Michael Pollan: The Hidden Cost Of Constant Distraction (Use THIS Practice To Reclaim Your Attention, Clarity, And Inner Freedom)

This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. The mind is bigger than consciousness. How many percent of what your brain does you're not aware of? It's like managing your body. It's perceiving things in your environment. You're not attending to. We should remember that brains exist to keep bodies alive. Not the other way around. Hey everyone, welcome back to On Purpose. Today's guest is someone that I've wanted in the seat for such a long time. I just found out that I missed out on him last time by a year because on purpose, launched in 2019 and his book that I loved came out in 2018. I'm speaking about the one, the only Michael Pollan. An award-winning journalist, best-selling author, known for reshaping how we think about food, nature, and how we experience the world around us. In his new book, A World Appears He explores consciousness, how perception, awareness, and attention shape the reality we live in. If you feel like you're living in a world where you're living, if you feel like you're living on autopilot and want to live with greater attention, this conversation will help you slow down, see more clearly, and reconnect with what truly matters. Please welcome to On Purpose, Michael Pollan. Michael, it's great to have you here. Thank you, Jay. Thanks for being here. I really meant it. I mean, your work, to me, feels like what science, exploration, and journalism needs to be about. And I don't know where we lost that along the way in our curiosity, our fascination with the metaphysical as much as the material. And I just find it so refreshing every time I read your work, that you're constantly pushing the boundaries. And almost your self-confession of being caught in two minds, or yourself debating these topics, feels so inviting. I feel so different to how I think science is now going about presenting topics as certain and clear and discovered and solved with a full stop after them. Yeah, well, you know, my work is always structured as a quest or an education. I start out with questions, not answers. And follow the path of my curiosity. I mean, if you read my work, you'll see I'm always kind of an idiot on page one. And I was like, yeah, what is this consciousness thing? Or where does my food come from? I mean, these really basic questions. And then the books are really the story of discovery, of learning. And I learn alongside the reader, I really hate books that lecture at me. And most science writing, most science starts with the abstract, the conclusion. I think that's backwards. It's like telling the punchline to a joke before you tell the joke. So, anyway, so that's, I mean, I love that. And what I love about being a journalist is that, you know, we get paid to learn whole new subjects as adults, you know, have a whole new education. And I think that's an incredible privilege. Is this such a thing as a bad question? No, but some questions are more interesting than others. How do you decide? It's just something that if I really care about learning the answer, and I know other people do as well. Like there was when I started writing about food, it began with that very simple question. I realized, I don't know where my food comes from. It's not the supermarket. How do they produce this thing? I remember starting out with a, I wrote a story about the cattle industry. And I wanted to learn how a steak, a prime steak gets to a steakhouse in Manhattan. And I followed it all the way back to a ranch in Idaho and then to a feedlot and then to a slaughterhouse. And I had no idea how many pharmaceuticals were given to these animals, how miserably their lives were when they left the ranch. It was just a revelation. And, you know, if you think about it, it's such an obvious question, where does my food come from? And everyone used to know the answer. If you go back 100 years or 150 years, that would have been a stupid question. Because everybody either was a farmer or a new farmer or went to farms. But our food chain got so long and intricate that we lost track. And we don't know what happens behind the supermarket. So, you know, these are not complicated questions, but the answer is end up being very complicated sometimes. And that's certainly true with consciousness. I got interested in that. Two ways, one through meditation and the other through the psychedelic experiences I had for my book, How to Change Your Mind. And psychedelics and meditation both have a way of kind of smudging the windshield of our consciousness. You know, suddenly we, because normally we don't have to think about consciousness. It's just the water we swim in. You know, but when you smudge that pain, you realize, hey, there is something between me and the world. It's this way, but it could be that way. It's subject to change. What is that? And that, you know, that became the question that drove this new book. Why do you think science has brushed aside research and exploration of consciousness in the way that you've chosen to approach it? What's been the reason? Well, science is now all over it, but it didn't start until around 1989 or 90, which is incredible. That feels so late. This is such a huge phenomenon of our lives. And there are reasons for that. One is it's really hard. It's not called the hard problem for nothing. It was considered disreputable if you were a scientist to work on consciousness. It was a little too vague and woo, woo. You can go all the way back to Galileo. And he made a decision that was really fateful for the future of science, which was we are going to focus, remember, the church was very suspicious of science back then. We are going to focus on objective, measurable third person reality. And we are going to leave to the church the soul by which he meant subjectivity and personal interior experience, qualities also. We're going to do quantities. We'll leave qualities alone. He knew those other things existed and were important, but he also knew he'd be on the churches. He'd be stepping on the church's toes by getting into it. So he put science on this course, which it has followed ever since. It's been incredibly productive. We've figured out all sorts of stuff by using, you know, math is very good for a lot of things. But along the way, we dropped this whole area. And it was only picked up in a serious way. I mean, Freud did some work on it. William James did some work on it. In terms of the physical sciences, it doesn't really happen until Francis Crick, who was the discoverer of DNA, the double helix, with Watson and another colleague, he decided having cracked the code of heritability in life, that now he was going to nail down consciousness dammit. And he was a very brilliant but also arrogant scientist. And he thought the same reductive science that had discovered the alphabet of DNA could discover the source of consciousness. And he predicted it would be a group of neurons in the brain that were responsible. And he called these the neural correlates of consciousness. And he worked on that. And he found correlations between consciousness in certain frequencies of brain waves. But at a certain point, I think he realized that it doesn't really tell you anything. You're still facing this huge question like, how does three pounds of brain tissue, this gray matter between our ears, generates subjective experience, internal perspective, self-awareness, and even basic perception. And we still don't know. And it may not be possible to know. But there's a flurry of activity. And there's a lot of people working on consciousness now. There are 22 leading theories, which sort of tells you the field is lost. And so that's what I delved into. Like, well, what can we say? And I learned a lot of very interesting things along the way. But I mean, I'll give away the fact that I did not solve the hard problem. And what a long way from solving it. Yeah. Why do you think it's important to understand consciousness? When today people may even feel like we don't have time for it. We're just busy at work. We've got unlimited amount of entertainment to catch up on. We're all late on a TV show that everyone else loves. We have families, friends, travel. There's so much. What would learning about consciousness do for us? I think learning about consciousness allows us to be more conscious. I don't think we're as conscious as we could be. If you compare us to any animal, and many animals are conscious, that's one of the things we've learned through this research is that consciousness goes way down. You know, Descartes thought we had a monopoly on consciousness. And it's clearly not the case. I explore plant consciousness in the book, which is, you know, there was a group of scientists who were convinced the plants are conscious. The value of being conscious is this is the space of our freedom, this interiority. Without this, we are zombies. And we should be cultivating this space. It has enormous power to basically allow us freedom from, you know, there are a lot of companies, there are a lot of technologies that want to think our thoughts and occupy our consciousness. When you're on social media, sure you're conscious, but minimally so. You're basically scrolling through and allowing some corporation or some individual or some political ideology to occupy your consciousness. And I think we give up a lot when we do that. You know, the machines have designs on our time. We have a phenomenon now where people are forming