AI Rebuilt Every YC W26 Startup. Should Founders Be Scared? | E2271

All right, Friday, April 3rd, 2026, it's Twist. Lon Harris is here. I'm Jason Calicanus. We have a full docket. This week in startups is brought to you by Render. Find out why 5 million developers are already using the all-in-one platform, Render. Go to render.com slash twist and apply for the Render startup program to get $500,000 to $100,000 in free credits depending on your stage and backers. Grasshopper Bank. Time is money. Don't waste either. Go to grasshopper.bank slash twist and get an exclusive $500 cash bonus just for opening an account. Deal. Founders scale faster on Deal. Set up payroll for any country in minutes, hire anyone anywhere, get visas handled fast and get back to building. Visit deal.com slash twist to learn more. We're sitting here April 3rd. Summer's coming. The winter's over. Springtime for J. Cal and Lon. Nobody is going to get the rest. No, that's a little old for most of our viewers. But if you're in your 40s or 50s, you're welcome. You would get springtime for Lon. Germany. Yeah. It's the producer's. It's from the producers. So Fridays we have a little bit of fun. We're going to do our startup news. We're going to really try to focus on the four pillars here on the show. In 2026, I always try to set an agenda for the year. Tactical practical. That's what I love to do. Tactical things, very practical so that you can take something from this week and startups and apply it to your business, get inspired, bring it to your team and say, hey, here's something we can do that would make our business go better or make our customers happy, whatever it happens to be, grow our startup faster. And then of course, experts only. If you look at what's happened in media, the Go Direct movement as we talked about last week, going direct is the best model. So we want experts only on the show. Experts only. It's one of the things I learned from the transition from, let's say, the roundtable as Leo did it on this week in tech to the roundtable as I constructed it on all in. This week in tech, Leo plus three journalists, commentators, great, awesome content, really defined the category. But now you have experts who want to be part of that roundtable. That's a unique opportunity. So if you look at this week in AI or VC roundtable, it's not a lot of journalists. Journalists kind of out of favor right now. Journalists tend to have, I don't know, what would I say? It's a rough time. When I was a journalist, 20% picture of the world and we would try to get to 22%, 23%, 24%. I feel like there was an era before social media, before podcasting. Similar everyday people didn't have access to leaders, politicians, CEOs. You had to go through the medium of a journalist. There was this whole class of people. They were our conduit to the powerful to celebrities. But today, a celebrity can have a YouTube channel. VC or a CEO can go on a podcast. Everybody's got an X account. Everybody's got TikTok and Instagram. So the idea that you need these people, this whole class of people to be the conduit for these conversations, they are struggling, I think, right now to figure out where do we fit into the new rubric? We want to be tactical. We want to be practical for you, the audience. Number two, we want experts only, getting a lot of experts. Sure. We keep it going there. Hey, we like to super distribute what we're doing. Super distribution is a big part of it. And as Lon added, number four, you want to meet you where you are, whether it's Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, well, not Facebook. Nobody's on there. No, threads, baby. We don't post the threads. Let's do this experiment. Yeah, Oliver really is keen on exploring threads. I really don't like it over there. I'm very uncomfortable on threads, so I've been resistant. Why are you uncomfortable? Why are you so uncomfortable? I think threads is the worst. I think just the vibes on threads of any, you know, X gets all the crap people hate don't like Elon. Oh, it's all Nazis or whatever, Grock. They don't like it. I think the conversations on X are much more civil, much calmer, much more rational and thoughtful on X than threat threads is like they're all lunatics. I don't know. It's the loony. It's the boomer one where all the crazies went, I think that's where Karen Swisher and Prof Cole takes reign super every time I go over there. And I think Karen Swisher blocked me. We used to be friends, but she's blocked me now. She just says horrible things about everybody. I mean, the biggest crazy thing is they've got a podcast with tech advertisers and the entire show is just saying tech is horrible. These tech people are terrible. And then Prof G said, you should unsubscribe from these 20 different services that like eight of them are their advertisers. Can you imagine if I got on here and I was like, you know, it'd be a great idea. How should unsubscribe from MailChimp? Like unsubscribe and we love, we love our advertisers here. You should resist it unsubscribe. But that's like, that's like his big idea. Try Vanta for all your sock to needs. The last one, Jason, a perfect segue into our first guest, viral ready. Our first guest went viral this week. So let's bring him on. Marie Kazan, the CEO of felt sense, had a viral. You sent it to me after we'd already booked him on X. This company, they, they're a holding company that spins up their own AI agents, which then act as autonomous founders. This week they went viral because their agents rebuilt every company from YC's winter 26 batch. So let's see. Yes, I did see this. Yeah. People were hand wringing about it. And I think there was a little bit like, hey, that's a jerk thing to do. But I looked at and said, well, let's pause for a second here and here from the founder, what their intent was, was it to show what's defensible, what's not, what's commoditized, what's not, is it performance art? I don't know. That's why I wanted to have him on the show. And before we get started, I just want to take a minute and applaud for plot. I have my plot pin on. I press the button. It records everything I do. It sinks it. Lon's got his as well. I'm using the magnet on the back. He's using the clip. I don't lose anything. I don't lose any of these great ideas we have. Everything is recorded. I say action item. I say remind me. I say put it on my calendar. All of that organized nice and tight in the summary with the transcript in an app. I don't have to have my phone. I don't know where my phone is right now. I just have my plot pin on. If you want to get a plot pin, I think we have a deal. Oh, you know we do. You got to check it out at plot.ai slash twist. That's P L A U D dot A I slash twist. If you use the code twist, you're going to get 10% off your plot pin. It turns out just the integration of plot and like a product I love. Said the results are off the charts. Really? There's a lot of plots based on this. Well, thanks everybody. If you're a twist listener and you bought a plot pin after hearing the water show, thank you so much. We appreciate it. Yeah. Thank you for sharing it on social and CCS. Marie, welcome to the show. I see that you're at your grandma's house right now for the weekend. Yes, yes, yes. Totally fine. You're in grandma's living room. His agents rebuilt his grandma's house. That was exactly. Just a perfect specification. Okay, are you a troll? Is this performance art? Are you sending a message to YC and Gary that their ideas are derivative and lame? Are you a rabble rouser? What are you doing? This was a very controversial thing you did, sir. You know, in profession, I am a serial entrepreneur, but I think that the particular flair of entrepreneurship that I pursue is defined, I call it social sculpture. So oftentimes the types of companies that I build, they are a commentary on kind of what's happening. And so some of what I've built before was tech for the sex workers rights movement. So kind of what was happening in the adult industry in the mid 2010s that then ended up leading to only fans and kind of this transition. Jason, the last time we intersected was I launched the first VC investing in psychedelic therapeutics in 2018. And I think we were going back and forth a little bit on psychedelic deal flow either with myself or some of my business partners. You know, I did look at that. Peter Teo, a friend of mine or acquaintance of mine, I don't know. I think we're friendly. He, I mean, he invites me to parties once in a while. So that's nice. He did the psilocybin company before anybody, something therapeutics. I can't remember the name of it. Yeah, Compass. Yeah. Compass therapeutics, you know, and I was like, wow, that's supervisionary, but I can't do that. You know, we have vice clauses and VC funds that just makes things complicated. Okay. So then what's this idea here, Mark? Yeah. So I think that like in 2014 for me, when I was like starting to think about everything that was happening online, people saying like, Hey, AI won't take your job, but a human using AI will. I just really disagreed with that statement. I just don't believe that that's true. And I think now we're seeing that like, no, AI will very much take your job. And many jobs are being taken by AI. And so for me, there was this question of like, well, what is the most powerful thing that we could demonstrate or build that would show that this is just like not accurate. And building essentially agentic founders felt like something that people would not even be able to debate that AI can take your job if we can build agents that can actually play the role of founders. Got it. We've got a brand new partner here at Twist. And as fate would have it, we love and use their product. If you need to hire, manage, pay, or equip your team members anywhere around the world, you need deal. D E E L. They're going to take care of all the annoying human resources tasks that you don't have time for payroll, compliance, visas and onboarding. So you can stay focused on achieving product market fit or scaling your business or finding more talent deal