The Dr. Hyman Show

Office Hours: Answering Your Questions on the New Dietary Guidelines

27 min
Jan 19, 20264 months ago
Listen to Episode
Summary

Dr. Mark Hyman analyzes the new U.S. Dietary Guidelines, highlighting historic shifts toward recognizing highly processed foods as harmful, emphasizing protein for longevity and metabolic health, and acknowledging that personalized nutrition matters more than one-size-fits-all approaches. He addresses common questions about protein intake, whole grains, saturated fat context, and discusses systemic food policy changes needed to address chronic disease.

Insights
  • New dietary guidelines represent first federal acknowledgment that highly processed foods drive chronic disease, marking a paradigm shift from calorie-counting to food quality focus
  • Protein recommendations increased to 1.2-1.6g per kg body weight, reflecting shift from deficiency prevention to optimal health and longevity through muscle preservation
  • Saturated fat context matters more than quantity—harmful when combined with refined carbs/sugar, but neutral or beneficial in whole food matrices with protein and vegetables
  • Guidelines quietly introduce low-carb diets as therapeutic option for metabolic dysfunction, acknowledging carbohydrate intolerance affects ~90% of population to some degree
  • Personalization and individual metabolic response are now recognized as essential, moving away from population-average nutrition advice toward precision health approaches
Trends
Shift from nutrient reductionism to whole-food matrix analysis in federal nutrition policyRecognition of food policy and subsidies as root cause of chronic disease epidemic, not individual willpower failuresGrowing emphasis on muscle preservation and metabolic health as longevity markers, especially for aging populationsTherapeutic use of low-carbohydrate diets for metabolic dysfunction gaining mainstream medical legitimacyPersonalized nutrition and biomarker testing becoming central to dietary guidance rather than peripheralMedicare funding functional lifestyle medicine ($100M over 3 years) signals insurance reimbursement shift toward preventionUltra-processed food explicitly identified as public health threat in federal guidelines for first timeProtein reframed from minimum requirement to essential macronutrient for optimal aging and metabolic functionFull-fat dairy rehabilitation in guidelines after decades of low-fat recommendationsFood policy reform emerging as healthcare cost containment strategy at federal level
Topics
Highly Processed Foods and Chronic DiseaseProtein Requirements for Optimal HealthSaturated Fat Context and Metabolic HealthLow-Carbohydrate Diets as Therapeutic InterventionPersonalized Nutrition and Metabolic DiversityFood Policy and Agricultural SubsidiesMuscle Preservation and LongevityWhole Grains and Individual ToleranceFull-Fat vs. Low-Fat DairyBlood Sugar Control and Carbohydrate IntoleranceFunctional Medicine and Preventive HealthcareFood Labeling and Consumer TransparencyPediatric Nutrition and Palate DevelopmentMetabolic Syndrome and Pre-Diabetes ManagementMedicare Reimbursement for Lifestyle Medicine
Companies
Virta Health
Cited for ketogenic diet program reversing diabetes in 60% of cases with 90%+ medication discontinuation rates
Tufts University
Published research article 'Is Butter Back' showing saturated fat neutral for cardiovascular disease, beneficial for ...
Cleveland Clinic
Dr. Hyman's affiliated institution mentioned in podcast disclaimer regarding clinical practice
Ultra Wellness Center
Dr. Hyman's clinical practice offering functional medicine services and patient care
People
Dr. Mark Hyman
Host and primary speaker analyzing new dietary guidelines through functional medicine lens and personal clinical expe...
Daria Mozaffarian
Tufts researcher cited for 'Is Butter Back' article examining saturated fat and cardiovascular/metabolic health
Quotes
"For the first time in my medical lifetime, the government is starting to acknowledge some really hard truths. Highly processed foods are harming us."
Dr. Mark Hyman
"If you focus on what you eat, you don't have to worry about how much you eat. I never limit the amount of food I eat."
Dr. Mark Hyman
"Muscle is the currency of longevity. It's the key to health as we age."
Dr. Mark Hyman
"You cannot eat a lot of saturated fat if you are also eating a diet high in refined starches and sugars. That's really key."
Dr. Mark Hyman
"Chronic disease is a systemic problem. It's not a moral failing. There's decades of food policy that have favored cheap calories."
