The Rest Is Science

What Day Is It, Really?

48 min
Dec 30, 20254 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

This episode explores the history and mechanics of timekeeping, from Pope Gregory XIII's 1582 calendar reform that skipped 10 days, to the debunked "phantom time hypothesis" claiming 300 years were fabricated, to modern atomic clocks that measure time with unprecedented precision. The hosts discuss how standardization of time became necessary only when humans needed to coordinate across distances via ships, trains, and eventually global systems.

Insights
  • Calendar and timekeeping systems are human constructs created for administrative and coordination purposes, not natural phenomena—the Gregorian calendar was adopted primarily to fix Easter calculations and required centuries for global acceptance
  • Scientific evidence (dendrochronology, tree rings, solar eclipse records) definitively disproves conspiracy theories about missing centuries, demonstrating how multiple independent data sources validate historical timelines
  • The shift from Earth-based timekeeping (solar observation) to atomic clocks represents humanity's transition from following natural rhythms to imposing artificial precision, with consequences for future interplanetary exploration
  • Time standardization was driven by practical transportation needs—maritime disasters from navigation errors motivated the search for accurate timekeeping, and trains later necessitated time zones
  • Earth's rotation is slowing at 1.7 milliseconds per century, meaning atomic clocks and planetary rotation will eventually desynchronize, requiring leap seconds and eventually fundamental rethinking of timekeeping for space exploration
Trends
Growing tension between atomic precision and natural planetary cycles as timekeeping becomes increasingly divorced from Earth's actual rotationHistorical revisionism and conspiracy theories (phantom time hypothesis) being systematically debunked by interdisciplinary scientific methods combining dendrochronology, astronomy, and historical recordsStandardization of global systems driven by transportation and coordination needs—pattern likely to repeat with space exploration and Mars colonizationShift from local/regional time systems to globally coordinated atomic time, with future need for interplanetary time standards as space travel expandsRecognition that human-created systems (calendars, time zones, leap seconds) are temporary solutions to managing the mismatch between human activity and planetary mechanics
Topics
Gregorian Calendar Reform and HistoryPhantom Time Hypothesis and Historical Conspiracy TheoriesDendrochronology and Tree Ring DatingAtomic Clocks and Cesium-133 OscillationMaritime Navigation and Longitude ProblemTime Zones and Railroad StandardizationLeap Seconds and Earth Rotation DecelerationSolar Eclipses and Historical Record ValidationCouncil of Nicaea and Easter CalculationJulian vs Gregorian Calendar DriftInterplanetary Timekeeping and Mars Day LengthHolocene Calendar ProposalTidal Forces and Earth's Slowing RotationMicrowave Frequency and Atomic ResonanceHistorical Record Verification Methods
People
Pope Gregory XIII
Instituted the Gregorian calendar reform in 1582, skipping 10 days to correct Julian calendar drift and align Easter ...
Julius Caesar
Introduced the Julian calendar in 45 BC, which assumed 365.25 days per year but was off by 11 minutes and 14 seconds ...
Roger Bacon
Medieval scholar who warned the Pope in the 1200s that calendar drift would eventually move Easter to summer if not c...
Heribert Illig
Proposed the phantom time hypothesis in the 1990s, claiming 300 years (614-911 AD) were fabricated by the Catholic Ch...
Pope Sylvester II
According to phantom time hypothesis, allegedly wanted to reach the year 1000 and fabricated centuries of history to ...