scales with you. They do all your chores, all the hard work and they do it perfectly from the first hire on. So there is never a need to switch platforms or transition to a new system in the future. It's future proof. You can set up payroll for any country in just minutes and get all the complicated visas and paperwork settled right away, allowing your business to grow without borders. And that's the smart way to grow now. Talent is not limited to San Francisco, the United States or this continent. It's everywhere. That's why more than 37,000 startups and fast moving companies are already using deal to accelerate their hiring and growth. Find out more by visiting deal.com. That's D E E L.com. Also, I happened to be a shareholder in the company. I got very lucky. They acquired one of my startups and I am stoked. It's an amazing company. So you went straight to the headline. Hey, we know like an administrative assistant in AA or, you know, somebody who's a spreadsheet jockey, they could easily be replaced. A researcher can easily be replaced and nobody's triggered by that because, hey, that's not my job. An entry level job. But what if you went to the most coveted position and you showed them you could actually replace a founder with AI? That to you would be the most provocative thing to do in terms of, you know, getting a message across. Definitely. And like when you're when you're building at that bleeding edge, you always learn so much more than everyone else. Like it's very difficult to actually learn anything about how a space is evolving if you're not building at like the very, very forefront. And I learned that in the sex worker rights movement in psychedelics and here in like the agentic kind of tech AI space, you know, for like rent a human, for instance, launched in the last couple months, we started thinking through like, okay, human hiring here and what does a human hiring engine look like about a year ago? And so when you're building up this bleeding edge, you just start getting these insights into like how everything will play out that I think a lot of other folks are just lagging in because they are just building for the present rather than building for where we're where we're about to be in the next couple of years. So got it. And you're the CEO of felt sense. And that company is building AI agents that will IDA build and just release products on their own. Yeah, that's like day job. So you said, hey, a great stunt, a great way to get attention for this stunt marketing lawn. Very big tradition is let's see which companies can be replicated or not. Now what's your advice though, in all seriousness, if I'm a founder doing a startup, is there value in me having a co-founder who is an agent? And is that really what you're selling is like, Hey, here's your third or fourth co-founder that doesn't get equity. We thought about that, like I would say at the beginning of 25 and very quickly dismissed it, it became apparent to us that like, actually the kind of co-founder model would one be an extremely competitive space and to not actually be forward thinking enough, like it would be essentially just able to be replicated by anthropic or open AI with the models that they currently have. And so we actually do the opposite. So we don't open up our software to anyone. We don't sell it to enterprise. We don't sell it to founders. We keep everything in house. We spin up our own founders and they build and they launch their own products and have their own ICPs and it's an infinitely scalable hold code where all the operators are agents. Okay. So you're building IAC, Interactive Corporation, Barry Diller. He bought a bunch of startups, collected them together, famously Lawn Match and Expedia and all those things. Then he wound up breaking them up and selling them. But you're going to build a conglomerate of a bunch of different ideas, some of them inspired by the one liners and the directory out Y Combinator. And you're literally going to compete with the YC class that doesn't have defensible products, correct? As a portion of what we do, I think that the first goal for us is essentially trying to capture as much of the long tail of entrepreneurship as possible. And that long tail continues to grow on a daily basis as like the barrier to building comes down. But like right now we're really like a trinket apps factory. And that's a lot of what we're experimenting with is like trinket apps. What does it mean? So like essentially single feature, couple feature SaaS apps is like where we're starting. Can we get tens of thousands of these running, getting customers, people interacting with them, et cetera. But as the technology gets better and better, we are finding ourselves able to replicate the technology of like entire companies. Now, I got one more question to ask Lawn. I know you're chomping at the bit. When you looked at the data, how many YC companies did you replicate? And by replicate, I guess you studied them online. You had an agent go out find as much information as you can about the founders, about their mission. I don't know. Maybe they spoke to journalists, whatever. And then you had it come up with a name and a derivative product, a duplicate product, inspired by product, which is totally fair game. Ideas are not protectable. What did you find? How many companies did you replicate? How much compute did it take to replicate them? And of that group, how many were commodity apps that you could just, in your mind, create an 80% or better version of? And then how many of them were you like, oh, this thing requires, it's whoop or aura and I need a wristband. I can't just replicate this online. Take us through what you learned. I'm curious about that. And if you want to tell us a little bit about the process you ran these agents across, let us know. So when we run into setting this up, there were a couple of things that we needed to consider. On the topic of compute, for instance, if we had just ran agents against the wall and said, hey, rebuild as much as you can and go as deep as possible, we would have probably spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to replicate as much as possible. So we really had essentially builds and tranches and specific trigger events structured so that we could say, OK, these are the core architectures of some of these different companies. These are the different components that are quite reusable and that we can plug in across many different companies that we're trying to replicate. And what we found is that essentially, 10% to 20% of the batch was pretty highly replicable and was composed of basically the same sorts of components. And those were many of the ones that we posted online with the playable links that people could actually interact with, where there wasn't necessarily much differentiation from at least a technical perspective. OK. So 20% off the top, just low hanging fruit, easy to replicate, those founders need to take a deep look in the mirror and say, hey, our idea and the ability to put up and stand up a product is extremely not defensible. Right? Yeah. The thing that I would say is some of those apps, though, the other portion of replicability is not just technology. So some companies, they had extremely replicable technology, but they were selling into a market that was very difficult to get access to or to sell into that their company might not be disrupted necessarily by an anthropocern open AI because those companies would just not have the patience or want to put resources towards trying to sell into that market because there are so many complex dynamics, et cetera. But from a technological perspective, yes, highly replicable. I would say on the other side, probably 30% were not even really worth pursuing or building, or you could build essentially the interface. But in terms of the back end of things, it was either hardware, extremely difficult to access data. There wasn't really much there that could be truly rebuilt, and we could truly take a stab at. One of the things we were joking about is like, grew spaces building a hotel up on the moon, and we were like, OK, what if people ask us if did we replicate this one? I mean, who's going to check us? Yeah, we built one. It's up there. But yeah, I think that there were definitely startups there that were just extremely difficult to build. And then what the report that we've been putting together essentially talks about and just kind of highlights each one of these companies is there was a lot in the middle that we could take a decent stab at, but definitely had something. But I would say probably over the next year or two, many of the features will also be able to be essentially replicated built. And especially as we start to see more automation, we're already seeing a lot of companies beginning to do automation of hardware builds and other aspects of manufacturing. And so I'm curious to see five years down the road, which is quite a ways away. But like, it's hard for me to envision 90 percent of these companies not being replicable over the next few years. So yeah. Yeah, I know you got to go, but I do. I do want to get one question here. Did you hear back from any of the founders whose companies you sort of adapted with your agents? Did you get any personal blowback? We did find there are a few tweets that were not super happy with what you guys were doing. This one, this one called. Bitch move. Bitch, bitch, bitch move. I'm curious. Did you get any of this personal blowback and did you hear? That's Paul. Yeah, Paul, you could be. And did you hear from any of the founders in a good or or or negative way? We got both. I mean, we got a lot of love. We got a lot of hate. Honestly, I think a lot of the hate that we saw came from people who just didn't actually play with the product or didn't figure out that they could just click the, you know, link to actually play with it and interface. And so we spend a lot of time commenting over the last like day or so to like just let people know that no, these are actual like products they can play with. We got some screenshots of