Create your account

Analyse episodes, create alerts, spot trends before they go mainstream

Already have an account? Sign in

People

Justice Sonia Sotomayor

Mentioned in 18 analyzed podcast episodes across 10 shows

A Supreme Court Justice frequently discussed on legal analysis podcasts for her opinions on constitutional interpretation, particularly regarding Fourth Amendment privacy protections and Second Amendment regulation. Her work is examined across multiple episodes covering major cases involving tariff authority, gun rights, and law enforcement practices. Podcasters cite her legal reasoning on issues ranging from statutory interpretation to concerns about executive power and governmental authority.

Episode Appearances

Armstrong & Getty On Demand

Armstrong & Getty On Demand · Apr 10, 2026

Well Meaning Softheads

Discussed for results-oriented jurisprudence prioritizing identity and political outcomes over equal law application

Public Education Policy and Standards DeclineDEI Implementation in SchoolsGrade Inflation and Academic Accountability
View Analysis
Bannon`s War Room

Bannon`s War Room · Apr 1, 2026

Episode 5263/5264: Historial Morning SCOTUS Hearing Arguments On Birthright Citizenship; Trump Live In The Courtroom

Questioned government's allegiance-based theory and dual nationality implications

14th Amendment Citizenship Clause interpretationBirthright citizenship and jus soli doctrineSubject to the jurisdiction thereof—allegiance vs. territorial presence
View Analysis
5-4

5-4 · Mar 10, 2026

Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump

Joined Roberts majority opinion striking down tariffs

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPA) statutory interpretationPresidential tariff authority and emergency powersMajor questions doctrine application to taxation and foreign affairs
View Analysis
Advisory Opinions

Advisory Opinions · Feb 24, 2026

What’s Next After Friday’s Tariff Decision?

Joined Kagan and Jackson in rejecting major questions doctrine application to tariff authority

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariff authorityMajor questions doctrine application and consistencyStatutory construction vs. clear statement rules in delegation
View Analysis
Divided Argument

Divided Argument · Feb 21, 2026

Betty Boop or Shakespeare

Joined Chief Justice Roberts' majority opinion on statutory interpretation grounds

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) statutory interpretationMajor questions doctrine: substantive canon vs. linguistic principle vs. non-delegationPresidential tariff authority and trade policy
View Analysis
#SistersInLaw

#SistersInLaw · Feb 21, 2026

280: The Red Queen’s Revenge

Joined liberal justices in majority, arguing statute's plain language clearly prohibits tariffs without major questions doctrine

Supreme Court Tariff Decision and IEPA AuthorityMajor Questions Doctrine Application and LimitsFCC Equal Time Rule Enforcement and Political Speech
View Analysis
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts · Feb 21, 2026

Trump’s Tariffs Overturned

Joined Kagan's concurrence in tariffs case

Tariff Authority and Presidential Power Under IEPAMajor Questions Doctrine in Constitutional LawSeparation of Powers and Congressional Prerogatives
View Analysis
Advisory Opinions

Advisory Opinions · Feb 21, 2026

Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs

Joined Kagan's concurrence arguing major questions doctrine unnecessary for striking down tariff authority

Major Questions Doctrine Application to Executive PowerPresidential Tariff Authority Under IEPASeparation of Powers and Congressional Delegation
View Analysis
Law and Chaos

Law and Chaos · Feb 20, 2026

Ep 206 — Who’s Afraid of the Fourth Amendment?

Wrote prescient 2012 concurrence in U.S. v. Jones proposing mosaic theory of Fourth Amendment protection for aggregated location data.

Mandatory detention policy for immigrants and habeas corpus litigationSupreme Court elimination of nationwide injunctions and fragmentation of reliefFourth Amendment privacy expectations in digital surveillance era
View Analysis
The High Court Report

The High Court Report · Feb 9, 2026

Oral Argument Re-Listen: Wolford v. Lopez | Must Gun Right Holders Receive Express Consent?

Cited Hawaii's 200-year tradition without guns and questioned whether local customs can override national Second Amendment tradition

Second Amendment Right to Public CarryPrivate Property Open to Public AccessExpress vs. Implied Consent Doctrine
View Analysis
Divided Argument

Divided Argument · Jan 22, 2026

Bok Choy

Authored separate opinion in Coney Island Auto Parts case declining to resolve constitutional due process question

Martinization and prisoner access to federal courtsEx post facto clause and retroactive criminal punishmentSubstantive versus procedural law in diversity jurisdiction
View Analysis
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 20, 2026

Wolford v. Lopez

Cited Hawaii's 200-year tradition of no gun carrying and public opinion polls against concealed weapons in businesses

Second Amendment Right to Public CarryPrivate Property Owner Consent RequirementsHawaii Firearm Licensing Law (Act 52)
View Analysis
Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Supreme Court Oral Arguments · Jan 20, 2026

[24-1046] Wolford v. Lopez

Emphasized Hawaii's 200-year tradition without widespread gun carrying and questioned whether local customs should override national Second Amendment tradition

Second Amendment scope and private property rightsHawaii's presumptive ban on concealed carry without express consentHistorical anti-poaching laws as constitutional analogs
View Analysis
Divided Argument

Divided Argument · Jan 16, 2026

Lake Shrimp

Concurred in Case v. Montana on de-escalation considerations; dissented in Bost with Jackson

Standing Doctrine and Article III RequirementsElection Law and Candidate StandingFourth Amendment Emergency Aid Exception
View Analysis
Dateline Originals

Dateline Originals · Jan 15, 2026

The Last Appeal - Ep. 3: A Date to Die

U.S. Supreme Court Justice who dissented from denial of Robertson's emergency plea, citing actual innocence claim

Shaken Baby Syndrome Science DiscreditationWrongful Conviction in Capital CasesEvidence Preservation and Discovery Failures
View Analysis
Strict Scrutiny

Strict Scrutiny · Jan 12, 2026

S7: Debunking Trump’s Bullsh*t Legal Arguments for Invading Venezuela

Authored Bowie v. United States opinion distinguishing habeas corpus protections for federal vs. state prisoners

Transgender Student-Athlete Sports EligibilityTitle IX Sex Discrimination in EducationEqual Protection Clause and Gender Identity
View Analysis
Strict Scrutiny

Strict Scrutiny · Nov 3, 2025

S7: The Legal Battles Over Trump’s War on Blue Cities

Appeared at Boston University Law School encouraging audience to fight and dissent; wore red and white Nike dunks

Federal Militarization of Domestic Law EnforcementNational Guard Deployment Legal AuthorityICE Operations and Border Patrol Conduct in Chicago
View Analysis
What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law

What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law · Jun 10, 2025

The Return of Con Law

Supreme Court justice warning that allowing government to dump people in foreign countries ends rule of law

Alien Enemies Act constitutional interpretation and scopeExecutive power during wartime versus peacetimeDue process rights for non-citizens and undocumented immigrants
View Analysis