Charlemagne
Historical figure whose existence phantom time hypothesis claimed was fabricated during the supposed missing 300 years
Jonas Kepler
Astronomer who noted Protestants would rather disagree with the sun than agree with the Pope regarding calendar reform
James Maxwell
Physicist who theorized in the 1870s that atoms could serve as perfect clocks due to their stable, identical properties
William Thomson
Scientist who worked with Maxwell on early atomic clock theory in the 1870s
Quotes
"Protestants would rather disagree with the sun than agree with the Pope"
Jonas Kepler (referenced by Han Fry)Mid-episode
"Time is how we divide up the sequence of events in our lives. But the word time might come from a root word for smoke—something you can't quite grab onto, but you keep trying to hold on to"
Han FryNear end of episode
"We stopped looking at the position of the sun and sunrise and sunset. We started to say, let's measure time more accurately than you guys are"
Michael StevensMid-episode
"The way that we know what time is is that we do it via email"
Han FryAtomic clocks discussion
"If you go to Mars, a day on Mars is 24 hours and 36 minutes. Every few months, they're a day off. One of the biggest crises we're going to have as an interplanetary species is that we will be segregated by what time we think it is"
Michael StevensLate episode
Full Transcript
This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. Dinosaurs walked the Earth 180 million years ago. But you know, cancer was part of their story too. Scientists have found tumors in ancient fossils. Well, that is a part of the reason why cancer is a big part of our story, right? It's the other side of evolution. It's the most complex disease that we face. There are more than 200 types of cancer in total, each with distinct characteristics, challenges and mysteries. And that complexity demands scale. Cancer Research UK is the world's largest charitable funder of cancer research, with more than 4,000 scientists, doctors and nurses working across more than 20 countries in the search for answers. And then, sharing their discoveries beyond borders. And the impact of this collaboration is clear, because over the last 50 years, the charity's pioneering work has helped to double cancer survival in the UK. That is more people who are living longer, better lives. Bossils can show us the past, but research is shaping the future. And for more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, breakthroughs and how you can support them, visit cancerresearchuk.org-forward-slash-rest-is-science. Welcome to the Rest Is Science. I'm Professor Han Fry. And I am Michael Stevens, creator of Vsauce on YouTube. Hey, Happy New Year, Michael. Okay, are you teasing me? Why? Is it really a new year? Is it really 2026? Like, are we sure people have been counting without missing, you know, a day or a year here or there? We may have been lied to about what time it is. And that is what we're going to be talking about on this episode. We are going to look at days that never happened, centuries that disappears. And whether or not we have been keeping count. All right, so let's begin by talking about what day everyone says it is. Like, we pretty much all agree. It's the 2020s, according to the Gregorian calendar. And that was decided for us in 1582 by Pope Gregory the 13th. Unlucky 13 if you ask me. It's quite a lot of Gregory to have happened since the year, year 0. Or I guess the year 1, because the number 0 really wasn't in regular usage until Shakespeare was walking on the Earth. That's true, but not even then, because in the year 1, Jesus hadn't made Peter the first Pope yet. So, right, like the Gregs are busy. The Gregs busy. Okay, but why did Pope Gregory decide that this was the calendar that everybody should have? Okay, let's do the long and short of it. And please pop in and help me because I'm not completely up to snuff on my Greggs. But before the Gregorian calendar, a lot of Europe was using the Julian calendar. And this calendar had started in the year 45 BC. Okay, and it was pretty good. I'm sure you've got a lot of criticisms. And it shows. Okay, the Julian calendar assumed that there were 365 and a quarter days in the year. You're absolutely right. I've got criticisms because that is out. That is out for how long it takes for the Earth to actually rotate around the sun by 11 minutes and 14 seconds every single year. Burned. Oh, Julius, you idiot. You idiot. 11 minutes off. And yeah, what was really relevant to them at the time wasn't exactly the astronomical year, but the tropical year, the time between the equinoxes. That was something that you could measure very easily from Earth. When is the day and the night the same length? Okay, and that would happen twice in a year. And they tried to make the organization system work, but because in reality, a tropical year is 365.242 two days, it wasn't quite right. And the Julian calendar was off by a little bit of time. I think it added in too many leap days as well. So by the year 1582, the equinox was not happening on the day that it should. Should. Who says should? Well, the astronomers care quite a lot because the equinox or equinox, depending on which side of the Atlantic you haven't been from, it's the moment when the sun crosses the equator. Right? That moment where the two of the Earth and so on, it's that moment. And I mean, maybe if you're not an astronomy, you wouldn't care that much, but the Catholic church themselves, they also really cared about this because Easter is set as the first Sunday after the first full moon, after the spring equinox, which they said was the 21st of May. But they kind of came a point. I mean, hundreds of years before Pope Gregory came along, where this day was slipping further and further backwards in time because, okay, it doesn't sound like very much if you're only 11 minutes, 14 seconds or whatever it was out every single year. But if you are, you know, if you're doing that every single year, it means that by two years in, you're 22 minutes behind, you know, three years in, you're 30 minutes behind, it starts to compound these errors. So even by the 1200s, the astronomers were like, guys, you know, this equinox is like, it's getting further and further away. And then there was one guy called Roger Bacon who wrote this big document, sending it to the Pope, begging them to change the calendar and