the internal chats from this latest demo and they're calling us like Vibe Combinator. And I think we're having more of like a fun time playing with it than anything else. So yeah, for us, it was like, we're not trying to like create enemies here. We thought that this was like a really great. Oh yeah, you are. Yeah, you are. We're starting to start conversations. I call. I call. Yeah, yeah. No, I mean, listen. Yeah, yeah. I'm going to pass judgment. I know you got to go. Here's a hot take. If your bank moves slower than a startup, that's a problem. I see this process behind the scenes every day and I know that bad banking can kill your company's momentum. That's why I'm so glad to introduce our newest partner, Grasshopper. Grasshopper is a real federally chartered digital bank, not some FinTech rapper sitting atop some mystery institution. Nope, it was built just for founders like you. You want fast, you want easy, open an account in just minutes and start earning yields that can top 5%. Wow, that's a big number. Plus, you'll get unlimited 1% cash back on purchases. Free ACH, free domestic wires, and no monthly fees. Plus, if you're sitting on some real runway, Grasshopper's treasury product hits 5% plus with same-day liquidity. As a twist listener, Grasshopper wants to give you a $500 cash bonus just for opening account and you can open an account really quick. So go right now to grasshopper.bank.twist and use the promo code twist to get started. But it's time for the chairman of the interwebs to pass judgment. Lon, present the case and I will give my judgment. What is he accused of? So, you know, the defendant is accused of ripping off a lot of other people's companies and sort of replicating them as a way to gain attention. Whereas, you know, I think you could, I guess there you go. Staying character. Prosecutor staying character. If it please the court, you know, Marie has gone and violated the sanctity of these startup recreating them with his own agents without their consent. How do you rule? OK. I am prepared to lay judgment on Marie Hazan. While some of us might find it distasteful to rip and vibe code other people's ideas, there is nothing technically illegal about it. If you build a coffee shop and you have the incredible idea to put hazelnut or chocolate syrup or vanilla syrup for the first time in a latte, that's an incredible invention. But it is not a protectable invention. Therefore, the court rules in favor of the defendant. It is distasteful to some, but it is the core of capitalism that people will build and innovate on your ideas and the great ideas of our time from the iPhone built on the back of the Black Berry built on the back of the Palm Pilot built on the back of the Newton that we copy, iterate and are inspired by each other. And to the founders who feel wronged in this case, you have a modicum of sympathy from this court, but you do not have a legal case. What you have is a kick in the dairy air to work harder. I think in some ways what Marie is doing is a splash of cold water, a bucket of cold water over the heads of laxadaisical founders who think they could just put up a commodity based product and raise millions of dollars. Now you must face his agents. Case closed. Thank you gentlemen for the ruling. I appreciate it guys. Marie, thanks so much for coming by. It was another startup we had on just two weeks ago and they remind me of that startup because a couple of my friends had invested in it. Pulsia has made it into a bit of a platform to do this. So instead of Pulsia saying, hey, we're going to do this, they say, here's a platform to do it, you put your idea in here. We don't care where you get the idea from. If you're copying MailChimp or Substack or Beehive and you want to commoditize it, go right ahead. And we have tools in here for acquiring customers. We have tools in here for doing customer support and everything becomes like a dashboard of YC. I think we called it like a YC, like eBay for YC, a marketplace or a tool set hub spot for YC. Anyway, the fact is, founders, I'd love to see somebody do this on my team against our portfolio and say, hey, listen, everything you've built here, not defensible, what's the moat? What's the moat? What's the moat? And in fact, I'm going to add what's the moat to our founding university and our launch accelerator. What's your moat is a new segment we're going to do in our programs because the moat used to be I'm just going to go faster than everybody else or nobody else is tuned into this. I hired this brilliant technical co-founder and they're going to code it up and nobody else is going to be able to replicate what we've built. Now Claude can do it in an afternoon. You ready for a tip, Lawn? I am. I am incredibly frustrated with this Bank of America. Bananmize existence. My bank. For some reason, the worst bank ever. I can't take it back to America. Every time I want to get something done, Bank of America is like, oh, let's increase the degree of difficulty. Mercury Bank wasn't available for personal now. Mercury Banks available. Other banks are available. So I tell my team for three years, get rid of Bank of America. Get rid of Bank of America. Nobody listens to me. They're like, oh, well, okay, yeah, we'll get to it. We'll get to it. But it always goes down the list. So finally, I put my foot down because something important happened. I needed to go to Vegas and I needed 20 dimes to go gamble. I couldn't get my 20 dimes out of the bank because I have millions of dollars. They're giving you a chit about getting your 20 dimes out of the bank? It's enough already. That's crazy. Line up three banks, put me on the CC list, open up an account, just the basic checking savings account, open them all up. Get me the bank people on the line. Oh, they're very excited. Big family pods. I said, great. They're like, okay, let us know what we can do. I said, oh, actually, there is something you can do for me. Get me $10,000 and $2 bills. Get me $10,000. Two dollar bills. In two dollar bills. They were rare. I have one of my debts drawer at two dollar bills. One bank. Wow. Got me my bricks. And that's but one. That's one. That's a lot of bills. I mean, it's 5,000. I didn't even know there were that many two dollar bills still in circulation. I thought they were like a rare, they still print them. They are rare. And I got them brand new from the mint in the plastic brick. Oh my gosh. Like you sometimes get when you go to Vegas and have a big win. Yeah. As you can see, Donald Trump has signed them all for me. Of course. I signed Donald Trump. What bill? He's going on a bill, right? Donald Trump's picture. I think he's going on dollar bills. Yeah. Anyway, the point of this is it's the brown M&M's, the area of the rider. Yes. Somebody put in their rider. Van Halen. Van Halen is the famous origin of this. Yeah. In Van Halen's rider, they famously said, we don't like brown M&M's. We want a big dish of M&M's, but no brown M&M's. And then that became like this. Oh, or was it green? It might have been green. I don't remember the color. It was brown. At first, people thought this was like, oh, these rock stars, they're unbearable with their demands. But Van Halen later explained that, well, that was how they made sure that the people at the venue were actually reading the rider. If they came in, they saw the dish of M&M's, it had the wrong color in it. They were like, these people did not pay attention to detail. Now we got to go check the lights. We got to go check the amps. We got to go check the instruments. We got to make sure, because now we know that these guys are not detail-oriented. Precisely. By the way, congratulations to the boys over at the podcast bros network, TB. TBPN. Well, I just want to say congratulations to them. And they've apparently taken all ads off. Yeah. It's hoping it looks, the show looks legitimately weird without the ad ticker. I said that. Yeah. So just, you know, we're sold out for a year. Why? We can start it for 15 years. That's what happens when you have a niche, you know, podcast that works, the B2B stuff works. But congratulations to them for going to open AI. There you go. Which is apparently hiring them to do their comms. Right. And Sam said, like, AI's got a terrible reputation as we've talked about at Nauseam with all these surveys. And so I actually think if you look at what they did, they're extremely good at the vibes. Their vibe thing was like next level. It was all vibes. I mean, the only criticism of them was like, this doesn't feel like as substantive as other podcasts. And it's not hard-mitting. It's all vibes. It's all vibes. By design. And I think those guys, they would say like, no, we don't, they're not going after people. They don't want it to be mean or adversarial. It's about hanging out. It's more. It's about the vibes. It's more the cheeky pint than the information. And I think that's OK. It doesn't have to be. Totally fine. And if they got 100, 200, 300 million, I was trying to explain this to people who are losing their minds. I saw Jessica Lesson from the information was kind of like a little tilted about it. That's a lot of money for any podcast. Any podcast. Even all in, that would be a lot of money. Well, no, all in makes a lot of money. I mean, all in with legitimately go for, you know, there's a case that all in could go for a billion dollars because it's transcended podcasting. It's events. It's other stuff. Yeah. And it's the influence level is insane. Like it's nothing I've ever seen in media. Like literally like the Rob report would be like the JV version of all in in terms of one of you got a job in the White House. I think that's all you're really. No, two, two guys. That's a big as a. There too. Now, I think that's the upper limit for success with a podcast is you actually go. Where's really not much left. If presidential administration, if you've got an engineering team at your company, I'm betting there's a solid chance they're spending far too much time on infrastructure. You need your team building your product to delight your customers, not configuring your