Dr. Mark Hyman
Full Transcript
Welcome to Office Hours. This is our dedicated 101 space to go deeper, get clear, and explore what truly moves the needle for your health. I'm Dr. Mark Heim in and each week we're going to pull back the curtain and share the insights the research to lessons that don't always make it into our conversations with guests. As at the end of the day, you are the CEO of your own health and for many of you, your family's health too. And you might not feel it all the time, but you have far more power and agency than you realize. I'm glad you're here. This episode is brought to you by FunctionHealth, empowering you to live 100 healthy years with over 160 lab tests at just $365 a year. Sign up today at FunctionHealth.com, slash Mark and use code Mark 2026 to get $50 towards your membership. Hey, everybody. I know you all heard the dietary cousins came out and or maybe didn't because it's my world. I definitely don't even know about it. I want to give you my take on it because there's a lot of buzz. There's a lot of pushback. There's a lot of arguments. And of course, the industry is furious about this because it puts them in the crosshairs by saying highly processed food is not something you should eat. Period. That's amazing. That's unbelievably revolutionary. It's something never I thought was here in my lifetime, never. So let's get into it and talk about what the government finally got right about food and some things that I was still want to tweak. Now for more than 40 years, the US dietary guidelines shape what we're told to eat by the government and during that same time, the rates of obesity, diabetes and chronic disease have skyrocketed. So when the new dietary guidelines are released, it matters a lot because it shapes all of our food programs and it also shapes other countries, food policies. And it also determines so much of what people are doing and the message about what we should be eating and what we shouldn't be eating. So for the first time in my medical lifetime, the government is starting to acknowledge some really hard truths. Highly processed foods are harming us. Food quality matters more than calorie counting. Oh my God. All calories are not the same. I never thought I would see that good. All about calories in calories out. It doesn't matter if it's from Coca-Cola or almonds. All calories are the same nonsense. And also the whole idea that there's one diet for everybody. It's just not true. Personalization matters. There's no one size fits all nutrition advice. It just doesn't work. So on the new guidelines represent real and profound progress. We still have work to do. In today's episode, I'm going to walk you through what the guidelines finally got right, where they still need to be adjusted and most importantly, how to apply them in real life without confusion or being overwhelmed. We asked you to send in your questions about the new guidelines and we received over 200 responses. Thank you very much. It was clear that you're all trying to make sense of what this actually means for your health, for your family, for the choices about food you make every single day. So after bringing them a big picture, I'm going to answer some of the most common questions you asked about protein, processed foods, fats, carbohydrates, and personalization to a functional medicine lens. Now this isn't about following another set of rules. It's about understanding how food affects your body. So you can make informed, confident choices moving forward. The biggest shift in the guidelines was for the first time ever calling out highly processed food, sometimes known as junk food or ultra processed food. Although that's kind of a messy definition. This is the most important change, a historic one. For the first time, the guidelines explicitly identify highly processed foods as a major driver of chronic disease, massive, massive change. Now they define highly processed food in simple terms, refined carbs, added sugars, chemical additives, and most fires dies in artificial sweeteners. This is not so hard to understand, right? You can read the labels, you can know it's in there. Why does this matter? Well, these foods are heavily subsidized and they're profitable. And admitting that they're harmful is both scientifically and politically revolutionary. Now the evidence is pretty clear. There amounts of highly processed food in your diet lead to obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, early death, and the list goes on. In fact, it was a big study published. I think over 32 different diseases that these contributed to. And also there are smaller, shorter term control trials. We need to beier longer trials. Show that people eat more food and gain more weight on processed diets, even when you're eating the same amount of calories and the same amount of macronutrients, like same protein fat and fiber. So there's a problem here with how these foods affect us and they're quite different qualitatively. This finally shows the conversation from how much you eat to what you eat. If you focus on what you eat, you don't have to worry about how much you eat. I never limit the amount of food I eat. I only focus on what is good for me and my body and my taste buds have shifted. My cravings are gone and that's available for anybody. The second big idea, and this is a big deal, is an emphasis on protein. Now if we understand protein, you have to understand how the previous guidelines were determined. They're determined by how much protein do you need to not get a protein deficiency disease? That doesn't mean it's the optimal amount for health. It means how much