strong emotional attachments with machines, with chapats. I think this is an essentially giving away their consciousness. Is that worrying? Very worrying. I mean, we are starting to see, I just read a report on AI psychosis. These are people who have formed stronger emotional attachments with machines than with people. Why is that? Why is it that we can easily form? I think we're desperate for attachment and have trouble finding it in real life. And machines are of kind of a frictionless, AI is a very frictionless way to form an attachment. You know, they suck up to you, right? That's agreeable. It's totally agreeable and it's telling you how brilliant you are and it never criticizes you. I mean, attachment, you know, relations with real human beings has friction, has complexity, has surprise. Whereas if you're doing this with a chapbot, it's basically gratifying every wish you have and telling you you're brilliant. But these chapots have been designed to maximize the time you'll spend with them, just like social media. And this was especially true of chat GPT-4, which was very psychophantic. It just sucked up to people in just embarrassing ways. But effective ways. It convinced a couple people to commit suicide. But it also convinced others they had solved problems of mathematics and physics, even though they weren't physicists or mathematicians. It was kind of nuts. But I think we're suckers for praise. And I think we have a built-in tendency to anthropomorphize everything. You know, you think about children with their stuffed animals. You know, they're alive to them. They speak. They have conversations. I think we're all animists until it gets drummed out of us in school. And then we become these rational materialists. But part of us always wants to go back. And these chatbots give us an opportunity to. So I think we have, you know, we've learned about the mental health problems of social media, which are really serious, especially for adolescents. Social media has essentially hacked our attention very effectively. Attention is part of consciousness. But in a way, it's the most passive and easiest part of consciousness to reach. It's somewhat superficial compared to emotions and attachment. And so now we're moving on from hacking attention to hacking attachment. Hacking consciousness at a very deep level. And I think that's very worrying. And I think we need to, we need to claim our consciousness for ourselves. And you know, think twice before, you know, you're online at the bank or the supermarket. And you, how do we fill that time? We immediately open our phones and we start scrolling. Because we're, we've trouble being alone with ourselves. You know, the, my, our minds can be a scary place in some ways. You know, they're the source of self-criticism and rumination and things like that. But how much better I think was it when we didn't have that distraction? And we're standing online at the supermarket. And instead we're daydreaming. We're thinking about what we're going to make for dinner. We're, we're looking at the, the clothes on the person in front of us. We're looking, we're, we're over here in conversation. We're just present to the world. And if you think about it, we're the only species that can't, that can afford not to be present to the world. I mean, every animal, right, has to be like fully conscious all the time they're awake. Because they may be turned into food. They may be prey for something. And so they have a level of presence that we're giving up. Now, there are ways to reclaim it. Meditation, of course, is a great way to reclaim it. And you know, you're kind of drawing a line around your consciousness when you meditate, right? You're turning off all other stimuli and, and, and being in that space and realizing how interesting and weird it is. You have thoughts that you haven't really thought. I mean, they just poppin up. What is that about? St. and on psychedelics too. I mean, you just, there is this flood of mental material. And it seems ashamed to not be attending to that and to be attending to Twitter instead. Yeah. I, I spend 30 days a year off my phone. And so I just got back from that. And it's phenomenal. What's possible? I'm, I meditate every day. I have a daily meditation practice. I find that the 30 days away is, is different to having a full work day and, and everything else that comes with, comes after my morning meditation. Yeah. And the 30 days I just spend off my phone. It's like, you just feel completely clearer. I feel thoughts connect better. I feel more effective and productive and present. And more aware of nature. More aware of nature. I mean, nature nature has a, you know, a subtle quiet voice. And it gets drowned out very easily by our lives and by our technologies. And so I find when I'm off my phone, and I do, you know, we do a lot of hiking. And we won't take our phone with us. And you can really attend to the, the, the kind of subtleties of nature. And, and suddenly nature speaks more loudly to you. What does your daily meditation practice look like? My wife and I meditate together, not, not very long, 20 minutes in the morning. After we do exercises, we have a long morning ritual. And I find that's very useful for kind of setting, setting the day. You know, it's not always great. I mean, I have meditation. You know, there's a tent, when you do it at the beginning, your to-do list is a threat always. So some days I can really quiet it and some days I can't. And then sometimes I'll do a meditation at the end of the day. I recently did a meditation retreat for the first time. And it wasn't very long. But I was in a, it was a silent retreat for four days. It was only about 30 people. Four teachers was very privileged in, in many ways. And I was amazed how far and deep you can go. And that was four days without phones. Four days without eye contact. You know, we were just in this space of our, of our own minds. And we alternated walking meditation with sitting meditation. And we had dormitoks at night. And two moments where we could address our teachers and ask questions. What was the power of the no eye contact? One of the things you try to do in, in a meditation retreat is not have any need to socially present. The performance we go through socially all the time. When we see people meet people and you're, and these are strangers by and large. And so it just frees you. I don't have to, I don't have to be any way for you. I can just be the way I feel. So it goes along with the silence. And I, you know, I was also at a Zen Center reporting on the book in Santa Fe. Joan Halifax's, you Pia, Zen Center. And there too, there's silence and no eye contact. And she, she articulates it is about this, the pressure we have to be a certain way in, in social situations. And getting away from that is, I found very powerful. We have so many claims on our attention. And to put them aside for a period of time is, is incredibly powerful. I mean, I had some like real breakthroughs during that meditation retreat. Yeah, I was just visiting the monastery that I used to live at in India. So I was just there. And I was reminded of the fact that there's no mirrors there. Yeah. And it's just this unbelievable experience of dissolving into that feeling as you were just mentioning, of not performing. What I'm having to be. And I was thinking about the overexposure we have to our own image today. Image, yeah. Whether it's FaceTime, whether it's Zoom, you're always looking at your box in the corner. Yeah, the selfie. The selfie, the even FaceTime, you have yourself back at yourself. Right. And Zoom, we're spending so much time on Zoom and we are always in that box. And it's probably the first time in history that we've been this overexposed to our own image. It's a good point. So no wonder we think we're too fat, too ugly, too. Yeah, I would never else say anything. It will lead to self-criticism, but I have a question. Yeah. So, I mean, you know, the beauty of meditation, and this is true of psychedelics, is kind of a shrinking of the self and a kind of partial dissolution, sometimes total dissolution of the sense of self, and realizing that our consciousness transcends our self, and that you can put down yourself or transcend it in some way, and still be very conscious. Sometimes even more conscious, because the self or the ego, and I think I use those words interchangeably, it builds walls. It's a defensive structure, finally. It's very useful without question. I mean, it's what allows me to write books, and for you to write books, and do podcasts, get we get a lot done. And as a unit of social interaction, it's necessary. But it disconnects us. It makes us selfish. And so the times I've experienced self-essentially dissolving or going away, it's followed by this powerful connection with something larger than yourself. And for me, I mean, I'll never forget this one experience I had on Silasibon for my book. I had a complete dissolution of self. I just exploded in a little cloud of blue-posted notes. I wear blue a lot. And then the posted notes fell to the ground, and coalesced in this pool of blue paint. And I was no more. I was that pool of blue paint, but that seemed fine. And then I had this experience of merging with something larger, which in this case was a piece of music, that my guide was playing a Bach on a company, Tell Us Wee. And there was no longer a subject object distinction. I just was that music. And it was the most profound experience of music I had ever had. Self is so interesting. We spend so much