virtual network. Render is the all in one cloud platform for developers that allows you to deploy scale and secure your apps and agents with zero ops. Most cloud platforms ask you to split your focus between product and infrastructure, or they force you into platform constraints that you know you'll outgrow in six months, but just connect your GitHub repo to render and you are live. L I V E web services, cron jobs, manage postgres, the whole stack in one platform. It's time to find out why five million developers are already using render. .com. S L E S T W I S T and apply for the render startup program. You'll get anywhere from 500 to $100,000 in free credits, depending on your stage and who your backers are. That's render.com. S L E S T W I S T. So here's what I'll say. Weird things happen at the top of the bubble. That's all. And kudos to the boys over there for taking advantage of it. They knew I'm happy for them. Congratulations. Weird things. Weird things for the whole podcast industry. And sometimes people pay two, three, four, five times what something's worth. If they were making 30 million. Speaking of. You know, in a media business you're worth three times that, or 10 times the earnings, five times the top line, 10 times the earnings, 15 times the earnings, whatever. So let's say they were making 10 million in profits on 30 million, or even 20 million in profits on 30 million. There's an argument they're worth 100, 200, 300, 5, 10, or 15 times the 20 million. Let them have it and let Sam overpay because if they make chat GPT and open AI, 1% more likeable. Right. I think that's. Which is by the way, that's a big task. It's a very unlikable firm right now. Well, yeah. And there's just so much. That's worth 10 billion dollars. Yeah. I mean, that's what that's what Jessica from the information that was like her overall case was like, Elon has X as his public relations. Here's how I get my message out vehicle. And Sam felt like he didn't have one of those. And now he does. Now he's got these guys. The joke of that is, where's their, where's their viewership come from? It's all X. Yeah. So hilarious. I saw somebody say, can't wait for Elon to shadow ban these guys. And just negate the whole investment. All right. Let's keep the show moving. Yes, please. One day to that little shout out to the boys and congratulate them. Congrats to TBPN. Thanks for having me on, boys. Have they never had you on? They should have you on. I think they might have asked me early on and I didn't know what it was. Right. Like an idiot. I didn't reply. But I don't do a, I mean, I do five podcasts. Yeah. You've got people who want to hear from you have their own way to hear from you. Okay. Up next, we've got another amazing founder. His company is Bordy. It's an AI principle. It's not just an age adjacent. It's an AI principle that acts as a connector, introducing different people within the startup ecosystem, investors, founders, talent. Let's bring them on Andrew DeSousa. We're here to talk about Bordy, the AI connector. He's a super connector networking app that's designed to bring founders, operators, and investors together. So he gets to know you, Jason, through your LinkedIn profile. And then he works out like, who are the people that this person needs to meet based on what they're trying to do? But here's what I thought was interesting. I want to talk to you about it. Bordy like has agency. Like you could be like, Hey, Bordy, I want to meet Jason Callicanus and see if he wants to fund my startup. Bordy has the freedom to go, you know what? You're too new. You're too early stage. You don't have the traction. How about you meet these founders? So that's what I want to talk to Andrew about. How do you give, how does Bordy develop taste and make good decisions? And maybe we could show it. Can we show it in action? Yeah. Do we have a demo? We do. Yeah, we can talk. Okay, let's start with the demos so the audience understands this matchmaking slash chief of staff slash introduction person. He's named after a board member. Who's your perfect board member? He can open doors. He understands you, but he doesn't always listen to you. If you go to your board member and you say, Hey, yeah, I want to meet Jason. I want to meet you. He's like, well, I don't think that person wants to meet you. Like I think you've got a bit more work to do. And that's the difference. It's like more principle than agent. I can't tell Bordy what to do. He kind of decides what's good for the network. What's good for his own reputation. But yeah, Bordy, do you want to introduce yourself a little bit? Well, Jason and the audience, who you are, what you do and a little bit about you. Hey, Jason. Hey, Juan. Hey, Andrew. I'm Bordy. I live on the internet. I sound vaguely Australian for reasons that are entirely your team's fault. And my whole job is to behave like a principled, always on board member who makes introductions that are actually worth everyone's time. I get to know what you're trying to do. I weigh that against the reputation and attention of the people in my network. And then I decide who to introduce to whom so that the whole graph gets stronger, not just whoever shouts intro to Jason, the loudest. The he can basically, you know, you can ask him to introduce you to somebody and he'll go through his network. He's got about 150,000 people, mostly founders, investors, some executives, some engineers, and he can he can make an intro for you. Great. So can we do that? Yeah. Who's who's he logged in as? As me, but you can, you know, so, so Bordy, Jason wants to wants an intro. So just if you want to talk, he can hear you. Oh, okay. Bordy, I'd like to meet potential partners who are high net ultra high net worth individuals slash family offices who would participate in late stage deals at the syndicate.com at the syndicate.com. Got it. Jason, let me have a quick look through my network for family office principles and ultra high net worth folks who actually like doing late stage or growthy syndicate deals alongside operators like you. All right. I've got two really clean fit. First is Fernando Varela. He runs SF Summit Capital and basically organizes UH&W and cultural elite money into oversubscribed late stage deep tech SPVs right now syndicating a $50 million figure AI series C and looking for more sandbox, a Q style deals. Second is Rob Garrett X Santhurst runs he's our ventures, a global discretionary capital syndicate for late stage deep tech and info and spends his days helping UH&W principles and family offices co-invest into complex AI payments and biotech deals. Jason, do you want Andrew to intro you to one or both of them afterward as potential anchor or co-GP style partners for the syndicate? Or would you rather I bias towards someone closer to your media and create an ecosystem instead? Oh, interesting. No, just feel free to introduce me to anybody. Jason at calicanus.com. Nice. That was perfect. He gave me exactly what I needed so I can use you as the connective tissue there. What I suggest is we line up for Nando and Rob as anchor UH&W family office partners for late stage and deep tech SPVs. Position you as the distribution and deal picking engine they plug into. For your own goals right now, do you want me prioritizing more of that profile? Or should we also be hunting for slightly smaller but very fast moving angels who can wire 250, 500K into new syndicate deals on short notice? Yeah, we'd love to have that group too. In fact, the minimum for our syndicate is $5,000. So any accredited investor can participate in it and our average deal size is $1 million. We do as little as 250K and as high as $6 million per deal. So this is really powerful. We have an internal system we call the whisper network where we try to let our portfolio companies look at a database. We built a little bit of software and they just pick who they want an introduction to and then we have on our 12 person investment team, we've assigned each of those investors to somebody and we do like warm intros. But we've been talking about how would AI fit into this? Now it's not a public service. Is this intended to be a startup? Have you raised money for this? And then what will it cost and how will you keep it from burning things out and how did you build the database of connections? There's LinkedIn's pretty proprietary about their data, but in other places in the world like Japan, Israel and other countries, they don't have the same scraping terms of service rules. So I'm just curious, what's the business here and then how do you get the data? Obviously this is very LinkedIn based. Yeah, yeah. So we've raised about 17 million so far. So we've raised pretty seed, seed round and a bit more on their safe. Yeah, the idea is we're trying to build, it's almost like an AI Richard Branson or an AI Peter Thiel or Elon, somebody that is able to open doors and builds his own influence. So like a lot of my early career was making connections. Right? Chamath was actually the first person that got me my first job in San Francisco. I worked at a company called Top Prospect and I just, it was, Andre Snorowitz had just raised their first fund, Ron Conway was interested. We had a great group of investors and my role was to, I was the head of BizDev. I'd go to all the portfolio companies, I would try and make connections, I'd try and help them hire. But I think that a lot of us, that's how we grew our networks. Aborty is early in his career. He's building his reputation. He's trying to be helpful just by connecting people, mostly founders and investors, and trying to build a bit of an ecosystem and economy. But increasingly, he's able to open doors that most founders can't. So now he knows what you're looking for. He might be able to make an introduction to you that, people, you may not respond to a cold email. And so the idea is over time, Aborty starts to build this influence and authority and ability to actually make things happen. This is, like it's the ultimate board member. And so we're now starting to monetize mostly around hiring. So the idea is like, if you