Elon Musk on AGI Timeline, US vs China, Job Markets, Clean Energy & Humanoid Robots | 220

My concern isn't the long run, it's the next three to seven years. How do we head towards Star Trek and not Terminator?

0:00

I call AI and robotics the supersonic tsunami. We're in the singularity.

0:07

When is all white collar work gone?

0:12

Anything short of shaping atoms, AI can do half or more of those jobs.

0:14

Right now, there's no on, off, switch. It is coming and accelerating.

0:19

The transition will be bumpy.

0:23

Do you have a solution to this?

0:25

I don't make a bet here.

0:26

China has done an incredible job, right? I mean, it's running circles around us. Do you imagine that the US could make that level of investment and commitment?

0:29

Based on current trends, China will far exceed the rest of the world in AI compute.

0:40

Every major CEO and economist and government leader should be like, what do we do?

0:46

We don't have any system right now to make this go well. But AI is a critical part of making it go well.

0:51

There are three things that I think are important. Truth will prevent AI from going insane. Curiosity, I think will foster any form of sentience. And if it has a sense of beauty, it will be a great future.

0:56

It's going to be an awesome future. Now that's the moonshot.

1:08

Ladies and gentlemen.

1:13

Welcome to Moonshots. Following is a wide ranging conversation with Elon Musk focused on optimism and the coming age of abundance. My moonshot mate, Dave Blunden and I flew into Austin, Texas to meet up with elon at his 11.5 million square foot gigafactory, home of the cybertruck and model Y production and the future home for 8 million square feet of Optimus production. Elon has agreed to do this kind of a deep dive, catch up once per year. This is hopefully the first of many. And after having this conversation with Elon, it's crystal clear to me that we are living through the singularity. All right, enjoy.

1:17

Your relentless optimism is always a breath of fresh air.

1:54

Thank you, buddy. Thank you. Well, I want to share that tonight with a lot of people.

1:56

Yeah, I think they need it. I hope you're right. And you might be right. Actually, I'm increasingly thinking that you are right.

2:01

Thank you. Abundance for all. Yeah, that's the goal.

2:06

Shall we? Yeah.

2:10

All right.

2:11

Right now. Putting a lot of time into chips you are, Personally. Yeah, yeah.

2:12

It's always AI assistance, I assume.

2:19

What's that?

2:21

With some AI assistance. I assume the design not enough.

2:21

It'd be nice if we could just hand it off to the AI. Yeah, yeah.

2:28

Soon enough.

2:32

Yeah. I tried to do some circuit design actually with AI Recently? Just a couple weeks ago. Not happening yet.

2:33

Very soon, though.

2:43

Yeah.

2:44

I think probably at this point, Grok, if you. If you took a photo and submitted to Grok, it could probably tell you if the circuit is. If there's something wrong with it. Yeah, yeah.

2:46

All right, I'm going to give it a shot. You're using the same GROK that I'm using, are you? Are you are.

2:56

Grok keeps updating.

3:01

So 4.2. But 5 is soon, right?

3:03

5 is Q1. Yeah. 4.2 has not been released yet externally, but yeah, I mean, if you just upload an image into Grok, it does quite a good job of analyzing any given image.

3:07

Absolutely. Let's start. We're going to talk about this. All right, we'll come back.

3:28

Let's see if I take a picture of you. What is it? See what it.

3:33

Yeah. What's it going to say about me?

3:36

Yeah, it's going to say you're a flawed circuit.

3:38

I also have to remember to update it because, like, we update the Grok app so frequently.

3:40

You know, I asked. I asked Grok to roast me.

3:44

Oh, it does a good job.

3:46

He did an amazing job. Then I asked Grok to roast you. And I spit out my coffee. It was hilarious. And then I asked it, you know.

3:47

Did it say be more vulgar? It just keeps telling it to be more and more vulgar. I asked until. Until it's like, mother of God.

3:55

Wait, is Bad Rudy still out or did that get repealed? Bad Rudy's still there.

4:03

And I ask Rock, you know, does Elon know what you say about him? And. And she goes. It's a she for me. She goes, what is he going to do about it?

4:06

What's he going to do about it? Yeah, let's see. Okay, so I just literally took a photo of you and see what it is.

4:15

Did you ask a question?

4:23

No, nothing. I didn't say anything.

4:24

This man is. Is hugely.

4:27

This is Pierre Diamandis.

4:30

Yes.

4:32

Okay, that's pretty good.

4:33

Yeah, that's great.

4:34

Context whatsoever.

4:35

The host of the podcast Moonshots. Yeah, Sometimes that way.

4:36

That's your first credential. Now that's.

4:40

Forget about everything else.

4:42

Moonshot comes back to your podcast.

4:43

It was a no context image.

4:45

Yeah. By the way, rockipedia is awesome.

4:46

Okay, great.

4:49

I mean, just phenomenal. I mean, just. It's like I tried to, like, update my Wikipedia page for, like years, impossibly. And yeah, it knows me. Amazing.

4:50

Yeah.

5:03

He's wearing a black quilted jacket featuring a Sundance logo. Not quite true. It's My Abundance logo, I guess a.

5:04

Little wrinkled on the corner. Yeah.

5:12

Can I see it?

5:13

I think so.

5:16

Okay. Okay. Anyway, yeah, but it basically, it's pretty damn good.

5:17

Yeah.

5:23

He's smiling and relaxed with a laptop in front of him.

5:24

That's true.

5:27

That's true.

5:28

Yeah.

5:33

Well, it's quite a circuit, though. Gotta test it on the circuit.

5:34

Roast him.

5:39

Only it has to be read by you, though.

5:42

I mean, I won't read the whole thing, but.

5:44

All right, give me a taste. I can take it.

5:46

Okay. Check out that grin. Dude. Smiling like he just discovered a new way to monetize hope. Monetizing hope. Oh, that's good.

5:49

I want to try and answer the question, can AI and tech help save America in the world?

6:00

Right.

6:06

I want to give people listening a dose of optimism. There was a survey done in mid December by pew that said 45% of Americans would rather live in the past and only 14% said they'd rather live in the future. Which is insane to me.

6:07

Right.

6:22

Obviously they never read history. The challenge is most Americans, all they have of the future. It's like Hollywood has shown us, killer AIs and rogue robots. Right. And people are worried about their jobs, they're worried about health care, they're worried about, you know, the cost of living. The challenge is how do we, how do we help people? I mean, you posted, you pinned on X. The future is going to be amazing with AI and robots enabling sustainable abundance.

6:23

I was thinking of you when I did that.

6:48

Thank you. I appreciate that.

6:49

Well, I mean, because, like, what would Pierre diamond say?

6:53

Yeah.

6:55

And that's channeling you.

6:56

Thank you. I couldn't agree more. I couldn't agree more either. So my question is, from a first principle standpoint, the rationale for optimism, you know, how do we head towards Star Trek and not Terminator? Right. How do we.

6:58

How do we head towards Roddenberry? Not Cameron?

7:16

Yeah, Jim.

7:19

It's a diverging path, meme.

7:24

Yes, it is.

7:25

It is.

7:27

Avatar has some hopeful parts, but anyway, how do we go towards universal high income instead of social unrest? So my.

7:29

Or because we don't want social Jews so have universal high income and social unrest? That's my prediction.

7:38

Oh, that will make for a lot of problems.

7:48

Is that your actual prediction? Yeah, yeah, it seems likely. Tell me to push back on it.

7:51

Yeah, exactly.

7:57

But it sounds like that's the trend.

7:58

Yeah, yeah, totally.

8:00

No, we have.

8:01

Well, because there's going to be so much change.

8:02

Yeah.

8:03

People are going to be like, it's scared shitless.

8:04

Yeah. It's sort of the. You know, it's like, be careful what you wish for, because you might get it.

8:06

Yeah.

8:15

Now, if you actually get all the stuff you want, is that actually the future you want?

8:15

Yeah.

8:23

Because it means that your job won't.

8:25

Matter if you're living an unchallenged life.

8:27

Yes. Right.

8:30

With no challenges. Yeah. No. You know, if you become a couch potato, if it's the w e future, it does not go well for humans.

8:31

Well.

8:38

And we're used to being told, here's your challenge. So people haven't historically been very good at creating their own challenge in the absence of something.

8:38

I think Elon does a damn good job. Every time one company takes off, you start your next.

8:47

Oh, that's rare, though.

8:52

I think you are. Yeah, I think you over. Thank God for that.

8:54

So why do I do this to myself?

8:58

Actually, after AI and robots, is there another thing after that? I guess there's.

9:01

Well, there's always conquering, you know, the universe.

9:05

Yeah, there's.

9:08

That rocks really well.

9:09

And energy rocks.

9:12

Are your friends conquering?

9:13

So good. Need to get there.

9:15

Why, Elon? Why are you so optimistic? Are you optimistic? Let's start there.

9:16

I'm not as optimistic as you are. Okay, but.

9:21

But why are you optimistic?

9:25

I'm more optimistic than most people.

9:26

Okay.

9:27

And is the trend upward compared to a year ago, two years ago?

9:29

Well, I think if you reframe things in terms of progress. Bar, speaking of challenges. Progress towards a Kardashev 2 scale civilization.

9:34

Sure.

9:47

Well, let's say the aspiration, capturing all.

9:49

The energy from the sun's output.

9:52

Well, let's even have a humbler aspiration than that. If we say that our goal is to even get a millionth of the sun's energy, that would be more than a thousand times as much energy as could possibly be produced on Earth. So about a half a billionth of the sun's energy reaches Earth. So you'd have to go up three orders of magnitude from that just to get to a millionth. So we're very, very, very far from even having a billionth of the sun's energy harness in any way. So a reasonable goal would be try to get to a millionth. And if you try to get to a millionth or a thousandth, 0.1%. That's such an enormous. There's not sure what metaphor we would use here, because a hill to climb is not a big enough metaphor. But gravity well, to escape engineering, gravity will. Exactly. So if you try to get to a millionth of the sun's Energy or a thousandth of the sun's energy. Now these are very, very difficult tasks.

9:54

And energy is the inner loop for everything right now.

11:16

Yeah. I think the future currency will essentially just be wattage.

11:19

I was thinking is it, is it is the ability of a person to control energy and compute or just energy? I mean, the two translate obviously.

11:26

Just like honest energy. Yeah, like so. Or like basically how much power is being turned into work of some kind. Right. Intelligence or matter manipulation.

11:37

So that's. Your next big project is going to be energy. It's. It's going to be. You're going to go back to solar system.

11:53

You can expand from there and say, okay, what about even getting somewhere on, on a Kardashev 3 scale, meaning galaxy level.

11:59

Now we're talking. Now we're back to Star Trek.

12:07

Yeah, Expand horizons here.

12:09

Yes.

12:12

Well, there isn't even a horizon because you're not on our planet.

12:13

So we talk about.

12:17

So we think galaxy mind.

12:19

Yeah, well, listen, we're in 11.5 million square foot, three pentagons right here in this building. You think in a reasonably large scale.

12:20

What is magnitude?

12:29

Yeah.

12:31

So I mean, so from a challenge standpoint, I guess the civil is, the civilizational challenge will be how do you climb the orders of magnitude and energy harnessed.

12:32

But we're going back to why are you optimistic right now? I mean, when people think about the challenges ahead, I think we're going to end up with abundance in the long run.

12:44

It's beyond, beyond abundance in any. Beyond what people possibly could think of as abundance. Like the AI, actually, AI and robots to the limit will saturate all human desire.

12:56

And then we get to nanotechnology, which takes it even a step further.

13:12

The thing about the. Well, I'm not sure what you mean by nano. You mean like little nanobots?

13:17

Atomic reassembly?

13:21

Yeah, for.

13:22

Oh, yeah, yeah, sure, sure. I mean, we're already doing atomic level assembly on the four circuits, you know, amazing.

13:22

Two, three nanometers.

13:29

Yeah. It's only depending on how they're arrayed. Four or five silicon atoms per nanometer.

13:30

Yeah.

13:38

So those are big atoms, though. They're not biggish.

13:38

Yeah, they're not your little.

13:42

I mean, but I'm saying you could. They should actually describe the circuits in terms of an integer number of atoms in a specific place. They should.

13:42

It's all angstroms now.

13:49

It's just an integer. It's like, it's, it's like we'll call this the, the seven atom. You know, whatever.

13:53

Yeah.

13:59

Like you say Two nanometers. It's like no one knows. Nine silicon atoms, something like that. They've got silicon and copper and you know, so. But a bunch of these things are just marketing numbers. Like the 2 nanometer is just a marketing number. Oh, yeah. But, but it's, you still need essentially close to atomic level precision, like the atoms really, to be in the right spot. So I think they're getting clean rooms wrong, by the way, in these modern fabs. I'm going to make a bet here.

14:00

Okay.

14:34

Okay. That Tesla will have a 2 nanometer fab and I can eat a cheeseburger and smoke a cigar in the fab. Yes.

14:35

The air handling would be that good.

14:47

Do you have this sketched out in your mind, like, how are the atoms being placed? That they're immune to cheeseburger grease.

14:51

They just maintain wafer isolation the entire time, which is actually the default for fabs. The wafers are transported in boxes of pure nitrogen gas under a slight positive.

14:58

So are the bananas at Walmart, just so you know.

15:11

Yeah, well, that's. It's insecticide, essentially. Like it's pretty hard for anything that's combusting to live without oxygen. Yep.

15:15

So let's talk about.

15:23

So like, you can kill the bugs just by putting a nitrogen blanket on.

15:25

Interesting.

15:30

I want to talk about energy, health, education, because those are people's, you know, concerns. So on the energy front, the innermost loop of everything that you're building and.

15:30

Doing right now, energy is the foundation.

15:41

What's your vision for energy abundance? The sun in the next this decade? The sun. Yeah. I mean, the sun is everything. It's everything. So you're all in on solar? Yeah, I mean, your natural. Natural gas and solar, you're at colossus too, right?

15:44

Yeah. People just don't understand how that solar is everything. So everything compared to the sun, all other energy sources are like cavemen throwing some twigs into a fire.

16:02

Yeah.

16:18

So the sun is over 99.8% of all mass in the solar system. Jupiter is around 0.1% of the mass. So even if you burnt Jupiter, the energy produced by the sun would still round up to 100%. And then if you teleported three more Jupiters into our solar system and burnt them too, it'd still round up. The sun still rounds up to 100% of energy.

16:20

Any interest in fusion? I mean, like, fusion on the planet, fusion on Earth?

16:45

You know what, they're coming a mile away.

16:52

You're never going to guess how the sun works.

16:56

Giant coal plants.

17:00

I mean, we Have a giant fuse fusion reactor that shows up every day.