you need to get really sick. Okay, I don't care about that. I care about what's optimal. And so we've changed the amount. Protein is now longer seen as something we should be worried about eating too much of. The new target in the guidelines is 1.2 to 1.6 grams per kilo body weight. I don't know why they did that because there's people in America that don't pound. But it's somewhere around a 0.7 to 1 gram per pound of ideal body weight. It doesn't mean if you're 300 pounds, you should be 300 pounds of protein. If your ideal body weight is 150, that's not your eating. The focus really shifts from deficiency prevention to optimal health. And why does this matter? Well, muscle is the currency of longevity. It's the key to health as we age. It's how we run our metabolism or blood sugar control. It's essential for preventing frailty and early death and so many things hip fractures on and on and on. So building muscle is key, keeping muscle is key, especially as we age. And we just are not doing that. And so that's really important. Muscle also helps you control your blood sugar. The better muscle you have, the healthier muscle you have, the better your blood sugar control is because it's a sink for your blood sugar. And protein also makes you feel full. It doesn't cause cravings. It actually causes you feeling full and it stops the cravings. And by the way, there's something called the thermogenic effect of protein, meaning you burn more calories, metabolizing protein than you do sugars or carbs or fats. And it's just so important for all the aging longevity, really important. Now, the upper range is for people who are doing strain training. If you want to be eating the 1.6, it's for people with strain training or people with pregnant. But most people do find with 1.2 or around that. It's really, really important because if you just over-over eat protein, it can turn to sugar in your body. So you've got a strain train to actually make more muscle. So it's includes animal plant proteins. You want to focus on physiology over ideology. And this is a huge win for metabolic health. It's a huge win for our aging population. It's just a big shift. And the next big idea, it's really important, is the end officially of the low fat era. And in the last guidelines, they said we shouldn't worry about fat, but they said, eat low fat dairy. Doesn't make sense. There's no evidence for that. In fact, there's evidence that it's worse for you to skim milk or have nonfat dairy. Food doesn't really act in isolation. It's us about fat grams or cholesterol numbers. It's really about how the whole food interacts with your metabolism, your gut, and your hormone. So what do we now change? Full fat dairy is in low fat or nonfat dairy is out. We also have quietly kind of retreated from this fear around saturated fat. Still personalized and it's important. I think there were some nuances that they didn't quite get right. But bottom line is that we shouldn't fear saturated fat so much. And that science shows that full fat dairy is linked to neutral or even metabolic consequences that are better. In fact, there was a great article published through Tufts and Daria Smysafarian entitled is Butter Back. And it shows that actually it was neutral in terms of cardiovascular disease and it was beneficial in terms of diabetes. So cheese is not the same as processed meat in terms of your diet. You want to make sure that you're eating quality saturated fat from ideally grass-fed or regenerated animals or good quality organic cheese and so forth. And yogurt, not nonfat yogurt, not sweetened yogurt, but plain yogurt, ideally Greek yogurt, which is iron protein, is not the same as sugar, sweetened, dairy, substitutes. Okay, what's missing? Oh, well, saturated fat limits remain. And I think there's some nuances there on personalization. Some people do really, really well with saturated fat. And as a doctor, we've seen tens of thousands of patients. It's really humbling because you read something in a book or in a study and then you go, wait a minute, it doesn't apply to everybody and you realize there's a lot of nuance here that depends on your genetics. It depends on your response to saturated fat. Some patients of mine have dropped their cholesterol 100 points by eating tons of butter and coconut and it's normal, which is saturated fat. And others have done exactly the same and their numbers go crazy bad. So it's really about personalization and your metabolic health. So food isn't just like a nutrient isolation, it's how the whole food matrix behaves in the body. That's really important. The next big idea that was in these guidelines was a certain metabolic reality, which it probably was underappreciated. It was a single sentence, but it's revolutionary, which is this. Some people with chronic disease may benefit from lower carbohydrate diets. Okay, this is a big sentence and it's sort of in there quietly, but if you know what you're reading, it's revolutionary. That's never been said before and we have a carbohydrate intolerant population. What I mean, carbohydrates, I don't mean broccoli, I don't mean nuts, I don't mean seeds, I don't mean brown rice, I mean sugar and starch. And why is this so important? It's a type of diabetes in metabolic issues, pre-diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or not calorie problems. There are a lot of carbohydrate intolerance and hormonal dysregulation. Too much insulin drives all this and it affects 90% of the population in some way or another. That's huge. So it's really important to understand that this is a revolutionary sentence. So car restriction is clear, then it