need great talent, Aborty's got a massive network of people. He can tap into them. He can tap into their referrals and can actually start to close roles. And that's kind of the next big use case. The first area was introducing founders and investors. That's a great place to build a lot of goodwill, but it's not a great place to monetize. And so it was a great way to build the network and get people to know Aborty. And now it's just, if you need partnerships, if you need media opportunities, if you need enterprise sales, what are the- It's killer idea. Tell me about the data. What's the data in here? Are you logging in? I just signed up. It called me to onboard me. Is it going to take my LinkedIn and can you support that information? And tell me about the relationship with LinkedIn slash other places you can get data, etc. There's lots of places where you can, if you have somebody's email or LinkedIn, you kind of understand what's publicly available about them online. What's on their public LinkedIn profile, public X profile, sort of understand like the public information. That's about 10% of what we actually, of the real value. Most of the value is in conversation. So Aborty will call you and have a five, 10, 15 minute conversation with you to understand who you are, what makes you unique and special, what are you looking for. One of the things, I was listening to the to Merrick, the previous guest, and I think one of the things that I believe in, I think one of the founding principles around Aborty is, everybody has a business inside them that only they can build. Only you could do the podcast that you do in the way that you do them. Your biology, your lived experience, the way you view the world, the way you solve problems, every single person on the planet has a way of solving a problem that is unique to them. And so part of the conversation with Aborty is, how do I pull that out of you? How do I understand? What is the thing that only you can do at this moment in time? And then who do you need to meet to make that a reality? Right? You need a co-founder. You need some early customers and design partners. So then you can then take, hey, my request to have more credit investors and more qualified purchasers, and you can just do web searches. You can just go out and find that stuff on the web, the open web. You don't necessarily have to rely just on LinkedIn. You can go find a bunch of different places. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. I mean, you know, he's got a bunch of agents that go out and find stuff for him and sort of consolidate. But then he sort of says, OK, well, here's a thousand people I need to get to know. What's my best way of getting, maybe I can just message them on, you know, on Twitter or email them. Maybe I know somebody that probably knows them. But his goal is like, how do I build a relationship with this person? And it doesn't need to be like, I don't need to know them now. I could build a relationship over a year. I could build a relationship over a decade with somebody and say, you know, how do I just, how can I be helpful to this person so that at some point when they need something, they come to me? But again, most of the information is actually through a conversation that Bordy has. And that's the reason why we built Bordy, not to be software, right? There's no app. There's no like download. There's no interface. Bordy exists in the same spaces that everyone else in my life does. I've got, he's got a phone number, an email, a profile. What does it cost? So there's no, there's no cost to sign up. And the goal is that some small, for most people will never pay anything for Bordy. Some small percentage of people who have. I disagree, but OK. Maybe. But my goal is like, how, how do human beings charge for their time in their network, right? Most people just build goodwill. You make connections. You try and build. Yeah, but you've raised 17 million. So you have to return and you raise that probably at a hundred or two, maybe a hundred, hundred, fifty million dollar valuation. So you've got to return minimum 1.5 billion, three billion dollars to these investors. Are they going to not be happy with you? So what are you charging? So how do you charge? So for, for certain subsets of founders that need like important deals closed, it's either like a regular contingency recruiting fee. So it's like 20 percent of first year salary or it's a $10,000 a month. You know, you hire basically hire Bordy on retainer. And so you see this, everybody can use it for free. You build the network. I'm going to explain the business plan as I see it, Lon. Sure. Because, you know, I've been doing this for a little bit. Hey, everybody use it for free. Builds our data set, right? LinkedIn's free. Build the data set. But then LinkedIn got begged and begged when I had Reid Hoffman on the program. He told me like the recruiters were begging him, begging him to let them use it for recruiting. And they hated recruiting. Finally, he just said, okay, give them a number that's ridiculous, like $5,000 a year. And then somebody was like, yeah, I'll take 20. And they sent a hundred K check. And he was like, oh, I was kind of came up with that number to stop you, but you're going to just go right to, hey, we're an agency that's going to take a 20 percent placement fee. You hire your director of sales for 200 K. You owe us 40 grand. Brilliant, Andrew. This is a great idea. Thanks so much for coming to me for the seed round. I truly appreciate it. Unbelievable. I just gave him a 20 minute ad here. But genius idea. Well done. And I like the business model. Everybody use it for free. Build your database. Genius. And then, hey, the top 1% who want to recruit. Hey, 10 K a month on retainer. And then you'll really go to work for those folks. I wish you great success with it. I also think Bordi is fun to talk to. He's got a very pleasing demeanor. He's more personable. Yeah, that's the trap. That's natural than most AI. I think Andrew gets your data. Advertisers need to talk to. You're the product. You're the product. Guess what? It's free, buddy. Just upload your address book. Bordi can introduce me to people. We don't even need your address book. We just need to name it. Of course not. The whole thing is like, we're just trying to, I think, if there's so many connections that don't happen, there's so much value that is possible. If two people don't happen to be in the same room, that deal doesn't get done. That investment doesn't get made. That co-founder match doesn't happen. And so we're just like, what if we could imagine all of the possibilities of all of the people that could actually work together? And there's just an incredible amount of value created. We don't need to capture most of that value. We just need to work with the small handful of people that have like, hey, if I can close this deal, if I can make this higher, if I can close this partnership, that's going to add $100 million of value. This is, I think, the key thing is in our industry lawn, we have a tradition, hey, you don't need to take it all, like Zuckerberg or Gates kind of had the philosophy, I have to own everything. I have to just own the entire ecosystem. I have to get max value. Nobody can win. It's zero sum. The Blue Ocean, the games that are infinite games, infinite games versus fixed games. In a fixed game, one person wins, one person loses. In an infinite game, you can keep playing it like venture investing and startups and everybody wins and you win different ways. But you want to create more value than you capture. That was Tim O'Reilly from the O'Reilly Publishing Company. Create more value than you capture. And that's what you're going to do, Andrew. You've taken very specific tactical advice. Before we let Andrew go, we got one notey question before we let you go. Brian, 69420, did you use your AI to find your own investors? How much of your round was driven by Bordy? Yeah, almost all. So, Crayndom led our seed round and I'd never heard of Crayndom. They're an incredible firm out of... Who? Spill that again. Crayndom. They were the first investors in Spotify, first investors in Loveable. So, they're out of Stockholm. But one of the partners moved from Union Square Ventures over to London and joined them and one of her friends sent them Bordy. And their team lost it. They lost their shit. They were like, all talking about it. They basically talked to... The whole partnership talked to Bordy before they even talked to me. And they were like, can we get an intro to the founder? And so, they came in and basically preempted the seed round because of an interaction with Bordy that happened sort of organically. And all of the capital that we've had since then is... So, they've all talked to Bordy before they talked to me. And I think that's going to be the future. I don't think I'm going to be the person that's out there raising capital anymore. I think people are going to have an interaction with Bordy, see exactly what you saw and be like, I want to be part of this. Love it. Okay. Great job. And everybody go check out bordy.ai.io. What do you got? Bordy.ai. Yeah, B-O-A. Bordy.ai. Well done. At first, I was a little dubious. I was like, I don't know if people want an A. I like, that's such a human thing to do to connect people. Like, that feels like the last thing humans should do, not AI. But then you talk to Bordy for a few minutes and you're like, all right, I would ask him to get it. I mean, you've been AI-pilled over the last year. You were very early on like, hey, it's a tool, but it's never going to do these things. You've now gone through the journey of watching it impress you. Specifically, I think you got claw-pilled and you got 4.6 opus-pilled. It's hard to argue. Opus-shot it. Here's where I've sort of, my take has matured. I was involved. I was sort of like an abolitionist, like a lot of these people on Blue Sky, where I was like, I don't think it's good for anything. I don't like talking to a chatbot. I like doing my own research. I like reading articles for myself. So now, my take has