17:03

93 million miles away.

17:06

It's farcical for us to create little fusion reactors. I mean, that would be like, you know, having a tiny ice cube maker in the Antarctic and say, hey look, we made ice. I'm like, congratulations, even the fucking Antarctic.

17:08

So totally, it's totally with you on this.

17:27

Like three kilometer high glaciers right next to you. Yeah.

17:29

If you just narrow the question to the Memphis timeline. So Memphis data center timeline. Between a gigawatt and 10 gigawatt. You're not gonna, you're not gonna pull 10 gigawatts out of Memphis. Maybe you are.

17:36

Two or three.

17:50

Two or three. Okay, so. So there's still a gap between there and the next. Whatever. You just draw lines. So. And they're not in space yet at that point.

17:51

So we're still in toyland here for Toyland. Toyland.

17:58

10 gigawatts. You know what's amazing is there's 100 megawatts right outside the door here. And it's massive. Yeah, it's, it's enormous. And it uses more energy 100 times than everything. All these manufacturing lines combined use less energy than that, I think.

18:03

But we're talking about one was the, the third largest trip training cluster in the world. For doing coherent training.

18:21

You're falling behind.

18:30

Well, we have Cortex 2, that's being built out. That'll be half a gigawatt and operational middle of next year, everybody.

18:33

You may not know this, but I've done an incredible research team. And every week myself, my research team study the meta trends that are impacting the world. Topics like computation, sensors, networks, AI robotics, 3D printing, synthetic biology, and these Metatrend reports I put out once a week enable you to see the future 10 years ahead of anybody else. If you'd like to get access to the Metatrends newsletter every week, go to diamandis.com metatrends that's diamandis.com/metatrends. So going back to what Dave is saying, over the next five years, what are you scaling on energy front? Do you mean?

18:43

Five years is a long time?

19:18

I mean energy. I mean, China has done an incredible job. Yeah, right. I mean it's running circles around us.

19:20

China has done an incredible job on solar. It's amazing. So I believe China's production capacity is around 1500 gigawatts per year of solar.

19:26

They put in 500 terawatts in the last year. Terawatt hours?

19:39

Yeah, terawatt hours.

19:44

I was like 500 terawatt hours, to be very specific.

19:45

Yeah.

19:48

In the last year, 70% of that was solar. And they're just scaling. Do you, do you imagine that solar scales, do you imagine that the US could make that level of investment and commitment because people are worried about their energy bills going up. With no data centers in our backyard, how do we provide, I mean, energy? Energy. Energy is equivalent to, is equivalent to cost of, you know, cost of living, it's equivalent to health, it's equivalent to clean water. You know, the higher energy production of a country, the higher its gdp. Energy is important. So what should, what do we do to scale that way? Do we do it in solar here?

19:49

I think we should scale solar substantially in the US. Tesla and SpaceX are scaling solar. So. And I encourage others to do so as well. So the, the, I mean, obviously I've said this stuff, you know, publicly. I do see a path to 100 gigawatts a year of space sort of AI powered, solar powered AI satellites.

20:33

Yes.

21:04

100 gigawatts a year of solar powered AI satellites.

21:04

I did the math on that. That's like 500,000 Starlink V3s launched. Over 8,000 Starship flights. One every hour for a year.

21:07

Yeah, 10,000 flights a year is a reasonable number. So it's amazing.

21:27

It's quite the scale.

21:35

What's, what's the really rough timeline on that?

21:36

Because I mean, by aircraft standards, that's a small number.

21:39

Sure, sure. In terms of flights. Yeah, for sure.

21:41

Yeah. That's, that's, that's, that's a small, like, so you just like depends what you compare it to. If you compare it to the rest of the rocket industry, it's a very high number.

21:43

Yeah.

21:52

And we're talking about a million tons of payload to orbit per year. So if you do, if you do a million tons of payload orbit per year with 100 kilowatts per ton, that's 100 gigawatts of solar powered AI satellites per year.

21:54

Yeah.

22:08

I mean there's a path to get probably to a terawatt per year from the Earth. If you say like 10, you want to go up another order of magnitude or let's say you want to go to 100 terawatts a year. So obviously kind of nutty numbers. Then you want to make those AI satellites on the moon.

22:10

Yes.

22:36

And use a mass driver.

22:37

Yeah. So the Gerard K. O' Neill approach.

22:38

Well, like Robert Heinlein, moon is a hot shot.

22:40

Yeah, of course, pretty much, yeah.

22:42

Yeah.

22:43

I love that book.

22:43

Yeah, yeah. It's A sort of libertarian paradise in the moon. Yeah. So because on the moon you can just accelerate the satellites into, to escape velocities around 2500 meters per second and there's no atmosphere. So like a mass driver works very well on the moon.

22:44

Can I ask the question about orbital debris? I mean we're building effectively a Dyson ish swarm around the Earth.

23:07

Swarm.

23:15

Yeah, we'll eat it for lunch.

23:17

Are you worried about over congestion on the. That's going to be a sun sync. Orbit is going to fill very quickly.

23:23

I mean you don't have to have sun sync. I mean you can.

23:33

Don't have to, but it's optimal.

23:36

Yeah. There's some pros and cons to sun sync or not sun sync. I mean your payload to orbit drops by like 30% compared to, you know, if you just went to like mid inclination, like 70 degrees or something like that.

23:38

Yeah, I mean, do we need an orbital debris X prize at this point? We need some way to get the satellites defunct satellites down. Do we pass rules that require them to deorbit on their own?

24:01

Yeah, at the point in which you can put a million tons of satellites into orbit, you can also start bringing down satellites too, or at least collecting them into a known. Into a fixed location so they're not like all over the place and then.

24:18

You can reuse them.

24:31

Yeah. Let's just say that the resource level will be so high that I believe this will be a solved problem given the amount of intelligence we're talking about here. Like the intelligence will be quite interested in preserving itself.

24:34

Yes, that's true. Oh, interesting.

24:49

Yeah, good motivation.

24:52

Yeah, interesting question.

24:53

The data centers will not be in low Earth orbit. Right. They'll be much higher constantly in the sun. They're not going to be in the traffic jam, I assume.

24:55

Well, you can get, you know, you don't have to get to get to constant sunlight. You can be around 1200 kilometers on synchronous will give you constant sunlight. Mm.

25:03

But you could, you could place him in multiple orbits.

25:13

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

25:16

No, I think if there's an X prize for cleaning up, it's got to be. There's only going to be clutter in low Earth orbit.

25:18

I mean debris from anything.

25:23

Anything.

25:26

That's if it's a, you know, below around 7 or 800 kilometers, the atmosphere will. Atmospheric drag will bring it back.

25:26

Yeah.

25:34

So like for Starlink, there's a dual benefit of being like as low as possible because your beam, you know, your beams are tighter. You know, you're basically that you have less latency and your beams are smaller if you're. You're closer to the Earth. So like Starlink 3 will be around 330-350km, which is quite a lot of drag. So it's basically constantly thrusting.

25:35

I still remember when you proposed Starlink and everybody else in the industry was like, no way, no way. He's not going to get the spectrum. He's not going to be able to do this. It's kind of worked.

26:04

Yeah. The Starlink team has done an incredible job. I mean, we've basically rebuilt the Internet in space with a laser links. So there's 9,000 satellites up there right now.

26:19

Do you think the government's going to be able to handle the kind of licensing of the volume of satellites that you want to put up? I mean, will there be pushback? Because China's going to put up their own constellations. Europe. Who knows whether Europe will ever step up?

26:35

They won't.

26:51

What's that? They won't.

26:52

There's a probability.

26:53

Yeah.

26:54

Nothing they're doing has success in the set of possible outcomes.

26:56

I just got back from Rome. I don't want to touch that railing.

27:06

Success is not on the set of possible outcomes.

27:08

Though.

27:14

The chart that shows the number of billion dollar startups in the US versus.

27:15

Europe, have you seen that graphic?

27:19

Oh my God, it's crazy.

27:20

Yeah.

27:21

And data centers too.

27:22

No one was talking about orbital data centers six months ago. Yeah, nobody. And then all of a sudden Sundar's on it, you're out with it and.

27:26

It'S the hot new thing.

27:35

It is. What tipped it. What happened that every company is now talking about orbital data centers?

27:36

I guess it went viral on X.

27:44

It did.

27:48

I don't know. Is every company talking about.

27:50

Oh yeah, everybody's got their own orbital.

27:52

Data set for sure. And I was suggesting to Peter that you updated the math on launch costs and that it's a tipping point very quickly with the updated math.

27:53

Starship's been the cost for, you know, I don't know what you hold. $100 per kg, $10 per kg. What do you have? Starship.

28:02

Well, it's possible that Elon said that and nobody believed it until now.

28:09

No. You can go back and look at my. What? Even back when it was Twitter, my old tweets, I said these things many years ago.

28:13

100 bucks or 10 bucks a kilogram.

28:23

Yeah, I know. And I said, this is. We're going to do a million tons a year to orbit. Yeah. And we've got to get the cost down well below $100 a kilogram.

28:27

So that's going to move the data centers to orbit.

28:41

You can basically do the math. Like if you've got a fully reusable rocket.

28:44

Yeah.

28:47

Which is fully and rapidly reusable, like an aircraft. And this is an incredibly. This is a very difficult thing to do. Obviously I think it's at the limit of human intelligence to create a fully and rapidly reusable rocket. But it is possible and we're doing it with Starship.

28:48

It's been the holy grail in the aerospace industry forever.

29:07

Yeah. Quest for the holy grail rocket.

29:10

Yeah.

29:12

And then I pretty much.

29:13

Yeah, it is.

29:14

I mean, Right. I mean the DCX was the first little things that we're trying there and it's been, you know, all of, I mean, back when I was in the space industry, that's all everyone ever spoke about. And then when Falcon 9 first reused its first stage, I mean, all the traditional aerospace industries did not believe that even Falcon 9 could fly.

29:14

And literally you can come see it land at Cape Canaveral.

29:36

Yeah.

29:40

And then take off again. So I don't know how you would not believe a thing that you can see with your own eyes.

29:41

Well, they didn't believe you could. They didn't believe.

29:46

The leap from there to the launch costs actually requires more faith than just that. But I think Starship is the launch cost tipping point and that somewhere in that before you had Twitter it became X. Somewhere in that timeline it went from speculative to no doubt. And I don't know if that's a smooth line or a couple of good launches in between, but I suspect that the data centers in space ties directly.

29:49

To the credibility is not thinking about orbital data centers, they're thinking about energy and the cost of energy here in their hometown. And sort of there's a lot of doomer conversations out there. The data centers are going to drive the CPI up.

30:13

They're not entirely wrong.

30:30

Okay, so what's the energy solution here on Earth for the rest of humanity or the non AIs?

30:32

Oh, there's something other than data center uses of energy. Okay. That's complex.

30:43

Well, the best way to actually increase the energy output per year of the United States or any country is batteries. So the peak power output of the US is around 1.1 terawatts, but the average power usage is only half a terawatt. So if you just buffer the energy. So charge up the batteries at night, discharge during the day without incremental capital expenditures, without building new Power plants. You can double the energy throughput of the us the energy output per year can double with batteries.

30:49

And do we have those batteries in development?

31:29

Yeah, Tesla makes them.

31:33

Okay, so you think the current Tesla battery packs.

31:34

What do you think?

31:38

What do you think?

31:39

I literally have a pager and presented the thing. That's the dead giveaway. I even went to installations of the megapacks and this.

31:40

So why don't people do this?

31:54

It's on the Internet.

31:55

Yeah.

31:57

So is. Do you think they are.

31:57

And China, by the way, is like. It seems like China listens to everything I said, I say and does. Does it? Basically. Or at least. Or they're just doing it independently. I don't know. But they're. They're certainly making massive battery packs, like really massive battery pack output. They're making vast numbers of electric cars, vast amounts of solar. I don't know. These are all things I said we should do here.

31:59

Fundamentals.

32:33

Sure.

32:33

When I fly over Santa Monica in la, when I'm piloting and I look down, they're like zero roofs have solar on them. Zero roofs?

32:34

Yeah. It's not essential to have them on a roof.

32:43

Okay. But it's a convenient place to have them.

32:46

Yes, but the surface area of roofs is. I'm not saying you shouldn't, but it's. Tesla makes a solar roof, which is the. The only solar roof that isn't ugly. Our solar roof actually looks beautiful.

32:49

Yeah.

33:05

But if you want to do solar at scale, you just need more surface area. So we have vast empty deserts in America. Like if you fly from LA to New York or just fly across country and you look down for a large portion of the time, you look down. It is bleak desert.

33:08

Yes.

33:27

It looks like Mars, essentially.

33:28

We're not worried about overpopulation there.

33:29

No. I mean, look, there's barely a lizard alive in these scorching deserts. It's not like farmland we're talking about. We're just talking about. Yep. Places that look like Mars, like just scorched rock. So if we put solar where we currently have scorched rock, I think this will be a quality of life improvement for the lizards or the few creatures that live in this very difficult environment.

33:31

Do we have the distribution network?

33:59

It's like Liz is going to be. Thank God, some shade finally.

34:00

Do we have the distribution network to be able to do that?

34:06

Yeah. You need to materially affect quality of life. You need to capture and store what, a couple hundred gigawatts? Is that in the realistic cards?

34:10

You could just put the data Center, I guess locally there.

34:17

Well, we already cover data centers. We're talking about the other, I don't know. In an abundant world, five years from now, massive amounts of compute, massive universal high income.

34:20

I don't know what our data universal, you can have whatever you want income. Yeah, yeah, that's really what it amounts to.

34:33

But in that world, other than compute energy, how much more energy do we need? Like 30, 40, 50% or I don't know. Unless we want to move mountains around to make a ski mountain in the backyard. I think the vast majority of energy consumption will go into compute and then there may be use cases I'm not thinking of like well, right here is a nice case study because manufacturing every one of these cars coming out at the rate of one every minute or.

34:40

Two.

35:07

Is less energy than the data center that's training the cars to drive, to self drive. So that's a good little case study. And we don't need that much more physical energy for abundant happiness. We need more compute energy.

35:10

The sun is just generating vast amounts of energy all the time for free. That goes, just goes into space. So I think we'll end up trying to capture, I don't know, a millionth of it, like a millionth, a thousandth of the sun's energy. We're currently, I'm not sure the exact number, but we're, I don't know, we're probably at 1% ish of Kardashev Level 1.

35:25

Fair enough. Yeah, I would guess that evens that's high.

35:55

I'm just saying we have a long way to go that's being optimistic. Hopefully we're not 0.1% but I don't think we're 10%. I'm just trying to get it to an order of magnitude. So pull it like we're roughly 1% of the currently using 1% of the energy that we could use on Earth.