was like, eventually Easter is going to be a summer holiday. You need to sort of do something about this. Yeah. And that might not have been a problem. You know, I think people like Bacon were upset with Easter shifting throughout the year. But also in the year 325 AD, the Council of Nicaea got together to try to figure out some of this stuff. I mean, they got together to figure out what Christianity was. And determining when Easter should be was one of the problems. And there was a lot of fights about whether they should continue to follow the Jewish lunar calendar or not. And they never decided when Easter should be. I mean, they didn't even decide it should be on a Sunday back then. All they did is that they said it is hereby decreed that the Vernal Equinox, the spring equinox must happen on the 21st of March. So they started dictating to the stars in the moon. They dictated that. And they also set this really important rule for all Christians, which was that Easter had to be celebrated simultaneously worldwide by all Christians. So you they needed to standardize how they named and numbered the days because they all had to choose the same date. And by the time of Pope Gregory in 1582, Gregory the 13th, one to respect the Greggs, by his time, the Vernal Equinox was happening not on the 21st of March as decreed by the Council of Nicaea, but instead on March 10th. So something had to be done. What did he do then? Well, he decided, screw it. We're going to just jump 10 days forward and we're going to rejigger the algorithm of the calendar, name it after myself. It's going to be better. We're going to do leap days every four years, unless the year is divisible by four and a hundred. I mean, it's a kind of a whole complicated system that we still use this today because it's okay. It's better than the Julian calendar. And this is how they get around those 11 minutes, right? It's that we have leap years every four years, but with a twist. So for years, divisible by a hundred, it's not a leap year, unless it's also divisible by 400. So 1900 wasn't a leap year, but 2000 was. And that's essentially how they do the mass, how they manage to keep the calendar in sync with the Earth's orbit. That's right. And so on the 4th of October, 1582, the next day should have been the 5th of October. Pope Greg was like, nope, it's the 15th of October. Psych. And unlucky. If you're glad to say so on the 10th, isn't that unlucky? So I always love to, if I don't know, historical answer, I always say, oh, I think that happened on October 7th, 1582. And everyone's like, really? And they look it up and they go, there never was a 7th of October 1582. He's a wizard. And I'm like, guilty. He also didn't change the actual days there, right? Didn't he? He said, okay, the date is changing, but even though it was a, I don't know, a Tuesday, tomorrow is still going to be a Wednesday. Yeah, it was a Thursday. October 4th, 1582 was a Thursday. And the next day was Friday, October 15th. And so if you're ever like feeling bad on a Monday, just think that if it hadn't been for the Pope, it would be Friday. And this is why I'm late all the time, right? Because it's actually Tuesday right now. Exactly. Whatever day of the week you're listening to this. We are still living in a world reverberating with the consequences of this 13th Greg. The thing is, this old Greg, old Greg the 13th, I mean, this is the Catholic Church, this is a point where they are extremely powerful, but not everybody in Europe in particular is underneath the Catholic Church. And the Protestants in particular were very suspicious of this. They thought, they thought that actually this was a trick that the Catholic Church were pulling to make it so that the Protestants celebrated Easter on the wrong day. And therefore would dam their souls to hell. It was just a mean trick. And the astronomer, Jonas Kepler, he said that Protestants would rather disagree with the Sun than agree with the Pope. I think it's probably fair to say that Catholics and Protestants, not the best of friends, Michael, but maybe we'll leave that one to the rest of history, shall we? As far as I'm concerned, there were some other people who were who were really worried that Catholics were trying to steal time so that they could live longer. And different countries adopted it at different times. So Poland, they were like, okay, we're going to do whatever Pope Greg says, we're happy with this. They adopted it almost immediately. But their neighbor, Prussia at the time, they took another 30 years to decide that they were going to adopt it, which meant that if you lived on the border, you could send a letter from Poland on October 15th, and it could arrive in Prussia or on October the 6th. I mean, because all of this confusion is funny, but it makes sense. I mean, imagine if tomorrow, Donald Trump said, that's it, I'm changing the calendar. Year zero is now my birthday. It's actually the year 79, like I can't wait for the year 80 happy new year. Not everyone would go along. There would be all kinds of resistance. And yeah, it took the Gregorian calendar centuries to finally get adopted. I mean, technically Saudi Arabia didn't even accept it until 2016. Well, I think the Ethiopian Orthodox Church still hasn't. Their calendar uses one that is about seven to eight years behind the Gregorian calendar. Yeah, and good for them. They think it's 2018 at the moment, which means someone should really warn them about what's coming in 2020. Yeah, right. So I mean, that actually, that joke actually gets at two very different kinds of time. There's physical time, the tapestry on which events occur in, and then there's also organized human standardized time that is a series of languages and words that describe and name them. And so, you know, I've always joked that if like Jesus had been born 25 years later, in sync would have been the hottest band of the 70s. And that also toys with the fact that there's time, which is the order, the chronology of events, and then there's what number we give them. And yeah, we're still all kind of like using multiple calendars. I don't want to date this episode really specifically, but it is what the 10th of December. But if you're still using the Julian calendar, it's only November 26th. I do often wonder also whether our perspective on the year would be very different if we had decided instead of tying it to the birth