Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov

The Aftermath of Trump's Third Assassination Attempt

30 min
Apr 27, 2026about 1 month ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov discuss the third assassination attempt on Trump at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, analyzing security failures, political violence trends, and the broader societal issues of gun access, social media polarization, and economic hardship affecting Americans.

Insights
  • Political violence in the US is driven primarily by access to firearms combined with mental health crises and social media amplification, not partisan rhetoric alone
  • The obsessive media focus on Trump creates a feedback loop that elevates him in the minds of both supporters and potentially violent individuals, distracting from substantive policy issues
  • Despite high-profile assassination attempts, actual US homicide rates are at historic lows (lowest since 1900), suggesting media coverage distorts public perception of safety trends
  • Economic conditions—food inflation up 8%, farm bankruptcies up 46%, fertilizer shortages—represent the most consequential Trump-era story but receive minimal coverage compared to security incidents
  • Social media's economic incentive structure to promote divisive content and local media consolidation (Sinclair scripts) are root causes of political polarization more significant than any single politician
Trends
Shift from traditional security event designation to ad-hoc security arrangements creating vulnerability gaps at high-profile eventsIncreasing use of AI and surveillance technology (Palantir) for threat detection but persistent failures in connecting watchlist data to real-time event securityRise in school shooting incidents and active shooter drills as normalized feature of American childhood despite declining overall homicide ratesLeft-wing political violence uptick during Trump era correlating with polarization levels, contrasting with historical pattern of right-wing extremismMedia narrative fragmentation where partisan outlets immediately adopt coordinated talking points (e.g., 'ballroom' messaging) rather than independent analysisGrowing disconnect between actual economic data (inflation, farm bankruptcies, lowest consumer confidence in 75 years) and media coverage prioritiesConspiracy theory proliferation around assassination attempts due to information gaps and lack of transparency from authoritiesWeaponization of social media algorithms to create internal enemy narratives rather than focus on external geopolitical threats
Topics
Political Violence and Assassination AttemptsGun Access and Firearm RegulationMental Health and Psychotic BreaksWhite House Security and Secret Service ProtocolsSocial Media Polarization and Algorithm IncentivesMedia Coverage and Partisan NarrativesTrump Administration Economic PolicyFood Inflation and Agricultural CrisisIran Nuclear Negotiations and Middle East StrategyLocal Media Consolidation and Sinclair BroadcastingActive Shooter Drills in SchoolsHomicide Rate Statistics and Public PerceptionFentanyl Overdose TrendsWhite House Ballroom Construction and National SecurityPolitical Violence Data and Threat Assessment
Companies
Palantir
Referenced for surveillance and targeting capabilities that could theoretically identify watchlisted individuals chec...
Sinclair Broadcast Group
Criticized for consolidating local media stations and distributing identical scripts to stations nationwide, contribu...
Fox News
Jessica Tarlov mentions colleagues from Fox who attended the White House Correspondents' Dinner event
People
Scott Galloway
Co-host analyzing assassination attempt, security failures, and societal polarization
Jessica Tarlov
Co-host discussing media coverage, economic data, and political violence trends
Donald Trump
Subject of assassination attempt at White House Correspondents' Dinner; quoted on security and past presidents
Joe Scarborough
Quoted discussing parallels between Trump and Bush/Carter on Middle East conflicts
Benjamin Netanyahu
Referenced as influencing Trump toward Iran conflict despite his historical opposition to Middle East wars
Lindsey Graham
Referenced as influencing Trump toward Iran conflict
Suzy Wiles
Referenced as potentially convening security meeting regarding Trump's public safety and protective measures
Maria Sharapova
Promoted her new podcast featuring interviews with trailblazing women
Ashley St. Clair
Referenced for discussing how marching orders are distributed to right-wing influencers
Thomas Crooks
Shooter in Butler assassination attempt; cremated two days later with minimal public information released
Ryan Ruth
Referenced for attempting to access Trump's golf course in Florida
Ted Kaczynski
Referenced as comparison point for manifesto-style writings of assassination attempt suspect
Quotes
"It comes with a territory, and if you want to do a great job, I really believe that. You take a look at what's happened to some of our greatest presidents, and it doesn't happen to people that don't do anything."
Donald TrumpEarly in episode
"We don't have a monopoly on political divisiveness. We don't have a monopoly on mentally ill young men. What we do have a monopoly on is political divisiveness and mentally ill young men who have access to weapons everywhere."