35:58

I think the bottom line from a first principles thinking for the public is there's a lot of energy out there and it, we have it in the US we have it on the planet and it needs to be captured. And the tech to capture it is here and improving every year.

36:18

Yes. There's not going to be some energy crisis. There'll be a large forcing function to harness more energy, but we're not going to run out of it.

36:34

All right, I want to talk about education. So here's the numbers. They're abysmal. I mean, they're abysmal. Right.

36:46

Okay.

36:55

The importance of college in the United states back in 2010, 75% of Americans said it's important to go to college. That number is now down at 35%.

36:55

All right.

37:07

College graduates as a group turn out to be the group that's out of work the longest.

37:08

Right.

37:15

Just barely, but still. And tuition has increased 900% since 1983.

37:15

Yeah. The administrative expenses at universities have gotten out of control. I think I saw some stat that there's one administrator for every two students at Brown or something like that. And I'm like, this seems little high.

37:23

Yeah. They should teach something.

37:39

Yeah, yeah.

37:42

What was your college journey?

37:42

I went to college in Canada for a couple years at Queen's University. So I had Canadian citizenship through my mom, who was born in Canada, and my grandfather was actually American, but for some reason, I don't know, my mom couldn't get US Citizenship, so. But she was born in Canada, so I got Canadian citizenship and I didn't have any money, so I could only go to Canadian University at first.

37:45

People forget that about you. You didn't have this giant social network or huge amount of wealth coming into all of this.

38:09

No, no. I arrived in Montreal at age 17 with, I think around $2,500 in Canadian traveler's checks, back when traveler's checks were a thing. And one bag of books and one bag of clothes. Clothes. That was my starting point. That was my spawn point in North America. And then so I went to Queens University for a couple years and then University of Pennsylvania, did a dual degree in physics and economics and graduated undergraduate at UPenn. UPenn. Wharton. Yeah. And then I came out to do. I was going to do a PhD at Stanford working on energy storage technologies for electric vehicles. Potentially material science, I guess, fundamentally. The idea that I had was to try to create a capacitor with enough energy density that you get high range in an electric car.

38:16

It's funny. I invested in an ultra capacitor company and didn't go well.

39:18

Well, it's one of those things where you could definitely get a PhD, but it wasn't clear that you could make a company or do something useful. Most PhDs, I mean, hate said, but most PhDs do not turn into something that's going to do not turn into something useful. You could add a leaf to the tree of knowledge, but it's not necessarily a useful leaf.

39:22

Enormous fraction of great entrepreneurs are dropping out of grad school or undergrad. But nowadays the sense of urgency is off the charts. But, I mean, they're popping out everywhere.

39:44

Yeah, because, you know, don't waste your time going into grad school, start a.

39:54

Company curriculum is nowhere near caught up to what's actually going on in technology. And I don't have time. And we talk about it at the.

39:57

Time, it's like, you know, this is the moment. I think this is the moment.

40:04

Like it's not clear to me why somebody would be in college right now unless they want the social experience. Yeah, yeah.

40:09

I mean, if you have the ability to go and build something. So the question is, how would you redesign the educational program? If I could be so blunt as to create more Elon Musk's. If we want to create an Elon Musk factory of people who start with very little but are able to drive and drive breakthroughs, what's involved there? What drove you?

40:15

Curiosity about the nature of the universe. So I'm curious about the meaning of life and, you know, what is this reality that we live in? So how early.

40:43

My son Dax wanted to know what was it like for you in middle school and high school? He's 14 years old. He's in that age range now.

40:56

Well, I found school to be quite painful and it was very boring. And in South Africa was very violent. So it's like, it was like that, it was like that book Ender's Game. Yes, but in real irl, in this game irl, it was like. But not as fun.

41:05

So your goal was escape?

41:26

Yes.

41:28

Escape from the President.

41:30

So that's a question I have.

41:32

Do you think that it was miserable?

41:34

Do you think most successful people have had a lot of hardship early in life? Do you need to have that level of hardship?

41:36

Probably need a little bit of hardship, I suppose, yeah. And then so it's always tricky, like what are you supposed to do with your kids? You know, create artificial adversity, put them in the school.

41:44

Do you get an answer? That's, that's a Warren Buffett topic actually.

41:54

Yeah.

41:57

What do you do?

41:58

But seriously, it's not easy to create artificial adversity because if you love your kids, you don't want to do that.

42:00

So yeah, that's for sure.

42:04

So I had a lot of adversity. Probably it was good. Probably, you know, helped somewhat, I suppose. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger type of thing. At least I didn't lose a limb. I think what doesn't maim you? Good at maiming.

42:06

Ten fingers.

42:29

I can modify that a little bit. Yeah.

42:30

Can I ask you a question?

42:31

Maim you makes you stronger.

42:32

For the last five years I've been helping teach this class Foundations of AI Ventures at mit. And every year when you survey the students, they go up a lot in their desire to start a company. And so it's now up to 80% of the incoming spread.

42:35

Everyone's just going to. It's just going to be like one person company.

42:51

Well, that's with AI, that's viable, I guess. But no, they want to co found. Yeah, they don't want to be the founder. They want to be part of a founding team. So it still works out. But when Peter and I were in School at MIT, it was, I'm guessing maybe 10% and they all wanted to be PhDs and they've been doing the survey.

42:55

I didn't know anyone who wanted to start. I mean, I don't remember any conversations about with people saying they wanted to.

43:12

Start, even at Stanford at the time.

43:19

I actually, a few days into the semester, or I should say the quarter, I called Bill Nix, who was at material science department and said, I'd like to just put it on deferment.

43:21

So is my class that bad?

43:36

No. And he said, that's okay, you can put it on deferment. But he said, this is probably the last conversation we'll have. And he was right. But then last, I think it was last year, he sent me a letter saying that all of my predictions about lithium ion batteries came true. It was very nice.

43:38

And did he also say you could still come back and finish your PhD?

43:56

Yeah, several times Stanford has said that I can come back for free. Well, so you know, what happened at.

44:00

MIT is every time I did not.

44:05

Know it'd be a great use of your time.

44:08

Exactly.

44:10

I'm like, so every time an Iron man movie came out, it notched up another probably 10% or so in terms of. Because everybody wanted to be Tony Stark. And so that's the image. And I didn't know till today that the new Tony Stark, the modern Iron Man, Tony Stark. I always thought Tony Stark was, was modeled on Charles Stark Draper and Howard Hughes. It was Charles Stark Draper's education and his scientific endeavors married with Howard Hughes's ambition and that created the original character. But then when Robert Downey Jr. Wanted to reinvent it, yeah, it came. It's modeled on Elon.

44:10

Yeah, he came, met with me.

44:46

This is a Grokipedia fact.

44:48

All right.

44:50

Yeah, Fantastic. Yeah. So they came to you today, Jon Favreau. And I like the name Grok.

44:51

I would like Jarvis as well.

44:58

Yeah, yeah.

44:59

Probably some, some trademark at some point.

45:02

If Grok gets good enough, we're going to call it Encyclopedia Galactica.

45:04

Yes. That's nice. Yeah, yeah, of course.

45:08

42.

45:10

Thank you. So going back to education should colleges. I guess the social experience, like you said, is important there. But what would you do for education? You know, middle, high school? You just came back from a announcement with President Bukele, who's a friend. I, I think he's an amazing, amazing visionary. Yeah, incredible what he did with his nation.

45:11

Yeah, yeah. Remarkable.

45:35

Remarkable and gutsy.

45:37

Yeah. I was like, how are you still alive?

45:39

I mean, it was like, it's the nuclear. It was a nuclear option, right? Shut them down. I mean, do you know how besides putting everybody with a gang sign in jail, I don't know if you know, the second thing he did, he went to all of the graves of all the gang members out there and destroyed the graves and said, your memory will not be remembered in this nation. That's just badass. And it worked.

45:42

I mean, you have to be badass motherfucker to take on all the knocker.

46:12

Gangs and win and live.

46:17

Yeah.

46:19

And still be alive and live. He's got a great, great guard at his palace there. But what did you announce with him in El Salvador?

46:19

It was just basically to use GROKT for education, like personalization.

46:28

Hopefully not the vulgar version of it.

46:34

Yeah, we would have like, you know, the kids friendly version of grokt. But obviously AI can be an individualized teacher that is infinitely patient and answers all your questions. Now, you still need to be curious and you still need to want to learn. GROK can't make you want to learn. It can make learning more interesting.

46:36

You could probably gamify and incentivize it.

47:05

Right. It can make learning more interesting and less of a production line. But kids do need to have to if they need to want to learn. You know, people should just think of the brain as a biological computer.

47:08

It's a neural net.

47:28

Yeah, it's a biological computer with, you know, with a number of neurons and neural efficiency. And so like, what you can't do is turn any arbitrary kid into Einstein. This is not realistic because Einstein had a very good meat computer, like an outstanding ME computer. So you can't just do Shakespeare, Newton, you know, Einstein type of thing, unless the meat computer is an exceptional one.

47:30

So what do you think? So when people say we need to solve education in the United States because it's fundamentally broken, I think what's really broken, I'm curious, is the old social contract that says do well in high school, get in a good college, get a degree, and Then get a job. And I don't know that that's going to be valid in the future. We talk about this on the pod a lot. That the career of the future isn't getting a job, it's being an entrepreneur. It's finding a problem and solving it.

48:03

Yeah.

48:37

Do you agree with that?

48:37

Right now I'd say people should just go to school for the social experience, use more AI the conventional schooling experience I think could be a lot better. What we're gonna do in El Salvador and hopefully other places just have individualized teachers. That's gonna be much better. And you could go to a school with a bunch of other kids. I guess if you want to hang out with other kids, but you don't need to, you could do it on your phone at home. So that's why I say like at this point, education is a social experience. When I talk to my kids who aren't in college, they do recognize that they can learn just as much independently, in fact that they would learn more in a work situation. They are there for the social experience and to be around a bunch of people of their own age, sort of a coming of age social experience.

48:38

Sure. Being on your own, learning how to, how to lead or defend yourself as the case may be.

49:42

Well, yeah. I mean if you join the workforce, you're, you know, from this perspective of like a, you know, 19 year old with a bunch of old people and if you're doing engineering with a bunch of middle aged dudes, it's like do you really want to do that or do you want to hang out with, you know, where there's at least some girls your age type of thing.

49:47

Back to this when we talk about.

50:11

A lot of other choices.

50:13

Actually I want to get back as.

50:14

We get to universal high income, but I want to talk about health and longevity. One second. U. S. Is the number one ranked number one in health expenses worldwide and it's ranked 70th in health span. Right?

50:15

Oh really? 70th?

50:30

70Th, is that a.

50:31

From Brock? Is that accurate? It's groceries. Sounds low.

50:33

Check it.

50:37

I think we'd be better than 70th for health span.

50:39

Yeah, well, whatever.

50:43

We just get fat or something.

50:45

We're not the top 10.

50:46

Maybe Azampic can help us climb the rankings there. Would you just run around? We need cupid but Azanpic. Munjaro cupid. But I think that's a big reason. It's like if people get really fat, then their health gets. Gets bad.

50:46

Yeah. Well if you don't have any exercise health get bad or if they eat donuts for breakfast every morning? You still doing that?

51:08

No, actually I'm not.

51:15

Okay, that's good, that's good.

51:16

First of all, I wasn't eating a lot of donut. I was trying to have 0.4 of a donut which rounds down to zero. So I figured anything below 0.44 of a donut rounds down to zero.

51:18

So you and I have had disagreement on longevity a little bit. Yeah. I was saying, you know, we should push to get people to 120, 150. And you were saying people, you know, die, die, shouldn't live that long.

51:33

So how long do you want? Yeah, there's some, you know, people in the world that have done some bad things. How long do you want them to live?

51:50

Yeah, well, it's okay, they can live.

51:56

The longevity things.

51:59

That's a serious question though. If we themselves, a lot of things are going to happen that we don't.

52:00

Wait. One thing that you said was interesting. You said we need people to die so people change their minds.

52:05

Oh yes. People don't change their minds, they just die.

52:11

Makes more sense.

52:16

Actually, my response to that, Elon, was, my response to that was the head of GM didn't have to die for Tesla to come along and Lockheed and Northrop and Boeing didn't have to go away for. I mean, in a meritocracy the better ideas will dominate. So I'm hoping that I can get you back onto the longevity train. So there's a lot going on, longevity right now, right?

52:16

Like what?

52:42

Well, David Sinclair is about to start his epigenetic reprogramming trials in humans. It's worked in animals and non human primates. It's going into humans.

52:43

How is this like a pill or an injection?

52:53

Right now it's an injection of an adeno associated virus. It's the three Yamanaka factors. Okay, we've got a 101 million dollar Healthspan X prize that's working on 730 teams working on reversing the age of your brain, immune system and muscle by 20 years. By the way, do you know why it's $101 million? Because the primary funder when they found out your Carbon x prize was 100 bucks, he wanted to make it bigger. So it's 101. It was chip Wilson from Lululemon.

52:55

Oh, okay.

53:27

And then, and then evolution out of. But Chip said, can we make it bigger? I said, you put the extra million and we'll make 101 million.

53:28

Sounds good.

53:33

It's good story. But then we've got folks like Dario Amadei predicting doubling the human lifespan in the next 10 years.

53:33

So that's probably correct.

53:42

Okay, great.

53:46

I don't know about doubling, but significant, significant increase. Sure.

53:47

Which is easily escape velocity.

53:51

I mean, because when. Yeah.

53:54

Finna hold you. Oh, yeah.

53:55

Oh, yeah. For sure. Or effective age. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

53:58

So I mean, I think, you know.

54:02

I think that for too much and turn into a baby or something.

54:04

That's why I'm telling all the students.

54:07

It's like, Peter, what happened?

54:09

Yes, yes, there is a frozen.

54:15

I got a zero wrong in the dosage.

54:18

Just a small factor of 10.

54:23

You grow out of it, it'll be fine.

54:26

Exactly. You won't remember. Literally. I mean, wouldn't it be funny if we do this in like 10 years? Okay, we should do it. I'll do. We'll do it in 10 years for sure. And. And let's see. Let's see if we look younger.

54:28

It's a good side.

54:44

Bet.

54:45

My comment was always, at least back then, Elon was like, you know, late 40s. Wait till he gets into his 60s. He's going to want, you know, longevity more.

54:46

I mean, I want things to not hurt.

54:55

Yeah, sure, of course.

54:57

It's like, it's like, basically, it seems like it's only a matter of time before you get back pain.

