambiguous, that that gives you leverage. But eventually, eventually, you have to actually say what you're for, right? Like lay out what the actual endgame would look like and accept some kind of a deal or the conflict goes on forever. The like threats from the White House press secretary that you're going to kill more people unless you get a deal that has favorable terms. Like all of that is the is the is the stick. But like, what is the carrot? What does the deal look like? What would you accept? Right? It can't look like Obama's deal. right because that's the dreaded Obama deal it has to be favorable enough that Iran's willing to accept it so what does it look like to be a real world actor here so he's you know there's all these reports over the weekend like we said that so they're thinking of taking Karg Island or some of the other islands so they can control the oil or at least use the use the control of the islands as a bargaining chip in a negotiation because I think as Trump and the rest of the government recognize that maybe taking Karg Island is easier than holding Karg Island because then you have a bunch of troops on these islands and now the Iranians can just, you know, shoot away at them and try to pick them off. And you've got, you know, holding it is pretty difficult. And the same with the incredibly complicated and dangerous mission of going into Iran and getting out the nuclear material. And so you're starting to hear, you know, Rubio said, maybe we don't need ground troops for the objectives. And they think that maybe in a deal with Iran, you get the Iranians to like go with you to get the nuclear material, to take it out or give it to themselves or whatever else. But then the question is, why would the Iranians voluntarily give the nuclear material to the U.S. or open up the Strait of Hormuz? And maybe Trump thinks they would do it so that they wouldn't have all of their power plants and desalination plants bombed and that the bombing would stop. Although Trump's like, we have about 3,000 targets left and then we're done. So then what happens when the 3,000 targets are done and the regime is still standing and the Strait of Hormuz is still closed and the nuclear materials are still inside Iran. And then you're fucked. Then you have nothing else to do. And then from the other side of it. Which is why he's threatening war crimes for the civilian population, because he thinks he's like, well, I need some kind of a leverage. Well, I don't even like he's just thinking of it as something very hard to rebuild quickly, something that would exact a great price for the government. But but on the other side of it, that's the two sides were incredibly far apart, apparently before this war. Right. There wasn't a deal on the table before this war. And so why would Iran suddenly say, oh, we're going to toll the Strait of Hormuz and here are all these other things we're going to demand? Because they have to anchor this into a negotiation in which there's some cost to the U.S., some benefit to Iran for having endured this war, right? They can't just go back to the status quo ante before minus the nuclear program. At least that's what you would do in a negotiation. For them, the regime surviving, even with all this damage, is a win for them because then they can say and they can show the world the United States and Israel gave it everything they had and they did not destroy the regime. We're still standing. We were able to control the Strait of Hormuz. And now we get, you know, we lost a bunch of our leaders. But like we're Iran and they're the United States and Israel and we're still standing right now. Yeah. And they're like that. That's a win. It's not like the biggest win for them, but it's still a win. You know, the other there's been just all these reports that a lot of the Iranians are actually surprised by how easy it was to secure the strait of her moves that they've learned something from this conflict that gives them greater leverage in the future. All of this is about making the war a heavy price for the US to have to pay. I noticed that the Rubio did a interview today and I think with Stephanopoulos and then like the State Department was tweeting out some of the clips and the State Department's like the objectives of epic fury are clear. Destruction of the Iranian Air Force, destruction of the Navy, diminishing of missile launching capability and destruction of factories. That was it. Those are the those are the objectives. Nothing on the nuclear material, nothing on. Obviously, we've left behind like the Iranian people rising up and taking over their government. We've left that behind, too. Not even something on the strait reopening the strait, which was surprising, although it is kind of ridiculous. that now the objective of the war has become... Undoing a retaliation. Yeah, yeah. But like, is there a scenario where they're just like leaving and they're like, well, we'll figure out this straight at some point, but our objectives were very clear. We sunk a bunch of their ships and destroyed a bunch of their missiles and some factories that build the missiles and that's it. That's all we wanted. And the goal of the war was to destroy their missile capability so that in the event of a war, they wouldn't have the missile capability. uh the rubio also was like actually very clear about this he said he said and almost as an aside that after the conflict is over i'm paraphrasing but after the conflict is over then we're going to have to figure out what to do about the strait of hormuz so they've even conceded that this is a problem that's going to be continuing because i think if they decide not to go with ground troops then they're going to want to say we didn't do the ground troops big win they they started they're begging for a deal and you know we're going to do some kind of negotiations, but we're done. We're out. And the rest of the world's going to be like, well, the Strait of Hormuz is still closed. There's still a toll and blah, blah, blah. And they're like, oh, we'll figure that out later. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Whether you're dealing with anxiety, depression, conflict in relationships, or simply need an impartial third party to help you deal with daily stress, BetterHelp is there to connect you with the support you need. BetterHelp therapists work according to a strict code of conduct and are fully licensed in the U.S. BetterHelp does the initial matching work for you so you can focus on your therapy goals. A short questionnaire helps identify your needs and preferences in their 12-plus years of experience and industry-leading match fulfillment rate means they typically get it right the first time. If you aren't happy with your match, switch to a different therapist at any time from their tailored recs with over 30,000 therapists. BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform, having served over 6 million people globally, and it works with an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 for a live session based on over 1.7 million client reviews. We love therapy. Therapy's great. You should get some therapy. Everybody should get therapy. We're therapy boys. And as I've said before, I'm not currently in therapy because I'm so busy. It's make time for you. But when life is feeling overwhelming, therapy can help. Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp.com slash PSA. That's betterhelp.com slash PSA. pod save america is brought to you by hymns ed is more common than you think and simpler to treat than ever through hymns you can connect online with a licensed provider to access personalized treatment options discreetly and on your terms hymns offers access to ed treatment options ranging from personalized products to trusted generics that cost 95 less than brand names if prescribed you shouldn't have to go out of your way to feel like yourself hymns brings expert care straight to you with 100 online access to personalized treatments that put your goals first this isn't one-size-fits-all care that forgets you in the waiting room. It's your health and goals put first with real medical providers making sure you get what you need to get results. Think of HIMSS as your digital front door that gets you back to your old self with simple 100% online access to trusted treatments for ED and more all in one place. Take that grower to the big show with HIMSS, you know? To get simple online access to personalized, affordable care for ED, weight loss, and more. Visit HIMSS.com slash crooked. That's HIMSS.com slash crooked for your free online visit. hims.com slash crooked featured products include compounded drug products which the fda does not approve or verify for safety effectiveness or quality prescription requires the website for details restrictions and important safety information actual price will depend on product and subscription plan let's talk about the economic fallout from the war because that is around biggest leverage right now um economists and energy industry experts keep telling reporters that the fallout is only just beginning even if the war ends soon uh bloomberg talked to more than three dozen of these experts and said that, quote, one message was repeated over and over. The world still hasn't grasped the severity of the situation. Other countries are already dealing with energy shortages food supply shortages price shocks Here European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde summing up the view that the worst is yet to come in an interview with The Economist We are facing a real shock that is probably beyond what we can imagine at the moment. Do you think there is just a sort of blind optimism that somehow this is going to be over and the world will go back to normal? Well, maybe they are overly optimistic and determined to stay optimistic. Too much has already been damaged and there is no way that it can be restored in a matter of months. Most people are actually talking about years. And I think this is a crisis where we are learning almost bit by bit, day by day, what the actual consequences will be, what countries will be most affected, what of the commodities will be the most in demand. I saw some people comparing this moment to March of 2020, where a lot of the wonks and nerds and public health experts and economists were warning about how bad things were about to get because of COVID, while the public hadn't caught up quite yet. The