of Jesus, but had tied it to the beginning of human civilization or the agricultural revolution or whatever it might be. Like I think that if we were living in the year, 125,782, you know, looking back to say the Second World War or even, you know, things that happened in the Middle Ages, it would feel like that it would feel like much more present than they do at the moment. Well, I like the Holocene calendar proposal, which is that we just add 10,000 years. So right now, it's actually the year, 12,025. And that one, instead of starting at the birth of Jesus for the positive integer years, we start at the end of the last glacial recession, which is really when humanity started to kind of be the dominant force of life changing Earth. I think it makes you feel more connected to your ancestors in a lot of way, actually. Just that tiny subtle change of adding a one to the beginning of the year. Yeah. And the change of not putting BC on years so that it seems like an alien world. If instead Aristotle was doing stuff in the year 8,000 and we were in 10,000, it would still feel like we were more contemporaneous. Right? Yeah. Yeah. Which in a lot of ways we are. We are. Yeah. I mean, not to get too far off field, but like we're still living in the Stone Age. I mean, our world is still made out of things that we find in rocks, concrete, steel. Like we have not actually moved on. Oh, Silicon, that's still a stone. It's sand, you guys. It's sand. We are still Stone Age people. We were never modern. Like let's get over it. I mean, lucky for us that it turns out you can do quite so much with sand. We probably wouldn't go as far if you needed gold in order to build computers. Oh, man, imagine that. I think it's really nice. It's going to be a lot of happen. It's actually almost weirdly lucky that it is really lucky, isn't it? But so it's so easy to make computers out of the dirt all around us. Maybe even suspiciously lucky. So suspiciously. So it's suspiciously lucky. We'll do that one for another episode, shall we? Here's something else that's suspicious. We need to talk about Pope Gregory the 13th again. He added 10 days to the calendar. He jumped 10 days forward because that's how far the Julian calendar had drifted off of the actual motions of the earth and the sun. But if you do the math from 45 BC until his time 1582, it all should have been off by not 10 days but 13. So what happened? Well, in the 90s, this guy named Heribert Illig, great name, by the way, started to put together a hypothesis that he called the phantom time hypothesis. And the idea is that the Pope was off because the Pope's had lied to us about what year it was, that there were three missing centuries, which accounts for those three days that they didn't have to add on. Isn't thou shalt not lie? One of the 10 commandments. Yeah, right. Or maybe not right because we need to investigate this phantom time hypothesis a bit more. I'll tell you some more of the details. So according to Illig's theory, the years 614 to 911 never happened. Okay, they were completely fabricated because at the time, Pope Sylvester the second not only wanted that putty cat, but also wanted to rain during the year 1000. So they said, let's just fudge the numbers. It's not we're not in the 600s. Oh my gosh, you guys, it's almost the year 1000. Ha ha. And they fabricated all of the history that today, we are taught happened in those three centuries. That means Charlemagne never existed. That means that the Carolinian period was a complete fabrication. They just made it all up to trick everyone into thinking that it was the year 1000. Hold on, so it's the idea that the Catholic church went and created all of these original sources. I mean, Charlemagne's essentially fanfiction. Is that what we're saying? Yeah, constructed, put in place. Wow. Okay, that's, I mean, that's quite a bold statement. Are they doing that on the basis of just thinking that Pope Sylvester was really into branding of wanting to hit the year 1000? Yes, yes. And I think also just a suspicion of authorities that if they could do something dastardly like this, they would. And Illig's only evidence really was the aforementioned 10 days jumping forward when it should have been 13. And also the kind of vague like hand wavy, I mean, can you even name something that happened in the year 700? There aren't a lot of historical records from that time period. And he was like, well, that's because it's all made up. So the idea then is that the dark ages are kind of like dark matter. Like it's just sort of a bit of a kind of shady, unknown region. You just just give it an even move on. That's a really good analogy because it's like, I mean, it happened in that the events they say happened matter. It has an effect on us, but you can't see it. You can't interact with it because it never physically happened. Now, unfortunately, because it would be very funny if it was the case. It'd be like the greatest lie ever told. Illig's theory never got very popular for a few reasons. First of all, the Gregorian calendars 10 day jump forward instead of 13 is easily explained by the fact that the Julian calendar had not remained untouched since 45 BC. The council of Nicaea adjusted it a little bit and that completely answers that problem. Well, there's other ways too. I mean, like science steps in to really help us out on this one because there is, there's an area of research, it's called dendocronology. It's like super fascinating. The idea is that you chop down a tree, it has tree rings. You get one tree ring a year. The reason for that is because of the seasons. The way that as a tree grows, it grows faster and slower depending on the conditions that are surrounding it. If it is warmer, you get more growth or get a faster growth. You get a wider ring. If it's cold, you get it narrowing, which is what happens over winter. But it also changes depending on whether there's a lot of rain for one year, also how much sunlight there might be. What you can do is you can take two trees that have existed in a similar place. When you cut them down, there is a way to cross compare those tree rings and see the same pattern of growth appear in both of them. Maybe one tree is born 50 years after the other. But you can work out a sort of daisy chain them as it were, work out where the overlap is and where one tree out survived another. What scientists have done is they've