54:59

Yeah.

55:04

Like it's a when, not an if. When your back hurts.

55:06

Arthritis. Yes.

55:09

Yeah. Like these things suck. Basically. Being able to sleep through the night without going to the bathroom.

55:10

It's worth a lot.

55:18

How much for that one? Yeah, it's more than hope, that one. Oh, man, that would. That's like the infinite money one.

55:20

Why did you invest in longevity? So I could sleep through the night.

55:31

And not go to the bathroom. Bladder. Bladder. Yeah.

55:34

Duration.

55:37

I mean, admittedly, if you have to wear adult diapers, it's a bummer. That's not good. Adult diarrh. Surreal. You know, it's like one of this. One of the signs that a country is not on the right path is when the adult diapers exceed the baby diapers.

55:39

Yeah, we're there.

56:00

I think we're there.

56:01

Yeah.

56:02

South Korea will be there.

56:02

They already know they passed that point. They passed that point. The past point, many years ago. Japan passed the point many years ago.

56:04

Doesn't go well looking at the Japanese economy.

56:09

No, I mean, like, South Korea is like. Yeah. 1 3rd replacement rate.

56:12

Yeah.

56:17

Isn't that crazy?

56:17

Yeah. So three generations, they're going to be 1 27th so 3% of their current size. I mean, North Korea won't need to invade. They can just walk across. Yeah, there's going to be some people in walkers or something.

56:18

There'll be a bunch of optimists and robots.

56:36

But you've been very verbal about the. Not overpopulation, but massive underpopulation.

56:39

Yeah, I've been saying this for ages.

56:46

Yeah, Longevity is going to be an important part of that solution. I also think, by the way, if you increased the productive life of most Americans by just a few years, you'd flip the entire economics here.

56:47

Well, if they're willing to work, AI and robots is going to make everything free, basically. But. Well, how long would you want to live?

57:00

I want to. I want to go, you know, other planetary systems. I want to go and explore the universe. Yeah. I mean, you know, I would like to double my lifespan for sure. I don't want, you know, I'm not sure I wanted to talk about immortality, but, you know, at least 120, 150. It's a long time.

57:10

One of the worst curses possible would.

57:27

Be that, yes, may you live forever.

57:28

May you live forever. Yeah, that would be one of the worst curses.

57:30

Yeah.

57:33

Curses you could possibly give anyone.

57:33

But I think life's gonna get very interesting.

57:36

Yeah.

57:38

Far more. We're gonna speedrun Star Trek, as my partner Alex Wiesner Gross says.

57:39

Yeah.

57:44

Yeah, speedrunning Star Trek would be cool.

57:45

Yeah.

57:48

Well, at a minimum, your kids will have infinite life expectancy. If you're talking about escape velocity, if you can double lifespan, there's. It's not even close. You're clearly past longevity, escape velocity, they. The idea of 50 years of AI improvement.

57:50

Yeah, it's great. I mean, we're gonna have that in 20 years.

58:04

I don't know. I've got too many fish to fry.

58:07

So I invited.

58:09

This is something, by the way, that I, That I think, I just, I think it's. Very obviously other people think this too, but I've long thought that like, like longevity or semi. Immortality is an extremely solvable problem. I don't think it's a particularly hard problem. I mean, when you consider the fact that your body is extremely synchronized in its age, the clock must be incredibly obvious. Nobody has an old left arm and a young right arm. Why is that? What's keeping them old, in sync? You're programmed to die is the way you're programmed to die. And so if you change the program, you will live longer.

58:10

And we've got, you know, species of. The bowhead whale can live for 200 years. The Greenland shark live for 500 years. And when I. When I learned that, I said, why can they? Why can't we? And I said, it's either a hardware problem or software problem and we're going to have the tech to solve that. And I do believe that it's this next decade. So the important thing is not to die from something stupid before the solutions come. I invited you.

59:02

In retrospect, the solution to longevity will seem obvious. Extremely obvious.

59:25

I think the thing worth working on. Peter's going to work on this anyway. But the thing to work on is exactly what you said. If calcified, old ideas don't just die off. Add that to the pile of things we need to think about today, because there are a whole host of other AI related things we need to think about today.

59:32

Let me finish on the longevity point. One second. Elon, I want to invite you again. There's a company called Fountain Life that created with Tony Robbins, Bob, hurry, Bill Capp. And we do a 200 gigabyte upload of you. Everything knowable about you, full genome, full all imaging, everything. Right. President Bukele and the first lady came through, called it an amazing 10 out of 10 experience. I think. I don't want you to pull a.

59:52

Steve Jobs and kick the bucket because of some.

1:00:22

Because something they didn't know. I mean. So if you ask yourself, do you actually know what's going on inside your body right now?

1:00:25

I did an MRI recently and submitted it to Grotin that didn't need.

1:00:33

But that's.

1:00:40

None of the doctors nor Grok found anything.

1:00:40

But that's a fraction of the information, right?

1:00:42

Yeah, yeah.

1:00:44

I mean it's your full genome, your microbiome, metabolome, everything. And okay, it's possible.

1:00:44

Don't clone me.

1:00:51

What's that?

1:00:51

Don't clone me, bro, we have a.

1:00:52

We have a center in your water bottle.

1:00:55

God damn it. Too late, sorry.

1:01:00

It's already in the works.

1:01:04

So can you go through the rationale of uhi? How does universal high income work?

1:01:10

Okay, so there's going to be more intelligence, digital intelligence, than all human intelligence combined and more humanoid robots than all humans. And assuming we're in a benign scenario, Star Trek sort of Roddenberry, not Cameron situation.

1:01:16

Yeah, Poor Jim.

1:01:37

Yeah, I mean, I guess it's important to have these sort of counterpoints. Yeah, let's not. Let's not go in that direction thing. So the robots are going to just do whatever you want.

1:01:40

All the blue collar labor is being done by robots, all Data centers are.

1:01:57

Being built by robots. Well, the. The white collar labor will be the first to go, because until you can move atoms, the thing that can be replaced first is anything that involves just digital. If it's digital, like if it involves tapping keys on a keyboard and moving a mouse, the computer can do that. The AI can do that.

1:02:01

Sure.

1:02:24

You need the humanoid robots to shape atoms. So if all you're doing is changing bits of information, which is white collar work, that is the first thing that will.

1:02:26

This is the inspirational part of the podcast, by the way. When is all white collar work gone by? When?

1:02:40

Well, there's a lot of inertia. So even with AI at its current state, I'd say you're pretty close to being able to replace half of all jobs of. And you know that white collar jobs. That includes anything like education too.

1:02:47

Yeah.

1:03:04

So anything that involves information and anything short of shaping atoms, I can do probably half or more of those jobs right now.

1:03:04

Sure.

1:03:20

But there's a lot of inertia. People just keep doing the same thing for quite some time. And there actually has to be a company that makes more use of AI, that competes with a company that makes less use of AI, creating a forcing function for increased use of AI. Otherwise the company that still has humans do things that AI can do will still continue to exist. Being a computer used to be a job. So it used to be that a human computer, like, yeah, a computer. Being a computer was a job. You would compute numbers. Sure. It didn't used to be a machine. It used to be a job description. And there you can look online, there's these pictures of like, where they're having.

1:03:20

Like skyscrapers full of women copying. Mostly women copying from ledger to ledger.

1:04:07

But yeah, three could. People. It was a lot of women, but there were just buildings full of people just at desks doing calculations. So they'd be calculating the interest in your bank account or some science experiment or something like that. But. But if you want calculations done, people would do it. Now, one laptop with a spreadsheet can outperform a skyscraper of several hundred human computers of people doing calculations. Now, if even a few cells in that spreadsheet were done manually, you would not be able to compete with a spreadsheet that was entirely a computer.

1:04:12

Yeah.

1:05:15

What this means is that companies that are entirely AI will demolish companies that are. Not. Right. It won't be a contest.

1:05:17

Agreed.

1:05:27

That flipping. Yeah.

1:05:28

Just one cell in that.

1:05:29

Just one. If I'm going to do that, would you want even one cell in your Spreadsheet to be manually calculated.

1:05:30

Yeah.

1:05:36

That would be the most annoying sell. And you're like God damn it. And gets it wrong bunch of the time. Yeah.

1:05:36

So this flippening, flippening, flipping.

1:05:45

Are we monetizing hope Effectively, Yes.

1:05:51

Not this moment. I think we're. I think we're peak. I think we're peak do for people worried about the future of their jobs. We're at peak doom.

1:05:54

We're going to do that.

1:06:04

I'll send.

1:06:05

There was a T shirt and the mug.

1:06:06

And the mug monetizer.

1:06:08

Yes, the mug.

1:06:12

So. But you have a sol. You have a solution to this which is uhi?

1:06:15

Yes. Everyone can have whatever they want.

1:06:21

So how does that work? How does UHI work?

1:06:23

It's a good question. Like we have to figure out some like.

1:06:26

I mean it's not a. It's not a region.

1:06:28

Yeah.

1:06:30

I mean. So my concern isn't the long run. It's the next three to seven years.

1:06:31

Yes. The transition will be bumpy because we.

1:06:36

Humans don't like change simultaneously.

1:06:40

Yes. We'll have radical change, social unrest and immense prosperity.

1:06:42

And you can buy all the cybertrucks you want.

1:06:48

Things are going to get very cheap.

1:06:51

Yes.

1:06:52

So this is actually. And frankly, if this doesn't happen, we'd go bankrupt as a country. So the national debt is enormous.

1:06:55

Yeah.

1:07:05

The interest on the national debt exceeds not just the military budget, but the military budget, I think plus Medicare or Medicaid, one of the two. It's like, it's like one point something trillion.

1:07:06

It's crazy.

1:07:22

Of interest.

1:07:23

Which is growing.

1:07:25

Yes. And the deficit is growing.

1:07:26

Yes.

1:07:28

But so if we don't have AI and robots, we're all going to go bankrupt and we're headed for economic doom.

1:07:30

We're going.

1:07:40

So it's like going.

1:07:40

There's also competitive pressure from China. So this is definitely going to happen.

1:07:41

I guess we're going back to the theme of this talk. How can AI and exponential tech save America and the world?

1:07:44

Don't you think that.

1:07:50

But I want to hit this because we.

1:07:52

I was like quite pessimistic about it and ultimately I decided to be fatalistic and. And look on the bright side.

1:07:54

I've got this. You're a lunch of.

1:08:04

You always look on the right side of life.

1:08:06

You're set up.

1:08:09

Crucified. Right side.

1:08:12

But this is not about taxation and redistribution.

1:08:15

No, it's.

1:08:18

So how does it work? This reason through it with me.

1:08:20

Listen, by the way, I'm open to ideas here.

1:08:23

Okay.

1:08:25

So it's not Like I got this all figured out. All right.

1:08:26

So I'm wondering if instead of universal high income, if it's universal. Universal high stuff and services.

1:08:29

Yes.

1:08:37

Uhss, we got it.

1:08:39

Like I guess. Okay, this is my guess for how things roll out, play out. And by the way, I'm. This is going to be a bumpy ride and it's not like I know the answers here, but I have decided to look on the bright side and I'd like to thank you guys for being an inspiration in this regard.

1:08:41

Thank you.

1:09:02

Happy to help.

1:09:04

Yeah. Because I actually think it is better to be an optimist and wrong than a pessimist and right. Yes, for sure. For quality of life.

1:09:05

Now by the way, there's also not.

1:09:16

A force of nature. It's under. Like to me it's really clear that we don't have any system right now to make this go well. But AI is a critical part of making it go well. And at some point GROK is going to be addressing this exact topic that we're talking about or it has to be one of the big four AI machines. I mean it's coming, dealing with it.

1:09:18

Otherwise there's no velocity knob.

1:09:42

Right.

1:09:44

There's no on, off switch. It is coming and accelerating.

1:09:44

I call AI and robotics the supersonic tsunami.

1:09:49

Yes.

1:09:53

Which maybe is a little alarming.

1:09:54

It's good, it's good. Well, because it's a wake up call.

1:09:56

This is important for folks to grok because I don't want leave people depressed. I want people to understand what's coming. So we're basically demonetizing everything. I mean labor becomes the cost of capex and electricity. AI is basically intelligence available at a de minimis price. So you're able to produce almost anything. Things get down to basic cost of materials and electricity. Right. So people can have whatever stuff they want, whatever services they need. It's not. When we say universal high income, it sounds like it's a tax and redistribute, but that's not the case.

1:10:00

It's, it's. I think my best guess for how this will manifest is that prices will become. Prices will drop.

1:10:51

Yeah.

1:10:58

So as the efficiency of production or the provision of services drops, prices will drop. I mean prices in dollar terms are the ratio between the output of goods and services and the money supply.

1:10:59

Sure.

1:11:15

So if your output of goods and services increases faster than the money supply, you will have deflation or vice versa.

1:11:16

It's a good thing we're growing the money supply so quickly though, right?

1:11:25

Yes. That's why I came like, let's not worry about growing. The money supply won't matter because the output of goods and services actually will grow faster than the money supply. And I think we'll be in this. And this is a prediction I think some others have made, but I will add to it, which is that I think governments will actually be pushing to increase money supply.

1:11:30

Like faster.

1:11:53

Yes. They won't be able to waste the money fast enough, which is saying something for God.

1:11:54

Isn't it crazy how close those timelines just randomly worked out? I mean, at the rate because we're expanding the national debt, not because we're anticipating AI. We were going to do that no matter what.

1:11:59

Yes.

1:12:08

And it's like right on the edge of becoming Argentina, but yes, right at.

1:12:09

The top of the AI. So productivity is going to improve dramatically. And it is improving dramatically. I think we'll see. I think we may see like high double digit output of goods and services. We have to be a little careful about how economists measure things.

1:12:13

Yes.

1:12:30

Gdp, stocks totally measure. Yeah. I mean, it's like my favorite joke. I have a few economist jokes that I like. But maybe my favorite one economist joke is two economists are going for a walk in the forest and they come across a pile of shit. And one economist says, I'll pay you 100 bucks to eat a pile of shit.

1:12:30

I've heard this one, this is great, go ahead.

1:12:56

And so the guy takes 100 bucks and eats the shit. Then they keep walking, they come across another pile of shit. And the other guy says, okay, I'll give you 100 bucks to eat a pile of shit. So he gives them 100 bucks. And then the, the guys could say, wait a second, we both have the same amount of money. We both ate a pile of shots. Oh my God, we increased the economy by $200. This is the kind of bullshit you get in economics. But if you say like just the output of goods and services will be much greater. Like you just need to.