Scott GallowayMid-episode
"The real damage to America is beneath the surface and that is Americans don't like each other anymore. And we can't agree on anything."
Scott GallowayLate episode
"I would describe this war as operational excellence and strategic incompetence. Total lack of planning objectives, ability to garner partners, articulate the objectives."
Scott GallowayIran war discussion
"Our farmers have no fertilizer. They're not going to be able to get their crops out. People are going bankrupt. They can't afford their regular cost of living. That is the biggest story as of now of the Trump era."
Jessica TarlovLate episode
Full Transcript
Support for the show comes from Odu. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odu. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce and more. And the best part? Odu replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odu for free at Odu.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. Support for the show comes from Odu. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odu. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce and more. And the best part? Odu replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odu for free at Odu.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. What's now being described as this third public assassination attempt. This time it unfolded at the White House Correspondents' Dinner where a 31-year-old suspect allegedly stormed a security perimeter armed with multiple weapons before exchanging gunfire with police. Investigators say he left behind writings, possibly a manifesto, along with messages sent to family members attacking Trump administration policies and hinting at violent intent. Authorities believe top officials, including the president himself, may have been targets. The suspect traveled cross-country, checked into the same hotel as the event was being held, and managed to get alarmingly close, raising fresh questions about security, political violence and how this keeps happening. All of this comes as Trump remains one of the most targeted political figures in modern U.S. history following two other close calls. Let's listen to Trump addressing the situation after he was evacuated from the event. It comes with a territory, and if you want to do a great job, I really believe that. You take a look at what's happened to some of our greatest presidents, and it doesn't happen to people that don't do anything. Yes. What a surreal night in general. I had a lot of friends who were there, obviously, you know, a huge amount of colleagues from Fox who were in the room. Thank God everybody is safe. It could have been absolutely disastrous if he had been able to get onto the same floor as the event. The security checkpoint that Cole Allen got to was a floor away. But you have obviously such intense questions about security at the event, and how this was allowed to happen, even if that checkpoint worked as it should have, which according to everything that I've read, that is the case. Big questions about why the White House Correspondent's Center once Trump was going to be attending was not deemed a national special security event, because you had the first three in line for the presidency that were all there. That happens, like at inauguration or State of the Unions, for instance, and that would mean then that security for the event was transferred over to the Secret Service in totality, instead of them just covering various checkpoints and the people who they are assigned to, you know, whoever's detail, there on. But it felt, you know, to me, I was just home, and we were watching, you know, the second half of Bill Maher from Friday night, and suddenly floods of texts coming in, alerts coming in, and I didn't think it was real, right? I thought someone was just joking around with me the first text that I read, like, how could there be a shooter at the White House Correspondent's Center? And, you know, overwhelmed by thankfulness that everyone is okay, but it seems like there are more questions than answers at this point, and the way that Trump pivoted so quickly to, I've got to have my ballroom, left a bad taste in my mouth, I would say, to say the least. And I want to get your initial reactions before we kind of talk about the brass tacks of what really happened and political violence in this country and all that other stuff, but, you know, what did you feel when you heard this? My first reaction was, this is just another terrible ad that takes down and further erodes the brand America. And that is, you know, we talk about Xi and Putin being the enemy, and yet you don't see them ducking for cover and being rushed out of public events. It just reflects so poorly on the U.S. that we're now in an environment of such chaos and violence. And it's not, you could argue, the third attempt is a lot. One out of three U.S. presidents have been shot at. So this isn't unusual. It's unusual now that this is the third attempt. The politicization, you knew what was going to happen. Some Democrats say that this is because this individual has turned up the heat so much and is such a bad person that this is what happens when you are this course and cruel, which I don't think that is fair. At the same time, blaming the Democrats for calling them a bad president, claiming that incites this type of violence is also bullshit. This comes down to something just much more mundane than nobody wants to address. And that is, we don't have a monopoly on political divisiveness. We don't have a monopoly on mentally ill young men. What we do have a monopoly on is political divisiveness and mentally ill young men who have access to weapons everywhere. This guy was able to cross the