improves glycemic control. Now the Verda Health is a incredible company. I have nothing to do with it, but their data is compelling. They use ketogenic diets, which is basically 75% fat, 5% carbs, and the rest protein. And our reversing diabetes at a revolutionary rate, better than even gastric bypass. But diabetes and revision at 60% of cases get people off insulin most of the time, over 90%, 90%, 100% get off some of the main diabetes medications. Really, really important. So the beautiful thing about the psychiatric analysis is like there's one dad for everybody, but it acknowledges that personalization matters that were all different than this biological diversity. Now get this, almost 80% of people abandon their nearest resolutions by February. After decades in medicine, here's what I learned. Real change doesn't come from willpower alone. It comes from understanding what's actually happening inside your body. Weight loss issues could be linked to leptin resistance. Immigration could be linked to thyroid dysfunction. And I've seen it so many times. Someone feels great, energized, eating clean, crushing their workouts. Then their labs tell a different story. Siling inflammation, hormone imbalances, nutrient deficiencies, you can't feel, until they become problems you can't ignore. And that's why we build function. Give you access to over 160 lab tests for your heart, your hormones, metabolism, nutrients, toxins, and lots more, trusted by hundreds of thousands of members for $365 a year. So this year, don't rely on guesswork, get your data, track what matters, and make resolutions based on your biology. Start your path to 100 healthy years at functionhealth.com. Now where the guidelines still fall a little bit short is again around the saturated fat. I think there's some nuances here about personalization and about genetics. It's kept at 10%. There's not really strong causal evidence, meaning randomized controlled trials that show it's really bad in the right context. But there's a couple of very, very, very, very, very, very important things. So listen up guys. If you eat saturated fat, butter, meat, coconut oil, etc. Full fat dairy, whatever. In the context of a diet that's also high in starch and sugar, it's a big problem. So you can eat saturated fat, but you can't eat it with starch and sugar in your diet. You can't eat it if you're eating that too because then you get into real problems with your cholesterol and your heart disease risk and your diabetes risk. So context matters, what replace it matters, foods first matters, metabolic health matters. Just remember, you cannot eat a lot of saturated fat. If you are also eating a diet high in refined starches and sugars, that's really key. All right. So what else? Whole grains are recommended. Pretty good. It's important, but the previous guidelines were like, eat some whole grains, but it's okay if you eat half your diet in white flour. Well, that's crazy. So they recommend whole grains primarily. It's really important. They didn't really address that some people, even whole grains may not be okay. If you're diabetic, for example, you might do better without them. The next point I want to make here is that in the guidelines that dairy was treated as universally beneficial, it says, choose dairy, three servings a day. And I think it's a little problematic because they should have said, if you want to eat dairy, it's okay. Eat whole fat dairy, but it shouldn't be a mandatory recommendation. It kind of is in the guidelines. And the reason is some people have problems. 75% of the world's lactose intolerant. Some people have casings sensitive. Some people have immune issues with it. Gut issues with it. That's really important to acknowledge that this is not generally something that everybody should absolutely be eating to have a healthy life. It's not. It's optional. After weaning, don't eat the dairy. But if you want, I do way protein. I have yogurt sometimes. I have cheese sometimes. It's fine. But just be aware, it's not something you have to have to be healthy. And there's still some lack of guide around personalization. They don't really talk about tools we have to actually understand what's happening. You lab testing like functionhealth.com, glucose monitors, letter-stained genetics, just really a better nuance. So we asked you to send in questions. We're going to do the Ask Me Anything questions here. I asked Mark anything on it was AMA, Ask Me Anything. And you had questions. So let's walk through most of the common questions I saw come up. What do the new protein recommendations actually mean for everyday people? What this really means is that most people have been under eating protein for years, especially women, pregnant women, and older adults, especially older adults. Because their appetite goes down, they don't eat as much, and they muscle waste very fast. They get something called sarcopenia. So protein though isn't just about muscle. It's about blood sugar control, it's about metabolism, it's about immune function, but healthy aging. Protein is the only macronutrient protein fat and carb. Only one of those is necessary in large amounts. And carbs you don't need. There's no essential carbohydrate. It doesn't exist. You actually have to eat them to live a healthy life. Now, they're good for many reasons, fiber, they're good for phytochemicals and so forth. Fasts you do need, but only small amounts, gram, milligram amounts of omega-3s and some omega-6s. Protein you need in very large amounts, 60 to 150 or 200 grams, depending on your size, proteins a lot. And the new guidelines finally move beyond the sort of