top energy advisor for the S&P called the relatively mild market response so far that we're seeing, quote, irrational optimism. What do you think? Yeah, I think people think about this as oil being affected, but... There's helium, which is needed for semiconductor manufacturing and MRI machines. Cutter produces 35% of the world's helium. Key ingredients for fertilizer like ammonia, urea, sulfur, and phosphates. You have liquid natural gas. Aluminum production in Cutter is down. Doubt told its customers that you're raising the price of plastic, John. Thank you for that. It's also... So it's not just... It's hitting the rest of the world. probably even harder than the United States and we're already seeing that I'm just going to read you a couple quotes from different world leaders South Korea's president today said quote the world is in turmoil over the energy crisis the situation is so serious that it has even kept me up at night the immediate problem is grave enough but the outlook ahead seems even more unstable the situation is worse than expected Italy's defense minister of course I have to nick another hit for that I am forced now to think I am forced now to know things about what would happen in the coming week and the effects it will have on the economy and our daily lives that no longer allow me to sleep. Not a lot of sleep for foreign leaders all around the world. Yeah, there are ways the U.S. might be insulated. We have a lot. We have a lot of natural gas. And more helium than Qatar. But the possibility of a global recession will not spare us. I think this was it I think this was like a world historic mistake John I'm really worried about it I'm glad that I'm glad that Anyway we're taking this seriously We are taking this Talk to us like in a couple weeks We can play back that clip When there's like 2,000 points in the stock market And there's fucking you know gas lines everywhere No it's really fucking bad It's really bad We did that to prove a point We were highlighting. We were highlighting the point. And if this gets this information in front of more people, perhaps that was the goal, too. Yeah, and the destruction also, even if you open the strait, things will not bounce back. There'll be ripple effects for a long time. I genuinely think, like, you see this with Rubio. He's implying this a lot of the time, that he's trying to tell the Europeans and other countries, we need you to open the Strait of Hormuz, because honestly, Iran is just, like, so mad at us. But also because it's going to hit you more because we do actually have more helium. We do have natural gas, right? We are insulated from some of this. But in the long term, the ripple effects of this, the way this will ricochet across all different sectors, all different countries, like it will come for us. We will not be spared. We are insulated better than other countries. But we are also more sensitive than other countries because our consumers are pussies. It's just like, oh, a couple cents. Like, no, Iran is banking on the fact here that, you know, American consumers paying higher gas prices is going to cause a much bigger political problem for Donald Trump, relatively speaking, than even some of these much more severe crises in the rest of the world. And we're not insulated because, you know, once there's a if there's a global recession, God forbid, like that is going to affect the United States. You can't fucking escape that. And a recession while gas prices are cresting over $5 a gallon. People are already upset about prices. Like that is a worst case scenario politically for Trump and the Republican. And again, we were talking about the straight being opened again. But like that attack in Qatar on the natural gas, like it knocked out roughly 28 million tons of supply from the market this year of liquid natural gas. That represents nearly the entire global supply growth forecast for 2026. It could take years, this is from the New York Times, years for the flow of liquid natural gas from the Mideast to return to pre-war levels. And that is just like, forget if the straight opened tomorrow. That's just, it's done. It's destroyed. And that might benefit some American fossil fuel companies. That might actually help some stock prices. But we will, consumers will not benefit from that. Consumers will pay for a global change in supply. uh also trump's jawboning uh the the him trying to calm the markets with his crazy truths not really working anymore it's already started like to like he did it you know well first of all did you see the um did you see the our new guy in iran that we're negotiating with the speaker of parliament trolling trump on twitter now i did see this heads up pre-market so-called news or truth is often just a setup for profit taking basically it's a reverse indicator do the opposite it. If they pump it, short it. If they dump it, go long. See something tomorrow? You know the drill. The idea that we're in a back and forth where you have Trump trying to work the markets to avoid him feeling pressure to end the war and you have Iran trying to work the markets in the opposite direction, just so publicly, so baldly, because if the markets don't respond to what Trump is saying, he loses leverage in the negotiation. I mean, maybe honestly, as I'm talking myself into seeing it as a sign for hope, John. Well, but I think that like when Trump, the latest truth, when he said great progress and stuff like that, it just didn't. It's changing the markets less. Like the markets are responding not as much as they used to. The price of oil right now is still now way above 100. It was like 110, whatever, 112. I don't remember which firm, but a firm has created a pressure index. So there's a taco index that a financial firm has created. And basically it looks at a couple different indicators to come together, to put them together, to suggest the amount of pressure Donald Trump is under to argue for when he will cave on something important. And the reason I think that matters is because, yeah, you're right. The individual statements aren't causing the same kind of like corrections as we were seeing in the past. But I do think the underlying problem, and it speaks to what's going on in this conflict, too, is that the markets ultimately expect Trump to respect the markets. Right. That that that the whole the whole kind of irrational optimism of the markets is based on the idea that Donald Trump cares what happens to these markets. And that is like not something that's going to show ups and downs, but is going to be baked into an overall expectation. Right. And the question is, when does that give? Yeah, well, that gives because at some point Donald Trump caring about the markets isn't enough. Donald Trump respecting the markets or being worried about the markets isn't enough because if the oil isn't there or the gas isn't there, you know, like the fertilizer isn't there, there's nothing he can do about it. It stops being a symbolic television fight and it starts being a real world consequence. Which is where you can see from the price of oils and the markets right now, like that is where we're getting to right now, where they realize like, OK, Donald Trump can care all he wants about the stock market and his approval rating. that doesn't matter. He can't stop it. He like he he doesn't have the only vote here. One group of people who can't be accused of rational optimism are the MAGA types who've broken with Trump on Iran. There's a great Twitter exchange on Sunday where Ann Coulter tweeted, quote, this is Ann Coulter, watching Fox News assure viewers the Iran war is going super well and Trump is a total stud is like watching the same network assure viewers that the Dominion voting systems rigged the 2020 election and Trump was the winner. To which Marjorie Taylor Greene responded, quote, Fox News is now the fake news, brainwashing boomers to support what we voted against. What a what an exchange. I love it. There's nothing that makes me happier when Republicans get a taste for just a moment of what it feels like to be a Democrat like that. It's like they can't like what is happening there. They're misinforming the public. They're inoculating them against the reality of what's going on on the ground in a way that I find displeasing. brainwashing the boomers they just they just started brainwashing the boomers hey hey somebody call the police fox news has begun brainwashing the boomers breaking news things didn't seem to be going much better over at cpac the annual conservative get-together that just wrapped in texas uh let's take a listen a ground invasion of iran will make our country poorer and less safe. It will mean higher gas prices, higher food prices, and I'm not sure we would end up killing more terrorists than we would create. When it comes to Iran, how do you feel about that? I'm not happy. I'm not happy at all. I mean, President Trump ran on no new wars. I do question some of the things when it comes to are we just going to bend over everything for Israel, you know? This isn't, you know, what I voted for. What I voted for was domestic policy change at home and, you know, realistic forum. I think a lot of people, conservatives, young conservatives right now kind of disillusioned with Trump. I would consider myself one of those. So what could he do to win you back at this point? Not much. What a bunch of lib cucks. Was that a DSA meeting or was that... There was somebody... Matt Gaetz. Matt Gaetz. Somebody in the Times story said that MAGA is dying and that it was like a young person that said they felt like they had more in common at this point with the left than they did with older members. Yeah, she was like a 27-year-old Florida strategist. MAGA's dying. What a quote. Politico's up with a story full of more quotes like that from young men who attended. And we played this last week on a couple of our YouTubes, but you've probably seen the crowd unexpectedly cheered. The mention of articles of impeachment from Matt Schlapp. What do you make of the seeming discrepancy between what the polls are showing in terms of MAGA support for the war and what we are seeing and hearing from both very prominent MAGA types and some of the attendees at CPAC? So if you break up Trump supporters by age, and this is what Politico did as well, that more than two-thirds of those over 35 think Trump has a plan when it's less than half of those under 35. Two-thirds of older MAGA