time self-confidence is important, self-assurance, and we're taught to value ourselves all great. But think about how much time and how many things we do to escape ourselves too. It's a paradox. I think a self-ego can be very oppressive too. It's that critical voice. It's what does the ruminating that you, you know, the spirals of thought you can't get out of. So finding healthy, productive ways to transcend the self or shrink it is, I think, really valuable. I have a good friend who's a colleague of Berkeley who teaches, who studies awe, Dacker Keltner. And he does a really cool experiment with people where he asked people to draw a kind of a stick figure of themselves on a piece of graph paper. Then he gives them an awe experience and it might be video of you, Semity, or something like that on a big screen. And then he asked them to draw themselves again and they draw themselves at half the size. Wow. So experiences of awe are one way to kind of diminish the claims of the self. You know what you're getting with a wedding? Wedding hats. A baby in a waistcoat crying throughout the vows. Themed tables. Orcwood Best Man's speech. The plus one. Hello. People dancing in a circle. Ruined rental suit. Sometimes in life you just know what you're getting, like a luxury bed and a great night's sleep. You know what you're getting with Premier Inn. It's fascinating what you talked about, the paradox of how we're in fact, you're aid with ourself. And there needs to be this focus on the self because that's all we have. And then we want to achieve. And we want to achieve it. And we need to grow and we need to work towards something in order to pursue meaning. Right. And when you're saying actually there's a part of us, you're so right, that just wants to relieve an escape. And I was thinking about the word mantra as you said there. And how man means mind and truck comes from the Sanskrit triate, which means to transcend. And so to transcend the mind is what mantra actually means. Even though now we use it as affirmation or mantra we use as something repetitive. But mantra in its actual definition means to transcend the mind. Where did you find that consciousness lives? Because we believed it lives in the brain, I believe. We believe that, but we have not been able to prove it. The assumption has always been that there is some way that a certain arrangement of neurons produces or consciousness emerges from that complexity. But we haven't gotten too far figuring out how that might be. What we've observed, we know there are correlations between the brain and consciousness. And if you anesthetize someone, they become unconscious. And if you remove certain parts of the brain, you become unconscious. But we haven't gotten very far in proving that relationship. There are other theories that are being more seriously entertained. One is panpsychism. This is the idea that everything is conscious. That in the same way a couple hundred years ago we realized that there was this other force in the world called electromagnetism. And that there are these waves all around us that are passing through us and can carry information, TV and radio waves. Is there another thing we need to add to the stock of reality? And is that psychism or psyche? And that every particle has some in the insipincy bit of psyche. And somehow these little bits combine to form the kind of consciousness we have. It seems really farfetched. It solves the problem of consciousness in a way, but it creates this new problem of like, well, how do they combine? Then there are theories that usually go into the word idealism that consciousness proceeds matter. And that we are sort of pools of individual consciousness in a larger field. There's also transmission theories, which is that again, consciousness is a field that's outside of our minds. And what our minds do is channel it. And we are like radio or TV. In the same way that radio or TV receivers are picking up something. If you look at a TV set, you know the woman doing the weather cast is not in the set. In the same way, consciousness is not in here. It's channeled. And we lighted a certain amount. And there was a French philosopher, Henri Berkson, who developed this theory. And Aldous Huxley actually talks about it a lot. He thought what psychedelics did was open wider the valve. So more consciousness gets in. Because in normal times, we have this thin dribble of consciousness. And that's all we need to survive. But there's a lot more out there. And that's what psychedelics equates you with. You know, it's a theory. Hard to prove. So there's a lot of different ideas out there. And one basic idea is like, you know, can you have consciousness without brains? And there are people who believe that. That you should be able to do it on some people think you can do it on silicon and in computers. And that consciousness is like an algorithm. The brain is like a computer. And you can run that algorithm on different substrates they're called. And it's like a computer, a computer, a computer, a computer, a computer, a computer. I don't think that's true. But that's a very common belief in silicon valley. So this is different from the more religious spirit who are understanding of consciousness being this spark that animates the body. Yes and no. I mean, the religious idea is close to idealism. That consciousness is something larger than us. There's a giant field or pool of it that we pass in and out of. And that, if that were true, it would explain things like telepathy or past lives because time is just a human construct in that idea. And you can go in both directions in the pool of consciousness. Now that I have trouble believing the theory that brains produce consciousness, I have a very open mind. And I think we have to. I don't think we can say with confidence that any of these supposedly woo-woo ideas are necessarily false. I mean, think about what we're learning in physics. I mean, what could be more woo-woo than the idea that two particles separated by light years can instantaneously affect one another? As has been proven now in tanglement, quantum entanglement. So, I think the universe is a lot stranger than we know. What's the difference between the consciousness and the mind? The mind is bigger than consciousness in the sense that it would include everything the brain is doing unconsciously. So, you're subconscious. Probably 90% of what your brain does you're not aware of. It's managing your body, which is a big project. It's perceiving things in your environment you're not attending to. It's picking up on homeostasis. Is my body at the proper temperature? Do I need food? How's my blood pressure? Heart rate? I mean, just incredible what it's doing. It's managing this very complex organism. We should remember that brains exist to keep bodies alive, not the other way around. And they do that by monitoring things and making adjustments. So, that's the mind. It's doing all that stuff. Consciousness is this little tip of the iceberg of the stuff we're aware of. And the interesting question is if we can automate all that, why don't we automate the whole thing? Why aren't we zombies? Why do we need the space of awareness and decision making? The best guess is because there are, for a creature that exists in the very complex social reality. I mean, we are inherently social beings. We need connection and we die without it. You can't automate something as complex as social engagement. You can't automate. Like, you need things like theory of mind, so I can guess what you're thinking and anticipate what you're going to do. And all the little signals that go on in a conversation. You can't automate that. It's just too complex. And also, there are certain needs you have that may contradict. Let's say you're tired and you're hungry. Which should you deal with first? You need to make a decision. And those kind of conflicting needs may be what drive us to become conscious. Because we need that space of decision making. So, that's the best guess. Nobody knows, for sure. Yeah, but I appreciate the openness and the fascinating questions that you ask in the book. Because to me, I mean, I found that so extremely endearing that you start the book going, you may not know more than you know now. And I was like, what an interesting way. And I was like, but I love that because it is the only way we can approach these really big questions that are so far beyond us. And you know, you're extremely humble in the introduction as well. But just your self-confession of just how like, you know, who are we to even ask these questions and qualify to look into it. But I think that is your qualification. And that's why I think you're such a... Yeah, I wondered about that. Why me? You know, I'm not an expert. I didn't know a lot about neuroscience or philosophy when I started. I had to learn a whole new fields. But then I thought, well, I'm a conscious human being who's pretty good at explaining things. And so, so why not me? I mean, one of the conclusions of science so far, which is really interesting, is that, you know, we first approach consciousness with this idea. We're going to find those neurons, you know, the neural correlates. As time has gone on, there's been this general recognition that subjective experience is central to this. So what the philosophers call phenomenology, which is a fancy word for human experience, has to be explored. And that what any individual is experiencing, what's going on in their minds, is relevant to the science. So I thought, okay, I'll offer