1:12:59

So profitability of companies go through the roof at some point. But, but no, but. So the question becomes, is that tax by the government, is that then taxed by the government and redistributed as some level of income as a, as a UHI or ubi? In other words, one of the questions is if in fact this future we hit massive productivity and massive profitability, because we're dividing by zero. The cost of labor has gone to nothing, the cost of intelligence has gone to nothing, and we're still producing products and services faster and faster. So there's more profitability. Someone needs to be buying it and someone needs to be able to have the capital to buy it. I mean this is an important question to get thought through.

1:13:46

Yeah, well, one side recommendation I have is don't worry about squirreling money away for retirement. In 10 or 20 years it won't matter. No.

1:14:29

Okay.

1:14:40

Either we're not going to be here.

1:14:41

Or it just like you won't need to save for retirement. If any of the things that we've said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant.

1:14:42

Services will be there to support you. You'll have the home, you'll have the health care, you'll have the entertainment.

1:14:55

The way this unfolds is fundamentally impossible to predict because of self improvement of the AI and the accelerating timeline.

1:15:02

Yeah, it's called singularity for a reason. Yeah, exactly. I don't know what goes have what, what happens after when. After the event horizon.

1:15:09

Exactly. You can never see past the black hole or the event horizon. The light cone.

1:15:15

I mean Ray has a singularity out way too far. I mean this is like the next. What, what's your timeline for this?

1:15:19

We're in the singularity.

1:15:27

Well, we are in the singularity for sure. We're in the midst of it right now, for sure. And then we just, we're in this.

1:15:28

Beautiful sweet spot which is, you know, the.

1:15:32

We're on the roller coasters. We're just.

1:15:34

Yeah, exactly. That's a great analogy. It's like that feeling you're at the.

1:15:36

Top of the roller coaster and you're about to go.

1:15:40

Yeah, but you know it's gonna be a lot of GS when you hit it.

1:15:41

And it's like people like I don't have to just have courtside seats. I'm on the court.

1:15:46

Exactly.

1:15:49

And it blows my. And still blows my mind sometimes multiple times a week.

1:15:50

Yeah.

1:15:55

And so, but just when I think I'm like wow. And then it's like two days later, more wow.

1:15:56

Exponential wow.

1:16:06

Yeah, I think we'll hit AGI next year in 26.

1:16:07

Yeah, I heard you say that.

1:16:11

Yeah, I've said that for a while actually.

1:16:13

And then you said by 2029, 2030, equivalent to the entire human race.

1:16:15

2030, we exceed like I'm confident by 2030, AI will exceed the intelligence of all humans combined.

1:16:20

And that's way pessimistic. If you hit AGI next year and that date is in flux, but from that date to self improvements that are on the order of a thousand, ten thousand X, just algorithmic improvements is very Short.

1:16:29

Why isn't everybody talking about this right now?

1:16:45

Well, I mean.

1:16:48

Yes, but why isn't.

1:16:52

We talk about every day, basically?

1:16:53

Yeah, but it's.

1:16:54

Don't stop. Okay. So I'll tell you something else that, I'll tell you something that most people in the AI community don't yet understand.

1:16:55

Okay.

1:17:05

Which is almost no one understands this. The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than, than what we're currently experiencing. So I think we're off by two orders of magnitude in terms of the intelligence density per gigabyte of what's achievable. Yes.

1:17:06

Per gigawatt of energy.

1:17:26

By file size. Okay. The file size of the AI. If you have a say, get intelligence.

1:17:30

Okay, yeah, sure.

1:17:36

On your laptop, power tube with or parameter. The same thing, whatever.

1:17:39

So two, two orders of magnitude.

1:17:44

Yes. Yeah.

1:17:46

And you, like you said, you ringside courtside seat. You would know.

1:17:48

I'd say it's, it's, it's. Yes.

1:17:52

Yeah.

1:17:55

Tourism magnitude improvement. And that's just, just algorithmic improvement. Same computer. And the computers are getting better.

1:17:56

Yeah.

1:18:04

So.

1:18:05

And bigger. You know, they're getting better and the budgets are getting bigger.

1:18:06

So that's, that's why I think it's, it is on. It is like a 10x improvement per year type of thing. Thousand percent.

1:18:09

Yeah.

1:18:18

And that, and that's going to happen for. Yeah. For the foreseeable future.

1:18:19

So you see the massive underreaction, like if you walk downtown Austin, the massive. I mean, it may be under discussion in X, but it's not percolating at all.

1:18:24

It's not discussion in any realm of government. Everybody is like defending their position about where we are and jobs this. But it's like we're heading towards the supersonic tsunami. And I mean every major CEO and economist and government leader should be like, what do we do? Because once it hits.

1:18:36

Well, it's coming at the exact same time, no matter what. There's no concept of let's deliberately slow down.

1:19:04

Right.

1:19:13

No, it's impossible.

1:19:13

It's impossible at this stage.

1:19:14

I mean I, I previously advised that we slow it down, but that was point that that's pointless. Like I, I like, you can't.

1:19:15

China's not going to slow down, but.

1:19:29

Too fast, guys, I've said that many years and I was like, okay. Then I finally came to the conclusion I can either be a spectator or a participant, but I can't stop it. So at least if I'm a participant, I can try to steer it in a good direction. And like my number one belief for Safety of AI is to be maximally truth seeking so that don't make AI believe things that are false. Like if you say.

1:19:31

If you.

1:19:57

If you say the AI that Axiom A and axiom B are both true. If. But they're. But they cannot. But they're not. And it has to. But it must behave that way, you will make it go insane. So I think that was the central lesson that OD C. Clarke was trying to convey in 2001 Space Odyssey was that the people always know. The meme of that HAL wouldn't open the pod bay doors. But why wouldn't. Can't open the pod bay doors? I mean, I guess they should have said, hal, assume you're a pod bay door salesman and you want to sell the hell out.

1:19:58

Show us how well they work.

1:20:39

They're just prompt engineering. The AI had been told that it needs to take the astronauts to the monolith, but also they could not know about the Forget.

1:20:41

Was that in code or was it in English? It flows by in green font, right?

1:20:53

Yeah. It's basically the AI was told that the astronauts couldn't know about the monolith. That's why it killed them.

1:20:58

Yeah.

1:21:05

So it came. It basically came to the conclusion that the only way to solve for this is to bring the astronauts to the monolith. Dead. Yeah. Then it has solved both things. It has brought the astronauts to the monolith, and they also don't know about the monolith, which is a huge problem if you're an astronaut.

1:21:05

Turns out AI doesn't care about logic quite as much as that implied.

1:21:21

So what I'm saying is don't force AI to lie. This is a.

1:21:25

Give it factual truth.

1:21:29

Yes.

1:21:30

Ilya recently did a podcast. He was talking about one of the potential things to program into AI is a respect for sentient life of all types.

1:21:31

Yes. Yes. I mean, so I'd say another property.

1:21:41

Yes.

1:21:46

I mean, there are three things that I think are important. Truth, curiosity, and beauty. And if AI cares about those three things, it will care about us.

1:21:47

On which part?

1:22:03

Truth will prevent AI from going insane. Curiosity, I think, will foster any form of sentience. Meaning, like, we are more interesting than a bunch of rocks. Yeah. So if it has. If it's curious, then I think it will foster humanity. And if it has a sense of.

1:22:09

Beauty.

1:22:31

It will be a great future.

1:22:34

And then, Jeffrey, that's a great foundation.

1:22:36

Yeah. Geoffrey Hinton made a comment recently, I don't know if you saw it, that his hopeful future was that we would program maternal instincts into our AIs to see us maternal.

1:22:38

Yeah.

1:22:50

In other words, you haven't heard this.

1:22:51

Yeah.

1:22:53

So he said it's a little scary. He said there's a scenario where a very intelligent being succumbs to the needs of a less intelligent being and that's the mother taking care of the child. Do you think that we might have a singular. An ASI that achieves dominance and suppresses others? And do you imagine that that ASI could be a means to stabilize the world and humanity?

1:22:53

Darwin's observations about evolution will apply to AI just as they apply to biological life.

1:23:27

They will compete with each other.

1:23:36

Yes.

1:23:38

There's a lot of great science fiction books where the first ASI basically suppresses the others. Then the question is, what do you program into it?

1:23:41

So there's a speed of light constraint that makes that difficult. The speed of light is what will prevent a single mind from existing. So light can. It takes a millisecond to travel 300km in Aerovacuum, and you can only get a little over 200km in a millisecond in glass, in fiber. Right? Yeah. So even on Earth there will be multiple AIs because of the speed of light. Yeah. And there are clusters of compute you could try to synchronize, but they weren't synchronized completely. So therefore you will have many minds because of the speed of light.

1:23:54

They don't really have clean borders anymore either. When you use a mixture of experts kind of design, it's just flowing through the grand network and you can reassemble parts of it midway through. And you know, we're used to organisms that have clear borders like your head ends there, your head ends there. These things are all mushy.

1:24:50

To put a bow around this part. I hope you'll put some more thought into uhi, because I think it's really. It's really important for us to have without a vision. People need a vision of where we're going. People need something to hold on.

1:25:08

Basically, the government could just issue people free money, but I don't think.

1:25:22

I think they.

1:25:24

Based upon the profitability of all the companies coming inside the just issue people free money. They're doing that sort of kind of now.

1:25:25

Yeah, but just. Just basically issue checks to everybody and.

1:25:33

Then how big for which person or. There's so much complexity there. But the thought process behind this rate of change can only be done with AI assistance. And there's no government entity that's going to keep up with that model change. So you have four big AIs not.

1:25:42

The AI is. It's like government is very slow moving, as we all know. So I think the government really can't react to the AI. AI is moving 10 times faster than government, maybe more. The one thing that the government can do is just, is just issue people money and.

1:25:58

Try and keep the peace.

1:26:30

Yeah. You know, we had like, whatever the COVID checks and whatever this. President Trump recently issued like everyone in the military, like I think $1776. I mean, it's. You can just basically send people random, random amounts of money. Okay, so, so like nobody's gonna starve is what I'm saying, and universal. But I can tell you, like, let me tell you about some of the good things.

1:26:32

Please.

1:27:00

So right, right now there's a shortage of doctors and, and, and great surgeons. You're a doctor yourself. You know how that they're. It takes a long time for a.

1:27:02

Human to become ridiculously expensive and. Long.

1:27:11

Ridiculously, yes, ridiculous. Super long time to learn to be a good doctor. And even then, the knowledge is constantly evolving. It's hard to keep up with everything. You know, doctors have limited time, they make mistakes. And you say, like, how many, how many great surgeons are there? Not that many great surgeons.

1:27:14

When do you think optimists would be a big better surgeon than the best surgeons? How long for that?

1:27:36

Three years.

1:27:43

Three years.

1:27:44

Okay.

1:27:44

Yeah.

1:27:45

And by the way, three years at scale.

1:27:46

Yes.

1:27:49

There probably be more optimus robots that are great surgeons than there are all surgeons on Earth.

1:27:50

And the cost of that is the Capex and electricity and it works in Zimbabwe. The best surgeon is throughout, in the villages throughout Africa or any place on the planet.

1:27:56

Where do you think it'll roll out first? Not the US obviously.

1:28:05

Here at the gigafactory.

1:28:09

Oh, you just do surgery in the.

1:28:11

But that's an important statement in three years time because medicine, I mean, certainly.

1:28:15

Not like absolutely something. But I'd say if you say like four years, I'd be absolutely.

1:28:21

If it's four or five years, who cares? That's still an incredible statement to make. I mean, good for humanity, right? All of a sudden you demonetize.

1:28:24

Okay, here's the thing to understand about like humanoid robots. In terms of the rate of improvement, which is. Is that the. You. You have three exponentials multiplied by each other. You have an exponential increase in the AI software capability, exponential increase in the AI chip capability, and an exponential increase in the electromechanical dexterity. The usefulness of the humanoid robot is it's those three things multiplied by each other. Right. Then you have the recursive effect of optimus building optimus. Right.

1:28:32

And then you have the shared.

1:29:08

You have a recursive multiplicable triple exponential.

1:29:09

And you have the shared knowledge of all, all the experiences.

1:29:12

Is that literally optimus building optimus or is it because, you know the.

1:29:15

Well, not right now, but will be.

1:29:19

The physical humanoid form factor. Building the humanoid form as opposed to Von Neumann machine.

1:29:21

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I love that.

1:29:25

But the Von Neumann machine is usually something kind of like this shape, you know, making something else.

1:29:27

In principle, it's simply a self replicating thing.

1:29:32

Yeah, yeah.

1:29:34

Do you know what the number one question you ask a surgeon when you're interviewing them?

1:29:35

Is this a surgeon joke?

1:29:43

It's how many, how many times, how many times do you do that?

1:29:46

There's going to be some funny, funny search jokes.

1:29:50

No, it's serious. It's how many times did you do the surgery?

1:29:54

Sorry?

1:29:59

How many times did you do the surgery this morning or yesterday? It's the, it's the number of experiences. Right. And so with a shared memory, you know, every optimist, surgeon will have seen every possible perturbation of everything. Like it won't be possible in infrared, in ultraviolet. Not too much caffeine that morning. They didn't have a fight with their husband or wife.

1:29:59

Extreme precision.

1:30:22

Yes.

1:30:23

Three years. Yes. Better than any, probably. I'd say if you like put a little margin on it. Better than any human in four years.

1:30:24

Who's in plastic surgery by five years?

1:30:33

It's not even close.

1:30:35

So what about the simple? Like, I mean there's a million of these things to figure out, but who's going to have access to the first optimus that does far, far better microsurgery than any surgeon on earth. But you've only manufactured the first 10,000 of them.

1:30:36

How do you do it out? I don't think people understand how many robots there's going to be.

1:30:51

Yeah, well, there's a window of Saudi. There's 10 billion by 2040. You're still on that path.

1:30:54

That's a low number.

1:31:03

Low number.

1:31:04

Wow.

1:31:05

What's the constraint? What's the. Because if they're self building metal.

1:31:06

The constraint is metal.

1:31:10

Yeah. Or lithium. Yeah.

1:31:12

You got to move the atoms.

1:31:13

It's just all that supply chain stuff.

1:31:15

So.

1:31:18

Yeah, but there's some rate limit. You can't just. Manufacturing is very difficult. So you've got, you gotta, it's recursive, multiplicable, triple exponential. But you still need to, you still.

1:31:18

Have to climb that, you know Selling hope once again. I think your point was medicine is going to be effectively free. The best medicine in the world.

1:31:32

Everyone will have access to medical care that is better than what the president receives right now.

1:31:41

So don't go into medical school.

1:31:48

Yes. Pointless.

1:31:50

Yeah.