men were willing to sacrifice American lives in Iran compared with less than half of younger MAGA men. If you get your news on television or through Facebook, kind of in the old economy, and the old economy looks a lot like what Marjorie Taylor Greene is saying about Fox. But if you're younger, you're not watching cable the same way young people. Forget MAGA. No young people are watching cable. So where are you getting your news? You're consuming it from digital right wing news, which is much less interventionist, much more heterodox generally. And so because it's an older coalition, a huge shift amongst younger supporters might not show as big of an impact in the polls, but it does represent where they're headed. And I think the thing that's interesting about what you're seeing here at CPAC, and I think the same could probably be said about Turning Point USA, is the whole old right-wing media machine that Fox News came out of, radio came out of, it existed to create a space that was in defiance of the mainstream media. And that was the enemy. The enemy was the mainstream media. And you were defying that, that consensus. But the attitude of whether it's Tucker Carlson or Daily Wire or any of these other or the Rogan kind of independent universe, it's less about defying any one institution or defining yourself against the mainstream media than it more is about just being comfortable with being heterodox and being willing to say when even your own side is wrong. I think that's a genuinely different vibe from Fox, as you would find and say like the Daily Wire. And these young people are of that world, which is willing to be like, hey, we didn't vote for this. Like, fuck this. We're not. This is not about teams. Yeah. It's also very anti-institutionalist. Yeah. And Fox has obviously never really been that maybe when they first started. But like they are the institution. Right. Also, like one of the most common mistakes made in analyzing polls is that they are always, always, always a lagging indicator. and that a poll is telling you about what public opinion was two or three, four weeks earlier. I mean, just in the way that the poll was actually fielded, but also in just the way public opinion sort of filters down to folks who aren't paying as close attention to the news, but maybe still answer a poll. So like even today, you know, in Nate Silver's polling average of Trump's approval, he has Trump sub 40, like 39.7 for the first time. This is average approval rating, 39.7. He said his net approval is negative 17.4. That's the approval and the disapproval. Just by comparison, Trump was negative 19.1 after January 6th. So he's 17.4 now. Biden bottomed out at negative 20.5 after the debate. So Trump is like just in the worst territory that he's ever been and that other presidents have been. And to the point about the base, and Nate goes into this as well. Trump's strong approval, people who approve strongly of Trump, is down to 22.4%, which is its lowest ever. And the strong approval number has declined by more than his overall support, which means that like maybe you're not seeing it in like, do you like Trump or not like Trump? But the people who really like Trump, the base, the people who are excited about him, are down to 22%. Yeah, it's why you see a lot of reports about CPAC being a bit more space than usual in those ballrooms, that there's not the enthusiasm there was. Yeah, and there was a poll, I think it was the Harvard poll that came out today that showed more Americans prefer the Biden economy than the Trump economy. There's a lot of people reevaluating the comparison of Biden to Trump right now. Yeah, I mean, and I think that's because at least at the beginning of the Biden economy, when the inflation was really bad, there was like, well, there was COVID, he inherited COVID, and then like over time, you know, people had less patience for Biden not having fixed inflation. But again, with Trump, the difference is he did this. Like it's been so rare that there's been a crisis like this, like an economic crisis, especially where you're like, not, oh, the president presided over a recession and maybe you can blame them for this or that. But like, no, no, no, this is a, he did the tariffs, he did the war. He just did them. No one made him do it, he just did it. The Trump kind of yo-yo of attention on him leads his approval rating to fall sub 40 if you're lucky and then it bounces back to mid 40s thereafter and kind of hovers i do feel like we're into the more end of the biden term he shouldn't be running and we're still mad about inflation or post katrina bush where he's kind of found a floor and there's no way off of it that people have kind of come to a conclusion about trump i think that's where we're at yeah meanwhile the um the yahoo's who are running uh in the midterms the republicans they seem to be running some kind of experiment on just how unpopular they can make this war with voters in an election year. I give you the following Axios headline from Monday morning that's undoubtedly coming to a message box near you. Quote, GOP weighs health care cuts to pay for Iran war. Amazing. Just Axios puts up that the message box shapes a spotlight on the cloud. Dan on spring break. Dan's on spring break. He's with his family. He probably just like, what, What? Should you hear that? He like presses three keys on a piano, a little door opens up, he takes the pole down to the message box cave. Apparently Republicans in Congress are thinking about putting together a big new budget bill that would fund both the war on Iran and ICE, paid for in part by cutting Medicare, Medicaid and Obamacare. Just one idea. We're just floating the idea. But boy, is it a good one. For my question here, I'll just read you Axios' Why It Matters bullet. But new efforts to rein in health programs are sure to be controversial and open the GOP up to election year attacks that they're cutting health care to pay for an unpopular war. No shit. You think there's a Steve's Calise was asked about this and he said that they're looking for waste fraud and abuse. And it's so galling. It's so galling because it was a year ago when they passed the big, beautiful bill and cut a trillion dollars from health care claiming it was waste fraud and abuse. So are we meant to believe, Steve? They didn't get it all. They got to go back in. Did you leave some behind? Like the nuclear dust in Iran. Yeah, like just some, like a to-go bag of waste, fraud and abuse that you were going to come back to later. I can't think of a less popular way for them to try to find $200 billion to spend on the war in Iran, but they're getting close. Now, this would be a budget reconciliation bill because they know there's no way they could get 60 votes in the Senate. It would only need 51 votes in the Senate, which Republicans do technically have. What do you think the chances are they can get to 51? And I should say, I guess I assume I said that assuming that the House will pass it. But I don't even know if I assume that the House will pass it. I don't I don't assume the House will pass it. They don't have that. They don't have that much wiggle room in the House. Less and less all the time. Bo Burt has come out pretty forcefully against any kind of a supplemental. I don't think it gets better when the pay force are health care. But then again, some of these Republicans, even ones that haven't spoken yet, have one of the only places they've been willing to draw a line is they will not vote for bills that that raise the deficit. So it seems like they will need to find some kind of a pay for. So I don't know how this thing gets through the House. In terms of the Senate, you've got to assume Collins is a no. I mean, could you imagine? It's inconceivable that she'd be. I mean, look, she's who knows. But you assume she's a no. You assume Rand Paul is a no. So they can only lose one more. Murkowski has expressed skepticism. She's a no. There's no way she'll do that. So then you then that's it. And then I bet like if she's a no, why would Dan Sullivan be a yes? Because he's running against Mary Pultola. Who just has a new poll ahead. Right. So it's like then you maybe lose Sullivan. You get your right. Tillis is there. By the way, if Cornyn gets through this primary, we don't know when this vote will be. But, you know, before the before the vote, Cornyn's politics are fucked anyway. You slice it. But I would assume if you're in the Senate, what you're saying is we're not going to touch this unless the House passes it. Because I do think it's really hard to figure out how you get this kind of a thing through. Maybe they pick up John Fetterman also on the side side. What a vote for John Fetterman that would be. We're going to fully fund ICE. We're going to fully fund this war. We're going to cut your health. Now, I bet at the end the health care cuts, if you had to ask them whether they'd rather stomach health care cuts or a bill that raises the deficit in order to fund the war, I think they would go for, I think most Republicans in this caucus would go for the deficit. But doesn't reconciliation, like there are rules in reconciliation that they're going to have to find some fake way to pay for it. Yes, fake accounting bullshit. Yeah, but look, then we're talking about parliamentarians again and you have Republicans in the Senate who are committed to that. I don't know how this gets done. The politics of this are dog shit. And Fetterman aside, got to assume you have not a single Democratic vote for this. Yeah, I think you do. I hope that's the same in the House, but you don't know. It's just that they couldn't make the politics of this worse. No, they couldn't. Genius is an online insurance marketplace that allows you to compare quotes from some of America's top insurers side by side for free. Their license team helps you get what you need fast so you can get on with your life, easily find what you need. Coverage amounts, prices, terms, no guesswork, just clarity. Policy Genius helps you find the most affordable policy that meets your needs. They answer questions, handle paperwork, and advocate for you throughout the process. Policy Genius has thousands of five-star reviews on Google and Trustpilot from customers who found the best policy fit for their needs. I was just talking to a friend of mine. He's the third in line just in a country. And obviously, he's really concerned. Yeah. He's just really concerned about