managed to do this really successfully. With trees all across Europe, also in America as well. German pine is amazing at this. You get really, really old German pines. But also in the bog lands of Ireland, which is where my family are from, the bog people. I didn't know that. We are absolutely right in the centre of Ireland and the heart where the peat bogs are. You get this semi-fossilised Irish oaks in there, which can go thousands of years old. Using this exact same technique with modern oaks that are around now and then all the way back, you can daisy chain this so that we have basically an unending record of the climate of a particular region that goes back over 10,000 years. Now that on its own doesn't tell you anything about what year the church were calling it. Yeah. But what you can do is you can go into a building that is, say, built in the year 800 AD, right, or a thousand AD, whatever it might be. And if there is oak timbers in there, they can be analysed and slotted into this timeline that we have about what was happening in the climate of the world. And every time you do that, they slot in exactly without those 300 years that are missing. There's kind of more evidence for this because in 536 AD, there was this gigantic volcanic eruption in Iceland. It was so bad that across Scandinavia, crops failed, people abandoned villages. You find all of these hidden gold in parts of Scandinavia, which around that time, they think that people were making offerings to bring the sun back because the volcanic ash was so dramatic. But you see this scar effectively inside of the rings of trees all across the region. But you also, of course, if the sun gets blacked out by a volcanic ash, there's also this written record of it. Monks are writing about this. People are writing about the villages being abandoned. And it all ties up exactly. I mean, if these 300 years really were missing, then the tree records and the written records would be out by 300 years. But we know that they're not. I didn't know about that. That's beautiful. I love that the earth can hold us accountable. I had heard about the problems of solar eclipses, that there have been all these reports of solar eclipses at certain times, and they all line up exactly when they should, with this, specifically, this 297-year gap, that the phantom time hypothesis says didn't happen. Unfortunately, it looks like it did. Because you could wind back the clock with the simulations that we have of the solar system now and work out precisely the day that solar eclipses happened in the past. And I love to imagine, I mean, I sort of, this is one of my hobbies, basically, is to imagine when you had an event like that before we really understood what was going on in the sky, how unimaginably terrifying it must have been to be like, okay, everybody, today, the sun disappeared for like a few minutes. And then it came back, what on earth does it mean? I know. And you better believe that people were writing about that. In between all the plagues and the murder and stuff, there was lots of people writing about those solar eclipses. It must have been so terrifying because when a solar eclipse happens now, it terrifies me. It's just such a big event that I cannot stop. Like, I'm very much a person who's grown up in a society where I can press pause and I can decide when I do what. And yet, the eclipse is going to happen whether I want it to or not, whether I'm ready or not. And I've been visiting like every eclipse that I can. And I get so anxious just before it happens. It's a very scary thing that these two things that are bigger than I can even imagine are about to do something. And it's going to happen when it happens. But imagine not even knowing that it was going to happen or how long it would go on or what it meant. Yeah. And that then being used is proof that the Catholic Church were telling the truth all along. Imagine that on top. Imagine that cherry on top. Maybe the sun and the moon in the trees are actually in cahoots with the Catholic Church. I like how you're thinking. The tree of knowledge, more like the tree of ignorance and lies. Okay, I'll tell you what. We'll agree for now on what day it is. That's fine. But as for what time is, I mean, that's where stuff gets messy. Join us off to the break. This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. Radio therapy is over a century old, but it is still changing. Cancer Research UK helped lay the foundations of radio therapy in the early 20th century and has driven progress ever since. Radio therapy remains one of the cornerstones of cancer treatment today. Every year, millions of people worldwide benefit from cancer research UK's work to make it more precise. Scientists are still refining how radiotherapy is delivered. And one example is an experimental treatment called flash radiotherapy, which delivers radiation in fractions of a second up to a thousand times faster than standard radiotherapy. An early studies suggest that speed could make a real difference. Flash radiotherapy may cause up to 50% less damage to healthy cells. But scientists don't yet know why healthy cells seem to be spared. So Cancer Research UK are working to answer that. Understanding it could be key to reducing the future. For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research and breakthroughs, and how you can support them, visit cancerresearchuk.org forward slash The Rest Is Science. This episode is brought to you by Thriver. Most of us tend to think of blood as something slightly finical, linked to illness or bad news. But in reality, it has been quietly keeping a record of what's going on inside our bodies. Almost like a biological diary. It holds clues about how everyday choices shape our health, sleep, stress, food, movement, and without access to that information, staying healthy can feel more complicated than it needs to be. Thriver is a proactive health platform that lets you check in from home using regular at-home blood testing with clear guidance to help you understand what your body is telling you. That sense of clarity changes how health feels. Instead of juggling advice, rules, and trends, you get a simpler sense of direction, what looks consistent, what's shifted a little, and what's actually worth paying attention to. It just makes health feel calmer and simpler to think about day to day. Head to Thriver.co to get started. That's