Justice Jackson

Mentioned in 8 analyzed podcast episodes across 4 shows

A U.S. Supreme Court Justice who appears regularly in oral arguments across high-profile cases. Known for probing questions that examine procedural issues, legal standards, and the scope of what matters properly come before the Court, as evident in cases involving presidential removal, pension fund valuation, and state liability. Discussed in podcasts covering Supreme Court oral arguments and constitutional law proceedings.

Appears On

Breakpoint Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis Supreme Court Oral Arguments U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Episode Appearances

Breakpoint · Apr 10, 2026

Seeing God from Space, Finland Study on Gender Dysphoria and the Dropping Teen Pregnancy Rate

“Referenced questioning in child's case about counselor helping child align with biological body; cited studies on conversion therapy”

Artemis Moon Mission and Christian WitnessGender Dysphoria Treatment Outcomes (Finland Study)Gender-Affirming Care Medical Ethics

View Analysis

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis · Apr 1, 2026

The O'Reilly Update, April 1, 2026

“Only dissenting vote in 8-1 Supreme Court decision on Colorado gender identity therapy law”

Supreme Court ruling on gender identity therapyArtemis moon launch programU.S.-Iran diplomatic negotiations

View Analysis

Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 21, 2026

[25A312] Trump v. Cook

“Justice emphasizing need to establish facts through hearing before applying legal standards for removal cause”

Presidential Removal Power and Statutory LimitsFederal Reserve Governance and IndependenceFor-Cause Removal Standards and Judicial Review

View Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 21, 2026

Trump v. Cook

“Supreme Court Justice; questioned whether case law on removal standards was actually uniform”

Presidential Removal Power and Constitutional LimitsFederal Reserve Independence and Monetary PolicyFor-Cause Removal Standards and Statutory Interpretation

View Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 20, 2026

M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund

“Questioned whether secondary issue of information availability post-valuation date is properly before the Court”

ERISA Section 1391 Withdrawal Liability Timing RulesActuarial Assumptions and Valuation DatesMultiemployer Pension Plan Funding

View Analysis

Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 20, 2026

[23-1209] M & K Employee Solutions, LLC v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund

“Focused on whether secondary question regarding information available to actuaries is properly before the Court”

ERISA Section 1391 Withdrawal Liability Timing RulesActuarial Assumptions and Discount Rate SelectionPension Plan Unfunded Vested Benefits Calculations

View Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 14, 2026

Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.

“Challenged state's use of corporate form as shield; questioned why formal liability commitment wasn't made”

State Sovereign Immunity DoctrinePublic Corporation Legal StatusEleventh Amendment Jurisdiction

View Analysis

Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 14, 2026

[24-1021] Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.

“Supreme Court Justice; focused on state's choice to use corporate form and whether it should shield state from liability.”

State Sovereign Immunity DoctrinePublic Corporation Legal StatusEleventh Amendment Jurisdiction

View Analysis