making sure he has the best life insurance policy. And I said, check out Policy Genius. Yeah, forget about the job security. It's more about the life security. Yeah, this was just somebody who said, like, hey, I want to make sure, you know, because I was seventh in line and then I was fifth. There were some developments. And I was like, oh, man, it sounds like things are pretty crazy in that country right now. He's like, yeah, it's pretty crazy in this country right now. Policy Genius. It's Germany. And I'm talking, yes, of course, Germany, Lichtenstein. Protect your family with a policy that grows with your life. With Policy Genius, you can see if you can find 20-year life insurance policies starting at $276 a year for $1 million in coverage. Head to policygenius.com slash crooked to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you could save. That's policygenius.com slash crooked. Starting a business can be overwhelming. You're juggling multiple roles, designer, marketer, logistics manager, all while bringing your vision to life. Shopify helps millions of business sell online. Build fast with templates and AI descriptions and photos, inventory and shipping. Sign up for your one euro per month trial and start selling today at shopify.nl. That's shopify.nl. It's time to see what you can accomplish with Shopify by your side. Speaking of ICE and DHS, the agency is still closed nearly 50 days into the shutdown, despite the fact that the Senate unanimously passed a bill on Friday that would fund all of DHS, including TSA, except for ICE and Border Patrol. But then House Republicans decided to snatch defeat from the Jaws victory by rejecting the Senate's unanimous bipartisan deal, passing a bill instead that would fund all of DHS for another 60 days and then leaving town for a two week recess. Trump then sided with the House right after signing a likely illegal executive order to pay TSA workers which I guess is now happening but raises the question of why didn he do that weeks ago Trump also still hasn given up on course in Congress to pass the SAVE Act and was asked about all of this on Air Force One ICE is vital to the well of our country and they are able to protect us from the animals I think the Senate is playing and playing it too soft. We're dealing with very sick individuals. The Democrats are sick. There's something wrong. They're like terrorists. The leader then told me that they do not have the votes to terminate the filibuster. I know, but that's part of being a leader. You have to get the votes. You have confidence in the leadership. I mean, I like him so much. He's a high-quality person. But that's what being a leader is. You have to get the votes. You have to get the votes. He sounds like an online lefty pundit. It's leadership or a right-wing pundit, too. Go get the votes. Go get the votes. What do you mean that's what being a leader is about? You get the votes. Yeah, the like the one thing just to note that if Mike Johnson had brought the Senate bill that had passed unanimously to the floor of the House, it would have passed with a huge majority of Republicans and Democrats, a huge majority. It would have gotten through fine. So he's doing his own politics. He's protecting himself against a few members of his caucus. He's worrying about Trump. That's that's what's happening here. So now the House Republicans and like Mike Lee and others in the Senate are trying to say that the Senate Republicans have, quote, buyer's remorse over their compromise. That's what Steve Scalise told ABC. And, you know, Mike Lee said the Senate should reconvene immediately. How did they fuck this up so badly? And like, do you think that flies? Oh, we actually had buyer's remorse. We didn't know. We didn't know that we were cutting a deal with the Democrats to reopen the government. It doesn't matter what they say, how they describe it. They left DHS shut down and went on vacation. Trump is paying TSA agents because that's what's been getting the worst headlines. But I don't see what the argument would be for why TSA agents should be paid, but not the other 50,000 or 100,000 people that are going without a salary who also work for the Coast Guard and do other all kinds of vital work that are also working without P that but that Americans don't see day to day when they're traveling. It's also retroactive, the EO that Trump signed for TSA. So he's now paid them for the two paychecks they missed. But no one knows what happens as we continue to go on and the shutdown drags on. Like there's no pool of money to pay them in the future unless the government opens up. So we're sort of going to be right back where we were. So like the lines in the airports are better today. But like what happens a couple weeks from now? Yeah. So let's assume that the filibuster continues to hold. And we don't have a reason to think it won't, though. I could see the Republicans realizing their only way out of this is with Democratic votes. And so they need to start threatening to remove the filibuster to get some Democrats to be more amenable to some kind of compromise. That's just one path that this could go. but assume the filibuster is holding democrats have a pretty simple position we talked about this with murphy chris murphy on friday senator from connecticut uh we won't pay for ice unless there are reforms and we've laid out those reforms now originally when this shutdown began it was so that there would be a negotiation over what the level of reform would be and the reforms necessary are impossible uh uh funding without the reforms would be unacceptable so you'd end up with some kind of compromise. There are people on the left that say the agency and some other online warriors that are not ideologically from the left that like any kind of compromise is unacceptable. Meanwhile, because ICE is funded through the big, beautiful bill, the only way of changing ICE is actually through funding it. That's just the reality. So that's what the original contours of negotiation were. But now actually, we're actually trying to extract something else, which is to force ICE to live off the money that it spent on the big, beautiful bill without our votes, right? But Republicans don't seem to be able to pass something without us. So I don't know what happens from here. But again, I don't understand. They have the, if they do another reconciliation bill, they have the ability per the deal that was passed unanimously in the Senate to fund ICE without the Democrats because they just need 50 votes in the Senate, 51 votes in the Senate, and they need a majority in the House. So just fucking open the rest of DHS, like everyone else voted to do in the Senate, Republicans and Democrats. And then the Democrats can say, like, we didn't vote to fund ICE or to give ICE more money. But if the Republicans really feel so strongly about ICE, they can fund ICE through reconciliation. Yeah, I do think this starts to boil down to how they pay for the $200 billion supplemental plus additional money for ICE. Yeah, and then we get back to our last conversation about why passing a new budget bill is just so hard. Yeah, I will just say, like, one hiccup in all of this If they really can't get to some kind of a deal without Democrats, if the House won't accept anything Democrats will accept and the Senate won't get rid of the filibuster, added political pressure on reconciliation. If they how can they possibly do a supplemental for Iran without funding DHS? You're telling me we're not going to fund the Coast Guard, but we're going to buy bombs for a war nobody voted for. They think it's going to. And that's probably part of the pressure, too. It's like, oh, you're going to keep you're going to keep everything shut down. Maybe they can make the funding bill about DHS and not necessarily the war, which also seems fucking crazy. I mentioned earlier that both the Senate and the House are in a two-week recess. TMZ has become very politicized now. The outlet. They're hungry for the juicy details of what members of Congress are doing while TSA staff are, quote, according to TMZ, selling their blood to keep a roof over their heads. They caught Lindsey Graham at Disney World and posted some of these photos with the headline, Lindsey Graham living in fantasy land as government shutdown drags on. TMZ also posted a story about Democratic Congressman Robert Garcia being in Vegas, though Garcia responded by pointing out that his dad lives in Vegas. And they quote, Speaker Mike Johnson should have never sent us all home, making it clear that the House could have simply passed the Senate's compromise. Garcia also said, like, call us back. We'll come back. We'll we'll pass at any time. You know, what do you think about the recess as an additional pain point for Republicans in the politics of all this? And do you think it's enough for Democrats to just say what Garcia did about recess? Republicans, because of a fight between Donald Trump, Senate Republicans and House Republicans. That's who the fight is between. Kept the Department of Homeland Security. Right. Meant to protect us from all kinds of threats. Which are, you know, rising in a time of war that they started. They have not been able to come to agreement amongst themselves to fund DHS. There is an agreement with Democrats. We made one. We passed 100 to zero in the Senate. Not a single objection. 