country. He wouldn't have been able to if he'd been on a plane. You're not allowed to bring weapons across board or on a plane. And this is just, we have a culture of too many handguns. What's interesting is, and also I just felt shitty, you read the guy's manifesto. Okay, you graduated from Caltech. He is now teaching essentially like an SAT prep course. Right. It's not at Caltech. He's not a professor at Caltech. He is not. No, and I think that's a major misconception that's kind of floating around there about this kid. He also got a computer science master's, which I think indicates that something in his life actually, I don't mean to demean it, but something went wrong from the path he was on, potentially. That's what's unsposedly. It'll all come, you know, much of this will come out. But supposedly they were notified by the family. I read his manifesto and it's just so sad to remind me of Ted Kaczynski's memorandum or manifesto. But like, I don't walk away from this with any sort of conclusions or statements on anything other than too many guns. And it feels like there needs to be a better job connecting the dots. Like, how he was on a watch list, but he checked into the same hotel as the event. How did that happen? I don't, it strikes me that it would be a pretty easy with AI and Palantir's ability to target or surveil citizens, but they couldn't surveil someone on a watch list checking into the same hotel as the event. And the other thing is generally, I hate that event. I was invited last year and I didn't go. It strikes me just so strange that people show up to listen to as flight attendants to, you know, hear a hijacker talk. All he does is get up there and shitpost the media and tell them what fucking idiots they are. And they sit there in tuxedos as if that's some sort of badge of honor to be at this event. I think the event is just so strange to begin with in the Trump era. So how did I feel? My initial reaction to it, I just felt a little bit shittier and I thought it was just a real shame for America. The fact that our administrations don't, you know, can correctly not feel very secure. But I don't have any like inside or wisdom calling away from sometimes things are just shitty. And I felt that way about this. Any thoughts? Yeah, I mean, I certainly second the shittiness of it. Things of the White House Correspondents Dinner is markedly different when Trump shows up himself versus, you know, doing this, not behind his back because he's always watching and commenting. But the tone and the mood was going to be very different. He was going to do his five minutes of jokes. You know, I know he had hired a few comedy writers to help him out with that. But, you know, this only came together in the last few weeks that he was even going to attend. And it was going to be a celebration of the correspondence, you know, free from his watchful gaze, which I think is worthwhile. Some of it can get very sanctimonious for sure. But in general, you know, these are people who work really hard, you know, doggedly covering a completely nuts administration. And to have a night where you do celebrate the best of the best, I think is a good thing. And it's important for morale, especially at a time where you have a president that's calling you, you know, the enemy every single day. And that's what Trump does. I understand that there's an argument for how transparent and open he is compared to other presidents because he will pick up the phone, right? Anyone with his number can call any time of the day or night and he'll sit there and talk to you. But it doesn't speak to the quality of what he's saying or certainly the veracity of what he's saying. I mean, how many people did he tell over the phone that Iran had capitulated that we already won the war or any other version of the truth that he might be spewing at that moment? I am concerned for the implications of what happened Saturday night vis-a-vis the divisiveness in this country. I mean, everybody immediately to their corners, right? The right wing got their marching orders and Ashley St. Clair, who is one of Elon Musk's baby mamas, actually did a video a while ago talking about how the marching orders get sent out to the right wing influencers. And suddenly there was a flood of we need the ballroom, we need the ballroom, we need the ballroom. That was clearly the talking point. And then, you know, you had the left in a defensive crouch saying all the stuff that frankly I say, and if I were going to be on the five today that I would be bringing up that there is nobody out there who is more rhetorically dangerous than President Trump, right? That's just the way it is. And he does it from the most important perch in the world, right? He has the bully pulpit and all he does is bully. I'm curious as to see what actually happens on the ballroom front. It's interesting just on April 16th. So, you know, 10 days ago, the judge who had stopped the construction of the ballroom had ruled that it could continue for the aspects that were needed for national security. And now the DOJ, Todd Blanche, is out there pressuring this judge to accept that the entirety of the ballroom is for national security purposes. And what does that mean then that anything Donald Trump wants to go to becomes an event that has to be done at the ballroom? I mean, that has enormous implications for society. And I'm curious to get your thoughts about the conspiracy theorist side of this because it's floating around certainly on the left that this was staged. And even some factions of the right who have started to question things like what happened at Butler. Obviously, Colin the alleged shooter or almost shooter, I guess he didn't get the shot off, obviously, you