THRIVA.co. And use code TRIS for 20% off your first test. Welcome back. We are today asking when is today? Is it today? When is it really? What time even is it, Michael? That's where we're at today. Think about new years, right? There's sort of nothing cosmological, nothing agricultural, nothing seasonal about the reason why it's got to be the first of January. It's just sort of a collective lie that we've all bought in on it. But why? I actually have no idea why January 1st was chosen to be the beginning of the year. It comes back to the Romans. So the original Roman calendar, they actually only had 10 months, they started in March. Not some more month system. I like that. But this is still there. So October, the 8th month, November, the 9th month, December, the 10th month, and then they just never bothered with January, February because they were like, it's dark, there's no crops. Don't worry about it. It's just, you know, get through it, get through it. That makes sense. Also, this is a reason why you've got 31 and 30 days because odd numbers were lucky that they preferred odd numbers. I think of sort of Roman numerals. You kind of wanted a little stick in the end. So they were sort of like, oh, just sprinkle some odd numbers through these 10 months. Then in about 713 BC, they were like, okay, maybe we'll count these extra ones. This extra bit of time, we'll add in January and February. And then in 153 BC, I agree with you about the calendar. Let's call it in year 9000. Thank you. Holocene calendar. I love it. 9,847. That's the one it went up in. Wow. You should be a math professor at Cambridge. You know what? I might just consider it. Thank you. Anyway, so this is the Roman Empire. There's the days that we're in. It's all kicking off in Spain. Spain are revolting. There's all of the stuff going on. And the Romans need to appoint two new consuls. These are the people who order the army, what to do. But they've got the rule that they're only allowed to do that at the beginning of the year. Now, up until this point, the first day of the year was the first of March, the beginning of spring, the beginning of their calendar. But now they're stuck, right? Because it's all going off in Spain. And they've got to wait a couple of months before they are, before it's the beginning of the year, when they're allowed to appoint new consuls. So rather than changing the rule, they decided, let's just change when the year begins. So basically, the reason why it's the first of January is admin. It's admin is the father of this modern holiday. So that's how it happened. Yeah, that's how I happened. Wow. And just like the Gregorian calendar, I mean, now everyone was happy. This is, you know, again, it was all over the place. You had in England, it was the 25th of March. And in France, it was Easter with the beginning of the year. In Scotland, it was, you know, January and Russia, it was September. It wasn't until sort of the 1750s that everyone sort of started to slot into place with this idea that the Gregorian calendar and the first of January was the was the correct day. Yeah, it takes a long time, especially back then. I think as the world becomes more connected, you have to confront the importance of standardization. No one really cared until people were moving around enough that they needed to sort of cross-reference it. I mean, it's the same as time, you know, for most of human history. I mean, it didn't matter what time it was. You get up, when you get up, you go to sleep, when you go to sleep. Yeah, if you didn't have to coordinate what the year was or what the time was with people in a different country, then you didn't need to think too much about it. As long as it worked locally, it was fine. I think that that idea about coordinating with another location. We didn't actually have to worry about what time it was at all until we had ships and trains when it comes to ships in particular. If you, this is strange truth, which is that if you want to know where you are, you need to know when it is, and all. So North and South is easy. You just look at the angle that the sun makes in the sky at midday. So of course, if you're really at the North Pole, the sun will be very low in the sky. If you're at the equator, the sun will be very high in the sky. So you can work out how far north you are. Right, but how far east and west you are. Is much, much, much, much harder. It relies on knowing what time it is relative to a fixed position. So for instance, if you know when it's midday in London, you can calculate when it's midday where you are. If it's two hours difference, you can work out how far around the earth you are. And this was such a gigantic problem for so much of history of how do you hold London time when you leave the city effectively? People had all of these different mechanisms that they used to try and like hold on to working out what time it was they had candles that was, you could melt them down. They had water clocks. They had, even when mechanical clocks were invented, pendulums, they tried to put those on ships and realised that actually they, pendulums don't really work on a rocking ship. And then there was this really big maritime disaster in 1707, this is. I mean, we're already quite far into the idea of sort of naval warships. There's this Royal Navy fleet that's heading home from Spain from Gibwater, in fact, part of the war of succession in Spain. And they had done their calculations based on a clock that was supposedly set to London time, but that wasn't very good at keeping the correct time, could be off by it by minutes a day or even hours in a day. And they did their calculations and they thought that they were really safely in the English channel. They thought they were, they were almost home basically. It was very bad weather as well, but they were actually dozens of miles further west and they thought they were. And so they went a ground on a reef and the whole ship sank in a couple of minutes and nearly 2,000 sailors ended up dying. And this was the big motivator. There was this great, big prize being offered sort of like, you know, 1700s X factor. That's kind of what we're talking about here. Of anybody who could make a timepiece that could keep time at sea, and eventually a watch is created for exactly that purpose. Okay, so wait, wait, these sailors died because they were in the wrong place because they