the bare minimum, prevent deficiency diseases and they recognize what we need to thrive. Now for most people, that means prioritizing protein in every meal, especially breakfast because people eat dessert for breakfast in America. French toast, waffles, pancakes, sweetened yogurts, croissants, muffins, bagels, I mean, the list goes on. And that means eggs, it means fish, it means meat, it means beans, it means dairy, if you can tolerate it. And if you're strained training and you're trying to preserve muscle or build muscle as your age, protein is even more important. Now the next question I got was, are whole grains really necessary for everyone? And again, this is where personalization really matters. Whole grains are not an essential human food. There were no grains in our diet before the agricultural revolution. They just were not part of our evolutionary diet for almost 200,000 years. So humans can do fine without them. They can't however be fine to eat, but they're not essential for everyone. If you're metabolic and healthy and you can tell with them well, and you eat them as part of a food matrix where you're not spiking your blood sugar with protein and fat, they can't actually be part of a good diet. But for people with pre-diabetes and some resistance, blood sugar issues, diabetes, even autoimmune diseases, gluten can be a problem, grains can be a problem. You probably want to avoid them and see how you do. The key question isn't, are whole grains good, but you tolerate them well. Vegetables, beans, tubers are really foods that provide better nutrients with fewer downsides than grains. Though I do eat grains from time to time, so I don't think they're taboo. I just think your body doesn't absolutely need them. So pay attention to how you feel, how you respond. Your body is the best doctor in the house. So pay attention. Next question we got was, how do these guidelines apply to kids and families? Well, for kids, the most important thing isn't about following rules. It's about building a foundation. And that means partying real, old food vegetables, quality protein, healthy fats, minimally processed carbohydrates, don't improve perfection, infreconsistency. Picky eating is normal in America particularly. And real life can be messy, but was at as much as reducing ultra-process foods or just getting rid of them, don't introduce them, avoiding sugary drinks, modeling healthy habits at home. I mean, kids learn more from what we eat than what we say. So small-state changes make a big difference over time. And people say, well, my kids don't want to eat this. They want to eat that. I don't know what's mac and cheese. It pizza, blah, blah. That's because you fed it to them and they're addicted to it. What do you think kids eat in Japan? They eat raw fish. They eat seaweed. Okay. Kids eat whatever is in front of them and what they're growing up eating. So I think people have to just understand they have to change their palate. Now, next question was, do the guidelines still recommend limiting saturated fat and should we? Well, yes, the guidelines still recommend limiting saturated fat. But the science here is more nuanced than the rules of justice, as I said before. The fat isn't inherently bad. Context matters. The source of the fat, the overall diet, replace it all, play a role. So saturated fat from whole foods like yogurt, cheese, meat, meat, it's very different than the body than when it's replaced with refined carbs and processed foods or when eating with those foods. So instead of kind of obsessing over fat grams and percentages, just focus on food quality and what you're eating it with. So if you're eating a lot of saturated fat with a lot of starch and sugar, bad, you're eating with protein and vegetables, no problem. So butter on your bread, bad, butter on your broccoli, you get whole foods matter far more than I say nutrients. Now, one of the things that was hinted at but not explicitly pointed out in the guidelines was that our policy matters and that our current health crisis is not a personal failure. That it's not your fault if you're overweight, it's not your fault if you have diabetes or you have heart disease, it's because we live in a toxic food environment. It's a toxic nutritional wasteland, the food swap, it's bad. And so how did we get there? We got there through policies. We got there through policies by our government that were influenced by the food industry. So chronic disease is a systemic problem. It's not a moral failing. There's decades of food policy that have favored cheap calories that subsidize corn and soy and wheat and a lot of the stuff that's turned into ultra-processed food and highly processed food. We've been focusing on treatment, not prevention, all that needs to change. We need to change our subsidies to support healthier food. I mean, we spend 98% of our subsidies on commodity crops that are turned into a highly processed or ultra-processed food and 2% on fruits and vegetables. Food labeling laws need to change. Right now, if you need a food label, you have to be a peach nutrition, it's spent to confuse you. Food industry has their hand in it. We need to have really clear labeling laws so people know like in South America, it's got black stop signs on the front of the package if it's got bad crap in it. School of Lynch programs, thank God we have the new guidelines because they're an influence of programs. Those will change. Healthcare reimbursement needs to change, but now actually this is really exciting. Medicare has just announced a hundred million dollars, a hundred million dollars. We're studying functional lifestyle medicine