know, had a manifesto and it's very clear what he thought it's laid out there in plain English. But it does sit with people and it makes them think like how is it possible that we still don't know anything about Thomas Crooks, the kid that shot Trump in Butler and killed the fireman behind him and injured two more. I mean, that kid who had allegedly no social media footprint, even though he was what, 20 years old, he was cremated two days later. We've never spoken to his parents, never heard from them. They had a high end lawyer that helped them out and suddenly it's a closed case and Donald Trump when he was talking on 60 Minutes with Norwell Donald, all he said is, you know, and Thomas Crooks really smart guy at a 1600 on his SATs. And he likes to talk about how smart he was. Same thing he said about Tyler Robinson who killed Charlie Kirk said always, you know, smart people, they don't like me very much. I was at an event where he actually said that and I'm like, I can understand how people go insane, wondering how it's possible that there are security failures like this that a guy can even get onto Donald Trump's golf course, right? In Florida, that was the Ryan Ruth case. And how do we not know anything about Thomas Crooks and how frustrating that is for people? Yeah, the conspiracy theory stuff. I think it's novel and I think it's entertaining, but I just can't imagine a rationale that the administration would, that it would have to touch so many people that it would just get out that they were putting people's lives in danger. I don't, I sort of just shut that stuff down. I think it's a bit of a distraction. I think quite frankly, I think the White House ballroom is a distraction. Really? It's the way he's gone about it. Like everything else has been shown a lack of respect for norms, but I just don't, I think there are much bigger issues that we should be focusing on whether it gets this fucking ballroom or not. I don't, I don't know. I just think, again, the ballroom is another distraction though. I always find comfort. I really didn't like the media this weekend on a lot of dimensions, so I always take a break and I try and look at data to understand stuff and try to like, you know, ignore your emotions or, or forget what you know as Yoda said. And effectively what you have is you have, most of these assassination attempts are a young man who's had a psychotic break or an emotional break, mental break, access to guns and things and historic act of violence is going to restore their social capital. When people have these breaks, they go after public figures. Donald Trump is on the front of everyone's mind all the fucking time. I think the most accretive tax cut in history would be if in the next presidential election, we elected a technocrat that once a month said something and that's it. Just focused on governance, behind the scenes. I am so sick of talking about this guy. The greatest, arguably the greatest downside from Donald Trump other than the corruption, turning our backs on our allies, nonsensical economic theory, a general coarseness and cruelty and a total lack of respect for women. Other than that, I think the biggest tax is that every fucking night in the near every goddamn dining table around America, they're arguing about Donald Trump. And the reality is when you're on the front of everyone's brain, you're going to be on the front of every mentally ill person's brain. So when you're this presence every day in everyone's life and you are so addicted to attention that you'll do things even knowing they're wrong or they're a distraction from one issue versus the other. It somewhat explains, I think, the multiple why he is on the front of everyone's brain, including some very violent deranged people's brains. The thing that gives me comfort, Jess, is that America's homicide rate fell by the largest amount ever recorded in 2025. As a matter of fact, preliminary data so far in 2025 or 2026, if it continues, we will have the lowest murder rate in the United States since 1900 since they began tracking the data. And while we see this in our feed and we feel terrible out of America and we have all these tick tocks saying people are worried about being unalived, the reality is murder rates are at their lowest ever. And also, I also went down and rabbit hole drug drug overdoses have declined two years in a row, which is wonderful news. So my point is this stuff is upsetting, especially it should be covered because it's the president. It does say something terrible about our society. But when it comes to actual homicides, the nation's safer than it's ever been. Now mass shootings are up, school deaths are up, unfortunately, and that was another reaction. My first reaction was, oh, they know what it's like to be in a high school in the United States right now. One of the things I love about living in London right now is my sons have never had an active shooter drill at their schools. And I like that. I think that is really a symbol. It's one of those things that's a real symbol of a society and decay. But where I pull away from this and find some comfort is actually looking at the actual data here. Yeah. We certainly talk about that data on Fox because that's a bright spot. We should note that the trend started under Joe Biden and it has increased, obviously, under Trump. Same thing with the fentanyl overdoses. But I'm all for giving flowers when flowers are deserved. And I think that the data does matter as for the kids in the school shootings. You know, where is their proverbial ballroom? Right? Like what are we doing to make sure that they are safer? And that would mean that people have less access to guns. And the right is completely immovable