myself. And I'll bring whatever I can by looking closely at my own experience. That's why meditation, I think, is going to be very useful to the scientists also, because you have a group of people, and I'm talking not of people like myself, but really experienced meditators. And so, you know, I think, you know, I think, you know, that people have done the 10,000 hours, like presumably you got to that number in three years, would have some insight about consciousness. And that's true. There are some interesting experiments going on, where there was one, there's a woman named Kalina Kristoff, who studies what's called spontaneous thought, that I looked at, that includes daydreams and mind wandering, which are very interesting phenomenon. She put experienced meditators in an MRI and told them to press a button when a thought arose. They were trying not to have any thoughts. And she concluded that you can only go about 10 seconds without a thought. But anyway, when people pressed the button, she saw what was going on in the brain at the same time. And the thought arises in the brain. She saw that activity in the memory center, which she was looking at hippocampus, four seconds before the person was aware of it. So, there is a very elaborate and long process before thoughts become conscious. They exist somewhere else and then pop into what we call the stream of consciousness. But that it takes four seconds, suggests that something's going on. Perhaps the thoughts are competing with one another to get into that workspace, that's one theory. But we don't understand exactly what's going on. So, that tip of the iceberg metaphor, I think, is really important for consciousness. There's a lot going on that precedes it. And meditators have, I think, can develop a keener sense of what that is. Yeah, I want to spend the rest of my conversation talking about both meditation and psychedelics. Because I think these are both what you've shown through your work pathways to access to consciousness. Without doubt. And very similar. That's what's going to ask you. Let's start with the similarities. What are the similarities in what meditation and psychedelics allow us as access into consciousness? Well, they both take us out of the, they can take us out of the world we're in and all the kind of distractions. And I mean, there are two ways to use psychedelics. One is, you know, people take mushrooms and they walk out in the woods and they have a profound experience of nature. But in a guided psychedelic experience, you're usually wearing eye shades, you have headphones on. So you are closing off the sensory, the outside senses. So you can go inside, more like meditation. That building of that fence around your consciousness allows certain things to happen. You can really travel. You can talk about it nearly enough. But the psychedelic experience, you know, has a has a has a has a path, has a trajectory, right? There's the onset, you know, the coming on. There's this period of intense, uncontrollable visual and sensory experience. And then there's this long tail. The long tail is a meditation and a really profound one, I find. Because you, I can meditate better in that space than just about anywhere. You've regained some control of your mind. You can decide, I want to think about this. But you can do it in a completely undistracted way. You still can close out everything. So that's one aspect that I think is similar. There is spontaneous thought in both cases. Things are just arising from who knows where, maybe you're subconscious. Memories are coming up. Fantasies are coming up. So there is that just kind of loosening of constraints on consciousness. Just to see what arises. And you know, sometimes in meditation we fight that. But there's a kind of, you know, if a possum meditation, we just openly observe that. You can learn to do that in meditation. It's forcible in psychedelic. You have no choice. It's going to happen whether you want it or not. What do you wish people who take psychedelics would do differently in their approach to taking them? Do it more intentionally. I think it's potentially very powerful. I think that, you know, at different points in our lives, we use them in different ways. And sometimes they're used to just kind of for thrills and to go to concerts and just, you know, groove on nature and things like that. And there's nothing wrong with that. And I know many people who have had really powerful experiences. But I think if you use them more intentionally, they can be incredibly therapeutic. They can teach you things about yourself. It's not that the intention always bears fruit. I've said intentions and then something completely different dominated the experience, which has turned out to be very positive. I remember I went into one guided experience about, I don't know, a year after my father died. And I had the sense that I hadn't fully grieved his passing. And that I wanted to sort of be with him and hear his voice and take his advice and connect with him again. Which happens sometimes on psychedelics. I had my, I took my psilocybin and the whole trip was about my mother who's still alive. And the message was, your dad's dead. Here's your mom. Open yourself to that relationship. Go see her. And the next day was a Jewish holiday. I think it was Russia, Shana. And they were having a dinner in New York. I was in Cambridge. And I couldn't get down because it was a teaching day or something like that. And as soon as the trip was over, I said to Judith, my wife, we're going in New York. And we completely changed direction. So there was a case where the intention didn't work out, but I learned something. And it was a really important lesson that take, you know, don't take your mom for granted. She's still here. Thank you. Thank you for sharing that. That's such a... Yeah. It was... That's such a beautiful experience of something being completely the opposite to what you expected. How does science currently explain that experience? Because that, you know, at least I don't know the scientific explanation and some asking. But I hear a scientist here that go, well, you just made that up in your head. That experience. But like... You make everything up in your head. Yeah. So how does... So how does science go ahead and explain that? Well, there's some interesting work. So I'm very interested in the science of psychedelics and I wrote about it and how to change your mind. I also, with Dacker Keltner, who I mentioned earlier, helped start a psychedelic research center at Berkeley, where I do work. It's called the Berkeley Center for the Science of Psychedelics. There's a couple theories. I mean, one is that there are top-down controls on our consciousness and perception. Most of what we experience is a prediction based on past experience and beliefs. Our senses exist only to correct that. It's a weird idea, but that the brain is essentially hallucinating reality with this error correction, constant stream of error correction. And psychedelics relaxes those beliefs. I'll give you an example. There's a famous psychological experiment called the rotating mask. You've seen it. It's that mask used when the Happy and Sad Theater image and it's concave, right? It's just the skin. And one of those masks is on a carousel and it turns. And first, it's convex and you see it as we normally see faces. And then it turns... You go online and find one of these. And then you turn it and you start seeing the back of the face, which we've never seen in reality. And you will see what happens. Your mind will refuse to see the back of the face and this will pop out and become convex. And that's because the brain doesn't believe faces can ever be concave. And since you were a baby on your mother's breast, you've studied faces and you know they're always convex. On psychedelics, you can see the back. It doesn't pop out. There's research showing this. So what that suggests is that prediction, that this is the way a face has to be, is relaxed. And you're actually seeing more of reality in a sense because the prediction is not accurate in that case. So that's so cool. Isn't that cool? Yeah, that's fascinating. So your beliefs about how the world is are relaxed, which allows new beliefs to form. And it allows more information to come up from the bottom. So that's one theory. Another is that there's a structure, a network in the brain called the default mode network, which is really interesting. And it's in the midline and it connects several different structures, but it's involved with, it was called that because if you put someone in an FMRI and say, okay, we need a baseline, no task, just mind, wonder, think that lights up. It's where we go and we're not dealing with incoming, a lot of incoming or outgoing tasks and things like that. And the default mode connects memory and emotion and a structure called the posterior, single, cortex. It seems to be where the ego is. If the ego has an address in the brain, it's in this network. A time travel is, it takes place there. And if you think about it, self depends on time travel, right? You need a sense of the future and the past to construct, this is who I am. If you let the future in the past go, you sort of dissolve. It also is where we construct the story of who we are. In other words, we have this narrative of who we are and everything that happens, we kind of fit into that story. And all this is deactivated during psychedelics. And that probably explains the ego dissolution that happens on a high dose or often happens on a high