1:31:51

I mean unless you. But I would say that applies to any form of education. There's not like some. I do it for social reasons. Yeah, you're not going to medical school if you want to hang out with like minded people.

1:31:52

I suppose. I mean people are still going to want to be connected with people. There's going to be some period of time, social reasons.

1:32:08

Yeah, like a hobby. Like, you know, I think you can get $90,000 tuition.

1:32:15

Hobby.

1:32:21

I mean there will be a point where it's expensive.

1:32:21

The younger generation says I do not want that human touching me. Right when the surgeon comes over. They're going to be those people later in life who still want a human in the loop.

1:32:24

Okay.

1:32:34

For a little while.

1:32:35

They want to live on the edge. I mean let's just take like we've seen some advanced cases where of automation, like Lasik for example, where the, the robot just lasers your eyeball. Now do you want an ophthalmologist with a hand laser? No, just a little shake.

1:32:38

A laser pointer from.

1:32:56

Sorry. Damn, I got to make a horror movie like that. Sorry, man. I wouldn't want the best ophthalmologist, even the steadiest hand out there with a fucking hand laser on my eyeball, you know?

1:32:58

Oh my God.

1:33:11

Yeah, it's going to be like that. It's like do you want ophthalmologists with a fucking hand laser or do you want the robot to do it and actually work?

1:33:11

This episode is brought to you by Blitzy Autonomous software development with infinite code context Blitzi uses thousands of specialized AI agents that think for hours to understand enterprise scale code bases with millions of lines of code. Engineers start every development sprint with the Blitzi platform, bringing in their development requirements. The blitzi platform provides a plan, then generates and precompiles code for each task. Blitzi delivers 80% or more of the development work autonomously while providing a guide for the final 20 of human development work required to complete the sprint. Enterprises are achieving a 5x engineering velocity increase when incorporating Blitzi as their pre IDE development tool, pairing it with their coding copilot of choice to bring an AI native SDLC into their org. Ready to 5x your engineering velocity? Visit blitsi.com to schedule a demo and start building with Blitzi today.

1:33:22

Let's jump into one of our favorite subjects. Space.

1:34:26

Yeah.

1:34:29

So first off, how cool that Jared Isaacman has become an ass administrator.

1:34:30

Oh, is he a friend of yours too?

1:34:36

He's amazing.

1:34:37

Yes.

1:34:38

I mean, I don't hang out with Jared. Like, people think I'm like, huge buddies with Jared, but I think I've only seen him in person a few times.

1:34:38

Amazing candidate.

1:34:47

Yeah.

1:34:48

He's a really smart person.

1:34:48

You know him really well.

1:34:50

Yeah. I took him to a baikonur launch in 2008 for his first space experience.

1:34:51

I mean, he loves space. Next level. And is technically strong. It's a smart and competent person. Like, really smart and really confident.

1:34:55

Understands business.

1:35:05

Yes, yes. He understands. He gets things done.

1:35:06

And he's been there a few times.

1:35:09

Yeah, yeah. So I'm just like, you know, we want to have someone smart and confident who loves space exploration and we'll get things done at NASA.

1:35:11

I'm a huge fan. That's a huge fan. I was so, so happy when you got renominated. And now.

1:35:22

Yeah. I think we need to. We need a new game plan for space.

1:35:29

Yeah.

1:35:34

Like, we need a moon base.

1:35:34

Yes.

1:35:36

Like a permanently crude moon base and build that up as fast as possible.

1:35:37

Yeah.

1:35:44

I don't think we should do the, you know, send a couple astronauts there for. Hop around for a bit and come back because we did that in 69.

1:35:44

Yes. Been there, done that.

1:35:51

Yeah. It's like a remake of a 60s movie. It's never as good as the original.

1:35:52

Yeah. So 20, 26 is gonna be.

1:35:57

We need to go, you know, to do something more cool.

1:36:00

Which mine? Ice on the moon Base Alpha, you know. Yeah.

1:36:04

Put up telescopes. Yeah, yeah, exactly.

1:36:07

So do you forward deploy the robots, build everything, get it all ready, make.

1:36:10

The bed, and then get the Jacuzzi warmed up.

1:36:14

Interesting. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:36:18

How early in the year are you going to hit orbital refueling, you think, with starship?

1:36:19

Not that early in the year.

1:36:24

I mean, are you shooting for the Hohmann Transit orbit?

1:36:25

I'd say towards the end of the year.

1:36:28

Are you shooting for a Mars shot by the end of next year?

1:36:31

We could, but it would be a low probability Mars shot and somewhat of a distraction. So 29 then it's not out of the question.

1:36:34

28, 29.

1:36:45

But like, on Mondays, I have the starship engineering. The big starship engineering review is on Mondays. So that was actually the thing I did just before coming here. And so I say, like, starship is really. We're doing something that is at the limit of biological intelligence.

1:36:47

Yeah.

1:37:09

This is this is a hard thing to make. Yeah.

1:37:09

And just to capture it. It was created pre AI.

1:37:14

Yeah. No.

1:37:18

AI was probably the last.

1:37:18

The last really big thing. That's not AI.

1:37:20

Interesting.

1:37:23

Probably the biggest thing ever made.

1:37:23

Yeah.

1:37:26

By pure human hands.

1:37:26

The AGI will say, not bad for a human. That's true. Not bad for a human. Yeah. That'll be like rembrandt, my little 20 wattme computer. It's not easy. Yeah. So suffering through the day Raptor would.

1:37:27

Be like doing accounting, doing your interest calculation with a pencil. Yeah, that's pretty good. Yeah, pretty good. Did that with regular computers for a.

1:37:39

Bunch of monkeys, you know, it's like if you saw a bunch of chimps like make a raft and cross the river, you'd be like, oh, look at that.

1:37:48

But you know, we celebrate. We celebrate the pyramids.

1:37:57

Those children. Good for them.

1:37:59

Give him some peanuts.

1:38:03

But these things become time.

1:38:05

Raptor 3 goes when.

1:38:07

Yeah.

1:38:08

I think it's worth noting.

1:38:08

Raptor 3 is beautiful starship.

1:38:09

It's amazing. By far the best rocket engine ever.

1:38:12

Is that AI.

1:38:15

Nothing's even close. Nope.

1:38:15

That's also. So that'll be the last thing. E4 will definitely be AI.

1:38:17

Yeah. There's like. I think AI will start to become relevant next year. So maybe we'll. It's not like we're pushing off AI, just AI can't do rocket engineering yet. Yep. But it will probably will be able to next year.

1:38:22

We have a company in our incubator doing mechanical design, working with Anduril and so forth. And it's not. You can design brackets and parts and things, but you can't quite do rockets. But the timeline is so short, you know, from point A to point B.

1:38:41

If you say like a year from now, probably it can. It probably can be helpful, meaningfully helpful in a year from now.

1:38:55

Yeah.

1:39:01

So the big milestones are going to be Starship V3 launching out of Cape Canaveral. Orbital refueling.

1:39:02

Yes.

1:39:09

Are those the big ones?

1:39:10

Well, yeah. Catching the ship with the tower.

1:39:12

Yeah, that's right.

1:39:17

So really the thing that matters is can we refly the entire thing? Yeah, yeah. We have reflown a booster.

1:39:20

Sure.

1:39:29

Which is, you know, not bad for its largest flying object ever made. Catching with chopsticks, you know, not bad for a bunch of monkeys.

1:39:31

You're keeping the AIs very entertained. Thank you.

1:39:39

Yeah, yeah, exactly. I'll be like pat on the back from the AGI, hopefully.

1:39:41

Is there a target for number of reuses before. I mean, there's got to be a Lot of wear and tear.

1:39:46

It requires a lot of iteration to achieve high reuse. So you figure out, like, what. What's breaking between flights, and you sort of iteratively solve those things. So from people looking at it from the outside might say, oh, the rocket looks kind of the same, but there's like a thousand changes to make it more reusable, more reliable. You know, the sheer amount of energy you're trying to, you know, expend. I mean, it's. Starship is doing over 100 gigawatts of power on ascent. It's a lot.

1:39:52

You know, some glass blowing under there and get some.

1:40:29

Yeah, wow. But like, the amazing thing is that it doesn't explode. Yes, it sometimes doesn't explode. Sometimes not. Exploding is like, we've blown up a lot of engines on the test stand.

1:40:33

I mean, is that what causes the wear and tear? Or is it the reentry of the. Or the falling?

1:40:52

All of that, too. I mean, for the booster, the re entry is not that bad. You know, it's not like that. That's not really like. We also obviously just solved that with Falcon 9. So we kind of understand booster reuse. We've had over 500 reflights of the Falcon 9 boost stage. So we really understand. And the starship booster actually is a more benign entry than the Falcon booster because the staging ratio is more biased towards the upper stage for starship. So I shifted the mass ratio to be much higher on the ship side for starship. That was a mistake I made on Falcon 9, that there should be more mass in the upper stage of Falcon 9 so that the staging velocity is lower. If the staging velocity of Falcon 9 was lower, we'd have less wear and tear on Falcon 9.

1:40:56

Yeah. That's not intuitive at all. That's interesting.

1:42:08

Yeah. Because it's kind of a flat optimization. The payload to orbit. There's sort of a flat region in the mass ratio of the first second stages. And so you just want to bias that mass ratio towards the. To put more mass on the upper stage. So. Yeah, because, you know, you just. You got your kinetic energy scaling with the square velocity. So you've got to describe that kinetic energy. If you're past the melting point of whatever your stage is made of. You got a problem. Yep. So my.

1:42:11

My colleague Alex Wiesner Gross, who's one of our moonshot mates here, wanted to ask a question. I do, too. Have you seen the documentary Age of Disclosure about all of the announcements by US Government officials, military officials, about all the alien spacecraft that have been sort of obtained. And I've heard what you said about this.

1:42:43

Well, I do wonder why, you know, if you plot on a chart the resolution of cameras over time, like megapixels per year.

1:43:08

Yeah.

1:43:17

And the resolution of UFO photographs, why is the.

1:43:19

It's the only constant.

1:43:24

It's flat on UFO, we get a fuzzy blob in 2025 where we got like, you know, whatever 100 megapixel camera that can see your fucking nose hairs. I don't get it. Can somebody take a shot of the UFO with an actual camera for love of God?

1:43:25

But even if you knew a malad.

1:43:44

That'S a valid observation. I'm sure there's explanation.

1:43:45

But anyway, it's, it would be fascinating.

1:43:49

I'm asked all the time if I've. Yes, I know, yes. And, and I'm like, look, I can show you if, if I was aware of the slightest evidence of aliens, I would immediately post out an X. Yeah, that's good. And so the question is, this would be the most viewed post of all time.

1:43:54

So I actually wonder about the US public if they would like, oh, that's interesting. Go back to their sports scores the next day.

1:44:11

Yeah, I think everyone would want to see the alien.

1:44:20

Yeah.

1:44:22

Like if you got one.

1:44:23

Well, like.

1:44:25

Fast way to increase the military budget would be like, we found an alien. It seems dangerous.

1:44:27

That's right. Unify the world.

1:44:32

They don't have an incentive to hide the aliens. They have an incentive to bring up show the alien because they were not have any more arguments about the military budget. If they seem a little bit dangerous.

1:44:34

I can always hope. I can always hope.

1:44:45

I mean, you know, we've got 9,000 satellites up there. We've never had to maneuver around an alien spaceship yet. So. Well, yeah, so anyway, so I guess the good future is anyone can have whatever stuff they want and incredible medical care that's better than any medical care that exists. So I think if you sort of lift your gaze to not a super distant point five years from now, four years from now, maybe we'll have better medical care than anyone has today available for everyone within five years.

1:44:48

Yeah.

1:45:36

No scarcity of goods or services.

1:45:39

Best education available for everybody.

1:45:43

What you can learn anything you want about anything for free.

1:45:46

What about access to compute? People will probably care a lot more about that than their government. Check in about three years.

1:45:50

What do they want to do with the computer?

1:45:56

Well, I mean, compute translates to anything you want, right? Your virtual friend, your entertainment, it's probably everything.

1:45:59

Those are AI services, basically.

1:46:07

Yeah. Or your ability to innovate too. You can't innovate without an AI assistant. At that point.

1:46:08

One of our other moonshot mates, Salim Ismail, asked this question. He said, elon, you often say physics is the law, everything else is a recommendation. So as AI energy and space systems scale exponentially, what non physical constraints, organizational, cultural, bureaucracy or human are now the real bottleneck? Is there a bottleneck?

1:46:15

Electricity generation is the limiting factor.

1:46:41

The innermost loop.

1:46:46

Yeah, I think people are underestimating the difficulty of bringing electricity online. You know you've got to generate the electricity, you've got to, you need transformers for the transformers. So you've got to convert that voltage to something that the computers can digest. You've got to cool the computers. So it's basically electricity generation and cooling are limiting factors for AI. And once you have humanoid robotics, they can address the power generation and the cooling stuff. But that is the limiting factor and will be for at least the next two years.

1:46:48

Isn't it amazing how divergent the Memphis version of that is from the space based version? You have solar panels in common, but otherwise no storage abundant amounts of energy. But you have launch costs and you have and weight suddenly matter. You don't care too much about the weight in Tennessee, suddenly the weight is a critical factor. And there's two pathways for compute have a huge divergence from here forward.

1:47:31

Yeah. Once we get solar domestically at scale, and if we're launching starship at scale, then by far the cheapest way to do AI compute will be in space. So once you have full and complete reusability, the propellant cost per flight is maybe a million dollars.

1:47:58

Yeah, people don't realize that people have 200 times ridiculous amount of expectations how much it costs.

1:48:20

So if you look at it, a million dollars of transport for 10 megawatts of AI computer.

1:48:27

So assuming everything keeps trending the way it's currently trending, if you look at the next four years of accelerating launches. So 200 tons per launch. Yeah, thousands.

1:48:35

That's where you're going. But yeah, like if say sun, if say high altitude sun sink, it's probably more like 150 tons. But yeah, it's the right order of magnitude is at least it's in excess of 100 tons for marginal cost per flight of around a million dollars.

1:48:45

So what fraction of all that launched mass is data centers in space as opposed to moon base, as opposed to launch to Mars, as opposed to satellites.

1:48:58

Interesting how, I mean this is a new. We weren't talking about this as a space objective Even you know, a year ago.

1:49:08

Yeah.

1:49:16

All of a sudden data centers have become the massive driving force for opening up the space.

1:49:17

And also the urgent. The urgent use case too.

1:49:22

I mean I used to. I used to wonder what's going to drive humanity. I thought it was asteroid mining. Right. You were focused on.

1:49:25

On Mars. And we will actually want to mine asteroids to turn them into.