100 to zero, passed a bipartisan funding bill to cover DHS and allows ICE to continue to operate, right, according to what Republicans wanted, because ICE has sitting on tens of billions of dollars from the big, beautiful bill. And in the last moments, Republicans abandoned that and then left the city, just left while that is ongoing. So of course, we should be exploiting it. And yeah, Robert Garcia can go visit Vegas, you know, put a couple. Democrats can do whatever they want because it's like, like, you know, you want Democrats have nothing to do with this at this point. If Democrats went back to D.C. and were hanging out in Congress, they still can't do anything. Yeah. They don't control Congress. They can't figure out. They can't solve the fucking Republicans problem for them. We do so much like so much of politics now is just like all these kinds of symbolic battles. And like the truth is Lindsey Graham being at Disney World is like a symbol is an aesthetically bad thing. Right. Because he should be in D.C. working. The problem is Congress isn't in session because Republicans don't know what to do anyway. And they all want to go do whatever they do on their recess in their districts and on their free time. For Lindsey Graham, I guess, is to go to Disney World with friends. I thought I was like, oh, he's there with a nephew or niece. He was just there with friends. Going on Space Mountain. apparently holding a toy for a young girl who was going into the bathroom. I was like, it's just weird. I don't understand. Listen, I don't understand Liddy Graham's life. I don't understand it. I don't know what brings him joy. I'll tell you what brings him joy. Space Mountain? Dropping bombs? Dropping bombs in Iran brings him joy. Yeah. Yeah, I saw him at, he was at, also he was at the buffet at the Contemporary, at the Contemporary Hotel. I've been at that buffet. It's a great buffet. I've been at the buffet. Me too. On the hour, the big mouse comes out, says hi to the kids. I was there with my nephew at the time. So that's what Lindsey Graham is up to. We should just stop there. Speaking of Homeland Security shutdowns, did you see the Washington Examiner story about how Border Patrol had to shut down several social media accounts that Greg Bravino tried to bring with him to retirement after being booted from Minneapolis and Trump's good graces? It's a funny story. I did see that. You know, back when L.A. used to make television shows, people would talk about what showrunners would be the hardest people to work for. And inevitably it was like men in their like 50s who just fucking hated their wives and their lives because all they had was their jobs. And so like, even though the show would basically, they'd written the script, it's already done. And they'd be like, we got to keep working. We got to keep going. We got to power through because they didn't really want to go home. I feel like Greg Bovino maybe doesn't want to go home. He wants to keep working. He wants to keep posting. He wants to post through it. He wants to post through it. Apparently he'd amassed 850,000 followers on Facebook instagram and x combined and so when they tried to take those accounts back because they were the government accounts that belong to whoever the commander is out in fucking california wherever it was he said those are my followers so i'm taking them with me it's hey man bovino you want your rss feed you gotta negotiate that at the top it's ridiculous it's ridiculous it is funny because when you go to the twitter account now that used to be greg bovino and now it's just like you know whatever that central command for border patrol is. It looks like an official account and there's no picture of any person attached to it. But the tweet at the top is Governor Pritzker. Perhaps you'll get a clue and realize illegal aliens, all caps, will continue killing Americans until they're removed. Like Stein in NC and Newsom with spelled O-M-E in California. This is your fault. Thumbs down, thumbs down. Just just just just an official just an official account with a lot of posts calling women sweetie. Exactly. Yeah. Yeah, no, it's, yeah. Anyway, good luck, Mark Wayne Mullen, trying to get your arms around that department. All right, one last thing before we go. As you heard a bit earlier, Trump isn't letting the war and the shutdown get in the way of his real priority, building the ballroom, which he explained in great detail to the reporters on Air Force One, even flipping through visual aids that he'd brought along for the occasion. Let's take a look. These pictures we just made today, we have all bulletproof glass. We have drone proof roofs, ceilings, everything's drone proof. This is a view of the columns. Beautiful. And they are going to be made. They're going to be hand carved. Ooh. And top of the line, there'll be Corinthian, which is considered the best, most beautiful by far. This is a view of it from the north, and that's, if you see it, it fits in with the White House. It's almost a twin to the White House. It's something we just wanted to pay tribute to the White House. And so that fits in beautifully. Let me just see another one. Here's another one. Excuse me, wait. I thought I'd do this now because it's easier. I'm so busy that I don't have time to do this. I'm so busy. But I'm fighting wars and other things. But this is very important because this is going to be with us for a long time. very important Times had an incredible piece this weekend titled Trump's ballroom design has barely been scrutinized architects say it shows what'd you make of their critiques I think we have a we can actually the Times did a it's just very tall yeoman's work here very tall very tall yeah you see right there it says very tall grand staircase doesn't lead to ballroom there's another arrow that just says no entrance here and then another arrow on the side that says entrance is actually here uh one just says unnecessarily big so yeah first also man when you're walking into a building and someone just says don't worry it's drone proof it doesn't make you feel good it doesn't make you excited about it so there's no way to build a i don't know what was 90 000 square foot ballroom uh without it being a hideous monstrosity you're adding a walmart to the white house so it's gonna be ugly uh i don't care how many corinthian columns you throw at the thing. You know, Trump made that, made the point that just as it were ahead of schedule on the ballroom, we're also ahead of schedule on the war in Iran. I actually do think it's a good analogy because he knocked down the East Wing and that in a completely capricious and unplanned way only to turn around and quickly kind of based on just sort of sketches approve a massive change to the White House. And the second you start peering at it closely, it raises all kinds of questions, questions that nobody seems to have asked because they're all being driven by Donald Trump, who only wants to be told, yes, sir, great idea, sir, taller than ever, sir, Corinthian column, sir. Also, the first architect went the way of the first Diatola. Yeah, yeah. They shit can the first architect. This is the second one. And they also have like fake windows on the north side with bathroom stalls behind them, apparently. This thing looks like... I had not really, because there's a lot going on, really concentrated on how ugly and stupid this thing looks. But it is really bad. It's vandalism. These people are vandals. The ballroom is more than three times as large as the White House residence. So there's the West Wing, The White House residence is everything you see, mostly when you look at pictures of the White House. It is three times the size of that. What a fucking eyesore that's going to be. Yeah. So I remember, like, Ryan, remember we, like, made that graphic that showed – I couldn't believe what they were saying, that they were really making something this big. Because if you actually look at the footprint that they were talking about before we saw the plans, that can't be. It's so much bigger than the actual White House. But then you look at what they've actually laid out, and that is what it is. And as like these drawings make clear, like it is going to it's just going to be a blight in that area. It's going to change all kinds of sites. It's going to be bigger than the white. It's going to be more. You're going to see it because it's so big. So that's what you'll see. You won't see the White House. It's all you'll see. It's, you know, when we first started talking about this and people were like really angry about it, I was like and they're like, oh, every Democratic candidate who runs for president has to like promise to immediately bulldoze the Trump ballroom. And I was like, you know, at the end of the day, it's Trump built it. But if it's a ballroom that's nice or whatever, you know, I don't think any president should have put it in. I certainly don't think Trump would have. But like, you're really going to bulldoze it. That seems like this. Yeah, I think you fucking take this thing down. That's three times the size of the fucking residence. I think before we even get there, I do think like it's clearly been something that broke through for people. And the idea that we are at a time when people are spending so much for gas, when we're at war, when people feel like the Trump has fundamentally failed to care about the things he said he was going to do. The fact that they are building this monstrosity is just going to be a beacon of everything that has gone wrong with this administration. And we should use it that way. And by the way, like, I don't know how you get to build something this big as quickly as they claim they're going to build it. He's already behind. He already fired one architect to get somebody who's willing to do this. So it is going to be it is already a debacle and it will continue to be a debacle and no it's not the most important thing in the world that he's doing this but as a symbol of everything uh trump represents this vanity project where he's kind of like vandalizing dc for his own egomaniacal purposes while the world burns i think is like a fitting tribute i'll tell you if the approved ratings keep going down and you know they lose the midterms and all that and it's like year seven and eight and he's got us in whatever other god knows what wars um and he's sitting at like 25, 30% approval, he's going to be spending most of his days. He's going to be the foreman of the project. He's just going to be wandering around this old man in a ballroom. Look at that cornerstone, hard hat on, little light walking around like, oh, this was beautiful. This is from, this is Carrera marble. Beautiful stuff here. I chose every toilet. I chose every toilet. They said it couldn't be done to have this kind of a toilet here. I said we could have this kind of a toilet here. Just the smallest possible coterie of aides and sycophants around him being like, Sir, the ballroom is going great today. It's amazing. J.D. Vance is in Iowa claiming that he never wanted the war with Turkey and that he actually wasn't for it. All right. Speaking of the midterms, Iowa Senate candidate Josh Turk stopped by the Cricket Studios on Friday to talk with Tommy all about his race. You'll hear that right after the break. Pod Save America is brought to you by ActBlue. ActBlue provides Democrats up and down the ballot with the tools they need to run effective campaigns and win. Fundraise, organize, build campaign websites, and donate with