didn't know what time it was. Exactly. Exactly. Thousands of people and this massive disaster, yeah. I honestly don't know this very well. So if you know, tell me, to determine how far east and west you are on earth surface, what would they do? They needed to know the time and then they could say, well, the sun should be here at this time. But if it's not, it's because I've gone east and the difference allowed them to determine how far away they were from say London. Precisely. So you keep a clock taking on London time on your ship. On your ship. Let's imagine it's a watch, right? You keep your watch on London time. And when you're on your ship, you also record when it's midday and at midday locally, you look and see what time it is in London. In midday is like a solar observation. Absolutely. When the sun is at its highest point and starts going back down, you hit midday, you know, it's midday. So then you look and see what time it is in London. And if you are an hour ahead of London, then you know that you must be further to the east of London. Right. Some number of degrees east of London. That was hard to do though, because you needed a really good clock. And the clock that you had, any of the clocks that you had, would run fast and slow or be affected by the motion of the waves. And so you couldn't be sure that it really was midday in London. Your clock might say that it's midday in London, but actually it's half 11 or 1203 or whatever it might be. Which to, you know, it doesn't maybe seem like it matters. But when those three minutes gets translated to miles on the ocean, it can make this really gigantic difference to even track the time, to agree what time it is in London, to measure it precisely is all about humans moving around. Yeah. By the time trains come along, steam locomotives come along, now you can move really quickly across land. And people start to realize that there's like this jet lag thing that you'll get somewhere fast enough that you're hungry. And yet it's not actually the middle of the day when you normally eat like shoot. And you talk to people there and they're like, yeah, no, it's not noon. And you're like, what the heck? Well, okay, we've all got to agree on what time it is. Like if it's noon in New York, but now I'm in, say, St. Louis, we needed to standardize time across cities, across entire countries. We need to invent time zones. And so we still live in a world defined by the consequences of the train. We do, but we no longer live in a world where the time is dictated by the rotation of the earth. That's right. Yes. Because it's atomic clocks now that are the ultimate timekeepers that ultimately tell us what time it is. It is, and it is such a significant moment in human history when we went from allowing the sun and the earth to tell us what time it was to us say, no, shut up. We know what time it is. And we stopped looking at the position of the sun and sunrise and sunset. And we started to say, let's, let's measure time more accurately than you guys are. You know the idea for atomic clocks, they date back to Maxwell in the 1870s. No kidding. Him and William Thompson and they realized that in theory, hold on Thompson, this is the electron guy. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Wow. They only just discovered the atom at this point. Yeah. So phenomenal. But they realized that because this this this particle was like stable, you know, unchanging identical each atom of a particular atomic weight was identical to each other, they realized that it in theory could make this perfect clock because because every atom is in a way this this tiny perfect little pendulum. So lots of atomic clocks at the moment they're made of cesium. And the thing is if you give an atom of cesium exactly the right amount of energy, then its electrons will jump between energy levels at this frequency that is absolutely specific. So for cesium 133, this tick rate is 9,092 631 770 oscillations per second. I mean, big number. Now the way that you do this is you need to give it exactly the right amount of energy in order for that to happen. And so what you do is you take a micro wave, not like one you'll find in your kitchen, it's sort of a much more scientific, perfectly tuned thing. And then you have this like cloud of cesium sort of moving around and you tune this microwave to blast that cloud of cesium atoms with energy. And if you hit it at exactly the same frequency that the cesium atoms like that 9 billion, whatever it was, that's the point where the atoms will start flipping their electrons. So what you can do is you can adjust this microwave until the frequency of the microwave changes the energy state of these cesium atoms and you know you've exactly hit that precise, precise, precise frequency. And that then becomes the tick as it were of this clock when 9 billion, 192 million, 600 day ones, 770,000 of those oscillations have occurred. And then you know that's one second. Exactly. Wow. Now these things are so phenomenally accurate that they would lose less than a second over 15 billion years. I mean, it's like it's mind-boggling, the level of precision that you are capable of getting via this method. That's incredible. I don't know if you know the answer to this, but why do you still lose a second every 15 billion years? Because the cesium atom is vibrating in a way that's independent of what temperature it is or it's orientation in space. But like what's causing it to lose time? Well, check you out the perfectionist, Michael Stevens. One billion. Yeah. Answer for yourself. Okay, now I'll have you with one second of 15 billion years. I mean, the reality is if you're doing this experiment in the real world, you are going to have these variables that you can't control. You have quantum uncertainty, you have maybe background magnetic fields that will interact with the experiment. You have these tiny, tiny, tiny environmental variations essentially that can accumulate over time, but really, really, really not very much. Yeah, not much at all. You know, these atomic clocks, they say you can't have just one because even though it's precise, there's still measurement error, there's still things that could go wrong. So the way that they have this, the way that we actually agree on what time is now, is you have these atomic clocks, there's a number of them that are sort of all over the world. And once a