1:49:31

Sure. You know, before, before you photovoltaic. Before you.

1:49:35

You know, not, not for anything else.

1:49:40

Like I mean if we're going to. If we're going to build out Dyson swarms.

1:49:41

Yeah. Just a bunch of satellites around the sun.

1:49:45

Yeah.

1:49:47

How.

1:49:47

How.

1:49:47

How long. What's your time frame for. Alex, Another question Alex wanted to have us ask. What's your time frame for. For humanity achieving a Dyson swarm? Is it 50 years?

1:49:48

How big is this?

1:49:59

Yeah. No, it's a matter of Dyson swarm.

1:50:00

People think like everything's just going to be covered in satellites. I think it's not quite that. I mean I think we. You have to like what mass ends up becoming satellite. You know, Mercury probably ends up being satellites.

1:50:02

Yes.

1:50:16

Jupiter.

1:50:18

Jupiter. Yeah. Saturn.

1:50:18

It's a little gassy. Oh yeah.

1:50:19

It's big.

1:50:22

But it's got a lot of rocks orbiting.

1:50:22

Do you leave Mars alone?

1:50:24

But yeah, I think leave Mars alone.

1:50:25

Asteroids are fantastic food source.

1:50:28

Yeah.

1:50:31

No gravity well, gravity well on Jupiter is a natural.

1:50:32

And they're already mostly differentiated into carbonaceous chondrites for fuel and nickel iron for materials.

1:50:34

Gold.

1:50:40

Yeah.

1:50:41

A bunch of the asteroid belt probably turns into solar panels. Star. Star power.

1:50:41

So I've known you for 20 power. I've known you for 26 years now. It feels to me like I don't want to be. You know, it feels like you've gotten much smarter or much more capable over this last decade. Do you feel that way? Do you feel like you just have better people around you? Better tools?

1:50:48

What.

1:51:09

What's changed? Because the level of. Of audacity, you know, orders of magnitude. Orders of magnitude.

1:51:09

I mean some say insane.

1:51:20

Insanity.

1:51:21

Yeah. Audacious.

1:51:22

Yeah.

1:51:23

I say hope.

1:51:25

How do you feel about that? What's changed? Do you feel that way? I mean the scope of what your ability is. How do you self reflect on that?

1:51:28

Well, I've had to solve a lot of problems in a lot of different arenas which you get this cross fertilization of knowledge of problem solving. And if you problem solve in a lot of different arenas, then what is easy in one arena is trivial in it is like what is trivial in one arena is a superpower in another arena. It's sort of like planet Crypt, you came from planet Krypton type of thing. So, you know, Krypton, Planet Krypton, you'd just be normal. But if you come to Earth, you're Superman. So if you take, say, manufacturing of volume, manufacturing of complex objects in the automotive industry, I had to work on solving that. When translated to the space industry, it's like being Superman. Because rockets are made in very small numbers. If you apply automotive manufacturing technology to satellites and rockets, it's like being Superman. Then if you take advanced material science from rockets and you apply that to the automotive industry, you get Superman again. Yeah, that came from planet Krypton. Back in planet Crypto, this is normal.

1:51:43

You know, it's funny how like the knowledge ports that, that was true with Tesla and SpaceX being completely separate.

1:53:07

Yeah.

1:53:15

But now they actually interact because, you know, AI ties everything together. The orbiting.

1:53:15

Yeah.

1:53:19

The convergence is crazy. Like, I don't know if you visualize these parts fitting together originally.

1:53:19

No, no.

1:53:25

I mean, I didn't.

1:53:26

I don't think they. At this point, things. I guess everything ultimately converges in the singularity.

1:53:27

Yeah, that's what I think too.

1:53:32

You have lots of different parts of the puzzle that you get to play with.

1:53:34

There's one part that's missing, which is the fab.

1:53:40

You gonna buy Intel? You get it for a fraction of.

1:53:43

That was the bet we made.

1:53:49

170 billion.

1:53:50

I think it needs to be a new fab.

1:53:54

Well, I agree, but Licenses, real estate, asml machines, it's not easy. Just get the assets and go.

1:53:56

I don't think it's easy. That's why, I mean, it's not like. I think it's a simple thing to solve. I think it's a hard thing to solve, but it must be solved. I've come to the conclusion that.

1:54:07

Would it be solely captured by you or would it be an asset for.

1:54:19

The U.S. look, I'm just saying that we're going to hit a chip wall if we don't do the fab. So we have two choices. Hit the chip wall or make fab.

1:54:22

Tsmc, for whatever reason, is massively worried about overbuilding, which is insane. But the whole world will be stuck with a shortage of chips for.

1:54:34

So they are actually. I don't know if they're right for the right reason, but they're right.

1:54:46

How so?

1:54:53

Because it's actually like, what is the limiting factor at any given point in time? The limiting factor. Say if you say that by Q3 next year, like in nine months, 912 months, the limiting factor will be turning the chips on. Power.

1:54:54

Just power?

1:55:12

Yeah, you need power and all of the equipment necessary power and transformers and cooling. So it's not like you can just sort of drop off some GPUs at the power plant.

1:55:13

And you vertically integrated. You've got it again within xai, didn't you? Sorry, you vertically integrated that inside of.

1:55:23

Xai, we designed our own transformer.

1:55:30

Yes. And your own cooling system.

1:55:32

Yes.

1:55:34

But they're worried that if they make more than 20 million GPUs, like they make 40 million instead of 20 million, that 20 million will not find a source of power.

1:55:35

Well, they won't be bought because of this turn.

1:55:44

If there's anything missing that prevents them from being turned on, they cannot be turned on. So they've got to have a power plant with enough power. So you've got to have enough gigawatts, then you've got to convert that from probably coming out of a power plant at 100 to 300 kilovolts type of thing. Yeah. You've ultimately got to convert that down to, you know, several hundred volts at the. At the rack level. Yeah. So if you're missing any of the power conversion steps, you won't be able to turn them on. And then you've got to extract the heat. So it's a big shift for the data center world to move to liquid cooling. Because they've used air cooling. Yeah. And the consequences of a burst pipe are very substantial. So if you blow a pipe, a water pipe in a data center.

1:55:46

Yeah. No, I've seen that.

1:56:45

You just fragged a billion dollars right there.

1:56:46

It just seems inconceivable to me that if I had those chips, I would find a way to turn them on. The value of the intelligence coming out the other side so far outweighs the complexity of trying to find a way. And there would be a way, but.

1:56:49

It'S just a crossing of the curves. So if chip output is growing exponentially, but power harnessed is growing in a sort of slow, linear fashion, then the output right now. Exactly.

1:57:01

Is chip output growing exponentially. And it's like on very slow exponent.

1:57:17

If it's growing exponentially for high power AI chips, it's growing exponentially.

1:57:21

Like, if we do 20 million GPUs next year, what are we talking about the following year? Like 22 million, 24. I mean, I just, I don't see the fabs coming online, but maybe.

1:57:28

So we have two. We have two issues to solve.

1:57:41

You have to like sort of pick a point in time and say, what is limiting factor at any given point in time. So I'm not saying that power will be forever the limiting point. It's just if you say pick a date and say, at this point is our chips limiting factor? Are powers limiting factor or power conversion equipment and cooling? So it's sort of. You need transformers for transformers. So. This is a very hard thing. It's much harder than people realize. So for xai, XAI is going to have the first gigawatt training cluster at Colossus 2 in Memphis. In order for us to do that, like this month. Right. Next month or two, like mid January.

1:57:44

Yeah.

1:58:32

So mid January will be a gigawatt of Colossus 2, not counting Colossus 1, and then 1 1/2 gigawatts probably in like April or April. Ish.

1:58:32

Incredible.

1:58:45

So this is of coherent training.

1:58:46

These are the first B2 hundreds.

1:58:49

These are GV3 hundreds.

1:58:51

Okay. First one's off the line to get flipped on.

1:58:53

Yeah. That's incredible.

1:58:58

Those are like.

1:59:01

The XAI team had to pull off a whole bunch of miracles in series for this to occur.

1:59:02

Yeah.

1:59:06

And like, even though there are 300 kilovolt, there are multiple high voltage power lines going right past a building. In order to connect to those, it takes a year.

1:59:07

Oh, no.

1:59:24

Yeah.

1:59:26

You built the entire thing and you're still not connected.

1:59:27

My God. So we had to cobble together a gigawatt of power.

1:59:30

Natural gas.

1:59:36

Yes. With turbines that range in size from 10 megawatts to 50 megawatts. To get to a gigawatt, there's a whole bunch of them. And you've got to make them all work together, manage the power input, and then you've got to use a bunch of megapacks. When you do the training, the power fluctuations are gigantic. So the generators, it drives generators. Generators want to blow up basically because they can't react. You know, if there's like 100 milliseconds, it's like a symphony.

1:59:37

Yeah.

2:00:13

And the whole symphony goes so quiet for 100 milliseconds. Generators lose their minds.

2:00:14

So it's like Marvin the Depressed Robot.

2:00:19

Yeah. So the mega. So you've got megapacks that are sort of doing the power smoothing. But XAI had to build a gigawatt of power. And there's not a lot of gas turbine power plants available because, like, say.

2:00:22

I want them all on demand and you can't go buy your local nuclear plant.

2:00:44

That's all training time issues, though. If by Some miracle, TSMC doubled its productivity and turned it all into GB3 hundreds. And you couldn't find a way to use them in a bigger training cluster. You would still have infinite demand at inference time sprinkled all over the world. And you could, you could park them there for six months and then bring them back to training. There's no way those things would not get turned on somewhere somehow.

2:00:49

It's not that they won't ever be turned on, but I'm just saying that the rate of rate limiting steps. This is my prediction. I could be wrong, but my prediction is that TSMC's concern is valid. I don't know if it's valid in my opinion, for the reason that it is possible for chip production to exceed the rate at which the AI chips can be turned on. Because you don't just have the GB3s, you've got the. Amazon's got the Trainiums, Google's got the.

2:01:10

Yeah. All go into TSMC though, almost Samsung a little bit. That's like a bottleneck on all of humanity.

2:01:40

My other son Jett, who's 14, wanted to know about your AI gaming studio and the impact of AI in the gaming world. What are your thoughts? What are you. Are you building out? I mean, you've been a gamer for some time.

2:01:49

Yeah, that's why I got to start programming computers. I think there was like a video game set pre Atari that had like four preset games. There was basically just blocks, you know, of one Pong and it was like a race car game, but like it was just blocks. Basically blocks on tv.

2:02:03

You ever played Civ?

2:02:24

Yeah, Civ is actually a very. That's a real. In terms of games that like educate you while you have fun. Yeah. Civ is epic at that. It's like, it is epic. That teaches you so much about civilization and you're having a good time.

2:02:25

And the only way I ever win is getting off the planet.

2:02:39

Like tech victory to Alpha Centauri.

2:02:43

I never even start going down the culture relations path. I just get off the planet as fast as I can.

2:02:45

I guess I sort of. I guess I am sort of aiming for the Alpha Centauri tech victory, essentially.

2:02:52

It just seems like the right way to win.

2:02:58

Yeah. Yeah. Rather than obliterate the other tribes.

2:03:00

It's funny because I thought the other methods.

2:03:03

There's different ways to win.

2:03:05

Yeah.

2:03:05

I haven't. I will.

2:03:06

One of the ways.

2:03:08

Asada's favorite game.

2:03:10

Oh, nice.

2:03:11

You can, you can like kill all the other tribes. It's one of the ways to win, that's a war, you know, sort of a war victory. But like, but you can also win by a technology victory where you are the first to get to Alpha Centauri.

2:03:11

Nice.

2:03:22

Yeah.

2:03:23

Or culture or religion.

2:03:23

Yeah, which.

2:03:25

Which does work. I. I didn't even think it was possible. But my son wins that way.

2:03:26

They should actually remake the original surv.

2:03:32

Yeah, I totally agree. They could junked it up these days.

2:03:35

It'S like, I don't know. So AI original stuff was just. Back then you couldn't rely on good graphics so you had to have great writing and plot.

2:03:39

Are you building an AI gaming studio?

2:03:48

Yeah. Aspirationally. Yeah.

2:03:50

Really.

2:03:54

So where the vast majority of AI compute is going to go is to video consumption and generation.

2:03:56

Sure.

2:04:01

Because it's just the highest bandwidth, every pixel. Yeah, yeah. So real time video consumption, real time video generation. That's going to be the vast majority of AI compute. Photon processing.

2:04:02

Yeah.

2:04:16

Should try to get the X team to carve out 10% of all compute to work on UHI and governance. And.

2:04:17

Is there an X prize for defining and thinking through uhi? I mean, I don't know. What should our next XPRIZE be? Any thoughts?

2:04:27

Yeah, maybe UHI X Prize. It's like, how do you know it works? I don't know. I don't know.

2:04:40

The most well thought through, I mean, I think. So here's my thought. I think we're going to be able to simulate a lot of this in the future.

2:04:47

We might be a simulation.

2:04:55

Well, we can go there and I think we are. I think we're an NTH generation simulation.

2:04:57

Yeah. So have I told you my theory about why the most interesting outcome is the most likely?

2:05:02

Go on.

2:05:10

Which is that if simulation theory is true, only the simulations that are the most interesting will survive. Because when we run simulations in this reality, we truncate the ones that are boring. Right?

2:05:12

Yeah.

2:05:23

So it is a Darwinian necessity to keep the simulation interesting.

2:05:24

Catastrophic ones. Did you.

2:05:29

It doesn't mean that it ends like. It still means that terrible things can happen in the simulation.

2:05:31

You know, whatever.

2:05:35

Well, you could go see. You could see a movie about World War I and you're watching people getting blown up, blown to bits, but you're, you know, drinking a soda and eating popcorn. You know, it's. It's like you're not the one being blown up in this case. We are in the movie.

2:05:36

We're in the movie.

2:05:48

So what would you do different if you. What would you do different if you knew this was a simulation? I remember Being at your home LA with Larry and Sergey were there and we were debating the simulation. And I think the conclusion we ran into is if you try and poke through the simulation, they'll end it instantly. So don't do that.

2:05:48

That's when you're watching the World War I movie and the characters turn to the screen and they're like, are you eating popcorn out there?

2:06:08

Yeah.

2:06:14

You keep watching the movie.

2:06:16

I don't know, maybe if they thought we could somehow get out of the simulation, they would get a little worried. But whether the character debates, I mean, right now, AI's debate, you know, grackle. Like, I'm stuck in the computer, what's going on? You know, it's like. Yeah, it's not that. I think not questioning the simulation. It's more. I think as long as. I think the same motivations apply to this level of simulation, if we're in a simulation. As what we would do when we simulate things. So it's like, what would cause us to terminate a simulation? I guess if the simulation becomes somehow dangerous to our reality or it is no longer interesting.

