Justice Alito
Mentioned in 9 analyzed podcast episodes across 5 shows
A U.S. Supreme Court Justice who has participated in oral arguments across multiple high-profile cases involving constitutional and statutory interpretation, including disputes over presidential authority (Trump v. Cook), pension fund liability (M & K Employee Solutions v. IAM), and corporate entity classification (Galette v. New Jersey Transit). His questioning during oral arguments—focused on practical implications, statutory language, and factual distinctions—is regularly discussed in legal analysis podcasts.
Appears On
Episode Appearances
Bannon`s War Room · Apr 2, 2026
WarRoom Battleground EP 980: Freeing Tina Peters; Fighting Back Against CAIR Curriculums In In Texas Schools
“Appeared sympathetic to originalist birthright citizenship argument during oral arguments”
America At Night with McGraw Milhaven · Feb 25, 2026
Greg Willard on SCOTUS Tariffs, Matt Poppleton on the St. Croix River
“Joined dissent supporting Trump's tariff authority under IEPA statutory interpretation”
The Matt Walsh Show · Jan 29, 2026
Ep. 1725 - I Was Wrong About Online Gambling. It’s Destroying A Generation Of Young Men. Here’s Why.
“Authored 2018 Supreme Court opinion striking down federal sports gambling ban as unconstitutional under 10th Amendment”
Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 21, 2026
[25A312] Trump v. Cook
“Justice exploring factual disputes about mortgage applications and whether gross negligence constitutes removable cause”
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 21, 2026
Trump v. Cook
“Supreme Court Justice; explored factual disputes and whether pre-office conduct can constitute cause”
Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 20, 2026
[23-1209] M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
“Asked about practical problems emerging since METS decision and employer concerns about post-withdrawal liability increases”
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 20, 2026
M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
“Questioned whether post-valuation changes create administrability problems and disparate treatment of employers”
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 14, 2026
Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
“Asked why corporate label matters if state gets no benefit; questioned bright-line rule clarity”
Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 14, 2026
[24-1021] Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
“Supreme Court Justice; questioned why corporate label matters if state gets no benefit; pressed on three-bucket framework for entity classification.”