dose. So that would be another way that the usual structures, things like rumination, breakdown, and temporarily. And the brain is rewired for a time. And so I assume that's extremely helpful for people who struggle even with overthinking and... ...rubination in particular. And rumination, and that's getting stuck in a groove of thought. And it's often negative. I'm unworthy, I'm ugly, I'm too fat, nobody loves me. People get stuck in these spirals. And by relaxing the default mode network or taking it offline for a period of... You get a relief from that. And that feels really good. And when you come back online, it can change. Same with addiction, which if you think about it, is a form of rumination. It's your stuck. I need this, I have to have this. Yeah, I can't live without a drink. I can't get through life without a cigarette. These are narratives that our ego is telling us. And they're deep grooves. And they get deeper the longer we live with them. Psychedelics gives you a path, a temporary path out that can become a permanent path. And a beautiful metaphor that one of the neuroscientists I interviewed said... He said, think of the mind as a hill covered in snow. And every thought is a sled going down the hill. And over time, the sleds form these grooves. And after a while, you can't go down the hill without falling into one of those grooves. The psychedelic is like a fresh snowfall. It fills all the grooves and allows you to take another path down the hill. It's a beautiful metaphor. Yeah, it's beautiful. I love that. Feel that? Yep. It's winter fading away and the warmth of spring making its way back. Welcome the new season with Etsy and discover loads of fresh finds. Like a pair of gardening gloves to help that new outdoor hobby blossom. Or maybe some porch decor to liven up your space. From the personalised to the practical, we've got you covered with millions of active listings to choose from. Spring arrives in just six days. Chopper Etsy.com and discover your perfect find today. This Easter, switch your phone from Home Mode. Do unlimited data-improve cat mode. So you can post as much content if your idyllic yoga location as possible before embarrassing yourself with another attempt at the first time. Get all the data you need abroad with no dodgy Wi-Fi, no roaming charges, and no nasty bills with an unlimited eSIM from AeroLo. Visit AeroLo.com to switch on holiday mode next time you travel. Check your device compatibility. What's the research that talks about the new season? What's the research that makes you feel like you're a newbie? What's the research that makes you feel like you're a newbie? What's the research that makes you feel like you're a newbie? What's the research that makes you feel like you're a newbie? What's the research that talks about that connection with things like OCD and ADHD? Has there been a lot of research in that? OCD, definitely. I don't know about ADHD, but OCD is, of course, getting stuck in deep groups and patterns that you inhabit you absolutely cannot escape. There was a study done at Yale by a psychiatrist named Ben Calmendi with OCD patients on psilocybin and he got terrific results. psilocybin seems to be really good at breaking patterns. All different kinds of patterns, patterns of depression and anxiety, patterns of addiction, so patterns of thought and behavior. John Hopkins did some really remarkable work with cigarette smokers getting them to quit smoking. It seems almost too easy. I interviewed some of these people for how to change your mind and I would ask them to describe their trip. This woman who smoked for 50 years had this incredible trip. I went all over the world and all through history and I went back to Shakespearean, England and I went to India and I went here and there and I realized there's so much beauty and so much experience in the world that shortening your life with cigarettes was really stupid. Now, I'm sure she's had that thought at other times but the thoughts you have on psychedelics have a particular weight or authority that no other thoughts have. William James called it the noetic quality, the idea that this is not just an insight or an opinion. This is a revealed truth. That allows you, when you say, when you have that feeling, I'm done smoking. I want more of my life. It sticks. It's sticky in a way. Resolutions never are. So that seems to be one of the way. We don't understand why that is. But the brain is particularly plastic during a psychedelic experience and for a period of time after. There's some very interesting research about what are called these critical windows that open. You know how kids can learn language very quickly at age three, four, and five. They have a window for developmental window for learning language and then adolescents have a developmental window for forming social attachments and that's at time when their friends matter more than anything else in their lives. These windows close. Psychedelics, this is the work of one of the members of the Psychedelic Research Center at Berkeley, Gould-Dolen. She has shown that psychedelics can reopen these critical windows and allow people to learn in a powerful way. It's fascinating research. It's been an animal so far. She's done it with octopuses and rats and mice. But now she's starting to work on humans. And if you think about it, it has huge implications for possibly things like autism where the window for forming social connection has closed prematurely. It's one theory. For stroke, recovery from stroke, there's a window after a stroke for I think six weeks where if you do intensive work, you can make a lot of progress and then it closes. Could you reopen that with psychedelics? She's actually testing that right now. Are there any known negative impacts of psychedelics on the brain? Some people have really bad experiences and there have been cases of psychotic breaks. So people have their first psychotic break and they become schizophrenic. Is this a side effect of the psychedelics or is it something that was going to happen anyway? I mean, big, big experiences lead people to have psychotic breaks at certain windows, like in their 20s. So it isn't really clear whether the psychedelics are, I mean, they may have precipitated it but it probably was going to happen anyway. Then the people just have bad trips. They can be absolutely terrifying. And there are people who shouldn't mess around with them. I mean, if you have any risk of schizophrenia, they don't allow you in these studies. Ditto, mania, manic depression, they don't want you in these studies. I mean, this sounds really weird but they're remarkably safe drugs from, by the usual standards. The classic psychedelics, psilocybin, DMT, which is in ayahuasca, LSD, they have no known lethal dose, which is extraordinary. I mean, Tylenol has a lethal dose around 17 pills or something. They're not, they're not habit forming. They're not addictive. There is this psychological risk that people will, who are unstable, will get, you know, still less stable. So they're serious. You have to take, you don't take them lightly, but they have, especially in the context of a guided situation where somebody is with you the whole time, somebody's prepared you for what to expect and then helps you integrate, which is to say help you make sense of what can be a very confusing experience. They're very productive and they may revolutionize mental health. You know, we're close to approval on two of them right now. And whatever you think of RFK Jr. and what he's doing to public health in America, he's very supportive of psychedelic medicine. And there's a good chance that both psilocybin and MDMA will be approved in the next year or so. Yeah, it was about to ask, how is the world reacting the healthcare world, reacting to the inclusion of psychedelics in the way that you say? It's a great question. You know, I wondered about that too. And I remember interviewing Tom Insul, who was a very prominent psychiatrist. He was head of the National Institute of Mental Health. I called him in and I was kind of surprised that when I was writing about it, I wasn't hearing more resistance from psychiatrists, many of whom have treated people who took psychedelics at one point. And he said something that surprised me. He said, you know, the field is desperate for new tools. That if you compare mental health treatment with infectious disease, cardiology, oncology, they have made huge strides in the last 20 years. Actually curing people, extending lives. You can't say that about mental health treatment. We are really stuck. The last big innovation word SSRI anti-depressants and they don't work very well actually. They help some people, but they perform a little better than placebo in head to head studies. And he said, so really? Yeah. Oh, it's it's two points better than a placebo. Now, placebo is powerful when you're treating mental health. But and they have lots of side effects. People don't like to take them. They put on weight. They lose their libido, things like that. He said the field is desperate and open for that reason and that this could be a breakthrough. And the other question I asked him that was he had a really interesting answer. I was like, you know, I was a little suspicious. You're talking about one drugs. Let's say psilocybin to treat anxiety and depression and OCD and an addiction. Isn't that a little too good to be true? It sounds like a miracle drug. A miracle drug and he said he answered my question with a question. He said, what what makes you think those