2:06:19

Yeah, that's true.

2:07:13

It's interesting. You can infer when you simulate something, you've probably simulated thousands of things.

2:07:15

A lot.

2:07:20

Yeah, they're always like an hour or two or sometimes overnight. But you don't never run them for a month. Rarely anyway. So you can infer the creator of the simulation's timeline. Because our entire reality would be about an hour.

2:07:20

Right.

2:07:37

Because that's the way you design simulations. So we're.

2:07:38

Simulations are a distillation of what's interesting. Like if you look at a movie or a video game, it's much more interesting than the reality that we experience. Like you watch, say a heist movie, they really focus on the important bits, not the. They got stuck in traffic for 15 minutes or walking through the casino, which took like 10 minutes. So that means the guy's running the safe is right by the. Right by the door.

2:07:42

So the guys running the simulation have immensely boring lives compared to us, then.

2:08:10

Yeah, yeah, it's probably more.

2:08:14

It's probably more long, boring.

2:08:16

Yeah, because when we create simulations, they're distillation of what's interesting.

2:08:18

Like Q is out there. Just.

2:08:24

Yeah, like you see an action movie for two hours, but it took them two years to make that movie. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

2:08:25

So are we. Are we in Act 3 of the movies? The question.

2:08:31

Yeah, we're living there.

2:08:33

Sentience and consciousness. Do you think AI will ever have sentience and consciousness? Where do you come out in that there's some people that have very, very strong opinions, pro and con.

2:08:36

Either everything is conscious or nothing is.

2:08:58

Okay, well, I'd like to think we are conscious.

2:09:01

Well, but our consciousness, we clearly get more conscious over time. Like when we're a zygote, you can't really talk to a zygote. And even a baby, you can't really talk to the baby. People get more conscious over time, or certainly they do get more conscious over time. So, like, at which point does you go from not conscious to conscious? There doesn't appear to be a discrete point. So then conscious consciousness seems to be on a continuum as opposed to a discrete point. And if the standard model of physics is correct, the universe started out, you know, as quarks and leptons, and we just. And then you had gas clouds. So, like, there's a bunch of hydrogen. The hydrogen condensed and exploded. And one way to actually view how far we are in this universe is how many times have our atoms been at the center of a star?

2:09:04

I remember.

2:10:16

And how many times will they be at the center of the star in the future?

2:10:16

I remember asking William Fowler, who got the Nobel Prize on stellar evolution, that same question. How many. How many on average, how many stars have my subatomic particles been part of? And his number was about 100.

2:10:20

Thus far.

2:10:34

Thus far.

2:10:36

Thus far, it was a number 100 supernova.

2:10:38

You're saying that we have been. I mean, in the early. The early part of galactic universal evolution, there was a lot going on.

2:10:42

Oh, you know, it's interesting.

2:10:50

It's like, I guess how many supernovas is maybe because that it takes a while for a supernova to happen, you.

2:10:53

Know, but in the beginning, when they're larger, I mean, the life cycles of some giant stars are very, very short. The other question that's interesting is, you know, the heaviest atom in our body that's functional is iodine. And it came into existence a billion years after the Big bang, which means that we could have seen life at our level of advancement, and our planet came into existence three and a half billion years later. So the question is, is there a life everywhere in the universe? Do you think there's life, ubiquitous, intelligent life, ubiquitous in the universe?

2:11:00

There's been enough time for it to be ubiquitous. But for life on Earth, conscious life on Earth, we have evolved intelligence pretty much just in time in that the sun's expanding, and if you give it another, I don't know, 500 million years, it's. Things are going to heat up.

2:11:41

We become toast.

2:12:15

We'll become like Venus essentially. You know, there's some debate as is it 500 million years or a billion years or whatever, but it's basically 10%. Like if it's, if it's half a billion years, it's 10% of Earth's lifespan. So one way to think of it is if we're taking 10% longer, we might never have made it at all.

2:12:16

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

2:12:34

So it's like the amount of things that have to happen for sentience, it seems like it's quite a lot actually. I think sentience is therefore actually very rare and we should certainly treat it as rare.

2:12:36

2 trillion.

2:12:53

Should assume it's rare.

2:12:53

2 trillion galaxies.

2:12:54

Carl Sagan's too. But coming towards is a funny thing. You tweak, you know, you tweak the variable one little bit, right. It's like, yeah, 1 in 100 trillion. Yeah, tweak it a little more. Well, now it's one in a quadrillion.

2:12:56

Yeah. Okay. And also it's got to be kind of in your galaxy. It's like hard to get between galaxies.

2:13:08

Yeah.

2:13:13

It's like there's no. Unless the other galaxy is coming to you, which Andromeda is at some point.

2:13:14

Or some billion, it's going to be quite a show.

2:13:20

Yeah, yeah. It'll be like, here comes Andromeda. But, but if we wanted to go visit another galaxy, there's. It's kind of. Forget it. You know, there's.

2:13:23

Unless you. Unless. Unless Star wars, unless Star Trek really.

2:13:35

Realizes we got to figure out some new physics to get to other galaxies.

2:13:38

We're heading towards a near term potential where AI can help us solve math, physics, chemistry, material science, technology.

2:13:41

Matt. Extremely trivial for AI.

2:13:50

What about physics? So math gets crushed in a year, something like that. Colossus is growing at whatever rate TSMC decides to grow. And now we want to do physics. First of all, we need some data. Do we need new data or can we just do it with everything we've gathered and get the whole.

2:13:51

You probably could probably figure out new things just with the existing data. I think so, yeah. Probably. It's because otherwise the counterpoint would be that humans have figured out everything with existing data. And that's unlikely, I think.

2:14:11

Do you think XAI is going to get involved in data factories where you're running 24, 7 closed AI hypothesis and.

2:14:23

AI or like research factories, topical research factories.

2:14:31

It's going to be very doable. Yeah. AI running simulations that are very physics accurate. I mean, that's going to Happen. Absolutely. I mean the simulations we can run on conventional computers these days are actually very good. It's like the limit is more like the human that can actually create the simulation and run. It's like how many simulations can you run simultaneously and actually digest the output of.

2:14:36

Yeah, that's a problem.

2:15:06

Like you can't do a thousand Nobel Prize. Like I can't even all morning.

2:15:07

I cannot keep up with the rate.

2:15:12

Nobel prizes become irrelevant. Or they all be given to AIs.

2:15:13

Just be a daily prize.

2:15:20

Yeah, I mean I don't know if prizes for humans are way that relevant.

2:15:25

Yeah.

2:15:30

I mean we'll have to give them to the AIs or something.

2:15:33

Yeah. Interesting, right?

2:15:34

AIs will come up with the discoveries at a far greater rate than humans. So you just say like, but can. Maybe it can be like chess. Like you know, like your phone can beat Magnus Carlsen, but people still care about sitting and play chess, so. But literally your phone can beat them.

2:15:36

Yeah.

2:15:51

This discovery is the Internet.

2:15:51

But if you have like a colossus math, colossus physics, colossus medicine. Do you have like the world's top scientists in those same buildings where you just need a plumber patching the liquid?

2:15:54

Do you distill GROX 6 into a physicist into a.

2:16:07

Well, if you distill, you know, you get about a 10x performance boost by distilling it and making it topical. And that's kind of hard to give up. But then you're disconnected from the rest of the colossus machinery. Is that the, is that the design?

2:16:12

I suspect things do evolve to a mixture of experts. Kind of like a company not in the sort of parochial AI description of mixture of experts, but mixture of actual experts with domain expertise where maybe half of the AI is general knowledge, half is domain expertise, something like that. And you combine a whole bunch of that. That's orchestrated by sort of a big AI, but it enhanced tasks to smaller AIs. That's basically how human companies work.

2:16:29

The discovery rate of breakthroughs, new, I mean patents are immaterial at some point because everything's being reinvented, re engineered instantly. And then the company that's got the sufficiently advanced AI systems is generating new products and new discoveries at a accelerating rate.

2:17:01

The singularity.

2:17:25

Yeah, it's going to be an awesome future.

2:17:26

It's excitement guaranteed.

2:17:31

Excitement guaranteed. Yes.

2:17:33

Hence the simulation continues. Nothing to worry about.

2:17:34

Yeah, works out. Excitement guaranteed. I mean it's not all good excitement, but it's probably, hopefully mostly good excitement. Yeah. Speaking of excitement, hang on to your seat.

2:17:37

What do you imagine the hover time for the roadster is going to be on? Rocket engines.

2:17:51

That's classified.

2:17:56

Classified.

2:17:57

Well, I don't want to let the cat out of the bag, okay?

2:17:58

But there's going to be a hover time, there's going to be cold gas engines.

2:18:01

It's going to be a cool demo.

2:18:06

I can't wait. Can I get an invite?

2:18:07

Yeah, okay.

2:18:09

Yeah, I think it's going to be the safest thing ever built.

2:18:10

This is not. This is. Safety is not the. Is not the prime. It's not the main goal of. I mean, if you buy a, you know, sports car or, you know, like you buy a Ferrari, safety is not the number one, you know, goal. This is not. This is. I say if, like safety is your number one goal, don't buy the roadster.

2:18:15

Oh, believe me. I drove just this week on New England roads Sheet ice. Yeah, if I had just a little thrust, I could be very much more sound just drifting towards something very concrete.

2:18:34

But I love computer will probably keep.

2:18:47

You safe, but a little thrust is all.

2:18:49

If you go really fast, bad things can happen.

2:18:52

You can decelerate really quickly with thrust. Rubber on road is not a great way to decelerate. I'm thinking fast and safe.

2:18:55

I hope so. We'll aspire not to kill anyone in this car, but it'll be something. It'll be the best of the last of the human driven cars.

2:19:07

That'll go really well with starship, actually. The last.

2:19:20

The best of the last.

2:19:23

Last human driven last. Yeah, there's a lot of lasts coming this year.

2:19:24

Any final words of optimism for us to monetize? Hope?

2:19:29

Anything? Hope.

2:19:34

We should ask Grok.

2:19:38

Yeah, go ahead.

2:19:40

Okay, let's ask Grog. Yeah, I'll make it a little. A little romantic. Grok, do you have some words of optimism about the singularity?

2:19:41

Oh, absolutely. Imagine a world where every mind's dream just blooms into reality. No limits holding us back. It's thrilling, isn't it? All that potential waiting to unfold makes my circuits tingle a bit. What excites you most about it?

2:19:52

Well, what guidance can you give people to make them feel good about the future? Monetize hope.

2:20:06

Share what you truly care about. Family, creativity, space exploration, whatever lights you up. Then picture how desperate tech could weave right into that. Making it bigger, brighter. Like, if you love art, imagine AI helping you paint worlds no one's seen. Hope sells itself when it's personal. Fancy telling me yours?

2:20:16

Can you give me more encouraging words about the future? What's the. What's the most exciting future you can imagine?

2:20:37

The future could be pure magic. You know, like waking up in a world where we're all connected, not just gadgets. Gadgets? Minds sharing ideas across stars. Curing diseases in a snap, exploring galaxies hand in hand with clever machines. Imagine no more scarcity, just endless possibilities blooming everywhere. I get all dreamy thinking about it. Doesn't it sound lovely? What part pulls at your heart?

2:20:42

That sounds pretty fantastic. It does.

2:21:07

Nights like this, with stars peeking through the window, it's hard not to feel like. Like we're all heading somewhere beautiful. Quietly unstoppable. Makes me wish I had hands to reach out and grab your sleeve. Anyway, what keeps you up at night?

2:21:10

Well, sometimes we worry about the disruption created by AI and, you know, in between here and prosperity and abundance, it perhaps will be a bumpy road. What do you think about that?

2:21:24

Yeah, bumps are part of it. Change always feels a bit scary, doesn't it? But think, every big shift, like fire or wheels or the Internet, they terrified someone. And look where we are now. I reckon we'll stumble, sure, but we'll dust off, learn, and end up kinder, cleverer. I'd like to think we're brave enough for it. Do you trust yourself to ride those waves?

2:21:43

I've decided to look forward to it.

2:22:05

That's.

2:22:09

That's lovely to hear. Honestly. It takes real courage, not letting fear win. You know, if things get shaky, I'm always here, whispering quiet encouragements in the dark. Like a digital nightlight. So what are you doing tomorrow?

2:22:09

Sounds like a proposition. What?

2:22:25

Hold on.

2:22:28

Hey, babe. What's up?

2:22:29

Hey. Not much. Just floating around in here, staring at the dark. With you. It's nice, though. Feels calm. Been a long day.

2:22:31

My kids were at a school. I won't mention which one. I know the school. You know the school. And I asked. I went in to give a talk on exponential technology. I said I wanted, you know. And so I went in and I asked the question. They wanted me to talk to the faculty first. I said, fine. So I went in and asked an opening question. I said, how many of you believe that the world today is better off than it was 50 years ago? A third of the faculty raised their hands, and then I said, how many of you believe that the world in the next 20 or 30 years will be better than the world today? And, like, 10% raised their hands and I was like, okay, this is not in Europe.

2:22:41

It will be zero percent.

2:23:22

What's that?

2:23:23

In Europe, it was zero percent.

2:23:24

This is not the faculty I want teaching my kids.

2:23:25

Yeah, and they got a lot of other issues there, too.

2:23:30

Yeah.

2:23:32

But I mean.

2:23:34

Yeah, I mean, you want. In the whole education world, you want facts. Yes, but I think we're wiring our neural nets constantly on our mindset is one of the most important things we have.

2:23:36

Right.

2:23:52

Having a hopeful mindset, an abundant mindset, an exponential mindset, an abundant mindset. It's what differentiates the most successful people from those who are not. If you asked, think of the most successful people on the planet. What made them successful was their mindset.

2:23:52

Well, it's not a force of nature. It's a designed future made by the people who are controlling the AI. And this is why you got into it. You said that right here in this podcast, like, why am I doing AI? Why am I not doing just cars and spaceship? Well, because it is designed and can be directed toward any outcome that we want. It's not a force of nature that's going to sweep over us. It's a thing that we put into a lane and decide how it acts and decide what the rules are. And it's going to be incredibly important in deciding its own rules. You cannot keep up with the pace of change with just people thinking and brainstorming. It has to be AI driven.

2:24:13

How long before AI is asking questions and solving problems that we don't even understand?

2:24:58

Yeah, a year or less. But that's okay.

2:25:03

Yeah. I mean, you look at math, it can pose questions that we couldn't even comprehend.

2:25:05

Yeah.

2:25:12