solutions that are easy to use. ActBlue has been there through our country's biggest moments. Our partners at Vote Save America create digital fundraising pages on ActBlue platform for initiatives like the Anxiety Relief Program. It's easy to create the donation pages and add features like goal tracking monitors and design custom branding. and the funds are processed quickly and safely. ActBlue never sells your data or personal information. They focus on security so you can focus on what matters most. We love ActBlue. You know, Votes of America uses it. It's critical to the Democratic Party's infrastructure. Why are Republicans trying to go after it in unfair ways? Well, because they know it helps. It's effective. And what's the magic? The magic is it's easy to use and easy to donate. That's it. That's what's great about it. So whether you're running for office or want to make an impact, ActBlue has the tools to help you make it happen because the right time to get involved is right now. Donate, organize, and raise money for candidates and causes you believe in at actblue.com slash crooked. Starting a business can be overwhelming. You're juggling multiple roles, designer, marketer, logistics manager, all while bringing your vision to life. Shopify helps millions of business sell online. Build fast with templates and AI descriptions and photos, inventory, and shipping. Sign up for your one euro per month trial and start selling today at Shopify.nl. That's Shopify.nl. It's time to see what you can accomplish with Shopify by your side. My guest today is running to be the Democratic nominee in this year's Iowa Senate race. Josh Turek, great to have you in studio. Thanks for having me. Thanks for being here. So you and Zach Walls, you're running to be the Democratic nominee. It's an open seat. We've invited Zach to come on too. We're trying to figure that out. The primary is June 2nd. I just want to say at the top, I am very bullish on Iowa this cycle. We have a huge opportunity in Iowa, I think, because we got Rob Sand running for governor. He's a great candidate. You have a wide open Senate race. You have three targeted house races and you can run in Iowa for just a little less money than Texas, would you say? A lot less money than Texas. We're a cheap date. You're a cheap date. And the state that I think for a lot of structural reasons that we'll get into is primed for a flip. So I just hope people who are listening think about Iowa, invest in Iowa, because it's not the flashiest state right now in terms of like, you know, where the attention is in the media, but I think it's really important. Let's just start with your story though. Sure. You represented the United States in four Paralympic games, I think you said. You won two gold medals in wheelchair basketball. More amazingly, I think I heard you say you got cut six times before you made the team. I did. Can you just tell us your story and your experience, like how you got there? Yeah. Well, first, born with my disability, born with a condition called spina bifida due to my father's exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam. So I had my first surgery at one day old. I had 21 surgeries before I was 12, almost all of which took place at Shriners Hospital in Minnesota. Because it's the only way that my family could afford it. Yeah, wheelchair basketball was one of the things that honestly saved me. as a kid, I was bullied really, really badly and actually ended up leaving public school briefly because of how badly I was bullied. And wheelchair basketball really gave me something to fight for and fell in love with it. Got a scholarship to play at Southwest Minnesota State University, scored over 4,000 career points there. So just barely, barely beat out Caitlin Clark. Casual flex there with the 4,000 points. Something I'm really proud of. And then I had an amazing opportunity of something I didn't even know existed, which was to play professional wheelchair basketball. It doesn't exist here in the States. And I had the amazing opportunity to play and live in places like Spain and Italy and France and Australia. By the time I was done between club and country, got to live in every continent on it, or at least visit every continent, play basketball in every continent on earth besides Antarctica. And then the highlight of my career without a doubt was four Paralympic games, two gold medals. And you were right. I made my very first Paralympic team straight out of college. And that was 2004. And as you know, as a basketball nation, if you don't win, it's basically like gold or failure. And we got knocked out in the quarterfinals. I know. And then they changed coaches. And I say, there's a beauty and a beast to represent in the USA in basketball. The beauty is that you're going to have an amazing opportunity to win a gold medal. The beast is there's so many good players that you never know if you're going to have the opportunity to represent again. And they switched coaches. And for six straight years, cut, cut, cut, cut, cut. And I just kept coming back and I said, eventually you are not going to take my dream away from me. Eventually I'm going to get so good that you're going to take me. And I finally made the team again in 2011, which was the qualifier for the, for the Paralympics. And then in 2012, won a bronze medal in London. I led the team in scoring and rebounding. And that bronze medal uh means almost as much to me as those gold medals because it represents that hard work and struggle of of trying to get back there and then had the fort like the great fortune of being able to to to to end my career back-to-back gold medals that was that was amazing with my brother and you do you'd create a real deep brotherhood that's incredible i mean like okay that i mean that's gritty as hell getting cut twice would probably uh end me but six times and you're just stuck to Like you, what were you doing with the rest of your time? Were you like working and then training? I was playing professionally. Okay. So you were playing professionally, training every day there and then trying out for the team and just like just couldn vibe with this coach It wasn a matter of vibe I mean I I just you had to get bigger faster stronger better i mean you looking at being one of the 12 best players in the entire country and but i had that discipline in that that work ethic of whether it was focusing on my diet or my supplementation or my sleep i was just willing to do whatever it took uh to get to that next level i would go and shoot a thousand shots every single day, rain or shine, hot or cold, go and lift weights every day. Most days I would end my day with a road push in my, in my everyday wheelchair. And I would go for somewhere between seven and 14 miles. I mean, I was just willing to do the work, which honestly, I think was some of the very best preparation for what modern politics has turned into like that discipline and hard work, uh, inability also to just ignore the external noise and just keep your head down and do the work. It's, it's really been great preparation for this. I was going to say most politicians, we can't get them to like show up to vote. So I feel like you're, you're a little ahead of the game there. Um, you mentioned, uh, spina bifida, your dad served in Vietnam. He had Asian orange exposure, which is linked to spina bifida, caused spina bifida, but also I think makes you eligible for VA benefits. Correct. That is correct. Yeah. Um, so I'm just curious, you know, that is a, uh, a very different connection to the military in war than most Americans have. And we are at this moment, we're recording this Friday, March 27th. By the time it comes out on Tuesday, we could have troops on the ground in Iran in yet another crazy, in my opinion, regime change war in the Middle East. I just wondered how your experience of like hearing your father's story and going through the VA care process has shaped your views of these issues. Yeah. And we're looking at going into another forever unnecessary conflict that I've seen far too often in my life. It's not just my direct family connection. It's in my time in wheelchair basketball as well. I've played with so many men and women that have come back missing arms, missing legs that are just never the same. And then my daddy spent 22 months in Vietnam exposed to Agent Orange and it's reason for my disability. And these conflicts, they don't just disappear. They have generational consequences. And certainly I'm living proof of that generational consequence. And for example, like a state like Iowa, even though we don't have boots on the ground in Iran, we are already paying a high price for this conflict. We've already lost three Iowans because the base that was hit in Kuwait. Those were largely national guardsmen from Iowa. And we're looking at spending a billion dollars there. No strategy, no idea what's happening, why we're there. And, you know, we've got a state like Iowa where we are dead last for economic growth. One of two states already in economic decline. We're closing hospitals and schools, dead last for, you know, road quality. We could use that billion dollars a day in a state like Iowa as opposed to another unnecessary forever conflict. Yeah. I mean, there are a bunch of reports. We don't know if they'll actually do this, but that the administration was going to go to Congress to request $200 billion for the war in Iran. And I just, you know, I think in the beginning there was this sense of like, should Democrats vote for it? Will they be called weak? Will they be told they're not supporting the troops? I hope by now Democrats in Washington understand that this is an enormous opportunity to show voters that we want to spend that money anywhere else. Correct. Anywhere, schools, roads, bridges, like anything you want in Iowa, like not bombs that get dropped on, you know, faraway places and people. We cut a trillion dollars with the big, beautiful bill to people's health care. 110,000 Iowans lose their health care benefits. Thousands more lose their food assistance. We don't have money for the ACA subsidies to continue, which is another 117,000 Iowans looking at premiums doubling or tripling. We've closed in the last 15 years in Iowa, 250 more medical clinics than we've opened. And so we're closing nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities and rural hospitals all over the state, but we have money for an unnecessary war