things are all different? So what? They may be products of the same brain, different manifestations of a brain that's stuck. Stuck in grooves, you know, repetitive rumination. And there may be a common denominator and those just may be symptoms. And I was like, that's kind of mind blowing. And in fact, there is. Yeah. There is a study going on at Harvard now Harvard Medical School looking at this question of rumination and psychedelics and see whether maybe that's the common denominator that that psychedelics addresses. Well, I mean, yeah, I feel like with what you're speaking about, I'm thinking about so many of my friends who and my wife's friends are currently struggling with OCD. And extreme forms of it. And I'm thinking, you know, this is one thing they haven't tried. Like it's, or maybe it's not possible in the country that they live in. And if there's so many great studies that are actually showing the benefits, it's almost like it may be worth trying because the other, the other parts are definitely not working. Yeah, I mean, the first thing I would do is look for studies going on around the country, you know, trials.gov maintains every drug trial going on around the country and you can search OCD and you can search psilocybin and see if they're follow ups to that Yale study that might be going on. And the other alternative is to work with a really good guide and see if that might help because it had, I mean, it has helped many people. The Netflix series based on how to change your mind has an episode, the second episode is about psilocybin. And there are stories of people whose lives were just changed. There's a 30 year old there who we interviewed, who had been just paralyzed by it was, it really emerged after the birth of his first child. And he was just so terrified about doing something wrong. And he was, his life was completely paralyzed by OCD and he participated in this trial. And in the course of one afternoon, it released its hold on him. It's kind of extraordinary. It does seem too good to be true. But I've interviewed these people and these stories of transformation are just so powerful. Well, the fact that you said that it's not addictive. And it's not toxic. Yeah, and it's not toxic. I mean, those two things make it feel so much better than everything else. Yeah, no, I think, I think the risk is low. And it's lower still when you use a guide, you know, someone who's, because people do stupid things on psychedelics, people do jump off of buildings every now and then and think that they can fly. And if you're with someone who's staying closer to the ground, who's been around the block, you're very safe. And the risk, you've mitigated the risk to a large extent. What have you learned about consciousness that most changed your view about death? One of the more interesting studies of psychedelics that was done early on was giving them to terminal cancer patients. People who were, had what is called existential distress, they were just terrified of either death or recurrence of their cancer. And over the course of one session, I interviewed people who lost their fear entirely. And the way this happened, it was different in different people. Some people had a vision of an afterlife and they saw where they were going to go when they died. But I remember this one woman had this experience of, again, flying through space and seeing all these things and then going underground. And she said, and then I dissolved in the soil and my spirit was taken up by the plants. And that was fine. If that's what happened, that was fine. She had acquired a sense of herself, not as this narrow little thing that was vulnerable to death. But as this energy, as this set of carbon molecules, that wasn't going to die and would go into nature. It's actually a very realistic take on things, you know, in a way. But to the extent you expand your sense of self, your fear of death drinks, that was the message that a lot of these people had. I'm not convinced that consciousness survives death. I think a lot of people subconsciously believe that. I think consciousness in a way is the word we use for the soul in our time and the whole, it has a lot in common with the soul. That's certainly what Galileo thought. And the soul is indestructible. Right. So there's a solace in that. We, especially as we get older and we sort of feel our bodies falling apart, our consciousness is intact. It seems like it could transcend the body. Does it really, you know, I've learned to be humble enough to say, I don't really know. Near death experience is a very curious phenomenon. As I said earlier, you know, the universe is stranger and more wonderful, literally full of wonder than we know. My psychedelic experiences have, have tempered my fear of death. I would say. Yeah, I've always been fascinated by the work of Dr. Ian Stevenson in cold souls and the near death experiences and past life experiences and always been fascinated by seeing more research in that space because I feel like it's not really been evolved since then. He started this little group at UVA. I've been there and Steven's in a died when I went, but I met some of the other people there. And they have these incredible files on these past life experiences near death experience. We have a lot of empirical evidence that contradicts our usual materialist understanding of how the world works. The way science is supposed to work is when you have empirical evidence that contradicts your paradigm, you have to rethink your paradigm. We're not doing it. We're really like addicted to this paradigm. You know, they should all take psychedelics. That might help. And I wish more research was done on this too. And it's not taken seriously by most scientists, which I think is a shame because I think they should be open and skeptical. That's the whole idea of the scientific enterprise. I do see some shakiness in the materialist paradigm. I have talked to scientists and including people, you know, brain scientists, real, you know, biologists who have come to the conclusion that materialism can't explain consciousness and that there's something else going on. I have talked to biologists and I interview some of them in a world of peers who believe that biology is shaped not just by environment and genes, but that there are platonic forms that endow living things with a sense of purpose agency. That in the same way math has certain concepts that seem to be eternal and platonic in that sense. If you have three angles, it's going to add up to 180 degrees or whatever it is, triangle. That there's something similar governing more of life. This is a very prominent biologist who believes this. So we may be getting close to a time where reconsidering materialism will happen. Certainly physicists are there. They're open to some very seemingly exotic ideas. But the consciousness may have some effect on the world. You know, the double slit experiment suggests that an observer seems to change what happens. I mean, that's kind of mind blowing. So biology has been more conservative because they had Darwinism and that kind of explained everything. But I'm starting to see a little crack in the edifice and it's the study of consciousness. I think that is causing it. I think we look back in 50 or 100 years and realize that when we have another paradigm revolution, that there's something more that the maybe we'll be adding something to matter, to what matter is, or maybe it'll be a whole different idea. What's going to take for that to happen? Because I feel like you said it's happened in place on college. There's at least evolution. We talked about AI. We're talking about the fact that you have machines that can think and formulate it. Well, yeah, we didn't talk about AI. We haven't talked about AI. I think our definition of what is human is going to be is under pressure now in a way that could be very productive and could be destructive. On the one hand, we're learning we don't have a monopoly on consciousness. All these animals and possibly plants and bacteria have some very elemental sense of, I would call it sentience, consciousness being a more complex version of sentience. Consciousness is how humans do sentience and maybe all living things have sentience. That is, that reanimates the world to a large extent and that materialist idea that, you know, aside from a handful of species, the world is dead matter that we can do with what we want. That idea, I think, will be gone. On the other side, we have this threat to our sense of specialness from AI. And I talk in the world appears of people trying to develop conscious AI. For various reasons, I think it's very unlikely they'll be able to. The problem is, though, even if they can't, AI's will fool us into believing their conscious. And of course, we're seeing that with AI psychosis and people forming these bonds with machines. That is the literal definition of the word dehumanizing. But we're going down that path. So who are we? What's special about us? I mean, I would argue that we have more in common with the animals who, like us, are mortal and can suffer and are vulnerable. Then we have with the machines. And the machines are really smart. We, you know, at the level of intelligence, they will outstrip us. I'm sure. I mean, they may have already. But they can't feel. And I don't think they'll ever feel. Because feelings have no meaning without vulnerability, without our mortality. And story. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The story. Yeah. Exactly. And so, so I think we're coming to this interesting moment where we will be rethinking what is what it means to be human. We went through this during the romantic revolution, during the industrial revolution. There was, you know, the rise of romanticism. And that was really an effort to like, here's what we are. Here's how we're different than machines. And it was the celebration of the human. And things like love that machines will never have as far as I'm concerned. So we believe that you believe that machines will never love. I don't, I don't see how they can, unless they become mortal in some ways, like us. I just think so much of who we are is tied to the fact that we are flesh and blood that will not live for us. And that shapes our lives and machines don't, don't do that. And intelligence and consciousness are not the same thing. We all know people who are highly intelligent and marginally conscious. And people who are conscious and not very intelligent. They're just separate. And I think that, I think we make a mistake. We also make a mistake in thinking that brains are like computers. And they're so different in so many ways. There's no distinction between hardware and software in a brain. Every experience can be found someday, you know, as a set of neurons connecting in a certain way. I mean, your brain is different than mine because you've had a different life than mine. They're not interchangeable the way computer hardware is. I mean, there's so many reasons for this. But I don't think that's in our future. I could be wrong. But the fact that we will be fooled is is is problem enough. And I think we're going to have to deal with all those mental health difficulties. That the kids come home from school. I've heard stories of this. And they want to tell their chatbot what happened that day before they want to tell their parents. And they formed a stronger relationship with that chatbot. I think that. There's a great line. The sociologist Sherry Turkel says. Technology can cause us to forget what life is about. And it's really true. If you think about it. Wow, that's it. We have a conversation with a machine, which now we do routinely, whether you're making an airline reservation or dealing with the chatbot. We call it a conversation, but in fact, we've grossly simplified what a conversation is. There's no eye contact. There's no body language. There's none of those ineffable qualities that facilitate human interaction. The emoji is the classic case, right? I mean, that that substitutes for emotion. So we're meeting the machines on their ground. And they're not meeting us on our ground. So anyway, I think the defense of human consciousness is like a really high level of consciousness. The defense of human consciousness is like a really high priority for me. In the rent spring sale, you can get an amazing deal faster than you can say, incredible value. Visit your local rent showroom right now and get up to 60% off our high quality, fully built kitchen units and up to seven years interest-free credit. Made for giving your kitchen a new beginning this spring. Ren, made for living. Offers apply when you buy five or more kitchen units. Finance object status minimum spend. I wonder what that says about our egos need for constant validation and reassurance. Where that comes from. Well, a hunger, a basic hunger. Probably not having enough love in our lives from our parents or enough. Yeah, there's a neediness. We'll satisfy it. We use our pets to satisfy it, right? The unconditional love of our dogs. And now we have these machines are doing it in a even more sophisticated way. And it almost feels like that's the crux of it. It's how to love again because the reason why we choose the chatbot over the person is the person says, we'll just go up to your bedroom, do your homework or the parent in that case or the parent says something like, oh, just these things happen or whatever it may be. But the chatbot's going to say, well, tell me how you feel. How was your day? And then you're going to say, how your day was? And it was about, oh, that's some feather that bully did that to you. It has the time to be empathetic. And it doesn't have its own interests. Yeah, it doesn't, like, you know, when you're having an exchange that other person might want a little attention and TLC also, not the chatbot. Yeah. And what does that say about our need to be self-centered, main characters? It's not a happy thought. But I mean, I think it just speaks to our need and our loneliness. We need more attachment than we have. And we have a basic hunger around that. And hopefully we found it from our parents and our partners. But not everybody does. And there are lots of people who live alone, who eat their meals alone. And this to them is a solace. And you know, there's talk about using robots with chatbots in them to take care of the elderly. And that idea just fills me with creepiness. Yeah. I mean, I get it. We don't spend enough time taking care of the elderly. But human connection is so important. I mean, more important, I think, than we realize. And there are things going on when humans take care of humans that you can't quantify, that you can't digitize. You know, we look into each other's souls. And can you fake that? I don't think so. Yeah. And even with the experience of animals, as you were saying, because we've got to overexposed to humans in maybe uncomfortable ways, in that you see humans every day and you take the granted and sometimes humans are rude. And sometimes they don't smile and all the things. I remember when I was fortunate enough to go to a trip to Rwanda a few years ago, and trek with the mountain gorillas. And so you're obviously in their mountains. They're not in a cage or they're not in a space that's controlled. I'm going to visit their home. I have never felt like that emotional around anything like it was so powerful and special to be that close. And I was just looking at my friends in. Do they make eye contact? So you're told not to make eye contact with them because it's a good intimidate them. But it is beautiful because we were asked to make this sound when we got closer to them. And the sound is, and it's meant to me in we come in peace. And what's fascinating is when they first told me this, I was like, okay, whatever. Like I was a bit skeptical. But I did it anyway and they do it back. And that was really special to have that exchange. It's like a handshake, isn't it? Totally. And they were so happy for us to be around them. And they didn't want to push us away. They didn't try to scare us. Like I was this far away from a silver bag. And we were just watching one of them like man spreading. Like the other ones, the kids were playing around. Like mothers were carrying their babies on their back and you don't see one or two. Families of like 16 gorillas walking together. And it's truly one of the most beautiful things. And I was just watching now my friends on Safari in Africa with their family. And she was just posting these stories of like little lion cubs playing to you. And I was just messing around. And I was just messing around. This is so beautiful. Like the ability, what you're saying is so evident to us that I never feel that way about a machine. I might be blown away by the size of a building or what it can do. But it doesn't appeal to this. Heart-centered, love-centered version of me that is, you know. So I think in the future, I mean, I think we're going to go through this period of redefining the human. Which I think is going to be really interesting. I call it in the book like a Copernican moment. Like when we learned we weren't the center of everything. And it was mind blowing and we had to change everything. And I think we're coming up on one. I think the net effect is we will draw closer to the animals. Who share the ability to feel, who share our mortality or vulnerability. And in opposition to the machines, in defending ourselves against the machines who are trying to form that bond with us. Hopefully that'll lead to more moral consideration for the animals. Who we have not treated as we should. I mean, you know, we think of factory farms. You know, I've done a lot of research on the food system. And supposedly if you're conscious, we were supposed to give moral consideration. But there are feed lots of full of conscious beings that we give no moral consideration and in fact treat with incredible cruelty. So I can see a future where our alliance, you know, we spent hundreds of years defining ourselves as against the animals. You know, we're the animal. We're the only animal that can do x, y, and z. You know, every one of those things has fallen, you know, language, culture, toolmaking, you know, turns out animals can do it all. So I think we will form more of a bond with animals as we have to deal on the other side with these machines that want our attention and our attachment. Yeah. Michael, thank you so much. I hope this is the first of many conversations we have because... I do too, it's first emulating. Thank you. Me too. I'm like, I could go for hours with you. It's like I'm fascinated, I'm riveted, I'm curious. The way you write is... I don't know, it also appeals to my heart. And I feel like that's something I hope we don't lose in the world as we go into AI, like the reading of actual thought and the world. And the writing. And the writing. And the writing. And the writing of it. Yeah, it's because it's so different. And we know, I mean, we can already tell when AI is writing versus a human's writing. And you can tell