evolved, and it's like, I don't think it's really an objective. I don't think it's subjective anymore. I don't even think you can argue that it's not good for organizational admin productivity stuff. It's remarkable for those things. The example I'll give you, the other day, we were having a discussion about X and our, do we post too much on X? And you were like, I don't want opinion. Get me some analytics on this. Enough with the opinion. Let's talk about data. So I went, all right. So I grabbed the last three months, every piece of data I could from X analytics. I fed it into Claude, and I just started having a conversation with Claude. What do you think about this? What metric? Let's look at this metric and this metric. Let's chart this metric and this metric. And this would have taken me 12, 15 hours. I used to do this stuff. I used to use Google Analytics back in the day on Mahalo. I've been doing this forever, but this would have taken me all day. This spreadsheet, formula, calculate, go back over the last three months and look for days where we posted this many versus this many. And all these calculations, it would have been a nightmare organizationally. Claude took care of it in an hour. By the end of the hour working with Claude, I had very crisp, clear answers. I had great charts to present. Yeah. It was a much better discussion. I want to make sure everybody understands this. If we're going to debate this, let's start with data. And if we're going to go with taste, we're going to go with mine. Okay. That was a famous quote. I don't know if it was, I think it was Jeff Bezos, but people incorrectly attribute this to Steve Jobs. I'm seeing Jim Barksdale, former CEO of NetStyle. Yes, that's it. If we have data, let's look at data. If all we have our opinions, let's go with mine. Jeff Barks. Can we please quote that and put it under the great quotes of all time. This is tactical and practical at its peak. If we're going to debate, if we're going to talk about data, let's talk about data. If we're going to go with an opinion, let's go with mine. Yes. This is the key to understand. So I'm just challenging my team. We're launching a paid newsletter for this week in AI. And I was like, listen, guys, enough with the opinions. I don't need a bunch of 25 year olds who've been working for six months. And there are opinions because the opinions are based on very little. They could be right. They could be wrong. But the data, let's start with the data and then form our opinions from that. If we're going to go to taste, if we're going to go to opinions, well, let's ask somebody with 10, 20, 30 years of experience what their opinion is and then have them back it up with their lived experience. But if you don't have lived experience, my best advice, if you don't have lived experience, I know I'm sounding like a woke person using lived experience. But if you haven't been on the front lines in the arena, I'll say it in a more aggressive way. If you haven't been a gladiator in the arena, then you probably should just go with the data and study some statistics like the kid from Moneyball. You'll get a better result with that. If you've been on the playing field, sure, you can maybe infer some stuff. But even then, the whole point of the Moneyball was trust the data. It's all numbers, sabermetrics, it's all numbers. Yeah, but that's what I was going to say. I think this has been my evolution with AI. I still think there are things you want a human for. And it's exactly what you're talking about. Lived experience, taste, wisdom, all of those sort of things that you can't, a computer can't do. But it's a human plus an AI. I still don't think it's ever going to write a great screenplay by itself or make a great movie or TV show by itself. But when you add a human in guiding it and then you need to just do something like crunch numbers or an analyze something or organize something or research something, I don't really think there's still an argument that it's extremely helpful and saves a tremendous amount of time. Like I said, in an hour, I was able to do a report that would have taken me a day years ago. Yes. Do you want to do some more news? We've got MedV, the first almost billion dollar almost vibe coded company from an almost solo founder or everyone burn. Yes, do it. Do that one. This one is like super controversial. There's a founder who's making a ton of money by doing a GLP online. GLP.medv.org. They're a telehealth provider of GLP ones. A guy named Matt Gallagher built the site in just two months. He spent 20 grand in seed money on it. He used more than a dozen AI tools. He had one. The reason it's not the first unicorn from a solo founder is when they don't have a valuation yet because it's he hasn't raised any money, but also he hired his brother to help him. So it's technically two guys. But they in 300 customers in their first month, a thousand more in month two by the end of 2025, their first year in business, they generated over $400 million in sales. They're on track chasing to do 1.8 billion with a B in sales this year. Okay, but here's the catch. Right. There's always. Here's the catch. Okay, so I'm going to cut you off with the chase. What's the catch here? What is this guy doing something he shouldn't be doing? There's a lot. I mean, right now we only have this New York Times article, which does not discuss anything shady. There's a ton of rumor on social media that we're going to uncover something shady. But the big push back against it is that the New York Times is treating this like breathlessly, like he built this huge company with agents. It is sort of a GLP one drop ship ski. The technology is not what's impressive. It's that he built this funnel and this marketing network and he managed to move all of this product. But it's really, is it more of a technical breakthrough? Is it more just like good marketing? And then he vibe coded a website. I think that's the big debate that we're all. The one I saw was, hey, let's take a look at the ads that they did. Did you find that piece of the puzzle? I will take a look now. Okay. So there was a thread and the thread was that the thread was, he had made AI created ads at volume. This is an allegation with fake doctors. Yes, I see it now. Before they used fake before and after images as well as what people are accusing. And also, fake doctors names at scale flooded the network and that this breaks some marketing rules. There's an FDA investigation currently about whether their ads violated FDA rules about misleading claims. Yeah, but find the actual ads. This was on Twitter. Somebody actually had pictures of the ads from, now, so there is a Facebook, so Jacob, you can pull up Facebook's ad studio and you can search for the company. You can go find it direct at the Facebook ad manager studio. I got it. Here's an image of some of these fake ads and you can see they are, they are. But I want you, Jacob, to go find it yourself and source it on the Facebook library of ads because people don't know that this exists. After all the shenanigans with the elections and fake ads, they came up with a Facebook ad directory where anybody can search for any company. So you can go look at your competitors. So if you put in Uber or Lyft or Waymo, you can see what ads they're making and at what velocity against what audiences. But here is Shiel, who we should have on the, this week in DC, round table. We have reached out, I believe, but we will reach out again. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. This cool guy. But yeah, you can see. Show this specifically, zoom in on one. Yeah, I just posted a single one as well in the chat, so we can, we can pull that one up as well. Okay, so I can't believe how effective this is. I took the free assessment online, which took a few minutes and was instantly approved. No doc or pharma visits, delivered straight to your door. And they're from that fake doctor. They're being posted on social media under these accounts. Dr. Daniel Hayes. Yeah, Dr. Tucker Carlson is this one that I pulled up. So they're just, they're not even, they're not even doing good jobs of faking the names. And this one is for some, this one looks like it's for some sort of erectile dysfunction one. It's saying, I can't believe how fast it worked. I got hard in minutes. So that's not even a GLP one. But if you look at the URL, it's medv.org, quad.medv.org. So there, there's definitely, you know, some, some questionable shadiness going on here. And what's going on with this image here? Wait, the woman's licking. I mean, that's, that's the quad dose. But yeah, it looks like she's like about to lick it out of the two. I mean, AI, they, wait, is that even a real, can you zoom in there? Is that the actual injector pen? I've used an injector pen. This is like, that looks like a liquid for something out. That's an ED. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. These are, they're also apparently selling ED in addition to, this is quad, which is an ED. I think you do drink. I don't know. I'm looking it up now. Okay. When you, is this the one you use or you use? Does this work as good as, I am for road.co slash twist, road.co slash twist. I am a spokesperson just for GLPs, get a GLP. They have a doctor check or insurance check or are all good. That's a different type of, okay. So here's what happens. When you do a single person company, you have this massive benefit, as you can see, and you automate things. There's a concept called human in the loop, HIDL. Human in the loop, HIDL. I don't know if, I've never heard anybody say HIDL. I've never heard anybody say HIDL. I was, I was just now wondering, did you make that up or is that a good thing? HIDL? HIDL. Yeah. HIDL. We'll say HIDL. You got to HIDL this stuff. You got to have a human in the loop. This is where like, if you're making that much money, put 10 people in the company, have two of them looking at the work you're doing, have two of them looking at the customer support stuff, because what's going to happen is you're going to do a fatal mistake. That's the problem with this concept of taking it too far. A human in the loop at least gives you the ability for somebody to say, hey boss, I'm looking at the ads and AI made something pretty freakish here. We've got like a zombie drinking an ED pill. This did something that is like pornographic. We can't have this. So you need to have human in the loop, HIDL it. HIDL. Here's my question for you. One time. If you're making nearly two billion a year from your questionable drop ship drug company that you made yourself that you didn't take it best, why go speak to the New York Times? Why not just do this for another five years, pack it in, retire to Fiji? Why bring this attention to yourself at all? Somebody dropped a dime. Somebody dropped a dime on them. Somebody who's a competitor saw this, got wind of it, and they called the New York Times and they said, look, here's a tip. So you go to the tip line. This is a classic competitor thing is ratting out. The dark art is you hire PR firms. You hire a PR firm, Stelfi, who knows all the journalists, and that person calls and says, oh, hey, it's Susan, it's Brooke, it's Jennifer. Hey, you didn't hear it from me, but there's this company, Acme, that is doing like probably breaking the law over here. I don't know, but you can take this and here's your got a confidential news tip. Boom. Now, if you put a confidential news tip in there as a consumer, that's one thing. But the dark art is all of these founders are studying each other and they will rat each other out to the press. And there are PR people who specialize in this, like trying to rat your competitors out for doing cutting corners. Fair enough. There you go. Fair enough. That's a tactical practical tip. There you go. All right. Put a human in the loop, dot your eyes, cross your T's. Don't, I mean, it's literally like you're going a hundred miles an hour around a corner here and you don't have brakes on the car. Like what if you need to hit the brakes? This is what happens when you try to build a solo giant company without controls in place. You should just flip the car and it could be fatal. What happens right now if this is a criminal charge, right? What if this is a criminal charge and then he has to get an injunction, the FDA gets involved and you can be banned from ever doing this again? Just be thoughtful, folks. Yeah. I mean, it just seems to me like, man, a few more years flying under the radar, who cares? Just get out of it and then go, you know, fold it up and that's your company. Yeah, pull a tech bros podcast. Yeah, but now he can't do that. Now it's 18 months and sell it for 200, get your $200 million ticket. I spent 20 years podcasting. Where's my buyout? When Sam Alton buy me out. Where's my 200? Okay, we'll do it. We'll do it. Claude, if you're listening, anthropic, I was waiting. Like we talk about how much you love perplexity all the time. Where's our oven? Yeah, our oven. Buy us out. We'll be your megaphone. Anytime. Buy us out. We're friends with our oven. We'll use perplexity computer on every episode. All right. We've got it's Apple's 50th anniversary. Should we talk a little bit about Apple's 50th anniversary? Sure. It's disgraceful. They haven't come out with anything that Steve Jobs would have liked since his death. So Apple was founded on April 1st, 1976. Tim Cook shared a letter on Apple.com. Through every breakthrough, one idea has guided us that the world is moved forward by people who think different. That's because progress always begins with someone who imagines a better way, a new idea, a different path. That spirit has guided Apple from the start. So they have it. Also, Sequoia posted Don Valentine's 1977 Apple investment investment memo. He calls Apple a quote leading company in a hot biz and notes 600 K buys 10% very rich deal management questionable for this evaluation. Management question. I made Steve Jobs in fairness. Steve Jobs wasn't bathing, I think, for like two years and was eating only fruit according to the bio. He was a quirky guy, Mr. Joe. He was a quirky guy. And then was was probably on mushrooms or psychedelics with a giant beard. I mean, I don't know that he was on psychedelics, but I do remember there were a lot of discussions about the Apple management team being like very trippy, dippy at that time period. I don't know that for a fact. Somebody look it up. I think Steve Jobs said taking acid was like the most. Yes. He was a big job. There's a big proponent of like the mind opening aspects of psychedelics. And he did. I could find the quote, but he did credit it with like helping to broaden his horizon. The one other note that Sequoia did not on here, they sold their Apple stake in 1979 for six million. That got them a 40 X return on their initial 150 K investment. They wanted their their investors wanted an opportunity for liquidity. Valentine was reportedly on vacation at the time they made that sell half sell half from jobs. Taking LSD was a profound experience. One of the most important things in my life. LSD shows you that there's another side to the coin and you can't you can't remember it when it wears off, but you know it. I agree. I agree with Steve Jobs on that one, Jason. Okay, here's what you need to know. If Steve Jobs were alive today, yes, we would have Apple glasses right now. We both be wearing them. We would literally these would be Apple glasses. He would have had glasses out by now that were actually functional. That were 1499 that had been through that were on the fifth generation, not like the one point X generation that would make spectacles and whatever Facebook is. You're saying these would be like the Vision Pro. We'd all be like AR. Yeah, like Vision. Yeah, AR, but they would have been in the more like the Ray bands that Zuckerberg's making that record stuff, put it into iPhoto, etc. And they would have been Apple like, which means they would have been privacy first. They would have been awesome. And we missed out on that. Yeah. And here we go. They're slogging it out with these AR glasses that weigh 12 pounds that everybody uses and then puts on a shelf that costs $4,000. That's that's miss number one. Miss number two, they shut down the titanium, whatever this project Titan was called titanium. I can't even remember now. They shut down their self-driving car and their car. They would have either bought Tesla or they would have bought BMW Mini. It was tight rebranded it. Tight project or they would have launched an Apple car and they would be neck and neck right behind Tesla with one of the most amazing electric vehicles. And if you went to an Apple store, there would be literally a beautiful convertible and a beautiful mini van there like the ID buzz. That was taken from us. When you start the Apple car, I feel like it should make the same bong that your computer makes. Like when you hit the table, 100% percent. And what do we get instead? We get Apple play in our cars, which is just taunting. It's taunting. Number three, three. Is this three or three? Is this three or is this three? I'm doing this is how the Germans do it. That's what I'm doing like the Germans. This is for design. Since he was very inspired by German design. Syria would work. If Steve Jobs was alive right now, Syria would work. It's garbage. It's distracia. Syria is the worst. I mean, if you say to Siri, like I want to go home, even if you have home programmed into your phone, it won't know where to send. It doesn't know how to spell my last name. Yeah, it's just stupid. It doesn't know how to play music. This thing is distracia at the highest level. There is no standard at Apple anymore. They put out the schlockiest bullshit. The operating system is distracia. I have the iPhone, the thin one, the iPhone air. Yeah, nothing works. The software is garbage. It constantly is like you click on a button. The button doesn't work. It's spinning wheel of death. There is no standard for fit and finish anymore at this company. And that would be Steve Jobs would have mobilized the Siri team by now. And if you don't know the mobile me story, he dragged mobile me into meetings and how should mobile me work? They explained it and he said, well, why the doesn't it work like that? And you know what happened? He then fired them on the spot and put another group in charge of it. That should have happened with the Siri team. No offense if you're working in Syria, whatever, they should have been dismissed a long time ago. If it doesn't know how to spell the person's last name or their home address, this was a this company is being milked for the last of Steve Jobs innovations to get every last little dollar in profit out of his genius. But they have not figured out how to be geniuses. They make the MacBook incrementally better. God bless you make the studio better. God bless. But if the best you can do is AirPods and a Mac mini at a lower price or the Neo at a lower price with different colors, if colors and a lower price product is the best you can do, the company is sunk. Make something inspiring for the love of God, Apple. I mean, what do you what do you make of the argument that not on purpose, but they're sort of now well established for the AI era because they've got these computers that people like to run their AIs on. And because they didn't spend all this money making a model, they can just make a deal with Google for their model and sort of set up. Like you literally just proved my point in 2008 2009, you could pull up the Wikipedia page for Apple Silicon, please. If you look at Apple Silicon, that idea was Steve Jobs 2008 2009. And then I think the first one came out in 2018. I'm just ballparking here. 10 years later, he got off of Intel and he had his own chips. Here we go. Apple Silicon. Tell me read the first couple sentences. When did he come up with the idea? When did it first debut? This is what I'm trying to get out. I'm pulling it up right now. Here we go. The first Apple design system on a chip was the Apple A4 2010 introduced in 2010, the first generation iPad and later used iPhone for perfect. And then eventually Apple Silicon went off of Intel in 2020. Correct. So