in Iran. It's just such a disconnect and it's not America first. No, it really isn't America first. And you're seeing a lot of Republicans get extremely pissed off and turn away from Trump. Changing gears a bit. So California governor Gavin Newsom often talks about having dyslexia and like sort of the obstacles it's created in his life, how he's overcome them. I think president Trump must have caught an interview with him talking about that, probably in the context of his book tour, and now just attacks Gavin Newsom about it constantly. Here's one example I wanted to play for you and sort of get your reaction. Gavin Newsom has admitted that he has learning disabilities. Honestly, I'm all for people with learning disabilities, but not for my president. I think a president should not have learning disabilities, okay? And I know it's highly controversial to say such a horrible thing. The president of the United States, Gavin Newsom, admitted that he has learning disabilities, dyslexia. Everything about him is dumb. So he's an asshole. What message do you think those comments send to kids in this country with dyslexia or learning disabilities, really any disability? It's gross. It's not the first time he's done it either. I mean, unfortunately, I've dealt with bullies my whole life, and we've got of bully in the Oval Office. And I think my message would be to any disabled person out there, any disabled kids is don't let what anyone says to you, including the president of the United States, prevent you from living your best life or being able to live your dream. And you can look at someone like me. I grew up poor. I grew up disabled, 21 surgeries. I feel like I am the American dream. But I have the American dream because of something like the American with Disabilities Act, the father of the American Disabilities Act, Senator Tom Harkin from Iowa. And don't let that define you. I think that's my message is that you can ultimately be what you want to, and you can do what you want here in America and do not let anyone stop you or make you feel like you are less, including the president of the United States. And unfortunately, I will say that, you know, one of the reasons why I got into politics initially, I got involved in politics for two reasons. One is because of the privatization of Medicaid in Iowa, it was driving up rates, denials, and delays 1,000% since we had privatized. That was hurting the disabled population the most. Second reason why I ran is because there had never been a permanently disabled member in the Iowa legislature. We're a state of 150 years, governing body of 150 members. We didn't even have a ramp in the Capitol. It's the people's house. It should be open to the people. and the disabled population one in five iowans blind deaf intellectually disabled physically disabled and yet almost no representation one of the reasons why i'm doing this as well running for the u.s senate is i don't think we have enough individuals up in the u.s senate uh you know that are disabled that come from my minority group i think you could make the argument that out of any minority group we are the most underrepresented at every single level of government and then additionally, I think we need more people in DC from places like Council Bliss, Iowa, with real lived experience, both on the economics and on the healthcare side. Because when you have lived it firsthand, you'll have a different level of fight and you'll have a different level of empathy. And that's what we need. We need folks that are going to go up there and fight for the people and fight for our workers and fight for the middle class, fight for the people that can't afford, you know, to make political donations or have a lobbyist. Yeah. It's remarkable. I remember early on, Trump at a rally made fun of a disabled reporter, right? And it was like, it was like a big deal. Yeah. He made fun of this. I think it was Serge Kovalevsky. He was actually like, I used to work in the press office on the campaign for Obama and then the White House. And he was one of the scariest reporters out there because he was so good. You know, like this guy was like the heaviest hitter. And then Trump's like belittling him for something. You know, he's the worst person in the world. And it's a decade later, he's still pulling this shit. We're kind of like a nerd to it, but your point about just the total lack of empathy in government and the lack of focus on, you know, people who he doesn't understand or who don't have a lobbyist or representation. And the interesting thing is that Iowa actually has this really proud history of having a fighter named Tom Harkin. It was like the greatest champion for the, for a lot of communities. I mean, can you just talk about Tom Harkin and sort of what he means to the state and what he's meant to you? Yeah. For 30 years, we had the amazing opportunity to have Senator Tom Harkin as, as our Senator from Iowa. Uh, he was championing issues like FMLA, uh, to make sure that you've got leave. And, uh, and, and certainly he is the father of the American with Disabilities Act. And, you know, it's, it's great because I now have a friendship with him and, and, and that's that, you know, they say never meet your heroes. And, and he, he was everything and more and just an amazing human being. And I, this is one of the reasons why I'm also running for this is because for 30 years in Iowa, we had this amazing opportunity to have somebody that was really fighting for the people, fighting for the most vulnerable, the elderly, the disabled, the homeless, the poor, children, you know, the schools, a true prairie populace, the same way that I define myself, looking for a livable wage, affordable housing, affordable healthcare. That's what he was fighting for. And I think that this is a once in a generation opportunity that we have here in Iowa to win his seat back and that we can once again, from Iowa having someone that's really fighting for the people. Yeah, I agree. It's once a generation opportunity. Iowa is a huge ag state and President Trump seems to be doing everything he can to piss off farmers, to make their lives harder, to destroy their industries and literally decades of work in some cases. There's tariffs, there's Trump pitching a $20 billion bailout for Argentina, where a bunch of farmers are growing soybeans to compete with Iowa farmers, literally. Now there's this war with Iran that is preventing fertilizer shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, which is jacking up prices in America and starving people in Southeast Asia, potentially. What is the impact of Trump's policies been on farmers in your state? And what would you say to a listener who thinks, you know what, you guys talk about this stuff all the time. You act like economic concerns are what move voters. But then, you know, you know, you'll have these farmers who will get mad about some segment on Fox News and they'll vote on some culture thing. It's a real farm crisis, what I'm calling a farmageddon. Our farmers, we now lead the nation in farm foreclosures in Iowa. It is a massive problem. You're looking at commodities prices being upside down, and that is largely driven because of the tariffs. That's also because of us giving $20 billion to Argentina so the Chinese can buy their soybeans. Meanwhile, our Iowa soybean farmers just left out there hanging. These markets maybe will never come back. You're absolutely right as well. You're looking at fertilizers. You're looking at now somewhere between 25 and 30% of Iowa farmers do not have fertilizer. Meanwhile, we're maybe a month or two away from planting season. So what does that mean for them? Can they plant their crops if they don't have fertilizer? I mean, the yield would be way down? The yield would be dramatically different. I mean, you're already looking at all these folks being upside down. I mean, our farmers have not made money in a decade and now their commodities prices are actually upside down. So they are planting soybeans and they are losing money on that. And it's not just exclusively the tariffs. They've been getting beaten up because of consolidation and anti, you know, we've not done anything to break up the monopolies. We've not done anything on antitrust and farmers are hurting. And I tell you everywhere that I'm going all across Iowa, but the place that we are getting the biggest amounts of turnouts of Republicans is in rural communities. And the word that we hear the most is betrayal. And these folks will say, we turned out, we voted for Trump. And now look what you've done. And you go in these rural communities and they've lost, their pharmacies are gone. They've lost their grocery stores. Their healthcare clinics are closing, particularly in the rural areas. Their schools are closing. We closed 16 schools in the last three years in Iowa, almost all in the rural communities. And you go down their main streets, it looks like a vacuum has come through there. And now we're leading the nation in farm foreclosures. These are folks that are waking up and saying, enough is enough. The state and the country needs change. And I think that they're going to be willing to vote for someone like me, a common sense prairie populist. The other area where I'm seeing a lot of accusations of betrayal is the Maha movement, the Make America Healthy Again movement, which, you know, I think sort of kicked off with vaccines and vaccine hesitancy, if not outright sort of anti-vaccine sentiment. But there's also just like healthy foods and getting dyes out of food. Right. There's a lot of it that's like makes sense, common sense. But it seems like a recent Trump decision to give immunity from lawsuits to companies that make the weed killer Roundup has infuriated those voters. I know Roundup has ties to cancer, can cause cancer. And I read somewhere recently that the highest concentration of Roundup is in Iowa, which also happens to be part of the cancer belt, which is sort of the highest concentration of cancer. What is the impact of that ruling on your state? And like, you know, I was talking to Rob Sand when he was in here and he said every single town hall he has, some person in their 30s will say, I have cancer. My friend has cancer. My family has cancer. And like it didn't used to be that way. That is correct. Yeah, Iowa, we're the only state with a growing cancer rate. We have the second highest rates of cancer behind Kentucky, and we are