month, they run these experiments when they do something like they'll ping a laser from one clock to another clock via a satellite. Both of those centers will write down precisely the atomic time on their clocks at which that laser arrived. And because we know this speed of light, you can work out exactly how those clocks are in sync with one another. But the thing that I like so much about this is that once a month, all of that data gets collected by a group in Paris who do sort of weighted average and work out exactly what the time is. But they communicate via email. So the way that we know what time is is that we do it via email. Oh, can you imagine like everything gets messed up because that email went into the spam box of some guy in Denver and now suddenly America is like off and France is living in the future. I mean, we may all still be off though. I mean, like we haven't solved it. This idea of what time is we haven't solved it because atomic clocks incredibly precise metronomes are planet, a wobbly rock rotating around our other wobbly rocks in the vastness of our solar system. And you have all of these other factors that are going on too. You've got, you know, magma sloshing around in the center. You've got winds. You've got kind of currents. You've got tides. You've got earthquakes. I mean, it's just, it's jiggling about all over the place. And if you have it, compared to this extremely precise scientific measurement, the two are going to deviate from one another, which essentially is why you need leap seconds to just regularly nudge it back into place. Right. So we're looking at these atomic clocks being like, you're doing a great job. Like, keep it up. But we're going to need you to pretend it's been an extra second. We're going to do a leap second so that the earth can keep up. Exactly. Sacrificing a couple of pieces in chest so your kid can win. That's what the leap second is. It's like us being kind to earth. Yeah. Well, if we figure out a way to all agree on exactly what time it is and we measure the passage of time, the physical flow of time with precision. That's just amazing. We still are going to wind up with new problems as we explore the solar system. Okay. That's when nature rears its head and says, you don't want what you've created. You've built a monster because we go to Mars. Guess what? A day on Mars. The time it takes between mid day and mid day again is not 24 hours. It's like 24 hours and then another 36 minutes. So every few months, they're a day off and communicating with earth when you live on Mars is going to become a much bigger nightmare than time zones are today, where at least we're all still like spinning around at the same rate and going around the sun at the same rate. But Mars goes around at a different speed, goes around the sun at a different speed and it goes around its own axis at a different speed. And so I feel like one of the biggest most immediate crises we're going to have as a interplanetary species is that we will be segregated by what time we think it is and how we live. It's interesting again that it's the fact of us traveling that is going to change the way that we view day and time. That's right. And no amount of physics and atomic clocks will fix the fact that the natural day on Mars and the natural day on Earth are what they are. I mean, I guess the simplest solution isn't the solution, which is that we just, we do ignore the fact that the planets are moving and just go to atomic time. But there's consequences to that too, because the Earth's rotation is different to that on Mars, but it's also different now to what it was in the past. That's right. It's a big sloppy mess. It's a big, sloppy mess. So I mean, the Earth is slowing down. We know that it's slowing down on its axis. You've got this tidal pole that's effectively acting like a break. You can see this in an ancient coral. If fossilized ancient coral, you can count up a bit like tree rings. You can count up how many days they were in a year. These big changes that happened seasonally, but also through night and day. And you can, you can see that 400 million years ago, though, there were 420 days in the year, right? The Earth was spinning a lot faster. And so if you go forwards in time, and you stick to atomic clocks, we're slipping by 1.7 milliseconds a century, which doesn't sound much, right? But the thing is, that's 1.7 milliseconds that the Earth is too slow every year. So, you know, in today, it's, you know, in 100 years, it's 1.7 milliseconds too long the day. The day after it will also be an additional 1.7 milliseconds too long. After 10 days, you're not 1.7 milliseconds behind. You're 17 milliseconds behind. And after 100 years, you've lost 30 seconds, right? Which means that actually if you want to flip midday to midnight, if you want to be celebrating new year in around lunchtime, you actually only have to wait until the year 5,700 AD or 15,700 in the fall of the calendar. So I guess like all of this makes it really clear that time is both very precise as a concept, but also when it comes to living in time, it's very, it's like smoke escaping through our fingers. And I think the ancients knew that because let me give you a little fact I looked up just before the podcast. Time, the word time, TI-ME, probably comes from this proto-indo-European root word for divide. Time is how we divide up the like sequence of events in our lives. But now let's talk about time, the herb that we eat. Do you know where that word comes from? No. T-H-Y-M-E. The herb time or herb as you might say comes possibly, we're not entirely sure, but it might actually come from the root word for smoke. That's why we have Greek words like time in, which is incense, okay, or timeio, which means to fumigate. So maybe time has been time all along, just this smoky essence that you can't quite grab onto, but you keep trying to hold on to. What an excellent point for us to end the episode. So there you go everybody, you're know your new years plans, your new years resolutions. Stop trying to hold on to the smoke everybody, just let it go. Just go with the gregaries. All we have to hold on to is each other, and of course, Pope Greg. Well, if you've got questions with Phil Knies, you can send those into the rest of science at GoHanger.com and check in next Thursday. And sign up for our free newsletter at the rest is dot com forward slash science.