to address chronic disease. This is revolutionary. It's going to be 30 studies over three years. Each funded about $39 million dollars in order to help find out. If certain approaches that are different than what we do now are better at improving health outcomes or lowering costs or both, and once they find that that works, they're going to pay for it. In other words, insurance will pay for it. Medicare will pay for it. That's really exciting. So, food fix, uncensored, a new book that I wrote with my wife. Actually, my old book that we wrote kind of updated it really describes how food policy shapes what ends up on your plate and how our health is. So, it also shows what policies need to change and also how you as an individual can make better choices inside a broken system. So, the guidelines are amazing to summarize. They're a beginning of a new revolution in food and food policy. They're a critical shift. The first time in decades, federal nutrition policy is beginning to reflect the science. Enolving the harms of highly processed food, the importance of good quality protein, the reality that one diet shouldn't fit everybody. The metabolism matters, the low carb diets can be a therapeutic diet. This is all huge. These guys are a foundation. We sell more work to do that we require more research. We need more scientific integrity and all that matters. But for the first time in a long time, this is real progress and I'm excited about it. The future of nutrition has to go further. We need to spend billions of dollars on nutrition research. It's so important because food is the biggest cause of our chronic disease epidemic. It's the biggest cure it accounts for 90% of the chronic illnesses we see today. We're just 90% of our health care bill of $5,000,000. Really important. We need to study personalization, nuances, prevention, not just population averages. So, here's how it encourages these guidelines. First, focus on food quality. Reduce ultra-processed food and highly processed food or get rid of it. I don't really eat it. It's that actually food. I said this before, but the definition of food and I encourage you to go look it up in the dictionary is something that helps support the growth and health of an organism. And by definition, these things are not food. They make you sick. They don't support your health. So really important to understand that. I mean, I won't eat a sicker's bar. I like to chocolate bar, but I won't eat a weird, highly processed Dorito, but I might have corn chip. Just realize what you're eating. Read the guidelines at a starting point. They're not a rigid rule book. And it's really important to listen to your body and be a smart about what you're eating and try to put real food in your body, which is finally what the dietary guidelines say, which they should have said for decades. Now, if you want to go deeper in how policy and food policy shapes what ends up on your plate, I really encourage you to explore all that in my book. Food Fix Uncensored that I wrote with my wife, Briada, is coming out next month. And if you're looking for practical ways to personalize your diet, make sure to check out my free nutrition 101 guide, linked in the show notes. The science is finally catching up and now it's up to us to apply it, thoughtfully, personally, and away that actually supports long-term health. Thanks for joining me for office hours. I love diving into these topics with you. Remember, you are the CEO of your own health. And every choice you make can move you closer to healing and vitality. I want to keep these episodes as relevant and useful as possible, so tell me, what do you want to explore next? What questions are you wrestling with? What breakthroughs are you chasing? Share your ideas in the comments on social media or through the link in the show notes. I'm listening. Until next time, keep taking charge, keep asking questions, and keep showing up for your health. If you love this podcast, please share it with someone else you think would also enjoy it. You can find me on all social media channels at Dr. Mark Hyman. Please reach out. I'd love to hear your comments and questions. Don't forget to rate, review, and subscribe to the Dr. Hyman Show wherever you get your podcasts. Don't forget to check out my YouTube channel at Dr. Mark Hyman for video versions of this podcast and more. Thank you so much again for tuning in. We'll see you next time on the Dr. Hyman Show. This podcast is separate from my clinical practice at the Ultra Wellness Center, my work at Cleveland Clinic and Function Health, where I am Chief Medical Officer. This podcast represents my opinions and my guest's opinions, neither myself nor the podcast endorses the views or statements of my guests. This podcast is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional care by a doctor or other qualified medical professional. This podcast is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute medical or other professional advice or services. If you're looking for help in your journey, please seek out a qualified medical practitioner. And if you're looking for a functional medicine practitioner, visit my clinic, the Ultra Wellness Center at ultra wellness center.com and request to become a patient. It's important to have someone in your corner who is a trained, licensed healthcare practitioner and can help you make changes, especially when it comes to your health. This podcast is free as part of my mission to bring practical ways of improving health to the public. So I'd like to express gratitude to sponsors that made today's podcast possible. Thanks so much again for listening.