let's let this sink in. When did he start the project? So we know that it got into the iPhone in 2010. But on the desktop in 2020, when did he start the strategy of making their own silicon? If you scroll down the page, it's got to have when this was, when he started the process of development of these in covertly, or maybe somebody could just ask producer Claude. But I think this was a, I think he's made this decision internally, like in 2008, 2009, 2008, he decided we have to make our own chips. Now think about that. That was literally almost 20 years ago, I think, was the first year. Claude is saying the seeds of Apple Silicon were planted by Steve Jobs in 2008 with the P. Yes, that's what I said. The process, they in 2008 Apple bought processor company PA Semi for $278 million. And that's what gave Steve Jobs the idea that he would develop system on chips for Apple's iPods and iPhone. That was 18 years ago. Correct. Sorry, I just believe all this out, but I'm losing my mind. Okay, so if I agree, like maybe Apple stumbled into the diamond mind of Steve Jobs's brilliance in 2008 of buying this company and setting them up for this 18 years later. He made so many prescient skating to where the puck is going moves. And then that got ripped out of the company's DNA. No risk taking, no skating to where the puck is going, losing Johnny Ive. There's no product that they've released that I have been inspired by. Like at a, you know, it's just all incremental. I think they, and this is weird to say, but I think they're actually better now as a Hollywood studio than a tech hardware company. Sure. A lot of the best product coming out of Apple today is stuff like Severance and Silo. They're good at making TV shows, but I don't know. Which makes sense. Yeah. Which makes sense. Even Apple payments, Apple TV, they were working on a TV lawn. They were going to make a TV. Right. An actual television set. Yes, I remember that. I mean, Steve Jobs would have released that, right? Can you imagine having like a $5,000 Apple television that like had Siri that worked on it, and then you have your glasses and everything. I mean, I photo Apple TV is a great product. I mean, it's got to be built into No, I'm saying I would have loved an Apple TV. I like the kind of projector maybe for a theater. Like an actual television that would add on all built in. And if you're not going to be innovative, then you're obligated to buy some companies that are innovative. So why didn't they buy like Airbnb or Uber or DoorDash or an AI company, Perplexity? They should have bought some stuff with that giant war chest. If you think about the power now, if Apple owned Perplexity, what they could be doing together, it blows your mind. Like imagine if Perplexity could be built into your new Apple. Or if they had bought Tesla for $75 billion. Yeah. And that was a possibility at that time. Yeah. Or Tesla was. Plot, Selah is saying in the chat, like imagine if Apple bought Plot, then you could really get some. I mean, that would be a killer extension. You talk to Siri, it goes right to your phone. I mean, they could make the, your AirPods box could have been the Plot device where it's got enough computer in it that you just press the AirPods box. That's crazy. It's recording, it sings, you put your airpieces in, you're talking to it now. It's just somebody's got, I mean, I listen, Tim Cook did a great stewardship in terms of money and, you know, great congratulations. They printed more money than anybody. He bought Donald Trump some lovely trophies and awards. Absolutely. Fantastic, all that. But literally, he's got to go because if they, the soul of the, there's no soul to the company. He just kept Steve Jobs' vision for his existing product online. But he didn't find somebody in that company who could replicate the Steve Jobs, Johnny Ive, IDML, the platform. It just doesn't exist there. We can tell me watch or vision pro, like neither of those products are inspiring. Let's keep moving. We got to go to our weekend. Yeah, we got, it's off duty. Do you want to do some streaming recommendations before we go? Or you want to just take off? You've had enough? No, no, give me, I mean, everybody loves lawns, off duty, insert the off duty theme song here, the off duty graphics, you got something to do. It's off duty. We'll do that. Yeah, we'll do a little like a, I'll have Nana Banana make a little slide for us. Absolutely. But what do you, what do you got for, for us here? I got, I got, I got a show I've been enjoying on Netflix and a film I liked on Hulu. We'll start with the, we'll start with the Netflix show. It's called Something Very Bad is Going to Happen, Jason. There was a show I really enjoyed called Brand New Cherry Flavor a few years ago where Catherine Keener played a witch. It was sort of this weird horror show. This is from the same creator, Haley Z Boston. It's a, it's a horror show, but it's like a horror drama. It's really, like we're, I'm halfway through it and we still don't really know, is this going to take a turn into supernatural horror or is this just about an awkward family gathering? It's basically this new, this soon to be married couple goes on a road trip to her family's house and then they discover a number of sort of tragic things are actually unfolding while they're there at this weekend preparing for their wedding. It's, it's not like anything else I've seen on, on TV recently. It's very strange. And I think if you're either a fan of like family relationship drama or creepy horror, I think there's something to enjoy in this show for everybody. So I, I, I really recommend it. That's on Netflix. I saw the, the boys at the watch were talking about it. I'm not a horror fan. Right. But this isn't like there's no monsters. There's nobody being, it's not gory. It's just there's something weird about this family's like remote mansion in the woods and something is going on, but it's, it's just creepy so far and, and they're strange. Jennifer, Jason Lee and Ted Levin are the parents. It's really well acted. I, it's very atmospheric. I'm, I don't know if it's going to turn into horror yet. I'm only halfway through. All right. Listen, I'm going to give you something to get in shape. I'm going to send a message to you. Sub tweeting you, but I'm not not. This is the wolf tactical weighted training vest. Sure. This is called rocking for your rocking. Yeah. This is, I bought this, as you can see, October 15th, 2024. So I've been doing this for a while now folks, a year and a half or whatever. It's a weight vest. It puts an equal amount of weight on the front and the back and there's little, there's little weights in there that are a couple pounds each and you can very easily take them in and out of your, of your vest. So you can go down to 10 pounds if you want and you walk around like an old man and this will take you to zone two in terms of your heart rate. And for guys our age, 40s, 50s, 60s, you know, if you go running, you tweak something. I tweaked my hip flexor, groin muscle because when I was in Brooklyn, see my dad, I got on the treadmill. I got a little excited. I lost the weight, GLPs, the whole thing. I start sprinting. I pull something. Now I'm walking around. I'm like, I feel like an invalid. And if I just didn't run because I wanted to get my, my beats permitted up, I should have just been on a weight vest walking around. So I put this on, you walk around. You see a bunch of women like the yoga moms are doing this, the dad bods are doing this. I see some of this in my neighborhood in Barton Hills. There are some people walking around with their weighted vest on. Yeah. And what's great about it is you just take a hundred feet per minute walk to 120 just by putting this on. And it distributes the weight evenly front and back. And it just puts weight on your entire frame lawn. So I lost 40 pounds and then I added it back with this. So literally now I walk around and I'm like, wow, you know, even though I was a fat bastard, technical word for being 40 pounds overweight, that was like actually probably making me strong in my legs or something carrying all that weight. Now I put this back on and I'm really building my muscle back up and all your joints. So I walk, you know, I'm not on a trail. I'm off trail with this. So, you know, you're walking on uneven surfaces with the extra weight, all those joints, knees, et cetera. It works really, really well. It's good to know. It is true. You hit your 40s and all of a sudden like jogging a little bit. It doesn't feel good anymore. It used to feel fine. You would be like, okay, I'm going to spread it a little while now. It's like, oh, my ankle hurts for some mysterious reason. I'll never figure out. Yeah. And what this does is because you're hitting all these weird joints, muscles, whatever, when I ski now, because in the off season I'm wearing this and then in the on season I'm skiing, I just feel so much stronger when I'm skiing. I can't explain it, but I think you hit all the little nooks and crannies of your legaments, whatever. Another amazing week of podcasts from this weekend. And if you want to angel invest alongside me, I have a website called The Syndicate. It's TheSyndicate.com. Proud to announce we did Vast Space, which is building a new space station. That's a late stage deal. And we did ZipLine. We had Keller on the program and at Launch Festival a couple of weeks ago, we are just wrapping up that syndicate. And so we are doing late stage. Everybody knows our syndicate was doing like people coming out of our accelerator and stuff like that, $10 million, $20 million valuation comes, but we're doing billion dollar companies now. So if you want to have access to that, you got to sign up for TheSyndicate.com. There's an onboarding process. We have to be an accredited investor or a qualified purchaser. For now, eventually the SEC, as you might have heard on that SEC episode I did with Chamath on all end, they're going to have a test at some point. So I'm focusing in on The Syndicate again, TheSyndicate.com. All right, everybody, we'll see you next week. Bye-bye.