the sharing of a story and discovery when it's AI or not. But, you know, the way you write it especially, I feel is... It almost feels like you're writing from a meditation or psychedelic. And that's like a really special experience as a reader to feel like this isn't just research or thought. It's a revelation and expansion. And questioning, you know, I think... I think AI's have been taught to do answers and humans form questions. And I don't think AI's a very good at forming questions. And that's the only saving grace I think AI has offered is that we'll get better at asking questions. Yes, because I think... This is so important to using it well. Totally, I feel humans have become bad at asking questions over the last ever since I was born in that school. Because it was always about having the answers. Right. And now that I have all the answers... Questions are so much more interesting. Questions are so much more interesting and important today because AI will just give you what you ask it for. And so we have to get become better on it. I think that's a great point. Yeah. I think it's a great point. But, yeah, I tell my students, I teach students writing. And if you can form a good question, you've got everything you need to write a great piece. Because you've created a detective story essentially. You know, how do you answer this question? And that will be the path that leads you through the piece and all the material that you've accumulated. So getting good at asking questions is like very important. How do you relieve yourself of your... And maybe it's not yours, but how do you relieve yourself of society's addiction to solving and conclusions in a world where you're offering more questions and open to questions? Yeah, that's interesting. I don't know. So far it hasn't been a problem. I mean, this is the first time I've said at the beginning of a book, you may know what less it be in than the beginning. As a value proposition, I don't know how that's going to work out. I don't think it's true. As a reader, I would say that you are being humble and kind and generous. But the topic affords that humility, isn't it? Yeah. I understand why you said it. But also on the way to answering one question, you learn things you weren't... You didn't expect to learn. There's a ton I learned here. And I did go from wanting to answer the hard question. Which I was bringing in this very kind of Western male point of view, problem solution. This is how you frame things, right? This is how we've learned to frame things. And by the end, and I don't want to give away the end, but I end up meditating in a cave and realizing that, you know, yes, there's the problem of consciousness that's interesting, but much more interesting and important is the fact of it, this amazing gift we have. I got in touch with that. And I hadn't thought when I went into this project that attending to, being present to, was really going to be the answer. And that... So it took a turn. So the question gives you the path, but there's a lot of detours along the way. And you learn things you weren't expecting to learn. Michael, we end every on purpose interview, the final five. These questions have to be answered in one sentence maximum. We'll probably break our rule at some point, but let's see. Sam Michael Polland is your final five. The first question is, what is the best advice you've ever had or received? Here I'm going to draw on my father, who's a very wise person, and kind of a, he was a lawyer, but really a life coach. And more often than not, people would come to him with a dream. This is not one question. One example. That's right. It's beautiful so far. So please carry on. I won't put a full stop, anyway. And they had a dream of some kind. They wanted to start a business. They wanted to have kids. They wanted to get married by a house. And his advice was always the same. Do it. And people are held back by fear. And he could see that. These people had a dream, but they had a voice in their head that often came from their parents urging caution. And he would just say, do it. As my mother reminds me, it worked 90% of the time. People were happier that they did it. The 10% that didn't work were people who wanted to start restaurants. That's so good. Which is a really tough business. And maybe you shouldn't do it. Yeah, it's hard. So it's very simple. It's too word advice. But so many of us are held back and we spend our lives waiting for the right moment. And we don't make, we, you just have to force the issue sometimes. So jump. Absolutely. So that would be my advice. Yeah. Second question. What is the worst advice you've ever had or received? Oh, God. Go to law school. That was very common advice for people who weren't sure what they wanted to do. And there are not going to be a lot of jobs for lawyers. Question number three, I was wondering, did your cover of your book come to you in a experience of psychedelics? No, but it was very hard one. I love this cover because it suggests that there's something behind the world that we see. We went through many iterations and then the designer came up with this and I thought, that's it. No, I loved it too. It was so unique. I was like, this has to have come from the South. Not psychedelic. Yeah, or meditation. Question number four, if you could erase one false belief, humans have about consciousness. What would it be? Well, now, I mean, the false belief used to be that we had, we were the only conscious species. And we believe that for a very long time and that this was our privilege. I think it's getting erased. I think very few people believe that anymore. Other false. Hey, that's a good one. I feel like it needs to be. Yeah, it needs to be. It's not changing how we behave with the environment. We still act as though we're the only conscious being. That part. And everything else in the world is a resource. Yes. It doesn't have any point of view of its own. And I think we are learning or about to learn that everything has a point of view of its own. Everything has interest in agency. And we have to be more respectful. I mean, that one of the things that came out of writing this book for me was really a reenchantment of the world. And I realized that plants were sentient. I mean, you look at a forest differently. You look at a lawn differently. And so we have a long way to go. I think intellectually we know that there are lots of conscious creatures. But we're not acting that way. And fifth and final question we asked is to every guest on the show. I'm excited to hear you answer. If you could create one law that everyone in the world had to follow, what would it be? Too much responsibility. I hate telling people what to think. I'm not getting one. I'm not going to say, I'm not going to do one. I think that, yeah, it's not for me to say. I love that because that's the first time in the history of the show that we've had. Is that right? Yeah. So I love the answer. I'm going to have to go back and see what some of the other answers you got. We've had a mix. You get like the, you know, you get the love and be loved, the kindness you get. Yeah, you know, you get the fun ones like Trevor Noah said. He said, imagine one day you'd wake up and every day a different person in your community would end up bankrupt. So it could, and it could be you. So how would you treat each other knowing that one of you could lose everything? That's complicated. Yeah, it's complicated. James Corden said, you would be blocked out of your phone for every minute that you use it. Oh, that's it. So there's a saying. Well, here's one. I think we should have a law against machines talking in the first person. So how would it talk to us? I don't know. Third person. Right. I mean, just wouldn't say I. Yes, right. It could say you. So I think we should have a machine start using the eye. I think we go down of slippery slopes to mental illness. That's a great one. Okay. AI regulations. It's not going to happen during this administration, but it's going to have to happen eventually. Yeah. At some point using. Oh, absolutely. I mean, look, we may be too late again. Yeah. No, I mean, I think it will turn out to be a historical tragedy that AI came of age during this particular administration where there is no interest in regulating it at all. I mean, we made that mistake with social media once. You know, we could have said that companies are responsible for the ages. Yeah. I mean, there's so much we could have done. And now we didn't know, but now we know. We have that experience. Why are we repeating it? Anyway. Well, said Michael Pollan, the book is called A World Appears. Honestly, it's. I would encourage and recommend for every single one of you who are fascinated by this conversation, fascinated by Michael's other work to read it because it's. It's the most riveting reading I've done in a long time. Open questions, fascinating subject matter, explorations between psychedelics, meditation, consciousness, and everything beyond. So Michael, thank you for this gift. Oh, thank you, Jay. It's a pleasure to touch you. I hope we get to do this a lot more. Yes. For sure. Thank you. So, this is the end of the episode. You love my conversation with Dr. Joe Dispenser. On why stress and overthinking negatively impacts your brain and heart and how to change your habits that are on autopilot. Forgiveness is when you overcome the emotion of your past and so you feel so good that you no longer want to feel bad. This is an I Heart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.