on that even though there's over 90% support for stricter background checks, you know, increased red flag laws, and all the things that Democrats have been pushing, and that you can, in rare moments, like under Biden, get some bipartisan support for. I do just want to say something, one more thing about what happened with Trump, because the narrative is this only happens to Donald Trump. And that's just not true. So there were 11 serious plots or attempts on Barack Obama's life, including a guy who fired 25 rifle rounds at the White House. Joe Biden had five, including a guy who was arrested four miles away from his house with an AR-15 and a checklist ending with execute, you know, Hillary Clinton. There was a pipe bomb sent to her house. Actually, the pipe bomber, Cesar Asayek, I think I might be mispronouncing his name, was inspired by Donald Trump and testified to that. So, you know, maybe I'm just preparing myself for when I have to go have this conversation with conservatives. And there has been an uptick in left-wing violence. Cato has a really great chart, which we'll make sure to put into the episode about political violence and the main perpetrators of it. The chart doesn't have 9-11 on it, because it's just too big, obviously. But you see a steady rise in left-wing violence during the Trump era, and that has to do with all the stuff that we talk about, you know, with Trump and how polarizing he is. But, you know, I think you'd be thankful that nothing happened, that everyone is safe. You always go back and rely on the data where you can. If Suzy Wiles is going to convene a big security meeting this week to think about how President Trump should behave and what, you know, what he should be doing when he's in public, should he be wearing a bulletproof vest? I want him to stay alive. I know that's probably something that he doesn't want to do wearing a vest, but maybe it is the right thing to do. But there are a lot of important strands that I guess are connected to this incident that I don't want to lose sight of and just immediately capitulate to a particular partisan narrative about what's going on. If you were to really try and have an honest conversation and look at the data around what is the cause of this. It's not fucking ballroom or Democrats saying things or Trump being a bad president. I think we're going to look back in 20 or 30 years and we're going to say how on earth did we let the cyanide of social media into our water supply? Because every day people are hit with hundreds of notifications convincing them of one thing, that the enemy is within. The enemy is in Russian soldiers pouring over the border. It's not climate change. It's not income inequality or the CCP at the GRU. The enemy is your neighbor across the street who has a sign of a candidate from a different party. And every day social media has an economic incentive in getting you to find a clip where Jess Tarloff makes mincemeat of the other four. Or if you're a conservative, the other four making mincemeat of some progressive such that we just start to hate each other. And the majority of people can modulate that, but some people are crazy and we'll take that to an extreme. But the real damage to America is beneath the surface and that is Americans don't like each other anymore. And we can't agree on anything. And we don't. We want to, you know, it's a total page out of the fascist playbook. Get them to stop thinking about Ukraine and the fact I'm invading Ukraine and get them to hate each other. Convince them that it's the enemy within. And while a lot of it starts on broadcast cable news, it's really social media that monetizes it. And then it's obviously weaponized with firearms against very famous people. But I almost reverse almost everything, engineer almost everything to one of two things, income inequality or social media, coarsening our discourse. I would add also, you know, the monopoly is buying up local stations also has a lot to do with this. So you remember the unearthing of the Sinclair scripts, right? That people who were on Sinclair stations all across the country were coming out every night with exactly the same thing to say. That makes people insane. And it is certainly not informing them. And you're so right that the things also being debated at a lot of tables about Donald Trump are just not the things that actually matter. And you will see, you know, come election day, people show up and they vote their pocketbooks. And that's where you see it come to life. But in the in-between time, we are having far too few conversations about the realities of the average American. And it's been interesting parallel because, you know, on Sundays also lots of new polling comes out, right? At the same time that everyone's discussing what happened at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. But we got average inflation for food and beverages up 8%. Tomatoes 102% vegetables, 90% diesel, 88%. U.S. farm bankruptcies are up 46% year over year. 70% of them are in the Midwest. And the current economic conditions index is at its lowest point in 75 years. So all of this is incredibly important. And we need to be talking about keeping the president safe and gun violence and mental health and social media. But our farmers have no fertilizer. They're not going to be able to get their crops out. People are going bankrupt. They can't afford their regular cost of living. That is the biggest story as of now of the Trump era, I would say. Okay, let's take a quick break. Stay with us. Support for the show comes from Stamps.com. It's staggering that so many small business owners are still making post office runs. I actually still go to the post office. So this is very exciting