quickly catching Kentucky. This is an issue that I actually think day by day is growing in terms of there's not a single town hall that I have done where I haven't heard this issue about addressing the cancer rates and addressing the water quality issues. And it is, it's, there is a direct correlation to what we're seeing with the nitrate levels, with the pesticide levels that is leading unquestionably to the cancer rates. And certainly this is an issue that has touched my life personally. I lost my grandma to pancreatic cancer. My father, because of his exposure to Agent Orange, he's dealt with several bouts of cancer. And nearly the day that I launched my campaign, my sister got diagnosed with stage two breast cancer. Okay, sorry. And to, yeah, she just underwent a double mastectomy. about two weeks ago to tell you how broken the healthcare system is. She has private insurance and her private insurance came to her and basically said, you don't have enough cancer. They said, because you only have stage two breast cancer, not stage three or stage four, we will not cover the PET scan to see if the cancer spread to other parts of your body. That's insane. So we did not know if the cancer had spread to her lymph nodes or any other place until she went under the knife. I mean, this is what is so fundamentally wrong with the healthcare system is you're maximizing profits just for the off the backs and most vulnerable. But absolutely, this addressing the cancer rate and addressing the root cause, which is the lack of regulations in place on what we're seeing with the nitrate levels. And there's some common sense things that we can do that the farmers are in favor of doing. We don't have to go up to the farmers. We could put a lot of incentives in place. We could put incentives so that they don't put down fertilizer in the fall and in the winter. We can put down incentives so that they put down cover crops or they have land barriers like many other states do. Or we can at least have an EPA that's well-funded and with some enforcement mechanisms in place and maybe droplets allowable with nitrate levels. But it's certainly something that is resonating with all Iowans, regardless of where they sit on the political spectrum. Yeah. I think it crosses across. All families are dealing with a crisis of someone. And Iowans are tired of us just looking out for large corporations and billionaires. When giving this chemical company, I think they got a national security exemption because some version of Roundup is used as like when like white phosphate or something, some military use. It's insane. It's awful. Anyway, so you're in a Democratic Party primary. I realize you are probably Iowa nice, but ultimately, like voters are going to have to hear why you're better at the job than Zach Walls would be. What's the pitch and why do you think you're more likely to win in November? I will be Iowa nice and I won't say anything disparaging about my primary opponent, but I will say this. First and foremost, I think this comes down to electability. I represent the reddest district that is represented by a Democrat that was won on election day. The two communities that I represent, Carter Lake, Trump won by 18 points. In my hometown of Council Bluffs, Trump won by 10 points. And I was able to win my district by nearly six points. That is 50% more over performance than any other Democrat in the state. my opponent comes from a Harris plus 37 has never even run against Republican. So I know that I have proven results of being able to resonate with the 35% of the voters that are independents and also with moderate Republicans. Even though I was so far down ballot, I actually got more raw votes than Kamala Harris did. I know that there's something specific about my story, my background, my resume that really resonates with independents and with moderate Republicans. And I know that especially my story, the hard work of focusing on the economic populism, that's going to resonate with a lot of people in rural communities and with farmers. Second, I would say that it's meaningful and important that the people that have left the race, like J.D. Scholten and Nathan Sage, the people that know us best, that were out there on the campaign trail with us, have endorsed me. I also think that it's really important that I've got far more endorsements of the people that work up at the Iowa Capitol with me and with Zach than know us the best. I've gotten by far the most amount of endorsements there. I think that means a lot to me. And raised the most money since I've been in the race. And then I also think that there is an authenticity and a credibility that I think really, really resonates. I come from a working class family, a working class community. I'm the only one in this race that's not a millionaire. And I think that that's what Iowans are looking for. They're looking for someone that's genuine, that is not doing this for the position, for the money, for the fame, but is really doing this because we need people in D.C., not from wealth, not from privilege, but are really going up there to do like what Senator Harkin did and fight for the people of Iowans and fight for small businesses and fight for small family farms and fight for social and economic justice and fight for social safety nets that are being eroded. these social safety nets like Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security, and are going to go up there and fight for people's health care and a livable wage. And my state is really, really struggling like no other state. Dead last for economic growth. Yeah. So right now, the attention's on like Texas and some of the other states. Do we want to keep it that way? Do you want people to pay more attention to Iowa? Do you like that the national media is focused elsewhere and you can kind of just run your own race focused on Iowa issues? Um, you know, I don't want this to be siloed. I don't want this to be about, I want to get to the U S Senate and to, and to heck with everybody else. And so I like the attention being on Iowa. And my message to your viewers would be the very best place to invest this year is in Iowa. Uh, Iowa, I understand that people on the coast will say Iowa is a red state, but we are not, we are a common sense state that has masqueraded more red than what we are. 30 years. We voted for Senator Harkin. We're a state that has voted twice for Obama, three times for Trump. We have more Obama-Trump counties than any other state in the union. But in much more recent history, Trump's last midterm, we won three of the four congressional races. We almost won all four, three points away. And in the last midterm that we had, we were 1.5% away from having three of our six statewide officials being Democrats. That means your average Iowa voter went and voted for three Dems, three R's. We also are a state that has bottomed out. And sometimes I think you have to bottom out as a state like Kansas did before people are willing to go a different direction, but we are dead last for economic growth. We're 48th for personal income growth. We're one of two states already in an economic decline. We're basically dead last for every single healthcare metric, closing healthcare facilities all over the state. We lead the nation in cancer rates, and now we lead the nation in farm foreclosures. We have bottomed out, and then we have no power of incumbency. This is the first time since 1968 open governor's race and open Senate race and two open congressional races. Iowa is going to be the center of the political universe. This is a state that we can legitimately see flipping three congressional races. We can win this open governor's race and we can win this open Senate race. I mean, we had an independent poll that came out that showed myself and Ashley Henson tied. So that's why I want the national attention in that regard of this isn't just about me. This is about we in Iowa have this once in a generation opportunity where if we go and we're organized and we're coordinated, we not only have the opportunity to change our cities or change our communities, you know, change our counties, we can fundamentally change the state. And the amazing opportunity we've got in Iowa is if we're able to flip these three congressional races, we flip Congress. But then the amazing opportunity, which people would have said was blasphemous to talk about a year ago, which is you need four states to flip the Senate, maybe North Carolina, maybe Maine, that looks really good. Ohio looks very good with Sherrod Brown, but seat number 51 in the U.S. Senate, majority control. I believe it's Iowa and we can win this and we can win it with a candidate like me. I think, uh, I think we should be investing a lot of money and time in Iowa. If voters want to, uh, if they like what they're hearing and they want to help you out, where do they go? Yeah, they go to my website, Turek, T-U-R-E-K, the number four, Iowa, Turek for Iowa.com. Uh, we are not taking any corporate PAC money. We were relying off of individual donors. And so if people all around the country hear this, please support. We really can, we can win this race and we can not only change the state of Iowa, we can change this country. And we can once again have in the U.S. Senate someone from Iowa that is fighting for the people like we did for so long with my political hero, Senator Tom Harkin. We can do it, folks. Well, Josh, great to meet you. Thank you for coming. Yeah, thank you for having me. Best of luck at the campaign. That's our show for today. Thanks to Josh Turek for coming on. Dan and I will be back with a new show on Friday. If you want to listen to Pod Save America ad-free and get access to exclusive podcasts, go to crooked.com slash friends to subscribe on Supercast, Substack, YouTube, or Apple Podcasts. Also, please consider leaving us a review. That helps boost this episode and everything we do here at Crooked. Pod Save America is a Crooked Media production. Our producer is Saul Rubin. Our associate producer is Farrah Safari. Austin Fisher is our senior producer. Reed Churlin is our executive editor. Adrian Hill is our head of news and politics. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Matt DeGroat is our head of production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Haley Jones, Ben Hefcoat, Mia Kelman, Carol Pellaviv, David Tolles, and Ryan Young. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East. you