for us, though I do actually like it in the post office, but I get that it's inefficient. While others deal with long lines, traffic to and from, and an entire logistical headache, you should be able to mail and ship whatever you need when you need it, and you can do that with Stamps.com. With Stamps.com, you can send from your computer or phone 24 seven. No long lines, no low supplies, and it's open anytime. You can print postage on demand and get up to 90% off carrier rates like FedEx, UPS, and USPS. That's awesome. Schedule carrier pickups right from your door and get carrier compliant labels every time. No errors, no rejected mail, no wasted trips. Stamps.com is built for your business. You can send certified mail, get document tracking to confirm delivery and analytics to make sure you know exactly what you've sent and spent. Right now you can try Stamps.com risk-free for 60 days. Go to Stamps.com and use code moderates to get 60 days risk-free. 60 days gives you plenty of time to see exactly how much time and money you're saving on every shipment. That's Stamps.com code moderates. That's Stamps.com code moderates. Support for the show comes from Odoo. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odoo. It's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one, fully integrated platform that makes your work easier. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part? Odoo replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try Odoo for free at odoo.com. That's odoo.com. I'm Maria Sharapova, and I'm hosting a new podcast called Pretty Tough. Every week, I'm sitting down with trailblazing women at the top of their game to discuss ambition, work ethic, and the ups and downs that come on the path to achieving greatness. We'll dive into their stories and get valuable insights from top executives, actors, entrepreneurs, and other individuals who have inspired me so much in my own journey. Follow Pretty Tough wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back. Before we go, in the latest on the conflict in the Middle East, Iran has offered a deal to the U.S. Reopening the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the end of the U.S. blockade, as well as the end of the war with no nuclear component to the deal inside. The proposal, relayed through Pakistan, fails to resolve issues that initiated the war in February, and President Trump is unlikely to accept the terms. Here's Joe Scarborough speaking about the parallels between Trump and other presidents who oversaw conflicts in the Middle East. This president, who, you know, I've had the ability to speak with over the past 20, 25 years, this president, you know, there seem to be two presidents that he brought up the most. One with contempt, George W. Bush, for some reason, really, just all in against George W. Bush, and mainly he'll bring up the Iraq war. He was stupid. He made the mistake after 9-11, and we didn't keep the oil. That's what he said. Then the second was Jimmy Carter, who, you know, he liked enough as a man, but just thought he was so weak in the Iranian Oslo crisis. So here we have these two presidents that have sort of been fixed in Donald Trump's mind through the decades, on the type of president he would not want to be, and him being talked into a conflict by the likes of Benjamin Netanyahu and Lindsey Graham, and finding himself where he's sort of this combination of both right now. That's some harsh stuff. I imagine if Trump has seen it, there will be a post coming, or he's not going to be taking Joe's call. But that cuts right at the heart of this, that there were lessons or doctrines that Donald Trump preached, and he's gone against all of them, essentially. And I was really kind of stopped in my tracks. I saw that Chancellor Umbers was talking to some school kids and said that the U.S. doesn't have an exit strategy for the Iran war, and an entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership. I was just openly saying something like that. And if we are at a point now where they are not willing to negotiate about their nuclear program at all, and this is all just us trying to get the Strait of Hormuz back open, what a colossal failure. Yeah, and contrasting with Carter's sort of in-string with respect to Iran, I would argue that Carter was strategic confidence. I think the rescue mission did make sense in operational failure. The helicopters malfunctioning outside of Tehran, whereas I would describe this war as operational excellence and strategic incompetence. Total lack of planning objectives, ability to garner partners, articulate the objectives. This has made no sense in terms of their ability to outline objectives, apply the resources against those objectives, declare victory. Anyways, we've been here, coordinating with our allies. As Lincoln said, you can't lose a war with the public support. You can't win a war without it, and such that at this point it's impossible for us to win this war. Or very difficult because the public doesn't support it because he's done such a poor job of communicating to key constituencies and allies. Anyways, let's leave it there, Jess. Before we go, a reminder that Raging Moderates is now on Substack. Subscribers get ad-free episodes, a place to connect with Jess and me and the rest of the community, and access to the Raging Moderates newsletter, the Monday Rage out now. Plus, we're going to be doing some live streams that will only be viewable to our Substack subscribers. We're doing them almost every other day. So get joined up, find us at RagingModerates.PropertyMedia.com. That's all for this episode. Thanks for joining us today, Jess. Have a great rest of the week. You too. I'll see you tomorrow. There you go.